Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 16, 2006
Easter Walk

Of what my late father handed me down, I most value some books and a habit.

Each Easter, after a long walk through the woods, he and I opened volume 2 of his 1864 Gotha edition of Goethe’s collected works and read Faust, the Easter Walk.

The scholar Faust, he later sells his soul to the devil, is haunted by his thrieve for godlike knowledge. Thinking of suicide, happy Easter songs from outside his study remember him not on religion, but on happy moments in his childhood and stop him. He takes a Sunday walk with his student Wagner and remarks:

Loosed from their fetters are streams and rills
Through the gracious spring-tide’s all-quickening glow;
Hope’s budding joy in the vale doth blow;
Old Winter back to the savage hills
Withdraweth his force, decrepid now.

Thence only impotent icy grains
Scatters he as he wings his flight,
Striping with sleet the verdant plains;
But the sun endureth no trace of white;

Everywhere growth and movement are rife,
All things investing with hues of life:

Though flowers are lacking, varied of dye,
Their colours the motly throng supply.
Turn thee around, and from this height,
Back to the town direct thy sight.

Forth from the hollow, gloomy gate,
Stream forth the masses, in bright array.
Gladly seek they the sun to-day;
The Lord’s Resurrection they celebrate:

For they themselves have risen, with joy,
From tenement sordid, from cheerless room,
From bonds of toil, from care and annoy,
From gable and roof’s o’er-hanging gloom,
From crowded alley and narrow street,
And from the churches’ awe-breathing night,
All now have come forth into the light.

Look, only look, on nimble feet,
Through garden and field how spread the throng,
How o’er the river’s ample sheet,
Many a gay wherry glides along;

And see, deep sinking in the tide,
Pushes the last boat now away.
E’en from yon far hill’s path-worn side,
Flash the bright hues of garments gay.

Hark! Sounds of village mirth arise;
This is the people’s paradise.

Both great and small send up a cheer;
Here am I man, I feel it here.

Comments

Thank you for sharing that memory, b.
If I remember my Easter theology correctly, in the three days before the resurrection, Jesus was in hell.
A Faustian bargain with a jealous god, Yahweh. Abraham and Isaac revealed this long ago. To have faith, as Kierkegaard understand and explicated, one must be willing to be insane.
Here’s a bit of Marlowe’s Faustian tale:
Emperors and Kings,
Are but obeyed in their several provinces,
Nor can they raise the wind or rend the clouds;
But his dominion that exceeds in this,
Stretcheth as far as doth the mind of man:
A sound magician is a mighty god;
Here Faustus, try thy brains to gain a deity.

Faustus calls forth Mephistopholes, knowing what this will mean to his fate, but he tries to learn of Mephistopholes’ fate too, as one of the fallen who conspired with Lucifer.

FAUSTUS
Where are you damned?
MEPHOSTOPHILIS
In hell.
FAUSTUS
How comes it then, that thou art out of hell?
MEPHOSTOPHILIS
This is hell.

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 16 2006 20:58 utc | 1

thank you for sharing such a personal part of your life bernhard. your father must have been a very special man.
i’m on my way out to take an easter walk.

Posted by: annie | Apr 16 2006 21:01 utc | 2

slowly slowly go the horse of the night – marlowe
thanks b

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 16 2006 22:45 utc | 3

Thank you b. Happy Birthday fauxreal. On this, my birthday too, I took a walk with my mentor, Hokusai.

Posted by: beq | Apr 17 2006 1:36 utc | 4

Had to work today and was listening to a Protestant preacher on the radio. Pretty good sermon and interpretation of the resurrection really.
When I turned the radio off, my thoughts turned to Goethe’s Faust and Easter morning.
Powerful writing that.

Posted by: Groucho | Apr 17 2006 1:46 utc | 5

I know naught better on a Sunday or a holiday
Than chat of wars and warlike pother,
When off in Iraq, far away,
The people clash and fight with one another.
We stand beside the window, drain our glasses,
And see how each gay vessel down the river passes,
Then in the evening homeward wend our ways,
Blessing with joy sweet peace and peaceful days.
Yes, neighbour! I would leave things so;
Each other’s skulls they well may crack,
And everything may topsyturvy go,
If only things at home stay in the old, old track.

