Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 28, 2006
Various News

Various Sunday News Items:

Frank Rich endorses Gore. Parts of his Times Select column are liberated here

Mrs. Clinton does look like a weak candidate – not so much because of her marriage, her gender or her liberalism, but because of her eagerness to fudge her stands on anything and everything to appeal to any and all potential voters.
[…]

While a Gore candidacy could not single-handedly save the Democrats from themselves any more than his movie can vanquish "X-Men" at the multiplex, it might at least force the party powers that be to start facing some inconvenient but necessary truths.

I agree with that. Go Al.

NYT on Ahmadinejad: Iran Chief Eclipses Clerics as He Consolidates Power. Money quote:

He has evicted the former president, Mohammad Khatami, from his offices, …

This is like saying "Bush has evicted Clinton from his office." Hey, the had an e_l_e_c_t_i_o_n! Deeper into the article there are some insights. Ahmadinejad is a socialist:

"Parliament and government should fight against wealthy officials," Mr. Ahmadinejad said in a speech before Parliament on Saturday that again appeared aimed at upending pillars of the status quo. "Wealthy people should not have influence over senior officials because of their wealth. They should not impose their demands on the needs of the poor people."

and he is fighting for women rights:

Perhaps most surprising, the man who was rumored to want to segregate men and women on elevators and even sidewalks has emerged as a proponent of women’s rights, challenging some of the nation’s most powerful religious leaders.

Interesting fight within the coal industry – dirty versus very dirty coal power plants: 2 Industry Leaders Bet on Coal but Split on Cleaner Approach

WaPo: A gruesome Nir Rosen piece: Iraq Is the Republic of Fear

[T]he civil war started long before Samarra and long before the first uprisings. It started when U.S. troops arrived in Baghdad. It began when Sunnis discovered what they had lost, and Shiites learned what they had gained. And the worst is yet to come.

Robert Kagen has a revealing argument why in 2008 the Democrats should win. If Power Shifts In 2008. You see, if they don´t win, there is a chance that they would eventually become an anti-imperialistic party. Now we can`t have that, can we?

Independent: The children of Guantanamo Bay

Lawyers in London estimate that more than 60 detainees held at the terrorists’ prison camp were boys under 18 when they were captured.

They include at least 10 detainees still held at the US base in Cuba who were 14 or 15 when they were seized – including child soldiers who were held in solitary confinement, repeatedly interrogated and allegedly tortured.

Telegraph: Blair as Bush spokesman: Blair beefed up his Iran speech to please Bush

The Prime Minister changed key passages on possible action against Iran, climate change, and a proposed shake-up of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

Objections by President George W Bush’s inner circle played a key role in the alterations, which were made just before Mr Blair delivered his landmark address at Georgetown University in Washington, on Friday, British sources have revealed.

Funny: The 25 Worst Tech Products of All Time by PC World. Only IT products, so the headline is misleading. But having lived through all those hype products in the industry it’s fun to remember.

Comments

ABC News says Hastert ‘bribe’ story is solid

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 28 2006 14:50 utc | 1

I don’t think that Frank Rich endorsed Gore.

The less flattering aspect of Mr. Gore has not gone away: the cautious and contrived presidential candidate who, like Mrs. Clinton now, was so in thrall to consultants that he ran away from his own administration’s record and muted his views, even about pet subjects like science. (He waffled on the teaching of creationism in August 1999, after the Kansas Board of Education struck down the teaching of evolution.) That Gore is actually accentuated, not obscured, by “An Inconvenient Truth.”

Let’s not forget that Rich is a drama critic.
And frankly, the hell with 2008! Hillary Clinton has a challenger for the Democratic nomination right now, and a good one, in Jonathan Tasini. If it were the actual State of the Union that Rich was interested in, rather than his “movie review”, he’d have “endorsed” Jonathan Tasini.
I think Tasini can beat Clinton and win the Senate seat.
Check him out.
As for Toney B. Liar, as I’ve seen him referred to, I wonder if he isn’t more despicable than Bush himself. Bush, after all, felt he had everything to gain by going to war. Surely the toney one new better.

Posted by: John Francis Lee | May 28 2006 15:10 utc | 2

Addendum:
Important blogsite devoted exclusively to Hastert and his financial shenanigans:Lukery kicking ass! …disclose, denny!
Can An Australian Blogger Bring Down Speaker Hastert?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 28 2006 15:26 utc | 4

Groucho,
your Cohen post was interesting. I am still amused at these folks who still think that there is any connection between military spending and any sort of “free market”: the goods they trade are highly regulated and restricted, there is a small and limited group of both suppliers and customers.
Yet Cohen still talks in terms of “being competitive in the global economy.”

Posted by: ralphieboy | May 28 2006 17:26 utc | 5

that wapo fear article is a real chiller. when things get as bad as they are it becomes almost an ventriloquist act trying to spin it as progress. seems peace has no end in sight.

Posted by: annie | May 28 2006 17:54 utc | 6

Interesting Boston Globe piece on Cheney’s Cheney, aka David Addington.
The legal counsel of the Vice-President goes through every new law Congress makes to look where it might restrict the President and prepared those 700+ signing statement Bush then uses to circumvent the law.
It shows that Bush is really the puppet and everything with power is Cheney.
Any but few constitution experts do think these signing statements have absolutly no legal standing.
Cheney aide is screening legislation

Posted by: b | May 28 2006 18:17 utc | 7

Sibel Edmonds can definitely bring down denny. Dan Ellsberg said she knows that he was given literally suitcases of drug money. We’re at the point where anyone who knows what’s going on is muzzled for “nat’l security”.

