|
Neocons: Intelligence Rather Than Evidence
This must be about the sickest and funniest line a neoconservative has ever uttered. Frederick Kagan, him of the "surge," writes in a fluff op-ed on Turning the corner in Iraq:
One of the things that struck me on my visit to Iraq this month was a growing Iraqi desire to exercise sovereignty. The insistence on evidence rather than intelligence as the basis for arrests reflects a desire to see the rule of law functioning.
I agree with Kagen’s thought here. Though applying it to him and his AEI companions it is more intelligibly to express it the other way around:
The insistence on intelligence rather than evidence as the basis of actions reflects a desire to see no rule of law functioning.
Ahhh – mushroom clouds …
—
Another thought: The metaphor of "turning the corner" seems to come into vogue again. It implies a change of direction. But in the contorted logic of the neocon crowd it is always used as an argument to "stay the course," i.e. to not change the direction.
Then again, if one turns the corners often enough one ends up at the starting point. Repeating this over and over again one runs in circles. Following the Ledeen mantra "Faster please," one starts to spin. And that’s what "turning the corner" is all about: spin.
Here is some history of such:
Coalition forces have "turned the corner" in western Iraq, said Army Maj. Gen. Charles H. Swannack Jr., 82nd Airborne Division commander, during a Baghdad press conference today. Coalition Has ‘Turned Corner‘ in Western Iraq, Jan. 6, 2004
—
Every piece of good news has been hailed as turning the corner, even as the insurgency has remained stubbornly strong. An End to Illusion, National Review Editors, May 3, 2004
—
Bush’s new refrain will be "we’ve turned a corner, and we’re not turning back," Devenish [the Bush campaign’s communications director,] said. Bush begins important month with heartland trip, July 30, 2004
—
"When it comes to fighting the threats of our world and making America safer and promoting the peace, we’re turning the corner, and we’re not turning back." Bush Speech in Springfield, July 30, 2004
—
Bush speech drops ‘turning the corner‘, CNN, August 13, 2004
—
In the privacy of their E-ring offices, senior Pentagon officials have begun to entertain thoughts that were unimaginable a year ago: Iraq is turning the corner. Pentagon begins to see Iraq momentum shift, Scarborough, Wash. Times, March 28, 2005
—
Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman, […], emerged from a White House meeting Friday saying the president has turned the corner on Iraq in recent weeks. Lieberman: Bush turned corner on Iraq, Dec. 17, 2005
—
Vice President Cheney made his first visit here in more than a decade, praising what he called the "remarkable" turnout by voters in nationwide elections Thursday and telling U.S. troops that the country had "turned the corner." Violence Surges as Cheney Visits Iraq, Dec. 19, 2005
—
"This is a — we believe this is a turning point for the Iraqi citizens, and it’s a new chapter in our partnership." President Discusses Recent Visit to Iraq by Secretary of State Rice and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld , May 1, 2006
—
"It’s certainly not as bad as the situation appeared back in August," Abizaid said, adding that he saw growing confidence among Iraqis in their government. "It’s still at unacceptably high levels," he said of the sect-on-sect violence "I wouldn’t say that we have turned the corner in this regard, but it’s not nearly as bad as it was in August." U.S. Commander Warns Against Iraq Cutoff, November 15, 2006
—
Iraq: A Turning Point – AEI Event With Reports from Iraq from Senators John McCain and Joseph Lieberman American Enterprise Institute, January 5, 2007
—
“I think, in that area, we have turned the corner,” Gen. James T. Conway, commandant of the Marine Corps, said … Commandant: Anbar has turned the corner, April 9, 2007
—
Turning the Corner in Iraq, Krauthammer, April 13, 2007
—
The most that can be said now is that we seem to be turning a corner. We’ve turned the corner, Frederick Kagan, Tuesday April 24, 2007
—
The Rude Pundit has additional examples.
10 easy criticisms criticized. (and JFL- it’s Naomi Wolf, not Klein, fwiw)
1) If G Bush is closing down an open society (whad dat??), the democrats have done nothing to stop it
–and this has what to do with her historical analogies? this idea certainly rings true in the case of the weimar govt. And, just like that govt., the Bushies use the idea of an “existential” threat to the U.S. to accuse any who oppose them of aiding the enemy.
2) checks and balances requires ppl to stand up and provide the balance
–and, again, are you unaware of the millions who have gotten out in the streets in the U.S.? or those who have been surveilled, as Wolf notes, simply for being a peace movt? On the whole, your criticisms don’t really address what Wolf has to say, which is the historical pattern that exists across nations and times that are markers for dictatorships. whether you like what people are doing here has no bearing on what she’s saying…and in fact she’s saying that Americans are looking away as others are denied rights.
3) the horror shock of 9/11 is usually invoked by your war mongering types; bringing it up to show that the US people cringe under threats feeds that meme
-this is a preposterous statement. to show what someone else is doing aids them??? Wolf mentions the way taht Spain is handling the situation differently as an example of an alternative.
