Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 11, 2006
WB: Dog Bites Man

Billmon:

[I]t’s getting hard to see how an economic and/or foreign policy train wreck can be avoided, one that will eventually force large numbers of voters to fundamentally reassess their existing political loyalties.

Until it happens, though, it’s probably best if the corporate dreamweavers and the Rovian propaganda technicians keep their bosses in the power. I still believe (call it an article of faith) that a majority of the voters will eventually figure out they’ve been had — sold not just a bill of goods but a counterfeit reality, one that is crumbling in front of their eyes. When that happens, they’re going to be enraged, in a way that makes this year’s discontent look like the passing tantrum of a grumpy two-year old.

Dog Bites Man

Comments

For my money, Billmon is the only (major) blogger who gets it.
In fact it barely matters who wins in November. At this point, the shitstorm is coming, whoever is in charge.
After that, I have no idea what will happen.

Posted by: Lupin | Sep 11 2006 6:22 utc | 1

Hallelujah. Distilled truth is a beautiful thing to behold.

Posted by: m | Sep 11 2006 7:38 utc | 2

As for perceptional management goes, the disney version (yeah I watched some of it) on the tube was pretty indicitive, and what was suprising to me was not so much the historical fiction itself, but rather the manner in which it was portrayed. And as the the jist of Billmons piece, and the KOS link;
Understand that you are dealing with a target audience that doesn’t care enough, or simply refuses to devote the time to learn the real facts regarding the real issues. Instead, their perception has BECOME the facts! . . .
would indicate — an accurate documentary, let alone a truely historical accounting, would be of no interest — at all — either to ABC, Disney, or any demographic of couch potato that might watch it (in that version). So what we get here is a kind of part “Syrianaized” political commercial, and part music video, that plays very loose with the story line facts and very heavy with polemical juxtapositions that paint the Clinton gang, and Democrats in general as indecisive and weak on defense. Dollars to donuts, 90% of americans after watching this remain totally clueless to both the sequence of events and the myriad characters (with funny names) involved. But conversly, what is most likely absorbed, and remembered (and no doubt the mission of the film) is how the facts are transformed into mere armitures upon which is slathered a more (important) subliminal message within the normalizatized culture of violence and war. This is nothing less than a Tarantino-ized infomercial for the right (and why they like this so much), utilizing all manner of frameing, lighting, time pacing (endless & hypnotic 1 sec. succesive), and juxtaposition that all act to build up an impressionistic imprint that both iconify the difference between us and them — but more importantly — the crucial difference between us and us. In that the central theme of the piece develops as our intractable inability and failure to meet the threat on equally violent terms. And here they have tapped into the mainline fantasy lode that underlies so much american pop culture, the adoration of outlaws, mafiaosos, rambos, ninjas, and the like — individuals who step outside the law and create their own reality. Its no accident that Bush himself has tried to personify this image and make this the issue of his governance, so I guess Disney has stepped up to reverberate the message — and to become in effect, Bushes own private Leni Riefenstahl — with a hell of alot more money.

Posted by: anna missed | Sep 11 2006 8:32 utc | 3

Possession perception, is nine-tenths of the law, and as my fav writer –besides billmon–, says,”reality is what you can get away with.” There are rarely truer words, I mean, damn, look what American reality has become. A phrat boys dream party, ‘America gone wild.’ Booze and wet teeshirts hookers for everyone, whose in the club that is…Nevermind that your reckless behavior kills someone on a drunken night , it’s party party party, for those in the club. Just a mere microcosm of a paralax view, but true in my world. There are many thruths, and this is one of them, GW and his gang have turned American into an “animal house’with out the sophmorish humor. Indeed, party till you puke, then party some more…Let em eat cake, my beautiful mind…they co-oped Mardi Gras and moved it to the beltway.
It’s one big outrageous party for those in the club. So what if some useless eaters die, Oh, and btw, your not in the club.
American is the land of opportunities, if your in the billion dollars boys club we make the rules, aint America great! Home of the fee, land of the crave…
I suspect, but have no proof, that Jim VandeHei and Chris Cillizza article in warpost, is more half truth and propgagenda than anything else, yeah, what they leave out, after the propgagenda of “The National Republican Congressional Committee, which this year dispatched a half-dozen operatives to comb through tax, court and other records looking for damaging information on Democratic candidates…”, is that the whole wiretap/surveillance gig, is one big snoop fest on anyone especially democrats whom might intrude on the Dionysius party. The hazing of America. wall street is nothing more than the elegantly dressed hooker to corporate America’s stiff prick…
You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month.” – CIA operative discussing with Philip Graham, editor Washington Post, on the availability and prices of journalists willing to peddle CIA propaganda and cover stories, professional fucking liars…
And the hazing will continue until morale improves…
I was always astonished at the extraordinary good nature and lack of malice with which men who had been flogged spoke of their beatings and of those who had inflicted them…“-Dostoevsky

