Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
October 6, 2006
WB: Services Rendered +++

Billmon:

IV. Whopper

The man from Palm Beach was, to use the corporate parlance, a cash cow, in the sense that he consistently raised more money than he needed for his own races, and passed the surplus along to the party […].
Always the dollars. Always the fuckin’ dollars.

III. Always the Dollars

II. A Fresh Perpective

I. Services Rendered

Comments

Go Bernhard! (your English comprehension continues to improve)
🙂

Posted by: beq | Oct 6 2006 15:33 utc | 1

I’ll continue in the same vein.
“Do you think that Foley licks his fingers every time he turns a page?”

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Oct 6 2006 15:39 utc | 2

Cloned Poster, I’ll play along.
Q: What does Mark Foley use as a bookmark when he’s done reading?
A: Nothing. He likes his pages bent over.
mmack

Posted by: mmack | Oct 6 2006 15:44 utc | 3

It’s weird seeing jokes that I first heard when I came to Washington in 1983 repeated — word for word, except for the names — 23 years later.
Back then, Hustler magazine came up with a marketing slogan: “At least our pages are of legal ages.”

Posted by: billmon | Oct 6 2006 15:48 utc | 4

Well Billmon, I just changed the name on my joke from Dan Crane to Mark Foley.
Instead of “working blue”, we’re “working green” by recycling old jokes.
mmack

Posted by: mmack | Oct 6 2006 15:52 utc | 5

okay I’ll drag this one over from The Lavender Bund:
From the pedofoleya smorgasbord at AlterNet (by Rudy):
“Did you know that during the annual House Republican Caucus Orgy, they take an occasional break to make sure they are all on the same page…”

Posted by: beq | Oct 6 2006 15:57 utc | 6

Jay Leno: “The problem with Foley was not a little Jack Daniels, it was going after little Jacks and Daniels”

Posted by: b | Oct 6 2006 16:09 utc | 7

Really Bill?
“It’s weird seeing jokes that I first heard when I came to Washington in 1983 repeated — word for word, except for the names — 23 years later.”
Ask my Solami GF, my Polish plumber, my Filipino homecarer, my Irish builder, my Jewish optician, my Scotish pension advisor…………—– English Propaganda lasts, that is why it is so good.
These days they work on the Muslims.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Oct 6 2006 16:10 utc | 8

Oh sure, ethnic jokes are eternal — what’s Borat but one long, updated Pollack joke? The Romans told Greek jokes, the Greeks told Egyptian jokes, the Cro-Magnons probably told Neanderthal jokes. Politician jokes involving money and/or sex are nearly as immortal, but to see the exact same material repeated so precisely, well, it just goes to show that the House page program is basically like throwing little baby tuna fish into a shark tank.

Posted by: billmon | Oct 6 2006 16:17 utc | 9

Oh sure, ethnic jokes are eternal — what’s Borat but one long, updated Pollack joke? The Romans told Greek jokes, the Greeks told Egyptian jokes, the Cro-Magnons probably told Neanderthal jokes. Politician jokes involving money and/or sex are nearly as immortal, but to see the exact same material repeated so precisely, well, it just goes to show that the House page program is basically like throwing little baby tuna fish into a shark tank.

Posted by: billmon | Oct 6 2006 16:17 utc | 10

Sorry about that.

Posted by: billmon | Oct 6 2006 16:18 utc | 11

Boston Globe: Ethics panel to probe Foley

Posted by: b | Oct 6 2006 16:18 utc | 12

If this is all a political ploy, we ought to be careful not to be labeled “Gay Bashers”.
It would be interesting to know what ‘openly’ gay Dem. Representative Barney Frank thinks about all this.

Posted by: pb | Oct 6 2006 18:13 utc | 13

@pb – Barney Frank: Foley Scandal Makes GOP Tougher for Gays
Or short, it will create more “americablog”s.

Posted by: b | Oct 6 2006 18:53 utc | 14

Foley is not “gay.” He is a pederast. Small, important distinction.
Consenting adults is the touchstone here. Is that really so hard?

Posted by: Gaianne | Oct 6 2006 20:53 utc | 15

Foley is not “gay.” He is a pederast. Small, important distinction
He was both (although pederast may not be the right term, strictly speaking.) But being one has nothing to do with being the other. THAT’s the important distinction, and it’s not a small one.

