Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 22, 2007
Facing A Skilled, Flexible Foe

On another recent night raid near Muqdadiyah — based on a tip from the Iraqi police — U.S. soldiers rolled out in six Humvees expecting to find a half-dozen al-Qaeda in Iraq members in a meeting.

Instead they found a crying mother and her terrified 13-year-old boy.

"Tell him, since he’s the oldest one in the house, he’s the man of the house, he needs to man-up and stop hiding behind his mother," 1st Lt. Christopher Nogle, 23, of Orlando, instructed his interpreter.

The boy covered his face and sobbed. It was 3 in the morning. He said he didn’t know where his father had gone.

"Does he love his father?" Nogle asked. "Does he want to see him again?"

The small barefoot boy shook with fear and said nothing.

"Ask him where his father hides his weapons," Nogle demanded.

"I swear to God I don’t know," the boy said.

"He is not a man, he is scared," said his mother, who was also wailing.

"He needs to quit crying. He’s responsible for everybody in here right now since his father left; his father abandoned everybody else," Nogle told the boy through his interpreter. "Tell him when his father comes back later tonight or tomorrow that he needs to have a talk with his father, that his father is doing very bad things and it’s getting the whole family in trouble."

Before the soldiers left, an Iraqi police officer brandished two large buck knives in front of the boy’s face. Nobody was arrested.
Troops in Diyala Face A Skilled, Flexible Foe

You can reach Lt. Hearts-and-Minds Chris Nogle at christopher.nogle1@us.army.mil

Pat Lang compares the scene with this picture.

I find it a quite idealized and sanitized narrative painting. It doesn’t look like a rushed inquisition after midnight.

The Iraqi boy was certainly not dressed in glittering blue at 3 o’clock at night. Military police in battle dress looks much more frightening than those Parliamentarians in the picture.

But then, the conflict inside the boy when the Lt. asks: "Does he want to see [his father] again?" may well be just the same.

UPDATE: Though the lighting is too good, this picture via Iraq Today may capture a bit of the atmosphere.

Comments

“We didn’t runaway because we are terrorist,” the note said. “We run away because we afrad of you.”
the Muqdadiyah wall is being built right now.

Posted by: annie | Apr 22 2007 19:53 utc | 1

Good thing for this “family of terrorists” that the press was present. Otherwise, the woman and child would likely have been arrested and held as hostages until this man turned himself in. Meanwhile, the SpecOp/Contractors would subject the mother and young boy to (“not-torture”) interrogation.
If Lt. Nogle and the other junior officer had one ounce of moral character they would resign their commissions. Being an officer in the US Military does not mean abandoning all sense of right and wrong, does not mean rejecting personal responsibility, does not mean subjugating ones moral choices to the orders of another. If “duty” and military obedience requires the relinquishment of free-will and moral choice than how can a man claim to be a rational being created in God’s image? Such a creature is little more that a vicious pit-bull obediently attacking whatever is but before it without reason or understanding.
Step One: Bomb and invade a country over complete lies of WMDs and all the other fabricated garbage.
Step Two: Continue to kill and brutalize the population, take women and children hostage, and let sadistic perverts run the military prisons.
Step Three: Can’t stop now or the terrified 13-year-old Iraqi children win. Every Iraqi who isn’t happy to have the US Military as their overlords is the enemy.
===========================

Posted by: Sgt.York | Apr 22 2007 22:40 utc | 2

I sent Nogle an email. I just finished watching a 60 minutes program on how the Iraqis supposedly think the US forces are helpful in Iraq – they did rescue an Iraqi doctor who was under fire, and took the family to the green zone. Now, two months later, they are on their own again.
I wonder when this republican-bush-cheney nightmare will end.
Rove is coming to Asheville NC next Saturday. Let me know if you want details.

Posted by: Susan | Apr 22 2007 23:51 utc | 3

Thanks for the email address of Lieutenant Christopher Nogle b. I sent him an email. You all might encourage him to do the right thing as well. God knows he needs it where he is now.

Dear Lieutenant Christopher Nagle,
I read of your exploits “near Muqdadiyah” in the Washington Post.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/21/AR2007042101467_pf.html
I assume you realize that you terrorized that mother and her child? What does that make you then?
I realize that you are in the middle of a war and have to save yourself and the troops under your command. But the reason you have to do that is because your nation has sent you to prosecute the aggressive invasion and occupation of a foreign land. Of course the people there hate you and want you out of their country. Wouldn’t you want an invading Iraqi army out of Orlando? I’ll bet you’d be a leading “insurgent”! And thank you for your bravery and assumption of command, Sir! You’d have more than harsh words for the Iraqi invader who terrified your wife and thirteen year old son.
The present Neocon regime in the US has sent you to murder and/or be murdered in Iraq. The present Neocon regime in the US represents the Big Oil, Big War, and Big Israel lobbies. It doesn’t represent my interests or the interests of other Americans… it certainly hasn’t got your best interests, or the best interests of the men under you at heart! You are nothing but cannon fodder to them. They won’t even take care of you after they’ve got you blown up on their god forsaken mission in Iraq. We will. The American people will, when you return from Iraq and when you and we rest control of our government from the War Criminals presently in charge.
It’s never too late to take command. You’re “the oldest” in your squad. You need to “man up”, to take responsibility for your men in the present, disastrous circumstances you find yourselves in. Stop hiding behind the false patriotism for the “fatherland” that the Neocons have tried to instill in you and in all of us Americans with their claim that the Iraqis they’ve sent you to subjugate and abuse are our enemies. Our enemies, yours and mine, are in Washington DC.
You’re responsible for the lives of everyone under your command and for the lives of the Iraqis with whom you come in contact. Your Commander in Chief has abandoned you in the field of his disgraceful, shocking and awful invasion and occupation.
You need to have a talk with your men. Tell them that they are being used by the politicians in Washington for the benefit of Big Oil, Big War, and Big Israel, but that if you and they stick together and maintain your humanity towards each other and towards the Iraqi people that you can yet avoid collaboration with the War Criminals in Washington DC, that you can save your own lives as well as the lives of innocent Iraqis. That you can come back home with your heads held high in the knowledge that you performed as human beings in a truly monstrous situation.
All of us in America and around the world support you, our fellow Americans so deceitfully and cruelly used by the criminal Neocon regime in Washington DC. Do your best in Iraq for yourselves and for the Iraqis and return home safe and sound.
It’s not the situation you find yourself in but what you do when you find yourself that defines the man. I know you won’t be found wanting.

John Francis Lee
261/3 Th. SonKhongLuang Soi 12
Mueang Chiangrai 57000
Thailand

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 23 2007 0:45 utc | 4

wow, cool letter JLF. i will write something also. thanks for the inspiration.
susan, of course i want to hear everything..

Posted by: annie | Apr 23 2007 0:55 utc | 5

videovets against the war

Posted by: annie | Apr 23 2007 1:22 utc | 6

excellent letter, jfl. you’ve inspired me to write too. thank you for sharing.

Posted by: conchita | Apr 23 2007 4:12 utc | 7

The actions of “big man” Nogle are reprehensible; but he is part of a larger gang of murderous thugs that have terrorized the people of Mesopotamia for years. Was he not just as involved in evil a week before these actions?
What do I say to a man from my own town who is half way around the globe killing civilians in an illegal war?

Posted by: bucky | Apr 23 2007 10:16 utc | 8

Tell him to stop Bucky. That it’s never to late to do the right thing. That everyone that read the article is pulling for him to straighten up and be the backbone of his unit, to bing ’em home safe and with their heads held high.
But spell his name right! I wrote ‘Nagle’… it’s ‘Nogle’!

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 23 2007 10:53 utc | 9


Fleeing “Freedom and Democracy”

I consider this TomDispatch a must read. The story is also highlighted today in http://www.antwar.com. Below are some highlights but the entire article is informative from beginning to end. My first thought though is the following: The shame of the United States in causing this catastrophe is plain. And the U.S. is doing little to nothing in helping the Iraqi refugees – both internal and external refugees. But where now are other nations of the World in helping the poor Iraqis? And there are numerous refugees coming from Afganistgan, Palestine, etc.


The Iraqi Crisis That Has No Name
By Dahr Jamail

For the last two weeks, I’ve been in Syria, visiting refugee centers and camps, the offices and employees of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and poor neighborhoods in Damascus that are filling up with desperate, almost penniless Iraqi refugees, sometimes living 15 to a room. In statistical and human terms, these few days offered a small window into the magnitude of a catastrophe that is still unfolding and shows no sign of abating in any immediately imaginable future.
Let’s start with the numbers, inadequate as they are. The latest UN figures concerning the refugee crisis in Iraq indicate that between 1-1.2 million Iraqis have fled across the border into Syria; about 750,000 have crossed into Jordan (increasing its modest population of 5.5 million by 14%); at least another 150,000 have made it to Lebanon; over 150,000 have emigrated to Egypt; and — these figures are the trickiest of all — over 1.9 million are now estimated to have been internally displaced by civil war and sectarian cleansing within Iraq.

According to Wilkes, the Syrian government, using tallies taken from its southern border posts, privately estimates the number to be closer to 1.4-1.5 million Iraqis in Syria. The UNHCR operation here, desperately under-funded and short of staff, does not have people on the border tallying numbers and has no way to check on the real magnitude of the disaster underway.

[Refugees are waiting months to be seen]
On one of my Monday visits, as my friend Jeff and I approached the warehouse-turned-processing center there were more than 1,000 Iraqis crowded around the entrance hoping to get in. Taxis honked their way through the gathering crowds of refugees, each of whom held a number representing his or her place in line, along with passports and other required papers.
As we were being escorted inside the center by UNHCR public information assistant Adham Mardini, he told us that the previous day between 6,000 and 7,000 Iraqi refugees had descended on the place. On that day alone, 2,179 future appointments had been scheduled, each representing an average of 3.6 people, since many of them are set by the heads of families.

To make matters worse, UNHCR officials have been noticing an increase in Kurdish refugees from the previously more peaceable northern regions of Iraq. “Over 50% of all newcomers in the last two weeks are Kurds,” Kalkan, the UNHCR veteran of 15 years whom I’d spoken with before, says as he joins Mardini and me at the door. The two of them express a modest mix of frustration and discouragement, given the circumstances. After all, just as UNHCR in Damascus begins to ramp up to accommodate the massive numbers of refugees they have to deal with, the flow increases confoundingly.

Posted by: Rick | Apr 23 2007 13:18 utc | 10

Two points regarding the refugee crisis:
-Why are Kurds fleeing to Syria?
-In none of these reports have I read of people fleeing to Iran. That is quite odd as I am sure some are fleeing to Iran.

