Just a guess from what I read:
- the House goes to the Democrats;
- the Senate keeps a Republican majority after Lieberman (Joe that is) switches party and with Cheney’s vote counted in;
- no change in any Bush/Cheney policy.
What’s your take?
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
November 5, 2006
Election Prediction
Just a guess from what I read:
What’s your take?
Comments
yep, w/diebold there’s no way the letting the senate go blue. Posted by: annie | Nov 5 2006 20:08 utc | 1 I think Dems will pick up 10 seats or fewer in the House. If they actually do get 30 or more I’ll be happily wrong – for about 10 minutes, after which time the ralization that not much will be different will set back in. Posted by: mats | Nov 6 2006 0:08 utc | 4 Pretty much agree with B’s take. But, the changeover in the House has the potential to be positive for our country and the issues that concern us most. It isn’t so much a party thing, per se, but the quality and character of some of the individuals that will become Committee Chairmen under the dems. John Conyers, Henry Waxman, possibly George Miller and John Dingell – these guys are tired of the bs, tired of the lack of accountability, sick at seeing the underpinnings of our country torn down. They could do a lot through hearings, subpoenas, shining the light all over the dark places that the republicans have been trying to keep under wraps. Plus whatever new vision, energy, and character may be brought in with a new wave of newly-elected progressives. Maybe it is not sufficient, certainly not nirvana, but I am somewhat optimistic about putting the brakes on the slide into authoritarianism with a dem takeover, in spite of the Dem Party’s institutional spinelessness. Posted by: maxcrat | Nov 6 2006 0:13 utc | 5 in spite of the Dem Party’s institutional spinelessness. Posted by: jony_b_cool | Nov 6 2006 1:49 utc | 6 b, Sounds about right. Posted by: small coke | Nov 6 2006 2:54 utc | 7 hey guys, Posted by: crone | Nov 6 2006 3:20 utc | 8 Two Words – C..H…A…O…S & C..O…R..R…U…P….T…I…O..N. Posted by: jj | Nov 6 2006 5:23 utc | 9 circus remedies: Posted by: catlady | Nov 6 2006 5:33 utc | 10 sounds good catlady… Posted by: Uncle $cam | Nov 6 2006 6:32 utc | 11 If you were giving odds, I’d bet on your take. And if it did start to look like the Republicans were to lose the Senate as well, I imagine they will start complaining of voter fraud and insisting on recounts and investigations to hamstring any chance of the new Congress being seated before 2008. Posted by: ralphieboy | Nov 6 2006 6:48 utc | 12 Appreciate the suggestions. Uncle, you might get lucky up there & get a blizzard – that’d be great for a walk in w/a warm drink… Posted by: jj | Nov 6 2006 6:50 utc | 13 Uncle $cam – thank you for the music link – … unusual listening for me. Posted by: Owl | Nov 6 2006 8:01 utc | 14 ok, i’m groovin now, maybe i’ll pore me another… Posted by: annie | Nov 6 2006 9:23 utc | 15 Computerised voting machines are a waste of money and energy. A useless intermediary. An improvement which is not one. Paper ballots, correspondence, provided the mail is reliable, and internet furnish all that is needed. Posted by: Noirette | Nov 6 2006 18:59 utc | 16 I ordered an absentee ballot because I was supposed to be working out of town tomorrow. I personally delivered it last Tuesday. That paper ballot looked good too. Posted by: beq | Nov 6 2006 19:14 utc | 17 I think you’ve got it exactly, b. Looks like the last two Senate races go Dem (MO 92%: D 963k, R 931k; MT 73%: D 147k, R 140k) making D 51 to R 49 BEFORE Joementum switches “for the good of the country” to give Cheney the tie-breaker. Still, a good night by my reckoning. Now I just want to see investigations, indictments, convictions and jail time meted out from now till 2008. Posted by: PeeDee | Nov 8 2006 8:00 utc | 18 |
||