Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 24, 2007
Pitchfork Time

"We’d rather lose lives than elections*," is the new slogan of the Democratic party.

It is their justification given for caving in to Bush and for removing any timelines or conditions from the war funds.

Dem insider Tomasky writes:

As indefensible and tragic as the war is, this is the best Democrats can do right now. De-funding would have handed the Republicans a great argument going into next year’s election – which is, of course, one in which Democrats have their best shot at winning the White House in a long time. Iraq is Bush’s war, and Democrats need to make certain that it stays that way.

"Make certain it stays that way," by paying for it. That twisting of logic and lack of morality is breath taking.

But you may excuse that lack of morality, lack of standing for what the people think is right, because there is such a big threat out there.

It is dangerous in DC’s streets and being hassled a bit by ones own voters at home is simply less dangerous than being attacked by those very dangerous Republicans:

Democrats said they did not relish the prospect of leaving Washington for a Memorial Day break — the second recess since the financing fight began — and leaving themselves vulnerable to White House attacks that they were again on vacation while the troops were wanting. That criticism seemed more politically threatening to them than the anger Democrats knew they would draw from the left by bowing to Mr. Bush.

The Democrats are right I guess. Will there be hords of betrayed voters storming their home with pitchforks during those recess days?

There should be such action and much more. But that threat seems unlikely and is  obviously not an issue.

The danger is that Bush might take the bully pulpit and explain that the Democrats have little spine to fight and pay for his war on terra the way he wants. To avoid such deadly accusation, the Democrats show they have no spine at all.

Meanwhile each day more and more people are dying in "Bush’s war." Dying because the Democratic party, working against the will of the U.S. people, fears a toothless political enemy.

Where will your Congress rep and your Senators be through their recess?

Find out, meet them. They don’t fear you. They should. So don’t forget to bring your pitchfork.


* By membership rule one party members are required to restrain from sharing harmful consequences.

Comments

The danger is that Bush might take the bully pulpit and explain that the Democrats have little spine to fight
oh, i think they have a more options up their sleeve. they will have their war, one way or another.

Posted by: annie | May 24 2007 19:18 utc | 1

“We’d rather lose lives than elections”
A pretty safe way to lose both. Sad.

Posted by: Anonymous | May 24 2007 19:21 utc | 2

It’s not the Republicans, or their verbal attacks, that the Democratic Party fears. Given their obvious ability to abide the most scathing and constant criticism of their own rank and file, one can see that these Dems have hides thick enough to withstand the shrieking of the GOP, and the Might Media Wurlitzer as well.
No, it’s the wilderness they fear. They do not want to be out of the majority ever again, and they do not want to be out of the White House. They do so want to be in charge of the greatest military and economic power in the history of humankind, and they know they will only get there by serving the economic power that makes that political power possible.
Four-fifths of the campaign dollars that get them elected, and reelected, come from Wall Street, from corporations, and from private investors. One-fifth comes from the hoi polloi out here, wandering the streets and wondering where our country went.
Over at dKos, every shout out from another outraged citizen is met with accusations of them being a “purity troll,” someone who puts principles ahead of politicking. Someone who “takes their ball and goes home” every time the Dems snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
I have term for those who have nothing but blind faith that the Democratic Party will change next time, will give up on keeping their powder dry and actually use it.
BOHICA trolls.
It’s time for a third party.

Posted by: Antifa | May 24 2007 22:00 utc | 3

Watched Blitzer for a few minutes on CNN to-day. After they showed Bush giving tough talk in the rose garden they showed a glum looking Reid and Pelosi looking like they found horses heads in their beds this morning.

Posted by: pb | May 24 2007 23:08 utc | 4

Options? Full ceasefire in West Bank and Gaza!
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/24/173219/424

Posted by: mattes | May 24 2007 23:21 utc | 5

opposition – grotesque gnats

Posted by: remembereringgiap | May 24 2007 23:40 utc | 6

Keith Olbermann goes after Dems deal with Bush.
Read the comments for voices from folks whose “core of violent self-righteousness” ain’t stopping them from howling for change and accountability.