Posted by: b | Apr 23 2007 13:47 utc | 11

The Spirit of Cromwell never died out, it just emigrated to America with the Puritan settlers. Now we are busy re-esporting it to the rest of the world.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Apr 23 2007 14:57 utc | 12

b #10,
– I thought the recent influx of Kurdish refugees was strange also. Either these are Kurds that are not completely within the safety of Kurdish areas, and access routes for refuge within is somehow restricted or too dangerous, or things of late are not as great as we are led to believe in the Kurdish areas.
– My guess, and it is purely a guess, is that the the Iranian government is probably a little hush with this type of information, especially with Western Journalists. I would think any U.S. attempts to stop Iraq/Iran border crossings by refugees would be futile, but I really don’t know.

Posted by: Rick | Apr 23 2007 15:10 utc | 13

Error regarding my post #13, I meant to reference b’s questions at post 11, not 10.

Posted by: Rick | Apr 23 2007 15:12 utc | 14

One wonders when the U.S. will order a coup against the elected Maliki government. One week, two weeks?
U.S. to ‘respect’ Iraqi wishes for wall

The American ambassador said Monday the U.S. would “respect the wishes” of the Iraqi government after the prime minister ordered a halt to construction of a three-mile wall separating a Sunni enclave from surrounding Shiite areas in Baghdad.

However, confusion persisted about whether the plan would continue in some form: The chief Iraqi military spokesman said Monday the prime minister was responding to exaggerated reports about the barrier.
“We will continue to construct the security barriers in the Azamiyah neighborhood. This is a technical issue,” Brig. Gen. Qassim al-Moussawi said. “Setting up barriers is one thing and building barriers is another. These are moveable barriers that can be removed.”

“There are other methods to protect neighborhoods,” al-Maliki said Sunday in his first public comments on the issue, “but I should point out that the goal was not to separate, but to protect.”
“This wall reminds us of other walls that we reject, so I’ve ordered it to stop and to find other means of protection for the neighborhoods,” he added during a televised live news conference during a state visit to Cairo, Egypt.
Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, a U.S. military spokesman, indicated that there may have been a miscommunication.
“Discussions on a local level may not have been conveyed to the highest levels of the Iraqi government,” Garver said.

There is one wall people in the Middle East have in mind and that’s in Palestine. Trying to build another one will immediately be seen as copying Israel. No Iraqi leader can agree to walls and keep some public standing.

Posted by: b | Apr 23 2007 16:19 utc | 15

I doubt the moral arguments will get to our boy nogle, but.This might get to him

Posted by: anna missed | Apr 23 2007 17:55 utc | 16

I got an answer from Nogle and his mommy!! They are both idiots.
I asked permission to reprint the emails. Too bad the mommy of the little boy cannot give us an answer.

Posted by: Susan – NC | Apr 23 2007 17:59 utc | 17

Before the soldiers left, an Iraqi police officer brandished two large buck knives in front of the boy’s face. Nobody was arrested.
When will it come out that Geoff Miller was to interogations at Abu Ghraib as John Negroponte was to Iraqi government counter-insurgency?

Posted by: bcg | Apr 23 2007 18:31 utc | 18

I got an answer from Nogle’s mom as well. I hesitate to call her an idiot. I am of the opinion that we are all just poor humans. She has two sons who’ve served in Iraq, and her husband was a career soldier. She marshalls the usual “arguments” for the war in Iraq, circling the wagons around her family against criticism from without.
I wrote back that time will tell what’s been going on in the US and the Middle East for the past six years, and that I had no interest in fighting with her. It’s happenstance that I had her sons e-mail address and not some other. I wrote that I hoped both her sons came home from Iraq safe and sound.
I don’t know that she’ll believe history’s judgement even when it is generally accepted. There are plenty of people who still defend the Vietnam war. Well, not plenty, but any is more than enough.
Everyone doesn’t have to do the right thing. Just most of us. This is politics, not religion. And I think, I hope, that more and more people in the military and the general population are coming around. Those in military who are not “company” folks, who are economic draftees, are surely much more acutely aware than we are of just how monstrous is this error in Iraq. They’re on the scene.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 24 2007 0:53 utc | 19

b,
I don’t understand why al Maliki doesn’t just call the US’ bluff. He did order the wall building to stop, according to Al Jazeera. If he ordered the occupation troops out of the country, and called upon the UN to support the sovereign Iraqi nation… what would happen?
There might be a US backed “coup”. But if he doesn’t get the US Oil bill through parliament there’s going to be a coup anyway. And if he does he’s dead meat.
Ordering an end to the occupation has a tremendous upside, can you imagine the support he’d receive from ordinary Iraqis? The downside seems discounted.
Unless, of course, al Maliki really is a loyal employee of the Americans.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 24 2007 1:05 utc | 20

what would happen?

Maliki murdered by US troops terrorists, US takes charge of the situation by bombing a lot of villages terrorists, and the next puppet president will be more careful?

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Apr 24 2007 1:50 utc | 21

askod:
The point is that all of that is very likely to happen anyway… and something other than that Might Happen is he took the bull by the horns.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 24 2007 2:00 utc | 22

Skilled, flexible and lethal foe indeed.

Posted by: ran | Apr 24 2007 2:01 utc | 23

It would be nice if Maliki fought back, but I think he will rather be retired to some holiday resort with the bundles of cash he has stolen.

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Apr 24 2007 11:11 utc | 24

Work on Baghdad wall continues despite premier’s opposition

Baghdad- The construction of a three-mile wall around a Sunni neighbourhood in Baghdad continued Monday, the military spokesman for the Iraqi government said, despite Premier Nuri al-Maliki’s opposition to the plan.

Looks like Al Maliki is invisible and inaudible. Like the chesire cat just his smile is left. How long before that fades away.
The occupation doesn’t even pretend to pay attention to the head of the sovereign state of Iraq. They’ve lined up their own chain of command beneath him.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 24 2007 14:08 utc | 25

Frustration Over Wall Unites Sunni and Shiite

And it has proved to be an unlikely boon for Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, making the Shiite politician — at least for now — into a champion for Sunnis because he publicly opposed the wall’s construction.
At a rally on Monday, residents of the Sunni Arab neighborhood of Adhamiya pledged support for Mr. Maliki because of his declaration on Sunday in Cairo that construction of the wall around their neighborhood must stop. Their endorsement was all the more telling because many Sunnis see Mr. Maliki as the representative of a government bent on Sunni oppression.
“My view of Maliki has changed since I heard of this news, and we hope he would be able to carry out this decision,” to stop the wall’s construction, said Um Mohammed, a teacher in Adhamiya.
“We denounce the building of the wall, which will increase the sectarian rift,” she said as she stood with more than 1,000 neighborhood residents at the peaceful protest.

Mr. Maliki’s decision to speak out against the wall was read on the streets as a moment of defiant Iraqi sovereignty in the face of the Americans, whom the vast majority of Iraqis view as an occupying force. Despite his government’s backing of the overall security plan, Mr. Maliki has managed to appear to be a defender of the interests of the common citizen.
Sameer al-Obeidi, the imam of the Abu Khanifa mosque, one of the most influential Sunni Arab mosques in the city, applauded Mr. Maliki. “We shake hands with the government in such stands,” he said.
The American involvement in the wall’s construction has united Iraqis of different sects. Sunni political parties, as well as some Shiite groups, strongly oppose the wall. Shiite groups fear that though Sunni Arab neighborhoods are the ones being cordoned off this week, next month it could be Shiite areas as well.

Al-Maliki should order the occupation out of sovereign Iraq. He ought to seize the moment. He has nothing to lose at this point.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 25 2007 12:13 utc | 26

War Causes Air Force Sergeant to Change Course

Slocum is joining the ranks of a growing number of patriotic Americans who entered the military to serve their country, and who have come to believe they have an obligation to speak out against the ongoing war in Iraq. It’s easy enough for city-dwelling hipsters to speak against the Iraq war, but for Chief Master Sergeant Slocum and thousands like him around the country, an earnest objection to the war has caused him to leave everything he has known for the past 21 years and to re-envision the scope of his entire life.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 26 2007 13:50 utc | 27

WTF? 4 years of “superior” U.S. military might and TALKING HEADS say the enemy is strong enough to follow us home if we leave?

Posted by: gus | Apr 26 2007 16:29 utc | 28

To all who have posted comments:
I am a pretty open-minded person, believe it or not. The article sliced a moment in time in a combat environment and portrayed it to the world as daily operations. I have not killed or tortured any women or children. I have not killed or tortured innocent civilians. None of my Soldiers have done so either. I know this because we have not killed or tortured anybody since we have been here. The situations require very precise execution of every mission in order to minimize collateral damage. We take that into account before we execute any mission. We have been attacked numerous times by all types of enemy activities. Our response has been measured and proportional to the force being used against us. We have detained more suspects (caught in a hostile act) than I can remember. There are many instances where we are legally justified to utilize lethal force on individuals based on their actions, but we have instead made the extra effort to detain them without engaging them. If we were truly war-mongers and barbarians, wouldn’t we have shot them D-E-D dead when given the chance? We hold ourselves to high standards.
The questions asked to the 13 year old male were not threats. I was not threatening or implying that the family would not see the man again for failing to cooperate with us. There are many instances where a father’s actions endanger his entire family and neighbors – much like an abusive father or one involved in other criminal activities in the states. For instance, if a young American man with wife/girlfriend and children is involved in gang activities, rival gangs may target his family if they cannot locate the man. The various religious sects and militias here are very similar to rival gangs in our country. If the family did not want any further involvement with the man because of the hazards of his activities, we have ways to relocate them and provide a safer environment. Leave it to the media to cast the dark shadow.
I take full responsibility for the actions of all of my Soldiers, myself, and the way the incident was portrayed in the Washington Post. Although it was not the case, my wording was not catered to media-friendly words that could not possibly be used against me. I was doing the same thing I tell all of my Soldiers anytime a member of the media or high-ranking official is with us – just do like we always do we are not doing anything wrong.
I appreciate the words of encouragement to remain morally straight and ensure my Soldiers remained focused on right and wrong. I already know that, believe that, and live by it, but it is always encouraging to hear that there are still others who will openly speak about the virtue of doing the right thing, even when no one is watching.
To all those who promised they would email me, Susan ensured my email address was made public, but I only received messages from her and John Francis Lee. SGT York – thank you for weighing in, but I do not agree and am disappointed. Either you naively bought into the first report (Washington Post) which any Soldier knows is always wrong due to other factors, or you are only using that as your name on the blog. Either way, I am disappointed.
And finally to address the politics of the situation and all the above comments – regardless of the political reasons we are here, who agrees with it or disagrees with it, and how long we are ultimately going to be here – fortunately for us, we do not have the time in our days to get wrapped up in it, so I thank all the Americans at home who are remaining active for us. Regardless of opinions, the point is that Americans have the freedom to have differing opinions, and not execute each other over it. Appreciate that freedom.

