Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 25, 2007
NYT Falsifies History on Somalia

In the recent off-topic thread, b real flagged a New York Times piece: In Somalia, Those Who Feed Off Anarchy Fuel It.

"You know, these are some bad people down there" – says the NYT on its front page.

Omar Hussein Ahmed, an olive oil exporter in Mogadishu, the capital, said he and a group of fellow traders recently bought missiles to shoot at government soldiers.

“Taxes are annoying,” he explained.

The writer paints a picture of greedy thugs like Mr. Ahmed, who doesn’t even want to pay taxes, fighting the loyal U.S.-supported, Democracy promissing government. Only some twenty paragraphs later (and not on the front page), we learn that Mr. Ahmed might have some very good reasons to fight:

For many Abgal, an influential subclan of the Hawiye, the last straw came in mid-March when the government raised port taxes by 300 percent. Mr. Ahmed, the olive oil exporter and an Abgal, said that after that, there was a mass Abgal defection to the insurgency. “The government is trying to destroy business as we know it,” he said.

The warlords in the U.S. supported government are trying to squeeze the people who supported the former Islamic court administration out of business.

There are several misleading items like the above in the article. In total it is a shill piece for the thugs and warlords pushed into government with U.S. dollars and military help (directly and by Ethiopian proxies) in a regime change right out of Cheney’s oil mafia handbook.

Where twisted facts and selected sound-bytes are not sufficient, the author falsifies history:

The Islamists seemed to be the perfect solution for the businessmen. They delivered stability, which was good for most business, but they did not confiscate property or levy heavy taxes. They called themselves an administration, not a government.

“Our best days were under them,” said Abdi Ali Jama, who owns an electrical supply shop in Mogadishu.

But then a radical wing took over, and the Islamists declared war on Ethiopia, which commands one of the mightiest armies in Africa.

From the BBC timeline on Somalia we learn how the events really unfolded:

20 July – A column of Ethiopian trucks, more than 100-strong and
including armoured cars, are seen crossing into Somalia. Ethiopia only
admits to having military trainers in the country helping the interim
government.

21 July – The Islamic court leadership orders a "holy war" against Ethiopians in Somalia.

The NYT readers are given no chance to understand that the war declaration came after Ethiopia invaded Somalia. They get the impression that these were just stupid radical Islamists, that did declare war on a superior enemy because they were – well – stupid radical Islamists.

Not by accident, there is also something else missing in the picture the piece is painting – and it is not the U.S. thirst for olive oil.

This is the third regime-change for oil the Bush administration has launched under the false flag of fighting "Islamic terrorism." All three of these had bi-partisan support and support from the New York Times and other major media companies. All three of these were launched with outright false information spread by the independent media to the U.S. people.

All three of these will end in endless quagmires and most probably with solutions unfavorable for the U.S. people. All three of these are outrageous senseless slaughters. But you’ll not learn that reading those papers.


Update: See also Chris Floyd in a parallel post:
The Lies of the Times: NYT Pushes Bush Line on Somalia

Comments

Thanks, b, for calling the NYTimes, again, for its yeomanly work on behalf of those who created the “Clash of Civilizations” as the front for their racist campaign of exploitation in Palestine, Iraq, and now in Somalia.
Thanks to b real for his unceasing work in untangling the mess the msm has made of the reportage on Africa and specifically the Horn.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 25 2007 16:32 utc | 1

latest press release from the somali diaspora network


The Somali Diaspora Network strongly condemns the Ethiopian and the TFG Warlords for the wholesale carnage of innocent civilians and their illegal terror tactics of using collective punishment, and their denial of food and emergency aid to their victims. The international community must immediately intervene to stop the war, the genocide, and the humanitarian crimes being committed against the Somali people. This current brutal campaign by the Ethiopian occupation forces, including mass massacre, shelling, forced displacement, abduction, rape, torture, and ethnic cleansing of innocent civilians in a city as large as Mogadishu, is more brutal and far-reaching in its speed and effect, than the brutality currently in place in Darfur, Sudan. We call for an immediate investigation of these despicable crimes of genocide by the Ethiopian forces and the TFG Warlords.
We applaud the European Union’s positive initiative to investigate war crimes committed by the Ethiopian forces and the TFG Warlords. However, we are deeply disturbed by the continued silence of the international community at large. Of particular concern is the silence of Ban Ki-moon, the Secretary General of the United Nations, and that of the United States Government, and the blind support they lend to the TFG war criminals. The most current carnage follows a visit to Somalia by US Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Jendayi Frazier. In her visit, Ms. Frazier praised both the Ethiopian and the TFG Warlord leadership while ignoring the war crimes perpetrated by the same leaders, and the plight of the Somali people. We believe that the Assistant Secretary’s praise and support of Ethiopia and the TFG Warlord leadership has contributed and fueled the current mayhem and madness in Somalia.
Again, we appeal to the international community to put pressure on the Ethiopian government and the TFG Warlords to immediately and unconditionally cease all hostilities, and to withdraw all Ethiopian forces without any condition or delay. Furthermore, we urge the US Government to re-examine its policy toward Somalia and to stop supporting the illegal occupation of the Ethiopian forces and the TFG Warlords. This blind support of the unpopular and criminal Warlords and the illegal Ethiopian occupation is not only counterproductive to the US interest and efforts on the war on terrorism, but it is also a sure recipe for failure and the continued suffering of the Somali people.