Posted by: catlady | May 24 2007 23:53 utc | 7

from Olbermann transcript:
Not that these Democrats, who had this country’s support and sympathy up until 48 hours ago, have not since earned all the blame they can carry home.
“We seem to be very near the bleak choice between war and shame,” Winston Churchill wrote to Lord Moyne in the days after the British signed the Munich accords with Germany in 1938. “My feeling is that we shall choose shame, and then have war thrown in, a little later…”
That’s what this is for the Democrats, isn’t it?
Their “Neville Chamberlain moment” before the Second World War.
All that’s missing is the landing at the airport, with the blinkered leader waving a piece of paper which he naively thought would guarantee “peace in our time,” but which his opponent would ignore with deceit.
The Democrats have merely streamlined the process.
Their piece of paper already says Mr. Bush can ignore it, with impugnity.

Posted by: catlady | May 24 2007 23:54 utc | 8

@Antifa: OK, I hadda look it up.
BOHICA
Yeow, wasn’t expecting this.

Posted by: catlady | May 25 2007 0:01 utc | 9

lol catlady, i had to look it up too but i stopped after the first link! speaking of purity trolls, i got in ones face today, they came back with the ‘simple fact’ that dems would lose the next election bla bla.
so i ranted all over her sorry ass.

Posted by: annie | May 25 2007 0:42 utc | 10

haha…guess I shouldn’t be surprised…
Jon Tester voted to keep on funding the war. The same vote Contrad Burns would have made if Tester hadn’t won his seat. Same exact vote. You tell me the difference between the two.
Little saddened, not surprised, guess the beltway mafia got to him…
I will say this, he and the democrats will never, ever get another moment of my time from now till hell freezes over.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 25 2007 0:48 utc | 11

It’s time for a third party.
could sweep up all the electoral disaffection into one indomitable pile by offering an antiwar/anti global capitalism/universal healthcare/green/feminist with a mexican bashing xenophobic/guntoting/antiabortion candidate.
angela davis/pat buchanan
that’s the ticket.

Posted by: slothrop | May 25 2007 1:17 utc | 12

annie @ 10, you, my dear, are the purity troll – be proud of it! purity and principle over politics and pragmatism anyday!
damn, what an ugly day.
colour me deluded, but i wonder what are the chances that al gore might run as a third party candidate?
bernhard, great post.

Posted by: conchita | May 25 2007 5:11 utc | 13

instead of slothrop’s selection, I think Ron Paul and Gravel should run as third party candidates. They should have, as one of their major policy initiatives, ending the stupid “war on drugs” and totally legalizing hemp.
Paul voted against the Iraq war, spoke truth to Guiliani’s operatic “Look at me! I was there! Would I lie to you? Do you want the fear fairies to appear? Clap your hands if you believe! Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!”
Paul would draw off independent-minded republicans who despise the religious right, Gravel would draw off democrats sick of the current crop…and if you’re not sick of them…
They would serve as spoilers for biz as usual. How many people in the U.S. don’t bother to vote? Get out the vote to actually do something different.
I don’t think they’d win, but they’d at least be able to talk about things that those who own the megaphones will not even bring up to the American people.
Otherwise, fuck the democrats. My apathy is nearly complete. I do understand why so many don’t bother to vote. it doesn’t matter. no one represents the will of the people.
fuck them all, republicans and democrats alike. may they all go to a special hell reserved for those who use their positions to create hell on earth…they’ll find lots of other pols and warlords there.

Posted by: fauxreal | May 25 2007 12:06 utc | 14

conchita! i so behind on the lingo curve. thank you for informing me . i thought it was pure party all the time. i reread antifa’s comment. i am a purity troll!!