Posted by: jj | May 28 2006 18:29 utc | 8

Funny. Isn’t it? National security has become a ‘loophole’.

Posted by: pb | May 28 2006 19:12 utc | 9

“Ahmadinejad is a socialist”
What???? That would certainly make him an arch enemy of American Interests, wouldn’t it? The Corporate State of America will have to ‘take him out’ now, for sure. Has he gassed his own people too?

Posted by: pb | May 28 2006 19:28 utc | 10

@pb – Ahmadinejad
Islam is a inherent socialist religion. 10% of all income is to be given to charities, no rate is to be asked or given for loans etc.
That is very well in the mind of the US business elite and a huge, but never mentioned reason to fight the “Global Struggle Against Islamist Extremism”.
If you look at the “axis of evil” and the other countries on the neocon list, all are/were essentially socialist economies.

Posted by: b | May 28 2006 19:38 utc | 11

If anyone’s around, put on CSPAN-2. James Carroll is on.
On Sept. 11, 1941 Ground Was Broken for the Pentagon…about the same moment…Coincidence???

Posted by: jj | May 28 2006 20:18 utc | 12

Just wondering (cause I don’t know for sure)….
Does the fact it was the UN that apparently brokered the ceasefire between Israel and Hizbollahr in Lebanon today mean that US is/has/maybe losing any semblance of honest broker in the region?
Thanks.
.

Posted by: RossK | May 29 2006 1:49 utc | 13

@RossK
Sure would look like it. Although, strictly speaking, you can’t lose something you don’t have.

Posted by: Monolycus | May 29 2006 4:14 utc | 14

Obscure but interesting- Rudy Giuliani and company are shilling for the government of Kazakhstan. See banner ad on International Herald Tribune site (iht.com), sponsors of the investment conference and owned by the ‘objective’ NYT.

Posted by: biklett | May 29 2006 4:24 utc | 15

International Herald Tribune

Posted by: Anonymous | May 29 2006 5:09 utc | 16

Giuliani, Ken Lay or Cheney wannabe?

Posted by: biklett | May 29 2006 6:30 utc | 17

Trophies in a Barrel: US Politicians Taking Pot-Shots at ‘Illegal Immigration’
By Carrie Underwood
South Carolina Daily Specter
Published: May 31, 2006
“Illegal Immigration” — the sport of publicly slamming the indigent working immigrants in our midst, those who work migrant labor with little chance to escape from poverty — seems to generate controversy wherever it is practiced, whether by politicians running for re-election in Texas or in private corporate boardrooms in New York.
A homeless Guatamalan man was rescued today from a New York Lower East Side sweatshop by the humanitarian DeWalt Foundation, a charitable offshoot of the famous construction tool-making company. He had been coaxed into a retraining program, and then sold to the sweatshop. Homeless indigents and immigrants can be re-trained in abandoned US military barracks, and then used for cheap labor and for domestic service by private businessmen and multi-national corporations.
The US federal government is considering banning such immigrant retraining programs, which charge the costs of transport and retraining against the immigrant’s future income, so that in many cases, they must work years or even decades before they accrue any savings of their own, and are constantly in fear of being revealed and then deported, without being able to collect their life savings, held by their employer.
In South Carolina, the ‘migra’ controversy came to a climax last fall when a panel of experts commissioned by the country’s election officials recommended a total ban on the practice by humanitarian groups, which also had included training homeless indigents to drive and to vote.
In the next two months, the South Carolina Department of Labor Affairs and Expatriatism is expected to act on that recommendation by releasing for public comment the first draft of regulations on indigent retraining standards.
The cost could be steep. South Carolina has a thriving black-market migra labor industry that generates about $280 million a year from domestic service, general labor and military volunteerism.
Hiring immigrants is prohibited in the state’s 22 counties, but, as the panel noted in its report, both personal and corporate revenues earned by avoiding income tax and benefit co-payments and other non-taxable conveniences far outstrip the loss of state and local sales taxes, due to the sub-minimum pay levels, and in some cases, to work-for-board, which takes place mostly in private homes of the very well-to-do.
The diversity of its immigrant populations makes South Carolina one of the most popular worker retraining destinations. Bengalis, Guamese, Romanians and Ghanians are among the most desirable workers. South Carolina illegal-hire search Web sites advertise “big five” packages, which refers to one-stop hiring for a cook, maid, gardener, chauffeur and nanny.
But not all illegal-hire searches are the same. Lucrative profits have led some private illegal- retraining operators to conduct immigrant outreach “safaris” overseas, which virtually guarantee the new immigrant will speak very little English, be compliant to domestic re-training, and work for room-and-board plus a small stipend, without complaint. Growing concern over the ethics of this practice led Martin Schalk, the minister of labor affairs and expatriatism, to convene a panel of management experts to report on the dark underside of America’s illegals hiring boom.
I spoke with a Nepalese maid outside a toney Charlestown mansion this afternoon, who explained in broken English that she was enticed onto a private plane by a wealthy “benefactor”, who said he was going to bring humanitarian aid to her country after she was trained in the US as an interpretor, only to have one of her kidneys surgically removed, and then be sold into domestic service, oweing her client the finder’s fee and cost of her plane fare to the US.
The unsavory aspects of illegal smuggling in South Carolina were first revealed in “The Cook Report,” a 1997 French documentary, which showed drugged domestics being unloaded by American dealers from the backs of their vehicles outside large estates. The public, both in and outside South Carolina, responded with outrage, but in the nine years since then, no national policy on illegals hiring has been put into effect to stop the practice of illegals outreach retraining.
Instead, politicians and business pundits are taking pot-shots at illegal aliens who have come to the United States for work, after being driven out of their country by relentless and ruthless corporate global, so-called “free trade”.
“Send Them Back!” a billboard in El Paso shouts.
Along the Arizona border, Minutemen, private vigilantes, are erecting barrier fences, and the US government has moved National Guard to the state, in what is seen largely as a political move to garner votes, rather than deal with the dark issues of re-emergent slavery in the US.
“One must bear in mind that certain individuals do contravene the law,” smiled Sheriff Leslie Durham, chief of police for Vendetta County. National legislation would be an effort to curb what he calls “rogues”, but the sheriff said he doesn’t believe the federal government will be any more effective in accomplishing real labor reform, than they were in handling Katrina.
“We had slavery for four hundred years before the Yankees, and I’m sure we will have slavery for another four hundred years, you can betcha,” he yawned and spat a gob of chew into a dixie cup.
“This here is our’n promised land.”