Posted by: billmon | Oct 6 2006 21:22 utc | 16

Invariably, the cultural practice of an older man being the dominant partner of a younger boy mirrors the practice of an older man being the dominant husband of a younger woman.
this is no more a gay thing than a guy thing.
some women also.
many people lust youth, acting on it is another thing all together.

Posted by: annie | Oct 6 2006 21:39 utc | 17

Folio when bound can mean two pages or only one.
Taken in the sense of ‘book’ it refers to all the pages.

Posted by: Noirette | Oct 6 2006 22:14 utc | 18

Foley was a GOP connection to Scientology whose members pay about $1000 per hour for some grades of auditing. Political donation limits are pocket change for these folks and there are thousands of them.

Posted by: thetan | Oct 7 2006 1:37 utc | 19

Scientology services are tax deductible charitable contributions so Foley will probably use his campaign fund to get a super duper all inclusive rehab at the Fort Harrison in Clearwater, FL. It’s pretty easy to spend a couple of million dollars on advanced Scientology stuff and nowadays Foley has nothing better to focus on. It may be a life changing experience for him.

Posted by: thetan | Oct 7 2006 1:53 utc | 20

Jim Baker is a surburban working stiff. He still has to haul the garbage cans to the corner of the driveway once in a when the teen-age son (Bush) “forgets.” In Richard Ben Cramer’s book of the 1998 prez race Baker’s cursing because he’s dragooned into serving on Bush the older’s campaign from Sec State, a job with stature. You have to be Richard Rainwater (Rain Maker?) or the Bass’ to be able to do favors for the Bushes without being drafted. It’s the difference between being a millionaire and being super wealthy.

Posted by: christofay | Oct 7 2006 1:55 utc | 21

It must be hard for the IM saving Pages to see their dreams of extortable Foley campaign dollars go poof and be replaced with threats from the irate right wing.

Posted by: thetan | Oct 7 2006 2:04 utc | 22

Frankly I think the depravity these pages were exposed to by being so close to the center of the American political class far exceeds sexually explicit emails.
They have watched the mechanics of people beggaring the commonweal to enrich themselves, exploiting a mass murder to further the imperial designs of their masters, emending the extraordinarily well laid out organic laws of the nation in an effort to prolong their hold on power.
A few kinky emails is nothing to all of this.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Oct 7 2006 2:23 utc | 23

A few kinky emails is nothing to all of this.
i don’t know if i agree, mass muder can seem like an abstraction to a young mind. sex on the other hand, for a teenager can be all consuming. especially an unexperienced influential mind. especially one that has doubts about his/her sexuality, as many teens do.
you get to a kid’s sexuality early enough, you can fuck them up for quite a few years.

Posted by: annie | Oct 7 2006 2:50 utc | 24

what are the chances foley did more than email even just one of these kids? now what kid is going to come forward and admit he engaged in even lightweight sexual activity w/a 50 yr old congressman? especially a kid that wants a future in politics? also, a teenager w/limited experience w/alcohol might do something they regret.
most rape victims don’t report the crime. i’m not suggesting he raped anyone, but i am suggesting that many people in compromising positions do not come forward. a teen engaging in sexual contact w/foley would probably be compromised.
chances are this isn’t limited to only 5 or 6 kids. you think foley went from innocent to ‘measure it for me’ on some whim? there was probably a pattern of this activity for years and years, lots of people knew about it, and those kids were sitting ducks. every year a bunch of newbies. imagine if it was the gym coach at the local high school and you intercepted these messages on your sons computerand found out the principal and counselors knew for years. you’ld be suing the school district.
it’s the adults that have become so jaded they can’t think straight.

Posted by: annie | Oct 7 2006 3:09 utc | 25

Billmon has a Whopper

Posted by: b | Oct 7 2006 3:19 utc | 26

Staffer Cites Earlier Role by Hastert’s Office

House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert’s chief of staff confronted then-Rep. Mark Foley about his inappropriate social contact with male pages well before the speaker said aides in his office took any action, a current congressional staff member with personal knowledge of Foley and his behavior with pages said yesterday.
The staff member said Hastert’s chief of staff, Scott Palmer, met with the Florida Republican at the Capitol to discuss complaints about Foley’s behavior toward pages. The alleged meeting occurred long before Hastert says aides in his office dispatched Rep. John M. Shimkus (R-Ill.) and the clerk of the House in November 2005 to confront Foley about troubling e-mails he had sent to a Louisiana boy.

