|
Hindsight
Prewar:
The memo indicates the two leaders envisioned a quick victory and a transition to a new Iraqi government that would be complicated, but manageable. Mr. Bush predicted that it was "unlikely there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups." Mr. Blair agreed with that assessment. Bush Was Set on Path to War, British Memo Says, NYT, March 27, 2006
Postwar:
Today, some Americans ask whether removing Saddam caused the divisions and instability we’re now seeing. In fact, much of the animosity and violence we now see is the legacy of Saddam Hussein. …
The argument that Iraq was stable under Saddam and that stability is now in danger because we removed him is wrong. President Discusses Democracy in Iraq with Freedom House, March 29, 2006
via Froomkin
Update:
But I would ask people to, to look at the perspective here of what is really going on in Iraq. Under this, the violence—under the specter of this violence, you have Iraqis now—Sunnis, Shia, Kurds and others—determined to form a government of national unity. That’s extraordinary in Iraq’s history where they’ve always settled their differences by violence, not by politics. Rice on Meet The Press, March 26, 2006
@ Groucho
Well, FG, we can play these little feel good games forever.
Fine by me, what are the rules?
It’s like the old joke for some fast food restaurant here, can’t remember which, which was about growing up and in relative privation, which began: YOU HAD SHOES!!?
I know the joke, Mounty Python send their regards, but I think you are missing the point here. I agree with you that it makes no sense to sit around and compete about who is fairing the worst out of all countries, e.g. ‘but I had to live in a shoe box and clean the street with a toothbrush, only to come home, get smacked by my dad and being sent to bed, which was a stinky sardine can’. However, I do believe there are two kinds of messes, the ones we are in, and the ones they are in, and they are hardly the same. The mess in Iraq or Afghanistan, at least for the people who have to live through it every day, is not a joking matter. To loose ones job in Australia or the US is certainly no fun either, but stack that up against loosing half your family!
Don’t despair. I’ll send you both the last bullet, FedEx air, my expense.
I am not quite sure how to interpret your offer, but thanx anyway, your generosity is noted. How about some shoes? Got some shoes?
@ annie
You are right, there is no denying, the US is in a mess just as much as Australia and Europe are in a mess, but the proportion of this mess, as real as it is, is dwarfed by the hunger, dispair and death in so many other nations. Here in Australia more and more people grow so obese that the government is considering changing the toilet seat standards SBS News 8th March 06:
TOO BIG FOR OUR LOOS
Australia’s standards association is worried that Australians are getting so fat that toilet seats may have to be made stronger to bear their weight.
Standards Australia is expected to recommend “an increase in the strength of toilet seats to accommodate the increasing size of humans”.
The percentage of Australians who are overweight or obese has jumped from 10 percent in the past decade to 62 percent of men and 45 percent of women.
Toilet seats are currently required to meet a rigidity test of 45 kilograms or 99 pounds, which supports most people’s weight in a seated position.
A heavyweight committee, including manufacturers and consumers, will assess whether that standard was still adequate.
What a mess, too fat for our toilet seats. Damned. I guess what I am trying to say is that the magnitude and nature of the problems we “rich nations” face are somewhat different to the ones the poorer countries are struggling with, and this degree of separation is something we should not loose sight of.
Posted by: Feelgood | Apr 3 2006 5:21 utc | 25
|