Posted by: annie | Apr 17 2006 1:48 utc | 6

faux! happy birthday to you too. i didn’t read the earlier post because i’ve been reading faust.

Posted by: annie | Apr 17 2006 1:52 utc | 7

i just read billmon’s FlightForward esssay and damned if my fingers werent clenched through 2 thirds of it. what a gorgeous legato flow that man can deal — but still it, as always, reads as if he’s a y3k cosmonaut sussing out the suspect scene fromthe most prime of orbits, and decked out with the supplest of instumentation, who realizes that he’s got about 81 hours of oxygen left to work with.

Posted by: bianco | Apr 17 2006 2:53 utc | 8

@bianco:
Quit it. We are discussing serious writing and writers here.
Also:
Annie has either plagarized a Pinter or written one hell of a poem.
Which it Be, Annie?

Posted by: Poet2 | Apr 17 2006 3:18 utc | 9

oh, I leap up to my god
who pulls me down

Posted by: slothrop | Apr 17 2006 3:40 utc | 10

Billmon’s The Flight Forward is certainly the description of the current neocon faustian bargain:
What we are witnessing (through rips in the curtain of official secrecy) may be an example of what the Germans call the flucht nach vorne – the “flight forward.” This refers to ta situation in which an individual or institution seeks a way out of a crisis by becoming ever more daring and aggressive (or, as the White House propaganda department might put it: “bold”) A familar analogy is the gambler in Vegas, who tries to get out of a hole by doubling down on each successive bet.
Classic historical examples of the flucht nach vornes include Napoleon’s attempt to break the long stalemate with Britain by invading Russia,the decision of the Deep South slaveholding states to secede from the Union after Lincoln’s election, and Milosevic’s bid to create a “greater Serbia” after Yugoslavia fell apart.
As these examples suggest, flights forward usually don’t end well – just as relatively few gamblers emerge from a doubling-down spree with their shirts still on their backs.

This was always the conservative complaint about Vietnam, that power was restrained when, with enough napalm, the Viet Cong would relent. Never a thought about Vietnam as a civil war.
Maybe I’m too uninformed, but I would like to know the value of any of the American military “adventures” over the last fifty or so years. What changed in the way the American power-brokers wanted? What has happened with Vietnam, except for decades of renewing a devastated land?
What has happened in Chili, in Argentina, in Nicaragua, in Cuba, in Bolivia, except the dely of a better government for those nations, govt that was hindered by American interventions to avoid the unthinkable…which was, apparently, social democracy…Chavez has oil and allies…another coup attempt, like the one on April 11, 2002, will not stop the will to self-determination.
And what about all the interference in Afghanistan, and our former allies in The Taliban and the Mujahadeen?
I would be easy to say that the United States is too inept to wage war, but it would seem to be more correct to say that the United States was outside of its constitutional boundaries to wage war in these places and in the ways they did.
No doubt Thomas Paine rolled in his grave when Reagan compared the death squads to the founders…maybe there was truth in that comment, but only in the worst of the actions of the founders, which was the compromise that allowed slavery.
The Bush junta’s great push seems to be a form of diminishing returns…and the returns are all about power, and never about freedom, no matter how the interference is justified to the American ppl.
In the conservative faustian bargain, justice from such ann act would be the spontaneous combustion of every American who supports Bush as their shadow twin is incinerated in the name of freedom.

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 17 2006 3:58 utc | 11

Thank God Easter is over.
Thoughts of God, religious mysteries,and great poetry
give way to forced feedings of mediocre political commentary.
But there is a silver lining to this cloud. A Faustian bargain of sorts.
Open season on Slotrop begins.
Some little sport and pleasure, such as it is.
@Faux:
How does any of what you say relate to an eighteenth-century poet and the deal a medieval academic made? I know, I’m A member of the fundamentalist wing of the PMLA.

