Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 7, 2006
Election Results?

I don’t have any yet and will drop to bed (for US elections, this is the wrong timezone). But you may have some results by now. Let us know in the comments …

Comments

The government won. (Sorry I just couldn’t resist.)

Posted by: edwin | Nov 7 2006 23:46 utc | 1

Sweet dreams b.

Posted by: beq | Nov 8 2006 0:01 utc | 2

Uh, something about deck chairs? titanic?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Nov 8 2006 0:06 utc | 3

VT–supposedly called for Bernie Sanders (duh!)

Posted by: tzs | Nov 8 2006 0:15 utc | 4

Bernie Sanders is a democratic socialist, btw. I don’t know how many other socialists have been U.S. Senators (I took a quick look but didn’t find), exactly, but not many if any. something to note.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 8 2006 1:31 utc | 5

Looks like we won’t have Katherine Harris’ unfortunate couture and nightmarish makeup to laugh at anymore.

Posted by: montysano | Nov 8 2006 1:38 utc | 6

From Reuters :

Democrat Bob Casey defeated incumbent Republican Sen. Rick Santorum in Pennsylvania Tuesday, capturing an important seat in the party’s effort to retake control of the Senate from Republicans.
CHICAGO, Nov 7 (Reuters) – Voters in Ohio elected a Democrat as governor for the first time in 16 years on Tuesday, taking one of several states destined to be key battlegrounds in the 2008 presidential race.
WASHINGTON, Nov 7 (Reuters) – Indiana Democratic sheriff Brad Ellsworth ousted six-term Republican Rep. John Hostettler on Tuesday, boosting Democratic efforts to gain control of the House of Representatives.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Nov 8 2006 1:43 utc | 7

You can write that book now Katherine.

Posted by: beq | Nov 8 2006 1:48 utc | 8

mark shields is complemented on newshour by “political analyst” ramesh punuru.
what a joke. shields must endure breathing the same air as ramesh.
it may as well be james joyce and harold robbins talking about novels of zane gray on booknotes.

Posted by: slothrop | Nov 8 2006 1:48 utc | 9

Ken Blackwell, the guy who made sure Bush got Ohio in 04, seems to have lost to the Democratic candidate running for mayor. 3 to 1 voting against him (or for the other guy.)

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 8 2006 1:49 utc | 10

d’uh. governor, not mayor.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 8 2006 1:50 utc | 11

Menendez in.

Posted by: beq | Nov 8 2006 1:50 utc | 12

looks like deval patrick is the new governor of massachusetts. hope jon bonifaz pulls through.

Posted by: conchita | Nov 8 2006 1:54 utc | 13

sherrod brown is also the new democratic senator from ohio.

Posted by: conchita | Nov 8 2006 1:55 utc | 14

LOL. For this link to Americablog, start down at the bottom of the page and scroll up for the Santorum photos.
btw, He’s toast, so it seems.
Hope Weldon soon follows.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 8 2006 1:57 utc | 15

Here’s one for the house…
Hostetler, a guy who claimed that abortion gave women breast cancer, seems to have lost…so add one more seat in the house for a democrat.
I want investigations. I want resignations.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 8 2006 2:07 utc | 16

So we can still kick Lieberman around.

Posted by: beq | Nov 8 2006 2:14 utc | 17

Bernie Sanders occupies the Paul Wellstone Memorial Chair in the Senate. The American People are allowed one actual representative in the House of Peacocks. Bernie, you’re it! Enjoy!

Posted by: jj | Nov 8 2006 2:15 utc | 18

Amazingly faux, the first black governor was in Virginia. Douglas Wilder. Imagine. [He’s the elected mayor of Richmond now.]

Posted by: beq | Nov 8 2006 2:22 utc | 20

In KY, Yarmuth, the democrat, appears to have been elected to the house. So for now the democrats have picked up 2 seats in the house.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 8 2006 2:22 utc | 21

Ben Cardin Projected Winner in Maryland.

Posted by: beq | Nov 8 2006 2:25 utc | 22

Is there anyone besides Sanders we should give a shit about?
The only one I know is a House race in Ca. Richard Pombo, a radical anti-environmentalist who works tirelessly to eliminate the Endangered Species Act is running against a guy, ~jay McIrney, who’s at least a quasi-democrat, having defeated rahm emmanuel’s guy in primary.

Posted by: jj | Nov 8 2006 3:02 utc | 23

Weldon is out!

