Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 26, 2006
Weekend OT

Enjoy …

Comments

Confessions of a Muslim Dissident Irshad Manji, on her ‘thoroughly non-military campaign’, at google video. Her website: Muslim Refusenik…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 26 2006 6:21 utc | 1

Guardian: Empire, and resistance to it, is the central issue of our time

‘How goes the empire?” Perhaps Tony Blair will be tempted to repeat King George V’s dying words as he prepares to shuffle off his own political coil. It is a measure of the extent to which the prime minister’s foreign policy has restored imperialism to the political vocabulary of the country that, when his legacy is debated, the state of empire will be the main issue.
The answer is that it goes pretty badly. The new imperialism which will for ever be linked to the names Bush and Blair has taken just five years to hit the buffers of popular opposition and moral ignominy. Imperialism has moved from the realm of political jargon to be the central issue of our time – and is seen as such everywhere beyond the ramparts of the neoconservative-New Labour alliance.
….

Posted by: b | Aug 26 2006 6:46 utc | 2

I hear Irshad loud & clear and I can feel how her experience in the madressa impacted her.
But most young Muslims around the world are not exposed to the type of madressa she attended.
The experience of a young Christian raised in the Bible belt and exposed daily to religious doctrine is going to be different from that of Christian kids raised for example in the North East.

Posted by: jony_b_cool | Aug 26 2006 7:01 utc | 3

The creeping US policy change toward multi-lateralism continues unabated, and is still led by the money men. Next to this Coup of the Goldmänner the fall elections are almost a non-event. Bernanke yesterday in Jackson Hole:

Bernanke also warned policymakers about downsides of the rapid pace of globalization in terms of lost jobs, disrupted livelihoods and wrenching change. “The challenge for policy makers,” he said, “is to ensure that the benefits of global economic integration are sufficiently wide-shared – for example, by helping displaced workers get the necessary training to take advantage of new opportunities – that a consensus for welfare-enhancing change can be obtained.”

Bottom-line: infantile US unilateralism is dead or dying. Soft power is coming back and will be much harder to beat.

Posted by: Guthman Bey | Aug 26 2006 13:24 utc | 4

Excellent article by John Mueller.
“Is There Still a Terrorist Threat?”

Posted by: Ensley | Aug 26 2006 13:38 utc | 5

Juan Cole giving an opinion where there seems to be nothing about this in the UK media.

First, the British withdrew from Camp Abu Naji near Amara. They only gave the Iraqis one day notice. This short notice suggests that the evacuation was done under considerable duress; one suspects that the British position was becoming untenable because of repeated Shiite guerrilla attacks (there were only 1200 British troops there). When they left, they left behind nearly $300,000 in equipment, intending that the Iraqi police should have the use of the base.
Muqtada al-Sadr and his followers on the provincial Governing Council crowed that the Mahdi Army was the first Iraqi group to force a substantial withdrawal of Coalition troops from an Iraqi territory, according to Amit Paley. The LA Times says that the Mahdi Army boasted of having forced the British troops to leave so abruptly.
While a small contingent of Iraqi security forces (mainly recruited from the Badr Corps and the Mahdi Army) was on the base, they professed themselves helpless when some 5000 looters, some armed with AK 47 machine guns, showed up to strip it bare. The poor British officer corps was reduced to maintaining that the camp had been kept in perfectly good order on their departure. God, they must hate Blair.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Aug 26 2006 13:52 utc | 6

Then Juan Cole continues with this juicy morsel:

Then in Ramadi, guerrillas holed up in the Abdul Qadir al-Kailani Mosque attacked US troops. The latter returned fire, and ultimately brought up M1 Abrams tanks and fired at the religious building. It was left with structural damage to its dome and minaret. The guerrillas set the US troops up for a lose/lose situation. By subjecting the mosque to tank fire, they look to Iraqi Muslims like anti-Muslim infidels.
If you thought that attacking a mosque associated with the great Sufi saint Abdul Qadir Gilani (Kailani) might anger members of his Qadiri Sufi order around the world, you’d be right.
Paley also reports:
‘ In other developments, the head of a major Iraqi sect of Sufism, a mystical branch of Islam that had previously rejected violence against U.S.-led coalition forces, declared holy war on American troops. The leader, Sheik Mohammed al-Qadiri, said his sect would form a new group, the Battalions of Sh[e]ikh Abdul Qadir al-Gaillani, and join the insurgency.
“We will not wait for the Mahdi Army and the Badr Brigade to enter our houses and kill us,” said Ahmed al-Soffi, a Sufi leader in the western city of Fallujah, referring to the country’s major Shiite militias. “We will fight the Americans and the Shiites who are against us.” ‘

Posted by: Malooga | Aug 26 2006 14:35 utc | 7

My last Billmon post on Whiskey Bar was 22 August. Trust he’s just resting . . .
The Blogging of the President, or BOP News, hasn’t been available all week (Sterling Newberry, Hale Stewart, and all those) to my browser. Anyone know what’s going on?

Posted by: mudduck | Aug 26 2006 16:44 utc | 8

or, in better words, the last new posting from Billmon on Whiskey Bar that’s showed up on my browser was on 22 August.
Atrios mentioned last week that some people using Firefox weren’t getting the latest postings when accessing his site. I’ve noticed that sometimes I get yesterday’s posting on several sites, and have to hit REFRESH for the new stuff.
Computers.

Posted by: mudduck | Aug 26 2006 16:47 utc | 9

A careful killer…
Slayer of Rudy’s ex-aide took keys, phone, laptop Sounds like someone wanted something, like info maybe?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 26 2006 16:57 utc | 10

@muddock – there is currently no DNS-Entry available for http://www.bopnews.com – i.e. no server belongs to that name. But the name itself exist and is registered to stirling.newberry_at_xigenics.net. You can probably reach him under that address.
Billmon once in while is just busy, on vacation, exausted or whatever. He’ll be back (I hope).

Posted by: b | Aug 26 2006 17:43 utc | 11

@Enslin – thanks for that “terrorist” link.
The chances to die in car crash on the way to the airport are a magnitude higher than to get blown up in a plane. Terrorism is a phenomenon that jhas always been there and will always be there. Here in Germany some Lebanese redneck students just tried to blow up two trains but didn´t know the craft (this one looks real from what I can tell, unlike the British “fluid bombs”.)
But there is definitly no need to be frightened. Death will come one way or another and death by terroism is about the lowest available possibility.
Another recent good piece on the issue is by Bruce Schneider What the Terrorists Want

The implausible plots and false alarms actually hurt us in two ways. Not only do they increase the level of fear, but they also waste time and resources that could be better spent fighting the real threats and increasing actual security. I’ll bet the terrorists are laughing at us.
Another thought experiment: Imagine for a moment that the British government arrested the 23 suspects without fanfare. Imagine that the TSA and its European counterparts didn’t engage in pointless airline-security measures like banning liquids. And imagine that the press didn’t write about it endlessly, and that the politicians didn’t use the event to remind us all how scared we should be. If we’d reacted that way, then the terrorists would have truly failed.

