Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 23, 2007
OT 07-32

News and views …

Comments

U.S. Knew of China’s Missile Test, but Kept Silent

After a Chinese interceptor smashed into a target satellite in January, Bush administration officials criticized the test as a destabilizing development.

What administration officials did not say is that as the Chinese were preparing to launch their antisatellite weapon, American intelligence agencies had issued reports about the preparations being made at the Songlin test facility. In high-level discussions, senior Bush administration officials debated how to respond and even began to draft a protest, but ultimately decided to say nothing to Beijing until after the test.

But some experts outside government say that American officials might have been able to discourage the Chinese from launching the missile, had the officials been willing to enter into a broader discussion of ways to regulate the military competition in space. China had long advocated an agreement to ban weapons in space, an approach the Bush administration has rejected in order to maintain maximum flexibility for developing antimissile defenses.

Meeting Chinese demands for a negotiation on space-based weapons was not considered an option for the administration. The United States last tested an antisatellite weapon — a missile that was fired into space from an F-15 warplane — in 1985, and has no current program to develop a new antisatellite system.

Posted by: b | Apr 23 2007 5:48 utc | 1

Kurds Cultivating Their Own Bonds With U.S.With Sunni and Shiite Arabs locked in a bloody sectarian war, Iraq’s Kurds are promoting their interests through an influence-buying campaign in the United States that includes airing nationwide television advertisements, hiring powerful Washington lobbyists and playing parts of the U.S. government against each other. A former car mechanic who happens to be the son of Iraq’s president is at the center of Kurdish efforts to cultivate support for their semi-independent enclave, but the cast of Kurdish proponents also includes evangelical Christians, Israeli operatives and Republican political consultants.

Seeking help to navigate Washington, Farhad Barzani turned to Danny Yatom, a former director of Israel’s spy service, the Mossad, according to senior Kurdish officials and former U.S. government officials familiar with the Kurds’ efforts. Yatom’s business partner, Shlomi Michaels, who was looking for investments in Kurdistan, agreed to help the Kurds find a lobbyist, the officials said. The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Michaels initially sought out Jack Abramoff, then a powerful Republican-connected lobbyist, the officials said. But Abramoff, who was later convicted of bribery and is now in prison, asked for more than the Kurds wanted to pay, the officials said. One American lobbyist said Abramoff wanted the Kurds to pay him $65,000 a month. Michaels did not respond to several phone messages.
Russell Wilson, a former Republican congressional staff member whom Michaels asked for advice, eventually suggested that the Kurds contact Ed Rogers, a GOP political operative and former White House official who runs one of Washington’s most influential lobbying firms. On June 3, 2004, Barbour Griffith & Rogers agreed to represent the Kurdistan Democratic Party for $29,000 a month.
Qubad Talabani said the firm lobbied the White House for the $4 billion.
Twenty days later, on June 23, the U.S. occupation administration in Iraq gave the Kurds $1.4 billion in cash. The U.S. military flew the money — brand-new $100 bills in shrink-wrapped bricks — to Irbil on three helicopters.

Talabani and Ayal Frank, a former congressional staffer and legislative analyst for the Israeli Embassy who was hired as a lobbyist by the Kurdistan Regional Government, sidestepped the State Department in favor of the Commerce Department, which they considered more receptive. “If a door shuts on you,” Talabani said, “you go in through the window.” After several meetings with Commerce’s Iraq task force, Talabani added, “common sense prevailed.”

Posted by: b | Apr 23 2007 6:24 utc | 2

As regards the Chinese missle test, remember that one of the first acts of this criminal regime was to fly too close to the Chinese mainland with an electronic surveilance plan, successfully crashing the Chinese fighter pilot sent up to confront it.
The Neocon regime did not want peace with Iraq it wanted war, it does not want peace with Iran it wants war, if wants war and confrontation wherever they can be had. This regime is a cancer eating away at the core of our civilization. If their is a “Clash of Civilizations” it between the Neocons and the rest of the human race.
No surprise on the Kurds’ lobbying efforts. The previous PM of Thailand lobbied up as soon as he was deposed. Representation in America is available to everyone but the American people.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 23 2007 6:38 utc | 3

Noble Resolve 07: April 23-27, nuclear terror drills in USA

Noble Resolve will examine how to deter, prevent and respond to a nuclear attack on the United States. At one point in the experiments, the bomb will explode inside the simulation, Kersh said. Noble Resolve will also strive to create processes for interactions among local, state, national and international officials, he added.

What’s left out here in this ‘program’ (like it was too in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, as well as Yugoslavia and Iraq and Afghanistan and Haiti and Vietnam and Nicaragua etc. on suitably ‘appropriate’ scales)?
Networking, cooperation, accountability, concern, regards, and oversight with/for/by The People.
That’s the inherant ‘flaw’ in their plans and programs — it’s not EVER about empowerment or genuinely helping citizens survive natural or manufactured catastrophes while developing their OWN community-enhancing systems and strategies etc., but about the Status Quo brokers creating or using Chaos to increase the PTB’s power and control.
And so it goes — Till We, The People have finally had enuff and refuse to let ourselves continue to be defrauded, victimized and made unwitting accomplices.
Note: For the record, this very post may be part of it. In other words, they very well may be watch this info being passed around, making it part of the drill in and of itself.
Also see my earlier post for more.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 23 2007 6:39 utc | 4

Police State Rising. Police Beat Up an Old woman and took gun. In Her Home!
you know what’s most telling about the video? it cleanly represents the logical *and* ethical dilemma that differentiates law-abiding citizens from criminals.
i can state without any fear of contradiction that all of the people in that video were law-abiding citizens. why? *they all answered affirmatively when asked if they had weapons*. and it was specifically because they answered ‘yes’ that they confirmed that they were law-abiding, *and it cost them their rights!*
the law-abiding citizen is forced into the ethical dilemma of *lying* to the police in order to preserve their rights. and in lying, they criminalize themselves.
how fucked up is that?
I like how they’re using the same tactics on US citizens as they would on iraqis. That’s equality for you!. Just be thankful that these were police officers who were confiscating the guns and not private blackwater mercenaries. Think that’s crazy? Talk to me in 6 months when it’s being buried in the media (front page story: a celebrity made an off color comment)
I can’t decide which is worst for society; old women having to carry guns or police/governments with too much power and being allowed to do such things…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 23 2007 7:08 utc | 5

Haaretz: A peace or war initiative?

Arming the Palestinian Presidential Guard is part of Elliott Abrams’ plan to bury the Mecca agreement, the basis of the national unity government. Abrams, deputy national security adviser to U.S. President George W. Bush and an acknowledged expert in the language of force, related in a closed-doors briefing that non-Hamas cabinet ministers would resign and that Abbas would dissolve the government and announce new elections. Apparently, the neo-conservatives have not learned that in the Middle East, a problematic regime’s removal can lead to the emergence of an infinitely more problematic one.

Israel: Syria readying for war

The gist of the Israeli message in its recent talks with United States Defense Secretary Robert Gates is that Syria is preparing for a military confrontation with Israel.
The U.S. message to Israel on Syria, in contrast, remained unchanged: Israel should at present avoid diplomatic talks with Damascus because President Bashar Assad plans on using such talks to extricate Syria from its isolation. Israeli talks with Damascus would be a knife in the back of the government of Fouad Siniora in Lebanon.
No tangible evidence exists, Israel told the U.S., that Damascus is planning an all-out war with Israel. But it is believed that Damascus has concluded that Israel might respond to various Syrian actions and that would be the cause of a full-blown confrontation.
Such an Israeli response might come following Syrian assistance to Hezbollah or Palestinian terror organizations like Islamic Jihad. Damascus would have no choice but to respond with a more extensive operation.
Such evaluations have been made before and proven mistaken.

A war in the summer?

The talk about a sizable war this summer already started in the midst of the war last summer (there were those who called it a promo and thanked Hezbollah for having revealed its weaknesses in ample time). A “sizable war” is a code name for a war that includes Syria. The outgoing chief of staff estimated in November that there would be a war with Syria this summer, and in a series of general-staff discussions he held, there was talk of “a working assessment” that dictated exercises in anticipation of a war this summer.
Now the summer is almost upon us. Was this an assessment or a self-fulfilling prophecy? When the Syrian president says that if there is no peace there will be a war, he is responding to incessant mumbling from our side. This is where the dynamics of another war start. In a situation as explosive as that in the Middle East, the sparks can be ignited even when no one really wants that to happen.

Posted by: b | Apr 23 2007 10:01 utc | 6

wonderful & historic participation of the french people in elections – tho i am not too optimistic fot the second tour – a great deal dependes on bayrou & tho his line is closer to segolan – he could do anything
finally this moment the fascist machine of le pen sropped in its tracks – both le pen fille & bruno golnitsch even less sympathetic than the thug le pen

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 23 2007 10:22 utc | 7

Here’s their “War Tsar”

Abrams, deputy national security adviser to U.S. President George W. Bush and an acknowledged expert in the language of force, related in a closed-doors briefing that non-Hamas cabinet ministers would resign and that Abbas would dissolve the government and announce new elections.

This guy does what he wants to. He pays no more attention to George XLIII than he did to Ronald I. If you doubt that there’s been a putsch in America watch what this guy and his henchmen do.

…an Israeli response might come following Syrian assistance to Hezbollah or Palestinian terror organizations like Islamic Jihad…
The talk about a sizable war this summer already started in the midst of the war last summer.