Posted by: MS | Nov 8 2006 3:43 utc | 24

Don Sherwood,the mistress beater in Penn. is out!

Posted by: R.L. | Nov 8 2006 3:52 utc | 25

The Senate seat in Rhode Island has gone to Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 4:03 utc | 26

damn, virginia is a nailbiter.

Posted by: conchita | Nov 8 2006 4:06 utc | 27

Democrat Keith Ellison has been elected as the nation’s first Muslim member of Congress, taking a House seat in Minnesota.

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 4:07 utc | 28

dems within one seat of taking the house.

Posted by: conchita | Nov 8 2006 4:11 utc | 29

All I can say is: BURN BABY BURN

Posted by: anna missed | Nov 8 2006 4:12 utc | 30

the house is now officially controlled by dems. let’s hope they vote like democrats.

Posted by: conchita | Nov 8 2006 4:23 utc | 31

just heard, wow speaker pelosi

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 4:25 utc | 32

cantwell survived

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 4:26 utc | 33

i am liking the sound of john conyers, judiciary committee chair. let the games begin.

Posted by: conchita | Nov 8 2006 4:30 utc | 34

cardin wins senate seat in maryland

Posted by: Anonymous | Nov 8 2006 4:39 utc | 35

Mehlman spinning like mad. Maryland back in play! Litigation coming! He’s just perking up…gonna be a long night in the Senate.
And Pelosi won’t be getting a call from Angrybush. Rove made the call, and he’s stomping off to bed with a warm JD on the rice.
Somehow that makes it even sweeter.

Posted by: canucklehead | Nov 8 2006 4:42 utc | 36

Had a chuckle while I thought about this… I read a few stories in the past few days voting machine glitches and sundry whatnot. Looking at these results, it would appear the Diebold machines actually aren’t functioning properly.
Two potential scenarios would account for it. (1.) Rove hasn’t quite grasped that no-bid contracts do not result in quality work, or (2.) Diebold machines are just more hackable than they are supposed to be.
I’m hoping the righter end of the blogosphere runs with scenario #2… it’d be good for the soul to hear a Republican screaming about a stolen election for a change. Maybe the situation would finally be addressed since we’re not allowed to discuss those sorts of things in polite company.
I’ll stop thinking about all of that now. I’d hate to give Polly Toynbee more fuel to denigrate me as a “conspiracy theorist”.

Posted by: Monolycus | Nov 8 2006 4:47 utc | 37

testers up by 6%
a very close race here headed for a recount w/ newcomer D darcy burner @ 50.23% vs (green river sheriff)reichert @49.77%. this has been a hotly contested race w/bush/cheney visits. 200 votes apart. this is mirroring the gov race that wasn’t settled for months here in wash state and then only w/a 100 vote spread.

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 5:01 utc | 38

looking better for webb. down to the last 20 or so precincts and they seem to be neck in neck. there are 13,0000 absentee ballots to be counted and general wisdom places them in webb’s camp, so….. chances are the work of ms. manners out there in virginia may be paying off!

Posted by: conchita | Nov 8 2006 5:07 utc | 39

looks like burns and allen are toast

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 5:17 utc | 40

is beq still up? these guys are neck n neck but i’m callin it for webb

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 5:20 utc | 41

McCaskill Closing fast.she’s behind but the votes that haven’t been counted are from heavy dem areas.

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 6:13 utc | 42

Duckworth loses Illinois House race
If Rahm Emanuel had kept his stinkin’ mobbed up AIPAC nose out of this race I’ll bet the Democrat in this district of Illinois, Cegelis, would have beat Roskam.
The DLC/Demoplicans would rather have a Republicrat than a Democrat in Congress.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Nov 8 2006 6:27 utc | 43

Meanwhile, using the US election as cover to murder more innocents in Palestine…
Israel kills 19 Palestinians in Gaza, W.Bank: medics

GAZA (Reuters) – Israeli tank fire killed 14 Palestinian civilians in Gaza on Wednesday while four gunmen and a civilian were killed during an Israeli raid in the occupied West Bank, Palestinian medical and security officials said.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Nov 8 2006 6:31 utc | 44

I saw state of the art in Riggable Voting Systems in my precinct. Sec. of State promised we could have paper ballots if we wanted. Last time that meant we could have them, but they were dumped in provisional hole, even if we showed up on the rolls. This time they dumped the computers & we all got paper. I thght. we’d won – until I got to stage II. After filling out yr. ballot, you feed it into a Sequoia machine to be counted!
Yes, Stalin’s comment came to mind. That’s the way to go. Let ’em all vote…don’t waste time on data entry…run the cattle through quickly, but fix the count outta sight.
Sad that you guys think that the JackAss Party should be rewarded w/victory for running Reactionary Woman Haters like Webb. You’re aiding & abetting building a two party system of Fascist & Near Fascist.