Posted by: Nogle “The Barbarian” – thanks Susan | Apr 26 2007 23:34 utc | 29

Susan did not ensure that your email was made public. I am a commenter on this blog, NOT the blog writer or owner. It amazes me how you jump to conclusions without regard to the facts.
I would say that comment “Does he want to see him again?” is very much a threat, along with the waving of knifes in his face. He was a 13 year old child, and this interaction was surely abuse. It is continues, I would call it torture.
And I am not the one who passed emails around – you are the one who forwarded my email. This is fine with me, but generally it is considered bad form to reprint other’s emails without asking permission.
Your little brother is the smartest one in the family, by the way.

Posted by: Susan | Apr 27 2007 1:07 utc | 30

Thanks for taking the time to reply to us, Lieutenant Christopher Nogle.
I am very glad to hear that neither you nor your men have killed or tortured anyone.
We have detained more suspects (caught in a hostile act) than I can remember.
I hope those you have detained have not been killed or tortured. I read that the US has imprisoned 18,000+ Iraqis. I assume their “crime” is opposing, in one way or another, the destruction and occupation of their country. I realize that you have a limited field of command and cannot be held accountable for the War Crimes of your superiors.
There are many instances where a father’s actions endanger his entire family and neighbors – much like an abusive father or one involved in other criminal activities in the states.
If the Iraqis were occupying Orlando I’m quite sure that ALL of your activities would be endangering your entire family and all of your neighbors. Faced with aggression and occupation there are some things you just have to do.
If the family did not want any further involvement with the man because of the hazards of his activities, we have ways to relocate them and provide a safer environment.
I’m sure you do have ways to do that. I read that the US is now transforming Iraqi neighborhoods into Concentration Camps on the Israeli model in Palestine.
The IDF has occupied “the territories” since well before you were born. Some of them have refused to continue to do so on the grounds that it is wrong, and that it is destroying the soul of their nation :
Refuser Solidarity Network
Courage to Refuse
New Profile
(continued below, in an effort to evade the censorship of typepad)

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 27 2007 2:40 utc | 31

(continued from above, in an effort to evade the censorship of typepad)
I feel sure that it takes as much, if not more, courage to refuse to take part in the occupation of Palestine as it does to refuse to take part in the occupation of Iraq.
There are Americans working along the same lines :
Iraq Veterans Against the War
Fight to Survive
The Military Project
I hope you will pass those URLs along to your men.
I appreciate the words of encouragement to remain morally straight and ensure my Soldiers remained focused on right and wrong. I already know that, believe that, and live by it, but it is always encouraging to hear that there are still others who will openly speak about the virtue of doing the right thing, even when no one is watching.
I find your words encouraging. I hope that you continue to remain straight and to encourage your Soldiers to do so, especially when no one is watching.
I hope you and they return safe and sound to the USA, with your heads held high, knowing that neither you nor they have killed or tortured anyone.
Your nation has dealt you a terrible hand. It sounds as though you are playing it skillfully amidst the worst possible circumstances.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 27 2007 2:41 utc | 32

Film coming out soon about how the US government and the US military got it very wrong: Taxi to the Dark Side

Posted by: Susan | Apr 27 2007 5:00 utc | 33

I am 1LT Christopher Nogle’s proud mother. He is an honest, intelligent, moral, honorable, Christian young man. He bravely serves his country and defends the rights of his fellow Americans, even those who attack him. He does not need to read your ignorant, hateful, vile e-mails. He and his Soldiers put their lives on the line everyday – how many of you are willing to do so?
As for that 13-year-old Iraqi boy…in a Muslim culture, the eldest male present is to be treated as the head of the household. Since when is questioning someone considered “barbaric” (Susan Oehler) and immoral? Neither the mother nor the 13-year-old was harmed.
As the Washington Post article stated:
Al-Qaeda in Iraq, operating under the banner of an umbrella group called the Islamic State of Iraq, has managed to drive out Shiites from many cities and villages in Diyala. Shiites in Baqubah, who once made up about 45 percent of the population, now account for about 20 percent, said Sutherland.
In March, gunmen laid siege to the Shiite village of Towakel, northeast of Muqdadiyah, burning dozens of homes, slaughtering livestock and leaving a smoldering ghost town in their wake.
On wall after wall they scrawled graffiti proclaiming the village the domain of the Islamic State of Iraq.
“They just stormed in one night and started on the southwest side and started burning their way all the way up this one road,” said Von Plinsky. The Shiite villagers “had defenses built up . . . but they just got overpowered. They got decimated.”
In November, al-Qaeda fighters overwhelmed and destroyed an Iraqi police station just south of Baqubah. The next month, the Iraqi army pulled out of the area.
And if you read the article, you know that regarding the incident involving my son, the reporter stated:
On another recent night raid near Muqdadiyah — based on a tip from the Iraqi police — U.S. soldiers rolled out in six Humvees expecting to find a half-dozen al-Qaeda in Iraq members in a meeting.
Diyala had been a peaceful province whose residents co-existed with our troops. But as Al-Qaeda and the insurgents fled our troop build-up in Baghdad, they moved into Diyala. Many of the local residents have left. Our troops there try very hard to find the terrorists before they plant their IEDs and car bombs to prevent further attacks on innocent residents.
As for my family, we are Christians. We are also a military family. As John Fancis Lee posted, I presently have two sons serving this great nation in the U.S. Army and my husband retired last year after serving 26 1/2 years. We traveled all over the world and lived in many places, including the Persian Gulf, from 1997-2000.
While we lived in the Gulf, my sons attended a school whose student body was comprised of children from 52 different countries; a multitude of races and religions. Their friends and ours were of all races, religions, and nationalities.
Our next door neighbors were a Catholic Iraqi woman married to a Kuwaiti Muslim. Sahare told me many stories of atrocities Iraqis had suffered under Saddam Hussein, not just the ones that have been reported. They were living in Kuwait when the Iraqi army invaded in 1990 and again witnessed first-hand the brutality of Saddam’s regime. Whenever I visited with her, she told me that she prayed daily that President Clinton would send U.S. troops into Iraq to topple Saddam and save her family.
We also lived under restrictions and curfews each time Saddam rattled his sabers and launched missiles at his neighbors. So, my views and opinions are based on my own life experiences as well as research.
How many of you are basing your opinions on your life experiences rather than just political leanings? We’ve walked the walked. You just talk the talk. We’ve lived in a Muslim culture. We have Muslim friends. This is not a war against a religion. It is not about oil. It is about trying to stop terrorists from killing thousands and thousands of innocents…Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, etc…men, women, and children of all races and nationalities. That is our military’s mission, the War on Terror.
John Francis Lee…your words to my son are SEDITIOUS. And our troops are not torturing or mistreating the Iraqi populace. Our troops aren’t destroying their country. On the contrary, our troops have provided them with clean water, electricity, schools, medicine, etc…that they hadn’t had in generations. The only ones who have any reason to feel threatened are those who are participating in terrorist activities (car bombings, planting IEDs, etc…). They kill innocent Iraqis as well as our troops.
Dr. Susan Oehler, PhD., a pediatric audiologist, an educated woman, yet she resorts to name calling rather than having an intelligent discussion. Susan Oehler calls my son a barbarian and both of us idiots. Idiots? My neighbor’s 3-year-old son calls his playmates idiots. Really, Dr. Oehler, couldn’t you come up with something a little more imaginative? More proof that an advanced education does not necessarily indicate intelligence.
And, Susan, for the record, Iraq has been unstable and violent for many, many years. I guess you just weren’t paying attention. Also, read the article again. My son and his Soldiers were not the ones “brandishing knives.” It was a local Iraqi policeman.
Again, as I told you in my e-mail, Christopher forwarded that trash you sent him to his family. He did not post it on a blog, forward it to media, or post it on a website. I’m sure if you had received a hateful, disgusting e-mail from a stranger, you would have shared it with your loved ones. And, once again, in your response to my son’s post, you have to resort to insults. Very mature, Dr. Oehler. Your heart is filled with hatred – for the Administration, for your fellow Americans with different views, for our brave Soldiers.
Susan Oehler uses our troops on her website, as if she is concerned about our fallen and wounded heroes, but then writes that vile e-mail she sent to my son. Clearly, she doesn’t give a damn about our American Soldiers’ sacrifices. She wants to use the image of thousands of dead Soldiers to make her political points. That is disturbed! Obviously, your agenda is fueled by a hatred of President Bush and this administration, not the well-being of our troops, concern for the Iraqi people, or by morality. As I mourn the loss of nine more brave American Soldiers and pray for the recovery of the 20 who were injured in the car bombing Tuesday in Diyala province, you must be delighted to add 9 more dog tags and 20 more small stars to your display.
And, by the way, Susan, I don’t know what kind of Christian you say you are but I am a Lutheran and we believe in reaching out to others, saving souls,. How can you claim to be a Christian while telling my son, “I do hope that you have never darken the doorways of a Christian church…?”
One last thing, Susan…please explain your comment to Christopher: “Your little brother is the smartest one in the family, by the way.”
To all ~
Whether you support or oppose the political reasons that are tied to this war, ALL Americans should support our troops – and in my opinion, have a moral obligation to do so. If you search your soul and still cannot find it within yourself to support them and pray for them, at least have the decency to leave them alone.

Posted by: Darlene Nogle | Apr 27 2007 6:09 utc | 34

respectfully ma’am, no one is happy that anyone is dying at all. At least I’m not and I haven’t read anything other than this post so I can’t speak for anyone else.
your concern seems to be focused on a moral obligation.
is it moral to lie?
for the government (and those of allies), specifically the current admin, most certainly lied through their teeth and now the sons of many mothers are in harms way in Iraq rather than looking for Osama Bin Forgotten or being at the ready when Afghanistan, Iran or Syria lands their troops in Florida or Ungava Bay. Or just hanging with their kids or their Mom…
Being critical of government lies is no slight of the poor buggers in the trenches in the least, especially if it brings them home to the bosom of their family

Posted by: jcairo | Apr 27 2007 7:31 utc | 35

To Chris Nogle:
I am Bernhard, the author of the above piece and I did put your email address into it.
I found the address by simply googling your full name. It was public.
Thanks for responding here.

Posted by: b | Apr 27 2007 7:34 utc | 36

@Mrs. Nogle
Our troops aren’t destroying their country. On the contrary, our troops have provided them with clean water, electricity, schools, medicine, etc…that they hadn’t had in generations.
These are outrages lies. All available statistics show that the situation in Iraq for decades was much better in all the respects you name before the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq. As a starter you might want to check the Iraq Index published monthly by the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings. The most recent on is here (pdf).
This is not a war against a religion. It is not about oil. It is about trying to stop terrorists from killing thousands and thousands of innocents…Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, etc…men, women, and children of all races and nationalities. That is our military’s mission, the War on Terror.
So nice you come with a new reason for attacking Iraq. No WMD’s so we have to invent something new?
There were no active terrorists in Iraq before the U.S. invaded and occupied it. When the U.S. leaves the Iraqis will take care that the terrorists are “shut down”.
Inbetween, you son might get killed. That’s sad, but it is his choice and you seem to support that.

