Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 9, 2007
Diplomatic Conference

Mortar rain willing, there will be an international diplomatic conference in Baghdad tomorrow. Iraq, its immediate neighbors, Israel and the occupier will attend.

Some moderates have lauded this as a new approach and change in policy by the Cheney administration. But if this is serious diplomacy, we need a new word for comedy:

The official administration line, as articulated by Mr. Satterfield on Thursday before he was scheduled to head to Baghdad, is that he and Mr. Khalilzad will attend Saturday’s meeting, sit around the table with Iraq’s neighbors and talk about all the ways America and the region can help Iraq.

After four years of U.S. help (fourteen years if one includes the devastating sanctions), the Iraqis may be reluctant to even chuckle about that joke.

Even more diplomatic:

At the Saturday meeting, the Americans are scheduled to make a presentation to the overall group reiterating the oft-repeated United States accusation that Iran is providing material and training to Shiite militias that are being used in attacks against American troops. The United States also accuses Syria of allowing operatives from Al Qaeda to cross into Iraq.

Iran and Syria will be “posed with the issue of how they respond, not in a bilateral exchange, but to respond to a multilateral conference where Iraq is very much front and center,” Mr. Satterfield said.

There are rumors that during lunch former Sec-State Powell will jump from the cake and serve as dessert Anthrax vials labeled "Made in Iran – Best before Christmas."

Of course the Iranians and Syrians will have a good laugh at this while diplomats from the other nations may just yawn.

The whole show is a setup with only one intention –  to prove to the moderates within the U.S. elite that the administration is willing to do some serious diplomacy, but that Iran and Syria are unwilling to be appropriate partners.

Expect some sad editorials and grieving experts on the Sunday shows to lament how unfortunate the Iranian and Syrian approach is and how now, after serious diplomacy has been tried, only force will lead to their enlightenment.

PS: In case you wonder which Israeli diplomat is attending, here is the simple answer:

The second-highest diplomat at the United States Embassy in Baghdad is one of the anonymous government officials cited in an Aug. 4 indictment as having provided classified information to an employee of a pro-Israel lobbying group, people who have been officially briefed on the case said Wednesday.

The diplomat, David M. Satterfield, was identified in the indictment as a United States government official, "USGO-2," the people briefed on the matter said.

Comments

thank you for that, b

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Mar 9 2007 22:31 utc | 1

Thanks b, and nice catch on Satterfield. Sure puts thing in perspective, eh?
I’d like to see one beltway journalist ask Tony Snow, or Robert Gates, or General Patreus, or General Odeirno, or somebody the following questions:
“Which group is responsible for most of the attacks on Coalition forces, Sunni insurgents, or Shi’ite militias”?
and,
“Do you believe the Iranian groups that are allegedly moving weapons into Iraq would give them to Sunni insurgent groups?”
or this:
“If the U.S. did attack Iran, with whom would the Iraqi Government side, the U.S. or Iran?”

Posted by: FuzzFinger | Mar 9 2007 23:04 utc | 2

You say that Israel will be attending the Baghdad Conference today.
You MUST be wrong with this information. None of the arab states would be attending if that were so.
And anyway ,why Israel? It does not border Iraq,and it is represented there by the USA,which always acts at Israeli commands doesn’t it?

Posted by: deblonay | Mar 10 2007 1:53 utc | 3

NPR had a few laughs about this “orange juice” discussion on Friday, but B, your insight about the U.S. State Department official is something that of course, wasn’t mentioned. Thank you again B, for your quick and valuable work.
I too assume the U.S. will waste any opportunity for real progress and instead, just use this summit to further slam Iran on the world stage.

Posted by: Rick | Mar 10 2007 8:48 utc | 4

deblonay :
I think it’s b’s deadpan delivery. It catches me all the time as well. My brother used to play me for a fool in the same way.
I think he means that David M. Satterfield is as good as an Israeli mole.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Mar 10 2007 10:57 utc | 5

deblonay:
Yes, he likes to pull your leg.
And mine is so easy to pull. I once worked with a poverty program teaching rural low-income African-Americans some lowtech agricultural techniques. They used to tease me for having a ‘rubber leg’ because they knew they could pull on it so much.

Posted by: Jake | Mar 11 2007 0:10 utc | 6

You say that Israel will be attending the Baghdad Conference today.
You MUST be wrong with this information.

another new moon blogger for israel! i love the way you guys just happen to show up when b mentions israel.
of course israel will not really be there as it is a country and cannot physically transport itself! however satterfield as an agent of AIPAC will be there, so israel will be represented. i think that is the point.
also, we do business w/israel all the time in iraq, weapons etc.

Posted by: annie | Mar 11 2007 0:39 utc | 7

Hi annie.
I am very familiar with the horrors of israel in the world.
And I thank you deeply for the interest you and others have in that issue, and the insights and heads-up that people post here.
I was just refering to how the B can be pulling your leg sometimes. He sucks me in, such as when he recently Top Level posted that the WH admited Bin Laden was a fabrication (or some similar bs grabber).
I’ll tell you, this forum is the BEST for catching stories about things such as the Satterfield involvement in Iraq. The US is made more serious at the table because of a man of his background and stature? Gimme a break! Might as well wear his slimeball AIPAC credentials right on his shirt

Posted by: Jake | Mar 11 2007 18:42 utc | 8

You MUST be wrong with this information
No, really, it’s true.
Satterfield was there.

Posted by: kelley b. | Mar 11 2007 23:15 utc | 9

The journalist continues: Rice’s allies in this include new UN ambassador Khalilzad, new Iraq ambassador Crocker, and Satterfield.
missing links
i didn’t realize satterfield was a new ambassador..

Posted by: annie | Mar 13 2007 21:09 utc | 10