Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 12, 2006
WB: Changes

Billmon:

This is the United States of Amnesia, and history is for losers. (A friend of mine likes to say that in the Middle East, what happened a thousand years ago is far more important than yesterday’s news. Here, they’re both irrelevant.) Still, the prime-time propaganda we’ve been subjected to over the past few days makes that "you’ve covered your ass now" crack a particularly acidic pill to have to swallow.

Changes

Comments

It is, in fact, amazing to watch with what diligence the PNAC’ers have launched themselves into turning The New American Century into at best a decade.
The U.S.A. has lost its moral imperative. That’s almost unbelievable, when you consider the moral capital that this administration held in its hands on September 12, 2001. There is no such thing as a saintly and anointed ruler – but Bush could have created a positive legacy for himself that could have outlasted the history books. Instead he’ll be remembered as one of the most clueless, irresponsible and destructive presidents ever. He’s the man who lost the world’s greatest reservoirs of oil to the West – by showing nations previously subjugated by the greed of the West how weak the West actually is.

Posted by: SteinL | Sep 12 2006 9:41 utc | 1

Adding: Reading al-Zawahiri’s speech, one is struck by the fact that it’s hard to argue against his salient points — while it’s easy to laugh at Bush’s “salience” in his speech yesterday. This administration has managed to turn a policing action against AQ into a war of civilizations.

Posted by: SteinL | Sep 12 2006 9:44 utc | 2

Great comment, SteinL. People forget that there hasn’t been such a popular president since FDR. Bush’s unpopularity is not inevitable–it was the result of a conscious choice on the part of his group.

Posted by: Lennonist | Sep 12 2006 16:22 utc | 3

Something’s bothering ABC, and it isn’t just Monday Night Football, or even the potential loss of right-wing sponsors…It probably isn’t Disney, either–not before last week, anyway…But since I don’t follow this industry, I can only guess at its problems.
One possibility comes to mind: it’s that the networks can’t follow the wars. They certainly can’t follow them as they did in Viet Nam, if only because they can’t put their own people in the field. In truth, the nets are as clueless as the rest of us about the goings-on in Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, and Gaza, and they get most of their news, or what they pass off as their news, from Al-Jazeera and Washington (I’m thinking, for the moment, about that Marine’s report on Anbar province, quite apart from the giant propaganda machine)….And this helplessness must be wounding to their pride and sense of credibility, especially after the modest success of their Katrina coverage.
So this bad movie probably looked to the network like a quick sure fix of some kind: sort of an exposé, a faux-investigative-report, on a topic that looks as though it’s been covered, but whose coverage (i.e. the Commission Report) hasn’t been read or remembered by ABC’s viewers (enabling ABC to capitalize, moralistically speaking, on what Billmon, in his post to this thread, refers to as our “amnesia” ). It’s a kind of story–a safe one, full of heartbreaking drama and gravitas. It looks like network journalism doing its job.
What went wrong? At some level–but where?–its people weren’t up to speed on the devious and militant knavery of the neo-cons, particularly of those that may be lurking on its own payroll.
Perhaps their irritation with blogistan convinced them that warnings about the neo-cons were partisan, inflated, and discountable. If so, then maybe they’ve learned a thing or two about the accuracy and timeliness of blog-centered reporting–about its credibility and delivery-speed. And though they may continue to blow off the blogs, they’ll still have trouble believing that their news division can, or will, do its own job (because it’s been hurt as much by the stories it doesn’t get as by the stories it does). Given the mouse’s taste for quick and drastic “solutions,” it shouldn’t surprise us if it conducts a purge of ABC, and especially of its news division.
(Disney? Disney owns the “news”? I long for the day when a couple of Chinese bankers buy up Disney and scatter its “intellectual property rights” to the four winds of the pirates populating their country.)

Posted by: alabama | Sep 12 2006 17:13 utc | 4

Billmon seems to be a brave man.

Posted by: Anonymous | Sep 12 2006 19:12 utc | 5

Billmon seems to be a brave man.
so much naturally ingrained courage he possibly takes it for granted and doesn’t even consider other options, lucky us.

Posted by: annie | Sep 12 2006 19:21 utc | 6

Billmon seems to be a brave man.
What are they going to do? Take my pool pass away?

Posted by: billmon | Sep 12 2006 20:48 utc | 7

i’m right, you take it for granted. ‘nough said

Posted by: annie | Sep 12 2006 21:30 utc | 8

i’m right, you take it for granted. ‘nough said
What I’m doing doesn’t require courage, annie. Courage is running off mimiographed copies of underground newspapers while the KGB is sniffing around your doorstep. Courage is registering voters in Mississippi in the summer of 1962, with mobs of drunken rednecks on your tail. Courage is a woman defying the religious police and daring to drive a car in Saudia Arabia. Courage is Victor Jara, playing his guitar and singing protest songs in the Santiago soccer stadium in 1973, until Pinochet’s goons cut his hands off. That’s courage. Me — I’m just killing time and fighting off the boredom of my idiotic corporate day job. That’s all.