Posted by: b | Aug 26 2006 18:07 utc | 12

I ask, does this sound like an open and honest government to you?
Senator who put ‘secret hold’ on bill to open federal records is a secret, too

WASHINGTON — In an ironic twist, legislation that would open up the murky world of government contracting to public scrutiny has been derailed by a secret parliamentary maneuver.
An unidentified senator placed a “secret hold” on legislation introduced by Sens. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Barack Obama, D-Ill., that would create a searchable database of government contracts, grants, insurance, loans and financial assistance, worth $2.5 trillion last year. The database would bring transparency to federal spending and be as simple to use as conducting a Google search.

‘Transparency’ is a dirty word to many members of Congress.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 26 2006 18:12 utc | 13

There were 7 airline incidents Friday! This one really stands out! ” A United Airlines flight out of Chicago was delayed because a SMALL BOY said something INAPPROPRIATE according to a goverment official speaking on condition of anonymity because of the SENSITIVITY of the information. He didn’t want to fly, the official said.”………We’re almost at the point where they want us!

Posted by: R.L. | Aug 26 2006 18:29 utc | 14

The Cheney presidency

When historians look back on the multiple assaults on our constitutional system of government in this era, Cheney’s unprecedented role will come in for overdue notice. Cheney’s shotgun mishap, when he accidentally sprayed his host with birdshot, has gotten more media attention than has his control of the government.

Intelligence on Iran being “Fixed” by Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld – Just like on Iraq
Cornelius: [reading from the sacred scrolls of the apes] Beware the beast man, for he is the Devil’s pawn. Alone among God’s primates, he kills for sport or lust or greed. Yea, he will murder his brother to possess his brother’s land. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours. Shun him; drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death.~Planet of the Apes (1968)

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 26 2006 18:32 utc | 15

After getting their ass handed to them by Hezbollah, looks like the IDF is back to doing what they do best: murdering rock throwing Palestinian teenagers.

Posted by: ran | Aug 26 2006 19:16 utc | 16

Interesting you should bring that up R.L. as I ran across this last week:
Sudden Rash of Diverted Flights
Also see, Rise of the spineless fuckwits
Also of note, Strange airline stocks shorting activities in Europe ahead of terror plot discovery raise doubt about who knew what and when?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 26 2006 19:18 utc | 17

Also see AngrArab on the terror suspects in Germany:

Highly-placed sources in Beirut inform me that the all “those suspects in Germany’s train bombings are members of” the political arm of Hariri Inc. So basically, US allies in Lebanon are now aligned with Al-Qa`idah–well, they have been for a while now.

Posted by: Guthman Bey | Aug 26 2006 19:27 utc | 18

Cockburn says it all in this morning’s Counterpunch. Here’s a wee teaser from
Israel on the Slide
:

Disfigured by its “special relationship” with the US arms industry, of which the US Congress is an integral component, the IDF has been morally corrupted by years of risk-free brutalization of unarmed Palestinians, many of them children. It’s one thing to level an apartment building with a missile from a plane or crush a protester with a bulldozer or lob shells at a Palestinian family having a picnic on a beach or kidnap middle-aged and democratically elected Palestinian politicians. It’s another confront a foe, with modest but effectively deployed weaponry, prepared to fight back.

He also sums up the state of zionism and it’s leadership in Israel and the US pretty succinctly.
From the part on US zionist leaders:

You can read plenty of commentary round the world, most particularly Israel, saying this recent war was a benchmark event, which could conceivably teach Israel that security is not won by unending land grabs, by spouting hokum for US consumption about the “peace process”, and by terror bombing of Lebanon and Gaza. But not in the United States. Open up the Washington Post and the strategic vision on display was an utterly mad piece co-written by one of the big boosters for war on Iraq, Kenneth Pollack, a hack thinker at the Brookings Institution, now an integral part of Israeli territory with its “Saban Center for Middle East Policy” named for the fanatic Zionist billionaire Haim Saban, majority owner of Paramount Pictures, a man who handed the Democratic Party a total of $12.3 million in 2002, a $7 million component of which was the biggest single contribution ever recorded up to that time.
Silent about his own role as war promoter (his speciality was Saddam’s imaginary nuclear threat), oblivious to the lessons of disaster in Iraq, reduplicated in the war in Lebanon, Pollack and Georgetown U’s Daniel Byman called for more US troops to be sent to Iraq, to help set up “refugee collection points” ­ ie concentration camps ­ on Iraq’s eastern border and for tripwires ­ no doubt ultimately nuclear ­ to be established in expectation of war with Iran. You think Republican neocons are the only crazy ones? Not one word of mature reflection about the significance of the war temporarily suspended, against Lebanon and Hezbollah.
Thirty years ago I used to be told that liberal American Jews were aghast at the rise of the ur-neocon fanatics like Norman Podhoretz, at Commentary, whose parent outfit was and is the American Jewish Committee. Soon, such liberals used to say to me off the record, there would be a counter-attack by the forces of reason, as embodied in liberal American Jewry. There never was, at least on any effective scale. The liberal Jewish intelligentsia here has, politically, speaking, sat on its hands for decades, mouths zipped shut, when it comes to criticizing Israel. Even more effectively than America’s defense contractors they have contributed to, and indeed cheered on Israel’s corrupt rejectionism. Will this war make them change their minds? I doubt it.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Aug 26 2006 21:04 utc | 19

Uncle Scam……This is typical……The Yahoo report(byline Kristen Hays) says of the student(no name or age) flying from Argentina that “traces” of dynamite were found. My newspaper(Louisville Courier-Journal) report(byline Kristen Hays) says there was a stick of dynamite found and gives the students name and age…Howard Mcfarland Fish 21.My report says the dynamite was found shortly after Flight52 landed about 6:AM(6:20AM Yahoo)……Now was it first reported as traces and the reporter ran with that and then in a short time a stick was found? I don’t think so! They are so much”Fucking With Our Heads”!

Posted by: R.L. | Aug 26 2006 21:13 utc | 20

Meanwhile the IDF are the real terrorists.

Two missiles fired by Israeli aircraft early Sunday morning hit an armored car belonging to the Reuters news agency, moderately wounding two television cameramen and three bystanders, Palestinian witnesses and hospital officials said.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Aug 26 2006 23:16 utc | 21

Can you say Orchestrated Hysteria…??

Posted by: jj | Aug 27 2006 0:09 utc | 22

What has to be faced in the WOT(War on Terror) is that “If you’re not going to kill them all,you will have to kill them forever”!

Posted by: R.L. | Aug 27 2006 2:05 utc | 23

R.L.
The war on terror can only be won when the U.S. goes totally autocratic, and strips all our freedoms away. Then the terrorists will have no reason to hate us. Jelousy, after all, is the root of all evil.

