Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 15, 2006
OT 06-15

Other news & views …

Comments

Lincoln Group:
Quick Rise for Purveyors of Propaganda in Iraq

Two years ago, Christian Bailey and Paige Craig were living in a half-renovated Washington group house, with a string of failed startup companies behind them.

Now their company, Lincoln Group, works out of elegant offices along Pennsylvania Avenue and sponsors polo matches in Virginia horse country. Mr. Bailey recently bought a million-dollar Georgetown row house. Mr. Craig drives a Jaguar and shows up for interviews accompanied by his “director of security,” a beefy bodyguard.
The company’s rise, though, has been built in part by exaggerated claims about its abilities and connections, according to interviews with more than a dozen current and former Lincoln Group employees and associates, and a review of company documents.

Posted by: b | Feb 15 2006 7:16 utc | 1

325,000 Names on Terrorism List

The National Counterterrorism Center maintains a central repository of 325,000 names of international terrorism suspects or people who allegedly aid them, a number that has more than quadrupled since the fall of 2003, according to counterterrorism officials.

An NCTC official refused to say how many on the list — put together from reports supplied by the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency (NSA) and other agencies — are U.S. citizens.
The NSA is a key provider of information for the NCTC database, although officials refused to say how many names on the list are linked to the agency’s controversial domestic eavesdropping effort. Under the program, the NSA has conducted wiretaps on an unknown number of U.S. citizens without warrants.

Posted by: b | Feb 15 2006 7:43 utc | 2

New Abu Ghraib pictures

Posted by: b | Feb 15 2006 8:03 utc | 3

In case you missed it w/ all the Cheney drama
C-span :House Hearing on National Security Whistleblowers

House Subcmte. hearing on “National Security Whistleblowers in the post-9/11 Era: Lost in a Labyrinth and Facing Retaliation by Security Clearance Revocation”

National security whistle-blowers allege retaliation
WASHINGTON (SH) – Military and intelligence officers told spellbound lawmakers Tuesday that their careers had been ruined by superiors because they refused to lie about Able Danger, Abu Ghraib and other national security controversies.
Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, wearing a crisp olive Army uniform with the Bronze Star and other awards, delivered his first public testimony about his central role in Able Danger, a Pentagon computer data-mining program set up long before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to infiltrate the al-Qaeda terrorist network.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 15 2006 8:21 utc | 4

As far as the recent Abu Ghraib pictures, and as godawful, dehumanizing, as the new pics are; Most of them are obviously from the same set that was originally released. They are thought to be among those viewed in private by U.S. senators following a May, 2004 hearing and “withheld from the public to protect the integrity of military trials and what not, however, -at least to me- they are not any worse than the previously released pictures. I suspect and question the timing; were they released at this time for distraction reasons? Not to make light of this sick event.
The Pentagon’s War on the Internet
The Pentagon has developed a comprehensive strategy for taking over the internet and controlling the free flow of information. The plan appears in a recently declassified document, “The Information Operations Roadmap”, which was provided under the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) and revealed in an article by the BBC.
The Pentagon sees the internet in terms of a military adversary that poses a vital threat to its stated mission of global domination. This explains the confrontational language in the document which speaks of “fighting the net”; implying that the internet is the equivalent of “an enemy weapons system.”

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 15 2006 8:37 utc | 5

This broke me tonight…
No bravery. He has been here.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 15 2006 9:15 utc | 6

@Uncle$cam
SBS (Oz) has just run a documentary segment with the new Abu Ghraib pictures and an interview with an ACLU lawyer. Same disgusting stuff – only thing that’s new is perhaps more evidence that this stuff was systemic – and evidence of more deaths.
American thugs, English thugs. This stuff will live with Muslims for all time. The American dreams of Empire will not last.

Posted by: DM | Feb 15 2006 10:32 utc | 7

Well well, just as I wrote about here
and in particular here , ABC news is reporting: EXCLUSIVE: The Secret Tapes — Inside Saddam’s Palace

Feb. 15, 2006 — ABC News has obtained 12 hours of tape recordings of Saddam Hussein meeting with top aides during the 1990s, tapes apparently recorded in Baghdad’s version of the Oval Office.
ABC News obtained the tapes from Bill Tierney, a former member of a United Nations inspection team who translated the tapes for the FBI. Tierney said the U.S. government is wrong to keep these tapes and others secret from the public. “Because of my experience being in the inspections and being in the military, I knew the significance of these tapes when I heard them,” says Tierney. U.S. officials have confirmed the tapes are authentic, and that they are among hundreds of hours of tapes Saddam recorded in his palace office. ..

That Brian Ross and Rhonda Schwartz are some damn fine investigative journalists…lol geez.
Or could it be, Allah on the Holodeck?
I suspect It very well could be the result of voice “morphing” technology developed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico
When Seeing and Hearing Isn’t Believing
However, the sad ironic thing is, once a people lose trust in their government it can never be fully regained. Even if these tapes are the real mccoy , who trusts these guys with anything. Therein lies the problem, (punn intended). Just as Thomas Barnett writes in Donald Rumsfeld: Old Man in a Hurry, “wholesale reform” and ideological “Defense transformation” is their agenda across the board. And as Barnett writes of one of Rumsfeld’s senior aides, Pete Geren, “When your ‘crisis response’ lasts several thousand days, it stops being a crisis and starts being a feature of your strategic landscape.” Clearly, these guys believe themslves to be true political revolutionaries. Permanent Revolution, Trotskyism, noble lies and all that.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 16 2006 0:14 utc | 8

About those Permanent bases in Iraq …
TomDispatch has this to say, and a great deal more:

In a country in such startling disarray, these bases, with some of the most expensive and advanced communications systems on the planet, are like vast spaceships that have landed from another solar system.