Posted by: b | Apr 27 2007 7:55 utc | 37

@Chris Nogle
The questions asked to the 13 year old male were not threats. I was not threatening or implying that the family would not see the man again for failing to cooperate with us.
The boy certainly felt threatened and you tried to exploit that fear. If you didn’t imply a threat and the family felt threatend you have done a bad job communicating with them.
Let me recommend to you Col. Pat Lang’s paper on How to Work With Tribesmen (pdf). It may help you to understand what you are doing.

Posted by: b | Apr 27 2007 8:05 utc | 38

Dear Darlene Nogle,
Please do not think that I feel that I have the “moral highground” in this discussion. I am just another bozo on the bus. But all of us must look and investigate the world and come to our own conclusions. And I must disagree with some of yours.
Al-Qaeda in Iraq, operating under the banner of an umbrella group called the Islamic State of Iraq, has managed to drive out Shiites from many cities and villages in Diyala. Shiites in Baqubah, who once made up about 45 percent of the population, now account for about 20 percent, said Sutherland.
Many of these Sunni extremist groups are funded directly or indirectly by the Saudis, our “allies”. Elliot Abrams, of Iran-Contra infamy, is actively funding and promoting the civil war in Palestine, and now in Lebanon as well, apparently. It may well be the case that the Neocons in Washington are indirectly funding the very Sunni extremist groups that are trying to murder not only the Shiites, but also your son and the other Americans in Iraq.
Our enemies are not in Iraq, they are in the Neocon regime in Washington DC.
While we lived in the Gulf, my sons attended a school whose student body was comprised of children from 52 different countries; a multitude of races and religions. Their friends and ours were of all races, religions, and nationalities.
There are many “international enclaves” around the world. There are many here in Thailand. The Thais who attend these schools are no more representative of the general Thai population than the Americans who attend them are representative of the population of America. Don’t be fooled into thinking that the people you have met in such enclaves are the ordinary residents of the Middle East.
John Francis Lee…your words to my son are SEDITIOUS. And our troops are not torturing or mistreating the Iraqi populace. Our troops aren’t destroying their country. On the contrary, our troops have provided them with clean water, electricity, schools, medicine, etc…that they hadn’t had in generations. The only ones who have any reason to feel threatened are those who are participating in terrorist activities (car bombings, planting IEDs, etc…). They kill innocent Iraqis as well as our troops.
I certainly want to separate myself from the present American regime, and to separate the present American regime from my government.
My government is not a collection of people, my government is a collection of laws : the Constitution and its Amendments. If anyone is subverting the Constitution of the United States of America it is the present Neocon regime in Washington DC. And they are in fact subverting it.
Iraq is in ruins. It was not in ruins before its shocking, awful invasion by the United States of America. Between 500,000 and 1,000,000 million blameless Iraqis have died as the direct result of this regime’s on-going War Crime in Iraq.
The Neocon regime in the United States of America has written a law that will turn over control of Iraq’s oil resources to the Anglo-American oil companies and is now demanding that it’s puppet government in Iraq pass this law.
The people of Iraq are in general insurrection against the occupation of their country and the expropriation of their resources as well they should be.
Whether you support or oppose the political reasons that are tied to this war, ALL Americans should support our troops – and in my opinion, have a moral obligation to do so. If you search your soul and still cannot find it within yourself to support them and pray for them, at least have the decency to leave them alone.
I support our troops because they are my fellow human beings caught up in a disastrous predicament, and I hope that they can maintain their humanity under such inhuman stress. I am thankful that I do not find myself in their shoes.
I wrote to your son because his name was published in the Washington Post; because a google search produced his email address.
During the Vietnam war, when I was younger, I occasionally confused the American armed forces fighting in Vietnam with the forces that bore responsibility for bringing that war about. I am older now and know that that was and is wrong-headed. We individuals are all just poor humans. To be sure we make choices in life, some better than others. I have certainly made my full share of poor choices. We must all live with the results of our choices, willy-nilly.
But I must speak up against the United States’ War Crimes unfolding before me. I foolishly had thought that just as I had grown and learned from the Vietnam war that so too had my country. That at least that disastrous, wrong road would not be taken again.
Well it has been taken again. I watched in shocked disbelief as the present, criminal, Neocon regime terrified my compatriots, told monstrous lies, and began this war of aggression in the Middle East.
This time we must have a War Crimes Tribunal and try George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Colin Powell, Condelleezza Rice… and all the others directly responsible for the criminal aggression in Iraq.
For if we do not all sit down to the televised spectacle of the Anglo-American War Crimes Tribunal as it unfolds night after night, if we do not own up to the monstrous War Crimes we have committed as a nation, then when our national economy recovers from the devastation that this crime has caused to ourselves we will set right off again on the same criminal path.
If we do not finally remove our national blinders, stop telling ourselves stories about “spreading democracy”, if we do not actually exercise democracy and accept responsiblity for our acts as a nation, then all the Americans killed, maimed and wounded in this war will have been killed, maimed and wounded in vain.
We are just two individuals. There is no reason for us to continue to go at each other if we both hold such divergent opinions, while each insisting on the correctness of their point of view. The evidence of my senses convinces me daily that my views of the current American regime and of its aggressive war in Iraq are correct.
But let us continue, as your son says he will continue, on the straight path, telling the truth as we see it, dealing as well as we can with the situations we find ourselves in with compassion and humanity, allowing the results of our actions to reach us, to teach us, to inform our choices in the future.
Time will tell which of our viewpoints is more nearly descriptive of the situation at hand. It will be the next generation, the mass of humanity, not yourself or myself, that passes judgement on the acts of the Neocon regime in America at the turn of the Twenty-first Century.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 27 2007 8:29 utc | 39

Darlene Nogle,
I thought I would write an e-mail to your son also, but thought better of it for reasons of privacy and because your son, being in the “thick of it” would likely brush it off anyway. But, since you have graced our board here with a response, I’ll say just a couple of things.
First off, I myself am an infantry vet from the Vietnam war. I’ve seen with my own eyes many, many of the same mistakes being repeated both by American political and military leadership now in Iraq. The fog of war begins in Washington DC but eventually permeates the vision of troops on the battlefield, usually with profoundly counterproductive self defeating behavior. Iraqi polls well indicate a long and steady decline in support, if not a pervasive revulsion to the current presence of American troops on their soil. This decline began after the initial invasion and has grown steadily since then, largely due to the shifting political reasoning and contradictions in Washington (and implemented by the CPA), but just as importantly by, the tactical decisions and behavior of the troops themselves. The WaPo article quoting your son is a minor case of the latter. What do you think that 13 year old boy (or his mom) are now going to think of Americans? That they have decided without proof that their father is a “bad guy”, that they expect them to rat out their own father to the occupier and to probably never see him again. That the Iraqi troops (yes the ones with the knives) are seen as (Shiites) local enforcers acting with and supporting your sons actions. Dollars to donuts Darlene, that boy, will have come to remember that event as a moment of terror perpetuated upon himself and his mother by Americans. And the reason that he may look upon his father with renewed interest and inspiration, even. That boy now has tangible proof to hate everything you seem to think we are in Iraq for. This of course has happened thousands of times in a thousand different ways — how else can you explain why the “dead enders” never seem to end and never seem to die, but instead grow and flourish. And that is the overwhelming significance of this little drop in the bucket incident your son participated in — and then brushed off — is.
Its not that I expect any of this critique to make any difference to you or your son, its pretty clear that above all you’re a believer, and anything I say, you will say is against you personally and against the nation. Our president has made sure you follow this dictate and to never question his judgment. So my appeal is simply that what we do in Iraq, as in Vietnam, is killing ourselves slowly, and your son just happens to carry the gun at this time. And him and you and your family will live with the results much more profoundly than myself. As you know the fallout from Vietnam continues to this day, so, good luck!

Posted by: anna missed | Apr 27 2007 8:49 utc | 40

AGAIN people, if you read the article, you know that regarding the incident involving my son, the reporter stated:
On another recent night raid near Muqdadiyah — based on a tip from the Iraqi police — U.S. soldiers rolled out in six Humvees expecting to find a half-dozen al-Qaeda in Iraq members in a meeting.
That is the reason my son and his Soldiers were at the particular house that night. What is the 13-year-old boy to think? Perhaps that his father is involved in terrorist activities at 0300.

Posted by: Darlene Nogle | Apr 27 2007 9:05 utc | 41

AGAIN people, if you read the article, you know that regarding the incident involving my son, the reporter stated:
On another recent night raid near Muqdadiyah — based on a tip from the Iraqi police — U.S. soldiers rolled out in six Humvees expecting to find a half-dozen al-Qaeda in Iraq members in a meeting.
That is the reason my son and his Soldiers were at the particular house that night. What is the 13-year-old boy to think? Perhaps that his father is involved in terrorist activities at 0300.
I have no interest in arguing policy or politics with any of you. It’s like two people witnessing a car accident from two different street corners. You will see it your way and I will see it mine.
My only reasons for posting on this site is the vile e-mails sent to my son and the distortions of what actually happened in that house in Diyala.
Again, my concern is for our troops. And I ask all Americans to support them.

Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 27 2007 9:24 utc | 42

Darlene, the sooner you stop imposing your own culture and values upon 13 year olds in Iraq, the sooner you might understand that the likelyhood of your culture and values being shared by that 13 year old, in his 13 year old mind, are exactly zero. But then thats why this whole escapade has turned out like it has. Isn’t it?

Posted by: anna missed | Apr 27 2007 9:32 utc | 43

It’s like two people witnessing a car accident from two different street corners
well, I think we all can agree that it is indeed a car wreck. I am grateful Ms Nogle was able to keep her comments civil. I can also imagine how hard it would be for her to see any other point of view, it would mean accepting her own part in this viciousness we have taken to the Iraqi people. Killing nearly a million people and destroying a country’s infrastructure is not the way to fight terrorism….that is terrorism.

Posted by: dan of steele | Apr 27 2007 9:42 utc | 44

No offense, folks, but there is something inherently true about what the Nogles have to say: they are, at most, a small cog in a machine vastly greater than themselves, who are stuck in a difficult situation trying to make the best of it. Hassling them does no good for anyone, I’d wager.
Yes, you might think that Lt. Nogle can do the “right thing” by refusing to obey “illegal” orders, etc., but that’s an extraordinary demand to make of soldiers in a combat zone, especially when they are young men, as Lt. Nogle certainly is, with his full of the stuff about following orders and all that, and with all his comrades watching his actions–likely to think that he’s a coward betraying them should he try to do anything else. Yes, I know what Nuremberg had to say about “illegal orders,” but I also think it’s a particularly brutal and cowardly notion to hold young men without much life experience responsible for not taking extraordinarily heroic and immensely risky decisions.