Posted by: anna missed | Aug 27 2006 2:35 utc | 24

Someone posted pic of Bu$h fishing boat the other day. We were a little slow on the uptake, or I certainly was. Obviously, once one thinks about it, wouldn’t a boat known as the “ferrari of the high seas” be useful above all for drug smuggling, and there’s some evidence that Daddykins may have bought it from just such a person. (The poor syntax shouldn’t be taken to imply that I think bu$hes themselves stoop to smuggling!)
Fidelity is a class of boat marketed under the brand name of “Cigarette,” a high-priced speedboat dubbed “the Ferrari of the high seas.” This detail should awaken our interest, since Bush’s profile as an Anglo-Saxon aristocrat would normally include a genteel predilection for sailing, rather than a preference for a vulgar hotrod like Fidelity, which evokes the ethos of rum-runners and smugglers.
The Cigarette boat Fidelity was purchased by George Bush from a certain Don Aronow. Bush reportedly met Aronow at a boat show in 1974, and decided to buy one of the Cigarette boats Aronow manufactured. Aronow was one of the most celebrated and successful powerboat racers of the 1960’s, and had then turned his hand to designing and building these boats. But according to at least one published account, there is compelling evidence to conclude that Aronow was a drug smuggler and suspected drug-money launderer linked to the Genovese Purple Gang of New York City within the more general framework of the Meyer Lansky organized crime syndicate. Aronow’s role in marijuana smuggling was reportedly confirmed by Bill Norris, head of the Major Narcotics Unit at the Miami US Attorney’s office and thus the top federal drug prosecution official in south Florida.
link

Posted by: jj | Aug 27 2006 2:52 utc | 25

Portrait of the Insurgent as a Young Man:
I Am Malacca

Posted by: Ms Manners | Aug 27 2006 2:57 utc | 26

American Coup D’Etat. Will the most powerful and well-funded institution on the planet remain under civilian command indefinitely? As the domestic spying saga unfolds and militarism rises, Harper’s brought four experts – both academics and brass – to discuss the possibilities.
“To subdue America entirely, the only route remaining would be to seize the machinery of state itself, to steer it toward malign ends—to carry out, that is, a coup d’état.”

Posted by: Anonymous | Aug 27 2006 3:43 utc | 27

Good News, he’s back with another good one!
Hey…I was getting a little worried there… I’ll sleep better knowing the world keeps turning.

Posted by: Rick Happ | Aug 27 2006 3:47 utc | 28

somehow, while searching for a release date for the next douglas valentine book on the DEA, i ended up perusing thru an issue of small wars journal. some really whack stuff in there. one essay, by a civie no less, posited that guerillas win b/c they are able to politically motivate the masses thru indoctrination, unleashing their violent instincts, whereas conventional forces, counterinsurgents, are made up of apolitical troops and, thus, at a disadvantage. his solution?

The answer to the politically charged guerrilla fighter is the development of a politically charged counter-insurgency fighter, a political warfighter. A political warfighter that understands the political aim and political program of the counter-insurgency campaign. A political warfighter who can galvanize the primordial violence and hateful instincts of the people against the insurgent enemy. A political warfighter that can unlock the political fanaticism of the people just as the French revolutionaries, Napoleon, Mao Tse-Tung and Vo Nguyen Giap did in past wars. The political warfighter is the spark. The political message is the fuel. The people’s hatred and animosity are the fire. The fire that forges a successful war machine.

Posted by: b real | Aug 27 2006 4:04 utc | 29

I’ll sleep better knowing the world keeps turning
I think Bernhard has been doing rather a fine job of keeping the world turning also.

Posted by: Ensley | Aug 27 2006 4:07 utc | 30

Ensley,
I agree 200%.
Bernhard has my utmost admiration and respect.
He has been doing a fine job, and if I didn’t see him posting consistently I would be worried also.

Posted by: Rick Happ | Aug 27 2006 4:31 utc | 31

The Ministry of Truth Strikes Again, and Again, and Again…

The reactionary campaign against knowledge and information is reaching frightening new heights.
The Environmental Protection Agency has been ordered by the White House to “shut down [its] libraries, end public access to research materials and box up unique collections on the assumption that Congress will not reverse President Bush’s proposed budget reductions.” Fifteen states will lose library service immediately, the rest will follow, and the public is to be turned away as soon as possible.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 27 2006 6:05 utc | 32

In light of the charges of sexism that get levelled here against anyone who criticises a woman (I think we’re getting a bit lax. Several people have recently mentioned that Joe Lieberman is a turncoat and neocon bootlicker without immediately being branded antisemitic Nazis), I was very careful to look around for the most flattering link in which to be ignored over in regards to Katherine Harris’ latest wacky hijinks.
Then I ran across Wonkette’s coverage of the story, and I am frankly perplexed. Yeah, yeah, I know it’s Wonkette… but… if someone here accused the honorouble batshit-insane Harris of suffering from PMS (as one of the comments over there implied), every bystander here would be rounded up and tried for crimes against the X-chromosome and offered up as sacrifices to Artemis. And for Wonkette herself (or himself… y’know, this could all be a clever misogynist plot!) to have offered Harris an abdominal exerciser to keep her off the streets… well, I just don’t know what this world is coming to.
I just wish a male WASP like the Great Decider had made the identical remarks so I could make some jokes about how fucking stupid they were.

Posted by: Monolycus | Aug 27 2006 12:29 utc | 33

Monolycus, it is time to send good vibes to Katherine Harris’ campaign. The primary is Sept 5th, I believe. We want her to win over the other Republican candidates, said Republican candidates possibly having a small chance to win the Nov election. Harris has no chance at all against Bill Nelson, and therefore her two month campaign is going to be a souce of absolutely wonderful amusement. She’s the proverbial gift that keeps on giving.
Here in Florida, we’re getting our popcorn ready, finding a comfy chair and preparing ourselves for lots of laughter; kind of like a modern day rerun of Rowan & Martin’s Laugh In.

Posted by: Ensley | Aug 27 2006 13:25 utc | 34

#27 was mine, and I am somewhat astounded that no one has commented on it, or perhaps you are like me, in that I was so totally flabbergasted by it that I could not put together a logical comment.
One thing is clear, we are past the past the Rubicon…
Snip:
LUTTWAK: Such a scenario would probably play out through a multi-stage transformation. After all, take any group of nice people on a trip; if five bad things happen to them in a row, they will end up as cannibals. How many adverse events are needed before a political system, arguably the most firmly rooted constitutional system in the history of the world, becomes uprooted? How many September 11ths, on what scale? How much panic, what kind of leadership?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 27 2006 13:47 utc | 35

Also, I found some excepts from Luttwak’s Coup D’Etat: A Practical Handbook here (also the book is available at amazon It’s very out-of-date (written in 1969) but still fascinating. The guy has been studying this stuff for years.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 27 2006 13:55 utc | 36

@Uncle – the Harper piece was posted end of June – it was linked here before, so don´t expect too many comments.

