Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 19, 2006
Punditry

Frank Rich is damning the paper we is writing for:

ELECTIONS may come and go, but Washington remains incorrigible. Not even voters delivering a clear message can topple the town’s conventional wisdom once it has been set in the stone of punditry.

Right now the capital is entranced by a fictional story line about the Democrats. As this narrative goes, the party’s sweep of Congress was more or less an accident. .. And now the party is deeply divided as its old liberals and new conservatives converge on Capitol Hill to slug it out.
It’s Not the Democrats Who Are Divided (liberated version), (emphasis added)
NYT OpEd, Nov. 19, 2006

Rich is right here of course – the "split" that is seen within the Democrats is pure fictional. There are discussions in any party. Racist lover Trend Lott was voted to House minority leader with just one vote lead. It is obvious that the Republicans are the ones who are more divided.

But facts do not keep Rich’s colleagues away from writing just the fake stories he is damning – on the same day, in the same publication, on the front page.

Democrats Split on How Far to Go With Ethics Law

After railing for months against Congressional corruption under Republican rule, Democrats on Capitol Hill are divided on how far their proposed ethics overhaul should go.
[…]
Some Democrats say their election is a mandate for more sweeping changes, and many newly elected candidates — citing scandals involving several Republican lawmakers last year — made Congressional ethics a major issue during the campaign.

Bigot punditry all over – of course there is discussion. But the same discussion is happening within the GOP. But the "liberal" NYT will not touch on that party.

Rich should think about changing the publication … they may fire him soon anyway.

Comments

b:
Don’t worry. Frank Rich still works for the NYTimes :

The only veto it [the Demoplican party] can exercise is to cut off the war’s funding, political suicide that the Congressional leadership has rightly ruled out. The plain reality is that the victorious Democrats, united in opposition to the war and uniting around a program for quitting it, have done pretty much all they can do.

As far as I can tell, the moment of truth came for Frank Rich a few weeks after 9/11. In the midst of all the absurdities that began to be bandied about then and have passed for journalism ever since, Frank Rich wrote a blistering op-ed calling things by their right names. The uproar was immediate. Rich was banished to the magazine for a couple of years. He was allowed back out of the closet about the same time Judith Miller was escorted to the front door and bid a fond farewell. He’s a very bright man, an astute critic of politics and other drama. But he works for the NYTimes.
The NYTimes : nothing can be done.
I don’t give a damn if it’s political suicide for the Demoplicans to cut off the funding. It’s suicide of a very different, of the very REAL order for our American troops to continue to shuffle off to Iraq to prevent this putative, phony, political suicide by the Demoplicans. For avoiding that hypothetical suicide has then become the rationale for this war that the Demoplicans as much as the Republicrats began in the face of HUGE popular resistance.
In fact, if these Demoplican bastards were up to commiting real suicide I’d buy the bullets. Then real Democrats could kick their carcasses out of the way as they marched into our capitol and ended the funding, the war, and the continuing suicide of REAL men and women, Americans and Iraqis, set in motion in the Middle East by these traitorous War Criminals.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Nov 19 2006 9:57 utc | 1

JFL,
I hear you all the way. Its unconscionable. Moreso if the Baker report turns out to be a farce. Its taking months to get the report out as more & more people die every day.
But I’m not sure how to reconcile “HUGE popular resistance” with 70% or so public support for the Iraq war initially.
Theres also the issue of what the public was led to beleieve but thats another matter.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Nov 19 2006 12:02 utc | 2