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 11 2006 9:06 utc | 4

The above should have read, “…one big snoop and blackmail fest on anyone, especially democrats, whom might intrude on their cupidinous Dionysius party.”
Party for the weekend yall…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 11 2006 9:16 utc | 5

All partisan activity is professional wrestling, paid distractions, else we would have paper ballot voting and Greenpeace, Sierra Club, Kucinich, Nader, etc. would have been talking about this:
When titanic glaciers melt or slide from land to sea,
the earth flexes from the weight now dispersed.
Earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic eruptions result.
This has happened several times for very long periods.
This is decades old information but is not mentioned
in Inconvenient Truth nor stressed by Greenpeace,
Sierra Club, etc. (Nevertheless everyone should see
the movie, and free online sounds inarguable if
leaders’ motives were clean. In addition, Soros or
such should book theaters and pay people $1 to see it,
with the theater owner making his money on popcorn as
usual and a donation box to keep the showings going.)
For prehistory repeating itself, see
<http://tinyurl.com/s3deh>
or google:
“Greenland’s Ice Sheet Is Slip-Sliding Away ”
(LA Times 6/25/06).
Note seismic activity at end and idea
of Greenland possibly being 3 islands under the weight of the 2
miles thick ice , so basin shaped interior is 1000′ below
sea level (from other source). No discussion of the
sea water thus running under and up into the glaciers
providing excellent unseen exits for the fresh water flowing from above, but it does have this:
“To her surprise, she detected a maze of tunnels, natural pipes and cracks beneath the unblemished surface.
“I have never seen anything like it, except in an area where people have been drilling bore holes,” Catania said.
No one knows how much of the ice sheet is affected.”
So, it’s like swiss cheese below, unblemished above. Thus those holes will never refill and every melting season, which last year included December, they’ll enlarge. Sounds susceptible to earthquake damage, thus causing further earthquakes and more ice slides.
A week later appeared
“Climate Change Could Cause Earthquakes and Volcanic
Eruptions, Scientists Say” (Ottawa Citizen 7/3/06).
(”Could” as in “Gravity could cause unsupported
objects to fall.”  
<http://tinyurl.com/m696x>
Neither article has any discussion of possible
effects of earthquakes on glaciers sliding, thus
ignoring the inevitable sequence: less weight triggers
earthquake, quake causes slide, repeat until arctics
are capless.
“Greenland’s Ice Cap Is Melting at a Frighteningly
Fast Rate” (S.F. Chronicle 8/11/06) says said ice is 3 miles thick, and also that it’s melting thrice as fast as 5 years gone (LA Times 6/25 said twice)
Also see “Glaciers Are Flowing Faster” Nature
9/23/04,  “A Bit of Icy Antarctica Is Sliding Toward
the Sea” Science 9/24/04, “Dramatic Change in West
Antarctic Sea Ice Could Produce 16ft Rise in Sea
Levels” Independent/UK 2/2/05.
Remember the Dubai ports deal in spring? Those buyers
are screwed. The sellers, owners of The Penninsular
and Oriental Steam Navigation Company, are orgasmic.
Note that in the 6th century Justinian’s great
historian, Procopius, wrote of yellow dust in the sky
that gendered famines, plagues and decisive wars.
Lesser European and Chinese, Japanese and Mayan
sources concur. The post Arthurian Wasteland is a hint
of this, but otherwise we’ve forgotten that climate
changes have serious consequences. (Keys, Catastrophe,
o.p. but available digitally via Amazon for $9.95, and
searchable free for key words like Procopius, plague,
slavery and famine to find a couple of pages at a
time.).
Note that cavalry men ordered cavalry charges against
well emplaced machine guns 1914-1918, and in 1926
Brit. Field marshall Haig wrote “aeroplanes and tanks
are only accessories to the man and the horse, and I
feel sure that as time goes on you will find just as
much use for the horse – the well-bred horse – as you
have ever done in the past.” (Social History of the
Machine Gun)
For our leaders’ sensible attitude, google plushtown gulf stream
<http://tinyurl.com/jv9am>

