Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 30, 2006
Breaking Levees

A year ago Billmon wrote: When the Levee Breaks

As a living, functioning city, then, New Orleans has ceased to exist. Even if it can eventually be resuscitated, the patient’s long-term prognosis is grim. Just as yesterday was a catastrophe in slow motion, the future of the Crescent City is likely to be a slow, lingering death by drowning: the environmental equivalent of pulmonary edema. In that sense, New Orleans is the canary — peacock might be the more appropriate bird — in the mine of global climate change. If melting ice caps continue to push sea levels rapidly higher, its death may also await many of the world’s other low-lying cities.

The death will not only come to such cities.

Global warming will induce huge migration waves away from the low-lying coasts and new deserts. For Katrina refugees the experience and situation is sad and uprooting. But there are means for them to survive without violence. The conflict for and over Katrina refugees is a soft one.

The skirmishes resulting from desertification in Darfur are deadly. A one meter rise in sea levels will result in a loss of 16% of land, densely populated, in Bangladesh. Whereto will those people flee? Throughout this century hundreds of millions will have find new homes.

The levees the U.S., the EU and others are building on their boarders will break when that wave arrives. Populists will declare this new migration period to be an invasion of barbarians and the fighting will be fierce, deadly and on a very large scale.

Comments

Ladies and Gentlemen,
once again it is Apocalypse Wednesday…

Posted by: Guthman Bey | Aug 30 2006 11:10 utc | 1

The Pentagon has previously reported that global warming — and the massive population shifts out of Latin America that it will cause — as America’s number one strategic threat in this century.
The plan, of which NAFTA and CAFTA are but the opening moves, is to integrate Canada, the US, and Mexico into an integrated economic region, sharing a single currency (the Amero), and common constitutional frameworks.
In the halls of power in Washington, this is all being discussed as a bright and shining bit of progress for all three countries, and the world, and for both political parties, by both political parties. Visit SPP.GOV for progress reports.
The Canadian and Mexican governments both have SPP offices working with the US office, integrating dozens of aspects of the three countries’ infrastructure, from aviation to transportation, e-commerce, currency, and so on.
Congress has not been notified, nor informed, nor asked to comment.
Behind the bright, shining lie is a military reality — we cannot defend the current Mexican border from many millions of Latinos surging northwards. We CAN defend the narrower slice of Mexico where it meets Guatemala. That can be turned into a No Man’s Land that no human being, or rodent, can cross and survive.
Life can return to the Stone Age south of the North American Union. North of No Man’s Land, we can continue to watch TV and shop at the mall, from Chiapas to Churchill Bay.
Which leaves the Atlantic, the Pacific, and North Pole to defend against incoming population bombs, aka immigrants. Those regions are all highly susceptible to radar and sonar, and more easily defended.
Among the obstacles to this North American Union is the US Constitution. It will have to be watered down a good bit to allow for the kind of policing that has to happen if the wealthy elites are to have a happy hunting ground where they can continue to raise and harvest their favorite food, the SLC (Semi-Literate Consumer).

Posted by: Antifa | Aug 30 2006 11:42 utc | 2

Antifa,
there will be no stopping the immigrants, even with a mine field the size of Guatemala. They will slip through in submarines, bail out of low-flying aircraft or cross over the re-exposed land bridge from Siberia.
And the rich elites will do little to stop the flow of cheap labor and potential new SLC’s flooding to the land(s) of the free and the homes of the brave new world.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 30 2006 12:53 utc | 3

Also there are the many invaders from Outta Space, who are posing as immigrants from France

Posted by: Guthman Bey | Aug 30 2006 13:29 utc | 4

Let’s put it this way: men make history but it is not the history they want. Was it Karl Marx that said that?