Posted by: b | Oct 7 2006 6:33 utc | 27

for the first time, I am starting to wonder whether politicians on the average have mal-adjusted attitudes towards sex. Not sure if its just this crop of guys in congress or politicians in general.
and not kidding, was also wondering who really needs supervision on sexual behavior more ? the pages or the pols.
seems a lot of politicians just seem to lack the ability to recognize the once-in-a-scandal moment when candor & honesty can make a difference. There are humaninizing as well as de-humanizing vibes to sex that they just do not seem to get like regular folks do.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Oct 7 2006 6:37 utc | 28

From the WaPo piece I just linked above (Palmer is Hastert’s chief od staff):

Palmer, who shares a townhouse with Hastert when they are in town, is more powerful than all but a few House members. Members know that he speaks for Hastert.

What else do Palmer/Hastert share?
Then this on the former house clerk, esp. the last para:

Trandahl’s departure came within days of his confrontation with Foley over e-mails that the congressman had sent a former page. House aides say the circumstances of Trandahl’s exit were oddly quiet. The departure of a staff member of long standing, especially one as important as the House clerk, is usually marked with considerable fanfare, said Scott Lilly, a former Democratic staff director of the House Appropriations Committee. Debate is suspended in mid-afternoon to accommodate a stream of testimonials from lawmakers.
Trandahl’s departure was marked by a one-minute salute from Shimkus and a brief insert into the Congressional Record.
“My one-hour Special Order changed to a five-minute Special Order, now to a one-minute,” Shimkus said. “I just want to say thank you for the work you have done.”
Lilly said: “He seemed to suddenly disappear in a puff of smoke.”
Trandahl, now the executive director of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, has not returned repeated phone calls and e-mails.
Congressional aides point to another factor that links Trandahl to the Foley matter. A member of the board of the national gay rights group Human Rights Campaign, Trandahl is openly homosexual and personally close to the now-disgraced former lawmaker, who announced through his lawyer this week that he is gay.

Page A01 – this thing has legs …

Posted by: b | Oct 7 2006 6:49 utc | 29

annie :
I didn’t mean that a few kinky emails are nothing.
But the perversions they’ve been trained to accept as “normal” by this experience completely overshadow the kinky email, or even the sexual liason, they may have suffered at the hands of the political class.
This is not to say that kinky emails exchanged and/or sexual liasons between the powerful and the relatively powerless are not wrong, but that the long terms effects of such mistreatment seem to me likely to be less seriously debilitating, not only to the individuals involved but to our entire society, than are the long term effects of schooling these youngsters in the “civiliized” lies, offhand funding of murder and brutality, theft and double-dealing that is the everyday behavior of our American political class.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | Oct 7 2006 6:51 utc | 30

But the perversions they’ve been trained to accept as “normal” by this experience completely overshadow the kinky email
yes, of course. all those civilized lies lead to our uncivilized reality.

Posted by: annie | Oct 7 2006 15:15 utc | 31

wayne madsen has some news/gossip ……

The rumors about another top GOP member of the House being involved in sexual encounters with young “men for hire” are confirmed to WMR by well-placed sources in Washington’s gay community. The member in question is House Speaker Dennis Hastert, whose “alternate” life style is the primary reason for him and his staff covering up the scandal involving ex-Florida GOP Rep. Mark Foley and his lewd messages sent to underage male congressional pages. Hastert’s penchant to receive anal sex is well-known to our sources in DC’s gay community. Additionally, Hastert’s reported extremely small penis is the subject of many jokes among Washington’s gay circles…
In July, Hastert was hospitalized at Bethesda Naval Hospital for cellulitis, a bacterial skin infection. In the Feb. 7, 2003 issue of AIDS Treatment News,..

fyi, i was following some gay/dc links the other day and ran into some old ones that mentioned the wrestling team rumor and also a current allegation abc was going to be looking at another member of congress..

Posted by: annie | Oct 7 2006 22:02 utc | 32

Here’s an alternative last line to the “Whopper” item. Foley is saying to Bush, “Yeah, that too, I guess, but what I REALLY meant was, I like ’em 18 YEARS OLD!

Posted by: imho | Oct 8 2006 20:56 utc | 33