This is the Neocon sickness unfolding before our eyes. No one in the United States is lifting a finger to stop them.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 23 2007 10:36 utc | 8

Yes r’giap. I think that Royal is going to win. The tough guy’s ideas are attractive to many of the French at this point, for the globalist, neoliberal tide is at its flood, but the guy himself is utterly unattractive. He can’t trusted to act as a human being.
The French will vote for Royal over Sarkosky.
Look at the results of electing unattractive people in the US.
Eighty-four percent! Wonderful!!

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 23 2007 10:44 utc | 9

Palestinian minister ‘resigns’

The Palestinian interior minister has submitted his resignation after just one month in office because little progress has been made to reform the security services, officials have said.
In his first act after the unity government was formed on March 17, Abbas appointed Mohammad Dahlan of Fatah as national security adviser, a move criticised by Hamas.
Some Palestinian analysts saw the appointment of Dahlan as a bid to sideline al-Qawasmi, an academic with no experience in security matters, minimising his control over the security services, which are mostly loyal to Fatah.
Fatah also has been bolstering its force and the US has begun a $59-million programme to support Abbas’s presidential guard, and Fatah recently sent about 500 fighters to Egypt for more advanced training.

Elliot Abrams’ terrorist fund is about to bear its strange fruit. I wonder why Juan Cole and the other big name Demoplican pundits are so quiet about this?
Could it be that they, like the Demoplican politicians, are the property of the AIPAC?

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 23 2007 12:44 utc | 10

U$,
Bush wants to gut the second Amendment – not the part that the NRA so zealously seeks to protect about (individuals’) right to bear arms, but the key part about the right of the states to maintain a “well organized militia” without federal interference.
Bush now wants the power to call out the National Guard without a governor’s permission. In light of the Katrina catastrophe, of course.
Why is the NRA not – literally – up in arms about it? I would expect them to be bombarding congressmen with letters reading “The Federal Government can have control my state’s National Guard units when it pries them out of my cold, dead hands!”

Posted by: ralphieboy | Apr 23 2007 14:46 utc | 11

Some of us need a scorecard to keep track of the scandals of the Bush administration. Thankfully, Yahoo!News just updated theirs.
The money quote? “From the very beginning, this administration emphasized loyalty over competence. And at some point, that catches up with you.”

Posted by: Monolycus | Apr 23 2007 14:56 utc | 12

As regards the Chinese missle test, remember that one of the first acts of this criminal regime was to fly too close to the Chinese mainland with an electronic surveilance plan, successfully crashing the Chinese fighter pilot sent up to confront it.
JFL, I think you may be giving them too much credit. the incident you describe happened in April of 2001 and I don’t think they even had everybody seated yet at that time.

Posted by: dan of steele | Apr 23 2007 14:58 utc | 13

Is Shaha Riza a Spy?

This is not a matter that those who would know Ms. Riza or who trust Wolfowitz’s judgment should say “how dare someone raise that question?!” This should be the question that should have been asked at every stage of Shaha Riza’s apparent penetration of the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the private firm, SAIC.

Well, I hope she is one – now that really would bring Wolfowitz down …

Posted by: b | Apr 23 2007 16:38 utc | 14

Why is the NRA not – literally – up in arms about it?
Where does the strongest support for the NRA originate? Limiting the people’s right to bear arms would cut into the arms merchant’s profits, but nationalizing the state’s guard would almost certainly enhance them. Besides with a nationalized guard it becomes easier police the states to control those who would arm bears.

Posted by: Juannie | Apr 23 2007 17:44 utc | 15

yes RGiap the results were not too bad, a little better than I expected. The turn out was great.
Still, if I may introduce some pessimism here, what happened is that a good bit of the Le Pen vote went to Sarko. Sarko has pummelled the ‘immigration’ / ‘crime’ / ‘profiteering from the state’ themes enough to prick many dullard’s ears. Le Pen has complained bitterly about Sarko (and Sego) stealing his ‘issues.’ He used to boast that ppl prefered the original to the copy, now it is the other way about. So many lepenites became sarko champions, for various reasons: a mainstream candidate, dynamic and young, a genuine leader; somebody, finally, they could vote for, with pride, or even hysteria, and submission (the authoritarian aspect.)
World events as reported by the corporate media, and Le Pen’s influence, have made these prototypical populist right wing stances respectable. The one who did the most in that direction was Sarkozy. Any nerdy electoral strategist would have lined up that one. (Sego did the same thing in her own way.) In the case of Sarko, morevoer, the fit is good… his only interest in poor people, immigrants (etc.) is maintaining a cheap labor pool (therefore the ‘reforms’ vis. a vis ‘state regulations’ in that area – it is all perfectly standard) and he would willingly sweep them all away if it was politically possible.
Let me digress a bit.
We have the Swiss version of Le Pen in the Gvmt, that is the Federal Council – Blocher. He was elected, by the Parliament (would have been by the ppl if ..) to ‘defang’ him. As leader of one of the electorally most popular parties he ‘deserved’ a seat; and the only way to reduce their power, it was felt, was to bring them into the mainstream, whereupon reality hits and the kudos of easily gathering ‘oppositional votes’ (damn the Govmint, damn the disgusting foreignors, damn the big bosses, damn pollution, etc.) is to make them stand behind their words and to act within their contradictions (eg. they represent business interests who would never in a million years curb illegal immigration or pollution, yet scream endlessly about crimes done by blacks, by Kosovars, as well as about the essential purity of Swiss mountain air, all of it a copy-paste of Nazi garbage.) Others judged that electing him was dangerous, he would do a lot of harm; marginalize these people, let them keep their oppositional votes, don’t give them a look in. Upshot, he was elected.
Recently, he set up a meeting, just him, with the ‘respectable’ parts of the Muslim community, of course with Tariq Ramadan as a star (Tariq is Swiss), and the usual lot, a friendly lady in multiple scarves, thrilled by her new fame and smiling toothily at the cameras. The Fed. council was appalled, this is against both law and custom. Blocher cared not a bit; it is all sugary fluff about communities getting together and favoring integration. Net result? The differences between different religious communities becomes pointed and of more interest. There are, of course, good Muslims, but….many bad ones! So everyone will have to collaborate to ensure that the Swiss agree to the building of more mosques – minarets, don’t ya know, are objectionable (Blocher himself opposes them, architecturally, to boot!), terrorism is the scourge of the ‘modern world’, all this will have to be…worked out. Smile for take 5.
Sarkozy does exactly the same thing. He has campaigned at least somewhat in the ‘banlieues’ and has a woman (natch) Muslim spokesperson. She usually insists that Sarko is the most sympathetic type, the only one who ‘cares’. This is of course stealing a trick from the left, though the left is usually more sincere. Le Pen would not have set up such a meet; nor would he have campaigned in the ‘banlieues’. Sarko is more modern, wily; his supporters can say that he ‘understands’ Arabs, etc., so they – vote for him. (Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité? Huh?)
Sarko is also setting himself up internationally. Repressing or killing Arabs and Muslims in France, at a symbolic lower level – immigration policy, or ordering or allowing the media to enter this terrain with a lot of fanfare (already happening), to foster, in fact, present conflicts, or whatever WWx it is supposed to be, must be managed delicately. He will have to make insistent speeches to foreign potentates about the large Arab pop. in France and how he has to tread delicately, but is doing his utmost best to push ‘integration’, ‘democracy’, ‘women’s rights’ – his hands are clean, and he cannot do more, look at his track record! Nobody will dare to object in public, it will be all wise nodding (wink wink) – on the part of both parties. Still, he will be asked, or forced, to push the ‘anti-semitism’ memes.
That may even be happening now – the latest alarming depredation / graffiti in a French cemetery, swastikas (and ‘skin’ emblems) sprayed on headstones and tombs, while amply reported on the tee vee, radio, and some written press, often neglected to mention that the cemetery targeted was …the Muslim corner. I suppose the teeny Goths who did this had no clue about the fact that one can’t have it both ways, and that the hidden irony of their hapless gesture would stay unappreciated, but was – thru media prop – a perfect expression of the present state of affairs.
Sorry for the length!
Long term, that is what it is about. Quarreling about the 35 hour work week changes little on the ground…

Posted by: Noirette | Apr 23 2007 17:54 utc | 16

Sarkozy will win the presidential election. The next question is, how can his influence be limited?

Posted by: Noirette | Apr 23 2007 17:58 utc | 17

There is an unwritten rule in French politics.
It is: he or she who most wants to win, wins.
Chirac won in 2002 because losing would have sent him to jail.
(Say. And Bernadette Chirac has said that if the left wins now, – “we” – will both go to jail .. Oh the horrors!)
This is contrast to Switz. where ppl stand, are elected, but refuse the positiom; they stood because they wanted media attention on an issue; stood to divide the vote; stood as a favor to others; stood for a temporary egotistic thrill. (Frequently occurs.)
In contrast as well to the US, where the candidates are paid for, planned, in a kind of linear scheme, they are true representatives of some interests, unfortunately not the people’s, so they hardly ever withdraw in the scripted ballet.
Also in ‘new’ Europe, people stand and hope to win on a ticket which is usually based on ethnic guff (encouraged by the richer West.)
In France, there remains a spirit of let the best, keenest, most vociferous, leader, win, because the society is, after all, very cohesive and/or ‘monarchist’
c’est selon.
ok I will shut up for now…

Posted by: Noirette | Apr 23 2007 18:26 utc | 18

Sarkozy is abolishing inheritance taxes…………..

