Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 30, 2006
Hindsight

Prewar:

The memo indicates the two leaders envisioned a quick victory and a transition to a new Iraqi government that would be complicated, but manageable. Mr. Bush predicted that it was "unlikely there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups." Mr. Blair agreed with that assessment.
Bush Was Set on Path to War, British Memo Says, NYT, March 27, 2006

Postwar:

Today, some Americans ask whether removing Saddam caused the divisions and instability we’re now seeing. In fact, much of the animosity and violence we now see is the legacy of Saddam Hussein.

The argument that Iraq was stable under Saddam and that stability is now in danger because we removed him is wrong.
President Discusses Democracy in Iraq with Freedom House, March 29, 2006

via Froomkin

Update:

But I would ask people to, to look at the perspective here of what is really going on in Iraq. Under this, the violence—under the specter of this violence, you have Iraqis now—Sunnis, Shia, Kurds and others—determined to form a government of national unity. That’s extraordinary in Iraq’s history where they’ve always settled their differences by violence, not by politics.
Rice on Meet The Press, March 26, 2006

Comments

Bush trying to blame Saddam’s legacy for the internecine violence?
Rule one rule of leadership: when you take control, you take control of everything. And everything becomes your responsibility. Trying to shunt the blame onto Saddam borders on cowardice.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Mar 30 2006 19:58 utc | 1

Rule number one of Bush’s leadership: Everything bad that happens is someone else’s fault — most likely, Bill Clinton.

Posted by: Joe F | Mar 30 2006 22:50 utc | 2

“So the same person who didn’t see it coming (((Bush))) , now says it was foreordained — and not his fault.”
The Froomkin summation of the arguments and speech is precious.
My “(((Bush)))” inserted.
You couldn’t find a clown like this at Ringling Bros.

Posted by: Groucho | Mar 31 2006 1:49 utc | 3

The Whitehouse crew realises that with the current situation of state generated fear n loathing all Dubya has to do is make a statement which sounds as though it could be credible if everyone is blind, ‘n wearing sun-glasses, down a dark alley at midnight and a substantial proportion of the population will jump at the opportunity to continue with unreality.
The alternative (truth) is just too grim to bear.

Posted by: Anonymous | Mar 31 2006 2:51 utc | 4

So let’s continue with Bush’s logic: the current animosity and violence in Israel and Palestine is the legacy of the British Empire, that created a state of fear and oppression.
And Louis XVI is responsible for the rioting in France…

Posted by: ralphieboy | Mar 31 2006 5:10 utc | 5

@ralphieboy
You jest, but I’ve seen serious historians lay World War II squarely at the feet of Otto von Bismarck. There’s no end to the human species’ ability to pass the buck… and if I were a member of the Bush Dynasty, I’d be grasping at any straw I could not to take responsibility for this level of fuck-uppery.

Posted by: Monolycus | Mar 31 2006 5:17 utc | 6

If only the Sargon I had hung there for a few more millennia we would’t be in this mess.

Posted by: brian boru | Mar 31 2006 6:08 utc | 7

You (Americans) are not “in mess”…You still live (your small consumer’s of “made in China” life) Iraqis are dieing. You keep forgetting that those hundreds of thousands children women and man in Iraq will never be alive again…It’s not stupid Hollywood move…
You are OK…all you have to worry is housing bubble, stock market and who celebrities are fucking…Iraq is in the mess that can not be repaired and will continue to die long after your Army leave their bloody job just to move somewhere else! You still sleep well at night, so I wouldn’t worry about you too much.
Even if you really genuinely want to change anything at all now it’s just not possible. It does not make any difference who ever you vote there next (except MAYBE for your local issues)…

Posted by: vbo | Mar 31 2006 13:01 utc | 8

Monolycus,
yes, and there’s an entire religion that lays all of humanity’s probems at the feet of two folks who once lived in the Garden of Eden, which many biblical scholars believe was located somewhere in Iraq…

Posted by: ralphieboy | Mar 31 2006 14:44 utc | 9

Ah, here we go again with the putting people into the nation bubble debate.
“You’ve no right to say anything because your lot doesn’t know suffering…” Yeah, and that leaves a whole, vast galaxy of positive things anyone can say in response.
Sure, okay, you’re right. No American has ever suffered. We’re just like what you see on television; we’re all rich and have unlimited privilege. We don’t bleed, never go hungry, and never die. We made up the whole Katrina thing because we were competing with the Asians after the 2004 tsunami. You caught us. We’ll just leave this blog now because there is nothing we can say about any issue since every one of us has the same standard of living as a Bush. I’m sure the debate will be much more pure when it’s just you martyrs here.
Cut me some slack. You’re Australian, right? You’re an accent away from being a Yank, too. Get over yourself.