Posted by: Carrie Underwood | May 29 2006 7:22 utc | 18

Joschka Fisher (ex German Foreign Minister): The Case for Bargaining With Iran

An offer of a “grand bargain” would unite the international community and present Iran with a convincing alternative. Were Iran to accept, its suspension of nuclear research in Natanz while negotiations are ongoing would be the litmus test of its sincerity. Were Iran to refuse the offer or fail to honor its obligations, it would totally isolate itself internationally and provide emphatic legitimization to further measures. Neither Russia nor China could avoid showing solidarity within the Security Council.
But such an initiative can succeed only if the American administration assumes leadership among the Western nations and sits down at the negotiating table with Iran. Even then, the international community would not have long to act. As all sides must be aware, time is running out for a diplomatic solution.

But he also says “There can no longer be any reasonable doubt that Iran’s ambition is to obtain nuclear weapons capability.” I wonder how he got that idea? IAEA doesn´t say so.

Posted by: b | May 29 2006 7:47 utc | 19

East Timor is heartbreaking at the moment. Depurty Sheriff Johnny Howard has grabbed everything out of Dubya’s playbook including how to totally destroy a country beyond recognition and still not get the oil and gas resources.
It’s a very complex situation but put simply the Australian Government trying to force the same conditions that were contained in the Timor Gap treaty with Indonesia into the Timor Sea Treaty it is making with East Timor.
Australia got a particularly good deal with Indonesia simply because the Timor Gap Treaty recognised Indonesia’s illegal occupation of East Timor.
When the Timorese chased the Indonesians out Howard was quick to get into Timor to ‘help’ the people, or so it seemed.
There is no doubt that the Liberal Party Government was concerned about Portugal, who through their state owned oil company had been financing the East Timorese resistance; getting too close to the new government. Portugal were Timor’s former colonial rulers, had been since about 1650.
They relinquished Timor when their own facist govt fell in the 1970’s at the same time as they pulled out of Angola and Mozambique. At that time Portugal was a mess, about as impoverished as any of it’s colonies. Thirty years on with the EU behind them they would be a much tougher opponent for Australia to chase out of Timor.
So Australia went in to help Timor but by the time the initial UN mandate for being there expired it had become apparent that the Timorese may want a more equitable split of the hydrocarbons off their coast, located much closer to East Timor than Australia. In fact it could be argued that the whole field belongs to the Timorese!
If you listen to the Australian Govt the Timorese are getting a good deal 90% of the oil, up from 60-40, except that oil isn’t the honey pot. Gas is.
Going on 2002 prices so the current values should be double what are quoted here. Timor stands to get US$5 billion from it’s 90% oil share over twenty years.
Now that’s not peanuts for a country whose population is just on 1 million souls, however over the same period Australia will get some US$45 billion from it’s 100% share in the natural gas, all of which is being piped out through Darwin in Northern Australia.
One can see why the Timorese may feel a bit discomfited by this. Especially considering if the allocations were divided between the two countries using the standard mid-point geographic method to determine each nation’s boundaries, virtually all the gas should go to Timor.
The Australians pulled out as soon as they could do so without breaking their undertaking to the UN, despite pleas from the Timorese to stay longer as the country lacked any of the infrastructure to be an effective nation.
The NZers who were providing a smaller force alongside the Australians also tried to prevail upon Howard to extend the ‘tour’.
By this time 2002, other issues grabbed people’s attention and provided that dirty little coward, sheriff Johnny Howard with an excuse.
Although to be fair no one was really concerned being as the oil and gas dollars would be flowing as soon as Australia relented, agreed to a more equitable share and the work began.
But that wasn’t John Howards intention, and as a NZer by birth but an Australian by choice I honestly believe that wasn’t the wish of the vast majority of Australians, but most have absolutely no idea of these machinations.
The oil and gas exploitation has been on hold while Deputy John waits out the Timorese; rated by the UN as living in one of the most impoverished nations on this planet.
The situation hasn’t been assisted by some of the Fretilin government who haven’t seen the poverty of the people as any reason for keeping their own snouts out of the trough.
The country has split in two.
The people from the West are Malay type ethnicity and those in the East are Melanesian. similar to Solomon Islanders or Papuans and they are now fighting each other.
As far as I can tell it began a couple of months ago when former resistance fighters who had been assimilated into the army tried to stage industrial action because they hadn’t been paid for a year or so.
Now these former revolutionaries naturally imagined that leftish principles would be supported by their allegedly leftist government. It was by Xanana Gusmao the President and head of state of East Timor. President is not the job with the real political power though, that is held in the Prime Minister’s gig. Gusmao hadn’t wanted to be President because what is happening was precisely what he had feared.
Years of fighting and hiding in the jungle, only to be given up to spend years in Indonesian prisons had taught him that there were real revolutionaries and there were real assholes.
The assholes contributed to a lot of his problems during the Indonesian occupation by directing all the heat on Xanana.
By the time that Timor got their independence most had thought it a lost battle but propitious happenstance coinciding with Suharto’s fall from grace landed Timor’s freedom.
So Xanana was persuaded to take on the largely ceremonial role of President.
Despite Prime Minister Mari Alkatiri’s best efforts to make Xanana the scapegoat for East Timor’s problems it seems the Fretilin propagandists did too good a job back in the day because now more than ever Xanana is regarded by the people of all ethnicities as their ‘father’.
Anyway when the soldiers went on strike the assholes like Prime Minister Mari Alkatiri and his faction of trough guzzlers from the east, did an unbelievably stupid thing. They sacked their army!
Told em to piss off. Which the army did. They went back into the hills where they had lived for the decades of Indonesian occupation and regrouped.
Xanana begged both sides not to do what came next; which was to pit the former army against the new police force who are mainly comprised of easterners.
Once they started killing each other last week, the whole of Dili (East Timor’s major population centre) split down the middle and declared war on each other.
One can’t help but think that all the Timorese have got so far from their much espoused but never actually grasped wealth, is the usual heap of trouble that developing countries get when they have resources.
Why in no time at all they’ll be in the same position as Burma, the Congo or Iraq. Talk about having all the luck!