Posted by: jlcg | Aug 30 2006 14:12 utc | 5

jlcg,
I remember Donald Rumsfeld stating that “You go to war with the army you have, not the army you want.” I wonder if that applies to ethnobiological population warfare.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 30 2006 14:42 utc | 6

Speaking of the peacock, the myth is said that a peacock gets it beautiful colors by ingesting poison…(the ones who survive)
Comment period closed; feds preparing to spray fruits, vegetables in commerce with fluorine-based pesticide

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 30 2006 15:59 utc | 7

@ Uncle Scam,
usually I lean a lot from your links but this one… seems really odd.
do you ascribe to this floride-to-control-the-mases theory? [or perhaps I missed your point: are you ridiculing it?]
it seems to me that placing a chemical that is assumed to eat holes in the brains could also induce psychosis or rage or other unforeseen results besides compliance. Not a good way to control the masses.
If this 50’s era conspiracy theory were true, then it would follow that nobody who had ever drank fluoridated water has ever questioned authority. I am sure this does not reflect reality. Plenty of fluoride drinkers have and do question authority.

Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 30 2006 16:23 utc | 8

The point is, gylangirl, agrobusiness, has done nothing but poison agriculture from the begining, and they do it with indifference as long as there is $$ involved. Archer Daniels Midland Company, has no ethics other than stockholder $$, if it happens to posion everyone, it’s exceptable.
Control the food/water, you control the population.
On a related note: Junkfood and Criminality

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 30 2006 16:45 utc | 9

re fluoride, there was a democracynow broadcast two years back which featured a study that validated some of the concerns w/ fluoride, along w/ the fact that it is a way to get rid of a nuclear waste byproduct. bernays plays a role too.
democracynow: The Fluoride Deception: How a Nuclear Waste Byproduct Made Its Way Into the Nation’s Drinking Water

Posted by: b real | Aug 30 2006 16:47 utc | 10

re levees essay and canaries
I am reminded of an acquaintance who regularly powerboats on the Chesapeake Bay. Recent sewage pollution; and beach closures; and poor water quality observable from the boat have prompted this boater to decide to sell the marina slip, and go boating in a [supposedly] cleaner bay 100 miles away.
I suspect that waterfront property will again return to its 17th century [very undesirable] status once the water levels rise enough to spread industrial and sewage filth along coastlines.

Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 30 2006 16:48 utc | 11

re fluoride
yes I think profit is rather the point, Uncle Scam, not mind control.

Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 30 2006 16:50 utc | 12

Antifa wrote: The plan, of which NAFTA and CAFTA are but the opening moves, is to integrate Canada, the US, and Mexico into an integrated economic region, sharing a single currency (the Amero), and common constitutional frameworks.
Yes. That is why the feeble or burgeoning – c’est selon – opposition in Mexico is interesting.
The Constitution is a faded, curling photocopy, of historical interest. Congress is there to do the talking-heads stuff and make people feel good.
Immigrants. When a country decides to import, or allow, cheap or slave labor, at home or abroad, it will do so. Upright citizens who complain of lost jobs, noxious fumes from HOT bbq, the strain on social services, the over running of parks, and so on, are hypocritical assholes. They live off those people and couldn’t bear to see the status quo change.

Posted by: Noirette | Aug 30 2006 17:11 utc | 13

Depends on your definition of “mind control” gylangirl…

Posted by: Anonymous | Aug 30 2006 17:14 utc | 14

Opps, me above…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 30 2006 17:18 utc | 15

Let’s put it this way: men make history but it is not the history they want. Was it Karl Marx that said that?
“Men make history, but not in circumstances of their own making.” It was in The German Ideology. Or maybe it was the Grundrisse. It’s been a while.

Posted by: billmon | Aug 30 2006 18:10 utc | 16

Mind control was defined in the linked article, Uncle Scam. By that definition, the fluoride conspiracy theory is load of bunk.

Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 30 2006 18:17 utc | 17

Katrina in New Orleans was a little Iraq.

Posted by: Noirette | Aug 30 2006 18:55 utc | 18

Was Katrina America’s Chernobyl? Is Iraq America’s Afghanistan? Is the U.S. going the way of the Soviet Union?