Posted by: Monolycus | Mar 31 2006 14:45 utc | 10

@ralphieboy
Sorry, you stepped in there while I was rising to vbo’s hateful bait. The above wasn’t directed at you.
And yeah. Organised religion is not exempt from the great passage of the buck; they’ve elevated it to an art.

Posted by: Monolycus | Mar 31 2006 14:47 utc | 11

I was actually loathe to pull up this site today, being more than a little embarrassed for letting myself get all riled up like that yesterday. And for once, I’m actually gratified that nobody responded to me. I had visions of an angry free-for-all and nobody to blame for bringing down the discussion but myself. Sometimes, I don’t give you guys enough credit.
Anyway, now that I’ve gotten that ugly little catharsis out of the way…
@ralphieboy
I don’t want to keep beating a dead horse here (well, not publicly anyway), but my mind is still spinning on this buck-passage concept. While there might be some small merit to these mental exercise of relationships, there does come a point where one is dealing less with the historical and more with the hysterical. I’ll have to bone up on my Aristotle, but there are different kinds of causes for things (efficient and necessary are the only ones coming to my mind), and I think the fallacy involved here is picking the wrong one to describe why any event occurs. This has, as I’ve mentioned, the benefit of absolving anyone present from bearing any personal responsibility… which is odd, then, that this tactic gets used as often as it does by a political party that has been so vociferous about identifying itself with “personal responsibility”. Is this any more than garden variety hypocrisy, or is there something larger than that behind it?

Posted by: Monolycus | Apr 1 2006 3:50 utc | 12

vbo is expressing what milliions feel. I realise natural doesn’t make right, and everything is more complicated than that.
Many warned that if Bush was elected a second time opinion in the previously pro-American West, the man-on-the street opinion, would turn against ordinary Americans. These would still be well treated individually, or as members of groups who were familiar (engineers, etc.) That turned out to be the case.
If America is the greatest democracy – and it takes great pains to present itself as such – and then compounds folly (first Bush election, which was decried only somewhat later) with war-mongering (second), it must be the people, and not the system (democracy, cherished by all) that is to blame. Many people – around me anyway – have never heard of Diebold and are astonished when I tell them the elections were stolen. Some of them remember Florida as the land of the hanging chad, but not more. After all, a democracy has procedures to deal with that kind of thing, and Americans love to make a huge fuss about Gvmt. and so on – they are agressive, loud mouthed, have a free press, tend to argue and blame and indulge in conspiracies, is the pov. (Contrary to the Swiss who never say anything at all and rely on procedure and voting on minutiae to get them through.)
Many here can’t imagine that Americans might be prisoners of the system (or of a criminal class) as that couldn’t happen to them, couldn’t happen in a democracy. (Never mind the huge differences between the two countries.) They blame Bush and those who voted for him, as well as all those who didn’t vote at all. (Ignoring civic duty!) Additonally, they can’t understand why Americans don’t do anything – they have representatives, they can publish what they like, etc. etc. Most of them must be for the killing in Iraq, or at least happily ignoring it.
These attitudes are short-sighted, simplistic, and confortable. (I’m not saying they are vbo’s, but that of some ppl in CH.) They are also politically correct – blame Bush, excuse Europe’s seeming impotency, etc.

Posted by: Noisette | Apr 1 2006 9:19 utc | 13

vbo is of Serbian origin, I believe.
Not sure how or when she got to Australia, but it may have something to do with the destruction of former Yugoslavia, where the US and others waged a prototype “humanitarian war for democracy” (aka force-backed neolib intervention) a decade ago.
A friend of mine who lives in what is now Croatia (I spent some time there both before and after the civil war) is adamant that she would like the old communist regime back (with a few modifications, natch), is fed up with constant unemployment and low living standards.
I guess for some people the cost of what the US is selling is just too high.