Posted by: annie | May 25 2007 16:44 utc | 15

Fascinating read:
The Sack of Washington

Comparisons of America and Rome are everywhere these days, whether deploring an over-extended military, social decadence, or illegal immigration. A more disturbing—and largely ignored—similarity lies in the wholesale privatization of the U.S. government, which has blurred the line between public good and personal gain. In an excerpt from his new book, Cullen Murphy charts a dynamic that is more dangerous than corruption, unprecedented in scale, and visible everywhere from Hurricane Katrina to the Iraq war, to the justice system.

Posted by: Alamet | May 25 2007 16:46 utc | 16

This latest act, in the grand play we call politics, should suprise no one. Whoever has the gold rules. Period! Antifa said it best, except for the third party. The powers that be will never allow it.

Posted by: Ben | May 25 2007 17:32 utc | 17

Even deeper into the rabbit hole:From Brooks Brother Rioter to Judge
It is becoming clear, it’s not the firings, but the hirings we need to be looking at.
When the Law breaks the Law, there is no Law” ~Billy Jack

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 25 2007 19:02 utc | 18

From comment #4 “Reid and Pelosi looking like they found horses heads in their beds this morning.”
Not necessarily these two, Pelosi voted against it and Reid was dynamically negative. But, as is well known, there was something other than the NSA wiretaps going on — the suspicion has long been that there was/is political espionage.
Who knows the sort of pressure some of our elected may have felt?
But o my! Why do I think of such things? Just becauase the Codpiece and company have the morals and mindset of gangsters doesn’t mean they would stoop to such!
Forgive me — I forgot my (tinfoil) hat.

Posted by: Chuck Cliff | May 25 2007 21:14 utc | 19

Chuck Cliff-
yeah, I also think the Bush junta stoops that low. But the people who are at the highest levels of govt took an oath of office to defend the constitution. for that reason alone, let’s have a trial about whether or not Georgie is violating the constitution vis a vis this wiretapping.
if those who aspire to those offices aren’t willing to be heroic, aren’t willing to say, yes, I did this or that, and I’m being blackmailed now by the most corrupt administration in living memory, then, as I say, fuck them.
They expect kids to die for politics in Iraq; they should be willing to make a sacrifice as well.
But this incident is simply one more indication of the decline of the United States. Go watch OutFoxed again on Google video is you really want to see how “policy” is made in this country.
the media is just as complicit as the dems…and they’re all guilty.

Posted by: fauxreal | May 25 2007 21:25 utc | 20

For me in the Presidential:
fauxreal-(slotrop-vp with no portfolio)
annie-secdef
conchita-hhs/hud
rgiap: Director Prensa y Propaganda /Press Secretary.
uncle scam-director CIA, NSA, Attorney General
Ought to be fun to watch and document.

Posted by: Joe McCarthy | May 26 2007 7:39 utc | 21

theres the risk that if the Democrats fail to win in 2008, there may be even more deadly wars ahead.
the Rovian strategy is not intended to allow the Democrats any easy choices.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | May 26 2007 8:05 utc | 22

Unfortunately, Conchita, neo-feudal baron Al Gore will run as Jackass Party Candidate. He will immediately form a World State Of, By & For the Predators. Be Careful what you wish for.
At least voting for FaRTs (Fascists, Reactionaries & Theocrats) of Elephant Party could bring us nuclear war w/China that will put so much pollution in the skies that satellite communications will be impossible, and so Predators Totalitarian Dreams will go in the toilet.

Posted by: jj | May 26 2007 8:31 utc | 23

@Fauxreal, for those of us who have never watched Fox, why would we find it interesting?

Posted by: jj | May 26 2007 8:33 utc | 24

I dunno, jj. I’ve never watched Fox News either and I thought it was very interesting. You might want to read other things about it online to see if it’s something you’d like to watch.

Posted by: fauxreal | May 26 2007 13:18 utc | 25