the state dept daily press briefing from tuesday, as i pointed out earlier, is damning.

QUESTION: I have a couple different things. First, sorry if I missed it. Did you give a readout of the Secretary’s meeting with the Ethiopian Foreign Minister yesterday? Can you give a sense of her message on Somalia? It’s my first a question.
MR. MCCORMACK: Well, they had a good discussion about Somalia and the situation there. And the Ethiopian Foreign Minister underlined what the Ethiopian officials have underlined to us several times over and that is that they have no desire to stay there any longer than they are needed. They want to have an AU force in there that is capable of providing a secure environment where you can actually get to a political situation. And those two things are mutually reinforcing — having a stable security environment as well as an open and inclusive political dialogue. I think progress along both of those tracks will help the other.
But we also don’t want to see and they don’t want to see a vacuum open up in Somalia in the wake of a precipitous withdrawal by Ethiopian forces. So what is needed now is for the AU to generate the forces necessary to go in there and supplement the Ugandan forces. And part of our job as well as the job of others with an interest in seeing a different kind of Somalia is to help with the resource end of that because you may have willing AU forces, but they don’t have either the equipment or the required training in order to go into Somalia and perform the kind of mission that the Ethiopians are performing.
The Foreign Minister talked about the fact that there has been violence in Mogadishu, but he believes that the levels of violence are becoming more sporadic in that there are pockets of some of the former members of the Islamic courts who are continuing to fight Ethiopian forces. There have been unfortunately some civilians who’ve lost their lives in that and the Ethiopian Government assured us that they take every possible step to — in all of their operations to ensure that there’s no loss of innocent life. The Secretary emphasized that that is quite important when you’re engaged in these kinds of operations. They also talked a little bit about the regional politics and they talked about the — the Secretary underlined the importance of working with the Eritrean Government to define the border between the two countries. That was really — those were sort of the high points.
QUESTION: Can I just follow up?
MR. MCCORMACK: Yes.
QUESTION: Did they talk about a timeframe for the withdrawal of Ethiopian troops?
MR. MCCORMACK: No, they didn’t talk about a timeframe. No.
QUESTION: Do you agree with the Ethiopian Foreign Minister’s assessment as you just said that the violence in Mogadishu is becoming more sporadic? That seems to be a (inaudible) stretch —
MR. MCCORMACK: Well, it’s —
QUESTION: — considering what’s happened over the last three days.
MR. MCCORMACK: Well, it is more — it is — the violence is centered in Mogadishu and other parts of Somalia. It is more stable and more calm. There are still intense exchanges between the former members of the Islamic Courts, other associated with them, and the Ethiopian forces. But that isn’t, you know, to say that it is more sporadic is not to say it is any less intense.
QUESTION: Does it concern you at all that your little — your opening readout — your opening statements with the exception of some — of the proper names could have applied exactly to the situation in Iraq? Does that bother — does that concern you at all?
MR. MCCORMACK: I’m not sure I see your point, Matt.
QUESTION: That the Ethiopians say that they don’t want to stay there any longer than they’re needed, but they don’t want to leave a vacuum. It just sounds —
MR. MCCORMACK: Right.
QUESTION: — an awful lot like they’re taking a page from the Administration’s thoughts on what to do in Iraq.
MR. MCCORMACK: No. I mean, they’re —
QUESTION: But I guess — so my question is, are you concerned that they might be seeing the beginning or the — in fact, the middle of an Iraq-style insurgency going on maybe — obviously not directed at U.S. soldiers, but the same kind of thing. Are you concerned about that?
MR. MCCORMACK: The situations are completely separate. They are — each is sui generis but you are in each case concerned about leaving the field to a group of violent extremists who do not have an interest in building up the institutions of a democratic state, so in that sense, there are similarities. I think certainly the specifics of each situation are quite different and the histories are quite different. And I think the level of intensity of the fighting in Iraq is quite different than you’re seeing in Somalia and the scale of it is a lot smaller.
That said, certainly, the types of operations that the Ethiopian troops are engaged in and the kind of outreach to communities and the importance of the political component to resolving the underlying circumstances that lead to violence are the classic counterinsurgency kinds of operations and certainly, the Ethiopians understand that as well.