Posted by: Dismal Science | Apr 1 2006 12:56 utc | 14

Maybe Monolycus was just having an off moment but there was no need to be so aggressive towards a long standing poster like vbo. Maybe Monolycus thinks that verbally bullying people who come from other places whenever they venture an opinion is the way to go but it actually isn’t.
Now that you’ve ‘acted out’ and ‘feel better about yourself’, now that you’ve done the tired old ‘feeling powerful by bullying someone else’ routine (and as you learned, it doesn’t really make you feel good, does it?), you might want to consider apologizing to vbo for the offensive tone of your reply.
Unless you want to think you’re the cyberworld’s policeman, crushing criticisms of the U.S.A. and driving off ‘foreigners’ who don’t see the world as you do, that is. Some people like the idea of a community of different voices here and evidently some don’t.

Posted by: HS | Apr 1 2006 13:10 utc | 15

Mono á mono,
The point is that when you have invaded a country, toppled the government and set up an occupation force, you have renounced all claims to blame the problems there on somebody else. Anybody else.
To an extent, Bush is right that Saddam’s reign of terror contributed to the problems there, but the problems that currently exist can be credited to Bush and nobody else (well, maybe Tony Blair)

Posted by: ralphieboy | Apr 1 2006 16:45 utc | 16

@HS
I’ve seen this same counterproductive argument too many times in the past, and the only thing that I am sorry for is the fact that, once again, I am the one who rose to the bait. I certainly do not owe anyone an apology if they came looking for a fight and I happened to give it to them.
I’m also sick of being called “cyberworld policeman” or “thought police” when I have asked for the same kind of respect that someone else is demanding. This has happened far too many times now and it is the height of hypocrisy for anyone to tell me to shut up because I am interfering with their free speech.
Maybe Bernhard was correct… we do seem to be repeating ourselves. If you think it’s a productive solution to blame the American people for everything their unchecked government does, that’s your own affair, but to me it smacks of the same hideous bigotry that causes the Right to demonise all members of Islam because of the unrepresentative actions of a few.
I’ve appreciated the community and cherished the debates here for the most part, but we’re within a hairsbreadth now of the “Stalinist fruitcake” level of discussion we’ve seen before. And I won’t be any more a part of it.
Tschüs.

Posted by: Monolycus | Apr 1 2006 17:41 utc | 17

@Monolycus – please stay. I do value your comments!
I think vbo was a bit over the top in his statement. We have seen much better comments from him.
I doubt there was need for third parties to step in.
Putting all “Americans” “Germans” “Whatever” in one pod is usually dumb.
But I, as most other people, do it too form time to time. Usually when in a bad mood or outraged for some other reason or just for lazyness in thought and speech.
On the other side I do get furious when I get congratulations or get damned because something former or current German governments have done or do.
Again Monolycus – please stay. vbo – please stay.

Posted by: b | Apr 1 2006 18:08 utc | 18

I tried to just ignore vbo’s bile spewage. Shame it had to drag down the otherwise friendly and civil level of discourse around here.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Apr 1 2006 18:42 utc | 19

I will chime in too. vbo expressed something that she can see much more clearly than we can. she has experienced life in a socialist country as well as whatever you want to call Australia. I doubt there are any others who post here that can say the same or similar.
US citizens have for the most part, a very high opinion of themselves and it really hurts to find out there are big ugly warts on what you always thought was beautiful. No one wants to hear that their baby is ugly.
I remember sitting with friends celebrating Thanksgiving not too many years ago. We were having a pretty nice time with good food and good company. I remarked to my guests that it seemed really weird that no more than 200 miles away our warplanes were dropping bombs on the Serbs. No one really seemed to be taken aback by this and the subject was soon changed. So…for someone like vbo or her family who has been on the receiving end of US noble intentions I can fully understand why there may be a little bitterness and cynicism about the agonising we all do here from the comforts of our homes or offices.
Take a deep breath, it aint personal. As Jack Nicholson’s character in “Mars Attacks” said, why can’t we all just get along?