Posted by: Anonymous | May 29 2006 9:02 utc | 20

A couple of articles on the South of Iraq going SOUTH.
First this on the general chaos in Basra, with the implication of Iranian influence:
Iraq’s top Shiites acknowledge that they want to set up a regional government in the south, but they insist that the provinces involved would remain loyal to the central government in Baghdad. But an Iran-friendly Shiite government in the south could have far-reaching effects on Iraq and the Persian Gulf region and on the strategic position of U.S. military forces in the country.
U.S. forces are dependent on a fragile re-supply line that runs from Kuwait north to Baghdad through southern Iraq. A regional government allied with Iran could pose a risk to that supply line.
Such a government also would further agitate Iraq’s Sunni and Kurdish minorities, which could fragment the country, a development that Western analysts fear would destabilize the region.
A Shiite regional government might also greatly enhance Iran’s regional influence by giving it a strategic Shiite partner with vast amounts of oil in a Middle East dominated by Sunni-run countries. Neighboring Kuwait’s population is about one-third Shiite, and Bahrain and Saudi Arabia’s oil-rich Eastern Province are majority Shiite.
Already, there are signs that neighboring Sunni countries are pumping resources to small Sunni factions in Basra to combat Iranian influence, said a senior Iraqi Ministry of Defense official in Basra. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because he feared for his life.
……………………………………………………………And this piece from Reuters< spells out how the Virtue party (Fadhila Party) has broken with the Miliki government, and is using its influence in the oil industry -- and perhaps with backing from Iran -- to achieve a de-facto autonomy: By Mariam Karouny BAGHDAD, May 26 (Reuters) - Iraq's new government risks being held to ransom by a dissident Shi'ite faction using its local clout in Basra to hobble vital oil exports, Iraqi officials and senior political sources said on Friday. They warned that the locally powerful Fadhila party was threatening to have members in the oil industry stage a go-slow to halt exports through the key southern oil port if it did not win the concessions it wanted from Baghdad. "Fadhila is in control," a senior Shi'ite political source close to the party said. Turf wars among Iraq's ruling Shi'ite Islamist parties have long made its second city a confusing battleground for rival militias, leaving the British forces nominally in charge of Basra hoping that the new government can finally impose order. Instead, the small Fadhila, which controls the governor's office and parts of the local oil industry but which refused to join Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's cabinet, risks turning the tables on Baghdad by turning off its cash lifeline. "He who owns Basra owns the oil reserves. It is the gateway to the Gulf," the Shi'ite political source said. "It's the richest city in the world. It has a strategic position so why would any one give it up?" ..................................................................... So, what appears to be happening is that the Virtue party is looking at achieving on the ground (as opposed to green zone) governance of the south through an alliance with the Sadr movement (also very active in Basra) and with (still) illusive Iranian backing. This as the first link describes, has brought in a more overt Saudi/Sunni flow of cash into the region, playing out in yet deeper sectarian and clan (marsh arabs) conflict. I think I hear that "sucking sound" of regional interests showing their influence -- all while folks in the green zone play monopoly (the game).

