With Putin’s speech at the Munich Security Policy conference, Russia is back.
One wonders what took it so long. Yes, the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the catastrophic neoliberal privatization of the Yeltzin years had taken their toll. But under Putin the oligarchs were finally told to behave and rule of law was restored. Increasing commodity prices allowed paying off Russia’s international debt.
Still during the recent years little could be seen of Russia’s international aura. Western financed NGOs stage managed one color revolution after the other. The EU swallowed the economic realm and in its steps, and against all past promises, NATO followed.
Now Russia said "’nuff". The last drop in the bucket were the U.S. plans to install parts of its missile defense system in eastern Europe. This neither makes sense to protect Europe, nor is it geographically relevant against (nonexistent) missiles from Iran or North Korea. The only plausible reason for these new weapons is to break the Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) balance that protected against a nuclear exchange during the cold war.
This and the accusations of human rights violations and autocratic behavior, of the U.S. imperialists and Abu Ghraib torturers, brought Russia back to the international scene.
Putin made clear that from now on, the rules are different and further unilateral behavior of the U.S. will not be condoned:
[W]hat is a unipolar world? However one might embellish this term, at the end of the day it refers to one type of situation, namely one centre of authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision-making.
It is world in which there is one master, one sovereign. And at the end of the day this
is pernicious not only for all those within this system, but also for
the sovereign itself because it destroys itself from within.And this certainly has nothing in common with democracy. Because, as
you know, democracy is the power of the majority in light of the
interests and opinions of the minority.Incidentally, Russia – we – are constantly being taught about
democracy. But for some reason those who teach us do not want to learn
themselves.I consider that the unipolar model is not only unacceptable but also
impossible in today’s world. And this is not only because if there was
individual leadership in today’s – and precisely in today’s – world,
then the military, political and economic resources would not suffice. What
is even more important is that the model itself is flawed because at
its basis there is and can be no moral foundations for modern
civilisation.
[…]
In conclusion I would like to note the following. We very often – and
personally, I very often – hear appeals by our partners, including our
European partners, to the effect that Russia should play an
increasingly active role in world affairs.In connection with this I would allow myself to make one small
remark. It is hardly necessary to incite us to do so. Russia is a
country with a history that spans more than a thousand years and has
practically always used the privilege to carry out an independent foreign policy.We are not going to change this tradition today. At the same time, we
are well aware of how the world has changed and we have a realistic
sense of our own opportunities and potential. And of course we would
like to interact with responsible and independent partners with whom we
could work together in constructing a fair and democratic world order
that would ensure security and prosperity not only for a select few,
but for all.This new assertiveness has immediate influence on possible Kosovo
solutions, on the war on Iran and any roadmap non-steps in Palestine.
I for one welcome this development and hope especially that European countries will again recognize where their real interests are.
PS: I recommend to read the speech in full. It’s good.