Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
July 16, 2006
The Election

by conchita

I was in Mexico during the last election, the one in 2000 when Vicente Fox, the PAN candidate, shocked the nation by defeating Ernesto Zedillo and, more importantly, the PRI party which had been in control of Mexican politics for nearly 90 years.   

The night Ernesto Zedillo conceded to Fox, the sleepy coastal town where I was staying sprang to life with a night-long, raucous procession of cars and trucks circling the Zocalo – horns honking, passengers cheering – nearly all sporting enormous blue and white PAN banners, some even spray painted blue.  It was a vibrant display of joyous and incredulous bravado celebrating liberation from the corruption that had dominated electoral politics for nearly a century. I watched from my hotel balcony above the Zocalo eager to head down to join in the festivities, but my Mexican boyfriend at the time, a local, cautioned  “no, it would be too dangerous.”  He found it difficult to believe that Fox had truly won, that PRI had allowed an accurate vote count, and feared reprisals from the area’s PRI party.  Even after we watched the election results  and saw Zedillo’s concession speech on television Martin was reluctant to join the revelers. I thought how strange and how sad and how – that would never happen in the U.S. 

Other Mexican friends responded differently.  Gil, mi mejor amigo, celebrated with Mezcal and used the election as an excuse to stay drunk for two days.  When he emerged from the Mezcal haze he was all smiles and told me how this meant that the Mexican people had taken back their country.  Conchita, the dueña of the bed and breakfast where I stayed in Oaxaca was ecstatic.  She had created a shrine around a photo of Fox and lit a candle each day in the months prior to the election.  William, her son-in-law, was more sanguine, warning against expecting too much of Fox – how much could he realistically be expected to accomplish after decades of PRI control?  Fox had traveled the countryside campaigning, and Mexicans in general, for the first time that many could remember, were optimistic that they had finally been listened to, their concerns would be addressed, and Fox would not turn out to be just another politician making empty promises.  Even if PAN was a conservative party, the fact that PRI had been defeated spoke volumes for them.

I could not help but compare this Mexican election experience with elections in the U.S. Call it  naievete, but I felt certain that this could never happen in the U.S. – that the country could fall under the extended control of one party.  Yes, I know we essentially have that now, but in 2000, I was one of those who was foolish enough to want to believe W might be a compassionate conservative.  While I wasn’t ready to accept he had truly won the election without a bonafide Florida recount, I saw Al Gore as taking the high road when he accepted the SCOTUS decision.  I thought “we’ll take it back in 2004, it’s only four years.”  Never did I dream that the US and Mexico would converge in 2004 and 2006 in a place where corrupt electoral politics are the norm.   

I treasured the opportunity to have been a part of that landmark election in Mexico.  I hoped for the best for the country and even wore the experience as a badge of honor of sorts.  In early 2003 when part of a MoveOn group meeting with representatives of the Mexican Mission to the U.N. to urge the Mexican government not to support the U.S. invasion of Iran, I referred to having been in Mexico on the 2000 election, remembered how much it meant to my Mexican friends then to think that Fox had listened to them, and how I hoped now that he would listen again, this time to the citizens of the world who protested the possibility of an illegal and unjust war.  The fact that twenty of us were seated in a conference room speaking with the Mexican government gave me hope that as Fox, through his representatives, was listening to the people, so would Bush.  When we gathered weeks later in the streets of New York and cities throughout the world I never dreamed we would not be heard.  I never dreamed that over 500,000 voices in the streets of New York, over 10,000,000 throughout the world, would be ignored by the U.S. government.   Now it seems that the Mexican government, intransigent in its refusal to recount last week’s presidential vote, would like to disregard the 100,000 who raised their voices in the Zocalo last Saturday in support of Lopez Obrador. 

Mexico and the U.S. have converged in a dismal place where citizens of both countries cannot be assured of free, verifiable, transparent elections.  However, the Mexican people, perhaps because of their history are passionately resisting.  Sadly, north of the border we have seen two fraudulent elections with barely a protest.  Those of us who did protest were dismissed as conspiracy theorists and sore losers.  John Kerry, stating he was not able to prove fraud, conceded the election and the country wanted to move on.  Lopez Obrador has cases of evidence supporting the allegation of election theft and with his supporters – which is at least half of the country – will challenge the results in court.  Mexicans are amassing from all over the country to peacefully protest; two million are expected to arrive in Mexico City this weekend in support of his fight and in support of democracy.  It is my fervent hope that, like Chavez, he and the campañeros will succeed in throwing off the yoke of U.S. interference and defeat corruption.

The Mexicano in this photograph left his country twelve years ago, scaling a fence and scrambling through a no man’s land in the dark of night, to arrive in a country where he hoped for a second chance at life, but where instead he was treated like a second class citizen.  Now a "legal alien" he wonders if he might be better off returning home where freedom fighters like Emilio Zapata and Manuel Andres Lopez Obrador are national heroes.  This image we created together is about the quiet despair we both feel living in America* today. 