Posted by: anna missed | May 29 2006 10:01 utc | 21

Dog gone it — heres the reuters LINK

Posted by: anna missed | May 29 2006 10:08 utc | 22

Thanks to Debs(?) and anna missed
for interesting links. Meanwhile, here in Italy the Prodi
government is having its first test via the local elections
in several cities of Italy which conclude later today.
Berlusconi is taking a patently rabble-rousing stance,
and any unexpected setback for the local center-left governments would quickly be trumpeted as a rejection
of the Prodi’s national government. One can hope that
Berlusca’s Milan team will be more deeply involved in
the one scandal that really is rocking Italy these days:
the so-called “clean feet” scandal involving manipulation
of soccer game refereeing.

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | May 29 2006 11:00 utc | 23

@ anna missed there’s definitely some funny shit going on down south in Basra, but if Mocky is in there somehow I doubt the Iranians are.
Remember when this thing all began after the fall of Baghdad; Muqtada al-Sadr was on the outer precisely because he was setting up a Shia movement independent of Iran.
If the Iranians are involved in government in the south it will be in spite of Muqtada al-Sadr, not because of him. I suspect that Knight-Ridder story is more about cranking up the US population to nuke the Iranians than shedding any light especially since it’s mostly third hand gossip backed up with supposition.
That said the other articles are probably spot the sucking from the bottom of USuk hasn’t really been happening since 2003.
The brits seem to have had a policy with Iraqis of “We won’t shoot you, if you don’t shoot us” and have largely left the factions to their own devices.
There is a great BBC story today saying that there are upwards of 1000 British military personnal who have permanently absconded since the beginning of the Iraq war.
The Ministry of Defence are pulling a catch-22 about why they told parliament that there had only been a handful of deserters.
Until a soldier is caught and tried he is absent without leave (AWOL). He not a deserter until he’s convicted of desertion, and that’s not going to happen if no-one is looking for him.
Somehow I doubt the pommie public would wear a 1000 blokes being tried for desertion. They’d probably be wanting Bliar to pull the pin on Iraq after they got past 6.
You’ll notice that according to the Brit media they are deserting to get away from “US atrocities” which I don’t quite get since they are fighting 100’s of miles apart. Wasn’t that Brits on the video last year hunting and bashing young Iraqi blokes?
Take the maimed and dying Iraqis out of the equation and the whole Iraq thing become a mildly amusing farce. Of course we can’t do that but the most likely outcome BliarPlc/BushCo are going to gett for the attempt to add to their ME oil resources is the loss of all their current ME sources, with no commensurate Iraqi oil source.

Posted by: Anonymous | May 29 2006 11:12 utc | 24

The Need to obey
by Stirling Newberry*
snip:

Within the heart of the turblent and provisional world of discourse, decision and democracy, their lives a deep seated urge to certainty. A wish for the dust to settle. To come to have, among all of the possessions that a person is allowed to have, a sense of the rightness of heaven and earth, and achieve a moral certainty of action that is beyond the reach of decision.
While this urge is often acted upon by demogouges and politicians engorged by ego, it afflicts even the most dedicated. It is for this reason that we must remind ourselves of the evils, the moral evils, of closed societies. The danger of course, is to be hypnotized by its own rhetoric. Closed societies exist all over the world, but they can no more be made into open societies by fiant than paper can be made into money by fiat. It is the value and functioning of the whole society which makes an election, or a dollar, work.

*Stirling Newberry is also the author of the erudite
Roves Republic.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 29 2006 12:22 utc | 25

Paul Krugman (liberated): Swift Boating the Planet

In fact, the chart Dr. Michaels showed was a fraud — that is, it wasn’t what Dr. Hansen actually predicted. The original paper showed a range of possibilities, and the actual rise in temperature has fallen squarely in the middle of that range. So how did Dr. Michaels make it seem as if Dr. Hansen’s prediction was wildly off? Why, he erased all the lower curves, leaving only the curve that the original paper described as being “on the high side of reality.”

Even now, Dr. Hansen seems reluctant to say the obvious. “Is this treading close to scientific fraud?” he recently asked about Dr. Michaels’s smear. The answer is no: it isn’t “treading close,” it’s fraud pure and simple.
Now, Dr. Hansen isn’t running for office. But Mr. Gore might be, and even if he isn’t, he hopes to promote global warming as a political issue. And if he wants to do that, he and those on his side will have to learn to call liars what they are.

Posted by: b | May 29 2006 20:11 utc | 26

NYT: [Ahmadinejad] has evicted the former president, Mohammad Khatami, from his offices…
Bernhard: This is like saying “Bush has evicted Clinton from his office.” Hey, they had an e_l_e_c_t_i_o_n!
I think that comparison is a little off.  What about Clinton’s fancy ex-presidential office in Harlem NYC?  As far as I know, Bush *could* evict Clinton from that office (it’s paid for by the gov’t) but hasn’t.