Posted by: plushtown | Sep 11 2006 10:38 utc | 6

I have sd before, I think what we are in the middle of, and above all else, in the mist of a grand ideological paradigm war. A battle for reality. A battle of arbitary and political subdivisions as if they were natural facts, ancient and inviolable, as if we were end products in evolution. Possibly, because we are conditioned to be; told all our lives that knowledge is power, (Bacon) that objects are best understood by breaking them into compartmentalized parts (Descartes) –which is the classic ‘need to know basis’ military hierarchy grup-think*–and that the interactions between objects can best be understood mechanistically (Newton, Galileo) and these accomplishments have served us, to a point. These are root assumptions. And living metaphors. But they have out lived their usefulness. It is time past time to move on, to grow. We are stagnating. Those committed to the Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm enjoy substantial power. In the scientific arena, for example , they still control the purse strings for awarding research grants and for major government ans private foundations. However, they are not the be all/end all. The Continuum Movement wants to be free; must be free. Systems holism has given birth, yet those whom benefit from non change want to starve the birth.
We outside the box thinkers, progress by embracing a systems holism we are non monolithic and a cultural pluralism tribe. The neocons and their ilk would stamp that out. Figuratively and quite literally, I suspect.
May God us keep From single vision and Newton’s sleep! ~Blake

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 11 2006 11:54 utc | 7

We see a pervasive mindset of control and domination permeating our cultural institutions, a mindset driven by the fear of anarchy. If someone—some authority or power over us—doesn’t control us, society will fall into chaos, or so we’re to believe.
But who controls the controllers? What kind of order do those in positions of power have in mind? Is power-over an order that works—i.e., that creates social harmony and makes us happy? Or does it create wars, blind obedience, inner deadness, Littleton, Colorado nightmares, injustices, epidemic substance and process addictions, economic exploitation, cynicism, chronic stress, and unhappiness?
It doesn’t make sense, for example, that we control children morning to night with rewards and punishments and then wonder why they grow up selfish manipulators: “What’s in it for me?” or “Just don’t get caught!” That’s how child-rearing and schooling methods trained all of us to think. And if people grow up obsessed with gaining power over others—the chance to be in the one-up position and to control who’s rewarded and who’s punished—where’s the surprise? This is the logical extension of our cultural paradigm.
In other words, is our culture built on a paradigm that’s working for us as well as we need it to? Is our consensus philosophy shaping our institutions to serve us, or are we becoming servants to systems that warp our minds, consume our energies, and turn us into people we never wanted to be? When more and more of us find ourselves asking such core questions, it’s time to start rethinking things from the ground up. It’s time to reclaim our powers.

On The Reality of the “Paradigm Conspiracy”
Now be honest, how many here read the title of the above link and had an immediant knee-jerk responce to the title, and word ‘Conspiracy’ and further, didn’t bother to read the data/info? And if you did, what does that tell you about social conditioning?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 11 2006 12:27 utc | 8

the rovians don’t actually need to win more votes for republicans, they just need to create such an uproar, and media blitz so that when they fix the election results the populace will believe it is plausible they actually did win.
perception is reality

Posted by: annie | Sep 11 2006 12:30 utc | 9

The Bismark is pefect. It was a huge powerful ship, but already obselete. It sailed out into the Atlantic to pummel the UK bound convoys. The Royal Navy mustered everythiing they had to chase it down. The Bismark sank the HMS Hood with one salvo (literally blowing it out of the water). In the end – reality prevailed – a little biplane doomed the Bismark with a small torpedo that struck the rudder. Once struck the ship ran in circles and the weaker ships of the Royal navy just picked it apart one shot at a time. Lets hope the Rove’s rudder gets hit in October and they start going in circles.