QUESTION: I still have problems with your saying that it is — or the Ethiopians saying it’s more sporadic. I mean, there’s been seven days of intense fighting, shelling in Mogadishu, half a million people have been forced out of the city, they’re sheltering under trees, a humanitarian crisis is evolving.
MR. MCCORMACK: Well, I think that there are a lot of differences over that number, Sue, over the number of displaced persons. You know I’m not in a position to tell you exactly the numbers, but I think the Ethiopians would tell you it’s a quite different number. Now I point that out not to say that I know exactly what the number is, but I’m not sure that the people generating the half million figure are actually in Mogadishu at this point.
Look, there’s intense fighting. It’s — I meant to — perhaps I used the wrong word, but I meant to try to convey to you that this is not — or as we understand it, fighting that is throughout all of Mogadishu, that it is intense fighting, yet it is limited to certain areas of Mogadishu. That doesn’t mean that it hasn’t created displaced — that it hasn’t resulted in displaced persons going to the outskirts of Mogadishu.
QUESTION: Did you discuss the humanitarian, sort of, crisis, as some people are saying it, with the Ethiopians and how aid could reach those who need it because there have been reports the Ethiopians have been, you know, holding up aid getting to the right people and —
MR. MCCORMACK: It wasn’t a topic of conversation with the Secretary, but Jendayi Frazer had a lot of — had extensive meetings with the foreign minister both before and after the meeting with the Secretary. And the humanitarian aid is always at the top of our list and we are quite concerned about the humanitarian situation. We have been for a couple of decades in Somalia, so that is not, in fact, new, that you have people who are wanting and suffering as a result of violence.
Look, the Ethiopian forces went in there to assist with a problem of violent extremism that was growing in Somalia. It was becoming more of a threat to the Somali people, it was becoming more of a threat to the region. And if you’re going to actually get to the root causes of the problem, you need to help stabilize the security situation, which is what the Ethiopian troops are doing, but most importantly, you need to get to the underlying political conflicts that result in this kind of violence, the clan warfare.
You heard from Jendayi Frazer yesterday — that’s why she went to Baidoa, that’s the message the Ethiopians are sending, that is the message that the Somalia Contact Group is sending. That the they need — the TFG, the Transitional Government, needs to reach out and be as inclusive as it possibly can and to all of those who have an interest in a different kind of Somalia, in building up institutions of governance that are responsive to the people as opposed to dictating to the people and serving only their interest, the interest of the government.
QUESTION: Are you calling for a ceasefire in Somalia or are you urging the Ethiopians to go for these insurgents with as much intensity as they could?
MR. MCCORMACK: You don’t want to see any more violence in Somalia. Everybody would like that to be the case, but there are clearly people there, individuals who are intent upon using violence in order to further a so-called political cause. And we have seen that in other areas around the world. And what can’t be allowed to happen is for those forces to gain a foothold to develop a safe haven from which they could possibly launch attacks against other states in the region and further.
QUESTION: So you’re not calling for a ceasefire?
MR. MCCORMACK: We want to see an end to the violence. But the real way to get an end to the violence is (a) stabilize the security situation and (b) find a political situation that is workable for the major political factions in Somalia life that have an interest in actually building a different kind of Somalia as opposed to the one we’ve seen for the past few decades.
Yes, Nicholas.
MR. MCCORMACK: Sean, Jendayi Frazer was very frank yesterday about Eritrea’s role in opposing just about everything that Ethiopia does. I wonder if they came up with the meeting with the Secretary. And Jendayi said that she hadn’t talked to Eritrean officials about this, but is there anything the United States is doing to use perhaps international, multinational fora to get Eritrea to be a more responsible player in African affairs?
MR. MCCORMACK: The most recent effort at that was I know the boundary conference discussions in London — that was — I can’t tell you how many months ago. I’m not aware of any recent efforts, Nicholas.
QUESTION: And it didn’t come up — Eritrea as —
MR. MCCORMACK: They discussed generally the relationship with Eritrea, but it focused mostly on the demarcation of the boundary and that whole process and trying to get that process rolling again.

