|
What Topics?
What to blog about?
There are lots of stuff one rightly could and should be outraged about:
- The Katrina video proves Bush lied when he said "Nobody anticipated the breach of the levees". As a scandal within the scandal, the "big-three" papers don´t even mention it.
- More and more proof Bush lied about Iraq WMDs.
- Alberto Gonzales lied to Congress about domestic spying. That’s why he didn´t had to take an oath.
- Various Representatives and Senators are selling appropriations for campaign money.
- Bush’s ratings are at pony manure level, but the so called opposition party doesn´t even take note and keeps voting against its interests.
The sheer number of scandals is overwhelming and paralyzing. One hardly takes note anymore, when a something new comes up.
So I try to pick things that are a bit outside that range. International issues like Iraq/Iran/Palestine, the Dubai deal, a Turkish movie or longterm stuff like water or some economic bits.
But does this fit this blog’s readers? I am not sure. So here is my question to you:
What would you blog about and/or what topics you like to read/discuss about under the moon?
Not that I will obliged to follow your advise 🙂 But I could use some hints to keep going.
Bernhard, you are doing a splendid job. Thank you. Your work has contributed to enlighment and learning for many, myself, and others I am sure.
Limitations and difficulties arise from the very nature of the board, a discussion of mainstream news, sometimes, its ‘alternative’ counterpart. As the news is crap, fatigue is bound to set in, some snippets are seen as important, others are left aside, the choice is difficult. A hard slog.
Well annie I felt I maybe chased ppl away with 9/11 posts and tried to keep it cool. Billmon, for example, believes the official version, as far as I could see (unless he has changed his mind recently and not posted about it.)
I know some of my posts may seem weird, or not up to the intellectual standards du jour. Some are badly written as well. My point has always been that no cogent analysis is possible if one starts off with false premises, i.e. that muslim fundamentalists filled with hate for freedoms flew planes into the WTC. That did not happen, and yet is is the defining fact of history 2000 – today. It is lynchpin event, conditions what came after, and how the ‘before’ is viewed.
There is no point, no point at all, in hand wringing about lousy, complicit media, about corrupt Gvmt, about local scandals (taxes, social security, scamming, Diebold machines, etc. etc.) , when the US invaded two countries, is set to invade another (still don’t believe in that btw), killing an untold numbers of people, all on the basis of a myth, upheld both by left and right, by rednecks and progressives, company CEO’s, local police, grannys in the sewing club, and little children who scream Ay-rabs have cooties.
It sounds tinny, it is tiring. Hollow.
Ultimately, it also illustrates why a board like this will ultimately die out – or why right now B. is tired or hesitant – it is impossible to continue behaving as if one was in stable world, where Gvmt. was basically necessary and right, democracy shines its beacon or light on the hill, or whatever, but where rogues like Rove or Cheney (btw, the second most powerful man in the world..) might just for personal revenge leak the name of a CIA operative (Plame) … but putting them in jail for it seems intractably — hum difficult. Impossible. It is impossible: these people are masters (perhaps temporary and to be replaced, the figure itself means little), they are the overlords, they are immune, and if they like to pretend that the rule of law still pertains (e.g. Fitz and his fizzy christmas crackers) is is only to fool, bamboozle and distract.
Posted by: Noisette | Mar 3 2006 20:38 utc | 26
|