Posted by: DC | Sep 11 2006 12:34 utc | 10

annie dear, turn that around, ‘reality is perception’, hows that fit?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 11 2006 12:35 utc | 11

I disagree with Billmon’s wish for the Republicans to win this election, to ensure that the easily-manipulated masses will blame them when the Catastrophe finally happens.
2 reasons:
1) The Catastrophe is not going to be evidence enough for some sizable fraction of the population, who will continue to see the world through the ideological lenses they already have, rather than getting new ones. On the other hand, those who have a chance of seeing are already beginning to wise up.
2) I fear that as long as the Cheney Administration retains control of all the levers of official power, they will continue to make things worse, to the point where it may no longer be possible to have an election-based change of government (if we have not already reached that point.)

Posted by: mistah charley | Sep 11 2006 12:35 utc | 12

plushtown, could you be so kind as to provide links so we don’t have to go on fishing expeditions. i tried googling your suggestion last time and it wasn’t altogether clear where you were directing the reader.
thnx

Posted by: annie | Sep 11 2006 13:01 utc | 13

When that happens, they’re going to be enraged, in a way that makes this year’s discontent look like the passing tantrum of a grumpy two-year old.
when the political control paradigm trance breaks?
from uncle’s link the wall symbolized a political control paradigm trance for almost 50 years, Once the control paradigm trance broke, the wall came down almost overnight. 

Posted by: annie | Sep 11 2006 13:08 utc | 14

turn that around, ‘reality is perception’, hows that fit?
right now i can’t tell the difference, maybe it’s because i’m drinking green tea instead of coffee this morning….

Posted by: annie | Sep 11 2006 13:13 utc | 15

U$cam I read the data @8, well most of it, and I haven’t the faintest idea what kind of message society was trying to send me when my tickletackle was clipped from my talleywhack at birth due to some paradigm.
And with no common means to verify and test the outlandish claims of some, well we’re left with faith and belief which require no thought, just acceptance.
Seen the ads for HEADON – JUST APPLY IT TO YOUR FOREHEAD? This “medicine” is homeopathic based and contains 1 part in 1,000,000,000 of active ingredient. Those that hand the $8 bucks or so to the charlatans that produce this are rubbing nothing more than wax on their heads. There are a couple of variations of this product now for arthritis and muscle pain and these do have more active ingredient, like camphor. Just enough to give the waxy substance a medicinal smell, no more.
I’ll keep my supposed paradigm and my $8 thanks.

Posted by: gmac | Sep 11 2006 13:17 utc | 16

What if there is no going back?

Posted by: DM | Sep 11 2006 13:21 utc | 17

Part of our paradigm is that we ignore earthshaking and sea level information (post 6), ignore physics,history and prehistory, to savor real theories and fake battles. google plushtown Nuremberg

Posted by: plushtown | Sep 11 2006 13:26 utc | 18

This can be a very interesting thread if we pursue things for a while and endeavor to perservere.
@plushtown:
I have a few nits to pick with your first post.
1. As an historian, I have a bit of a problem with a social history of inanimate objects. I googled social histories of meat grinders, refrigerators, and other useful tools, and didn’t turn up much.
2. BTW, FM Haig believed in the supremacy of cavalry to the end of his days. Doubt that Haig ever thought about social history or machine guns much. Some people are incapable of learning anything. Didn’t have nits either, as he never got that close to the trenches.

Posted by: M.I. Rostovtsev | Sep 11 2006 14:45 utc | 19

“You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month.” – CIA operative discussing with Philip Graham, editor Washington Post, on the availability and prices of journalists willing to peddle CIA propaganda and cover stories.
I can justify that economically using either a marginal utility or a labor theory of value. Journalists are a dime a dozen. But a good call girl is hard to find.