The Owners of our Ownership Society are those persons who own actual shares in America’s corporations. These legal entities, who are considered Super Persons under American law, increasingly own all the physical and financial assets of the country, and face fewer and fewer consequences for operating them without regard for the common good.
These legal entities are increasingly international in nature and financing and operations. They have no more loyalty to any one country or currency than they do to raw numbers on a spreadsheet.
These Owners are increasingly recognizable as America’s foreign lenders — the Saudis, the Japanese banks, the Chinese and Asian banks. More and more of the physical and financial assets of America belong to them — every day — than belong to Americans. It’s all legal and correct. They bought them up fair and square with solid money. That isn’t the issue.
It is this: whether these Owners be foreign or native, it is not in their interest to have the huge, consumer-driven American marketplace reverse its mad shopping spree, or drive less, or save more, or become more energy efficient, or reduce its carbon footprint and emmissions at the expense of industry, or to return control of its political apparatus to the people instead of the corporations. None of that is the reason they invest in American assets, mortgages, loans or government.
They want America strung out, baby, and bleeding assets and money. If America decides to start living within its means, and saving for the future, and passing on surpluses to the next generation, and rebuilding its energy and industrial sectors then control of America’s physical and financial assets will begin to slip away from the current Owners, and back to America’s working class.
The American Dream is a real nightmare to the current Owners, be they foreign or native.
The Owners like things the way they are headed right now. No change is welcome, or going to be welcomed, or going to be permitted if these Super Persons have any say in it. They prefer to keep things rolling along, to keep bleeding the remaining assets and efforts of the middle and lower classes into higher, tighter hands.
They prefer to put the whole population, and the next two American generations, in hock up to their ears. That’s the Owner’s goal. Call it consumer culture, write up TV adverts and happy jingles about consumer toys, offer discounts and deals on all sides, make the rubes come to the malls, and mortgage their homes to do so. That’s the goal. Git ‘r done!
These next few years in America’s experiment in self-government are either going to be organized around reversing this class warfare, this bleeding out of a dying empire, or it is going to be a lot of smoke and noise and screaming about inane political puppet shows of absurd proportions, with the end result that things keep rolling along.
Nothing short of a massive, popular uprising against this institutionalized theft will change the absurd course we are on.
Nothing can cause — or prevent — that uprising as effectively as our national media. That means, right now, a free press freely informing an awakened electorate is where the entire battle lies.
Right now, that media belongs to the Owners. And it lies. And lies. And lies. The Owners view is the only view permitted. The only ads allowed are for politicians backing the Owners. All bloggers, pundits, news anchors, letter writers, and unwashed persons are the Enemy, and they are to be hushed, ridiculed, and destroyed.
Once the dollar “devalues sharply,” and the American populace wakes up to find that the dollar in their pocket is worth a dime, and the nation’s physical and financial assets belong entirely to a very few, very wealthy Owners it will be entirely too late. Even bloody revolution will be of little avail at that point.
The only political events of the coming two years that will matter, in the long run, are efforts for a free American press and an informed American electorate.
Change will not come from politicians of any sort or stripe. It is not in their power to make such changes. They are representatives of the Owners, or they wouldn’t be there. They were funded by the Owners, and elected by uninformed lemmings.
The change will come from the people, and it will need to overwhelm the media, and the government, and the Owners.
We citizens pass the bottle, place our bets, stare at this tipping point in America’s history, and face a private choice of gambling on it, investing in it, swimming upstream, or getting the hell out of the river.
Only a precious few Americans will be delighted with where we are headed.

Posted by: Antifa | Nov 19 2006 12:53 utc | 3

@Antifa (#3)
I agree wholeheartedly with all of your observations save this one: “The change will come from the people, and it will need to overwhelm the media, and the government, and the Owners”, which sounds to my ear like the “inevitable” revolution Karl and Friedrich concluded we were headed for.
Problem is, those Owners you bring up can and have come to the same conclusions we have and can move to circumvent it. Religion ain’t the only opiate in the medicine chest. We speak of a complicit media as if it were incidental to everything else we’re seeing, a happy happenstance if you’re a Super Person. We like to joke about how stupid Bush et al are, but they’re still getting everything they wanted at the end of the day. I have trouble coming to the conclusion that’s a coincidence.
I agree that the only place substantive change could come from is the people, but not as long as we embrace the meme that the Owners are idiots (how many Bushes does it take to screw up a light bulb?)and that the whole sorry state of affairs just serendipitously happened to their benefit. That’s a whole lot of baggage and cold comfort to be asking the people to throw off, and I’m not especially optimistic that they’re up to it… not blaming them, mind you, just collating the data as they say.
Apart from that tiny little bit of semantics, I’m right there on the same page with you.

Posted by: Monolycus | Nov 19 2006 13:15 utc | 4

jbc:
I remember millions in the streets before the war began.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Nov 19 2006 13:58 utc | 5