Posted by: dan of steele | Apr 1 2006 19:36 utc | 20

I also reckon that it would be a loss to the MoA if vbo and Monolycus would stay away, I found their/your posts always worth reading and thinking about, with the ones in this thread being no exception. I’ve had to endure some friendly fire in my blogsphere life time, but hey, happens to the best of us that we write or read something seemingly offending, and the good thing about a blog, and one would think the Moon in particular, is that you can talk about issues and debate their various angles, controversial or not.
I understand vbo’s reasoning to a certain degree. Remarks by USAmericans like “we are in big trouble” etc. have not the same meaning as when an Iraqi or Afghani person make such a comment. Even if you are in the low income bracket in the US, you’d still have running water and the fridge would be running all day in the summer heat. Vbo was actually refering to a statement by ‘brian boru’, expressing that he reckons we would be in a mess. I have no idea whom brian is including in the we, but he could have meant Europe, Australia, Canada, the world even is in a mess. Vbo assumed he meant the USA and pointed out that compared with the mess many other countries and their citicens find themselves in, the real deep shit end of things, the US doesn’t fare too badly and the worries of Average Homer in the US are different to the worries of the Average Omar in Iraq. And in that regard vbo is right. Here in Australia the anti-war faction is faced with an almost identical dilemma as our US or British friends, and that is that we live in a nation where the leaders who went to war against all good advice, leaders who are responsible for tens of thousands of death, who lie and cheat at any given opportunity, were re-elected, had their disregard for human life rubberstamped by their electorate, of which we are part of.
In Oz the opposition to John Howard’s Liberals, the Australian Labor Party, has been crowing ever since the Iraq war weant pear shaped that if they’d be in power they would reduce/withdraw the troop support for the coalition. The very same ALP however had no issues with the war being started in the first place, similar to the Democrats in the US. Neither in the US nor in Australia is there currently an opposition that is worth its name. Four times did Howard get elected, you’d have to say that a large portion of Australia seems to identify with that man and his policies, especially since the other 40% vote for an opposition that is at best the lesser evil by a fraction or so.
From the outside looking in, seeing by world standards rich and comfortable people arguing amongst themselves if it is OK to impose with all means dominance on other countries, while its troops are doing it anyway, can give one the urge to write a comment like vbo’s. Despite its merit, I don’t quite agree with it, as it stereotypes and dishes out collective guilt, something that as a German living in Australia I know a little bit about. I suppose we all pidgeonhole people on the odd occassion, its hard not to, I possibly even did it in this post.

Posted by: Feelgood | Apr 3 2006 2:29 utc | 21

@Feelgood,
Well, FG, we can play these little feel good games forever.
It’s like the old joke for some fast food restaurant here, can’t remember which, which was about growing up and in relative privation ,which began:
YOU HAD SHOES!!?
That being said, if you and vbo get down to the last roo, despairing like, no routgut to chase it down, and winter coming on
Don’t despair. I’ll send you both the last bullet, FedEx air, my expense.

Posted by: Groucho | Apr 3 2006 3:16 utc | 22

I also reckon that it would be a loss to the MoA if vbo and Monolycus would stay away,
i very much second this. so much of communication is done thru voice inflection, timing, nuances that often don’t come thru in writing. it is very easy to read something one day, come back the next and discover new meaning. a mixture of a very reasonable sentiment You (Americans) are not “in mess”given the right context makes perfect sense. sometimes i imagine what it would be like to have foriegn troop parading the streets here and groups of armed soldiers bursting into my home at night dragging away my son who may end up on his hands and knees naked w/a leash around his neck, which would be a plus if the alternative was death.
in that sense we are not in a mess at all. but i know exactly what its like to misinterpret something or make light of someone elses pain or jump to conclusions, get all huffy, make an ass out of myself,scrap egg off my face, all of these things.
we’ve simply shared to much together to have people jump ship over seemingly insignificant differences, and when you compare all the thoughts and sentiments we have in common, really, nothing said here merits anyone leaving the bar for good. in fact, the very topics we discuss that create the friction would make for a very good thread on a calmer day. so please don’t anyone rush to judgement.
that said, we are in a bit of a mess, in the same way when one sees the sea receed before a tsunami, you may have heard about it before from your ancestors but never actually witnessed it. there is an inevitabilty, a hush, a quiet, a stillness of sorts. and i wonder, how are we(the good people in the world) ever going to turn this around.we need as much unity as we can muster. so don’t anybody stay away too long.