Posted by: b | Aug 27 2006 14:53 utc | 37

monolycus #33;
The discussion here is often sexist and anti-semitic, but I haven’t seen any defense of kathleen harris or joe lieberman, so I wonder what you have in mind.

Posted by: citizen k | Aug 27 2006 14:55 utc | 38

Chad orders oil giants to leave

Chad has given the oil companies Chevron and Petronas a 24-hour deadline to leave the country for not paying taxes.
The president gave the oil production consortium that is led by Exxon Mobil, a deadline of just 24 hours to start making plans to leave.
Neither Kuala Lumpur-based Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) nor the California-based Chevron immediately commented on Derby’s declaration.
The decision came a day after Deby ordered his government to take a greater role in the production of oil, which is viewed as a way to improve the country’s ailing economy.
On Friday, Hourmadji Moussa Doumgor, a Chad government spokesman, told reporters that Deby wanted greater profits from oil production.
Chad’s oil revenues will be used
to reduce poverty
Deby has stressed that the country “should fully enjoy its oil, mining and other resources,” Doumgor said.
Chad is in the midst of setting up a national oil company and Deby has said that Chad would take responsibility for the oil fields that the American and Malaysian companies have overseen, which accounts for 60% of the country’s oil production.

this should be interesting

Posted by: annie | Aug 27 2006 14:58 utc | 39

Sorry, b I must have missed it…
Nevertheless, they are batting around a hypothetical, falsly analyzing a third world style coup in America.
Instead there was a different model created – the National Security State – and successfully implimented.
They must have had a hard time keeping the giggles in…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 27 2006 15:29 utc | 40

More ruminations on LUTTWAK: (for those whom might find it interesting)
EDWARD N. LUTTWAK is a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the author of many books, including Coup D’Etat: A Practical Handbook
Luttwak also has is nose in the Italian CIA/SISMI Abu Omar rendition case related to high-level wiretapping and the “suicide” of Adamo Bove, the wiretapping techie whistleblower. And if he has his nose in the wiretapping and CIA/SISMI doings in Italy, it is likely he is not too far from Ledeen and other neo-gladio P2 machinations.
Regarding the too ‘oft missed significance of the National Security State. Not that it can’t be undone or isn’t undoing itself – either by us or by succumbing to something like RAW’s “optimum fuckup,” or both.
See: Celine’s Law for more on RAW’s “optimum fuckup.”
“…The SISMi scandal continues to unfold. Yesterday it was revealed that Pirelli employed a CIA station chief formerly stationed in Mogadiscio, John Paul Spinelli. Pirelli and Telecom are closely linked through the same ownership. It appears that employees of Pirelli and Telecom may have been involved in the Abu Omar kidnapping, along with employees of Cipriani’s private security companies. Cipriani received regular payments from Telecom for tens of millions of euros through a series of societies abroad.
Excerpts of Pio Pompa’s intercepted phone calls indicate frequent and friendly conversations with Edward Luttwak of the Washington based CSIS. According to reports in the Repubblica, Luttwak was kept abreast of developments and probable disinformation campaigns in the Abu Omar kidnapping case.
Edward Luttwak is a regular fixture on Italian television as some sort of expert. He spent many years of his childhood in Italy as a refugee and speaks fluent Italian.
The CSIS has always been a favoured conduit for undercover operations and disinformation campaigns in Italy as well as South America. A favourite think tank of the Reagan and the Bush père administrations, it earned its brownie points with the Billygate scandal. That scandal tipped the scales in favour of Reagan…..”

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 27 2006 17:13 utc | 41

Luttwak first called get the hell out of Iraq, you’ve screwed up in July 2003, shortly after Boosh said Bring it On.
Tony Cordesman has been highly critical since fall 2003.
CSIS reads fine in my parallel world.
Maybe the Professor, Kari Wuherer, and I should slide over to your parallel world and check your CSIS out.

Posted by: Ms Manners | Aug 27 2006 18:02 utc | 42

Meanwhile, a truly precious momemt:
Gorillas Run Amuck in Western Virginia
This is hilarious. Don’t forget your pop corn, milk, and cookies, but also bring a crate of bannanas to keep the gorillas happy.

Posted by: Ms Manners | Aug 27 2006 18:16 utc | 43

Department of Pricked Bubbles:
Ill feelings continue about the fake interview with Nasrallah published by Counterpunch. Coburn is being bitchy about it, AngryArab answers and in the comments section of the AngryArab blog the true reason for the widespread irritation is laid out:

I read that interview, and got a funny bubbly feeling of a new dawn – a new global resistance between all the peoples of the Earth from all corners of the Earth. Religion was minimized whhile the ethos of liberation and justice became the new edifice of revolutionary struggles throughout the the world.
I even imagined narco-terrorists in Colombia, revolutionaries in the endless string of islands in southeast Asia, dormant leftist youths in Europe, Africans and even the Aborigine downunder were all coming to this great political party – BYOB of course.
So professor you had to go and blow my little respite – send asunder my little bubble of a renewed global impetus to rid the world of evil.
(Shakes pointer finger violently at you!!!)
Anomalous | 08.27.06 – 1:19 pm | #

Like it or not, Nasrallah and Hezbollah are deeply reactionary. A political situation where the quasi totality of secular forces are so compromised and corrupt as to make Hezbollah the natural heroes (and that’s what they are, I won’t dispute that) is not just fucked-up, it’s ultra-fucked-up.

Posted by: Guthman Bey | Aug 27 2006 18:43 utc | 44

GB: Don’t rain on the support/solidarity parade. We are all Hisbolla now! Peoples Revolutionary Fedayin Front, Suburban Mall Branch.

Posted by: citizen k | Aug 27 2006 19:05 utc | 45

@GB:
Those two links are about the funniest things I’ve read on the net in 3-4 years.
The angry arab closes:
“and I consider Cockburn a real leftist–who am I to judge (except being the all-knowing, Wise One of course).”
“Cockburn only reinforces the perception that is deeply held by non-leftists about leftists: that leftists have no sense of humor, and not even a sense of irony. So in the spirit of internationalist solidarity I say: lighten up, comrade Alexander. Finally, I think that I need to remind leftists out there: Hasan Nasrallah is NOT a leftist, ok? (his “interview” in Counterpunch notwithstanding)”

Posted by: Ms Manners | Aug 27 2006 19:50 utc | 46

WTF? I’m sorry, but give me a break–we’re suppposed to believe that the leak was accidental, the result of gossipyness? From Newsweek:
Richard Armitage, Plame leaker?

A book coauthored by NEWSWEEK’s Michael Isikoff details Richard Armitage’s central role in the Valerie Plame leak.

Snip:

“…Armitage, a well-known gossip who loves to dish and receive juicy tidbits about Washington characters, apparently hadn’t thought through the possible implications of telling Novak about Plame’s identity. “I’m afraid I may be the guy that caused this whole thing,” he later told Carl Ford Jr., State’s intelligence chief. Ford says Armitage admitted to him that he had “slipped up” and told Novak more than he should have. “He was basically beside himself that he was the guy that f—ed up. My sense from Rich is that it was just chitchat,” Ford recalls in “Hubris,” to be published next week by Crown and co-written by the author of this article and David Corn, Washington editor of The Nation magazine.”