Posted by: Pyesetz the Dog | May 29 2006 22:06 utc | 27

debs
& in all this mess i notice that this selfsame aust govt – a real partner of bush – has gone into an unparalleled attack on aboriginal institutions, people & culture. attacking their communities – all their instants of defence (housing health education & law)
it is like these thieves & murderers in the midst of the mayhem they have created in our world are doing some very fast shifting of forces against all their enemies – potential, imagined or real
that they willingly as in east timor or in iraq act at the behest of their real masters – which was & remains u s imperialism is of no surprise
this whole arena of indonesia, east timor & papua new guinea is another tale of u s interests being the most dominant & of being the decisive factor in the day to day terror of the people

Posted by: remembereringgiap | May 29 2006 23:23 utc | 28

wayne madsen strikes back at kos “and his merry band of holier-than-thou confabulators” today

Posted by: b real | May 30 2006 2:33 utc | 29

a recent zogby poll shows that Only 3% of Americans Fully Trust Congress. amazingly, the guy playing the role of the president scores 24% in that category, though there’s hardly anyone sitting on the fence – 69% report rate his trustworthiness as low.

Posted by: b real | May 30 2006 3:12 utc | 30

@b real
yep, the blog wars are on…
Welcome to the drama . I can tell you the author of this piece is a straight up A-hole and I had often wondered if he and a few others at dkos weren’t agent provocateur’s. From my experience, DHinMI is a narrow minded zionist shame viper…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | May 30 2006 3:46 utc | 31

But Kos and his merry band of holier-than-thou confabulators now act as a Ministry of Truth for the Democratic Party and progressive movement. In fact, they are pathetic censors and narrow agenda propagandists.
About sums it up B Real.
Madsen said it so well I don’t have to. A bunch of pathetic jerk-offs, in my opinion.
But with a DLC political agenda written all over them, none the less.

Posted by: Groucho | May 30 2006 3:56 utc | 32

###damned Scam,
I probably just got banned over there.
Have to check tomorrow sometime to see if anyone reads anything there.

Posted by: Groucho | May 30 2006 4:06 utc | 33

@Pyesetz I think that comparison is a little off. What about Clinton’s fancy ex-presidential office in Harlem NYC? As far as I know, Bush *could* evict Clinton from that office (it’s paid for by the gov’t) but hasn’t.
That is not what the article is claiming. It is refering to functions, not office rooms.

Posted by: b | May 30 2006 6:30 utc | 34

Neocons in the Democratic Party

DON’T LOOK now, but neoconservatism is making a comeback — and not among the Republicans who have made it famous but in the Democratic Party.
A host of pundits and young national security experts associated with the party are calling for a return to the Cold War precepts of President Truman to wage a war against terror that New Republic Editor Peter Beinart, in the title of his provocative new book, calls “The Good Fight.”

This new crop of liberal hawks calls for expanding the existing war against terrorism, beefing up the military and promoting democracy around the globe while avoiding the anti-civil liberties excesses of the Bush administration. They support a U.S. government that would seek multilateral consensus before acting abroad, but one that is not scared to use force when necessary.

Where will all this lead? To an internecine Democratic war, of course. Just as Republicans are being riven by debates between realists and Bush administration idealists, so the Democratic Party is about to witness its own battle.

Posted by: b | May 30 2006 6:41 utc | 35

“DON’T LOOK now, but neoconservatism is making a comeback — and not among the Republicans who have made it famous but in the Democratic Party.”
Hardly qualifies as “news” per se, what with Clinton and Kerry’s “more boots on the ground” speeches and voting records, but it’s nice to see someone calling it what it is.

Posted by: Monolycus | May 30 2006 7:01 utc | 36

@Groucho et al:

I don’t like Kos — he’s an apologist for the Democrats at a moment when the Democrats deserve condemnation almost as much as the Republicans — but after a very short while Wayne Madsen’s column was just kind of embarrassing. It was like reading, say, Hillary Clinton condemning Bush — you agree with the condemnation, but it still makes you squirm.

The part where I switched from “maybe he has a point” to “this is just childish” was where Madsen said

Mr. Kos seems to think its perfectly legitimate and professional to allow his web site to be used to question the veracity of an on-line editor who has just released a new book and who, in part, depends on book sales to earn a living and be able to subsist in cost-of-living soaring Washington, DC.

As written, the only way to read that is “web sites should not allow anonymous posters to criticise authors because it might hurt them (the authors) financially.” Don’t tell Ann Coulter that — she has a new book coming out soon, too. Whether Madsen is coming out with a book or not is irrelevant to the question of his use or abuse by Kos’ site, and bringing it up at all makes him sound like he’s banging on the table.

Posted by: The Truth Gets Vicious When You Corner It | May 30 2006 7:08 utc | 37

Following on b’s 2:41 post, Robert Kagan, PNAC co-founder, endorses Dems in 2008:

…at least half of PNAC now considers it desirable that a Democrat (like Hillary or Biden or Richardson or Bayh or Vilsack or Warner) becomes the next President. They think they can control them, and they are probably right.

{Kagan:}The Democrats need to take ownership of American foreign policy again, for their sake as well as the country’s. Long stretches in opposition sometimes drive parties toward defeatism, utopianism, isolationism or permutations of all three. What starts off as legitimate attacks on the inevitable errors of the party in power can veer off into a wholesale rejection of the opposition party’s own foreign policy principles.