Posted by: annie | Apr 3 2006 3:22 utc | 23

@Annie:
I think that trying to communicate with the world, as an American, from America, is much too difficult right now. At least for me.
I’m utterly tired of it, and it is not worth the effort.
I wish you luck in the endavor.
Groucho

Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 3 2006 4:34 utc | 24

@ Groucho
Well, FG, we can play these little feel good games forever.
Fine by me, what are the rules?
It’s like the old joke for some fast food restaurant here, can’t remember which, which was about growing up and in relative privation, which began: YOU HAD SHOES!!?
I know the joke, Mounty Python send their regards, but I think you are missing the point here. I agree with you that it makes no sense to sit around and compete about who is fairing the worst out of all countries, e.g. ‘but I had to live in a shoe box and clean the street with a toothbrush, only to come home, get smacked by my dad and being sent to bed, which was a stinky sardine can’. However, I do believe there are two kinds of messes, the ones we are in, and the ones they are in, and they are hardly the same. The mess in Iraq or Afghanistan, at least for the people who have to live through it every day, is not a joking matter. To loose ones job in Australia or the US is certainly no fun either, but stack that up against loosing half your family!
Don’t despair. I’ll send you both the last bullet, FedEx air, my expense.
I am not quite sure how to interpret your offer, but thanx anyway, your generosity is noted. How about some shoes? Got some shoes?
@ annie
You are right, there is no denying, the US is in a mess just as much as Australia and Europe are in a mess, but the proportion of this mess, as real as it is, is dwarfed by the hunger, dispair and death in so many other nations. Here in Australia more and more people grow so obese that the government is considering changing the toilet seat standards SBS News 8th March 06:

TOO BIG FOR OUR LOOS
Australia’s standards association is worried that Australians are getting so fat that toilet seats may have to be made stronger to bear their weight.
Standards Australia is expected to recommend “an increase in the strength of toilet seats to accommodate the increasing size of humans”.
The percentage of Australians who are overweight or obese has jumped from 10 percent in the past decade to 62 percent of men and 45 percent of women.
Toilet seats are currently required to meet a rigidity test of 45 kilograms or 99 pounds, which supports most people’s weight in a seated position.
A heavyweight committee, including manufacturers and consumers, will assess whether that standard was still adequate.

What a mess, too fat for our toilet seats. Damned. I guess what I am trying to say is that the magnitude and nature of the problems we “rich nations” face are somewhat different to the ones the poorer countries are struggling with, and this degree of separation is something we should not loose sight of.

Posted by: Feelgood | Apr 3 2006 5:21 utc | 25

this is just a watering hole of refuge groucho/, where we can voice our thoughts w/like minded. i can wonder how, or if we can ever turn the tide without having an illusion of communicating to the world. but we need a place for our voices, and we especially need the voices of the greatest minds. i do anyway. i’m scared. not in the way an iraqi is scared. the threat is not at my door. some day we may be cut off. being here on moon is not an effort, it is a haven. our cave in the mountain. reminding me i am not alone. i am very lucky. we all are in that sense.
today, it may not be worth your effort. but no man is an island. on a day, just like today, it may not seem like an effort. i step out into the world, where my neighbors don’t even follow the news. they have these precious years, days where they can remain unaware, can you do that? just go to the park and play? will we all go down without wimper.
a painter paints. a singer sings. a lover loves. a writer writes. and a thinker thinks.(and i make pots). if everytime you opened your mouth the world heard you, now that would be a responsibility. but here we are relatively safe.so when it seems effortless and not tiring this is a home you can express yourself. and even get in a hissyfit.
but it’s important to not close and bar the door, forever.
much too difficult right now
i hear you, really. and winter is coming on.
i want to go on hearing our familiar voices. that is my endeavor.

Posted by: annie | Apr 3 2006 5:39 utc | 26

i am going to join in here and ask something i have wondered about for years. there may not be an answer. and i will phrase it in particulars, which as i say write this i realize may actually be the reason why there may be no real answer. so the question – is there a real difference in the pain felt even when the living conditions are different? i learned today that a family of friends just lost its 80 something year old patriarch. he may have been old but they did not think he would ever die and they are reeling in pain. r’giap just lost his mother who he hadn’t seen in 10 years and was not able to say goodbye in person. is this pain different in quality from the pain experienced by a family losing a father or a son in iraq? my bf has a hereditary kidney disease that is killing him. it knocks the wind out of me to think of how it will be when we lose him – his children, his friends, and i. he is also in pain on a daily basis. another close friend has deteriorating vertebrae and is in excruciating pain every moment of the day. he doesn’t expect to be able to walk within a year. is there a metric by which we can or should compare the degree of pain? does it make a difference whether the pain is experienced in an affluent society as opposed to a developing country? my gut tells me that for this kind of intimate pain that we all experience at different times in our lives there is no real metric. but when you look at societies or countries or continents of people and see a populace suffering then perhaps it makes sense to measure and make comparisons. but here, where we speak to one another as individuals, perhaps we need to bear in mind how personal pain is. it is likely that the broad brush approach to the circumstances which lead vbo to leave his/her homeland are more horrific than those that lead monocyclus to leave the us, but to each of them as individuals, as persons, at times it must be unbearably and overwhelmingly difficult, frightening, depressing.
vbo, monocyclus, groucho, and debs, please do not leave. if we can’t sustain a dialogue here, is there any hope for the future? there are forces so much more evil. to steal a phrase – we, each one of us, needs every bit of force et tendresse we can muster here. it is afterall up to each of us alone to keep going each day and whatever sustenance a community offers is invaluable. this community of like souls is a treasure.