frazer & meles have been trying to shift the blame to eritrea. recently, the state dept, to gain leverage over the eritrea govt & punish it for objecting to the western designs on the horn, moved eritrea to a top position in its human rights “blacklist.” most human rights monitors (even the state dept reports) will tell you, though, that, while eritrea does have human rights problems, they pale in comparison to that of ethiopia’s regime under meles zenawi. but ethiopia’s government is playing along w/ the GWOT scam, and eritrea is not. instead, they post articles & commentary like the following on their state ministry of information website:
Genocide and War Crimes in Somalia: A Prima Facie Case

An anonymous email from a senior security official sent to the European Union Ambassador Eric Van der Linden, based in Nairobi, Kenya, illustrates the need for a sober and honest analysis of the facts relating to the US-backed Ethiopian invasion and subsequent occupation of Somalia, which have been deliberately and maliciously obfuscated by the deceptive mercenary minority regime in Ethiopia led by Meles Zenawi, and the self serving puppet “Transitional National Government of Somalia” led by Abdullahi Yusuf and Ali Mohammed Ghedi. Here is what the senior security official wrote in the email sent to the EU Ambassador in Kenya:
“…I need to advise you that there are strong grounds to believe that the Ethiopian government and the transitional federal government of Somalia and the African Union (peacekeeping) Force Commander, possibly also including the African Union Head of Mission and other African Union officials have through commission or omission violated the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court…In regard to the above mentioned potential violations of international law there arise urgent questions of responsibility and potential complicity in the commission of war crimes by the European Commission and its partners…”
The official is right in bringing to the attention of the EU Ambassador the numerous violations of international laws of war by the Ethiopian and TNG forces in Somalia. Those of us who have been watching development in Somalia have also warned of Meles Zenawi’s minority regime in Ethiopia, its incurable inferiority complex, its abhorrence of international law and propensity for wanton destruction and violence as early as January 2007. This author had warned in January of 2007 of Ethiopia’s violations of the Geneva Conventions and is not surprised by the e-mail’s contents. It is about time someone paid attention to the crimes being committed in Somalia to “prop up” the illegitimate “TNG” and in the “global war on terror”.

but you won’t find out that information in the western corporate media.

Posted by: b real | Apr 25 2007 16:38 utc | 2

In my time in East Africa the Somali refugees would tell you stories about how they have been fucked over for decades. I knew a “Red Cross” pilot (banned from flying in “White Airspace” who dropped blankets and tents by day, dropped arms at night to various factions and flew in unhindering during the worst fighting to land “Khat” at Mogadishu Intl Airport. Welcome to the West’s creation of their preferred failed state and bogeyman (also Islamic BTW).

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Apr 25 2007 18:47 utc | 3

The video is now online – recommended: Moyers: Bying The War

The program analyzes the stream of unchecked information from administration sources and Iraqi defectors to the mainstream print and broadcast press, which was then seized upon and amplified by an army of pundits. While almost all the claims would eventually prove to be false, the drumbeat of misinformation about WMDs went virtually unchallenged by the media. THE NEW YORK TIMES reported on Iraq’s “worldwide hunt for materials to make an atomic bomb,” but according to Landay, claims by the administration about the possibility of nuclear weapons were highly questionable. Yet, his story citing the “lack of hard evidence of Iraqi weapons” got little play. In fact, throughout the media landscape, stories challenging the official view were often pushed aside while the administration’s claims were given prominence. “From August 2002 until the war was launched in March of 2003 there were about 140 front page pieces in THE WASHINGTON POST making the administration’s case for war,” says Howard Kurtz, the POST’s media critic. “But there was only a handful of stories that ran on the front page that made the opposite case. Or, if not making the opposite case, raised questions.”

Posted by: b | Apr 26 2007 9:50 utc | 4

Remarkable Guardian Editorial: Return of the warlords

That brief period when the Somali Council of Islamic Courts restored order, removed the roadblocks and the rubbish from the streets and reopened the airport and the harbour (before being swept away by US-backed Ethiopian forces last December) is starting to look like a golden age. But it is more complicated than that. The Islamic Courts lost a lot of their credibility among the Hawiye, Somalia’s largest clan, by sending volunteers to their deaths against an Ethiopian army which was better-trained and -equipped.