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Apr 23 2007 19:36 utc | 19

On a lighter note…
Iggy Pop celebrates his 60th birthday on stage
How the hell does he keep that sixpack belly, jeez…lol
Anywhy, his latest work, is quite catchy and hypnotic in a weird way…
Youtoobz: Punkrocker Featuring Iggy Pop

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 23 2007 19:54 utc | 20

Robert Wright: How cooperation (eventually) trumps conflict

Author Robert Wright explains “non-zero-sumness,” a game-theory term describing how players with linked fortunes tend to cooperate for mutual benefit. This dynamic has guided our biological and cultural evolution, he says — but our unwillingness to understand one another, as in the clash between the Muslim world and the West, will lead to all of us losing the “game.” Once we recognize that life is a non-zero-sum game, in which we all must cooperate to succeed, it will force us to see that moral progress — a move toward empathy — is our only hope.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 23 2007 22:21 utc | 21

from fisk’s bigass book, a vignette about the iran-iraq war:

Seven years after the war ended, it was easier to go back to the battlefields. I just turned up one summer’s morning in 1995 at Mehrabad Airport for Iran Air’s flight IR417 to Ahwaz, ate hot rolls with marmalade on the Airbus-yes, another A3oo-as my guide from the Ministry of Islamic Guidance snored beside me and, an hour later, circled the butane gas flames above the refineries before picking up Gholamreza’s Peugeot taxi to the deserts where we all lost years of our lives. The moment I pass the first sand revetments, the sun a white blister at seven in the morning, Gholamreza points into the grey immensity of dust and says: “Bang bang! Jang”
Jang, of course, meant “war,” and “bang,” for all its cliched, simplistic quality, is an accurate enough representation of the sound of the Iraqi field gun that destroyed so much of my hearing just across the desert to the west of here a decade and a half ago. As Gholamreza accelerates the Peugeot through the dawn, my tinnitus is ringing merrily away from that distant bombardment, as if those guns were still firing over these withered killing fields. To left and right of us, as the desert grows from grey to dun-coloured in the rising sun, the trenches and tank emplacements stretch away for scores of kilometres, some turned by farmers into windbreaks for corn, others untouched by a breeze in fifteen years, the track-marks of long-destroyed Iraqi and Iranian tanks still cut into the sand. Already it is loo degrees in the shade; perspiration is slicking down my face. In the back of the car, the man from the Ministry of Islamic Guidance has fallen asleep.
Perhaps a million men died here and in the battle line that snaked over goo kilometres to the north, to the snows of the Turkish border, almost twice the length [280] of the 1914-18 Western Front and fought over for almost twice as long. A whole generation of Iranians and Iraqis walked up the line to death in villages that sound, to the survivors and to the families of the dead, as sombre as Ypres and Verdun and Hill 6o, Vimy Ridge and Beaumont Hamel. The names of their calvaries are almost as familiar to me now: Kerman and Shalamcheh, Penjwin and Khorramshahr, Abadan and Fateh and Ahwaz and Fao and the battle of Fish Lake. The Iranians suffered most. I used to ask in my reports then, stunned by the resilience of the Iranian defenders, whether they had their Owens and Sassoons to write about war and the pity of war.
But-perhaps because the Iranians were so xenophobic, so alien in creed, so hostile to the West, even to us reporters who risked our lives to visit their trenches-we never really tried to understand their motivation, or the effect of this bloodbath upon their minds. Even today, we forget this. The Iranians do not. Did they, like so many soldiers in the First World War, return home broken in body and spirit, their faith abandoned in the blood-drenched desert? I asked a senior Revolutionary Guard Corps officer this question. What, I asked him over dinner in Tehran, was the worst moment of the war? “July eighteenth, 1988,” he snapped back at me. “It was the day we accepted the UN resolution to end the war, when our Imam said he had to eat poison and accept a ceasefire. I was driving a two-anda-half-ton truck to the front at Shalamcheh and I couldn’t believe my ears when I heard the news on the radio. I drove off into the desert and switched off the engine and I lay down in the sand, on my back with the sun above me. And I asked God why I was here on this earth. This was the worst day of my life.”
Gholamreza’s car raced south, the temperature rising, past a massive stockade of decaying Iraqi armour and trucks, mile after mile of it, stretching to the horizon and beyond. An Iranian sentry stood guard at this enormous war park, a museum of Iraqi tanks and smashed vehicles that belittled anything we saw in the aftermath of Norman Schwarzkopf’s puny offensive against the same army back in 1991. On the right, a great train of burnt, twisted carriages lay on its side next to the Ahwaz-Khorramshahr railway line. The Iraqis had crossed and recrossed this bit of Iran; the trenches and gun-pits streamed away from the road, thousands of them, each year of desert warfare grafted onto the next. With a telescope, you could see this webbed terrain from the moon. We crossed the brown waters of the Karun River; the last time I was here, there were corpses floating in its hot currents. It was 110 degrees; they fought in this heat, died in these ovenlike winds, rotted in less than three hours. No wonder they buried the Iraqis in mass graves and freighted home the Iranian dead in less than a day.
The poetry they wrote-for they did write war poems in their thousands, the peasant Basiii volunteers and the Pasdaran and the artists drafted to the front-was not like Owen’s or Sassoon’s. In the volumes of war verse in the Tehran bookshops, old soldiers thank God who has matched them with His hour. Rifling through the shops near Tehran University, I found the ghosts of Rupert Brooke and W. N. Hodgson in these fat volumes. Here, for example, is the Iranian poet Mohamed Reza Abdul-Malikian, writing his “Letter Home” from the Ahwaz Khorramshahr front, where twelve-year-olds led suicide attacks on the Iraqi wire:
Here on our front line,
Our gift of sacrifice is strewn around,
Their power greater than the Karun’s waves.
Right here, you can admire the children and old men
Who crave to walk the minefields.
It’s here for all to see.
There was something frightening in this: not just the terrifying image of child martyrdom, but what appeared-to my Western mind-to be a kind of stasis of maturity and development. True, Hodgson was writing like this in 1914:
Sons of mine,
I hear you thrilling
To the trumpet call of war …
Steeled to suffer uncomplaining
Loss and failure, pain and death.
But by 1916, our war poets had comprehended the obscenity of war. AbdulMalikian had written his lines after many more years of war. He hadn’t lost his faith. Was this because he was fighting to defend his own country or because Islam does not permit doubt in a believer? Or was it because in Iran a poem is supposed to be something holy, words that are intended to be spiritual rather than provocative? We in the West wait to be moved by a poem-simple patriotism and faith were not enough for Sassoon or Robert Graves. Wouldn’t they have said something more than Abdul-Malikian? After all, in the eight years that followed Saddam’s invasion of 22 September 198o, the war had embraced both poison gas and missile attacks, the worst horror of the First World War and one of the most terrifying potential weapons of the Second.
When I first wrote in The Independent about the “stasis of maturity” in AbdulMalikian’s poem and the obscenity of war that pervaded the work of the later British war poets, I received a long and challenging letter from a British Muslim.
If I wanted to comprehend the Iranian motivation and resilience, Zainab Kazim wrote, I must understand the meaning of the seventh-century battle of Kerbala:
I doubt whether I would be inaccurate in saying that the Iranians-in general-were aware of and understood the horrors of war before they were involved in the Iran-Iraq bloodbath. I think that Shias, on the whole, know a great deal more about the reality of martyrdom than the average non-Shia. I remember trying to explain the tragedy of Kerbala to my British friends at school and being astonished by their reaction. After all, I had already visualised the images of baby Ali Asghar with an arrow in his neck, Abbas with his arms slashed off, Akbar with a spear through his [281] chest and Hussain picking up each body, weeping over it and carrying it back to the tents … I had imagined the ladies of Imam Hussain’s family being led through the bazaars after their bereavements and speaking out against the rulers. I have grown up with this history and it was and is a part of me. Most Shias are well aware of the price one may have to pay for standing by one’s principles …

what great prose. but also an unsettling examination of khomenist deathcult.

Posted by: slothrop | Apr 24 2007 1:33 utc | 22

no time to read much today, but saw this and thought i’d pass it on. kucinich to introduce impeachment charges against cheney tomorrow. my fervent hope is that this combined with the recent vote in vermont is enough to bring national attention to impeachment and build some momentum.

Posted by: conchita | Apr 24 2007 3:20 utc | 23

Studio gets critics to pimp ‘United 93’ for Oscar nomination

Universal enlists critics for ‘United’ campaign
Does studio strategy blur lines between review and advocacy?
By Rachel Abramowitz, Times Staff Writer
January 11, 2007
In what appears to be a first in Oscar campaigning, Universal Studios has enlisted real-life film critics to appear in radio ads for its Oscar hopeful, “United 93” – Paul Greengrass’ film about the 9/11 flight that crashed in Pennsylvania.
Hence, instead of the ubiquitous voice of Mr. Moviefone invoking the film’s merits or snippets of dialogue over a pop song (tacky, given the film’s subject matter), the studio has opted for Rolling Stone’s Peter Travers solemnly declaring “United 93” to be “a monumental achievement.”
Travers adds, “There’s not an ounce of Hollywood bull in this movie’s 111 minutes.”
…..
Universal’s recent embrace of film critics is ironic, given that over the summer many of the studios waged campaigns to stress the irrelevancy of such arbiters of taste who panned such popular fare as “The Da Vinci Code.”
…..
“United 93” is based on real-life interviews with family members after the tragedy as well as phone and FCC transcripts from that fateful day. Far from being a tear-jerker, the movie re-creates what could have happened on the flight , which crashed and killed all aboard after 40 ordinary Americans took on the hijackers rather than sit helplessly and let the plane become another lethal firebomb dropping on more helpless civilians.
…..
Although the film is available only on DVD, Universal has recently put on television ads and somber print ads that say “Honor United 93.”