Posted by: conchita | Apr 3 2006 6:11 utc | 27

Lots of nations once held the position of the USA in the world: the dominant nation militarily, economically and culturally. England was influential far beyond its size & population in the XIX century, France dominated the world in the XVIII, Spain in the XVI, etc. Even Germany had a brie but intense phase where they were the dominant force in Europe
And what happened to all of them? We know already. And all because they seemed to think that they were God’s Chosen Nation and could do no wrong.
America achieved its dominance through a number of factors: its wealth of resources, its mixture of people from all parts of the globe, its spirit of freedom and enterprise and the fact that Europe spent a good part of the last century self-destructing on a mass scale.
I fear that 9/11 marked a massive turning point: we are starting to abandon the ideals that made us great in order to secure our position of power. I don’t think we have started the decline yet, but I fear we have peaked.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Apr 3 2006 6:31 utc | 28

ralphieboy, sadly, i think you are much too optimistic. on friday, the senate judiciary committee held a hearing on russ feingold’s censure resolution. do you know how many democratic senators showed up? leahy. not even the fucking democratic members of the judiciary committee were there to support him. and what of their oath of allegiance to the constitution and their oversight responsibilities. this administration has hijacked and is raping this country – where are our elected leaders?? i would like to agree with you, but no, i believe the decline has begun. it is just a matter of if it will be a freefall. and here in new york it is 2:43 am and i have an 8 am class, no easy feat for my 40+ years.

Posted by: conchita | Apr 3 2006 6:45 utc | 29

‘No Man is an Island’
No man is an island entire of itself; every man
is a piece of the continent, a part of the main;
if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe
is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as
well as any manner of thy friends or of thine
own were; any man’s death diminishes me,
because I am involved in mankind.
And therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.
Olde English Version
No man is an Iland, intire of itselfe; every man
is a peece of the Continent, a part of the maine;
if a Clod bee washed away by the Sea, Europe
is the lesse, as well as if a Promontorie were, as
well as if a Manor of thy friends or of thine
owne were; any mans death diminishes me,
because I am involved in Mankinde;
And therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; It tolls for thee.
MEDITATION XVII
Devotions upon Emergent Occasions
John Donne

Posted by: Argh | Apr 3 2006 8:42 utc | 30

conchita,
censure is a fine thought, and I agree that Bush has committed enough high crimes and misdemeanors to warrant impeachment, but I think the Democrats are just being realistic: given the current political climate, things would quickly degenrate into a political circus and further distract us from the problems at hand.
In any case, I remain an optimist about America, after all, it took Rome centuries from defeat in the Teutoberg Forest (Rome’s 9/11) until the Barbarians reached the gates…

Posted by: ralphieboy | Apr 3 2006 10:29 utc | 31

ralphieboy, i disagree strongly and do want to respond to you on this and will, but at the moment must focus on midterms at school. it is hard enough to get through when you are just 20, never mind late 40s. i’ll be back after it is all over on wednesday.

Posted by: conchita | Apr 3 2006 14:24 utc | 32

things would quickly degenrate into a political circus and further distract us from the problems at hand
just WTF are they doing about the problems at hand? being a little hesitant before they bring the rubber stamp down?
optimist has to be the understatement of the millenia.

Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 3 2006 14:41 utc | 33

conchita,
aboout Bush or about Hermann the German? I beleive that Bush should be censured – by voters in the upcoming elections – by having his majority in the house vouted out from under him.
Anything else would degenerate into a political free-for-all.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Apr 3 2006 15:46 utc | 34

I had visions of an angry free-for-all and nobody to blame for bringing down the discussion but myself. Sometimes, I don’t give you guys enough credit.
well, that statement turned out to be a bit to early…

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Apr 3 2006 16:00 utc | 35