Posted by: jj | Nov 8 2006 6:34 utc | 45

meteor blades reports good news on the defeat on the abortion ban in south dakota on dkos. and i am going to bed slightly more secure that we can keep fascism slighting more at bay (maybe).

Posted by: conchita | Nov 8 2006 6:34 utc | 46

whoops meant to say slightly more at bay. celebratory wine takes its toll.

Posted by: conchita | Nov 8 2006 6:35 utc | 47

Not so quickly, Conchita. It was barely defeated AND Planned Parenthood didn’t campaign against it as a threat to choice. All the trash in the legislature have to do is outlaw abortion w/exceptions for rape & incest & there’s virtually no chance it will be challenged. So it’s a Disaster. Like Webb & Lamont running as “Democrats” rather than the Republicans they are & have always been, were they not too cowardly to fight to take back their own party.

Posted by: jj | Nov 8 2006 6:42 utc | 48

Reactionary Woman Haters like Webb.

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 6:46 utc | 49

If you think you control anything w/the JackAss Party an empty shell…

Posted by: jj | Nov 8 2006 6:52 utc | 50

Looks like McCaskill needs about 56% of the remaining vote to win, according CNN’s website.

Posted by: The Truth Gets Vicious When You Corner It | Nov 8 2006 6:59 utc | 51

Never mind — combination of old numbers and typo. McCaskill is ahead right now.

Posted by: The Truth Gets Vicious When You Corner It | Nov 8 2006 7:00 utc | 52

(23:06, PDST — That’s 11:06 At Night To You, Pacifistic Double-Summer Time in San Francisco, where it’s foggy and humid.)
In the House: ABC is giving a called net 24-seat gain (races where 90+% of the vote has been counted) so far to the Democrats, and the gravity-challenged female-gendered human has not yet sung.
In the Senate so far: Tester narrowly leads in Montans; McCaskill leads by 25K in Missouri; Ford did not win in Tennessee; and Webb leads by ~2,000 votes in Virginia — a recount certainty. Everyone seems to agree that control of the Senate may come down to the result of that recount, which wouldn’t be available until the end of the year.
Interesting — on Pox News, a giggling Bill Kristol said it appeared to him that the Democrats would take control in the Senate. I had to make certain I didn’t drop acid or hadn’t been reading The Economist; Billy-boy said this? PNAC flack and co-author (along with Perle and Feith) of the epic novel, “World Hegemony Or Bust!” and unindicted war criminal said that? Well, he was giggling… Maybe he was on acid…
The sock-puppet little punk who is the mouthpiece for the Cheney Presidency has scheduled a news conference for 1:00 PM Washington time, tomorrow. I wouldn’t be surprised if he angrily declared war on — well, some country — or exposed himself, or had a tentacle pop out of his forehead while on live television.
To me, it’s a little like 1931: Hindenburg and the Centrist-Left coalition took back some control in the Reichstag from the Communists and the nazis, and solidified their majority. However, the NSDAP was still a viable and dangerous party, and Joseph Goebbels still had plenty of ideas…

Posted by: Austin Cooper | Nov 8 2006 7:13 utc | 53

It all comes down to Va. Missouri & Montana went JackAss. Va. recount will be funny…on the other hand, if Va. goes to webb, Rumbo will step down, shrubbie will appt. lieberman SecDef & Repugs would take over again.

Posted by: jj | Nov 8 2006 7:23 utc | 54

@jj:

Depends. If all the people who are expecting the Democrats to show some spine now are right — you can’t see or hear me, so you’ll just have to take my word for it that I laughed a long and bitter laugh over that one — then in one important respect, the Republicans are now screwed: the Democrats can filibuster without having to worry that the Republicans will take their ball and go home. Granted, that won’t help actually pass any laws, but it would help shoot down some of the trash coming out of the right wing these days.

And now, shedding a tear for a utopian dream world which will never be, in which Democrats actually act as though they cared about doing the right thing, I’m heading off to bed.