*Note for clarification and with respect for the non-U.S. Americans:  America, as my Mexican friends taught me, encompasses more than just the U.S.

Comments

a beautiful, sombre & tender work

Posted by: r’giap | Jul 16 2006 1:26 utc | 1

seems aware at the same time the usual humiliations of victory.
humbling, conchita. thanx

Posted by: slothrop | Jul 16 2006 1:34 utc | 2

Viva Villa!
Viva Zapata!
Except for a brief period in the 1930s, under Lazaro Cardenas, the PRI has been one of the most corrupt, nepotistic, cronyist, governments in the hemisphere.
Great write, Conchita!

Posted by: Ambrose Bierce | Jul 16 2006 2:07 utc | 3

thanks for the comments, guys. seems a bit inconsequential in the face of what is going on in the middle east, but i wrote it earlier in the week after looking at one of b real’s links. for those who want a break from cauldron in the middle east, greg palast has been writing some good stuff. haven’t seen any coverage of the march happening in mexico city this weekend yet, but the tribunal has begun to consider lopez obrador’s 900 case loads of evidence.

Posted by: conchita | Jul 16 2006 2:28 utc | 4

Greg Palast is cool.
My question for Al Gore:
Dear Al:
In 2000 you were in Florida to see one of the most open violations of civil rights in the US since the 1960s. Tens of thousands of African-Americans had their votes suppressed. And you didn’t say a damn word. You acted like it was all about you. Are you a coward or what?

Posted by: citizen k | Jul 16 2006 2:57 utc | 5

In any case, Chonchita, I don’t believe that Mexico and Iraq /ME is unrelated. George Bush will be hailed in future generations as another Simon Bolivar. The Liberator Bush so damaged the power and strength of the USA that Latin America escaped.

Posted by: citizen k | Jul 16 2006 2:59 utc | 6

citizen k, i hope you are right – what sweet irony that would be.
also meant to say 900 page legal challenge above, not 900 case loads. time to call it quits for the day.

Posted by: conchita | Jul 16 2006 3:14 utc | 7

Dearest conchita,
I, for one, very much wanted a break from middle eastern news and was fascinated and moved by this piece. It sent me on many google avenues to better understand..I learned so much, Thank you for that!

Posted by: Amurra | Jul 16 2006 3:32 utc | 8

great post and photograph, Conchita.

Posted by: fauxreal | Jul 16 2006 5:16 utc | 9

the 100,000 who raised their voices in the Zocalo last Saturday in support of Lopez Obrador
there was definitely more than 100,000 people in those photos. estimates i heard ranged from 300,000 to half a mill. otherwise, nice essay conchita.

Posted by: b real | Jul 16 2006 7:05 utc | 10

Conchita,
Glad you brought this to our attention, a bigger story than I was aware of, in that:
from Narco News story….
Many observers have compared the post-electoral conflict in Mexico 2006 to that of 2000 in the United States. While there are indeed parallels (as well as distinctions) to be drawn, there is a very important difference in the equation, and it is societal: That part of the electorate in the United States that was robbed did not see any way to fight and overturn the fraud, or simply was too gullible or afraid to do so. In Mexico, however, the path exists, a critical mass of the Mexican populace understands exactly what was done to them and is ready to assume the ultimate risks to overturn the crime. At stake for global capital and its increasingly simulated “election” processes not just in Mexico but throughout the planet is the manufactured belief that nothing can be done. As occurred a century ago, with the Mexican revolution of 1910, Mexico is on the verge of, as Zapatista Subcomandante Marcos has often said, “amazing the world again.”

Posted by: anna missed | Jul 16 2006 8:12 utc | 11

Let’s be precise. Vicente Fox did not run against Zedillo because Zedillo was president and if there is something sacred in Mexico is that presidents are nor reelected. The other sacred thing is that bullfights begin at 16:00 exactly

Posted by: jlcg | Jul 16 2006 10:01 utc | 12

A friends wife hails from Mexico City. I sent her a link to a story that challenged the truthiness of the latest election. She would have none of that, assuring me electoral fraud was nearly impossible and that Obrador was even more stupid than Chavez. I think she’s happy with the result. 😉

Posted by: gmac | Jul 16 2006 11:17 utc | 13

I’m overwhelmed by everything. Thank you, conchita for taking the time to create this for us. Our community is the whole world.
Thank you.

Posted by: beq | Jul 16 2006 12:32 utc | 14

gmac, i think your friend’s wife must be drinking tequila not mezcal. 😉 not to burst her bubbble, but you might want to forward this article in the sf chronicle which explains the history of and the challenge facing the electoral tribunal in mexico.