Posted by: kao-hsien-chih | Apr 27 2007 9:50 utc | 45

@Mrs Nogle:
al-Qaeda is the Arabic word for “the database.”
That specific base was a list of Arabic fighters who were given U.S. weapons and Saudi money to kick the Sowjets out of Afghanistan. When that was done some freelanced to fight to kick the U.S. out of their Arab homelands. Those freelancers won when the U.S. pulled its troops out of Saudi Arabia after 9/11. Their organisation is now mostly destroyed.
Today anybody can name himself “al-Qaeda”. Everybody fighting as guerilla somewhere can be named and called and demonized as “al-Qaeda”.
If an Iraqi policeman (most likely a Shia) tips off the U.S. on some meeting of some people (Sunni?) he doesn’t like, he will call them “al-Qaeda”. They could be rivaling tribesmen, they could have land, daughters, houses or money the policeman would like to have for himself. The U.S. people, neither the Army nor the reporter will know. You will not know either. But they and you jump when someone says “al-Qaeda”. They and you do exactly what that policeman wants you to do – do away with his rivals.
I hear him laughing on his way home.
But if you want to believe the chicken feed is delicious, you are free to do so.

Posted by: b | Apr 27 2007 9:57 utc | 46

Thanks b for your comment @ 46
What sane individual would believe any “so called” intelligence in the face of the “so called” intelligence that got us into this mess. Lt Nogle is just another one our “true believers.” How else do you justify rolling up to a house at three in the morning to terrorize people, certainly wouldn’t be there at three in the afternoon, since the invasion, all Iraqis are fully employed, thanks to our new messiah, cheerleader-in-chief. Here’s a man that knows how to “talk the talk, and walk the walk”, that Mrs Nogle like to quote.
Thanks also to JFL and anna missed for your reasoned responses to the “true believers”.

Posted by: cut and run, terrorist lieberal craigb | Apr 27 2007 11:48 utc | 47

An IED – must be al-Qaeda!!!
Bomb Found at Texas Women’s Clinic

The device “was configured in such a way to cause serious bodily injury or death,” said David Carter, assistant chief of the Austin Police Department.
Tests later confirmed that the package was explosive. The regional Joint Terrorism Task Force, led by the FBI and including Austin police, is investigating.

Time to clear and hold Austin. Call the Army, bomb these terrorists.

Posted by: b | Apr 27 2007 14:05 utc | 48

While reading the posts to get caught up, I can’t help but laugh. It has been acknowledged many times that there are definitely two opposing opinions on this matter. I may be a “believer” as called by some. I believe that I have been placed in my current position (platoon leader) because I have the potential to lead my Soldiers and be trusted to do the right thing. Believing that is what keeps me going everyday. I, nor anybody posting or reading these comments are perfect. This is a microcosm of the debates on Capitol Hill, across the country, and around the world. The only true power we have is to vote, and to have the freedom of speech to share our thoughts with others. At some point, though, everybody must take a step back and realize that you will not make any difference arguing till the cows come home with someone who saw the car wreck from the opposite street corner.
I read everybody’s posts without bias. I understand where most are coming from. Serving in the Army does not automatically slant me to one political side or another. I hope everybody who reads this remembers that when they begin to assume they know exactly what a Soldier is going to say before he even opens his mouth.
Regarding the highly-likely possibility of local nationals or ISF attempting to use US forces to fight their sectarian battles for them by detaining their personal sworn enemies, that is always a consideration when we are acting on information. We do not blindly attack anything that is pointed out as “terrorist activity” or “Al-Qaeda”.
And finally, in regards to the two “large buck knives” that were allegedly brandished in front of the boy’s face – Josh Partlow (Washington Post) was beside me from before we left the FOB to the time we returned. He rode in my truck and went where I went. He was in the room when I asked the boy to step into the next room with me, my interpreter, Josh, and one other Soldier. (Just to help with the imagination, the other Soldier was not standing anywhere near the boy, he was watching the door and windows for security. Also, the boy and my interpreter were sitting next to each other, and I was sitting facing the boy approximately two feet away, so as to not crowd him or intimidate him. Josh was standing to my left, facing the three of us.) After we spoke in the other room, we exited the room to go back to the room where his mother was. As we moved from room to room, the IP in question bent down and picked up two bayonets that had been found during the search of the house. As we walked by, he motioned toward me with the bayonets, asking if I wanted him to seize them. The boy was in front of me, walking toward the room and the IP was to my front left, but not close to the boy. Josh was behind me. I cannot tell you what Josh saw, but what I saw was the IP motioning toward me, not near the boy. Any such action would not be allowed and the IP would be detained if that were to have occured.
I have not posted these messages on here in an attempt to force all readers to agree with me. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinions. I just saw this as the only opportunity for me to tell my side, since you were all able to read the Washington Post’s version of the story. As I stated before, I do not have the time or resources to wage any political battle or even follow the latest events in Washington right now. I only encourage everyone to maintain their integrity and always consider both sides of the story before rushing to judgement. Thank You.

Posted by: Chris Nogle | Apr 27 2007 18:46 utc | 49

@Chris – I have not posted these messages on here in an attempt to force all readers to agree with me. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinions. I just saw this as the only opportunity for me to tell my side, since you were all able to read the Washington Post’s version of the story. As I stated before, I do not have the time or resources to wage any political battle or even follow the latest events in Washington right now. I only encourage everyone to maintain their integrity and always consider both sides of the story before rushing to judgement. Thank You.
Thank you Chris for your response and for being open for discussion. That is NOT taken for granted these days and I certainly value it.
Just for your information, I’ve been an officer myself though that’s some years ago. I have thought about war longe and hard. I believe to understand your perspective.
But your or my perspective is not relevant.
Relevant is the perspective of that 13 year old boy. He didn’t see bayonets motioned to you, he did see them motioned to him.
And that is all that matters. With that, his tribal culture background and the words you used on him, he is your enemy now. Add the mother, her brothers, cousins etc. You are creating enemies just by being there.
What are you going to do about that?
A M16 (or G3 or 36 in my case) GBU whatever may “solve” the immediate problem.
But you are in the wrong country for the wrong cause. If you don’t find out yourself that this is the case – and leave, that boy will teach you. You can prevent him from doing so, but what does that make of you?

Posted by: b | Apr 27 2007 19:26 utc | 50

Al-Qaeda in Iraq, operating under the banner of an umbrella group called the Islamic State of Iraq
i would like to point out that our country has a history of toppling regimes using clandestine operations, training and facilitating soldiers of host nations to carry out unspeakable deeds in the name of the US. this has been recorded at congressional hearings repeatedly and is not in question. the policies carried out in other countries were transported
to iraq as documented in this newsweek article. anyone following the ME is aware of the death squads operating out of the iraqi ministry of the interior as part of the US policy.
a glimps into the history of vietnam history shows us the US funded communists to blow up false flag operation, killing civilians.
August 1963, and on August 21 Ngo Dinh Nhu used the martial law authority to carry out major raids on the largest pagodas of the Buddhist group behind the protests. Nhu conducted the raids in such a way as to suggest that South Vietnamese military commanders were behind them, and used troops funded by the United States through the CIA to carry out the raids.
ARVN and President Diem began to be criticized by the foreign press when the troops were used to crush armed anti-government religious groups like the Cao Dai and Hoa Hao as well as to raid Buddhist temples, which according to Diem, were harboring Communist guerrillas.

much of this information can be accessed from our NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVES and are hardly a fantasy of the left.
i do not hold soldiers responsible for the actions of the government they represent for how can they know what is truly in the minds of masters/designers of war. we have ushered into power in iraq some extremely unsavory characters, specifically hakim who is behind the death squads and certainly no less of a morally corrupt person than saddam.
the current leaders of our country have repeatedly lied to the american public. as a christian, how can you trust the integrity of those who lie us into war? a war that fills the coffers of their families? i urge you to watch this video called WHY WE FIGHT.
listen to the words of dwight d eisenhower.
A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction…
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defence with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.

please reconsider what it is we are fighting for and what it is iraqis are unwilling to unite over. you will never have a cohesive government that is willing to let an invader plunder its natural resources. the oil draft law we have been continually pushing the iraqis to pass , and is a requirement of the benchmarks set by congress allows for their national wealth to be taken out of the country operated and controlled by multinational corporations.
the islamic state of iraq is made up of people who were unfamiliar to iraqis prior to their appearance on the scene. where did they come from? why are they killing other sunnis which make up the bulk of the resistance to the occupation? is it a coincidence the terrorists of this islamic state happen to share an enemy w/the US. all of these things are questions that does not make for simple answers that lead to defined goals. they lead to endless war, they breed terrorism, not detract.
our army is to defend and protect america, our soldiers lives are being squandered and wasted for this war. the vacum created by the invasion has reign terror down upon iraq creating more terrorists and it is getting worse not better. the will of the american public should be respected. a majority of us don’t want this war. we can support our troops by bringing them home so they can serve our country by serving the will of the people, not the will of the complex.
thank you very much both Chris and Darlene Nogle for visiting our site and responding to criticism. i respect both of you. sorry for the letter i wrote expressing my anger. thank you for your service to my country that i love so much. you cannot know how much it breaks my heart that i believe we have criminals making decisions that put the lives of our soldiers and the citizens of iraq in danger however indirectly or with whatever good intentions squandered. know that as i work to bring home the soldiers it is because i truly believe it is what is best for my country and the world and w/ a love for humanity.