Posted by: Billmon | Sep 12 2006 22:11 utc | 9

Courage is running off mimiographed copies of underground newspapers while the KGB is sniffing around your doorstep.
your blog (and MOA too) are todays equivalent of underground newspapers and the last i checked the sitemeter here there were some strange visitors snooping around. no worries, our version isn’t as bad as the kgb, yet.
when a person has the knowledge brains wisdom and ability to understand, see and forsee coupled w/a gift to communicate and puts him/herself in a position that exposes those views to thousands of people on a daily basis regardless of how they will be accepted especially when those views are controversial knowing and risking the likelihood a government that has made threats against those who share opposing or radical views can retaliate, continues to lead and influence society w/their talent and ability, well, you are just doing what comes naturally.
all of us who are living our lives w/our eyes open searchning for the truth where ever it takes us and not backing down, many right here on moon, are courageous. it’s going to take a society of courageous people and frankly i don’t know where they all are. at the mall perhaps.
what i like best about moon is so many posters looking under every rock. maybe we will all end up in the same gulag someday.
don’t take it too personally, if you weren’t so talented, you wouldn’t stand out.
i don’t want to get in a further debate w/you because this is not an argument i want to have or loose. we can just agree to disagree.

Posted by: annie | Sep 12 2006 23:21 utc | 10

Yea, verily, annie.
Can I get an amen?

Posted by: beq | Sep 12 2006 23:42 utc | 11

moving right along
Perhaps their irritation with blogistan convinced them that warnings about the neo-cons were partisan, inflated, and discountable. If so, then maybe they’ve learned a thing or two about the accuracy and timeliness of blog-centered reporting
abc/disney gave the big FU to the blogistan. we may have truth but they have the primetime golden sceen and damnit they are flaunting it. after all, they are only positioning their version to becomes the standard which truth is balanced against. meanwhile they have their competition following the blogs, as we noticed over the last week, including yesterday.
Given the mouse’s taste for quick and drastic “solutions,” it shouldn’t surprise us if it conducts a purge of ABC, and especially of its news division.
they can run but they can’t hide. bet there’s been a fair amount of teethgrinding in the last week.

Posted by: annie | Sep 12 2006 23:50 utc | 12

maybe we will all end up in the same gulag someday.
Well, at least we finally all get to meet. That is not to bad. Then there is of course the torture and stuff, but you got to focus the bright side of life.

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Sep 13 2006 0:04 utc | 13

Ha ha ha…. SKOD! You made me conjure of the last scene from “The Life of Brian” with that comment(#13)! I’m hearing that stupid funny jaunty tune they were playing while Brian and the others were hanging there on the crosses…”Always look on the bright side of life”!
Thanks for the smile.

Posted by: maxcrat | Sep 13 2006 0:32 utc | 14

Yea, verily, annie.
Can I get an amen?
Posted by: beq | Sep 12, 2006 7:42:08 PM | 11
Amen.

Posted by: Ms. Manners | Sep 13 2006 2:09 utc | 15

I sincerely regret my intemperate remarks to Miss DEBS, just last week, re: 205 v. 20#. As if IPU addresses can be threatening.
Fortunately some serious minded folk cleared this all up:
MEMO TO DONALD
Some bloke’s duck got garroted. we’re roasting it in the oven right now.
Hope it tastes good.
Do We Know the Way To San Jose?
Old Song. You Betcha.
Where is Slothrop?
I want to take him to my bosom and suckle him. And feed him a few left overs, as much as he can stomach at his tender age.

Posted by: Ms. Manners | Sep 13 2006 2:39 utc | 16

Sorry, Link above didn’t work.
LINK

Posted by: Ms. Manners | Sep 13 2006 2:50 utc | 17

at least we finally all get to meet
laughing w/maxcrat, good one skod

Posted by: annie | Sep 13 2006 3:23 utc | 18

Can we do by dividing reality into the double plus good and the double plus ungood thus establishing that to think any un ungood can come from the ungood is ungood? That when pretending to be un ungood they are really being un un ungood which is more ungood than ungood?
Ms manners, now that’s looking at the sunnyside, no?
maybe i’m confusing my un’s

Posted by: annie | Sep 13 2006 3:35 utc | 19

Well, what do you expect from Negroponte 60 bodies found tortured and dead in Baghdad today , quite frankly, I’m shocked there isn’t more…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 13 2006 12:11 utc | 20

How about 65?

Posted by: beq | Sep 13 2006 12:35 utc | 21

I was thinking: We’ll Meet Again

Posted by: beq | Sep 13 2006 12:43 utc | 22

as concerned as the “authorities” might be about billmon and other web phenoms, heres something that would really piss em off.
What if billmon were to apply his immense gifts towards some kind of “kiddie learning and interactive site” flavored with billmonese that kids can relate to. To glimpse how a writer with billmons unique organic-style might connect with kids, think Harry Potter. Get the drift ? And if anyone can pull it off, billmon can.
but for whatever its worth, this is probably not something billmon would find intellectually stimulating. And I would be very worried for him. Its never happened before but heres a future headline to think about – “Billmon goes underground”

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Sep 13 2006 13:30 utc | 23

What if billmon were to apply his immense gifts towards some kind of “kiddie learning and interactive site” flavored with billmonese that kids can relate to …

He would be Nick Berg’ed by Bill O’Rielly on the FOX News set in front of a live audience within a fortnight and I don’t think Billmon wants his head to part company with his shoulders just yet, especially not over a 20-40 page children’s book at $7.99 (with 15% off if Mom & Dad have a Waldens/B&K/Borders “Prefered Readers” card) — the delight of Freepers/LGFers be damned …

Posted by: Sizemore | Sep 16 2006 12:54 utc | 24

Sizemore, I hear you.
And if Bill O’Reilly ever wants to take on a blogger, billmon would probably be a bad choice for him.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Sep 27 2006 2:42 utc | 25