It is 10 years since the tribunal was created to police an electoral system long plagued by blatant fraud. In that time, the tribunal has nullified 17 local, state and congressional elections and ruled against each of Mexico’s three major parties in roughly equal proportions…(snip)…

Posted by: conchita | Jul 16 2006 15:56 utc | 15

anna missed, thanks for the narconews link. great info there.
b real, could have been over 100,000, probably was. of course, the nypd always downplays the number of protesters and present a number about 2/3 the estimate of the organizers, so 300,000 would make sense. i wondered about the number as i typed it but it was the estimate i read. i also gave some thought to the size of the zocalo – it’s large but not enormous – and while the crowds certainly must have spilled out into the streets, i thought 100,000 would have certainly have filled it as shown in the photos of your link.

Posted by: conchita | Jul 16 2006 16:03 utc | 16

jclg, feeling a bit dense this morning, would you mind explaining your comment about fox and why he ran?

Posted by: conchita | Jul 16 2006 16:05 utc | 17

Conchita
from Wikipedia
The July 2, 2000, elections marked the first time since the 1910-17 Mexican Revolution that the opposition defeated the party in government. Vicente Fox won the election with 43% of the vote, followed by PRI candidate Francisco Labastida with 36%, and Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas of the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) with 17%.
I believe jclg is saying that Fox did not run against Zedillo but against the gentlemen listed above.

Posted by: dan of steele | Jul 16 2006 16:51 utc | 18

thanks, dan of steele, i stand very corrected.

Posted by: conchita | Jul 16 2006 17:05 utc | 19

Today In History
“In 1927 the small town of Ocotal, Nicaragua, had the distinction of becoming the first victim of collective aerial bombing in the history of warfare. Over 300 villagers were killed by this US military action.”
source
Thanks conchita and the rest of the gang…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 16 2006 17:50 utc | 20

Uncle: I am pretty sure the Brits bombed villages in Iraq in the early 1920s.

Posted by: citizen k | Jul 16 2006 17:59 utc | 21

Thanks, conchita, for the link. I’ll include it in my response. I’m not sure she read the one I sent her, as it delved a little into Mexico’s colourful electoral past

Posted by: gmac | Jul 16 2006 18:02 utc | 22

citizen k, this seems to back you up

The blinding hubris was shattered when, in July 1920, the Iraqi people revolted

Winston Churchill, Minister of the Colonies, ordered the use of poison-gas and fierce aerial bombardment to stop the uprising. Thousands of men, women and children were killed, whilst Churchill charged his critics as men who “don’t think clearly” and that he had no issue “using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes”. Arthur “Bomber” Harris, the British air-force hero, oversaw the bombing campaign, gloating in his diary, “the Arab and the Kurd now know what real bombing means in casualties and damage. Within 45 minutes a full-size village can be practically wiped out and a third of the inhabitants killed or injured by four or five machines.” o­ne of those villages is today a town called Fallujah.

Posted by: gmac | Jul 16 2006 18:11 utc | 23

Why are are you being antagonistic to my postings of late citizen k?
Which leads me to ask do you have a citation for your british/India claim? Not that I would be surprized…
I am a truth seeker’s as well as one can be such, in a victor creates history world. I have no problem with being wrong. I strive for accuracy however capricious in my linking.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 16 2006 18:28 utc | 24

Looking back over my link one would think a Senior Scholar at York University in Toronto, Canada would know of which he speaks, however, I use to date a PhD historian, and believe me they can be wrong.
Pastor Valle-Garay is a Senior Scholar at York University in Toronto, Canada. He served as Consul General of Nicaragua to Canada on behalf of the Nicaraguan-Sandinista government.
You may email him at pastor@yorku.ca

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jul 16 2006 18:34 utc | 25

Uncle: No hostility. I suspect that bombing unarmed villagers was one of the first applications of flight, 1927 seemed too late.
I think you’re a little too uncritical of some of the weird stuff out there on the ME – the homeland of every nasty agenda in history, but don’t see any malice in it.

Posted by: citizen k | Jul 16 2006 18:35 utc | 26

The last thing America wants in another Chavez bucked right up against its southern border.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Jul 16 2006 18:39 utc | 27

People seem to be overlooking the critical Nightmarish fact that xUS elites plan to merge xUS w/Mexico (& Canada) in a few yrs., so they’ll fight like hell to insure elections stay as crooked there as they are here, and that they don’t have anyone as Pres. who’ll interfere w/their plans. God knows the am. people are docile as hell, except for those who are opposing creating Sharon-style facts on the ground by allowing Mexicans to flood up here. But, even there, almost all are docile as hell…dumb bastards.