Posted by: Groucho | Apr 17 2006 6:17 utc | 12

mediocre is only something you can aspire to

Posted by: DM | Apr 17 2006 7:05 utc | 13

Annie has either plagarized a Pinter or written one hell of a poem.
me? plagiarize? certainly you jest!
faux! happy birthday to you too. i didn’t read the earlier post because i’ve been reading faust.

Posted by: annie | Apr 17 2006 8:34 utc | 14

is groucho tempting sloth to a duel?
Thank God Easter is over.
wasting no time i see. boys will be boys

Posted by: annie | Apr 17 2006 8:46 utc | 15

We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats’ feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar

Posted by: Lupin | Apr 17 2006 9:32 utc | 16

b’s summoning of Faust leads me to the director of Mephisto, thoughts in a new film series.
[In] a scene halfway through István Szabó’s latest film, Taking Sides: The Case Furtwängler (2001, Germany-France)…[ ]the American interrogator Major Steve Arnold confronts the legendary German conductor and music director of the Berlin Philharmonic with the question why he did not leave Germany despite of his disapproval of the Nazi regime. Wilhelm Furtwängler’s answer is humble and simple: because I am not Jewish and because I tried to help from inside. The crucial moral choice, involved in one’s decision to leave one’s country, the choice that could make or break a human being, has been one of the central themes of Szabó’s oeuvre since Lovefilm (1970).
Szabó discussed his life in Hungary after the revelation that he was coerced to inform for the Hungarian police to protect friends who were involved in the failed 1956 revolution.
–liberal Americans are having the same conversations that occurred in Europe during the last century, aren’t they (we)? …leave if you can, or stay if you should…
Szabó came to mind because he also made the great film, Mephisto, based upon Klaus Mann’s version of Faustus, and the contemporary experience of Mann and his brother-in-law.
The director would seem to be a character study for Hannah Arendt’s view of Totalitarianism
For Arendt, the popular appeal of totalitarian ideologies with their capacity to mobilize populations to do their bidding, rested upon the devastation of ordered and stable contexts in which people once lived. The impact of the First World War, and the Great Depression, and the spread of revolutionary unrest, left people open to the promulgation of a single, clear and unambiguous idea that would allocate responsibility for woes, and indicate a clear path that would secure the future against insecurity and danger. Totalitarian ideologies offered just such answers, purporting discovered a ‘key to history’ with which events of the past and present could be explained, and the future secured by doing history’s or nature’s bidding. Accordingly the amenability of European populations to totalitarian ideas was the consequence of a series of pathologies that had eroded the public or political realm as a space of liberty and freedom. These pathologies included the expansionism of imperialist capital with its administrative management of colonial suppression, and the usurpation of the state by the bourgeoisie as an instrument by which to further its own sectional interests. This in turn led to the delegitimation of political institutions, and the atrophy of the principles of citizenship and deliberative consensus that had been the heart of the democratic political enterprise. The rise of totalitarianism was thus to be understood in light of the accumulation of pathologies that had undermined the conditions of possibility for a viable public life that could unite citizens, while simultaneously preserving their liberty and uniqueness (a condition that Arendt referred to as ‘plurality’).
Although Karl Popper (and his liberal democracy-open society) has his critics here, where does the individual in a society find another way to at least the “shadow experience” of personal freedom within human societies as we have known them?
It seems that it is only with the erosion of the belief in a government founded upon such liberal democracy that the U.S. has been able to move from (at least the lip service, if not the the fact often enough) the belief in increasing the ideals of its founding to more and different people to creating a walled-off Gilead.
Did Arendt or Habermas read the world with greater accuracy? Did Habermas make his own faustian bargain, I wonder.

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 17 2006 13:05 utc | 17

my easter moment of superpedantry:
marlowe was quoting ovid, amores, 1.13 viz.
“lente currite, noctis equi!” (“run slowly, horses of the night”)
translation

Posted by: Dismal Science | Apr 17 2006 15:22 utc | 18

thanks dismal i was remembering it from over thirty years ago -some scene =richard burton in an awful movie adaption & about the only latin i half remember

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 17 2006 16:19 utc | 19

@Annie:
Well it did sound a lot like Pinter rythm-wise.
And someone did a little editing.
Lot like TS Eliot for that matter:
In the room the women come and go,
Talking of Michaelangelo.
Thank God, DS, I never got into Latin.
And in the interest of proletarian solidarity, I will unilaterally declare a 6 month truce with comrade slothrop, reserving my soverign right of preemption ,of course, in the event of unprovoked aggression.

