Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 28, 2007
Tenet’s Non-Centrist Position

To get a sense on Tenet’s "tell all" book and his media appearances tomorrow, which accuse anyone but him and GWB of errors, consider the opinion of two political very different folks involved in the "action" to "fix the truth" on Iraq.

From the far right ex-CIA guy Michael F. Scheuer writes:

Tenet now paints himself as a scapegoat for an administration in which there never was "a serious consideration of the implications of a U.S. invasion," insisting that he warned Bush, Cheney and their Cabinet about the risks of occupying Iraq. Well, fine; the CIA repeatedly warned Tenet of the inevitable disaster an Iraq war would cause — spreading bin Ladenism, spurring a bloody Sunni-Shiite war and lethally destabilizing the region.
[…]
Tenet’s attempts to shift the blame won’t wash. At day’s end, his exercise in finger-pointing is designed to disguise the central, tragic fact of his book. Tenet in effect is saying that he knew all too well why the United States should not invade Iraq, that he told his political masters and that he was ignored. But above all, he’s saying that he lacked the moral courage to resign and speak out publicly to try to stop our country from striding into what he knew would be an abyss.

From the moderate center ex-CIA guy Larry C Johnson chimes in:

Sorry George.  Too little and way too damn late.  You had ample opportunity to blow the whistle on the Bush bullshit but you played ball.  I do not give a damn whether you did or did not say the case for war was a "slam dunk".  You signed off on Colin Powell’s presentation to the United Nations.  You, more than any other U.S. Government senior official, were in the unique position to know that the Secretary of State was selling a pack of lies.  And you sat behind him nodding affirmatively like a bobblehead doll.
[…]
Most importantly and tragically, you betrayed your country.  Instead of resigning in protest you provided the Bush Administration the pretext of respectability and became the scapegoat for their misdeeds.  Your silence contributed to the willingness of the public to support the disastrous war in Iraq which has killed more than 3000 Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.

If one is slashed by the right sided media and the barely left sided media one may rise out of it as a centrist. (Still usually unsuccessful as Sen. Biden will attest).

But when the right sided experts bash you just like the left sided experts do and both do so for rather irrelevant technicals like standing up for the truth, you might consider to be the asshole everyone thinks you really are.

Comments

It’s just gobsmacking to hear him talk about “men of honor” and the things such men will do, or not do. It’s what you’d expect John Gotti, or Michael Genovese to say if it were possible for a mafia captain to be forced into retirement, and live to tell of it on TeeVee.
It would be a thousand times more satisfying to have some answers about just what it is the CIA actually does. What do they do for the billions we give them? The bill cannot be ascertained accurately due to the “unknown knowns” of their black budgets, but it must at least come to several hundreds to several thousands for each voting citizen of America.
Enough to make it fair for said citizens to ask, “What the fark do you people do all day that I should pay for?”
To be this far off the mark on the whole Iraq imbroglio bespeaks not just institutional incompetence, but criminal collusion to get it wrong on purpose.

Posted by: Antifa | Apr 28 2007 22:14 utc | 1

A similar story from Senator Durbin.
Short-short: it was all a pack of lies, but I couldnt say anything because I was sworn to secrecy:
Link.

Posted by: Ms. M. | Apr 28 2007 22:15 utc | 2

Omerta
The honor of gentlemen.

Posted by: Antifa | Apr 28 2007 22:17 utc | 3

i’m not sure how standing up for the truth is a technicality in this instance. if tenet as the cia chief had resigned and admitted what his agency knew and wasn’t reported namely that the niger claim was a fraud and the aluminum tubes thing, the administration would have possibly landed in the hot seat. after the invasion when the ball dropped via wilson tenet took the wrap for bush then to, and left for ‘family reasons’.
here we’ve got durbin on the senate floor admitting that he knew it was a lie and was bound by secrecy not to tell the american public. he used his info as a member of the intellegence committe to vote no on going to war, but better that he get in trouble for leeking the intellegence than saying nothing.
why was their no one of influence who came forward before the invasion ?

Posted by: annie | Apr 28 2007 22:18 utc | 4

Looks to me that the administration hacks did not only not plan for what happens post invasion in Iraq, but were just as clueless about what to do after the whole thing fell apart here in the states — which, as they all now testify to — that they knew then that it was all a dog and pony show. Is there such a thing as “DOUBLE HYPOCRISY”?

Posted by: anna missed | Apr 29 2007 1:31 utc | 5

annie:
Interesting contrast Dick Durbin and Mike Gravel.
Dick is sworn to secrecy, to protect the machinations of the Bush regime from the people.
Mike puts 4100 pages of the Nixon regime’s machinations, assembled by Ellsberg and edited by Chomsky and Zinn, into the Congressional Record! when the NYTimes has shaky knees.
Mike Gravel is my man.
Gravel 2008
Mike Gravel (wikipedia)
(part 1 of 3 part listing to get past braindead typepad)

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 29 2007 2:10 utc | 6

annie:
I’ve watched him turning the Demoplican “candidates” into the seven dwarves twice already.
Question 1
Question 2
Question 3
Question 4
(part 2 of 3 part listing to get past braindead typepad)

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 29 2007 2:10 utc | 7

annie:
I particularly enjoy him making a fool of Chris Matthews. Or rather watching Chris Matthews make a fool of himself. I never knew Matthews was such a punk.
Matthew’s brings a knife to a gunfight
I’m unconcerned about Mike’s age. Nader or someone else a little younger can by Vice President.
Now I think I’ll have a look at his National Initiative for Democracy.
(part 3 of 3 part listing to get past braindead typepad)