It’s precisely the foreign policy principles of our nation’s leaders and arms merchants that have led us to where we are today, and it is precisely the utopianism of the Project for a New American Century and their neo-conservative allies that litter the halls of power that has undermined the consensus for permawar and a permawar footing among the left.
Kagan gives away the game in this column. His assumption is that the causes of threats to the homeland have no causal basis in American imperialism, occupation, or double standards. The only potential cause for a threat comes from those that don’t advocate doing more of the same, spending more of the same, and doing it with more bellicosity, fewer allies, and less national unanimity.
At least, it seems that way. But, in reality, it’s more complicated. How can you explain that a man that was Deputy for Policy under Bush-pere-pardoned Elliott Abrams, Principal Speechwriter for Secretary George Schultz and foreign policy advisor to Jack Kemp would write a column advocating the Republicans be swept out of the White House? The answer is that he fears the Democrats will move so far to the left if they do not elect a DLC Democrat in 2008 that it will endanger the consensus within this country that allows us maintain bases all throughout Asia and an enormous military budget.

Posted by: Anonymous | May 30 2006 11:35 utc | 38

@TVicious:
Yeah it was in ways childish.
Still, in asymetrical cyberwar, an old saying still holds:
“the enemy of My Enemy is My Friend”.
And B and anon and Mono, good articles and words. The most dangerous thing I see is the foreigh-policy angle.
Resurrecting an utterly failed approach.
Hell, if we want to do this we can give the Poodle dipomatic asylum and make him king.

Posted by: Groucho | May 30 2006 13:08 utc | 39

secrecy news: Vice President Refuses to Report Classification Activity

For the third year in a row the Office of Vice President Dick Cheney has refused to disclose data on its classification and declassification activity, in an apparent violation of an executive order issued by President Bush.
“The Office of the Vice President (OVP), the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB), and the Homeland Security Council (HSC) failed to report their data to ISOO this year,” the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) noted in its new 2005 Annual Report to the President.
The Office of the Vice President has declined to report such data since 2002. Yet it is clear that disclosure is not optional.

maybe he’s just adhering to his title. from the dictionary, i see this,
vice: 1. A two-jawed clamp used to hold tools or work in place. 2. a specific form of evildoing.

Posted by: b real | May 30 2006 15:41 utc | 40

Snow “resigns”.

Posted by: beq | May 30 2006 16:01 utc | 41

Snow’s replacement is a Gore-ist.
I wonder why he took the job at all. It doesn´t have any power against this White House and if he starts to mention any real economic number they will have to fire him immediately for going against their agenda. Weird.

Posted by: b | May 30 2006 17:44 utc | 42

@Groucho:

Don’t be dense. The saying “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” was never intended to be taken literally. If the neo-nazis started protesting against Bush (as they might for his cozying up to Israel) would you start praising them on that principle? Of course not.

Posted by: The Truth Gets Vicious When You Corner It | May 30 2006 18:13 utc | 43

chris floyd: Siberian Khatru: On Being Banned by Daily Kos

Last week, I was banned from contributing to Daily Kos, apparently for criticizing the Democratic cave-in on Peeper Hayden’s CIA nomination a bit too forcefully. At least I think that was the reason; maybe they just didn’t like the cut of my jib, I don’t know. This banishment to Kossack Siberia is a matter of no great importance, of course, neither to the wider world nor to me, but as the shunning was accompanied by several ugly and false personal accusations against me (and our webmaster here, Richard Kastelein, who was also banned), I thought I would take this opportunity to respond. I wouldn’t want to let swift-boatian slanders enter the public record unchallenged.

After the banning, I asked DK if I could respond to the lies and insults of some of the site’s commenters. This request wasn’t granted, but below is the reply I would have posted.

counterpunch: The DLC and Israel: Zionist Democrats

To coincide with Olmert’s visit, the Democratic Leadership Council published a statement celebrating “Zionism” and condemning Islam. If their publication had not come from a man who purports to be a leader of the political opposition to the deeply unpopular right-wing Republican regime one might be inclined to surmise that it had been issued by the so-called Israel Lobby.
In what was meant to be a moving personal account of his fifth trip to Israel, Al From, the founding father and CEO of the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), defined Zionism as, “a good idea filled with hope.” On his journey, Mr. From visited the summit of Mount Hadar where he experienced a moving vision of Israeli ‘hope’ locked in conflict with Palestinian ‘anger.’

Inspired by Mr. From’s Zionist reverie and Prime Minister Olmert’s visit to the Bush White House, the DLC is in the midst of heralding and hyping the publication of a book titled, With All Our Might, which is little more than a collection of essays advocating a radically Zionist agenda. In their vision of America and its role in the world, it is ironic that Mr. From and his DLC differ very little if at all from the neoconservatives propping up the sinking framework the Bush White House.
For example, With All Our Might, advocates a plan of action that seriously proposes that the Democratic Party should support a swift and decisive increase in the militarization of American society. Another policy objective advocated by the authors of With All Our Might is the long-term, ongoing and open-ended continuance of the counterproductive US occupation of Iraq. Even though the latest polls indicate that the American people and most especially the Democratic grassroots would prefer a timely exit from Iraq, the authors of With All Our Might advocate that the Democratic Party, “should rally the American people for an extended and robust security and reconstruction presence (in Iraq).”