This is a unique event and highlights how important Hollywood is to the US government’s cover-up of the shoot-down of United flight 93 on 9/11.
Anything that can pump a little air back into the myth zeppelin of 9/11 will be milked.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 24 2007 5:17 utc | 24

Dupster diving w/Uncle…
Assault on the First Amendment
This little gem garnered a whole 18 comments…
A little snippet:

In the summer of 2005, Alberto Gonzales paid a visit to British Attorney General Peter Goldsmith. A British civil servant who attended told me “it was quite amazing really. Gonzales was obsessed with the Official Secrets Act .

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 24 2007 6:29 utc | 25

from the series, “you can’t make this shit up”
History will be made today when Copperas Cove resident Bill Thomas and his wife, Georgia, present President George W. Bush with a Purple Heart at the Oval Office.
link

Posted by: dan of steele | Apr 24 2007 7:01 utc | 26

read the article dos. these folks create a reality that’s possible to live in. in the middle of texas, they get away with it.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 24 2007 8:42 utc | 27

Network Hosting Attorney Scandal E-Mails Also Hosted Ohio’s 2004 Election Results

Did the most powerful Republicans in America have the computer capacity, software skills and electronic infrastructure in place on Election Night 2004 to tamper with the Ohio results to ensure George W. Bush’s re-election?
The answer appears to be yes. There is more than ample documentation to show that on Election Night 2004, Ohio’s “official” Secretary of State website — which gave the world the presidential election results — was redirected from an Ohio government server to a group of servers that contain scores of Republican web sites, including the secret White House e-mail accounts that have emerged in the scandal surrounding Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’s firing of eight federal prosecutors.
Recent revelations have documented that the Republican National Committee (RNC) ran a secret White House e-mail system for Karl Rove and dozens of White House staffers. This high-tech system used to count and report the 2004 presidential vote- from server-hosting contracts, to software-writing services, to remote-access capability, to the actual server usage logs themselves — must be added to the growing congressional investigations.
Numerous tech-savvy bloggers, starting with the online investigative consortium epluribusmedia.org and their November 2006 article cross-posted by contributor luaptifer to Dailykos, and Joseph Cannon’s blog at Cannonfire.blogspot.com, outed the RNC tech network. That web-hosting firm is SMARTech Corp. of Chattanooga, TN, operating out of the basement in the old Pioneer Bank building. The firm hosts scores of Republican websites, including georgewbush.com, gop.com and rnc.org………..

wow, recommend

Posted by: annie | Apr 24 2007 8:49 utc | 28

dos,
I’m all for it, if they can get Barbra Bush to present it. Which I imagine she would be willing to do. Perhaps he could wear a sandbag over his head for dramatic effect.

Posted by: anna missed | Apr 24 2007 8:52 utc | 29

UK tries to sabotage BAE bribes inquiry

The UK is covertly trying to oust the head of the world’s main anti-bribery watchdog to prevent criticism of ministers and Britain’s biggest arms company, BAE, the Guardian has learned.
The effort to remove Mark Pieth comes as his organisation has stepped up its investigation into the British government’s decision to kill off a major inquiry into allegations that BAE paid massive bribes to land Saudi arms deals.
British diplomats are seeking to remove Professor Pieth, a Swiss legal expert who chairs the anti-corruption watchdog of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), claiming he is too outspoken.

The director general of the OECD, Angel Gurría, also believes the UK is encouraging a smear campaign against him. Last Friday he was accused in a British magazine of giving a job to his daughter, getting free football tickets, and spending €733,000 (£500,000) to refurbish his Paris flat in what was described as “the poshest bit of the swanky 16th arrondissement”.
The article in the Economist quoted an unnamed north European ambassador expressing fears that “the staid old body [OECD] … may drift into dangerous waters” under Mr Gurría, the former finance minister of Mexico.
Following the allegations, Mr Gurría issued a combative statement, saying that he was under UK media attack by “innuendo, gossip and partial truths”.
“It is no surprise that this attack occurs at this time,” he added.
Britain’s ambassador to the OECD, David Lyscom, admitted yesterday that he had talked off the record to the Economist but added: “The UK had absolutely nothing to do with planting the story.”

Posted by: b | Apr 24 2007 12:02 utc | 31

america & race 2007 – fuck me dead

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 24 2007 12:05 utc | 32

Yes, r’giap, it is amazing to review the sweep of American history and to understand that the chapter on segregation is (perhaps) only now drawing to a close.

Posted by: DM | Apr 24 2007 12:29 utc | 33

heh vbo
you might consider heading back to Serbia. They now have found something there that strikes fear into the heart of Superman!
link

Posted by: dan of steele | Apr 24 2007 15:22 utc | 34

Security Breakdown at the White House?

Security practices at the White House are dangerously inadequate say current and former employees of the security office there, according to a letter sent today from the House Oversight Committee to former White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, asking that he cooperate with the committee’s investigation into the alleged security lapses.

Among the lapses cited by the security officers, who spoke to the committee anonymously, are multiple instances of breaches being reported to the security office that were ignored and never investigated. Several of those instances allegedly involved the mishandling of SCI (Sensitive Compartmentalized Information), which is the highest level of classified information.

Posted by: b | Apr 24 2007 15:32 utc | 35

Anyone know anything about this UK blog called TRUTHSEEKER?
I know nothing about them, however, my gut told me weeks ago that somehow, in someway, the Israeli’s and their company Amdocs Ltd/Cramer was tied to these Whitehouse e-mail server shenanigans.

But the real story this week concerns the collapse of the BlackBerry system on a national level. This was the direct result of Israeli-owned US firms’ technological probings into American top-secret communications network. As direct result of these break-ins via inside plantings of trap-doored systems, the famous BlackBerry systems crashed for almost 10 hours.

Amdocs had contracts with the 25 biggest telephone companies in America, and even more worldwide. The White House and other secure government phone lines are protected, but it is virtually impossible for any American to make a call on any American phone without generating an Amdocs record of it.

mere speculation of course, but one can’t really know anything these days as we no longer have investigative journalist’s.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 24 2007 17:30 utc | 36

Georgia high school students plan white-only prom
Friday, May 2, 2003, BUTLER, Georgia (AP) — Gerica McCrary said she cried when she heard about the decision to hold a separate white-only prom only a year after she helped bring black and white students together in her rural high school’s first integrated prom.
cnn
May 2004, LYONS, Ga. —  Decades after the Supreme Court ended school segregation, high school students in rural Lyons, Ga., are still separated from their peers of other races — at the prom. .. At Toombs County High School, there are three separate dances: one for blacks, one for whites and this year for the first time, one for Hispanics.
fox news
…………..
google for ‘segregated proms’ throws up more than 100 000 refs.

Posted by: Noirette | Apr 24 2007 18:45 utc | 37

Plunge in Existing-Home Sales Is Steepest Since ’89

Sales of previously owned homes suffered their biggest drop in nearly two decades last month, raising concerns that a rebound in the housing market is still far off.

“Far off” is interesting – in Japan, 20 years later, housing prices have not yet reached their previous levels.
Still have assets in US$? It may rebound bit on technics now as it is again on a historic low. But I wouldn’t bet on that …

Posted by: b | Apr 24 2007 19:55 utc | 38

Cover story of NYT Magazine on Sunday addressed the $billion of remittances transferred by migrant workers in the global economy from rich to poor nations. Such remittances are an old story, creating lifelines for the poor in many struggling corners of the globe. I wondered why it is suddenly a cover story.
An economist friend, born, living, and working in the developing world, offerred his quick take – rather different than most of the high-minded economic rhetoric offered on the subject these days, about protecting the migrants from predatory money transfer services and organizing these funds so that they are wisely invested.
My friend:

remittances……thats because there is tremendous money to be made from the control of the flow of remittances. this interest started with 9/11 and the flow of terrorists funds. but from security concerns some people learned that there was a trememdous amount that was being sent by informal methods which were not benefitting Chase, JP and the like
so now the World Bank gets into the act as does Harvard and it is all being presented under the rubric of efficiency ( both in transmission, taxation and in ultimate use)

Posted by: small coke | Apr 24 2007 21:38 utc | 39

From Business Week:
BENTONVILLE, Ark.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has been recruiting former military and government intelligence officers for a branch of its global security office aimed at identifying threats to the world’s largest retailer, including from “suspect individuals and groups”.
Wal-Mart’s interest in intelligence operatives comes at a time when the retailer is defending itself against allegations by a fired security employee that it ran surveillance operations against targets including critics, dissident shareholders, employees and suppliers. Wal-Mart has denied any wrongdoing.
Wal-Mart posted ads in March on its own web site and sites for security professionals, including the bulletin of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers, for “global threat analysts” with a background in government or military intelligence work.
The jobs were listed with the Analytical Research Center, part of Wal-Mart’s Global Security division, which is headed by former senior CIA and FBI senior officer Kenneth Senser. The analytical unit was created over the past year and half, according to published comments by its head, Army Special Operations veteran David Harrison.
The job description includes collecting information from “professional contacts” and public data to anticipate and assess threats stemming from “world events, regional/national security climates, and suspect individuals and groups.”
“Familiarity with a broad spectrum of information resources and data-mining techniques” is listed among the skills sought, along with a foreign language, preferably Chinese or Spanish.
A Wal-Mart spokesman declined to comment on the Analytical Research Center for this story or to make any security executives available for interviews.
Many corporations hire law enforcement officers for their security departments.
But Steven Aftergood, who runs the government secrecy project for the Washington-based Federation of American Scientists, said Wal-Mart’s efforts appear to go beyond what most companies are doing, raising questions about corporate intelligence work outside of the oversight process in place for government spying.
“It’s a troubling new departure in corporate security. We’re not just talking about security, we’re talking about intelligence operations,” Aftergood said.
Harrison told a meeting of security professionals last year that Wal-Mart was learning to defend itself by using the vast information it routinely collects about its employees, shoppers and suppliers.
The only public comment to date on the work of the Analystical Research Center, the speech was reported on by the trade magazine Government Security News. Wal-Mart did not dispute the report when contacted by The Associated Press this week.
Harrison told the meeting that Wal-Mart tracks customers including those who use its pharmacies, buy propane tanks and anyone making “bulk purchases” of prepaid cell phones, which some law enforcement officials have tied in the past to terrorist or criminal activities.
Harrison did not elaborate on how that information could be better used, except to say the data could be shared with law enforcement.
Wal-Mart’s union-backed critics said culling customer data for intelligence was disturbing.
“The idea that Wal-Mart is creating its own personal CIA should make every American — Wal-Mart customer or not — nervous about whether Wal-Mart is invading their privacy or could do so in the future,” said Chris Kofinis, spokesman for WakeUpWalMart.com.