Posted by: The Truth Gets Vicious When You Corner It | Nov 8 2006 7:59 utc | 55

There won’t be a recount in Virginia, the present margin is too large, and the Repub’s don’t want a 3-4 week period where all their dirty tricks are out for everyone to see, now that the nation has turned against them.
The press would work hard to look good now that the power equation has changed, and Rove knows it. He’s told Allen not to bother.
The recount in VA for State Attorney picked up 37 votes, on some three hundred that separated GOP and Dem candidate then. No way they’ll make up 11.000.
(Unless the Repub’s are stuffing the Provisional Ballot sacks tonight … They’re counted tomorrow).

Posted by: SteinL | Nov 8 2006 8:08 utc | 56

All the things that won’t change now that the DLC/Demoplicans are in charge…
Study: 57 unarmed Palestinian minors killed by IDF since June

A third of unarmed Palestinians killed during IDF operations in the Gaza Strip since the abduction of Gilad Shalit have been minors, according to a new report prepared by Physicians for Human Rights, to be published Wednesday.
Between June 27 and October 28, 247 Palestinians, including 155 civilians (63 percent) were killed by the IDF. Among the civilians killed, 57 were minors. This figure does not include minors who were armed.
The report also claims that of the 996 Palestinians injured during the past four months, about a third, 337, are children.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Nov 8 2006 8:36 utc | 57

+28 in the house, +5 in the senate and still counting. Worst possible outcome for the rovicondamentalists and their gong show ilk. I Do’nt think the bubble boy chiefton will hanker so much to being yanked out of his lair, taken Buffalo Bill style, and put out on the road for a little on public exhibition. With all those curious and staring eyes puzzling over his every detail — living perpetually in dread, that someone will go and shine a flashlight into his mouth. Yeah, if I where him, I’d be eatin potato chips for every meal.

Posted by: Anonymous | Nov 8 2006 10:09 utc | 58

@ annie (42) I’m up now.
πŸ™‚
When I heard that Hampton and NoVa precincts were still out I figured I could sleep.

Posted by: beq | Nov 8 2006 11:17 utc | 59

laugh all you want. what do you have to offer that’s better?
instead of sneering, why don’t you contact your representatives and note that the overwhelming dismissal of republicans was also a vote to investigate the corruption and to stop what has been happening as far as votes in committees, etc.?
in other words, what do you have to say that’s worthwhile if all you do is criticize but don’t contribute in any way that might actually facilitate changes? protesting in the streets is cathartic, but as barney frank noted, the most effective citizens groups, like aarp, don’t get into the streets, they organize and lobby as a bloc.
that’s the reality of politics. if it’s not good enough for you, then you exist outside of the realm of possibilities and have nothing worth listening to because you’ve lost before anything has gotten started.
if you’re going to lose, you should at least put up a realistic fight before the fact…at least, you know, try to do the right thing.
if you have one litmus test (like the right wingers and abortion) then you make yourself irrelevant. and that’s not me talking…that’s the most liberal of the liberals who actually create policy, etc.
politics is about the realm of the possible.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 8 2006 16:24 utc | 60

Tester wins. One to go.

Posted by: beq | Nov 8 2006 18:07 utc | 61

yeah!!! webbs winning to, i know it. think it will end in court of something?

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 18:20 utc | 62

Democrat wins Montana seat, ties Senate

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 18:25 utc | 63

Montana law may forbid Burns recount

Though Burns has not yet conceded, he’ll be unable to request a recount, RAW STORY has learned.
In 2005, Montana state code 13-16-201–the section concerning recounts in close or contested elections–states, “a candidate for a congressional office, a state or district office voted on in more than one county, the legislature, or judge of the district court is defeated by a margin not exceeding 1/4 of 1% of the total votes cast for all candidates for the same position.”
However, with all precincts apparently accounted for, and votes totalling 400,000, Burn trails Tester by 3000 votes. That margin, while slim, is greater than one-half of one-percent, and therefore not eligible for a state-sanctioned recount.

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2006 21:09 utc | 64

A little less momentous but still a slap in Bush’ face. Another Latin Country elects a Southpaw. Ortega wins Nicaraugua.