Posted by: annie robbins | Apr 27 2007 20:59 utc | 51

“Neither the mother nor the 13-year-old was harmed.”
So, if some foreign troops busted into your house at 3 AM and said those things to you (while some were searching the place) and someone waved knives in your 13 year old son’s face – you would claim that neither you nor your child was harmed?
Also, I do not have a Ph.D. (where do you get this stuff from?)
And, Iraq was stable before the US invaded – stable under a dictator who was brutal, but did his worst crimes while being supported by the US authorities in the 1980’s.
“Susan Oehler uses our troops on her website, as if she is concerned about our fallen and wounded heroes, but then writes that vile e-mail she sent to my son.”
Another falsehood here – I am a member of the WNC Peace Coalition, but I had nothing to do with putting up a display that has our troops in Iraq (who died) on it. I don’t know the lady who did it, or exactly where her shop is – other than it is 35 miles from my home. I don’t know who put it on the website either. I think it is way stupid to put up deceased troops names, if the goal is to stop war. The Vietnam War Memorial should be plenty evidence that it won’t work. I think we should put up pictures of dead bloody babies. I try to do that on my blog FACES OF GRIEF
And, I said your younger son is the smartest of the family because I have not seen any evidence that he jumps to conclusions, which means he is capable of logical thought.
If you would like to see the after results of a home search (they thought there were al Qaeda terrorists there) in Baghdad, Click this link.
AND LISTEN CAREFULLY TO WHAT HE SAYS>>>>>>>

Posted by: Susan | Apr 28 2007 0:26 utc | 52

War is the greatest plague that can afflict humanity, it destroys religion, it destroys states, it destroys families. Any scourge is preferable to it. – Martin Luther

Posted by: jcairo | Apr 28 2007 1:37 utc | 53

Susan ~ WHAT? You’re not a PhD? You mean information I read in an article about you was INACCURATE? NO! I wonder how that could’ve happened? Guess you know how my son feels. At least no one called you a barbarian or an idiot over it. Talk about jumping to conclusions!
Try reading post #49. Christopher provides his first-hand, eye witness account of the encounter with the mother and 13-year-old. I’m sure you’ll call it a lie but, I wonder…you (and the other bloggers here) don’t know Joshua Partlow any better than you know 1LT Christopher Nogle but you assume that Nogle is lying while BELIEVING – and even embracing as gospel – Partlow’s article. And why that is? Oh, yeah…because you read it in The Washington Post! And you are “bleievers.”
Partlow’s job is to write articles for the Post for their liberal readers so, of course, his spin is going to put the worst possible light on the situation in Iraq to fan the flames of the anti-war movement and #1…to get a Democrat into the White House.
Look – All media slant political issues one way or the other, which is why I try to get my info from various sources and then, I still take it with a grain of salt. But you all are leaning so far to the left, you can’t accept that there might be a truth more to the center.
And, yes, Susan, my 17-year-old is a very bright, well-thought, polite, honest, and respectful young man, as are all 4 of my sons. I tried to have a civilized, mature discussion, not about politics, but about this incident with Christopher. Instead, we have been attacked, insulted, and called names by hostile, close-minded bloggers.
So, write your letters to Congress, hold your rallies, campaign, etc…but don’t attack our troops for bravely and honorably doing their duty. I want them home, too. But attacking them with hateful e-mail, urging them to disregard their orders (John Francis Lee), and insulting their intelligence will not further your efforts to end this war. Focus your frustration, anger, and energy on the politicians.
Well, folks…it’s been interesting but I have a real life so I won’t waste anymore time here.
GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS! GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS! GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS! And GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Posted by: Darlene Nogle | Apr 28 2007 6:47 utc | 54

Susan Oehler: Education Programs Manager
Susan Oehler holds a Ph.D. in Ethnomusicology and a Masters Degree in Education. She began her career in education as a public school teacher. Since 1990, she has taught both youth and adults about blues, rock and roll, sacred and secular African American music, world music, American and world history, and economics.

perhaps this is the doctorate referred to. Mrs. Nogle can use ‘the google’ too.

Posted by: jcairo | Apr 28 2007 10:52 utc | 55

GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS! GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS! GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS! And GOD BLESS AMERICA! and Israel?

. . . It often surprises many Americans, who hear in the media that Israel is such a great ally of the United States, to learn that there are good patriotic Americans in the FBI who don’t like the idea of American public officials, like the aforementioned neo-conservatives, passing classified defense material to this dubious ally. . .

As one of the top Democratic recipients of pro-Israel funds for the 2006 election cycle, pocketing over $83,000, Clinton now has Iran in her cross hairs. God Bless em alright…
AIPAC is pushing for the USA to attack Iran for Israel…
Is your Christopher prepared to die for Israel Darlene?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 28 2007 12:16 utc | 56

soldiers like the one being dicussed here is not a victim – he is a perpetrator
their like has been written about by sy hersh, by christopher browning on the nazi police battallions & by daniel goldhagen in his book ‘ hitlers willing executioners’

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 28 2007 12:54 utc | 57

Boy I hope I never find myself in your court r’giap. You sound like a righteous hangin’ judge to me. I guess the real left takes no prisoners, eh? Maybe you are a Stalinist fruitcake.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 28 2007 13:07 utc | 58

jfl
stalinist fruitcake i might be
but it seems to me & i believe i have enough experience of it – it that modern soldiery – has been so systematiclly brutalised or seduced by their culture – to commit any number of crimes that are consistent with that culture
they are victims but they know exactly (often in great detail)what they do
quite the same as the russian soldiers in chechnya
fighting men or women – like the man who interupted & stopped the massacre of innocent at my lai was an exception – i just wish there were many more of them
jfl – i have witnessed what ‘innocent’ soldiers did to the villages of the vietnamese – the point is that they murdered 3 million of them – these are niether just or honorable wars – but wars of terror – wars of anhilation – which the armies of nazi power give us the only concrete precedent
& while i am at it – the us ‘justice’ system – is neither concerned with the innoncence or guilt of either perpetrator or victim
haditha tho will come back to haunt it

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 28 2007 13:26 utc | 59

Susan ~ WHAT? You’re not a PhD? You mean information I read in an article about you was INACCURATE? NO! I wonder how that could’ve happened? Guess you know how my son feels. At least no one called you a barbarian or an idiot over it. Talk about jumping to conclusions!- D. Nogle
If you read it in an article, provide a LINK TO THE ARTICLE, so I can correct this. I frankly do not believe you read it in an article somewhere. Prove me wrong.

Posted by: Susan | Apr 28 2007 14:26 utc | 60

perhaps this is the doctorate referred to. Mrs. Nogle can use ‘the google’ too.
Posted by: jcairo
That article is not me. And there is no mention of being a “Pediatric Audiologist” in that article either. Kinda hard to have two major careers going at the same time.

Posted by: Susan | Apr 28 2007 14:29 utc | 61

Here’s a clip from a young man in Baghdad. He filmed it after US troops ‘searched’ the home.
Link to video of Baghdad home after US “search”
No Washington Post journalists had anything to do with it.

Posted by: Susan | Apr 28 2007 14:36 utc | 62

no question that savage crimes are committed in Iraq everyday r’giap.
you have no reason to say of Christopher Nogle “he is a perpetrator”.
why do you even want to involve yourself with the judging of this human being?
and how are you doing it, by whija board? crystal ball?
come on r’giap. i’m as furious and heartbroken as you are. i mean i’m furious and heartbroken. i have no real knowledge of our relative fury and heartbrokenness.
but please don’t sink to this level. you have nothing but circumstantial evidence “against” Christopher Nogle, yet you are ready to make him the scapegoat for the American war crimes in Iraq.
if you’re going to start condemning people at least start at the top.
sorry about the fruitcake remark. i got mad at you.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 28 2007 14:46 utc | 63

susan, your 62 link isn’t working..

Posted by: annie | Apr 28 2007 15:38 utc | 64

i never said it was you, I said perhaps and used it as an illustration that this lady may have googled your name and used whatever came up first as the gospel about you
link in 62

Posted by: jcairo | Apr 28 2007 15:50 utc | 65

sorry about the fruitcake remark. i got mad at you.
Well, JFL, in my experience the last time you got mad at someone we lost contact with you for a good while…Hope that doesn’t repeat. In all seriousness, I appreciate your contributions. And if, R’giap is a fruitcake, then I’m a ding dong….lol And we hold court together.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 28 2007 15:59 utc | 66

“How about the area? Do you find this a safe place?”
Kind of says it all. Thanks for the link.

Posted by: beq | Apr 28 2007 16:09 utc | 67

Partlow’s job is to write articles for the Post for their liberal readers so, of course, his spin is going to put the worst possible light on the situation in Iraq to fan the flames of the anti-war movement and #1…to get a Democrat into the White House.
Look – All media slant political issues one way or the other

all main stream media in this country is owned and controlled by the same people who profit from war. the major corporations. just because the right keeps saying the news is slanted in our direction doesn’t make it so. i urge you Mrs. Nogle to watch this pbs special Buying the War about the news leading up to the war. there was a seemlessness coming out of DC between the WH and the press who completely failed in questioning the WH assertions which turned out to be.. lies. please watch the video.
we were lied to, and the press did not serve us as a nation.
the narrative in which we hear our news is formulated in think tanks, the same think tanks that design wars, owned by people who profit from those wars. we are not told the truth, we are told stories, the military is complicit in this. listen to the soldier testify before congress.
Soldier: Army ordered me not to tell truth
i completely agree we should all Focus your frustration, anger, and energy on the politicians.
in another time, under other circumstances there is much honor in carrying out one’s duty to one’s country in the service of the military. but when evil forces take over the halls of justice it is the duty of the citizen to speak out for those very same troops can be used to serve the evil goals of greed. this is the unspeakable crime in which our innocent children are going to war, not in defense of our country, but to serve as offense. it is our country and our duty to serve as a check on those powers which use our military in ways that are not in line w/our goals as a nation to be a beacon of light in the world.
our goals are the same and i wish you and your family peace.

Posted by: annie | Apr 28 2007 16:12 utc | 68

#62

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 28 2007 16:19 utc | 69

thanks uncle and jcairo

Posted by: annie | Apr 28 2007 16:36 utc | 70

Dear Mrs Noogle,
in comment 54 you say:

Try reading post #49. Christopher provides his first-hand, eye witness account of the encounter with the mother and 13-year-old. I’m sure you’ll call it a lie but, I wonder…you (and the other bloggers here) don’t know Joshua Partlow any better than you know 1LT Christopher Nogle but you assume that Nogle is lying while BELIEVING – and even embracing as gospel – Partlow’s article. And why that is? Oh, yeah…because you read it in The Washington Post!

First, you seem to assume that the Washington Post is a “liberal” paper. Reading Charles Krauthammer, Fred Hiatt and others in there opinion pages certainly allows for a very different judgement. In my country (old-european Germany) that paper would certainly be regarded as right wing establishment. Could the US have lost it’s scale?
What your son said in comment 49 does not nessessarily contradict what the WaPo reporter wrote. I’m quite sure neither is lying. The reporter may well have described something your son was not aware of. A platoon leader in such a situation certainly has a full plate of larger issues to care for while a reporter may see some detail and/or perspective that escapes the officer. Reading what your son told the kid involved, I’m inclined to believe that the reporter did had a more realistic take on the kids perception.
You also write

GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS! And GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Are you aware that the Iraqi mothers are saing exactly the same about their sons battling your son? Are you aware that they pray “God bless Iraq”?
America has invaded Iraq, not the other way around. Are there Iraqi soldiers searching your house at 3 in the night? Why should God bless an invader?
Are you, a U.S. citizen, in any quality better than the Iraqi mother married to a retired soldier and mother of five sons?
If so, why?
If not, please accept that that Iraqi mother’s call to God and her sons wish to kick out the invaders and occupiers, personalized by your son, will get more hearing than yours.
Iraq is God’s blessed country too.