Posted by: jj | Jul 16 2006 19:50 utc | 28

news reports indicate anywhere from 300,000 to 1m today in mexico city. lopez obrador is calling for another demo on july 30. he and his supporters clearly are not going to allow business to continue as usual until they are satisfied by a recount.

Posted by: conchita | Jul 17 2006 3:01 utc | 29

uncle & citizen k, you are both correct. on bombing nicaragua, greg grandlin’s lastest book mentioned this,

Scooping the Nazi Luftwaffe, the first dive-bombing campaign in military history was conducted in Nicaragua, when five two-seater de Havilland biplanes swooped down to disperse insurgents just on the verge of routing U.S. ground forces. [p.22-23]

in which the footnoted source is

Captain Kenneth Jennings, “Sandino against the Marines: The Development of Air Power for Conducting Counterinsurgency Operations in Central America,” Air University Review, July-August 1986.

whose paper is still avail in a google cache here.
here’s a relevant extract

the battle for Ocotal: first dive bombing in history
Sandino’s attack against Ocotal in mid-July would no doubt have been successful, were it not for Marine air power. The Marines had started organizing their air assets in February 1927 when they received their first aircraft under the command of Major Ross Rowell. Six two-seater de Havilland biplanes arrived, as well as four two-seater scouting planes. The de Havillands could carry twenty-five-pound bombs and were equipped with both a forward fixed machine gun fired by the pilot and a rear swivel machine gun controlled by the observer.
Ocotal, approximately 110 miles north of Managua, was defended by forty-one Marines and forty-eight Nicaraguan National Guardsmen when Sandino’s attack began at 0115 on 16 July. A Marine sentry discovered the attack, as approximately 300 of Sandino’s men in three columns were closing in on the Marine’s position under the cover of darkness. The Marines beat back several attacks during the night and refused several summons by Sandino to surrender during the morning. By mid-morning, two Marine reconnaissance planes arrived on their daily patrol and read an aerial panel message laid out by the Ocotal garrison requesting help. One pilot strafed the rebel positions, while the other landed briefly outside of town to get an assessment of the situation from a local peasant. The pilots departed for Managua to obtain reinforcements, and the first major Marine air operation in Nicaragua began when five de Havilland bombers under the command of Major Rowell arrived at 1435 hours. After conducting reconnaissance flights to locate the concentrations of Sandino’s forces, “one after the other, the planes peeled out of formations at 1500 feet, fixed machine guns blazing as they dived to 300 feet, where they dropped their bombs.” The observers used the rear swivel machine guns to shoot additional Sandinistas as the planes climbed back up to altitude. A ground observer of the air attack stated that it “was as if hell broke loose. Quick explosions, then a heavy thundering one, sometimes indescribable.” During the forty-five-minute aerial attack, the aircraft strafed the rebels with 4000 rounds of ammunition and dropped twenty-seven bombs, killing more than 100 of Sandino’s men.

The battle at Ocotal proved significant for air power by introducing several innovations to air warfare. As Neill Macaulay, a historian and expert on Sandino, observes, the Marine aviators conducted “the first organized dive-bombing attack in history––long before the Nazi Luftwaffe was popularly credited with the ‘innovation’.” Another authority on the Marine campaign, Lejeune Cummins, adds that the battle marked “the first time in military annals that the relief of a beleaguered town was effected through the air.”

Posted by: b real | Jul 17 2006 4:20 utc | 30

slideshow from mexico. now that’s a lot of people!

Posted by: b real | Jul 17 2006 4:30 utc | 31

b real, thanks for 173 reminders of why i love mexico. talk about inspirational!

Posted by: conchita | Jul 17 2006 4:45 utc | 32

Conchita, thanks.
I have spent time in Mexico too, a trip along the gringo trail around 1983 or 4.
Oaxaca, the non-banks, the 5-gallon white buckets selling quesadillas in the cities, the corrugated-steel-roofed shanties that were the restaurants along the highways in the country.
How can we know another people, even the ones outside our neighbourhood. Yet I have a big heart for the Mexican people I met outside the tourist areas. I should think that the well-known alienating effect of travel let me see these Spanish-speaking people in a new light, somehow more worthy of my interest than the ones on the other side of town, the province or state or county next to my own.
I think that people are all wonderful, loving and helpful. Bottom line.
But seeing a world unlike your own but still comprehensible, is a revelation. I’m sorry to report that the international ventures of the western world, and perhaps all such sorties, can only claim as positive results that upon return the agents, the men and women of the armies, cooks, pilots, repairmen, peace agencies, monitors, reporters, should have the same positive answer, that in fact people are pretty much okay all over the world as long as they are not trying to hurt your or steal your money, and even that behavior, even for soldiers, is pretty fucking scarce.
Mostly we all just want to get along.
Pass the word.

Posted by: jonku | Jul 17 2006 8:25 utc | 33