Billmon:
It’s the rare supertanker that has the brass (or the bilge water) to begin an op-ed in the Washington Post with such a blatant, obscene lie …
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
August 17, 2006
WB: False Labor
Billmon:
Comments
Good Job! You nailed Drive-By Rice’s hide to the wall. Nice trophy. Posted by: Diogenes | Aug 17 2006 19:26 utc | 1 Sometimes Godwin’s Law proves itself a necessity: Posted by: Aigin | Aug 17 2006 20:08 utc | 2 Perhaps she means that goading Israel to kill anyone who had not fled South Lebanon was their idea of how to “end the violence that Hezbollah and its sponsors have imposed on the people of Lebanon and Israel.”? Posted by: YouFascinateMe | Aug 17 2006 20:45 utc | 3 Rice isn’t the most popular among the neocon psychos like Perle and Kristol, so she and Bush have to make tough to placate those psychos. Bush so far as to proclaim victory on behalf of Israel. Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Aug 17 2006 22:24 utc | 4 Bush so far as to proclaim victory on behalf of Israel. Posted by: BGea | Aug 17 2006 22:38 utc | 5 My point is that his pronouncement of Israeli victory was political, aimed at the neocons and their constituents. My opinion is that he knows very well what happened. Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Aug 17 2006 22:55 utc | 6
If Bush was president as the last helicopter was taking off from the roof of the Saigon embassy, he’d make a speech congratulating the Vietnamese people for finally “standing up as we stand down”. Posted by: Jimmy Jazz | Aug 17 2006 23:37 utc | 7 That Condi is quite a piece of work, yet she is hated by the True Belivers. I think it’s just the job. They have to hate anyone that is associated with diplomacy, no matter how fleetingly, like Condi. Anyway, not to figure her out? Does she ever open her mouth and not lie? Who can forget the Al Queda breifing paper? OK, almost everyone but the testemony about it was so over the top that BS doesn’t begin to describe the dishonesty. Where does such come from? I am at a loss to explain it. Posted by: rapier | Aug 18 2006 0:44 utc | 8 Poor Condi. Posted by: PD | Aug 18 2006 2:04 utc | 9 Now it all makes sense. Posted by: jony_b_cool | Aug 18 2006 2:36 utc | 10 I’m for dropping this entire administration in South Lebanon and letting them deal with Hezbollah directly…. Thras… Posted by: John Francis Lee | Aug 18 2006 4:22 utc | 12 Well, it’s not as if Bush has that many allies left, (xcept maybe Howard Kurtz and Joe Lieberman). And wasn’t Perle ripping Rice for not bombing Iran a couple of weeks ago? Bush is throwing them a bone, but of course, they won’t be happy till they get the real neocon deal with McCain. And till they do, perhaps they’ll have to be content with the occasional rhetorical dog biscuit. Posted by: Thrasyboulos | Aug 18 2006 4:35 utc | 13 Condi is the perfect Secretary of State for the administration. She’s willing to play the fool for those with half a brain or more, and the lighting rod for the bullshit artists for the brain-dead. In her role as a homely, apparently sexless clotheshorse, she can shuttle at her master’s whim to befuddle the poor diplomats who are forced to waste time with her. Meanwhile Bolton is off threatening and blustering to give the real message, “Fuck you, bitches, we do what we want.” Posted by: Dick Durata | Aug 18 2006 4:54 utc | 14 Probe suggests Marines hid Haditha evidence: NYT Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 18 2006 17:30 utc | 15 opps, I posted that (#15) in the wrong thread sorry… Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 18 2006 17:32 utc | 16 Only a social revolution could remove the prevailing class structure and the conflict engenders. The point is the traditional class struggle ceases to have revolutionary implications; it reveals itself as the physiology of the prevailing society, not as the labor pains of birth. In fact the traditional class struggle stabilizes capitalist society by “correcting” its abuses. – Bookchin channeling Marx Posted by: Malooga | Aug 18 2006 19:26 utc | 17 Speaking of traditional class struggles and structure…
Even more infuriating, when attourneys and judges get together in the judges private chamber, they often cut deals that are essentially “off the record”. All kinds of agrements can be made and there sometimes there is no court reporter to witness it. Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 18 2006 19:44 utc | 18 Damn, U$, sometimes I think you sit there with a hatful of incredible links and just pull them out at the right time, easy as shootin’ rats at the dump! Posted by: Malooga | Aug 18 2006 19:57 utc | 19 Preumably this would also be affecting the legal profession’s understanding of US case law. If you can’t research/access all the cases, you really don’t know what you’re talking about in case law. Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 18 2006 20:05 utc | 20 Uncle $cam, I never heard of such an affair with so MANY invisible court cases. I am going to ask a couple of people whether they know of any similar occurences in Canada. Posted by: Owl | Aug 19 2006 8:41 utc | 21 Wait! there’s more… Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 19 2006 9:51 utc | 22 “Revenge is not justice.” Posted by: Monolycus | Aug 19 2006 10:30 utc | 23 Welcome to The Great Judeo-Christian Sin, Outlaw, Guilt, Crime & Punishment T.V. Show Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 19 2006 11:09 utc | 24 |
||