Wal-Mart recruits intelligence officers

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 25 2007 0:37 utc | 40

uncle- when i first heard of that it immediately brought to mind jim hougan’s warning nearly thirty years ago, in his 1978 book spooks: the haunting of america – the private use of secret agents

..from presidents and billionaires to the manufacturers of cars and hamburgers, spookery has spread with a vengeance, corrupting what it touches as certainly as a cancer cell will do. Its nature is inherently corrupt: to gain advantage over others by the secret manipulation of people, products, and information, using any means necessary to accomplish whatever objective the paymaster commands. Inevitably undemocratic, the use of intelligence methods has nevertheless been tolerated as a necessary evil of foreign policy. Unfortunately those methods cannot be confined to relations between states. On the contrary, precisely because the methods are so effective, they’ve become an integral part of both domestic politics and the commercial sector.

However difficult they are to solve, the problems manifested by the private use of secret agents are fundamental to the well-being of a democratic society. If we ignore those problems, we’re likely to witness the emergence of a new sort of totalitarianism, an industrial regime of secret agents and manipulators operating within the framework of a state that has only become nominally democratic.
If that happens, it will be too late for any exorcist.

hey look! black bags are on sale!

Posted by: b real | Apr 25 2007 3:17 utc | 41

re somalia, the u.s.continues to give the greenlight to ethiopia’s meles to go on killing civies.
despite getting caught lying about the intensity of the fighting going on in somalia, the spokesperson still was able to get away w/ not clarifying which party he was refering to when making the stmt that the battle is against “violent extremists who do not have an interest in building up the institutions of a democratic state.”
given that the destabilization of somalia after six months of unification by the islamic courts & the fragmentation of somalia under the 4.5 clan formula were two objectives of the invasion, it’s quite clear who the violent extremists really are. what’s going on is no doubt most violent & extreme.
and it’s apparently okay, according to the u.s. govt. from the transcript of tuesday’s DoS daily press briefing

QUESTION: Are you calling for a ceasefire in Somalia or are you urging the Ethiopians to go for these insurgents with as much intensity as they could?
MR. MCCORMACK: You don’t want to see any more violence in Somalia. Everybody would like that to be the case, but there are clearly people there, individuals who are intent upon using violence in order to further a so-called political cause. And we have seen that in other areas around the world. And what can’t be allowed to happen is for those forces to gain a foothold to develop a safe haven from which they could possibly launch attacks against other states in the region and further.
QUESTION: So you’re not calling for a ceasefire?
MR. MCCORMACK: We want to see an end to the violence. But the real way to get an end to the violence is (a) stabilize the security situation and (b) find a political situation that is workable for the major political factions in Somalia life that have an interest in actually building a different kind of Somalia as opposed to the one we’ve seen for the past few decades.

nearly 300 people are reported known to have been killed in the last 6 days of fighting in mogadishu. casualties are a lot higher. in the heavy fighting a few weeks ago, more than 1,000 were killed. i haven’t ran across any numbers that were killed in the original invasion back in december.
and the numbers will go higher, so long as the domestic population & international community continue to sit on their asses and not call the u.s. on this bullshit!

Posted by: b real | Apr 25 2007 4:27 utc | 42

another one on somalia
hey! i thought the u.s. was all about advancing the gospel of free enterprise, right? well they’ve got it all backwards in somalia…
Profiteers, too, fight government in Somalia

GALKAYO, Somalia: Beyond clan rivalry and Islamic fervor, the chaos in Somalia is being helped along by an entirely different motive: profit.
A whole class of opportunists from squatter landlords to teenage gunmen for hire to vendors of out-of-date baby formula has been feeding off the anarchy in Somalia for so long that they refuse to let it go. They do not pay taxes; their businesses are totally unregulated, and they have skills that are not necessarily geared toward a peaceful society.
In the past few weeks, these profiteers have been teaming up with clan fighters and radical Islamists to bring down Somalia’s transitional government, the country’s 14th attempt at ending the free-for-all of the last 16 years. They are attacking government troops, smuggling in arms and using their business savvy to raise money for the insurgency. And they are surprisingly open about it.
Omar Hussein Ahmed, an olive oil exporter in Mogadishu, the capital, said he and a group of fellow traders recently bought some missiles to shoot at government soldiers. Taxes are annoying, he explained.
Maxamuud Nuur Muradeeste, a squatter landlord who makes a few hundred dollars each year renting out rooms in the former Ministry of Minerals and Water, said he recently invited insurgents to stash weapons on his property. He will do whatever it takes, he said, to thwart the government’s plan to reclaim thousands of pieces of public property.
“If this government survives, how will I?” Muradeeste said.

Somalis are legendary individualists, and when the central government imploded in 1991, people quickly devised ways to fend for themselves. Businessmen opened their own hospitals, schools, and telephone companies, and even privatized mail service.
Men who were able to muster private armies (often former military officers) seized the biggest prizes: abandoned government property, like ports and airfields, which could generate up to $40,000 a day. They became the warlords. Many trafficked in guns and drugs and taxed their fellow Somalis at roadside checkpoints.
Beneath the warlords were clan-based networks of thousands of people adolescent enforcers, stevedores, clerks, truck drivers and their families all tied into the chaos economy. Ditto for the freelance landlords and duty-free importers.

Not all opportunists had the same agenda. Many in the business community eventually got fed up with paying protection fees to the warlords and their countless middlemen, who became increasingly disorganized and rapacious.
Business leaders then backed a grassroots Islamist movement that drove the warlords out of Mogadishu last summer and brought peace to the city for the first time in 15 years.
The Islamists seemed to be the perfect solution for the traders: They delivered stability, which was good for most business, but they did not confiscate property or levy heavy taxes. They called themselves an administration, not a government.
“Our best days were under them,” said Abdi Ali Jama, who owns an electrical supply shop in Mogadishu.

now the business owners are taking up arms against the TFG, who’ve interrupted business as usual, seizing property, increasing port taxes by 300%, and so on…
— — —
in ogaden on tuesday — ogaden being former somali territory that wound up located inside ethiopian borders — someone struck back at those clearing people off oil land.
74 dead in attack on oil field in Ethiopia

ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia (AP) — Gunmen raided a Chinese-run oil field in eastern Ethiopia on Tuesday, killing 65 Ethiopians and nine Chinese workers, an official of the Chinese company said.
Seven Chinese workers were kidnapped in the morning attack at the oil installation in a disputed region near the Somali border, Xu Shuang, the general manager of Zhongyuan Petroleum Exploration Bureau, told The Associated Press.
China has increased its presence in Africa in recent years in a hunt for oil and other natural resources to feed its rapidly growing economy. Its forays into areas considered politically unstable, however, has exposed Chinese workers to attacks.

the ogaden national liberation front (ONLF) claimed responsibility and issued a stmt
O.N.L.F. Statement On Military Operation Against Illegal Oil Facility In Ogaden

Before dawn this morning At 0430 AM local time in Ogaden, the ‘Dufaan’ commando unit of the Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF) conducted a military operation in the vicinity of Obala, 30km North-West of Degah-Bur in in Northern Ogaden. The operation targeted 3 military units of the TPLF regime who were guarding an oil exploration field. Exploration activities at the field began recently following an agreement between the Ethiopian government and a Chinese company.
As part of this agreement large areas inhabited by ethnic Somalis were cleared with civilians being forcefully removed from their homes by Ethiopian troops. In addition, Ethiopian forces closed off a large area denying the local nomadic population their traditional grazing areas in order to establish a security perimeter guarded by Ethiopian troops for the oil facility.
TPLF forces in Obala have now been wiped out with many having surrendered to ONLF commandos.