Posted by: pb | Nov 8 2006 21:12 utc | 65

I wish I were young enough to dance in the streets ‘cos rummie will resign. but as us old cynics know, off he goes to enjoy his blood money (tens of $M of it), living the life of Reilly, lolling at his ease atop his very own mound of skulls. he’ll die in his comfy bed with the best of medical care, just like all our other pet war criminals. and probably have a library or a college or something named after him.
nor have the Palestinians anything to dance about, as the J Post quietly exults, dateline yesterday:

US policy toward Israel is not expected to shift dramatically if Democrats take control of Congress. While Republican leaders have made efforts to overtly back Israel in recent years, analysts point to historic support for Israel among Democrats.
In recent weeks, Democrats have been working to counter concerns they would balance support for Israel and the Palestinians or that Democrats would name committee chairmen who are seen as traditionally unsupportive of the Jewish state.
“There will be some Democratic chairmen who may not share all my views or have as clear a perspective on Israel as I do,” Rep. Henry Waxman (D-California), a Jewish lawmaker, said in a recent on-line chat with Jewish voters, sponsored by the House Democratic caucus. “But they will not be chairing committees dealing with Israel and the Middle East.”
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee also weighed in. In a statement last week, it said, “Strong bipartisan support for Israel exists in both parties and, regardless of who is in control, that support will remain steadfast.”
“AIPAC works closely with leaders on both sides of the aisle, each deeply committed to strengthening the bonds between the United States and Israel,” the statement continued. “No matter who wins the upcoming elections, AIPAC is confident that Congress will continue to support a strong Israel and a strong relationship between the United States and its most reliable ally in the Middle East.”

nothing to see here folks, business as usual, move along now.

Posted by: DeAnander | Nov 8 2006 21:46 utc | 66

chris floyd writes

If anyone thinks the horrors of the Bush Imperium are somehow at an end – or will even be seriously impaired – by the results of yesterday’s election, they have a harsh and bitter awakening to come.
But still – the political situation we have today is better than what we had the day before. In a period of such deep crisis in the life of the Republic, and (to draw on Noam Chomsky) in a system of power so massive and far-reaching, even a small change can mean very real benefits to a good many people. (And to many good people.) And in any case, we should raise a glass to the American people for standing up – amidst the hailstorm of lies and bullshit thrown at them – and giving George W. Bush a resounding slap in the face. Long may he stew in this great and well-deserved humiliation.

plus, there was some satisfaction watching Il Dunce stumble around today

Posted by: b real | Nov 8 2006 23:39 utc | 67

Ralph Nader on Conservative Democrats, Corporate Power and the Middle East

RALPH NADER: Certainly the Democrats are not going to make it a major issue. Nancy Pelosi and others have been with the pro-Israeli lobby for years. Certainly Bush and Cheney aren’t. They don’t understand that the greatest move toward national security in our country and in the so-called effort against terrorism would be to solve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The majority of both people would like a two-state solution. There are extremists in Israel that would like to continue to dominate the West Bank and harass Gaza and block an exit of the people there for traveling and for export of goods. So it’s just — it’s now a steady state, destruction every day of innocent people, as you say, thirteen in one family. The Israeli military know how to pacify Gaza. They know they could take over that town, where these primitive rockets that are wildly inadequate are fired. But it serves the interest of certain political interests in Israel to continue this kind of conflict.
This is an eminently resolvable conflict. There’s a lot of former Israeli military and intelligence people who know how to do it, people in the Knesset who know what needs to be done. But as long as the US basically says to whoever is in charge, β€œYou can do whatever you want over there, and we’ll still pump $3 – $4 billion and cluster bomb weapons, etc.,” there’s not going to be a resolution. As long as there’s no resolution, there’s going to be an inflammation increasing all over the Islamic world, and our national security will be compromised.
This campaign, this election, Amy, was basically a mandate-less election for the Democrats. There was really no mandate other than against Bush and do something about Iraq. Domestically, virtually no mandate about rearranging of power, shifting it from corporations to workers, consumers, taxpayers, to communities.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Nov 9 2006 0:27 utc | 68

What’s all the talk about recounts? Could the machines be wrong????