Posted by: lysias | Aug 30 2006 20:44 utc | 19

Those who argue against the use of fluoride in water remind me of the god botherers who try to convince the herd that abortion and contraception are injurious to women’s health, but forget to mention the far higher rates of disease and death that occur in pregnant women than happen when performing a D&C or even from using IUD’s.
When conspiracists decry the use of fluoride in water and drag out the statistics on alleged damage from over ingestion, the one thing they don’t discuss is the much higher and far more death dealing illnesses, that are a direct result of caries, or tooth decay.
For instance as the abstract from this paper from the Entrez PubMed site shows some 25% more coronary disease was observed in subjects with dental decay than those who were free of tooth and gum infections:

“RESULTS–Among all 9760 subjects included in the analysis those with periodontitis had a 25% increased risk of coronary heart disease relative to those with minimal periodontal disease. Poor oral hygiene, determined by the extent of dental debris and calculus, was also associated with an increased incidence of coronary heart disease. In men younger than 50 years at baseline periodontal disease was a stronger risk factor for coronary heart disease; men with periodontitis had a relative risk of 1.72. Both periodontal disease and poor oral hygiene showed stronger associations with total mortality than with coronary heart disease. CONCLUSION–Dental disease is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease, particularly in young men. Whether this is a causal association is unclear. Dental health may be a more general indicator of personal hygiene and possibly health care practices.”

This paper was the first Google took me to and since Google somehow manages to find mainstream US research we are left with the impression that there may a serendipitous relationship between heart disease and tooth decay rather than a causal one. That is people who are too lazy to clean their teeth are probably not very health conscious in other areas and that behaviour could be the reason for the higher incidence.
Now if that were so we should ask, what other types of disease are also prevalent in individuals with chronic periodontal disease. If this is just an unhappy coincidence then surely other types of disease will also be represented disproportionately amongst those with tooth decay.
AFAIK coronary disease is the only large scale consistent parallel diagnosis. So maybe the relationship is causal.
This paper presented by University of Greifswald researchers to a San Diego conference on the Cardiovascular aspects of Periodontal Medicine in 2002 confirms Australasian research which I have previously come across, in that it argues that chronic infections require the blood to carry a much higher number of white corpuscles (ie white cells, the good guys which fight infections).
The high white blood cell count places increases strain upon the heart which is then reflected in a higher rate of coronary disease in younger people, particularly males.
Many well educated middle class people can be persuaded into thinking that tooth decay is an indication of various behavioural defects from poor hygiene to laziness to drug addiction but these diseases have far more complex origins.
I think I have posted before on things that hit me like a belt upside the head from an irate significant other when I assisted a mate set up an emergency dental clinic in a particularly low socio-economic area of Auckland NZ.
It sort of distracts you from installing software or testing notworks when sharing a space with a 2 or 3 year old child whose mouth is a mass of blackened, broken teeth and pus while dentists endeavour to clean it up. That usually means extracting all the teeth, then trusting that the information about to be given to the child’s parents, often through an interpreter will be heeded when ‘gappy’ gets his or her second set of choppers in a few years.
The family will have been practicing the oral hygiene that stood them in good stead as well their forbears for generations before.
Unfortunately when dealing with highly processed western food the ‘window of opportunity’ before the mixture of ‘weaponised’ sugars and carbos begin assisting in the proliferation of the bacteria which are responsible for tooth decay is really minutes not hours or days. That is; after eating a McDonalds, or Betty Crocker or a Oreo one really needs to leap from the table and get scrubbing and flossing immediately.
Fluoride which protects against decay by attacking the acids in plaque which initiate tooth decay, is a particularly effective way of aiding the fight against this killer which targets those unable to fight for themselves, ie young children from low-socio economic backgrounds.
It really is annoying to see the selfish and counter productive arguments against it’s widespread addition to local water supplies get traction with vote hungry politicians.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Aug 30 2006 21:37 utc | 20

how about not inflicting the highly processed (toxic) western corporate crap food in the first place?
just a thought.

Posted by: DeAnander | Aug 30 2006 22:52 utc | 21

@Antifa
“Lovelinesses.”

Posted by: Argh | Aug 30 2006 23:21 utc | 22

Greg Palast was on the Randi Rhodes show yesterday (although Randi is on vacation, so there was a substitute host.) Palast said a hurricane expert at some university in Louisiana told him that the White House knew on the Monday Katrina hit that there were breaches in the levees, and deliberately did not inform the state and local authorities, as breaches in the levees would mean it had become a federal responsibility. Sounded like that was a White House (Bush?) decision.