ONLF forces rounding up Ethiopian military prisoners following the battle came across 6 Chinese workers. They have been removed from the battlefield for their own safety and are being treated well.
The ONLF has stated on numerous occasions that we will not allow the mineral resources of our people to be exploited by this regime or any firm that it enters into an illegal contract with so long as the people of Ogaden are denied their rights to self-determination.
By refusing to discuss a comprehensive political solution to the Ogaden issue in a neutral country and in the presence of a third party, the TPLF regime has made clear its intention to continue to pursue a military solution in Ogaden. As such, we wish to reaffirm to the international community that the Ogaden region continues to be a battle zone between armed forces of the current TPLF led regime and our liberation forces. It is not a safe environment for any oil exploration to occur.

the ethiopian govt, no surprise, is going overboard, throwing in the kitchen-sink of GWOT rhetoric — islamic extremists, eritrea, AQ, blah blah blah.
the ogaden online editorial board exhibits cooler heads on the matter
Prospecting Perils in the Ogaden War Zone

At a time when the heads of the autocracy in Addis Ababa were in the midst of an all out campaign to convince would be investors the reasons for investing in the Calub and Hilala gas fields, the Ogaden editorial board, exactly one year ago, warned about the inherent perils in prospecting in such a dangerous security zone.
Basic common sense dictates that investment especially one that requires the infusion of billion of Ethiopian Birs requires security first and foremost. In Ogaden, security is as illusive as finding a white squirrel in the Horn.
Instead of resolving the Ogaden problem first, the current regime appears to have convinced itself to put all its resources in attracting oil investment in the hopes of pacifying the long suffering Ogaden populace with would-be oil and gas crumbs.
With the ever increasing price of oil and the belief by those in the higher echelons of the Ethiopian autocracy that there is far more oil and natural gas in the Ogaden basin than what has so far been prospected, a massive campaign to displace thousands of local herders from the ever dwindling grazing land was initiated lately.
An Ogaden nomad or herder would rather die than leave his or her precious grazing land. The incident at Cobole where Ethiopian military guards and workers including Chinese prospectors were killed or taken captive took place precisely for this reason. It has nothing to do with ‘terrorism’ even though the head of the Ethiopian autocracy would, as always, have us believe otherwise.
Ogaden National Liberation Front, ONLF, fighters might have helped the locals to resist being evicted from their grazing land however the responsibility of the Cobole incident rests squarely on the shoulders of the Ethiopian military and the head of the dictatorial regime in Addis Ababa who ordered the mass eviction of Ogaden nomads from their grazingland.
The Cobole incident and prospecting perils aside, the Ogaden Online editorial Board hope that ONLF leaders would arrange for the safe return of the captive Chinese workers. The Chinese government should not listen to Ethiopian security propaganda and should remove all its citizens from the Ogaden war zone.
We are sure that unless the Ogaden problem is resolved and a mutually beneficial agreement put in place for the benefit of the Ogaden populace, oil and natural gas prospecting will always remain in peril and an exercise in futility.

Posted by: b real | Apr 25 2007 5:12 utc | 43

Preview: “Buying the War”
How the administration marketed the war to the American people has been well covered, but critical questions remain: How and why did the press buy it, and what does it say about the role of journalists in helping the public sort out fact from propaganda?
Bill Moyers Journal:
Buying the War
Wednesday, April 25, 2007 at 9 PM on PBS (check local listings)

Posted by: b | Apr 25 2007 8:19 utc | 44

b real @ 43
again thanks for this. when I heard about chinese oil field workers being killed I put on my tinfoil hat and thought it might be some of our black ops. it is somewhat comforting to know that this is not the case.

Posted by: dan of steele | Apr 25 2007 8:38 utc | 45

Interesting analysis: The last thing the Middle East’s main players want is US troops to leave Iraq

while the US can no longer successfully manipulate regional actors to carry out its plans, regional actors have learned to use the US presence to promote their own objectives. Quietly and against the deeply held wishes of their populations, they have managed to keep the Americans engaged with the hope of some elusive victory.

The grand disconnect in the region is between the political sentiments of ordinary people, which are overwhelmingly for an end to occupation, and the political calculations of leaders, which emphasise the benefits of using the Americans and consequently of extending their stay – at least for the time being.
In this grim picture, the Americans appear the least sure and most confused. With unattainable objectives, wobbly plans, changing tactics, shifting alliances and ever-increasing casualties, it is not clear any longer what they want or how they are going to achieve it. By setting themselves up to be manipulated, they give credence to an old Arab saying: the magic has taken over the magician.

Posted by: b | Apr 25 2007 10:00 utc | 46

The grand disconnect in the region is between the political sentiments of ordinary people, which are overwhelmingly for an end to occupation, and the political calculations of leaders…
Sounds like… the USA. Like everywhere.
Ordinary people of the world… Unite!
We have nothing to lose but our Masters! and the chains of fear they use to play us for Slaves!

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 25 2007 11:18 utc | 47

A good piece on Lebanon and the Chirac – Hariri connections:
Lebanon: France Moves To Incite Civil Unrest

Negotiations to find a compromise between the International Tribunal and the protection of the Lebanese Resistance from US and Israeli vindication have been going on, but very slowly. Chirac, however, is in a hurry. He wants a tribunal before the end of his term in May 2007. He has been unremittingly lobbying for the Tribunal to be approved by special UN Security Council resolution under the 7th Article of the UN Charter. This would effectively declare Lebanon a non-state, and place it under the control of the UN. This is also the best way to start a civil war. The Opposition has repeatedly warned that forcing the International Tribunal through the Security Council will lead to “chaos”, a euphemism for unbridled civil violence.

In reality, the Chirac-Hariri relationship has to be viewed from a different perspective. As soon as he leaves office in a few weeks time, Chirac will be investigated by the French judiciary on charges of corruption and undeclared personal and political “funding” during his tenure as mayor of Paris. Many of his senior aides have already received prison sentences.
It is very likely that Chirac has received “funding” from his Saudi-Lebanese billionaire friend. It is very likely that Chirac did not declare this money. Chirac needed funds. Hariri needed credibility. And Chirac has no shame when it comes to selling French credibility. A few weeks ago, he bestowed the French Honor Legion onto Saad Hariri, son of the late Rafic Hariri. Saad’s achievements in the political arena before his dad’s death are well known: he was spending his dad’s money between Riyadh, Paris, Monte Carlo and Washington. Well worthy of the honor legion.
The Hariris still need President Chirac, a powerful ally with permanent membership on the UN Security Council. Chirac may still need the Hariris, one of the biggest fortunes on earth, with tentacular connections to help him in his legal predicament. This may well be the dark side of this friendship.
In his efforts to restart the Lebanese civil war, Chirac is supported by the US and Britain. They’re happy to lead him down the path they have cleared in their Iraqi adventure, and to teach him one last lesson before he goes: never say “I told you so” when you are a corrupt politician. Lebanon could well become Chirac’s Iraq.

And now connect this

14:24 Chirac to live in home owned by family of murdered ex-Lebanese PM Hariri (Reuters)

Posted by: b | Apr 25 2007 12:37 utc | 48

What a tawdry mess.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 25 2007 13:44 utc | 49

well, Dennis got the ball rolling. it is now up to the other wobblycrats to grow a collective spine. who knows? it could happen…
Dropping the first shoe

Posted by: dan of steele | Apr 25 2007 15:31 utc | 50

@dan – I think impeachemnet will go nowhere – there has to be a “smoking gun” and there isn’t any yet.
via Angry Bear

This is one of the scariest stories I ever read. If this is correct, we are officially living in a Banana Republic. Via my friend Steve Benen a post from Slashdot:
Netcraft is showing that an event happened in the Ohio 2004 election that is difficult to explain. The Secretary of State’s website, which handles election reporting, normally is directed to an Ohio-based IP address hosted by the Ohio Supercomputer Center. On Nov. 3 2004, Netcraft shows the website pointing out of state to a server owned by Smartech Corp. According to the American Registry on Internet Numbers, Smartech’s block of IP addresses 64.203.96.0 – 64.203.111.255 encompasses the entire range of addresses owned by the Republican National Committee. Smartech hosted the recently notorious gwb43.com domain used from the White House in apparent violation of the Presidential Records Act, from which thousands of White House emails vanished. Can anyone suggest a good explanations for this seemingly dubious election-eve transfer?

Posted by: b | Apr 25 2007 16:33 utc | 51

b,
You could as well have pointed to annie’s link in @28 above.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 25 2007 16:38 utc | 52

b, for more check out related stories, the michale connell links, atwater etc

Posted by: annie | Apr 25 2007 16:57 utc | 53

@John, annie – opps – sorry …

Posted by: b | Apr 25 2007 17:18 utc | 54

there has to be a “smoking gun”
oh Bernhard, there are so many smoking guns and dead bodies that the entire administration could be put in prison and/or sent to the Hague in a New York minute. The admitted refusal to follow FISA laws is perhaps the most blatant and obvious but all the signing statements could be entered into evidence as well. Taking the country into war on false pretenses is also an impeachable offense and that is easy enough to prove.
No, it takes courage and desire to do the right thing. It would indeed be a constitutional crisis and if the congress did not prevail it would open the door to the final outcome of outright dictatorship.
I agree that impeachment is unlikely and can only happen if a group of elites decide to change leadership in the US. That could happen if there is way to make money doing it.

Posted by: dan of steele | Apr 25 2007 17:30 utc | 55

don’t miss this link

On this visit, Curtis says Feeney wanted him to write a software program that could alter election results on electronic voting machines. Curtis, a lifelong Republican, assumed Feeney wanted to pre-emptively head off any Democratic attempts to steal elections. So he wrote the software.
The program installed hidden “buttons” on the screens of voting machines that would enable a user who knew they were there to recalibrate the tally, giving a preferred candidate 51 percent of the vote automatically, and splitting the remaining 49 percent of the vote among other candidates proportionately so that no one would be the wiser.

the mike mcConnell story refers to CDI, Synhorst, Tidewater Consulting.. all those guys were contributors to feeney’s campaign. he was in thick w/all them, plus abramoff.
once you go dumpster diving into ohio and florida it’s hard to emerge thinking the elections weren’t stolen. very hard. as they became less and less popular they just kept designing more ways to abolish the system. you’ld think it would have occurred to them to just become more electable.
these criminal minds know no bounds.
curtis testifying youtube
bradblog CLINT CURTIS ‘STUNS’ JUDICIARY
of course the national press never writes about this stuff.