I don’t buy it. Something smells fishy here. Is there a conspiracy of modern times that Armitage wasn’t involved in? What’s the deal, does he have cancer or something, and so volunteered to be the foolish, gossipy idiot, as we’re being led to believe? Bullshit…
Armitage is just about the most unlikely of casual gossipers.
He was involved in all sorts of wild stuff from 1973 to 1978, when he is assumed to have been with the CIA. Making arrangements leading up to the fall of Saigon. A DIA consultant in Tehran in 1975-76, when the Shackley/Clines rogue CIA group was moving its arms-drugs-and-assassination operations there. A charter member of the Enterprise, dealing in particular with heroin-smuggling from Thailand and money-laundering of the profits.
(Just for shits and giggles, guess the name of the author of Shackley’s biography. Hint — his initials are DC.)
In the 80’s, became Reagan’s Assistant Secretary of Defense. In charge of coordinating covert military operations, including Ollie North’s aid to the Contras. Also part of the Iran end of Iran-Contra. And helped Bill Casey run the mujahedeen war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.
In the 90’s, was a member of the American Turkish Council (the people Sibel Edmonds keeps talking about), the US-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce, and the Aspen Institute.
And in the Bush administration, knew beforehand about the Ledeen-Ghorbanifar meetings in Rome in December 2001, helped keep the Niger claims out of Powell’s UN address, and requested the Ford memo on Wilson.
And we’re expected to believe that this man, who has been involved in virtually every covert and dubious operation over the last 35 years, was just flapping his mouth idly for the fun of it?
Oh, yeah, and mister, will you please sell me that bridge?
It took them three years to get their story straight:
ROBERT NOVAK: MASTER OF HYPOCRISY
“…Incredibly, after all the hoopla and trouble that he’s caused, Novak is now back peddling and squirming.
On July 22, 2003, he told Newsday, regarding his acquisition of Plame’s name and identity, “I didn’t dig it out, it was given to me. They thought it was significant, they gave me the name and I used it.” …
more on Armitage here

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 28 2006 3:09 utc | 47

Re: “Gorilla” warfare at KOS
Dressing up in monkey suits and momentarily inconveniencing political nobodies like Junior Senator George Allen? Finally, we are seeing a group with real vision for the future! Ah, if only Bolívar or Wallace had had that kind of tactical brilliance! Beware, tyrants! As long as there is an open costume shop and fanatical adherents to a superfluous second party, you will receive no mercy!
Rest easy, mon ami, all will soon be well. Disregard that unhealthy draft in the room, our knights in shining armour… er… furry monkey suits have finally arrived to save us! Who will have time to worry over civil liberties or wars of aggression when we so busy peeling bananas with our feet?

Posted by: Monolycus | Aug 28 2006 3:45 utc | 48

Uncle:
I understand. But a lot of that can’t be proved.
You know it but you can’t prove it in a court of law.
It tears good prosecutors up every day.
Doubt that arbitrage ratted anyone.
Hard case to prove, any which way.

Posted by: Ms Manners | Aug 28 2006 3:57 utc | 49

@Unca
I wouldn’t be too concerned about Armitage being assigned to take the fall here. As we have seen, throwing yourself on your sword for a Bush has historically been a pretty career-enhancing move.

Posted by: Monolycus | Aug 28 2006 4:03 utc | 50

Flynt Leverett – ex member of the Bush administration: Illusion and Reality

Three and a half years after the invasion of Iraq and five years after 9-11, the outbreak of armed conflict between Israel and radical groups in the Palestinian territories and Lebanon has revealed how badly the president’s chosen Middle East strategy has damaged the interests of the United States and its allies in the region. The current conflict — which comes alongside a growing likelihood of strategic failure in Iraq — shows the negative consequences of the administration’s disdain for diplomatic engagement with problematic but pivotal players in the region. It is far from clear that the administration or, sadly, opposition Democrats will learn the right lessons from this episode. If they do not, the United States will likely suffer further damage to its position in the Middle East, with dangerous implications for America’s ability to protect its interests and ensure the long-term security of Israel.

Posted by: b | Aug 28 2006 7:20 utc | 51

Israeli Siege Leaves Gaza Isolated and Desperate

The war in southern Lebanon has overshadowed Israel’s second front, a military and economic siege of the Gaza Strip that is deepening the poverty and desperation in this dense area of 1.4 million people.
More than 200 Palestinians, at least 44 of them children, have been killed in the past 8 1/2 weeks. Three Israeli soldiers have been killed. Huge Israeli bulldozers and “pinpoint” missiles have razed at least 40 houses and dozens of other buildings, according to the army, leaving many families homeless.
Daily skirmishes regularly result in new casualties. The Israelis attack with tanks, F-16 jets and artillery. [Early Monday, an Israeli airstrike killed four members of the Hamas-led security force in the Gaza Strip, the Reuters news agency reported, citing medics and witnesses. An Israeli army spokeswoman confirmed the report, but said two of the men were apparently killed by gunfire from ground troops.]
The Palestinians launch an average of about six crude Qassam rockets a week into Israel, causing minimal damage, no fatalities and about a dozen injuries since June 28, an army spokesman said.

Posted by: b | Aug 28 2006 7:53 utc | 52

I agree Monolycus, these fucks are masters at shell games not because they are so cunning and skillful but, mostly due to media compliance and in particular, it’s general strategy of omission.

Posted by: Anonymous | Aug 28 2006 13:21 utc | 53

crap, was me #53 above…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 28 2006 13:22 utc | 54

Didn’t we have some US generals crowing just a few days ago about how we’d tamed the violence of Baghdad with our mighty Stryker vehicles?
Bullshit

Posted by: ran | Aug 28 2006 13:29 utc | 55

sibel edmonds breaks down hilary clinton’s opportunism in stark terms. i doubt that tassini will defeat her, but i’ve been considering registering as a dem just to be able to vote against in her in the primary. this just convinced me:

Senator Hillary Clinton: All Show and no Substance
By Sibel Edmonds & William Weaver
Recent surveys measuring public opinion and confidence in congress all arrived at the same conclusion: over seventy percent of Americans have lost faith and confidence in the United States Congress. The public no longer trusts this body of politicians who were elected to represent the people and the peoples’ interests. Instead, they now view these “representatives” as servants of special interest groups, corporations and high-powered lobbyists. Americans are tired of watching and listening to elected officials who refrain from taking a strong stand on crucial issues, and who almost never state their positions with conviction and sincerity. In the eyes of the nation these senators and representatives are nothing more than programmed publicity puppets, competing for face time in the media. Common adjectives used by our citizens to describe these officials clearly reflect their sentiments: “spineless,” “phony,” “corrupt,” “out of touch,” “timid,” “all show and no substance,” and the list goes on. Why have we Americans lost confidence and faith in those elected? Where and when did we go wrong; or perhaps more correctly, they go wrong? What have these representatives done, or, failed to do, that arouses such anger and loathing in the very same constituents who voted them into office?
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is a perfect example; an elected senator who has served six years in her seat, never taking a strong stand in support of her constituents on any serious or controversial issue; a senator who has used her record-breaking TV public appearances to say “nothing”; a senator whose senate office adheres strictly to a motto of “See no Evil, Hear no Evil”; an elected official who has no record of conducting investigations into cases that are matters of great concern to her constituents and to our nation; a senator who has consistently stood quietly on the sidelines when the issues at hand demand public hearings -waiting to determine the direction of each blowing wind; a politician who has spent all her focus and energy on a campaign of shallow publicity glitz and her PR empire behind it. Here are some documented illustrative examples:
James J. DiGeorgio and Carl Steubing died in ways no war veteran should. They were subjected to illegal drug experimentation by employees of the Stratton Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Albany, New York; killed by servants of the very government they fought to protect. Scores of other veterans were injured in these experiments, and only by the courage of whistleblowers Jeffrey Fudin and Anthony Mariano was any measure of justice achieved for these misdeeds. One person was convicted of manslaughter, but investigations into other officials collapsed because of a lack of institutional nerve to follow the investigation to the end. A scape-goated employee went to prison, while those who supervised, facilitated, and reaped the benefits of the lucrative, illegal drug testing went on to other VA positions with promotions and raises.
Between 2000 and June 2006, numerous contacts with Senator Hillary Clinton over the Stratton tragedy went unacknowledged, or glossed over, or shuffled around to various offices with no substantive action. No less than five Clinton staff members heard presentations and received documentation about the experiments, and Senator Clinton herself is personally aware of the detailed facts of the case. This personal knowledge did not translate into action, for though Senator Clinton carefully scripts her numerous public appearances to give the impression of caring and concern, her actions speak otherwise. She noted “our nation made a pact with those who serve their country in the Armed Forces – a commitment that those who served would have access to quality health care through the VA hospital system . . . and they deserve to be treated as the best.” But while Senator Clinton was issuing such lofty statements and mugging for photo opportunities with active duty military, she did nothing about the systematic abuse and murder of veterans within her own constituency. The Veterans Affairs Whistleblowers Coalition, and more recently the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition, sent numerous letters and e-mails and copious documentation, pleading for help from the Senator to investigate and address the crimes committed at Stratton, including unrelenting retaliation against the whistleblowers who brought these matters to public attention
Notably, the VAWBC recognized that the motivations and incentives that led to abuse at Stratton were present at many hospitals throughout the VA system, and that greed and poor management in the VA guaranteed that the events of Stratton would be repeated elsewhere. The most vulnerable people, the sick and dying with nowhere to turn but to the VA, were exploited and killed by those tasked with their medical care, and their suffering and death were ignored by Senator Clinton. It is doubly offensive that this woman sits on the Armed Services Committee, which, along with the Veterans Affairs Committee, has the duty to provide for the well-being of current and former military service members. For all her posturing; for a senator who advertises herself as a hawk and pro military; how does she show it in action? By abandoning our veterans and war heroes in need!
Senator Clinton’s failure concerning Stratton is not an isolated event; it is part of a pattern of studious avoidance of principled action in the face of serious government misconduct, and the refusal to come to the aid of those people who expose that misconduct. When Bunnatine Greenhouse exposed extraordinary graft and impropriety in government contracting with Halliburton, when Sergeant Samuel Provance reported prisoner abuse and torture at Abu Ghraib, when Russ Tice disclosed violations of the Constitution by the National Security Agency, and when Jay Stroup, Thomas Bittler, Jim Griffin, and Ray Guagliardi exposed serious defects and negligence in the Transportation Security Administration that puts travelers at risk, Clinton did nothing. No words of support, no calls for investigations, no efforts to prevent the lives and careers of whistleblowers from being destroyed. Documents on numerous cases were shared with her office, offers to brief her and her staff have been made on many occasions, pleas for her to live up to the words she so casually utters, have all been ignored, or even ridiculed.
In her six years as senator she has done nothing but attempt to position herself for the presidency, done nothing but avoid acting out of principle and justice, done everything to offend no one. We respect our opponents in much greater measure than we respect Senator Clinton, for with our opponents at least the fight is joined; at least they have the courage of their convictions, at least they place their bets in public. But Senator Clinton, by trying to be something to everyone ends up being nothing to anyone. Where she cannot act safely, she does not act. The current times call for politicians to act with conviction and intelligence, not with cynical, calculated action in response to what opinion polls indicate. If Senator Clinton cannot even come to the aid of constituent veterans being killed through grotesquely immoral and illegal medical experimentation, if she cannot commit herself to call for investigations of national security vulnerabilities that risk national catastrophe, if she cannot offer even moral support to those who disclose outrageous government incompetence and impropriety, is there anything that would prompt her to take a stance out of conviction? Such a person has no business representing the people of this country. Nothing stirs her soul except for her own selfish ambitions; ambitions that she places in front of the nation’s welfare.
Two weeks from today, New Yorkers will cast their vote to determine their upcoming democratic candidate. We hope that they will ask themselves a few hard questions and consider their answers before they cast their vital votes. Are they among those who are tired and disgusted with the current Congress, which has abdicated its duty and responsibility to the public at large? Are they going to have “needed change and reform” in mind when voting for their next candidate? Will they vote for someone with an established record of failure? Or will they take a chance on new blood? Are they going to take into consideration this incumbent’s misuse of “national security and terrorism”? Will they reflect on her failures when presented with real issues threatening our security – brought to her by those on the front lines? Will they consider having raised more money than any other democratic candidate a plus or a minus – questioning all she had to promise and everyone she had to sell out in order to raise those millions? Will they simply ask, isn’t six years long enough? Isn’t it time for a change? Isn’t it time to give another democrat the opportunity to step up and become what we all long for – a true representative of the people?
We have confidence in the sophistication of our New Yorkers. We believe they’ll say: “Ms. Clinton, fool us once, shame on you; fool us twice shame on us.”

Posted by: conchita | Aug 28 2006 14:44 utc | 56

interesting. from gilbert achbar on the divide & rule strategy in iraq. repeats what i have been saying here for some time, though i’m more convginced now outright partition would be a mistake, strong regional autonomy could help the occupation play this neoimperial game for a gooid while longer.

Posted by: slothrop | Aug 28 2006 15:00 utc | 57

More on current desperate sitch in Gaza (from World Food Program). Isn’t the neolib economic mantra that poor countries are supposed to export their way out of misery? Well, there were no exports from Gaza in July. None.