Posted by: b | Apr 28 2007 19:50 utc | 71

Iraq is God’s blessed country too.
that needed to be said!! Thank you B.

Posted by: sabine | Apr 28 2007 21:25 utc | 72

jfl
the first stage of war is cowardice & stupidity & then one initiates a war of agression
the nazis in poland & the americans in iraq
the next step is pillage, murder quickly followed by lies of the most extreme kind
the soldiers, even the soldiers of the second world had a rough idea if wgat was going on where they were & where they were not. a soldier stationed in the port town of st nazaire was completely aware of what was happening in riga for example. whatever kind of ‘innocence’ people want to parade after a war – very few in the middle of it are dumb to its basic practices & fundamental reasons
an american solder in iraq today knows exactly what is happening – often in the greatest detail. the level of communication supercedes the ‘necessary’ lies of their leaders
in calling the soldiers of the empire (especially the mercenaries) perpetrators – i am simply following the guidelines that were established at nuremburg. & those guidelines are very very clear. so too the geneva conventions. i would suggest even in their own ‘rules of conduct’ – there is enough jurisprudential evidence to call these soldiers of an occupying army – perpetrators
& the groundbreaking work of people like sy hersh, of patrick cockburn & of the many iraqi correspondants who have provided us at great cost to themselves (very often, their lives) the exact details of how this war is being prosecuted. it has gone from the illegal to the deeply criminal
i am not prepared to listen to the ‘lost’ innocence of american boys & girls – when that innocence means the death of at least 1 million iraqi citizens – for me that is a very pornographic sense of innocence. there are exemplary people, as i said, like the officer who stopped lieutenant calley & his murderous thugs from completing their massacre – these to me are the real soldiers worthy of the tradition of the samurai
& yes there are men & women inside these machines who must possess a real concience – but they are speaking out at great risk to themselves, there are those investigators who have been following those who have been benefiting financially from this immoral war & these too are courageous & these too are done at great risk to themselves
to bully the children of innocents is an easy task & the methodology of such soldiers was made clear to us by the practices waffen ss who in practical terms are their brothers-in-arms

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 28 2007 21:45 utc | 73

a little evidence of immorality

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 28 2007 21:49 utc | 74

one, it’s not a “car accident”. it began as a conspiracy to commit war crimes. the conspirators ordered the crimes. others carried them out ‘just doing their job.’ even at scene of a car accident, most witnesses can accurately describe who was in the vehicle at the time.
two, the mother chides: “So, write your letters to Congress, hold your rallies, campaign, etc…but don’t attack our troops for bravely and honorably doing their duty.” disregarding the loaded use of the word “attack”, and operating from the fact pointed out above, there is nothing honorable about carrying out what began as a conspiracy to commit war crimes. these conspirators did not themselves carry out these acts. nor did they offer the services of their children.
three, a mother’s vengeance can be admirable sometimes. this ain’t one of them…

Posted by: b real | Apr 28 2007 21:57 utc | 75

i never said it was you, I said perhaps and used it as an illustration that this lady may have googled your name and used whatever came up first as the gospel about you — Posted by: jcairo in 65
Mrs. Nogle knew I was from NC and a pediatric audiologist. That reference is to someone with the same name who is a music professor in Indiana. So, she mixed the two of us up and then claimed that someone reported on it wrong that I had a Ph.D.
I am wondering if she is capable of logical thought.
Could the US have lost it’s scale? – b.
The answer is YES.

Posted by: Susan | Apr 28 2007 22:02 utc | 76

“To initiate a war of aggression . . . is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.” – Nuremberg Tribunal
oh, and violating the Nuremberg principles is also a violation of that “g.d. piece of paper” known as our Constitution.
Thanks for correcting my link above.

Posted by: Susan | Apr 28 2007 22:25 utc | 77

bravely and honorably doing their duty.
a soldiers duty is to protect us, the people.
Watada is the first soldier to resist the war based on the Nuremburg Principles pioneered by U.S. prosecutors during Nazi war crimes trials after World War II and adopted by the United Nations General Assembly (and the United States) in 1950.
Those principles hold soldiers, as well as heads of state, liable for “crimes against peace” (planning, preparing, initiating or waging a war of aggression or conspiring to do so), war crimes (violating “the laws or customs” of war) and crimes against humanity. A key phrase reads:
“The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relive him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.”
Soldiers do not give up their citizenship when they join the military, and their oath of allegiance to the U.S. Constitution binds them to a high standard of conduct. It is true for all of us, within and outside the military: it is time to stand up for the rule of law against a lawless commander in chief.

Posted by: annie | Apr 28 2007 22:40 utc | 78

i do however think it is important to acknowlegde the country was lied to. it is possible there are still people who believe those lies. cheney is still claiming iraq had wmd’s. the neocons are still pounding the drumbeat of accusations. although the information is there for anyone i do understand many of those soldiers are insulated from this information and not in a position to understand.
the thing to realize is that we have a threatening commander and chief who is a danger to the world and if some county were to invade us under the pretext of saving our country
IT WOULD BE THE SONS OF MRS NOGLE WHO WOULD BE DEFENDING OUR NATION AND WOULD BE CALLED INSURGENTS
unless of course they decided to align w/the invader and create a new government with that invader. what are the chances of that? zilch. i would hope that any decent american would defend our country from outsiders and form a resistance to any foriegn occupier.
let Mrs Nogel’s sons lead the resistance!

Posted by: annie | Apr 28 2007 22:49 utc | 79

Hugh Thompson stopped Calley and Capt. Medina from carrying out their orders (devised at the divisional level)to wipe-out the village (the HQ of the 48th Viet Cong Main Force battalion, so they werre told) on the ground while Col. Oran K. Henderson and Brig. General Samuel Koster and their staff calmly watched from circling choppers – these officers and gentlemen all did nothing to stop the slaughter. Thompson got a DFC for his action.
My Lai was not an aberration, there were many others like it. It was the way the US prosecuted the war.

Posted by: jcairo | Apr 28 2007 22:53 utc | 80

god bless this and god bless that, blah blah blah
2000 years of the prince of peace with nary any peace at all, but I guarantee that god was on our side for every side of every clash since then
the arrogance of the talking monkey knows no bounds when god is on their side

Posted by: jcairo | Apr 28 2007 23:01 utc | 81

The U.S. military is reporting nine American troops killed in Iraq, including five in fighting in Anbar province and three others in separate attacks south of the capital.
The deaths raise to nearly 100 the number of troops who have died in Iraq this month.

Posted by: annie | Apr 29 2007 0:22 utc | 82

I think we may be better off looking at something like the Milgram experiment in understanding perpetration by soldiers:
[3](Wiki)
Milgram summed things up in his 1974 article, “The Perils of Obedience”, writing:

The legal and philosophic aspects of obedience are of enormous importance, but they say very little about how most people behave in concrete situations. I set up a simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist. Stark authority was pitted against the subjects’ [participants’] strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects’ [participants’] ears ringing with the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not. The extreme willingness of adults to go to almost any lengths on the command of an authority constitutes the chief finding of the study and the fact most urgently demanding explanation.
Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority.[4]

The people in this experiment, for all intents and purpose, were TORTURING people. The were offered no cause, they were offered no mantel of honor or heroics for their participation. They were only given instruction by an anonymous “authority” figure. Now imagine if the same participants were selected at a formative age, punished for non-participation, given some legal authority (even if dubious), training in mission, and then reify the whole experience as a badge of national honor and national tradition — and then further grace it as a mission of religious fervor and sanctity (al-la Darlene). Then what percentage of the participants would walk away refusing to participate? Probably very, very few — if any.
This is why I (we should) put so little hope in expecting the moral imperative to succeed in informing and changing the actions of soldiers. Or laying blame on their parents for clutching onto their “beliefs” no matter how wrong headed or misinformed. This is not to say we should throw out morals, existential (individual) responsibility, or guilt. Because these are indeed the light by which ultimately define ourselves.
The real crime here refers back to the participants and their willingness to defer to authority. This willingness, is grounded in the innate social behavior of people, as a necessary component of social deference, the need to rely on others as a part in social reciprocation. The rise of “authority” figures in this context may or may not be an extension of natural social evolution, but one thing for sure, it is the source, the fundamental wellspring of evil in human interaction. That it has the ever present potential of exploiting the human bond between people for the purpose of intentionally oppressing them. The fact that we continually ignore or tacitly engage in this behavior of submitting to authority, and the structural role it plays in all our cultures is a problem unlikely to be solved by blaming the “perpetrators”.

Posted by: anna missed | Apr 29 2007 0:28 utc | 83

Basically, a society crosses into corruption when deference to authority eclipses the questioning of authority. When belief transcends reality.
I remember a marine interviewed before the invasion of Iraq, who said “once you agree to release the dogs of war, you have no right in hindsight, to complain about what the dogs have done”.

Posted by: anna missed | Apr 29 2007 1:05 utc | 84

a former co-worker related how he told his child of ‘the hierarchy of society’ and the child’s ‘place in it’. the former co-worker was surprised that I would question ‘the hierarchy’ when his eight year old found it so easy to grasp…

Posted by: jcairo | Apr 29 2007 2:11 utc | 85

the number of troops killed this month is at 111 – and the month is not over.
the number of Iraqis killed is hundreds per day. every day.
“Susan ~ WHAT? You’re not a PhD? You mean information I read in an article about you was INACCURATE? NO! I wonder how that could’ve happened? Guess you know how my son feels. At least no one called you a barbarian or an idiot over it. Talk about jumping to conclusions!”- D. Nogle
Turns out the information was not INACCURATE – you just read something and jumped to the conclusion it was me you were reading about – only it was someone who has the same name but lives in Indiana. I can’t imagine why you would call someone a barbarian or an idiot over a Ph.D. though.
And, NO, I don’t know how your son feels. And I don’t really care. He’s a grown up who can take care of himself.
I would like you and your son to understand something of what that 13 year old boy felt in the middle of the night when the US military showed up.

Posted by: Susan | Apr 29 2007 2:21 utc | 86

just got an email saying 9 more US troops have been killed.
It seems like this nightmare will never end.