Posted by: pb | Nov 9 2006 0:43 utc | 69

IMHO, the corruption was simply overwhelmed by voter turn-out. I think the draft-age voters swung it. It certainly wasn’t the Codgers who are generally intimidated by the new election technology.
How to get the youngsters to turn out in 2008 is a project to be worked on for the next two years. As well as instant-runoff voting, to make sure the corporate bastards and their Lackeys never get the upper hand ever again.
.02

Posted by: pb | Nov 9 2006 0:55 utc | 70

pb @ 70, speaking to your comment, it has been an interesting day for a 40 something working amongst 90 or so 20-30 year olds. the atmosphere in our office was jubilant today, and suddenly this morning i received a message from the newly created “dems” distribution which has quickly become the company forum for politics. while very few spoke aloud about the elections – nearly everything happens on line anyway – more than one person noted how it felt like a thursday or friday – people were that kind of upbeat. i should also share that the 36 year old ceo of this company is a staunch republican and i have only heard politics discussed in this open loft once or twice and only briefly. so if this is what the results of this election can bring about, my hope is that the dino dems will prove us wrong or that this group of young people will join in with us to demand better if they don’t deliver.
and while i know that he his not everyone’s favorite around here, i read this excerpt from ned lamont’s concession speech and thought it was worth sharing:

We didn’t win, but we made a difference; tomorrow we start again. Don’t stop now, we’re just beginning. It starts with one person standing up and speaking out, and then a lot of people, powered by grassroots and netroots and a passion to do better. That’s what I heard all over the state: we can do better.
The last week of the campaign was so heartening, traveling the state in a big old campaign bus stopping by hot dog stands and rallies and, finally, polling stations. The bus sang out a little Marley or U2 as we wheeled into some of the towns and folks responded with hi fives and big grins. Kids ran up and shouted, “And so do we!” They responded to a fun, positive message of hope and I loved the fact that we won the overwhelming majority of the votes in the mock school elections around the state. And then on election day, there you were, standing in the rain at the polling stations into the evening waiting for the last of the voters to straggle in.
We worked our hearts out; it’s ironic that our message of change did not carry the day in Connecticut but it helped spark a sea change in Congress. Let’s make sure they act boldly: bring our troops home from Iraq to the hero’s welcome they deserve, invest in our kids, invest in clean energy, universal healthcare, a government that respects for our constitution, our right to privacy, and shows respect for other nations and cultures. We will be a stronger and better nation for it.
Peace,
Ned

who knows – maybe it will provoke malooga enough to break his silence? πŸ˜‰

Posted by: conchita | Nov 9 2006 1:31 utc | 71

georgia10 at dkos has written a poignant diary, the newbie talking about what it is like to be young at this moment in time. her perspective is drastically different than many here, but it is worth considering:

I’m used to losing, and I’m used to consolation prizes rendered in the form of moral victories and close calls.
But this–victory–is entirely foreign to me.
It’s a strange feeling, one best described as a mix of ticklish heart and nervousness. I’ve moved on past disbelief to a sort of quiet contemplation on the length of the path before us. It’s a long road towards real change, and my feet at slightly hesitant as we begin the walk. Perhaps those who have experienced victory before are more surefooted, steadied by the memories of previous Democratic majorities. We’ve been here before.
But here is not the here of the past. The path to implementing our agenda is booby-trapped by a right-wing intent on minimizing our majority status, and the media of today is not the media of past Democratic majorities.
So pardon the anxiousness of young voter who, in this Majority, feels like a citizen in a strange land. This crown of laurels feels a bit awkward on a head which has hung so low for so long.
I’ve never had victory open the floodgates of hope. I’ve never seen the stars so bright and shiny, or the path towards real change so well-lit. It’s exhilarating. It’s intimidating. It’s brand new, and overdue.
To those celebrating their first victory today, and to those who have seen victory and taste it again tonight… congratulations. Our party has won, and our work has just begun.

she clearly believes she can shape the democratic party. i’m willing to give her and others like her a chance. in time she may realize that the latter half of her closing sentence is closer to reality, but who knows, maybe they will forge a new way.

Posted by: conchita | Nov 9 2006 3:25 utc | 72

Conchita :
I wonder of Georgia10 is ready to get in Rahm Emanuel’s face, or if Israel will become the Third Rail it’s always been for the Demoplicans. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. Up to their necks in evil.
I’ve not often been to Kos land. I’m told he forbade discussion of Israel at his Demoplican site?
Zionists left trail of destruction

“They committed a war crime in Beit Hanun,” he cries, his voice cracking, his hands gesticulating towards the Heavens.
A lone minaret that withstood Zionists’ bulldozer teeth and shell fire is all that remains of one of the oldest mosques in Gaza, the Nasser mosque.
Singed copies of the holy Koran were being gathered up by children.
“This mosque is more than 800 years old. It is part of our heritage and thousands of people visited it every year,” laments Akram Abdel Jawd Qassam, whose family have been caretakers of the holy site for half a century.
The Zionists “want to destroy everything. Even our heritage and our history. It’s a tragedy,” adds the old man.
They claimed “there were fighters in the mosque but they are liars. I have the keys and it was closed. They occupied my house for two days and never asked me to open the doors to show them that it was empty,” he said.