Posted by: billmon | Sep 11 2006 14:52 utc | 20

oh no, something is very strange. i just made that comment (#13) about #18 and it somehow jumped the thread. i must be going nuts.off the computer for me for awhile…

Posted by: annie | Sep 11 2006 14:52 utc | 21

see you managed to survive june 06, plushtown. whew.
re billmon’s piece, i’d make the case that the rovian tactics are not just aimed at influencing the perceptions of the crowd, but, equally important, ratcheting up pressure on the cowed – that is, any potential political challengers will think twice about taking on the syndicate when such behavior will almost certainly result in public assassination. the voters themselves are primarily insignificant in determining the outcomes, though it does help to occassionally remind them why they should stay tuned out & apathetic.

Posted by: b real | Sep 11 2006 15:03 utc | 22

I am/we are the midwife — sitting through a long hard labor. There is no going back from the fact that the outcome will be painful, perhaps bloody. My hope is that what is delivered at some point at the end of this process, actually is a new life for our nation. I know that a stillbirth can also result. No going back though — just the waiting and attending through the screams and agony of our nation’s toil…

Posted by: Elie | Sep 11 2006 15:13 utc | 23

Sorry to be priggish, and it is of little importance, but it will help
our credibility if we spell Bismarck correctly.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Sep 11 2006 15:14 utc | 24

very bold entry. optimistic. the whole project of reconciling american “values” w/ reality is failing. we’ll soon see how obvious this failure is to the voters.
antonio negri:

Since discrepancies between the project and the reality are no longer possible, capitalism itself is impossible. If capitalism can exist only as reformism, then, when reformism is shown to be impossible, so is capitalism, and nothing remains but impotent desire and empty nostalgia. Nostalgia for paganism died along with Julian the Apostate.
The twentieth century represents the explosion of a reformist project on the part of capital. It was to have given form to the whole of the twentieth century; but the century slipped from its grasp. Everything coming before this experiment should be thought of as still belonging to the nineteenth century; what comes after is something extraordinarily new: the twenty-first century, perhaps? We shall see. For the moment it is enough to say that, located in the thirties and sixties, capital’s reformist phase was an experience which was simultaneously enthusing and ephemeral. Thus, returning to our collective biography, it is only right to acknowledge that we ourselves had found cause for optimism in that fragility, for example through the idea of pushing reformism forward, of shattering its limits, and of marrying capitalist reformism with socialism etc. But now what is to be said? What is to be done? The reformist giant had feet of clay. It was an illusion. We had believed it possible to build our transformative power from within the processes of capitalist transformation – and in this respect our destructive intentions were themselves adapted to reformist aims. Anti-fascism, the determination of consumption by the unsatisfied pressure of needs, exploitation of the wages question: what else was all this if not a waltz with the authors of reformism? Keynes and Roosevelt were the flags we carried within the workers’ movement, not to speak of Kennedy. Without confusing the cards on the table, yet incapable of discriminating correctly- i.e. of precisely identifying those material, constitutional and structural determining factors that render the limits of capitalism insuperable, or better, intraversable, or impassable – we were engaged in a class struggle to the rhythm of the Beatles. To go beyond this is to choose to construct something different.
It is precisely at its limits – i.e. in its twentieth-century-reformist guise – that capitalism is revealed, in a flash, as being impossible.
[68]
We are at last approaching a definition: the twentieth century is impossible capitalism. `What has reformism been?’ Answer: `A handful of decades, distributed here and there on the face of our planet, and including Europe, America, Japan, chez nous and “down under”‘. The twentieth century is impossible reformism – that is, the impossibility of the only form of possible capitalism. Reformism has been the only possible response to the October Revolution and to the nineteenth century which was responsible for the results of this ideology. But since reformism is impossible, there has, in fact, been no response to the October Revolution. The twentieth century has existed only insofar as it has produced an impossible dream. Therefore, caught by this impossibility and suffocated by it, it itself is impossible. The twentieth century exists as much as reformism exists: it is merely a thunderbolt, a brief flash of lightning (though a very bright one), or a brief period of light during the night. The Politics of Subversion, 64-65

Posted by: slothrop | Sep 11 2006 15:52 utc | 25

When I put on links (tinyurls)they don’t appear in post. Use own judgement, it’s good for you. Obviously I was wrong about June 6th (or Julian calendar version June 19th) being chosen date, but how about an argument as to why ice won’t slide when earth quakes, or that FEMA has you in good hands?