Posted by: Groucho | Apr 18 2006 0:24 utc | 20

Always one to be a little left field or off key, when adding to the comments/discourse…
In a Dark Time … The Eye Begins to See, wrote Ginsberg’…
oh so very true…
CELEBRATING 50 YEARS OF HOWL! and The ‘Howl’ heard round the world

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Apr 18 2006 10:47 utc | 21

Just struggling along, Uncle.
Blind in the ear and deaf in the eye.
Or maybe both.
Howling is fun, though.

Posted by: Groucho | Apr 19 2006 2:38 utc | 22

r’giap – it’s practically the only line of latin i remember from years of classics tuition at school – it hit us like a ton of bricks the day we read it – i think it’s supposed to refer to apollo’s chariot bringing the sunrise each day, but for some reason we read it as “night mares”!

Posted by: Dismal Science | Apr 19 2006 11:42 utc | 23

Dismal Science- your version has a long history, too. The Incubus, or night mare, or night crusher (or Succubus, for vulnerable males) was such a danger, the church had to mention the problem.
Shakespeare sweetened the idea with the legend of Queen Mab in Romeo and Juliet, marking the move from Medieval to Renaissance, but the 18th century returned to an idea of the incubus as metaphor…Marlowe’s incantations were their inspirations, it would seem.
… on his Night-Mare, through the evening fog,
Flits the squab fiend o’er fen, and lake, and bog,
Seeks some love-wilder’d Maid with sleep oppress’d,
Alights, and grinning sits upon her breast.
— Such as of late amid the murky sky
Was mark’d by FUSELI’s poetic eye;
Whose daring tints, with SHAKESPEARS’s happiest grace,
Gave to the airy phantom form and place

Erasmus Darwin
The Loves of the Plants 1789
And Blake used the night mare, or incubus, in his engravings…
How’s that for pedantry? Actually, I find those little factoidals fascinating. Queen Mab, in Celtic tradition, was also an embodiment of female “power” over males– they were captured by her monthly blood…or maybe its source…
How our cultures have imagined the world through time is, as Stephen Daedelus called history, “the nightmare from which I am trying to awake.”
Can any modern person imagine women or sex or desire without all the hateful propaganda from the church…or from Roman myths that informed the church’s views?
Althusser understood this, too, in his explications of ideology. It is nearly impossible to rise above culturally historical views that are then imbedded in someone’s present…it takes greater effort than most people would prefer to exert.

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 19 2006 13:36 utc | 24

thx faux – erasmus darwin, now there’s an interesting fellow. i visited his house a few years back, which is now a museum, in lichfield, staffs. he kind of came up w/ a theory of evolution several decades before it was taken up by his ancestor, charles. very clever family altogether.
if you are into the goth fuseli and others, there is a big show of their works (“gothic nightmares”) on at the moment in london at the old tate – i am going next week i think

Posted by: Dismal Science | Apr 19 2006 16:28 utc | 25

this thread is long gone, but here goes anyway.
Dismal Science–I’m not a fan of Fuseli, but I am interested in the interlocking groups of ppl who created “the modern” in so many ways…
the lunar society (scientific method(ists), the radical dissenters (unitarians/separaters of church and staters, and most of all universal suffrage supporters), the utilitarian philosophers, Godwin’s ur-anarachy, Wollstonecraft’s ur-feminism, Fuseli fueling the idea of a modern psyche..(Freud had a copy of The Nightmare in his study),
then melting into Goya’s classical revaluation of revolutions, Blake’s reverse etching technique and his madness with the bliss.
But, yes, Erasmus was definitely onto something before Charles. He met with the Lunar Society (James Watt, Priestly, etc.). Interestingly, the scientific advances of the time occurred among those who were not at the great Universities b/c of their nonconformist ideas re: religion…the Anglicans concentrated at Oxford and Cambridge and nodded as Edmund Burke wrote so that George Will would have a job in days of future past.
I love the eroticization of the study of botany at the time. It was SCANALOUS that girls should study botany…with boys present!! talking about sexual organs!!! Botanizing!! 🙂
Those radicals… thinking that females should be allowed an educatino beyond needlework…
the strange thing, to me, is to know ppl in American today basically advocate this same thing still. A zombie version was on the Colbert Report last night. Her way to sell herself and her backasswardness was the use of the word “nookie” at every opportunity.