Posted by: Susan | Apr 29 2007 2:38 utc | 87

GI Special 5D28 – Nothing Good About Our Occupation

[Sgt. Kevin Benderman was sent to military prison at Ft. Lewis after refusing a second deployment to Iraq. His powerful condemnation of the war, based on his first hand experience, marked a huge step forward for opposition to the war inside the armed forces. Respect to him, and to Monica Benderman, who fought courageously, implacably and highly intelligently on his behalf every step of the way. They represent what is best about our armed forces. T]
From: Monica Benderman
To: GI Special
Sent: April 28, 2007 8:52 AM
Subject: Iraqi prisoners of war
HI Tom
The picture in the last GI Special which shows the hooded Iraqi man with electrical wires attached to his arms is a picture of a man named Haj Ali. You may or not already have known his name.
What is special about that man to us — a week after Kevin was sent to the Ft. Lewis stockade I received an email from Iraq.
It was from Haj Ali. He had been following Kevin’s case, as had members of his Prisoners of the Iraq War organization.
He and the members of his organization had voted to include Kevin as an honorary member in their society.
Ever since he and his fellow former prisoners of war have remained in contact asking about Kevin, sending information about the resistance there and what is really going on, and telling the stories of other former prisoners as they become free.
Monica Benderman

You may say “Yeah, but I know Christopher Nogle, and Christopher Nogle ain’t no Kevin Benderman.”
Well, I don’t think you know Christopher Nogle. I don’t either. I think that it’s much less likely for an officer, for the son of an officer, to do the “right thing” than for an enlisted man. But I don’t believe it’s impossible. Kevin Benderman wore your “perpetrator” star, r’giap, before he stood up and “just said no”.
I’ll tell you when I’m most furious with myself. I’m most furious with myself when the thrill of righteousness courses through my veins as I contemplate the monstrosity of the world of humans… and look for someone to blame. Other than myself, of course. I am enlightened. I am, in my own lights, erudite. I am the arbiter of others behavior. I make myself sick to my stomach.
Reading the pure vitriol in some of the posts above, the righteous justification… makes me sick to my stomach.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 29 2007 3:03 utc | 88

I’ve been following this thread for a week, and so it’s time to put in a word–a brief word that is free, I hope, of vitriol or righteous justification (my own, or my word’s).
Americans do not belong in Iraq. They have no business being there–carrying on like cowboys, treating Iraqis like Indians. But alas, they have no intention of leaving–not ever. They intend to stay until they have quelled the Iraqi resistance.
I don’t favor this at all. I want the resistance to prevail, and for this to happen, the Iraqis will have to kill the Americans–all of them, logically speaking. This is something I favor. I hope it happens.
Anecdotes, however moving, don’t interest me at all, and I take no interest in “justice” of any kind. I’m not interested in the welfare of civilization, and I’m not interested in political harmony as such. I just want the Iraqis to kill the Americans on their soil until no Americans are left there.
In effect, I favor the death penalty for Americans in Iraq. And since I’ve spent fifty years opposing the death penalty in the U.S.A., this rather surprises me–but let the Iraqis proceed as they may.

Posted by: alabama | Apr 29 2007 8:24 utc | 89

alabama,
I understand your point but I must say I truly wish you could say it in a way that would be less brutal. Openly hoping for the death of my fellow countrymen is hard to do. yours will be a hard sell. I do believe you can come up with similar results using different methods.
the statement you made can easily be used by warmongers to point out just how wacky the antiwar folks are.

Posted by: dan of steele | Apr 29 2007 21:26 utc | 90

dan
alabama is simply enunciating what is essentially – a basic truth
that is the armies of the united states will only leave because of their defeat
the only reason the u s left indo china was because they were losing, or rather they had no possibility of ‘winning’

Posted by: r’giap | Apr 29 2007 22:16 utc | 91

dos, it sounds horrid, i know perfectly well. it is brutal. i have read it over and over in all it startling simplicity.
some days, and today is one of them, last night for some reason was so frustrating for me, when i chose to look at the full implications of what we are doing in iraq. if one truly believes in the totality of the evil of AEI, cheney, the neocons it is practically impossible to not let ones mind wander into the morass of thought leading to the depth of what they are capable of.
what are our options here? if one believes first and foremost one’s desire is to have iraq solely in the control of iraqis naturally one is going to wish for an american withdrawl. the faster the better. i do not want americans to die in iraq. not one. with the exception of handing over bush and cheney and their ilk for the iraqis to deliver them whatever justice they think is appropriate being the exception.
but let me ask you this, if we don’t leave what then is our choice? do we suspend reality and believe america can prevail in bringing peace to iraq? do we support america being there forever in some quest to maintain a security we cannot maintain? do we go against our basic instinct that the US is doing,what our more recent history shows we do in war, creating chaos and havok and false flag operations. do we pretend mercenaries are acting in the best interest of the iraqi people? do we pretend oil is not a goal? do we pretend the biggest consumer of that oil is not the US military? do we pretend the military needs this oil to proceed to wage war for the military industrial complex?
we either drink some koolaid or we don’t. we either believe in our hearts the people ruling our country are evil or not. yes it matters that we have honorable people in our service who are used by the masters of war, innocent of all evil intent volunteering for what they believe to be a courageous mission. of course i do not want these people to die.
so we come to a cross roads don’t we. we either support the war crimes of our evil leaders or we support the eradication of our troops from iraq. which is it?
the eradication of our troops from iraq can come in two forms. death being one option. a horrible option. a hideous option. if you discount it what you are doing is inevitably supporting iraq in a permanent state of servitude to america, the US military one step closer to global domination, including what many people already consider an implementor of genocide.
this is not a choice i chose to make. it is a choice i am being forced to make. we all are. why do you think we fight so hard to bring the troops home?? because the alternative gives us two choices and some of us simply cannot live w/either of them.
we have 160,000 troops in iraq. we have the potential of millions more iraqis dying. as a human, where are your loyalties.
over 3,000 americans have died in this war. terrible. what weighs on your conscious more? them, or the million iraqis?
is the death of 3,000 americans, no matter how brave or honorable, more valuable than the million that have died as a result of our illegal invasion?
this is the stark reality of not supporting the war. if we cannot bring them home, what alternatives do we have?
for every american who has died in this war aprox 300 iraqis have died. place them in front of you in your mind. place one american next to them. you have to make a choice, 300 iraqi dead, or one american. could you in good conscious choose the one american?
the rate of death for americans and iraqis are going up, not down. the deaths from the car bombs are not being included in the results of the ‘surge’ that are used to conclude we are making ‘progress’.
how long were we in vietnam? this could go on for another decade. do you support the US out of iraq whatever it takes? this is the harsh reality. iraqis will never stop fighting for their country. if we were invaded would we? never. it is completely reasonable to think if we stayed we would have to revert to a roman option to ever get them to stop fighting. i cannot have millions dead on my conscious. i cannot have our military dead on my conscious.
in the final analysis for me it comes down to me and my maker. am i first a member of the human race, or a member of my country.
i’m choosing humanity, a sofie’s choice. this is the horrible dilemna we are faced with, those of us who do not trust the criminals running the country. if we cannot bring them home the options are just hideous, because the cream of the crop of military intelligence tells us we cannot win militarily in iraq. it is impossible. it is a suicide mission that the greed mongers have sent our military to fight. iraqis shouldn’t have to pay the price for that but they pay it every day.
a terrible crime has been committed. the deaths of our soldiers is the price we are paying. they will pay and pay until we bring them home. our military is being bled. it is impossible to support the troops and allow them to bleed. the war is killing our military, not alabama. he is just making the only inevitable moral choice his conscious has made available under the circumstances the criminals running our foreign policy have allowed.
that said, i know what you mean, it totally grated against my being to read it.

Posted by: annie | Apr 29 2007 23:04 utc | 92

dan of steele and annie, I would like nothing better than the chance to say something–anything!–that is not brutal, and that does not engage in “trimming”.
I do not write for the benefit of the opposition–either for their instruction, or for the perverse opportunity to mock these words–because they cannot touch the truth. They cannot go near it. It will burn them if they do.
These words will burn them.
Nor do I claim to have separated myself from the opposition in any politically meaningful way (I pay my taxes, after all).
Their shame and their crimes are also mine. But I can still attempt to tell the true from the not-true, and to put it out there in words that are not to be evaded–not by me, and not by anyone else. I find some kind of hope in this gesture–a promise of some kind–but let me confess that I have absolutely no idea of what that promise might be. At least it does not feel like the hopelessness of a timid mutism (my general way of being, if you will).

Posted by: alabama | Apr 29 2007 23:27 utc | 93

annie, I don’t disagree with you or alabama when it comes to the desired solution. I just don’t like the stark ugliness of what alabama proposes. wishing for the death of someone lessens you i believe.
let’s break it down, the goal is to stop the killing of the Iraqis and the destruction of their homeland. how to arrive at that point is the challenge. for me, the solution would be a voluntary withdrawal with reparations because it is the “right” thing to do. surely there exists another similar or even better plan, we just need to find it and convince the ptb that it was their idea all along.
piece of cake, right?

Posted by: dan of steele | Apr 29 2007 23:29 utc | 94

piece of cake, right?
in a friedman unit lemons will be in season, let’s make lemon meringue pie shall we?

Posted by: annie | Apr 29 2007 23:47 utc | 95

dan of steele, I would prefer to sharpen (and thereby to clarify) some of the more awkward features of my thinking here.
What am I espousing? Fratricide? “Friendly fire”? Civil War?
Something of the sort, or so it seems.
How does one get there? Where does one go? These are interesting questions, and I wouldn’t have known to raise them if you hadn’t complained.
Thank you!

Posted by: alabama | Apr 30 2007 0:02 utc | 96

oh heavens

Posted by: annie | Apr 30 2007 0:33 utc | 97

‘ the Iraqis will have to kill the Americans–all of them, logically speaking. This is something I favor. I hope it happens. ‘
‘ for every american who has died in this war aprox 300 iraqis have died. place them in front of you in your mind. place one american next to them. you have to make a choice, 300 iraqi dead, or one american. could you in good conscious choose the one american? ‘
These presuppose the choice of war to begin with.
This thread has taken leave of reality and wing into solipsism.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Apr 30 2007 0:37 utc | 98

Nogle sounds very thoughtful to me. Hopefully, he will survive as did anna missed and rememberinggiap, and get time to see his thoughts through.
But that won’t happen because he is innocent or unconvicted of his own sins. Rather, he would be like the rest of us, somehow escaping justice long enough to earn and make his own atonement. And even that would not make him or us any less guilty.
Who would survive if we all got “justice”?
As soon as we begin to see grounds to kill some and to identify with others, our minds rush in and show us a long list of people in the “kill” category. And then we are Cain.
I know the record. I know it’s likely we won’t pull out of Iraq until it is made obvious that Iraqi resistance will bleed the U.S, dry. But I also am certain that the old ways have to change if we are to survive the nuclear age, and I know that war after war can sicken a people. So, I’m pushing for Nogle and the rest of the troops leaving Iraq at least a step sooner than we left Vietnam. I’m pushing for war crimes trials (for those who started the war) and election crime trials that made the war possible in the first place. How else will we keep from doing it again? Does this require alabama’s vision too?

Posted by: citizen | Apr 30 2007 0:41 utc | 99

you are right JFL. we just have to get them back as fast as possible, the inevitable alternatives are much too drastic.

Posted by: annie | Apr 30 2007 1:31 utc | 100