Posted by: Anonymous | Sep 11 2006 15:54 utc | 26

The plurality/majority may have soured on internationalism, but I seriously doubt they’re ready to accept the kind of social and economic changes an authentically anti-imperialist foreign policy would require.
Just out of curiosity, what kind of social and economic changes are you talking about here? I’m guessing energy independence/less-dependence is a given, also higher national savings rate and less debt held by foreign nations. What else?

Posted by: Vespasian | Sep 11 2006 15:59 utc | 27

Sorry, bad with computers and keyboards. Google {article title} means find a cached version (in each case near the top). Google Denver airport – look for something interesting near the top. Google
plushtown bones means look for cartoon, also near the top, but sometimes same recommendation on other blog shows up. If you think I’m wrong about inevitabilities you might find more evidence there.

Posted by: plushtown | Sep 11 2006 16:07 utc | 28

Good Lord, annie, Skynet (Skynet?) is activating! Soon we’ll be seeing Arnold Schwarzeneggers endlessly reproduced and omnipresent, hunting down as-yet-unpolitical women…
say, is it 2004 again?

Posted by: citizen | Sep 11 2006 16:12 utc | 29

re # 19: Social History of the Machine Gun is a title, not a meat grinder, John Ellis is the author. Whatever Haig’s opinions, horse and men were sent to die for 5 years straight because they were loved so much it was believed they’d triumph over the dirty machine, fatal to Hottentots but not us.
As an historian, notice that Gibbon and others who read all of Procopius, parts repeatedly, don’t discuss the “sun like the moon and the moon nearly gone”.

Posted by: plushtown | Sep 11 2006 16:18 utc | 30

If perception really is everything, and managing mass perceptions is the be-all and end-all of the political process, then Spengler was right — what we call “democracy” is really just a disguise for plutocracy.

If you look at democracy, apart from a few rare and by nature small exceptions like historic nation states, democracy has always been indirect, as in we elect representatives who take care of the decision making for us, who pull the strings on our behalf. It is a system in which a minuscule section of the population in reality ‘wear the pants’ and the crowd’s input is restricted to choosing every 4 or so years a few representatives from parties which actually are run by two rival elites.
Democracy, as synonym to “rule by the people”, always meant “rule by the rich people”, or at least rich enough to get themselves elected, meaning being able to take ample time off from paid work to campaign and to bankroll such a campaign for months on end. On top of that, you have to be either willingly gullible or power hungry enough to join a major party and toe the line till it’s your turn to lead the mob. Democracy, same dog, different head. I can’t remember who said it, but it’s so true: People who manage to get themselves elected to be President, should under no circumstance be allowed to do the job.
Democracy is a system which allows the loaded to mega rich people in societies to remain in control, whilst giving the worker bees the impression that they are actually in power. To manage staying in control all you have to do is understand gulasch communism, give the masses enough to eat (or in our case big screen TV’s), and they’ll keep quiet. Give them the slow motion picture of a belief that they too can become mega rich in this arrangement called democracy, whilst in real time you sell them a mortgage and thus making sure that no-one is going to rattle the cage, don’t want those interest rates on home loans going up, do we? “Bread and Games” in Roman times, “Credit cards and consumerism” in modern times.
Every few years we are then being asked which set of lies we would like to believe, make our tick in the (ir)relevant box and go back to our grindstones. For those of us who are not content with what we have, the men behind the curtain, the Wizards of Uz, have a special treat in store. They call it “Current Affairs program”, available on enough channels for the tin man, the lion and scarecrow not to hear about them. You see, there are three main hooks on which the whole democracy propaganda is based. Firstly, people need to believe that everyone can make it to the top in a democratic system, best done by showing/selling them the rare rags to riches story as being the rule rather than the exception that confirms the rule that this is a pipe dream.
Secondly, give the horde the idea that nobody is above the law, that the law is not made by the rich to protect the rich. This illusion is best created by every now and then hanging one of your rich fellow rulers out to dry. Mainly people who don’t really play a key role and who were simply dumb enough to be caught out.
And thirdly, the strongest hook of them all, make the citizens feel that all other forms of political structures will end in chaos and blood on the streets. This can be achieved by showing the plebs how bad things are in countries where there is no democratically elected government in place.
Put those three themes in little 10 minute segments, mixed with 90 second advertising spots to appeal to the watching consumer, and hey presto, here is your current affairs program, a full 60 Minutes of it. Quickly followed by a Fraser or ER, keep that reality coming.
So, I am sorry to say, but I have to concur with Spengler, democracy always was a cover for plutocracy, a form of building a government in which the wealthy run the show. Or, as George Bernard Shaw said, “Democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few.”
If in a country like the US with close to 250 million people first the father and later his son are at the helm of the country, or first the husband, and a few years later his wife, then I am more reminded of a monarchy than a democracy. See also: 27 of the 43 Presidents are cousins to the seventh degree at most.
As a remedy, hmm, I would suggest the following improvements:
A, The Peoples Representatives are not elected but randomly drawn from the population for a relatively short period of time, similar to jury duty.
B, Compulsive referenda for all issues involving sending troops abroad or other matters of grave importance
Democracy needs to be more direct, no campaign financing greater than, say $100 per person or business, AND no parties allowed, every vote a conscience vote.