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 20 2006 13:02 utc | 26

…And moving aside, he switched on the strong electric lights. The class-room was distinct and hard, a strange place after the soft dim magic that filled it before he came. Birkin turned curiously to look at Ursula. Her eyes were round and wondering, bewildered, her mouth quivered slightly. She looked like one who is suddenly wakened. There was a living, tender beauty, like a tender light of dawn shining from her face. He looked at her with a new pleasure, feeling gay in his heart, irresponsible.
`You are doing catkins?’ he asked, picking up a piece of hazel from a scholar’s desk in front of him. `Are they as far out as this? I hadn’t noticed them this year.’
He looked absorbedly at the tassel of hazel in his hand.
`The red ones too!’ he said, looking at the flickers of crimson that came from the female bud.
Then he went in among the desks, to see the scholars’ books. Ursula watched his intent progress. There was a stillness in his motion that hushed the activities of her heart. She seemed to be standing aside in arrested silence, watching him move in another, concentrated world. His presence was so quiet, almost like a vacancy in the corporate air.
Suddenly he lifted his face to her, and her heart quickened at the flicker of his voice.
`Give them some crayons, won’t you?’ he said, `so that they can make the gynaecious flowers red, and the androgynous yellow. I’d chalk them in plain, chalk in nothing else, merely the red and the yellow. Outline scarcely matters in this case. There is just the one fact to emphasise.’
`I haven’t any crayons,’ said Ursula.

Women in Love -D.H. Lawrence
No wonder. 🙂

Posted by: beq | Apr 20 2006 13:27 utc | 27

dismal
i remember when it is spoken in marlowe & it carried a dread that has been with me all thes years & i shouldn’t be so scurrilous with the burton faustus – perhaps richard had other questions on his mind – but you really felt like a man who had sold his soul
i love my marlowe & am a sucker for macbeth – the blood of our times not so so different from today & tommorrow & tommorrow & tommorrow
fauxreal
i hope the lettre à franca have ssome possibility of being translated into english – they are truly blakean in their fury & like elizabeth bishop in their toughness

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Apr 20 2006 22:54 utc | 28

thanks beq. you shared a story of your father, b too. here’s mine. my father was a fan of lawrence and as a result i inherited his collection. lady chatterley’s lover (w/ my kirmish w/jolly rogers) has an unusual cover of cardboard and twine w/no identifying features or printing and frankly the history of it’s hidden and disguised road from europe make it all the more cherished by me.
but my favorite book my father ever gave me (as one of 4 girls a true honor) is my cherished first edition (forum 1944, not the knopf) of the virgin and the gypsy
i was 12, and thought i’d gone to heaven!!!!!

When the vicar’s wife went off with a young and penniless man the scandal knew no bounds. Her two little girls were only seven and nine years old respectively. And the vicar was such a good husband. True, his hair was grey. But his moustache was dark, he was handsome, and still full of furtive passion for his unrestrained and beautiful wife.
Why did she go? Why did she burst away with such an éclat of revulsion, like a touch of madness?
Nobody gave any answer. Only the pious said she was a bad woman. While some of the good women kept silent. They knew.

included in the edition is the short story ‘the woman who rode away’. ahhhhh!!!