Posted by: Dismal Science | Aug 28 2006 15:10 utc | 58

secrecynews: FISA Surveillance Can Target Non-Spies

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) can be used to monitor U.S. persons who engage in unlawful “collection or transmission of information that is not generally available to the public” even if they are not acting on behalf of a foreign power.
That is the upshot of an August 14 ruling (pdf) disclosed last week in the case of two former officials of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

By the Court’s logic, it does not take an big imaginative leap to envision the application of FISA surveillance to members of the press or others who deliberately solicit classified or controlled information or who report on classified programs in willful defiance of official directives to the contrary.
A former FBI official with extensive experience in FISA policy and practice expressed doubt that the FISA could now be easily invoked against the press or the public for ordinary reporting or research activities since, he said, these do not normally involve the requisite intent to violate the law.
“There is quite a bit on the periphery that is not included in this Order,” the official told Secrecy News.
“The judge referred to the information ‘not generally available to the public’ in the context of clandestine activities that are violations of, for example, 18 USC 793 and 794 [the Espionage Act]. These are statutes that require an intent to harm the United States or benefit another power. Judge Ellis may have been parsimonious in his words, but he hasn’t advocated the position that worries you,” he said.
Even so, the FBI FISA expert agreed that the new court order does “make it possible to be ‘an agent of a foreign power’ for FISA surveillance purposes without having any actual connection with a foreign power whatsoever.”

Posted by: b real | Aug 28 2006 15:45 utc | 59

After Greg Palast yet again shows the gentification of New, New Orleans today on Democracy Now, Interstinly enough, I ran across Executive order 12803 in which I suspect covert emanate domain powers were put in place long ago, by Poppy Bush.
There could be a thesis done on this abuse of power, with regards to modern power structure research, e.g. methodical elite systemic nepotism and it’s intracasies and nuances. How one in power can set up and stagecraft economic booty and other rewards for later acquisition either direct or indirect at the stroke of a pen.
Bertrand Russell.said it best yet very simple, and profound:”power is the ability to produce intended effects” (Russell,1938).

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 28 2006 16:51 utc | 60

After Greg Palast yet again shows the gentification of New, New Orleans today on Democracy Now, Interstinly enough, I ran across Executive order 12803 in which I suspect covert emanate domain powers were put in place long ago, by Poppy Bush.
There could be a thesis done on this abuse of power, with regards to modern power structure research, e.g. methodical elite systemic nepotism and it’s intracasies and nuances. How one in power can set up and stagecraft economic booty and other rewards for later acquisition either direct or indirect at the stroke of a pen.
Bertrand Russell.said it best yet very simple, and profound:”power is the ability to produce intended effects” (Russell,1938).

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 28 2006 16:54 utc | 61

The article linked above (Mueller in Foreign Affairs) lists all the popular explanations as to why there have not been any terrorist attacks in the US since 9/11. He leaves out the unpopular one: There are no Islamic terrorists.
Not entirely true: there are in the world some young men who are violent and jihadist-inspired. (Most of them worked for the US, in Bosnia and Afgh. for example, and stopped being violent when they were no longer paid.) As many by now know, the jihadist or Al-Q (and ‘affiliated groups’ – what vague language!) roles in both the London and the Madrid bombing are either non-existent, or tenuous, or journalistically fabricated (He is a Muslim and quite religious but a devoted schoolteacher! — hard sell…)
Genuine ‘Terrorist’ movements, non-state actors who use poor mens’ arms, are always a reaction to local occupation and oppression, or Invasion. Resistance movements, nationalist movements, splinter groups who try to effect change, ‘terrorist’ actions that remain mysterious (e.g. supermarket killings in Belgium) are all reactions to local conditions. Global ‘terrorism’ doesn’t exist; rather, I should say, did not exist in the past.
It exists today as a fabrication of the dominant powers, with multiple networks and conduits, all funded by them, to create an enemy and make people subservient, afraid, in the grip of racial hate, ready to fight, and willing to accept that nuking is the only alternative.
So far, it hasn’t worked terribly well. Hitler had an easier time of it with the Jews, as they were a group apart historically speaking, and despoiling them was financially worthwhile (local, again.) Not so with the Muslims – bashing a world religion is not PC these days – and the reason for demonising them cannot be stated so shape-shifts in strange ways, most of these contradictory to the ‘democratic’ and ‘egalitarian’, ‘non-racist’ spirit Western countries have promulgated and used both to overcome the horrors of WW2 and create an environment that was, and is, economically efficient and favorable, invisibly oppressive of people far away (new colonialism).

Posted by: Noirette | Aug 28 2006 18:45 utc | 62

narco news: Operation “Clean-Up” in Oaxaca Following the CIA’s “Psychological Operations” Manual for the Nicaraguan Contras, the State Government Has Unleashed a Bloody Counterinsurgency Strategy to Eliminate the Social Movement

Posted by: b real | Aug 28 2006 18:48 utc | 63


U.S. Aid Stirs Venezuela’s Suspicion

The U.S. government is spending millions of dollars in the name of democracy in Venezuela – bankrolling human rights seminars, training emerging leaders, advising political parties and giving to charities. But the money is raising deep suspicions among supporters of President Hugo Chavez, in part because the U.S. has refused to name many of the groups it’s supporting.
Details of the spending emerge in 1,600 pages of grant contracts obtained by The Associated Press through a Freedom of Information Act request. The U.S. Agency for International Development released copies of 132 contracts in all, but whited out the names and other identifying details of nearly half the grantees.
U.S. officials insist the aid is aboveboard and politically neutral, and say the Chavez government would harass or prosecute the grant recipients if they were identified.
Chavez, however, believes the United States is campaigning _ overtly and covertly _ to undermine his leftist government, which has crusaded against U.S. influence in Latin America and elsewhere.
“The empire pays its lackeys, and it pays them well,” he said recently, accusing some of his opponents of taking “gringo money.”
While USAID oversees much of the public U.S. spending on Latin America, President Bush’s government also has stepped up covert efforts in the region. This month, Washington named a career CIA agent as the “mission manager” to oversee U.S. intelligence on Cuba and Venezuela.

U.S. officials say they simply want to promote dialogue and strengthen Venezuela’s “fragile democratic institutions.”

