Billmon:
As I recall, a few months back various lefty bloggers were debating the political impact of media consolidation, with the majority opinion seeming to be that it was no big deal.
Guess again.
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
September 8, 2006
WB: Pest Control
Billmon:
Comments
Just in case anybody is interested, there is a Canuckistani (non-consolidated/public broadcaster) alternative to the Prop-A-Gammon. I get it, you’re saying that Rush Limbaugh is the re-incarnation of Uncle Remus. Zipahdeduhdah – zippiteday – my oh my what a wonderful day. Posted by: anna missed | Sep 8 2006 7:39 utc | 2 If this works out well, maybe Disney will re-make Song of the South after all, guess who will play the leading role? Posted by: anna missed | Sep 8 2006 7:43 utc | 3
1) “Liberal media” Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 8 2006 9:30 utc | 4 Interestingly this same film is going to be broadcast on BBC2 in the UK on Sunday and Monday as part of the BBC’s extensive 9/11 5th anniversary programming – Channel 4 have also had a fair few items as well, including the fictional, and less than convincing, “Sleeper Cell” drama. Posted by: dan | Sep 8 2006 9:42 utc | 5 Looks like mark and krista got the fuck out of dodge before the lord struck em down…either that or they pulled their website, because they knew the hammer was going to drop. Anywho, I ripped their whole web addy, you know, for ‘da lord’. Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 8 2006 9:42 utc | 6 P.S., If-fin, da spirit moves ya, any financial contributions are tax deductible and should be addressed to: Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 8 2006 9:54 utc | 7 ABC/Disney and Scholastic, Inc. Solicits Teachers to Peddle Lies with “The Path to 9/11”
Posted by: beq | Sep 8 2006 11:12 utc | 8 YWAM! My God how this little youth group has changed since I hung around with them in the 1970’s! They certainly were not buying into the dominionist Xianity movement then and were much more dedicated to the field of real ministry: medical relief, charity, and helping poorer churches with their outreach to poor and those on drugs. But I have discovered that many of the institutions of my youth (and while I never joined YWAM I visited their Abdullam conference Center in New Hampshire several times and stayed a few days to talk with their leaders: back then Nick Savoka and Steven Martin)have turned into rovian propaganda factories. Still even then they were too radical for me: living in a closed community was too Moonie-like and restrictive. Leaders were very controlling. They seemed to have the vision of developing the uber-saint and that always made me uneasy. Posted by: Diogenes | Sep 8 2006 12:04 utc | 9 Reclaiming The Issues: Islamic Or Republican Fascism? Posted by: beq | Sep 8 2006 13:57 utc | 10 Speaking of faith-based initiatives: Does Disney actually believe that the kinder, gentler fascists being raised on high over church and state will NEVER forsake their enablers? Posted by: Anonymous | Sep 8 2006 15:12 utc | 11 bagdikian in his first ed. of media monopoly declared 50 corporations controlling the mediascape. this number hasn’t changed much. still, about 50 main players. and anyone reading benjamin compaign’s tirelessly edited who owns the media? walks away w/ the feeling that ownership is a poor map of the media wasteland.
this thesis has been worked over by many bright analysts, but my favorite is c. edwin baker’s timeless give the audience what it wants. Posted by: slothrop | Sep 8 2006 15:18 utc | 12 variety reports that ABC may decide not to air “the path to 911”. i’m at work and necessity demands that i steal richard cranium’s dkos diary almost entirely:
Posted by: conchita | Sep 8 2006 15:31 utc | 13 @ conchita – I was happy to see this morning that the link and email I sent out to friends yesterday has rippled like a pebble in a pool. Posted by: beq | Sep 8 2006 15:40 utc | 14 beq, thanks for the hartman link , it’s a keeper. Posted by: annie | Sep 8 2006 16:37 utc | 15 Kinda tough to feel sympathy for Clinton’s administration in all of this, although I’m sure the Reaganites’ arming of OBL and Company will not be covered. Nor will Iraqi sanctions, Israel/Palestinians issues. Posted by: biklett | Sep 8 2006 16:54 utc | 16 Anyone who gets their information or world view from any mainstream media deserves all the mis/disinformation they receive. Posted by: ralphieboy | Sep 8 2006 18:16 utc | 17 Anyone who gets their information or world view from any mainstream media deserves all the mis/disinformation they receive. Posted by: slothrop | Sep 8 2006 18:20 utc | 18 @ slothrop: What Right Wingers See When They Read the New Youk Times Posted by: beq | Sep 8 2006 19:03 utc | 19 But ralphie and sloth, the thing is….. all those ‘anybodys’ can be shucked and jived into voting against their own interests in the very same way. and those “anybodys” surround me, even in the supposedly sophisticated metropolis of new york. Posted by: conchita | Sep 8 2006 21:10 utc | 22 But beq, the first one sounded right…lol Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 8 2006 21:11 utc | 23 Path To 9/11 update! Google caught the missing Mark and Krista Web Link!
Our Permanent Address remains: Now will some one tell me how making a film that expresses historical lies and deceptions rates about a political party in an election year rates being TAX DEDUCTABLE AS A RELIGIOUS CHARITY??? Sorry folks. Little alarm bells are ringing. Is this a Bush faith based initiative? Furthermore, it seems Bush plans on interrupting on day of the showing with a 20 minute “Get Tough on Terror” Speech! Is anyone regulating this group and its campaigning under the guise of a tax exempt church??? Hello. Washington! Is anyone home? Posted by: Diogenes | Sep 9 2006 13:31 utc | 25 Diogenes, I hope this is getting back to abc et al. There needs to be a lot of NOISE. Posted by: beq | Sep 9 2006 13:43 utc | 26 Now will some one tell me how making a film that expresses historical lies and deceptions rates about a political party in an election year rates being TAX DEDUCTABLE AS A RELIGIOUS CHARITY??? Posted by: annie | Sep 9 2006 18:16 utc | 27 The YWAM connection is just too much. Hiding behind a religious charity to make a propaganda movie is part of the “too much to believe” factor that keeps the Rove machine from justice. It is so absurd that when it becomes public, no one believes it. It reminds me of the national yawn that followed when Bush’s close relationship to cult leader Sun Myung Moon became public or when Gorenfield broke thet story of Moon having himself crowned “King of the United States” in the Dirksen Senate Offices. Its as though there is a inverse relationship between the size of the scandal and the amount of public reaction. It came our recently that no less than a dozen journalist were paid to right anti-Castro articles by the Bush administration. No one cares. And that is frightening. Posted by: Diogenes | Sep 10 2006 0:17 utc | 28 Everyone who sees it cares, but it seems that their hypocrisy, corruption, and cronyism, knows no bounds. Posted by: Doc | Sep 10 2006 0:35 utc | 29 Maybe the seige and plundering of Iraq ‘is’ about ‘oil’ to the Neo-fascists but for the Psycho-in-Chief it’s strictly a Religious war. Posted by: pb | Sep 10 2006 1:53 utc | 30 beq, Posted by: A swedish kind of death | Sep 10 2006 9:25 utc | 31 debating the political impact of media consolidation, with the majority opinion seeming to be that it was no big deal. Posted by: Gaianne | Sep 12 2006 20:19 utc | 32 |
||