I’m afraid that they’re so pleased with their “victory” that it’s back to business as usual. And the killing business in Gaza is getting grimmer and grimmer every day.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Nov 9 2006 3:50 utc | 73

“crown of laurels”
hehe. well. sure, this moment isn’t throwing open the gate to the garden of love and peace. in a year’s time, the knuckleheads will recall the period befor nov. 7 with insipid nostalgia. as a friend of mine says, it will be for the knucklheads the era of golden possibilities ended by dem defeatism.
the war, the war, the war. what the fuck to do about the war? as someone here said at the beginning of this mess: no good for anybody.

Posted by: slothrop | Nov 9 2006 3:52 utc | 74

jfl, afaik there is no ban on israel diaries at dkos, but i am not a dkos expert – i just find some good there. i will say that i have seen many israel diaries there and generally they degenerate into a lot of name calling and other ugliness. chances are for that reason they are discouraged. the community is large and diverse and emotions there run just as high as anywhere else where middle east issues are discussed.
however, i will say, with the disclaimer that while i was not on the site all day and the volume of diaries on a daily basis is tremendous, i did not see any diaries about this most recent israeli travesty against the palestinians. that is not to say none were written. i don’t know. similarly, i did not see any diaries about health insurance or the environment. given the role that kossacks throughout the country played in many of these elections, the results were the primary topic.

Posted by: conchita | Nov 9 2006 4:31 utc | 75

Time for me to break out the bubbly.
Allen to concede in Va. Senate race.
At the very least I now have someone to complain to who might read or even understand the complaint.

Posted by: beq | Nov 9 2006 17:44 utc | 76

<http://www.prorev.com>Sam Smith, longtime Kremlinologist of the American persuasion — DCologist? comments that bipartisanship is alive and well in this sense at least:

IN KEEPING with the new spirit of bipartisanship, here – with links to more information – are some of the major issues that neither party addressed seriously during the campaign and for which neither party has a decent, coherent program:
CLIMATE CHANGE
SUSTAINABLE LIVING
RESTORING CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT
RESTORING CIVIL LIBERTIES
GETTING OUT OF IRAQ
ENDING HOSTILITIES AGAINST MUSLIM COUNTRIES
PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD
ENDING USE OF TORTURE
POPULATION GROWTH
ENDING THE WAR ON DRUGS
UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE
PUBLIC CAMPAIGN FINANCING
INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING

(emphasis mine)
And Bob Jensen echoes my own dour outlook:

As I stood in line for coffee on the morning after election night, a Democratic Party supporter ahead of me in line said, “Thank God this country is finally switching trains.”
If only that were true.
On Election Day 2006, the U.S. public didn”t switch trains but simply ratified a different group of conductors.
It”s the same old train, on the same tracks, heading in the same direction.
This isn”t an argument that there are never any meaningful differences between politicians; sometimes it does matter who is giving the orders on the train. But on this day after the morning-after, it”s crucial for those with a critical perspective to highlight that this train — contemporary U.S. society — is barreling forward toward disaster, no matter who”s punching tickets.
[…]
Many who would agree in some fashion with such an assessment will say, “Yes, but at least electing Democrats might slow down the train.” With a reactionary right-wing Republican Party in total control, the train is hurtling forward at 100 miles per hour, according to this position, but with Democrats in charge the train might slow down to 90 miles per hour.

agreed, 90 mph is an improvement over 100 mph but only in a theoretical kind of a way; a crash at 90mph is still going to be lethal.
Jensen concludes that the only viable strategy is to continue to mistrust the Democratic Party and work hard down at the grassroots:

The small amount of time we might gain will be meaningful only if we confront the harsh reality that the systems that shape our world — capitalism and empire, rooted in white supremacy and patriarchy — are fundamentally bankrupt and indefensible, yet deeply rooted in our culture.
When I make this point, I”m often told by liberals and progressives that I”m not being realistic, that ordinary people won”t listen to such analysis. That”s not my experience. When I have tried to articulate this worldview in plain language in recent political talks, I have found that a growing number of people not only will listen but are hungry for such honesty.
Of course not everyone agrees — not anywhere near the number needed for a mass movement right now, and certainly not a majority — but one wouldn”t expect that in this affluent society in which many people are still insulated from the consequences of these systems. But more and more people, from many sectors of society, are facing these realities, and we are searching for a community in which to confront this together.
Our political work should focus on connecting with people on common ground, and then working to shape a radically new vision of justice and sustainability…

only 40 percent of the US electorate turned out at thiw critical juncture…

Posted by: DeAnander | Nov 9 2006 20:45 utc | 77

oops. I proofread sloppily and lost the link to Sam Smith’s place for the quote above.