…wall street is nothing more than the elegantly dressed hooker to corporate America’s stiff prick…

Too funny….

Posted by: Feelgood | Sep 11 2006 16:24 utc | 31

firedoglake discusses a book on fear, or fearlessness, which could be a very important theme for us.

Posted by: citizen | Sep 11 2006 19:18 utc | 32

Maybe an odd segue, but shades of self-transcendance, altered states, Huxley’s Doors of Perception — these billmon essays doses of a pain-salving, vision-enhancing psychotropic — and this one, in particular, some really good shit!
“Give[s] me hope, help[s] me cope, with this heavy load . . .”
Dance!, Nataraj!, dance!

Posted by: manonfyre | Sep 11 2006 19:30 utc | 33

Athenian democracy wasn’t rule by those rich enough to be elected, because most officials were chosen not by election but by lot. So, to a much greater extent than our system, it amounted to rule by average citizens.

Posted by: lysias | Sep 11 2006 21:22 utc | 34

@Lysias:
How would you compare the relative eduactional levels of current Americans and 5th century BC Athenians?
Seriously doubt if 50% of adult Americans could locate locate Greece on a map without any coaching.

Posted by: M.I. Rostovtsev | Sep 11 2006 21:38 utc | 35

But it’s getting hard to see how an economic and/or foreign policy train wreck can be avoided, one that will eventually force large numbers of voters to fundamentally reassess their existing political loyalties.
And if we look a little deeper, the voters political loyaltiies tend quite often to go with the party or candidate who caters to some set of latent inner beliefs. Both parties do it, but the Repubs are far better at the game.
As for reality vs. perception, the results of the Pew poll supports the view that the public is more hip to the oil factor as regards Iraq than it gets credit for. And one might ask, is it plausible that the public would tolerate sacrificing even a fraction of all this blood and treasure to bring “democracy” to no-oil Bangladesh ?
A win for the Dems is less like a band-aid that reverses bleeding and infection than its like being put on a lower dose of some medication nevertheless with same serious side-effects.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Sep 11 2006 21:41 utc | 36

@gmac
wtf? what are you talking about? Are you judging the work by the website it’s on? Did you even read it?
Why do people automatically throw the baby out w/the bath water so often? The work has merits above and outside the place hosted, I would suggest one be a bit more less cynical and look for what you can use. All else is signal noise, and a waste of time, energy and effort.
Had you read the text, their is much there to think about.
Whats this have to do w/having your pee pee clipped or homeopath anything?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 11 2006 22:30 utc | 37

Journalists are a dime a dozen. But a good call girl is hard to find.
Being that you are an ostensibly happy family man, I will refrain from asking for even the profferal of anecdotal evidence in support of your assertion. Hence, I will accept the claim prima facie — and with great sadness, I may add.

Posted by: Anonymous | Sep 11 2006 22:50 utc | 38

Oh, I don’t know, anon #38 truth be known, we’re all call girls (victims/perpetrators)to some extent…
geez, can’t you read tongue-in-cheek?
No need to feel ‘patronizingly’ sad for our billmon…
Save your sad flippant feelings for the poor selectively blind cheerleaders of the beltway.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 11 2006 23:08 utc | 39

be careful what you wish for because a good trick is hard to find too.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Sep 12 2006 3:36 utc | 40

Jony you be really cool.