There are two main questions that Colonel Yusuf’s and Ethiopia’s western backers should now ask themselves. What was gained by encouraging the Ethiopian army to topple the Islamic Courts? The US allowed Ethiopia to arm itself with North Korean weapons and also participated in the turkey shoot by using gunships against suspected insurgents hiding in villages near the Kenyan border. Washington was convinced that the Islamic Courts were sheltering foreign terror suspects. But how many did they get and what price have Somalis paid?
Six weeks ago the TFG said it would end the insurgency in 30 days. An assessment released yesterday by two Chatham House academics, Cedric Barnes and Harun Hassan, claimed that more than 1,000 people were killed and 4,300 wounded in the offensive that followed. It has still not ended, and this leads to the second question. Why is the EU funding the TFG, when its leader is using the presidential compound to shell civilian areas? Is this what state-building is supposed to mean?

Posted by: b | Apr 26 2007 10:08 utc | 5

chris floyd flagged an “honest-to-god piece of journalism” on somalia today in the times of london, of all places
The warlords of death return to steal city’s brief taste of peace

In the past month Ethiopian troops supporting Somalia’s deeply unpopular Government have pounded residential areas controlled by insurgents. The civilian death toll has reached four figures. Thousands more have been maimed and injured. An estimated 320,000 inhabitants — nearly a third of Mogadishu’s population — have fled in terror.
In five days spent in and around a city reverberating with the constant thud of mortars and bursts of gunfire, The Times saw burnt-out slums, huge refugee encampments, hospitals overflowing with the sick and injured, and enough misery to last a lifetime.
It is hard to overstate the suffering of this forgotten country. Last year Somalia tasted peace for the first time in 15 years of bloody civil war when the Islamic Courts movement drove out the warlords who had made their country a byword for anarchy and mayhem. But Washington saw the Courts as a new Taleban sympathetic to al-Qaeda, so it conspired with neighbouring Ethiopia to remove them as part of its War on Terror.
In December Ethiopia’s formidable army routed the Courts, and installed a Somalian “transitional federal government” that includes some of the very warlords the Courts had ousted, and depends for its survival on thousands of soldiers provided by Somalia’s oldest and most bitter enemy. The new Government is now battling against a growing insurgency, and legions of petrified Somalis are caught in the crossfire.

In five days we spoke to scores of ordinary Somalis. Overwhelmingly they loathed a government they consider a puppet of the hated Ethiopians. “As long as the Ethiopians are on Somali soil the insurgents will get support,” said Muhammad Ibrahim, a gardener now living with his wife and three children at the Lafole hospital. “In the six months the Islamic Courts were here, less than 20 people lost their lives through violence. Now that many die in ten minutes,” said Hussein Adow, a businessman waiting outside the Madina hospital.

Posted by: b real | Apr 26 2007 14:41 utc | 6

due to the situation in mogadishu, the amount of reporting from the local media that i’ve been following there is, understandably, sparse right now.
shabelle does have a report up today that ethiopian troops are still shelling neighborhoods, and the fighting is spreading to additional parts of the city.
Fierce fighting in Somalia kills 20 on the eighth straight day

Mogadishu 26, April.07 ( Sh.M.Network) Heavy fighting resumed in the Somali capital Mogadishu on Thursday as Ethiopian soldiers backed by tanks and various types artillery moved to new positions in north of the capital while Islamic insurgents were firing mortar rounds and rockets at the Ethiopian and Somali troops based in the southern parts.
The fighting that is continuing for the eighth straight day spread to new areas in south of Mogadishu. Insurgents were fighting Thursday around Harirayaale neighborhood near the presidential compound. Hundreds of families have still been fleeing the gun-infested city.
At least 20 persons, most of them civilians, were killed in different neighborhoods of the capital today after rockets and tank shells landed at Jamhuriah, Fagah neighborhoods and EX-Control intersection, north of Mogadishu.
Witnesses have told Shabelle that they saw more than 30 Ethiopian tanks on route to Ex-control and Tawfiq areas, strongholds for the insurgents and clan militias.

AP and AFP wire stories that i looked at today essentially repreated the TFG prime minister’s ridiculous stmts that ethiopian troops have “concluded the fighting” by defeating “Al-Qaeda insurgents” and the city will be restored to TFG control (something it has never had in the first place) by friday.
haven’t read it yet, but here’s that chatham house — “one of the world’s leading organizations for the analysis of international issues” — report that has been mentioned in some of today’s press
The Rise and Fall of Mogadishu’s Islamic Courts [PDF 271K]

This new briefing paper, by Cedric Barnes of SOAS and Harun Hassan of the Somali Media Centre, explains the full context of the rise to power and eventual fall of the Islamic Courts of Mogadishu. It argues that the external intervention has destroyed stability, particularly in Mogadishu.