Posted by: DeAnander | Nov 9 2006 20:47 utc | 78

beq #76. unless i am mistaken the choice of who runs the senate is down to one man, lieberman

Posted by: annie | Nov 9 2006 20:58 utc | 79

I live in Virginia, and yes, I am celebrating Webb’s victory over Allen tonight.
I had, and still have, doubts about Webb…in the primaries in May I was wavering back and forth between him and the other candidate all the way to my polling place. But as Beq said in #76, at least I have someone now who might read and perhaps answer my letters. George Allen didn’t.
Someone noted above that even if the dems don’t get much good legislation passed, they can still be effective at thwarting some really bad republican bills. That is positive. (At work we call these “negative accomplishments.” πŸ™‚ )
And for me one of the first tests of where the 110th Congress might be headed will happen in the lame duck session of the 109th. Bush said one of his remaining priorities to squeeze out of this Congress before they adjourn and hand over power to the dems is a bill authorizing and legitimizing domestic wiretapping.
HELL NO! Dems need to oppose this in lockstep, even if the republicans still muster the votes to get it passed somehow. The single most important issue for me in this election was the erosion of constitutional rights and civil liberties. If they don’t stand up to this in the lame duck, I will be very pessimistic about what the 110th will accomplish.

Posted by: Maxcrat | Nov 10 2006 0:46 utc | 80

Oops. Make that, WARRENTLESS domestic wiretapping.

Posted by: Maxcrat | Nov 10 2006 0:48 utc | 81

“Bush said one of his remaining priorities to squeeze out of this Congress before they adjourn and hand over power to the dems is a bill authorizing and legitimizing domestic wiretapping.
Maybe Bush had better watch himself. The E word has been kept low profile since the election but if it were whispered about, it could have a ‘calming’ effect in his hubristic stance. Bullies usually don’t talk quite so big when they have lost their security blanket. Actually he has a right to remain silent between now and January because anything he does or says now can and will be used against him.

Posted by: pb | Nov 10 2006 6:47 utc | 82

That is the ‘I’ word as in impeachment, of course.

Posted by: pb | Nov 10 2006 6:57 utc | 83

Now that the American people have finally woken up, they will be royally pissed if it’s ‘business as usual’ in washington. Big change is expected and soon. Never mind the appeasement bullshit.

Posted by: pb | Nov 10 2006 7:10 utc | 84

‘if it’s business as usual’ in washington
not going to happen unless the usual is now total mayhem. the dems have two years to secure the WH. there is a strong likelihood that the disaster in iraq will erupt and become worse. palestine is unlikely to improve. iran could be a nightmare. i have suspicion the rethugs know this, am suspicious enough to think they are planning for it, as billmon eludes. the dems are not idiots, they will make their mark and it most likely will include some payback.

Posted by: annie | Nov 10 2006 7:23 utc | 85

told you so @#79
Lieberman won’t rule out GOP caucusing
Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut said yesterday that he will caucus with Senate Democrats in the new Congress, but he would not rule out switching to the Republican caucus if he starts to feel uncomfortable among Democrats.

Posted by: annie | Nov 14 2006 1:54 utc | 86

fishy

Posted by: annie | Nov 14 2006 2:37 utc | 87

Good one annie. Here is another fishy — this one would be funny if its implications weren’t so serious.

Posted by: Bea | Nov 14 2006 3:14 utc | 88

Oops that link didn’t work – just replicated annie’s. Sorry – try this one instead.

Posted by: Bea | Nov 14 2006 3:19 utc | 89

annie’s link to Rawstory shows that Lieberman’s Republican opponent in 2000 (Giordano) and his Democratic opponent in 2006 (Lamont) both received the exact same number of votes — 448,077!
What are the odds of that? I wondered if he had some way to mess with the numbers, but this result is a deliberate stick in the eye.

Posted by: jonku | Nov 14 2006 7:07 utc | 90