Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 7, 2007
Iran-Contra Again

Nobody should be surprised that the criminals who did the former deals are committing the same crimes today again. Iran-Contra:

involved several members of the Reagan Administration who in 1986 helped to illegally sell arms to Iran, an avowed enemy, and used the proceeds to fund, also illegally, the Contras, a right-wing guerrilla organization in Nicaragua.

Hey, they got pardoned once, so why not try a similar crime again today?

Three months after the United States successfully pressed the United Nations to impose strict sanctions on North Korea because of the country’s nuclear test, Bush administration officials allowed Ethiopia to complete a secret arms purchase from the North, in what appears to be a violation of the restrictions, according to senior American officials.

The rest of the linked NYT piece is filled with insane citings of one jobless John Bolton … I’ll skip those …

Lets read reporters:

The United States has quietly poured weapons and military advisers into Ethiopia, whose recent invasion of Somalia opened a new front in the Bush administration’s war on terrorism.

A Christian-led nation in sub-Saharan Africa, surrounded almost entirely by Muslim states, Ethiopia has received nearly $20 million in U.S. military aid since late 2002. That’s more than any country in the region except Djibouti.


The U.S. and Ethiopian militaries have "a close working relationship," Pentagon spokesman Lt. Cmdr. Joe Carpenter said. The ties include intelligence sharing, arms aid and training that gives the Ethiopians "the capacity to defend their borders and intercept terrorists and weapons of mass destruction," he said.

$20 million is certainly not the price the North Koreans asked for and not what the Ethiopian dictator spends on current attacks in Somalia. Now let’s guess where the money for these weapons and other things delivered to and by the Ethiopians has come from:

When challenged by a BBC journalist about the consequences of the disappearance without trace of billions of dollars, he pointed out that it was irrelevant where the money had gone because it was Iraqi funds, not U.S. taxpayers’ money. The $12 billion came from Iraqi assets seized after the first Gulf War, from the sale of Iraqi oil, and from surplus payments from the UN oil-for-food program. The $12 billion is not included in the $400 billion spent by the U.S. in Iraq since March 2003.

Money vanishes in one place and weapons are bought in another place with unknown funds – both places under the same White House supervised CentCom control – guess what …

Comments

Wha’d ya expect from a criminal?
There are nineteen Ways of Looking at Wang Wei…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 7 2007 21:48 utc | 1

how about 2.3 trillion missing? they can wage war anywhere.

Posted by: annie | Apr 7 2007 22:45 utc | 2

The sinews of war, a limitless supply of money.
Marcus Tullius Cicero

Posted by: jcairo | Apr 7 2007 23:20 utc | 3

“Money vanishes in one place and weapons are bought in another place with unknown funds – both places under the same White House supervised CentCom control…”
Well caught, b. Wonder who does the book-keeping for the “other” CIA?

Posted by: PeeDee | Apr 8 2007 7:07 utc | 4

Wonder who does the book-keeping
The Next Crusade
the article doesn’t really kickoff til pg 6

At the World Bank, Wolfowitz soon made it clear that he would leave many of his administrative duties to others. At internal meetings, he indicated the policy areas that were important to him, but he seldom got involved in the details of implementing them. Rather than appointing bank staffers as his principal aides, as previous presidents had done, Wolfowitz hired two American political operatives who were closely associated with the war in Iraq: Robin Cleveland, who had been the associate director for National Security Programs at the White House Office of Management and Budget; and Kevin Kellems, who had been with Wolfowitz at the Pentagon. Perhaps inevitably, Cleveland and Kellems antagonized many on the bank’s staff. “Their attitude was: We are brighter than other people, we know more than other people,” a bank veteran who recently left told me. “They were unaccountable because they had no direct-line authority. Officially, they were just advisers to the president, but in fact they were calling the shots.”
Cleveland, in particular, incited hostility. On Capitol Hill, where she had worked for Republican Senator Mitch McConnell, of Kentucky, she was known as “the dragon lady,” because of her aggressive approach to negotiations. In 2002, she moved to the Office of Management and Budget, where she helped to provide financing for the Iraq war, and for President Bush’s AIDS initiative. More than half a dozen current and former bank staff members gave me critical assessments of Cleveland. “She is vindictive to the core,” one said. Cleveland, who often acts as a trouble-shooter for Wolfowitz, conceded that she can be demanding. “I am impatient, and I apologize for that, but it’s impatience in trying to get things done,” she said. “We are only here for a short time, and there are incredibly important things to do.” Kellems, a low-key Midwesterner, provoked less controversy at the bank, though some called him “the keeper of the comb”—a reference to the film “Fahrenheit 9/11,” in which Wolfowitz is shown preparing for a television appearance by spitting on his comb before applying it to his hair. ,/blockquote>

Posted by: annie | Apr 8 2007 9:14 utc | 5

using proxy armies to take out regimes not on the western teat? the reagan doctrine (nicaragua, angola, afghanistan, cambodia, …) lives on.

Posted by: b real | Apr 9 2007 4:35 utc | 6