via mark crispin miller’s blog: Theocratic genocide in Africa

Crushing news out of Uganda last week. The Bush administration’s $1 billion experiment in using abstinence messages as the basis of HIV prevention has born its first fruit: In a public speech on May 18, Uganda’s AIDS Commissioner Kihumuro Apuuli announced that HIV infections have almost doubled in Uganda over the past two years, from 70,000 in 2003 to 130,000 in 2005. And despite this chilling wake-up call, Bush has empowered Christian right activists to continue to push their abstinence-only agenda at a UN Special Session on HIV/AIDS, to begin next week. According to a State Department email I obtained, the official U.S. delegation is stacked with some of the very people who contributed to the debacle in Uganda.
Uganda was once an HIV prevention success story, where an ambitious government-sponsored prevention campaign, including massive condom distribution and messages about delaying sex and reducing numbers of partners, pushed HIV rates down from 15 percent in the early 1990s to 5 percent in 2001. But conservative evangelicals rewrote this history–with the full-throated cooperation of Uganda’s evangelical first family, the Musevenis.

wwIV report: Guatemalan war criminal dies a free man

When Slobodan Milosevic died, he was in a prison cell at The Hague facing war crimes charges, and it made world headlines. The May 27 passing of Guatemala’s equally genocidal dictator of the late ’70s and early ’80s, Romeo Lucas Garcia, was largely confined to the obituary pages and wire copy, and he died a free man, passing his final years in luxurious Venezuelan exile. Nothing could indicate more clearly how much cheaper life is for indigenous peoples such as his Maya Indian victims, and for those whose oppressors happen to be on the good side of US imperialism. Obits have generally noted his bloody 1980 attack on the Spanish embassy after it was occupied by Maya protesters. This is because Spanish judicial authorities would later seek his extradition over the affair. Forgotten is what the embassy occupiers were protesting–the reign of terror in the Guatemalan countryside that (carried on by Lucas Garcia’s successor Rios Montt) would ultimately leave some 50,000 dead, a million displaced and hundreds of villages destroyed. The obits have generally not used the “G word,” but the 1999 finidngs of the UN-backed Guatemala Historical Clarification Commission estimated 200,000 dead in the civil war that lasted from 1962 to 1996, squarely accusing the Guatemalan state of “genocide.” The Lucas Garcia-Rios Montt period was the bloodiest of the war, and that in which the violence was most explicitly aimed at the Maya ethnicity.

pepe escobar’s book review of mike davis’ the planet of slums: The accumulation of the wretched

Davis saves the best for last – the chapter titled “Down Vietnam Street”. Reflecting reality in the streets of the world’s hypercities, where the permanently redundant masses will never stand a chance of being included in socio-economic terms, he writes that “the late capitalist triage of humanity, then, has already taken place”. The enterprising Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has also reached the same conclusion, he notes, as a 2002 report stressed that already by the late 1990s “a staggering 1 billion workers representing one-third of the world’s labor force, most of them in the South, were either unemployed or underemployed”.
Davis remembers how the administration of US president John Kennedy “officially diagnosed Third World revolutions as ‘diseases of modernization’ and prescribed – in addition to Green Berets and B-52s – ambitious land reforms and housing programs”. Everyone living in Latin America in the 1960s remembers the dreaded Alliance for Progress – advertised US-style as a sort of Marshall Plan that would “lift pan-American living standards to southern European, if not gringo, levels”. The results were disastrous, just as the heavily advertised UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) will not be met. Davis quotes the UN’s Human Development Report 2004, which warns that measuring by recent “progress”, sub-Saharan Africa will not reach most of these goals “until well into the 22nd century”.
So we’re left with repression – the definitive neo-liberal paradigm, a literal “Great Wall” of high-tech border repression trying to suppress migration to rich countries – as in the conservative US vis-a-vis Mexico and Central America and the European Union vis-a-vis the Maghreb. Meanwhile, slum populations, according to UN-HABITAT, will keep growing at least by 25 million people a year.

swans: Open Letter To Democracy Now!: Milosevic’s Trial and Death

I sent the following letter to Democracy Now! (DN!) two months ago following their piece on Milosevic’s trial and death on March 13, 2006. I never received an answer from DN! and more importantly they have not, as far as I know, offered any corrections to the misinformation aired in the piece. It should be noted that DN! covered the trial and the demolition of the prosecution’s case about as little or less than the mainstream, corporate media.

here’s an afghan blog – http://www.afgha.com/
and a good collection of left-wing political mvmt news in latin america – Latin America News Review

Posted by: b real | May 30 2006 18:42 utc | 44

@b real – THANKS!
Lots of things I didn´t follow and would have missed.

Posted by: b | May 30 2006 18:56 utc | 45

b real
a thanks from me, aussi

Posted by: r’giap | May 30 2006 20:39 utc | 46

Don’t be dense. The saying “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” was never intended to be taken literally. If the neo-nazis started protesting against Bush (as they might for his cozying up to Israel) would you start praising them on that principle?
@TVicious:
I’ve been called worse. The proverb applies I think more to temorary alliances rather than friendships.
We could of course say:
The enemy of my enemy can be a temporary ally only to become my enemy when times change …
But it’s too damned long.
Keep your friends close – hold your enemies closer.

Posted by: Groucho | May 30 2006 20:45 utc | 47