Yeah. My bookie, Vince, says don’t back Da People on this one. Says the vig on all this shit is gonna be a bitch, right down to the seventh generation an’ then some. Says don’t back the rubes, babe. Ever.
But when I stare into the abyss it stares right back. If I run to Nepal or Costa Rica or the moon, the Owners will still get to me and mine in good time. I may be fine during my fourscore and some, but when I look into my grandson’s or any child’s eyes I will see a born slave and not a free human being, if the Owners have their way. That’s not okay with me even now. It won’t be any better anywhere on the planet.
So I guess I’m gonna fight. Can’t go along with this and live with myself. There it is. I suspect a whole lot of Americans are spoiling for this kind of fight, too, if they knew a smart way to do it. The Owners sure do work at keeping the facts, the pitchforks, and the torches all locked away.
Congress is not the solution, it is a distraction. The narcissists there will do what they are paid or forced to do, nothing else or more.
Getting the facts, the torches and the pitchforks into people’s hands is job one. My grandson is sitting here this morning, playing with plastic, pretend monsters that devour people whole. He has no idea. I can’t let him walk into economic serfdom or slavery, and I can’t let your kid either, and I can’t look any child in the eye ever again if I’m not fighting like two demons. Can’t do it.
Like one of those shoeless bastards in a tent at Valley Forge, I’d really like to skip, to get out of this fight, but I can’t face myself or my family if I don’t see my people free of priests and kings first.
Fuck ’em. It’s on.

Posted by: Antifa | Nov 19 2006 14:38 utc | 6

the other day, I was wondering if things would be any diferent if a viable progressive third party existed. One thats able to pick up even 10% of House & Senate seats.
its not likely this is going to happen anytime soon. What it really comes down to in the present balance is we have the Dems & Repubs fighting over a thin slice of voters (the so called swing votters) in the middle. And theres the large segments of the voting public that are prettty much captive because they are’nt going to vote for the other party under most circumstances. But many would consider voting for a third-party candidate with a decent shot.
A viable third party could really shake things up and compel positive action on many fronts. But this is just one more thing thats not likely to happen anytime soon.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Nov 19 2006 15:12 utc | 7

@Antifa, Jony and John Francis
We need a metric shitload more just like you guys… but damned if it isn’t bouying to know types like you are still out there and haven’t had your Common Sense subdued by the Paine of the times we live in. I’m honored to work alongside you for the common good.

Posted by: Monolycus | Nov 19 2006 16:07 utc | 8

jbc, my thoughts as well. even daydreamed for a moment that russ feingold might be the candidate. then i woke up.
antifa, you are so right. kalle lasn called this in adbusters 3-4 years ago. my question is – how to open people’s eyes? how to get them to step away from the television? how to get them to see the nyt for what it is? what are the chances people will substitute an adbusters for a nyt? i noticed friday night at barnes & noble that lasn has published an enormous volume, but unfortunately my dog started to get into something with another dog in the graphics section and it made sense to leave.
in conversations with people at work and at school, i sense things changing but most still want to return to their consumerist coccoon. in looking at utilitarianism in the ethics class i took last year, we discussed a social where 10% of the population is slaves and the remainder masters. the slaves were provided with the basic physical comforts of live – good housing, reasonable working hours, nutritious food, entertainment (tv, music, movies, etc.). the slaves do not feel much discomfort and the masters feel great they have slaves and it makes their lives better. isn’t this in essence where we have ended up, except with a different ratio of slaves to masters? from a utilitarian’s point of view an arrangement like this could conceivably work if certain limits with respect to justice and human rights were applied and also if the ratio of slaves to masters did not increase. we have well-exceeded 10%, what will it take for the scale to tip regarding justice and human rights? how far will things go before people act?
when i begin talking about how bad things are people’s eyes glaze over. they don’t want to hear it. they want to return to the safety of convention. how do we reach people before it is too late? what will be the critical moment where they realize what is happening and how do we reach them without being dismissed as too radical?

Posted by: conchita | Nov 19 2006 20:00 utc | 9

how do we reach people before it is too late? #9
By keeping on keeping on what you are doing right here and in your non-blog life conchita. It’s working.
Your and other’s postings here have affected some of my friends lives through me. If I hadn’t met y’all here, my intellectual ammunition cache would not be what it is today.
I have my most conscious and sensitive emotional antennae out whenever trying to “educate” (egoic presupposition) my friends. At the first sign of ‘glazed eyes’ I back off. I don’t think I’ve totally pissed off more than a handful of potential friends since living in these parts (16 years).
Cheers. Keep up the good work. My daughter will live to appreciate your efforts. I’m off to hear James Hunter tonight. “best kept secret in British r&b”, Van Morrison.

Posted by: Juannie | Nov 19 2006 20:51 utc | 10

conchita@9,
I think you are definitely reaching people. Its just going to be a slow process.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Nov 19 2006 21:10 utc | 11

a spark can start a prairie fire – mao tse tung

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 19 2006 21:14 utc | 12

Cool to be blue.

Posted by: beq | Nov 19 2006 23:51 utc | 13