Posted by: Curmugeon | Sep 12 2006 3:45 utc | 41

@U$cam – No I didn’t base my thoughts on the colourful page background or the font style used, I did at least skim it, did you? 😉
The talleywhack trimming is in the science taboo section a little more than half-way down – Accepted Practises.
“It sends a message to baby boys about the world they’re entering.”
It also makes allusions to alien visitation, out of body experiences and other woo-woo ideas.
Rather than those that believe in these things being delusional or misguided, those that question the veracity of these claims are narrow minded and stuck in some dogmatic paradigm.
HEADON was just an easy example of woo-woo that apparently I’m too stuck in my paradigm to embrace. How silly of me to expect a medicine to have at least some medicinal ingredients and 1 part in 1 billion seems a little light. How silly of me (and dogmatic) to think that the idea of water having a memory is silly. How silly of me to want those that make these claims to provide proof (data or facts). The problem is my dogmatism, not their lack of facts.
BTW, I do think there is life out there. It is just a matter of where (too far & too much energy required IMHO), when (in the past, now, or future) and IF they are advanced enough to have survived their technological revolution (as we may not) to figure out how to harness 10**30 electron volts and fold space. We are a level 0 society. Capt. Kirk was (will be?) whoring around in a level 2 society – capable of mining the Sun or black holes for energy.
If a species so advanced arrives on our doorstep, we’d make great pets. They will be predators.

Posted by: gmac | Sep 13 2006 9:54 utc | 42

@gmac
Yes, I had forgotten about that, it’s been a while since I read it myself. However, The Paradigm Conspiracy by Denise Breton and Christopher Largent is as clearly written and as thought-provoking as anything I have read in a decade. As well as their other work, The Mystic Heart of Justice: Restoring Wholeness in a Broken World. Which I have also read. Yet, like beq, I have had The Soul of Economies: Spiritual Evolution Goes to the Marketplace on my self for a while now and have not read it.
And as for ‘life out there’, hell, I’m not even sure there is ‘life’ here. I often question if this isn’t proverbial hell. I ‘m reminded of the lines in John Carpenters, B movie In the mouth of madness “the flesh is a trap, a prison..” which in turn brings to mind the Bhahgavad-gita where God forgets he is god, and is trapped in a dream.
See what smoking prozac gets ya?…lol

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 13 2006 10:50 utc | 43

I knew billmon’s title was a sligh rewoking of another title, master remixer that he is..and it bugged me for days until I found the following sad news:
Man Bites Dog director dies at 38
For those who are tech savy, greylodge is the best of the webs imo, often filled with lessor know and hard to find art noir films and art.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 13 2006 10:59 utc | 44

I seem to be ina pythonesque mode, as this conversation got me thinking of this tune:

And pray that there’s intelligent life somewhere up in space
Because there’s bugger all down here on Earth

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Sep 13 2006 13:59 utc | 45

askod – exactly what I was going to say 😉

Posted by: gmac | Sep 13 2006 14:22 utc | 46

“I often question if this isn’t proverbial hell.”
It once was paradise,and anything else the beautiful blue marble has become, is down to us.

Posted by: gmac | Sep 13 2006 14:33 utc | 47

Yes, gmac, as they say, “If God has created us in his own image, we have more than reciprocated…”
And those whom are waiting on the dems to save em, they keep thinking “help is on the way “, well another quote speaks to that:
“The Messiah will come only when he is no longer necessary…” Ol’ Kafka knew who made the grass green.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 13 2006 21:30 utc | 48

if you recall, the slogan at the start of the dem convention was “hope is on the way,” led by edwards. hope is on the way! hope is on the way! they rejoiced. and it was then, on that final night when the great white hope appeared, that it was revealed to the flock that “help is on the way.” yea, help. help diverting the anger that the populace felt toward the current regime. help keeping the iraq-upation off the agenda. help the criminals pull off another stolen election. we were better off when hope was on the way.

Posted by: b real | Sep 13 2006 21:47 utc | 49