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 29 2007 2:11 utc | 8

why was their no one of influence who came forward before the invasion ? – annie
because they are chicken-shits

Posted by: Susan | Apr 29 2007 2:30 utc | 9

wow JLF, thank for te wiki link, i just found out mike and i shared the same bday. i read this mornign cnn is not going to let him appear in the next debate, something about they get to choose and he doesn’t have a big enough following. what crap.
i love that Chris Mathews slap down!!, amazing, he’s talking about criminalizing the president! i love his balls! ‘the dems have given shelter!’
no wonder they are censoring him!
susan, i think they have the goods on each and every one of them, blackmail or something. i swear, how could you get this many chicken shits. it’s either bribery, or blackmail.
damn.. i’m gonna watch the 8 link again

Posted by: annie | Apr 29 2007 4:36 utc | 10

Durbin’s statements are interesting in that John Edwards also served on the select intelligence committee with Durbin and must have been privy to the same information. I may have missed it, but has he ever ‘stood up’ to these lies in this or the last campaign?
Tenet did not refuse the medal of freedom offered by the president. Hopefully Tenet’s book, as Bremer’s book earlier, will only underline how hypocritical these people are.
Funny how my relatives in the states find me too cynical and wonder why I would support someone “like Nader”.

Posted by: ww | Apr 29 2007 5:24 utc | 11

I think it’s great that the ultra right-wing are telling Tenet that he let down the entire country by NOT TRYING TO STOP, before the fact, this step off the cliff called the Bush Doctrine.
These guys are telling him that his position matters…and it cannot be a “careerist” position in order to be effective when you are in a position to know that that Doctrine won’t fly. So Tenet is a call out of everyone else who wants to come out of this present fiasco with a shred of any belief in their competence as a leader, a real leader that opposes idiot would-be nuremberg principle war criminals.
and, yes, Gravel would seem to speak for a lot of people. I was so happy to hear him speak at the debate. He’s for universal health care, it seems, but
He calls for a national sales tax –not a good thing for the poor, while it’s another gimme to the rich. As far as doing away with the IRS…I guess I just want to see something that stops this encroaching feudalism. The diff. between worker and investor salaries is arbitrary…until American working class stiffs refuse to put up with this shite, then income tax issues are sort of moot anyway, aren’t they? What about the inheritance tax? He seems more like a libertarian, and since the christofascists have no use for privacy (as in Ain’t no body’s business if I do) — and Republicans are tied up by the neo-cons and theo-cons… who knows, maybe Gravel and Ron Paul will run together and split off both republicans and democrats from the biz as usual crowd.
Hell, if they did nothing other than legalize hemp, they’d create a boom in the economy by making available a natural resource that can alter much of the way things are made today. But since Gravel is from Alaska… will he try to protect oil issues b/c it’s a blubber issue for that state’s economy? Can’t grow hemp there…at least yet.
If nothing else, that would be so satisfying…to see something rational occur. So I guess I won’t hold my breath

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 29 2007 8:38 utc | 12

Kucinich for V.P.

Posted by: beq | Apr 29 2007 13:22 utc | 13

@ faux – They could grow it inside? Huge greenhouses, solar panels? Probably do already. (privately)

Posted by: beq | Apr 29 2007 13:26 utc | 14

btw, beq, congrats on your invitation to show in an exhibition. I meant to email you, but I’m in oh, look how much I procrastinted mode so I’ll just say it here so that others can join me. (she’s in an exhibition that, from the stuff I saw, looks really interesting.)
I could see your work immediately (hey, I know that one!) and of course it was the one that started the eye moving across the poster for all the pieces included.
smooches.
oh, and since Alaska has 6 mos of nightime, or however long it is… I don’t know if your thing would be feasible considering the soil needs, sunshine, and the abundance of land that is in the right lat/long for such. Kentucky has a farmer’s hemp growing lobby.
ah well, nearly 10 a.m. where I am. time to go to sleep for a little bit.

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 29 2007 13:54 utc | 15

Interestingly, Tenet did come forward several times contradicting several of the the War Pary’s claims about Iraq, but it either was totally ignored by major media outlets or ended up as a few sentences buried on the back page of the newspaper. So while not innocent of corroboration with the Bush Administration, he isn’t totally guilty to the level that so many others are.
But we are now watching a deliberate cover up and killing of the message by the destruction of the messenger. Neither side wants the truth to come out since they were both up to their eyeballs in beating the war drums. Any Congress critter who voted for the war is apparently, when he/she says they ‘believed’ what they were told by Bush, either an out-and-out liar or, in the alternative, too dumb to serve in any capacity over dog catcher. Not considering myself to be a bloomin’ genius, if I was smart enough to separate the lies from the facts, surely they, with their huge staffs and researchers, could have done the same thing IF THEY HAD WANTED TO!
But they didn’t want to. Period. And it will be the same with Iran if any of this cowardly and/or stupid bunch get into the White House next election. Whining they didn’t know might be a good enough excuse for a friend or a cousin, but it makes me even more pissed off when it comes from someone we trusted to know what was going on and to do the right things on our behalf. Incompetent, lying, sacks of shit.
I do hope that the present top-running candidates of both parties are not the only ones who will be running.

Posted by: Ensley | Apr 29 2007 14:10 utc | 16

George –“I’m not a voyeur”– Tenet Strikes Back
After watching the crooks and liars capture vid, I have to say, the man makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up. And as much as I hate it, Cannon makes a damn good point.

Right now, the man is talking. He is of use. He is, like it or not, an ally. Of all the inside players likely to go blabby, he was probably the deepest inside.

So, I’ll hold off on the Roman punishment for now. The charade is not over. More shall be revealed.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 30 2007 13:25 utc | 17