Posted by: annie | Apr 25 2007 18:18 utc | 56

whoa, check this out w/photos
This Protest Won’t Go Away Dahr Jamail reporting

BEIRUT, Apr 25 (IPS) – Lebanon is caught in political gridlock in the face of sustained opposition to the U.S.-backed government.
The government is refusing to give in to opposition demands for more representation. The government says it is there to stay; so do the protesters.
Their opposition is very visible. Scores of tents, many with solar powered television sets, wooden walls and doors, and cooking facilities fill several huge parking lots at the foot of the heavily barricaded headquarters of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora’s government.

WAY TO GO LEBANON

The site is mostly quiet during the day, but in the evening thousands stream into the camps to listen to speeches, drink coffee and tea, smoke hubble-bubble pipes, and talk. And, in the Riad es-Solh Square, they watch the huge movie-sized screen of Al-Manar television news (Hezbollah’s TV station).
“We’re here demanding full participation of all different groups in the political decision- making of our country,”
a 27-year-old organiser at the site who gave his name only as Jirgus told IPS.
“We’re here demanding full participation of all different groups in the political decision- making of our country,” a 27-year-old organiser at the site who gave his name only as Jirgus told IPS.
The protest is already bringing results, he said. “One of the advantages of this sit-in is that people from the north are meeting people from the south, and different religions are uniting.”
Like everyone else IPS spoke with at the sit-in, Jirgus said he would continue with the protest as long as it took.
As long as this government continues with their pro-U.S. and pro-Israel policies, and continues to choose not to allow all people fair representation, we are left with only this choice,” he said.
The government is in survival mode, but continues to have the backing of the United States, France and Saudi Arabia.
Many protestors are raising basic issues that go beyond party loyalties.
“Our goal is companionship while the government’s goal is to serve corporate interests,” a primary school teacher who gave his name as Marada told IPS. “We have two million of Lebanon’s four million people that are not represented by these elitists, who only care about their own interests. I’ll stay here as long as it takes. The government didn’t leave us with anything, so we have nothing to lose.”
……
“It’s new for us to be together with all of these other groups,” a student from the Free Patriotic Movement who gave his name as Aran told IPS. “It is good because Muslims, Christians and all of the confessions are here together. We hope this experience will be diffused throughout society.”
Streets lined with concrete barriers and two levels of barbed wire separate the camp from government buildings. Lebanese soldiers keep watch over the protestors. But the protesters seem to ignore them; there is more of a party atmosphere within the camp.

Posted by: annie | Apr 25 2007 19:22 utc | 57

Active boycotts led by the United States also appear to have limited impact. The latest example of this fraying American clout is the boycott of the Hamas-Fateh national unity government in Palestine. Norway, Turkey, the Arab countries and many others have engaged the new Palestinian government. And according to an announcement by the Palestinian information minister on April 16, China and Switzerland have also said they would work with the unity government normally. Many other countries will follow suit. This is partly because if you are an impartial bystander and you are asked to join either the global political morality of the US and UK on one side or the Norwegians, Chinese and Swiss on the other, the Anglo-Americans will lose before the contest starts — given the badly dented perception of them around the world in the wake of their intemperate war-mongering of recent years.
Another trend that may be emerging is the possible broad polarization of two camps in the Middle East and the West. Many in the Middle East see the United States, Israel and many European states as a single political grouping, based most notably on their common policies on Iran’s nuclear industry, the Lebanon war last summer, last year’s Mohammad cartoons controversy, and the boycott of the Hamas-led Palestinian government. Consequently, large swaths of Arab, Iranian and Turkish public opinion — and many governments — are turning hostile to the United States in particular, and even to “the West” more generally. For Washington to alienate simultaneously the three largest Islamic publics in the region — Arabs, Iranians and Turks — is no easy feat. It will go down in history as another negative consequence of misguided Bush Administration policies that have been inordinately driven by Neo-Conservative zealots, pro-Israeli partisans, rightwing American Christian fanatics and other oddballs of a remarkably permissive American political culture.

Posted by: annie | Apr 25 2007 19:31 utc | 58

I just got back from Montpelier where 300 or so Vermonters from all over the state converged to urge/lobby our State House Representatives to support and vote yes on the Impeachment Resolution that passed the State Senate last week.
House Speaker Gaye Symington joined we 300 or so in the House chamber and we literally filled it. She entertained respectful comments from the we the citizens of Vermont for an entire hour. I came prepared to speak but deferred to the articulate and pertinent and intelligent comments/questions that exuded from these passionate activists and common people.
I ended up sitting in the House Legislative seat that was the closest possible to Speaker Symington (purely by happenstance), and could literally see the whites of her eyes. I have to say I was impressed by her from several respects but predominately, for me, was her heartfelt sincerity and balance vis-a-vis the pressure and emotion she must have been feeling. She comes from upper middle class and may lean that way sometimes but today she became just one of us in our common goal to secure our autonomy and freedom from tyranny.
The long and short of it is that she changed her position and allowed it to come to the floor even with her support. A committee chair that I personally know was going to vote no but changed his vote to yes because of Ms Speakers sway to we the people’s voice.
The chamber was too crowded after lunch so I didn’t stay for the vote. I still don’t know even though it is history by now. Less important than today’s vote is the grass root energy of we the people passionately working to try to maintain and even restore our voice, our democracy. The voice of our species rather than that of the dog-eat-dog-entitled and mostly degenerate elite.
I went prepared to speak but ended up personally saying my piece only to each individual representative from my county that I was able to contact and even one I know from outside our district. My rhetoric was basically this:
We are the most feared and hated country since Nazi Germany in the early 1940’s. (Thank you Kurt. You will continue to speak for a long time for a lot of us.)
The parallels are ominous.
I would hate to have been a good German in 1936 that acquiesced to the let’s-work-with-them status quo, and had to face my conscience in 1946, if I had survived.
Working democracy may only exist in the US in the town meeting halls of Vermont and maybe to some degree in it’s legislature. The state, the nation and perhaps the whole world is depending on us right now.

By the time I post this some of you may already know the results. I’m not going to seek it out. I wait until it is my time to know.
LOL to all. You probably can’t even begin to appreciate the support this community gives to me on a daily basis.

Posted by: Juannie | Apr 25 2007 20:18 utc | 59

Good on ya Juannie !

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 25 2007 21:35 utc | 60

4/24/07 Hopsicker: The CIA, Republicans, 5.5 Tons of Cocaine
Also see, Remember the Skyway coke jet?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 25 2007 21:48 utc | 61

addendum:
Prosecutor Purge: Will Duke Cunningham’s Briber Go Free?
Of course…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 25 2007 21:51 utc | 62

been a long day of work and school for me and little to no time to catch up on the world, but i did see a diary at dkos by jerome entitled “yippee (personal news)” and his son seems to have come through the radiotherapy well.

Posted by: conchita | Apr 26 2007 2:39 utc | 63

There was an immense property/housing bubble in Spain. Now it went bust and a lot of Brits who had invested in Spanish holiday homes will go bust too. There are still such bubbles in the US so it’s a good case to learn from.
Spain feels the heat: UK investors left vulnerable as fears of a crash spread

A wave of panic spread through the Spanish bourse over the past week as property developers saw up to 65% of their share price wiped out in frantic trading. The loss of confidence came amid growing signs that the market was already suffering from overbuilding and rising interest rates on euro mortgages. “We will definitely see house price growth stop and a fall in nominal prices is likely in Spain over the next 12 to 18 months,” Ms Choyleva said.

Long-standing worries about Spain’s overheated housing market were transformed into speculation that the bubble had finally burst. There had been unmistakable signs that the construction sector was slowing, as borrowing costs rose in a market where 98% of buyers are on variable rate mortgages. The owners of some 4m holiday homes in Spain, many of them foreigners from Britain and elsewhere, were already concerned at reports that holiday home prices might drop by 10%.

House prices have grown at an average of 15% a year since 1999, though the rate has now slowed to 10%. Further along the chain, Spain’s big banks, including BBVA and Santander, which have lent to both builders and buyers, also saw stocks drop. About half of all Spanish corporate loans are now in the construction and property sector. Pedro Solbes, the economy minister, tried to calm fears. “Are we in a worrying situation? My thesis is that we are not, because family income is consolidating, there are good prospects for employment,” he said in the Senate.

Posted by: b | Apr 26 2007 9:46 utc | 64

@Juannie – don’t give up!
Impeachment measure draws support, but fails in Vermont

Hundreds of people swarmed the State House to lobby lawmakers yesterday as the House debated and ultimately rejected a nonbinding resolution on whether Congress should begin impeachment proceedings against President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.
Lawmakers voted 87 to 60 against the resolution, following the lead of House Speaker Gaye Symington, who said that she opposed the Bush administration but that she believed impeachment would be an unnecessary distraction.

Posted by: b | Apr 26 2007 10:11 utc | 65

More about Wolfowitz: The puppet who cleared the way for Iraq’s destruction

Earlier Wolfowitz had manoeuvred to have himself appointed as viceroy in Iraq. That effort failed. But a newly revealed inquiry by the Pentagon’s inspector general found that, in a foretaste of things to come, he did his best to secure a high-level position in the administration of the conquered country for Riza. Seemingly, he was in awe of her expertise on Iraqi matters. Participants in high level meetings to discuss intelligence on Iraq told me they were startled to hear the deputy secretary of defence invoke his girlfriend: “Shaha says …” Other Pentagon officials were less impressed by her knowledge of the country, not to mention the enormous salary she demanded for her services, and successfully blocked the appointment. Instead, a huge Pentagon contractor, Saic, was directed to hire Riza for a temporary Iraq mission.