4) A parliamentary Republic that can’t take time to read the bills put to it is in deep doo doo, that has nothing to do with fascsim, but everything to do with power and submission to it
actually, the us is not a parliamentary govt. I assume you are aware of the time that the patriot act was passed. there was no way it was not already a fait accompli before the fact. and opponents, such as Daschle and Leahy, were sent anthrax (from a US strain) right at this time. this is classic psy ops. Conyers went on to admit that no one reads all bills because they are marbled with pork for congressional districts. additionally, Matt Tiabbi, among others, has written about the way in which legislation was passed under the republican controlled leg. branch. THEY WOULD HIDE from the Dems on their committees. THEY WOULD FUCKING HIDE.
5) if global islamist threat, terrorism, is a real danger (as she says), then something might be done about it? I mean it either is, or isn’t, and what the Spaniards think about it is immaterial.
really? what is the logic behind this statement? I fail to find any. the point is that the US is using the terror attacks/al q as a way to create fear in a population and thus justify unconstitutional acts. the dlc, fuckers that they are, cannot see what is happening right under their noses. when the shit goes down and then, inevitably fails, maybe the dlc’er will be treated like Nazi sympathizers after WWII…Carvell is already bald, tho, so maybe they’ll have to put hair on his head, rather than shave it (the punishment for fucking a nazi.)
do you really think that international diplomacy operates in a vacuum, that competing concerns and interest groups do not have a bearing upon what policy is made (c.f. John Bolton) or that it is realistic to have war without end rather than police methods and diplomacy?
honestly, please explain what you mean by this. it makes no sense.
6) The US imprisoned the Japanese. The French took notes and spied and sent the Jews off. And so on. As pointed out. Err..well what?
Err..well these people were both citizens of the countries where they live. their property was confiscated and, in the case of the Jews, they were murdered as though this was a business…assembly line genocide.
7) In Iraq, about 1 million killed, and 4 million displaced. AH! Detainee abuses! Locking people up and raping / torturing them is unspeakable, of course it is. Committing genocide – that will NOT be mentioned.
again, what the fuck are you talking about? this article is about ten common traits of fascism that are set up across cultures. she is addressing the encroaching fascism, just as in Meyer’s book, We thought we were free. or Sebastian Haffner’s Defying Hitler…both about the early stages of fascism. Germany and France, among others, had just had the dirtiest war in history, using gas attacks and blowing off people’s faces and sending them back home to beg on the streets…if they were lucky enough not to be buried alive by a bomb.
which has nothing to do with the social changes that are a prelude to fascism.
8) thugs are everywhere, sure, for ex. in the local bank, on the street, etc. Thugs in America – Klein sees angry young Repub. men menacing poll workers! What about killing a million ppl?
again, noirette, do you understand the concept of writing an article? you have a topic and you create a topic sentence. from this you develop arguments that both support and deny your topic. if you stray from that topic, you then writing another article. in a short piece, you do not stray from the topic because you don’t have time to meander, New Yorker style, into the vagaries of orchid fertilization. You want an article about the killing…write it yourself. but how in the hell can you criticise someone for writing an article because it doesn’t address the issues you want to mention instead?
9) No Americans have been imprisoned, tortured, raped, starved, terminally abused, bombed, shot, following ‘no fly lists.’ they have been harassed, inconvenienced, maybe even held for 2-3 days. Completely stupid, disgusting, but not commensurate.
Jose Padilla. american citizen. most likely his mind is broken. a british journalist was in detention for days because she didn’t have the correct visa…that said journalist, not tourist, since journalists are required to have special visas now. a man whose wife lives in Colorado was picked up and held w/o charges and then deported because he was of middle eastern descent..this was at the first of the year. a canadian man was sent to Syria to be tortured…not american, but before now borders were open b/t the two nations.
and, again, you are making a comparison to the way Americans are treated compared to the way they are treating others. This has nothing, nothing at all to do with this article.
any point you would like to make is lost by the straw man you are batting at…well, duh, yes iraq is the big mess. but if you think that situation would be made better by a further descent into fascism, I’ve got a bunker to sell you in Berlin.
10) I give up. I’m off.
and if this happens to be a criticism of me for joking with b about leaving… LOL.
I’ve lived overseas before, noted my affinity for many things and people I’ve known who live in Europe, thought about moving off and on for years, long before Bush, and my alienation from the country the right wing would have this be has been unstinting. I suppose all those germans who left weren’t good enough for you either…how dare they not stay and suffer, once the apparatus was in place. how dare they not sacrifice their children.
I would suggest that you develop your arguments a bit better and address the actual content of an article. if you just want to criticize someone’s desire to leave, you don’t need to waste time on the straw man of…butbutbut Iraq.
but that’s just my opinion. ymmv
Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 25 2007 3:17 utc | 25
|