Posted by: annie | Apr 21 2006 1:22 utc | 29

rgiap- The letters sound interesting — I looked for them online, and tho their publication is already a decade old, it doesn’t look like they’re available in English.
They wouldn’t be the regular bedside table reading for most ppl, and graduate students are supposed to read in the original language (tho I wonder how many read/read Barthes or Foucault in French).
Interestingly, anything by Foucault is still rarely if ever available locally as a used book…this means that ppl are still holding on to him…his words.
And for you D.H. devotees:
How beautiful maleness is, if it finds its right expression.
yes.

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 21 2006 2:14 utc | 30

`I haven’t any crayons,’ said Ursula.
When a family library was divided, long ago, nobody objected if my father had first run at it. Nobody cared.
I took first edition Sax Rohmer, at papas suggestion.
Adventurous reading for a child. My older cousin got some kind of leather bound edition of Shakespeare.
When the old man died young, fifteen years later, I had the task of cleaning out his desk.
Found a well-preserved copy of the obituary of Wild Bill Donovan, and some letters of commendation and awards from several governments. Never had figured out, up to that time, what the old man had been about in the war. He never talked about it much.
And some letters, from a very attractive female “friend”, which would have given Mama hyper-vapours, had she seen them.
And yes, the first edition Rohmer were a better investment, all the way around.
Alas, Annie, Not a D.H. Lawrence in the collection.
Thanks Bernhard and everyone else, for thoughts about parents and Easter morning.

Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 21 2006 3:16 utc | 31

annie- fwiw- first copies of LCL were privately printed in Florence, Italy in 1928. immediately afterward, various printers pirated copies.
the full text of the book wasn’t legally available in the UK until the 1960s.
my exposure to “literary” erotica at 12 was not quite the same as yours, annie. I was staying at my older sister’s place in the summer (I always stayed there so that I could ride horses). In the china cabinet in the dining room, I found a stack of pulp paperbacks with lurid covers.
These weren’t romance novels with busted bodices…these books were probably pornographic back then — only a decade past Bettie Page. I listened for anyone who might discover me as I lay on the dining room floor and read them all. I have no idea what the titles were, what the words were, who the authors were. I don’t think that was the point, tho.
To this day I have an affection for pulp novel covers. Someone here has taken copies (I hope, and not the originals) of pulp paperback covers and made them the sides of stiff little pocketbooks…the kind you put your lipstick in, not the kind you carry in your pocket and read.

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 21 2006 5:15 utc | 32

faux, my copy says privately printed 1929.
the text of my skirmish of w/jolly roger is an explanation by lawrence of the various pirated copies “that i now bring out this cheap popular edition, produced in france and offered to the public at sixty fancs”
my older sister was into pulp fiction, hiding it and reading under the covers w/a flashlight. i was a little wilder. wasn’t much interested in books @12. i think my dad gave me the book because he was afraid the ‘education’ i was getting from the neighbor boys wasn’t to his liking!

Posted by: annie | Apr 21 2006 10:33 utc | 33

What a cool dad, annie! I remember seeing the movie because I’d seen Joanna Shimkus in a French film (can’t remember which) and liked her. The Virgin and the Gypsy blew me away [Franco Nero!]and so I started plowing through [pun intended 😉 ] everything D.H. wrote. [I’ve bookmarked your link, thanks 🙂 ]What a treasure your book is. I have a copy (video) of Women in Love. I always liked the scene where Hermione demonstrates the proper way to eat a fig. Not in the book, I believe.
anonymous – a cautionary tale: In college I worked one summer in the Sociology department of my university. I got the job of cataloging the books in the office of the deceased head of the department. A very kind and thoughtful man, by the way. I started at the top of the shelves and worked my way down, taking each book and adding it to my list. I got to one shelf and discovered behind the texts a stack of paperbacks with the covers removed (alas, fauxreal). Well, they were related to sociology but not in a particularly academic way. =) So I slipped them into a paper bag and took them home. I don’t remember how I eventually released them but I got to thinking, what if I die…

Posted by: beq | Apr 21 2006 11:46 utc | 34

Good advice,Beq. I’ll get the fiendish doctor to Stealth coat my Anais Ninn.

Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 21 2006 12:31 utc | 35

annie- privately published in Paris, 1929, by Lecram Press or Black Manikin? (noted on the back cover). With a phoenix on the front cover? originally 60 francs.
3000 copies of this version were printed in May. another 6000 copies were printed when the May version sold out…

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 21 2006 12:42 utc | 36

Now for something really Naughty
on Easter morning.
Just bounced out of Today’s Post. Think she was mentioned upthread.

Posted by: Groucho | Apr 21 2006 13:21 utc | 37

Better Bettie
…as in, which Bettie Page are you?
now I have to go to sleep. but I did get a big project finished, in between coming to the moon to entertain myself.

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 21 2006 13:49 utc | 38

faux, the cover in cardboard connected w/thick cotton string crudly tied w/no mention of either lecram or manikin.
copyright by D. H. lawrence, which sounds rather odd. the only thing remaining of the original cover is the back of the binding area which looks a dull brown or black but the only way i would be able to view it is to remove the cardboard and string which runs thru the pages. probably not worth much except to me. my sister got a copy of one w/a sleave that says something like popular english verses, and then you open it and the book is inside. i will try to remember to ask her. one of my sisters, the greediest no doubt, who fights tooth and nails for everything of value and proceeds to auction items or sell them at flea markets which drives me nuts. all the books of his in my possesion that were not specifically given to me i have ‘stolen’ from the collection assure they are kept in the family, because my older sister (flashlight/pulp) is also a card &1/2 but alas i digress.
What a cool dad, annie! i’ll say
a true story
my father’s death was a trying and emotional time w/ many regrets and jealousies .my older sister has an overly flowery presence in script and had just finished reading me the eulogy she had prepared. i wanted to contribute to his eulogy but where to even begin, what to say and how to say it w/out breaking down? we were in his apartment w/an entire wall of his books. i was complaining to my sister ‘what can i say?’, i turned and grabbed a book, very randomly yet twain naturally caught my attention (you had to know my dad).
i grabbed the innocence abroad (american publishing 1869) and just opened it to a page (647, chapter LXI) never even heard of it before.

The grand pilgrimage is over. Good-bye to it, and a pleasant memory to it, I am able to say in all kindness. I bear no malice, no ill-will toward any individual that was connected with it, either as passenger or officer. Things I did not like at all yesterday I like very well to-day, now that I am at home, and always hereafter I shall be able to poke fun at the whole gang if the spirit so moves me to do, without ever saying a malicious word. The expedition accomplished all that its programme promised that it should accomplish, and we ought all to be satisfied with the management of the matter, certainly. Bye-bye!

the chapter title? ‘An Obituary’
once again, my father came thru for me. when i read the passage everyone recongnized his voice and disposition immediately. in person, and on the phone, he almost always departed w/ a cheery “bye-bye”

Posted by: annie | Apr 22 2006 1:23 utc | 39

it has to be the Paris version, annie.
I have issued you a passport to nerdistan, btw, at le speak. you obviously could not cross the border otherwise.
I have to work now, tho.
when my dad died, everyone behaved. it was when my stepmother was dying of cancer and I drove down five hours on weekends, and my sister flew up from Houston on weekdays and my sister-in-law, whose husband was my father’s stepson…I’ve mentioned that weirdness before…anyway, she and my half sister slept there…we all took turns in the hospital… to help out while her own son couldn’t deal with it (but could organize a pro-am golf tourney) that we had “issues.” I made him go pick up her morphine, tho, when I was there because I also had a baby and a toddler with me.
the doctor, btw, seemed to prescribe a LOT of morphine…I think he was giving her an option she never took.
no one in my family collects books but me. I give them all collectible books for christmas presents, tho, pop-ups, actually, so I guess they do collect that way. they like them and look forward to them, I know…cause when I don’t mail them before Christmas they ask if they’re on the way.
btw, Maurice Sendak is releasing a pop-up book in Sept. it’s his first, but his characters were already used in a pop-up book about the brooklyn public library. Really Rosie and Pierre (I don’t care) was there.
this is my equivalent of nervous chatter and procrastination.
must. work.

Posted by: fauxreal | Apr 22 2006 1:39 utc | 40