Posted by: b real | Apr 26 2007 15:12 utc | 7

WaPo finally has someone in Addis Ababa with some real perspective (but prints it on page 16 …):
Ethiopia Finds Itself Ensnared in Somalia

On Thursday, the Ethiopian-backed Somali prime minister, Ali Mohamed Gedi, declared that three weeks of heavy fighting was over, a statement tempered by the mortar blasts that continued to boom in the distance, witnesses said.
Meanwhile, a political crisis seems to be worsening, as the Somali transitional government, steadfastly supported by the United States, faces a swell of criticism for ignoring concerns of the city’s dominant Hawiye clan, whose militias form the core of the insurgency and who are motivated not by the ideology of jihad, but power.
“It’s just exactly like the Americans in Iraq,” said Beyene Petros, a member of the Ethiopian Parliament and an early critic of the invasion. “I don’t see how this was a victory. It really was a futile exercise.”

More than 200 FBI and CIA agents have set up camp in the Sheraton Hotel here in Ethiopia’s capital and have been interrogating dozens of detainees — including a U.S. citizen — picked up in Somalia and held without charge and without attorneys in a secret prison somewhere in this city, according to Ethiopian and U.S. officials who say the interrogations are lawful.

Ethiopian officials declined to be interviewed on the subject of Somalia, and a general blackout of information about the war prevails in the capital. Opposition members of Parliament complain that they have not been informed how many Ethiopian soldiers have been killed, how much the war is costing per day or how the government is paying for it.
There is also a sense here that while the invasion served Meles’s own domestic interests, Ethiopia was also doing a job on behalf of the United States and is being left with a financial and military mess.

While the extremist element was always a factor in the Islamic movement, the notion of waging a “war on terror” in Somalia was always an oversimplification of a more complex situation, said Tadesse, the adviser to the Ethiopian government .
The Islamic movement was diverse, made up of extremist military commanders vowing holy war against Ethiopia and moderate leaders, including one, Ibrahim Addow, who taught at American University and holds a U.S. passport.
It was also always fundamentally a Hawiye movement, and Somalis tend to be loyal to clan above all.
Ethiopia and the United States made a mistake, Tadesse and other critics say, by throwing their support entirely behind the transitional government in the name of fighting a terrorist threat that involved just a few individuals, and at the expense of alienating the Hawiye.

Posted by: b | Apr 27 2007 10:08 utc | 8

salim lone on democracynow again today (friday)

So we are seeing the Security Council completely silent while these atrocities are going on. We are seeing Western governments completely silent. Nothing has come out of Washington. Nothing has come out of London. We now see, for the first time on Wednesday, the ambassador of Germany — and Germany holds the EU presidency now — the ambassador released a letter, which he had sent to Abdullah Yusuf, the president of the transitional government. It is a very candid and a very strong letter, and that’s wonderful. However, where was Germany? Where was the EU for all this period? Their silence has really given the green light for the Ethiopians to do the terrible things they’ve been doing.
The death toll now in Somalia is greater than it was in Lebanon. And you will recall, of course, that even then, the big powers — the US, UK, even initially the UN — did not demand a ceasefire. But the world media was full of that story, and there were condemnations around the world for what the Israelis were doing. But, of course, Somalis and Africans don’t count as nearly much, because there has just been no international outcry at all. It’s not just the media. So we really have a problem there.

Posted by: b real | Apr 27 2007 15:36 utc | 9

But, of course, Somalis and Africans don’t count as nearly much, because there has just been no international outcry at all.
when I think of Mogadishu I see one scene, that of crazy looking dark people dragging a dead helicopter pilot thru the streets with his penis flopping around.
I don’t think I am the only one with this visual. nobody gives a crap about them and no one ever will and the players know this. It would be easier to have some sympathy for the Somalis if they had got better press during the first US intervention there. but what we got were reports of the food and supplies being stolen by certain clans. somehow we assume that people in trouble would work together but that certainly was not the case.
It is a damn shame that there is oil there, they already drew some pretty bad cards and now they find themselves in a rigged game.

Posted by: dan of steele | Apr 27 2007 15:58 utc | 10