Posted by: b real | Aug 28 2006 18:58 utc | 64

With regards to b real’s above…
Also see, Diplomatic pouch standoff between US and Venezuela continues

A U.S. envoy was stopped at the airport in Venezuela and charged with violation of diplomatic security because he attempted to bring in several bags loaded with ejector equipment and explosive charges. When questioned, the envoy said the ejector equipment were replacement parts for the Venezuelan air force.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 28 2006 19:16 utc | 65

As for all the airline scares, the airlines became coopted after 9/11. The Gvmt immediately stated it would pay compensation to victims, provided they signed not to sue (airlines mainly.) That was the reason, as well, for the box cutters: airlines could not be blamed for those object being on board. That is also why, since then, kooky little objects (nail scissors, etc.) are considered dangerous; that gives credibility to the first mistake, not tracking box cutters, now anything is grist for the mill. Lipstick. Baby milk.
Second, the airlines, and airports, present the no. 1. possibility for controlling anonymous crowds with authoritarian measures; traditionally the Captain is Master, and can decide as he wills. Not so in a park, on the street, in a home, where consequent legislation protects people from authoritarian intrusion.
Airport / airline security measures inure and accustom people to being in a long line, subject to a barrage of crazy questions, searches, the uncertainty of being let on or pulled aside, to the concept of ‘no fly’, ‘no pass’ lists, to utterly arbitrary measures such as pouring out their shampoo, taking off their shoes, surrounded by people with guns.
They put up with it, as they consider it an insignificant, exceptional parenthesis in their lives – it is at most a few times a year, a bit of a joke, to be put with good humor. Justified! Islamist terrorist are about, the security people are only doing their job!
(The elites have special passes and are not subject to this harassment; Morevoer, the US has an expedited Visa program which costs 10,000 dollars; necessary for the economy…)
Boats would be another example, however, very few people travel long distance by boat today, the measures would have little impact.
Going outside one’s little envelope is scary, dangerous, fraught with difficulties – that is the message. Amongst others…

Posted by: Noirette | Aug 28 2006 19:24 utc | 66

any revolution is going to have to start at the most basic level – securing our rights to growing our own food & obtaining the land on which to do so
we just took another big hit last week
engdahl: Monsanto Buys ‘Terminator’ Seeds Company

The United States Government has been financing research on a genetic engineering technology which, when commercialized, will give its owners the power to control the food seed of entire nations or regions. The Government has been working quietly on this technology since 1983. Now, the little-known company that has been working in this genetic research with the Government’s US Department of Agriculture– Delta & Pine Land– is about to become part of the world’s largest supplier of patented genetically-modified seeds (GMO), Monsanto Corporation of St. Louis, Missouri.
Relations between Monsanto, Delta & Pine Land and the USDA, on closer scrutiny, show the deep and dark side of the much-heralded genetic revolution in agriculture. It proves deep-held suspicions that the Gene Revolution is not about ‘solving the world hunger problem’ as its advocates claim. It’s about handing over control of the seeds for mankind’s basic food supply—rice, corn, soybeans, wheat, even fruit, vegetables and cotton—to privately owned corporations. Once the seeds and their use are patented and controlled by one or several private agribusiness multinationals, it will be they who can decide whether or not a particular customer—let’s say for argument, China or Brazil or India or Japan—whether they will or won’t get the patented seeds from Monsanto, or from one of its licensee GMO partners like Bayer Crop Sciences, Syngenta or DuPont’s Pioneer Hi-Bred International.

In 1983, Delta & Pine Land (D&PL) joined with the US Department of Agriculture in a project to develop Terminator seeds. It was one of the earliest experiments with GMO. It was a long-term project. The US Government has been serious about Terminator beginning more than two decades ago.
In March 1998 the US Patent Office granted Patent No. 5,723,765 to Delta & Pine Land for a patent titled, Control of Plant Gene _Expression. The patent is owned jointly, according to Delta & Pine’s Security & Exchange Commission 10K filing, ‘by D&PL and the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture.’
The patent has global coverage. To quote further from the official D&PL SEC filing, ‘The patent broadly covers all species of plant and seed, both transgenic (GMO-ed) and conventional, for a system designed to allow control of progeny seed viability without harming the crop’(sic).
Then, in a manner reminiscent of Big Brother in George Orwell’s novel, 1984, D&PL claims, ‘One application of the technology could be to control unauthorized planting of seed of proprietary varieties…by making such a practice non-economic since non-authorized saved seed will not germinate, and, therefore, would be useless for planting.’ D&PL calls the thousand-year-old tradition of farmer-saved seed by the pejorative term, ‘brown bagging’ as though it is something dirty and corrupt.
Translated into lay language, D&PL officially declares the purpose of its Patent No. 5,723,765, Control of Plant Gene _Expression, is to prevent farmers who once get trapped into buying transgenic or GMO seeds from a company such as Monsanto or Syngenta, from ‘brown bagging’ or being able to break free of control of their future crops by Monsanto and friends. As D&PL puts it, their patent gives them ‘the prospect of opening significant worldwide seed markets to the sale of transgenic technology in varietal crops in which crop seed currently is saved and used in subsequent seasons as planting seed.’
Instead, the farmer or the country whose farmers depend on Monsanto patented GMO seeds must pay a license fee to Monsanto each year to get new seeds. ‘No tickee, no laundy,’ as the old Brooklyn poet would say.
Terminator is the answer to the agribusiness dream of controlling world food production. No longer would they need to hire expensive detectives to spy on whether farmers were re-using Monsanto or other GMO patented seed. Terminator corn or soybeans or cotton seeds could be genetically modified to ‘commit suicide’ after one harvest season. That would automatically prevent farmers from saving and re-using the seed for the next harvest. The technology would be a means of enforcing Monsanto or other GMO patent rights, and forcing payment of farmer use fees not only in developing economies, where patent rights were, understandably, little respected, but also in industrial OECD countries.
With Terminator patent rights, once a country such as Argentina or Brazil or Iraq or the USA or Canada opened its doors to the spread of GMO patented seeds among its farmers, their food security would be potentially hostage to a private multinational company, a company which, for whatever reasons, especially given its intimate ties to the US Government, might decide to use ‘food as a weapon’ to compel a US-friendly policy from that country or group of countries.
Sound far-fetched? Go back to what then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger did in countries like Allende’s Chile to force a regime change to a ‘US-friendly’ Pinochet dictatorship by withholding USAID and private food exports to Chile. Kissinger dubbed it ‘food as a weapon.’ Terminator is merely the logical next step in food weapon technology.
The role of the US Government in backing and financing Delta & Pine Land’s decades of Terminator research is even more revealing. As Kissinger said back in the 1970’s, ‘Control the oil and you can control entire Continents. Control food and you control people…’

more
Monsanto Acquires Delta & Pine Land and Terminator

Posted by: b real | Aug 29 2006 2:38 utc | 67

Another view on Russian primacy in oil production and “peak oil”. Are “wacko green conservationist” ideas about to go mainstream?
The lead-in to the above link:

“According to OPEC, in June 2006 Russia extracted 9.236 million barrels of oil, which is 46,000 barrels more than Saudi Arabia. The statistics also showed that Russian production in the first half of this year increased to 235.8 million tons, a year-on-year improvement of 2.3 percent.”

I assume that most media outlets that report the captioned story by the Moscow News would describe it as good news regarding Russian oil production. What the Moscow News is not reporting is that current Russian production is 2.8% below its December level. As I outlined in a recent article regarding net oil exports, “Net Oil Exports Revisited”, I estimate that oil exports from the top 10 net oil exporters are probably now falling at a double digit annual rate. The captioned article provides additional evidence of the decline, since the June production number is below the May (EIA) production number for Russia.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Aug 29 2006 9:29 utc | 68

oil production is dropping because they can’t or won’t pump it?

Posted by: gmac | Sep 5 2006 21:52 utc | 69