Posted by: lysias | Aug 30 2006 23:30 utc | 23

Pop goes the Bubble?
speaking of Apocalypse Wednesday (Monday, Tuesday, Doomsday…) — Mike Whitney offering a kind of grim Schadenfreude over the US real estate bubble’s rapid deflation. not good news for me personally, if true. or for any other imminently-retiring person whose residence is their nest egg.
damn, if only I coulda sold the property 2 years ago… seems to me some other Lunatic of Alabama is in a similar fix — Gaianne is it? or gylangirl?

Posted by: DeAnander | Aug 31 2006 0:18 utc | 24

The scientist is Ivor van Heerden, whose book The Storm is marvelous; the claim is that FEMA knew of the levee breach at 11 AM Monday and that FEMA flew over one of the broken levees at 2 PM, ie, a full day before FEMA allegedly knew about the breaches (and a couple of hours before the idiot in the home office decided that the levees were fine because people were partying on Bourbon St.).

Posted by: Brian Boru | Aug 31 2006 3:33 utc | 25

Katrina: Money for Nothing
The United States received hundreds of millions in foreign aid last year, after Hurricane Katrina devastated the Gulf Coast. But what happened to the money?
This just burns me up!

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Aug 31 2006 4:45 utc | 26

“I can’t believe [the money] is still sitting there” says one foreign diplomatic official who worked on relief efforts in New Orleans shortly after Katrina. “Countries gave that money, wanting it to help people affected by the hurricane. It’s a shame.” A smarter approach, perhaps, would have been to bypass the federal government altogether. That’s what Qatar did in May when it granted $60 million directly to New Orleans universities, hospitals, and charities.

U$,
more grist for the Bookchin thread. The national government is basically promising to continue abandoning all but the well-to-do, and if locales want to insure themselves as a community, the threat of increasingly violent storm patterns (and increasingly high seas) may virtually force us into constituting ourselves as political communities.
The alternative is that every disaster simply raises the profits of Halliburton/Blackwater/Bechtel and creates new economic disaster areas from whence that profit arises. Red in tooth and claw, these policies. Which reminds me of a painter friend:
I asked him how one actually gets good at painting, and he told me that it was something you learned day to day, from ordinary experience, like, for example, learning to paint green leaves.
If you try to paint from what you think is green, using yellows and blues, somehow the greens never quite look like what leaves should. But if you watch the leaves long enough, you realize in the Fall that they are filled with blood red. And so you have to go to the red on your palette and put in the blood, or it’s not really the right green. State/Business profits are the same way, if you don’t add in the blood red, you can never quite get the color just, so.

Posted by: citizen | Aug 31 2006 15:35 utc | 27

@ DeAnander,
Yup, we should’ve sold last spring. We have lost at least 70k in equity in less than a year. And it’s still dropping.
I like the article you linked, especially this part explaining how folks were able to afford higher priced houses, not based on their combined incomes but based on their higher debt:
Secondly, the Fed knew that wages had actually regressed (2.3%) since Bush took office, so they knew that the soaring value of real estate was entirely predicated on debt not real wealth. In other words, home values increased because of the availability of cheap money which inevitably creates a buying-frenzy. It had nothing to do with real demand or growth in wages.

Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 31 2006 16:22 utc | 28

OTOH, DeAnander, if the dollar is gonna deflate too, maybe selling would have lost us our shirts in the long run anyway.

Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 31 2006 16:41 utc | 29

Whatever happened to that old truly conservative American dream of paying off your 30-year mortgage (maybe even paying down the principle along the way to reduce the interest) and living in your nest-egg (oops, nest)?

Posted by: catlady | Aug 31 2006 17:16 utc | 30

@ catlady – A few minutes ago I was going to say that I plan to pull my little bungalow down on my head when I die. [changed my mind but you changed it back 😉 ]

Posted by: beq | Aug 31 2006 17:28 utc | 31

That’s our plan catlady. Except we have a 15 year fixed rate mortgage we plan to pay off within the next 4 years and we have no intentions of ever moving.
At that point I’d be 48, my wife 43.
Then, with only taxes, maintenance, and the normal overhead, we’d like to purposely reduce our income in order to send alot less to our loathsome federal government to fund their despicable wars.

Posted by: ran | Aug 31 2006 17:43 utc | 32

@ catlady,
They don’t call them starter homes for nothing. People expect to outgrow their first home.
Also, it’s a mobile society for many reasons; not the least of which is unreliable job security. Todays new homeowners starting out know that they will move to wherever they land the next job. Even retirees move to where the cost of living meets their fixed incomes. Living in the same house for thirty years? We should be so lucky.

Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 31 2006 17:48 utc | 33

It was 28 for me last April!

Posted by: beq | Aug 31 2006 18:07 utc | 34

Congrats beq. Self-employed?

Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 31 2006 18:12 utc | 35

No.

Posted by: beq | Aug 31 2006 18:18 utc | 36

Europeans still build houses with a view of their great-grandchildren still living in them. Partly because they are less mobile at heart (most of the peripatetic types among them left for the New World ages ago) and partly because they tend to look at a house as a home and not just a “housing unit”.
A buddy of mine near Hannover lives in a farmhouse that was built in 1803. He said it is the fifth house that their family built on the site. Every couple of centuries they would take the old house down and build a new one, re-using as much of the materials as they could.
Means that I was bumping my head on low-hanging beams that could be nearly 1,000 years old.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Aug 31 2006 18:39 utc | 37

@ralphieboy,
Yeah, some of my relatives have the same farm house histories in the old country. But here in the new country, constuction ain’t like it used to be. It’s a throw-away society. How else can developers and manufacturers make such big profits?
And because it got that way because of cheap oil, and because the old country has become more cheap oil dependent than ever, lately the old country is becoming more wasteful and more mobile too.

Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 31 2006 19:14 utc | 38

@beq,
Congrats to your employer then too.

Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 31 2006 19:16 utc | 39

@catlady well, as a non-US-citizen I now have all the civil rights of slime mold. so I’m trying to leave the country, and selling the house was my idea of starter funding for the new life. however BushCo has not only made the US a very dangerous place for me to live — their looting of the economy (not just BushCo but the last 30 years and more of finance capitalist skulduggerers) is destroying the means of escape and resettlement. I think I am perhaps approaching the “cut yer losses and run” moment.

Posted by: DeAnander | Aug 31 2006 19:23 utc | 40

DeAnander,
I can relate to all that. And I am a citizen FWIW anymore.

Posted by: gylangirl | Aug 31 2006 20:08 utc | 41

@ gylangirl. Mind I don’t have a career, just a steady (so far) job. It’s the art that fulfills.
DeAnander – write us a “how to” when you make it.

Posted by: beq | Sep 1 2006 2:29 utc | 42

as a non-US-citizen I now have all the civil rights of slime mold
So tell us DeA- my dear, just why you think you should have more civil rights than the rest of us slime molds around this decaying heap?? 🙂

Posted by: jj | Sep 1 2006 6:51 utc | 43

The substitute host for Randi Rhodes was Mike Malloy. The day after Greg Palast was interviewed on his show, Malloy was suddenly fired by Air America.

Posted by: lysias | Sep 1 2006 18:03 utc | 44

The Katrina disaster was pre-ordained. The confluence of wet lands (marsh lands, I’m not sure of the term) and consequent human interference; the presence of extractive and and very heavy industry and transport (oil) on a sea board that is vulnerable, etc.
Second, a large human-inhabited area that is under sea level, inhabited largely by poor people, the result of the growth of a city established long ago in a spot that was favorable then.
Third, no proper management or protection, everyone knew NO could be swamped. Those levees look like children’s fences, compared to what you see elsewhere. This came about because Louisiana is disadvantaged politically and financially in various ways (that would be an interesting essay to write, I’m not capable…), and its political class was always at a disadvantage and obliged to suck up to the PTB. Nagin, the mayor, was mayor because he got in tight with the business / white community … one can hardly blame him for it, him or someone else like him; others of a different stripe would not have been elected.
The insecurity of the geographical situation, the poverty (and blackness) of the people living there, a general feeling that this situation was no longer tenable, coupled with the your on yer own Bush and Co. philosophy, adjusted to various aims, -Florida has a different picture- did the rest. The FEMA authoritarian incompetents found their heaven, polishing it off.

Posted by: Noirette | Sep 2 2006 16:03 utc | 45

In “The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte,” the quote appears as

Man make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from the past.”

It continues

The tradition of all the dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living.

Posted by: pseudonymous | Sep 4 2006 21:05 utc | 46