Posted by: b | Apr 26 2007 10:19 utc | 66

Damn,
I waited to hear it here first. Thanks b.
I read Speaker Symington wrong. I thought she would support the resolution but I guess it is some sort of victory that she even allowed it to come to the floor. Only one of the representatives I lobbied changed his vote from no to yes. Symington’s argument against it is that our US congressional critters oppose it because it would detract from and water down investigations that are presently going on. So also with the house members that I thought would support it but didn’t. I pray they are correct and Leahy, Sanders and Welch get something done in Washington but I’m not going to hold my breath
Don’t know where to go from here to try to make a difference but I’m not about to give up b.

Posted by: Juannie | Apr 26 2007 11:46 utc | 67

So… what’s going to happen if, when apparently, the US just votes its %16 “controlling” interest in the World Bank and Wolfowitz stays?
There have been threats about no more “replenishments” of funds. I would imagine that it will be a hard sell to EU citizens who’ve been ignored in the choice of World Bank president to have them cough up their traditional 60% when the US’ 16% runs the show.
Perhaps there will be a change in the rules, so that those who fund the bank are actually given control over it?
That’s all agonizingly medium/long range.
The EUs face “will be rubbed in it” immediately by mad George XLIII.
Perhaps many of the staff at the World Bank will resign?
But I hear they are very well paid and just as reluctant as Wolfowitz is to deprive the World Bank of their services.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 26 2007 11:49 utc | 68

Don’t know where to go from here to try to make a difference but I’m not about to give up b.
Good for you Juannie.
I think that in practical terms your speaker is correct. Monolycus pointed out that the votes aren’t there for impeachment. It would be Bill Clinton all over again. Just because the DLC doesn’t want to impeach doesn’t mean it’s a good idea to do so.
In my view the thing to do is to go directly for the War Crimes tribunal. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, Wolfowitz, Feith, Rice… and players to be named later.
Start with Wanted posters. Public Enemy Number One… a la John Dillinger.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 26 2007 11:58 utc | 69

Democratic presidential candidate and New York Senator Hillary Clinton said Tuesday that it might be necessary for America to confront Iran militarily, addressing that possibility more directly than any of the other presidential candidates who spoke this week to the National Jewish Democratic Council.

Whoa. She really wants the job, doesn’t she.

Posted by: DM | Apr 26 2007 12:14 utc | 70

Democratic presidential candidate and New York Senator Hillary Clinton said Tuesday that it might be necessary for America to confront Iran militarily, addressing that possibility more directly than any of the other presidential candidates who spoke this week to the National Jewish Democratic Council.
There is a vacuum growing, spinning like a whirlpool, sucking, sucking… someone is going to be sucked in.
Someone is going to run explicitly as the representative of their individual American constituents and explicitly against those who, like Clinton and the rest of the DLC and RNC, unashamedly sell out to the AIPAC, to Big Oil, to Big War, to Big Pharma.
And that someone is going be swept into office by a tidal wave and these too-clever-by-half, behind-the-curve, triangulating politicians are going to drown in the very same swell. Gagging and choking on the hundreds of millions they’ve taken to betray the electorate.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 26 2007 13:22 utc | 71

Juannie –
sorry to hear you were tossed a loaf of bread at the circus as your enthusiasm and confidence were palpable
the result was as I feared and the mob was appeased
perhaps if the impeachable offences were of a sexual rather than a violent(normal,patriotic)/legal(boring) nature, they’d be more of a distraction
Try going here

Posted by: jcairo | Apr 26 2007 13:35 utc | 72

2nd story from the top, mea culpa

Posted by: jcairo | Apr 26 2007 13:38 utc | 73

a couple more articles on the ONLF attacks on the ethiopian forces guarding chinese oil exploration facilities in ogaden, which i brought up earlier in #43
Ethiopian Defeat at Cobole: An eyewitness account


For the Cobole operations, eyewitnesses put the number of ONLF fighters that took part in this operation between two and three hundred. Eyewitnesses confirmed that ONLF fighters gathered closer to all three military posts around midnight on Monday April 23rd, 2007.
Myriad of local sources agreed that the actual military strike did not start until around 3:00 AM Tuesday morning. It is reported that ONLF having studied the locations of all three military battalions struck the rear battalion first while positioning about hundred fighters in between the first and the second.
While attacking the rear battalion it is said ONLF communication specialists with access to the emergency codes used by these three battalions steered the first battalion away from helping their comrades in arms. It is said these specialists speaking fluent Amharic asked the first battalion to go south for mobbing out operations while they said the third
battalion had the situation under control.
By the time the first battalion realized that they were guided away from the fight, the third and second battalions have already been defeated. Many of the dead Ethiopian military personnel were killed not by ONLF but by indiscriminate shootings carried by confused comrades shooting in all directions.

and a broader look at the ONLF & the situation in ogaden
ONLF rebellion

Ogadenia is a forgotten land wrecked by war and very harsh living conditions. The region, which is still today at the center of the volatile Horn of Africa, has seen little economic progress since its first taste of brief independence in the first Ogaden war of 1977/78. In 1991, the Meles government came into power. The region remains to this day a barren land with only two main roads a few large towns like Kabri Dahar, Jijiga and Quabribayah, which are controlled by government forces trying to tame the rebellion led by the ONLF (Ogaden National Liberation Front). However, to fully understand the war of today’s Ogadenia, one needs to go back further in history and take a look at the European influence in the region.

Posted by: b real | Apr 26 2007 15:51 utc | 74

b real – really reall thank you for this work – elemental for me

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 26 2007 22:45 utc | 75

From Norman Rockwell to Abu Ghraib
…sorry if it’s been posted, just back from the boonies.

Posted by: beq | Apr 27 2007 2:44 utc | 76

since the mainstream press will likely present the ethiopian governments’ claims in shaping public perception on the ogaden/ONLF/”hostage” story, i’m pasting the following in full FWIW
ONLF: OPEN LETTER TO THE PEOPLE AND GOVERNMENT OF CHINA

April 26, 2007 — For nearly one hundred years our people have been subjected to persecution including, killings, torture, arbitrary arrest and other forms of abuse by successive governments in Ethiopia. The current regime in power in Ethiopia led by the Prime Minister Melez Zenawi and his TPLF clique have continued this policy without hesitation. As a result, the Ogaden today is one of the most underdeveloped and repressed areas in the world.
Despite our public declarations that the ONLF stands ready for dialogue with the Ethiopian government in a neutral country and in the presence of a third party arbiter, the current regime has refused. It is because this regime has chosen to pursue a futile military solution in Ogaden that our people have been forced to defend themselves.
In the midst of this struggle, the TPLF regime, hungry for resources, has engaged in efforts to entice foreign oil companies to come and operate in Ogaden. They did this giving assurances of security which were false. In short, they misled many oil companies into believing that they were in effective control of Ogaden. The fact is and has been that they are not.
China is a great world power and with power comes responsibility. The China has recognized the struggles of peoples throughout the world but in the case of Ogaden, it appears that this did not happen. Despite our clear statements that the Ogaden is a battle zone where the torture, killing and arbitrary arrest of our citizens has become commonplace, A Chinese oil company chose to begin oil exploration activities in Ogaden.
We urge the government of China to recognize the plight of our people and cease all cooperation with the Ethiopian government in the area of oil exploration until such time that there is a legitimate form of self-government in Ogaden. The regime of Melez Zenawi is not a popular regime. It has executed civilians in the streets of the capital following rigged elections, it has detained political prisoners in Ogaden, Oromia, Sidama and in many other areas including leaders of one of the member organizations of the Alliance for Freedom & Democracy (AFD) of which we are a member along with the Oromo Liberaton Front (OLF), Coalition for Unity & Democracy (CUD), Sidama Liberation Front (SLF)and the Ethiopian Peoples Patriotic Front (EPPF). It has silenced much of the free press and has persecuted human rights activities. In short, the current regime in power in Ethiopia should be shunned not partnered with by the government of China.
The people of Ogaden will not benefit from oil exploration. Instead, the revenues will be used to enrich the elite members of the TPLF who will in turn use it to continue to persecute our people and many others. The ONLF would like to assure the people of China that your citizens are safe, healthy and well treated. Our primary concern is their security and it was necessary to remove them from the battlefield for their own safety. Chinese citizens were not the target of our attack and their deaths resulted from munitions exploding during the battle. The Ethiopian troops we engaged with took no steps to protect them during the battle and instead some troops treated them as human shields. The death of Chinese citizens in the battle was an unfortunate and unintentional result of war.
The ONLF would like to assure the people and the government of China that your citizens will be reunited with their families as soon and as safely as possible. We have no conditions on this pledge. We are not in the business of taking hostages as the TPLF regime would have you believe and as we indicated, your citizens were removed from the battlefield for their own safety. The ONLF is currently engaged in discussions with the ICRC to facilitate their safe passage back to their families. However, the Ethiopian government is currently engaged in military operations which endanger your citizens. They would like nothing more than for your citizens to lose their lives in our custody and before they are transferred to the ICRC.
The struggle of our people will continue after your citizens are reunited with their families. Many of our citizens will continue to be separated from their families and held in dark prison cells. We hope that the government of China will consider the plight of our people as it engages with the TPLF regime in Ethiopia and show the world that it is a great power which will not invest in areas where there is clear, deliberate and systematic repression of civilians.

Posted by: b real | Apr 27 2007 4:31 utc | 77