Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
Back to Main

May 1, 2006
Packing Accomplished

Three years ago …


full

 

INTRODUCTION

The term "packing" refers to the process of creating a male-looking bulge in one’s crotch. This can be accomplished through a home-made or store-bought pants stuffer, or through a realistic-looking prosthetic device.
[…]

PACKING DEVICES: Home-made

There are affordable and realistic looking/feeling packers on the market today, but if you are very short on cash, are just starting to pack, or simply do not want to invest in a store-bought packer, the following home-made devices can serve quite adequately, and can be adjusted to your own tastes.

Socks
The use of a rolled up sock is a very inexpensive way to create a bulge. …
Packing: Creating a Realistic Bulge

Posted by b on May 1, 2006 at 16:28 UTC | Permalink
Comments

By the numbers

Posted by: b | May 1 2006 16:41 utc | 1

what is an ftm?
…and if I go look at all those penises, will have ten times the spam I’ve gotten since I went to the sex toys sight?
and…btw…I got through my mini oral exam! wheee! and I got my biggest paper finished! wheee!
and I haven’t sleep since yesterday!
zzzzzzz

Posted by: fauxreal | May 1 2006 17:13 utc | 2

ftm = female-to-male

Posted by: jonku | May 1 2006 18:34 utc | 3

good for you b. i have yet to read commentary about the bulge until now. what an unavoidable focus! the problem is clear, once they strapped all that faux gear to his chest/belly region it created the vision of an absense of cock, hence the buildup. someone should make a poster of your cropping w/some slogan ( truthieness?,info warfare?,psyops at its finest?)

Posted by: annie | May 1 2006 19:10 utc | 4

Lunchbox Linford
Lunchbox Henry
Commander in Thief

Posted by: Cloned Poster | May 1 2006 19:51 utc | 5

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Posted by: Cloned Poster | May 1 2006 19:54 utc | 6

I don’t know b. When climbing I wear a harness with straps around my upper thighs like that, and it “lifts and separates”, I imagine in the same way that a bra does. There is really no need for packing. Not that I don’t appreciate the snark.

Posted by: PeeDee | May 1 2006 22:01 utc | 7

btw, thanks for the info, jonku…you too, PeeDee.
…but I really think you should post photos to explain what you mean.
just joking…really. 🙂
…it’s all this coffee I’ve been drinking.

Posted by: fauxreal | May 2 2006 17:45 utc | 8

Can’t leave it alone fauxreal?
=)
Personally, I’m speechless.

Posted by: beq | May 2 2006 17:58 utc | 9

I really think you should post photos
ha! i actually wrote that yesterday but lost the courage to post , hit delete. but now that it’s out in the open i agree, peedee, i want to see!

Posted by: annie | May 2 2006 18:36 utc | 10

@PeeDee There is really no need for packing.
Those three last commentators did really get incited by that it seems. Post your phone number 🙂

Posted by: b | May 2 2006 19:22 utc | 11

b- don’t pimp out PeeDee.
it’s just that the three of us have the same silly sense of humor. come on, aren’t packages funny to you? –okay, well maybe not.
actually, my request is a part of some serious research beq and I are doing into…something… I learned alot from a link billmon posted the other day.
okay, that thing about doing research is a lie….sort of.
it’s just that, when someone posts something like that, I have to restrain myself from making a socially unacceptable remark. just to make it. annie did. I didn’t.
but you have to admit, it’s a great visual.
okay, I’ll stop now. in fact, I already told beq I was going to stop because I thought I was probably being offensive to some ppl–that I’d go back to our table again.
but then, I had to post that…which is where her remark came from. I’d just told her I wasn’t going to do that.
but if ppl don’t think we’re funny as humans, or that sex isn’t funny, among other things…well I guess you have more important issues to deal with. so do I, but it’s nice to have diversions.

Posted by: fauxreal | May 2 2006 22:27 utc | 12

@ faux – way to cover your…. (you know)

Posted by: beq | May 3 2006 0:29 utc | 13

not that sex is a desirable diversion, it isn’t , i mean should only be taken seriously.
to be sure, i never actually look, y’know, down there, so it would be hard for me to assess the situation, that’s the only reason a photo might be helpful, that’s all, i mean if we are going to give the topic our full consideration,(not to be confused w/research, which we are not conducting) to be fair to george and all, i think some comparison is in order, no?
and i agree completely w/fauxreal, i’ll just go back to the table also, in case we’re being too, forward (and i only say that for lack of a better term), and i take full responsibilty for bringing it up, i admit it was me not fauxreal.

Posted by: annie | May 3 2006 0:32 utc | 14

@ faux – way to cover your…. (you know)

Posted by: beq | May 3 2006 0:35 utc | 15

oh beq! (you know)
me: y’know!
great minds think alike
what a coincidence, i was preoccupied w/a kinder gentler way of approaching the situation and completely missed your comment earlier. it’s getting to be that time of the evening, perhaps i’ll skip the mint julip and order a shot of chevas, snifter of course.

Posted by: annie | May 3 2006 1:08 utc | 16

Back to Main