Ricks reports that the 20,000 troops stationed at Balad live in “air-conditioned containers” which will, in the future — and yes, for those building these bases, there still is a future — be wired “to bring the troops Internet, cable television and overseas telephone access.” He points out as well that, of the troops at Balad, “only several hundred have jobs that take them off base. Most Americans posted here never interact with an Iraqi.”

There are at least four such “super-bases” in Iraq, none of which have anything to do with “withdrawal” from that country. Quite the contrary, these bases are being constructed as little American islands of eternal order in an anarchic sea. Whatever top administration officials and military commanders say — and they always deny that we seek “permanent” bases in Iraq -– facts-on-the-ground speak with another voice entirely. These bases practically scream “permanency.”

[the sixth base is the] U.S. embassy. It is to arise in Baghdad’s Green Zone on a plot of land along the Tigris River that is reportedly two-thirds the area of the National Mall in Washington, DC. The plans for this “embassy” are almost mythic in nature. A high-tech complex, it is to have “15ft blast walls and ground-to-air missiles” for protection as well as bunkers to guard against air attacks.

It is being billed as “more secure than the Pentagon” (not, perhaps, the most reassuring tagline in the post-9/11 world). If not quite a city-state, on completion it will resemble an embassy-state.

So now we know … there are no plans to build permanent bases in Iraq, and as the Iraqi Army stands up (“40,000 man, lightly armed military without significant armor or an air force”) we will stand down. Or not.
At least the soldiers can get some air-conditioning, pizza and miniature golf, not to mention Hertz rent-a-cars. All they need now is a beach.

Posted by: jonku | Feb 16 2006 0:48 utc | 9

@Jonku I think we can be confident that some ‘contributor’ has taken the leader of the Pentagon beach aquisitions team out for a round of golf or two by now.
The contractor will be explaining exactly why any old desert sand just will not do and that is why $15-$50 mill has been allocated in the contingency fund to import the sand from Hawaii, but that the contractor is pleased to see that our man in the Pentagon has such an interest in sand because there has been a bit of talk in the boardroom about the neccessity of having someone skilled in the geology of beaches as well as military aquisition procedures at an executive level in their organisation and he (our man in the pentagon) sounds like just the person for the job.
As for permanent bases the saying “If wishes were horses all men would ride” comes to mind. I seem to remember similar grand edifices being constructed in certain locations nor more than a spit away from Ho Chi Minh city.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Feb 16 2006 1:26 utc | 10

I’m currently forcing myself to study the latest horror slide show from Iraq’s Abu Ghraib theme park.
It doesn’t feel like I’m invading the victims privacy, but that by as many people as possible seeing these horrors the more people would understand the true face of imperialism.
The one that has nobody in it just a selection of bloodstains of various ages and sprays is the scariest. It speaks of the pain of all who ‘leaked’ on that spot.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Feb 16 2006 1:39 utc | 11

Australian police seize artwork from gallery
In an unprecedented attack on democratic rights and freedom of artistic expression, police in the Australian state of Victoria illegally, and without any prior warning, removed an artwork displaying a burnt and tattered Australian flag from a Melbourne gallery last month.
Created by Azlan McLennan and titled Proudly unAustralian, the flag was on a billboard on the first floor outside the Trocadero Art Space gallery. It is the fourth time in the past two years that McLennan’s work, which expresses political opposition to the “war on terror”, the oppression of Palestinians and the growing racial attacks on Muslims and Middle Eastern immigrants, has been censored by authorities.
Police did not inform either McLennan or Trocadero’s owners that they planned to seize Proudly unAustralian. Instead, they waited until the gallery was unattended and then entered a neighboring Internet café and climbed through a window to remove the artwork. A police business card was left behind to inform the artist.

There’s more and it gets worse. What will we do when the whole world turns fascist at once?

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 16 2006 2:16 utc | 13

From Denmark’s paper of record correspondent:
Capture the Flag
THERE seems to be some surprise that the Danish people and their government are standing behind the Jyllands-Posten newspaper and its decision to publish drawings of the Prophet Muhammad last fall. Aren’t Danes supposed to be unusually tolerant and respectful of others?
Not entirely. Denmark’s reputation as a nation with a long tradition of tolerance toward others — one solidified by its rescue of Danish Jews from deportation to Nazi concentration camps in 1943 and by the high levels of humanitarian aid it provides today — is something of a myth.
What foreigners have failed to recognize is that we Danes have grown increasingly xenophobic over the years. To my mind, the publication of the cartoons had little to do with generating a debate about self-censorship and freedom of expression. It can be seen only in the context of a climate of pervasive hostility toward anything Muslim in Denmark.
There are more than 200,000 Muslims in Denmark, a country with a population of 5.4 million. A few decades ago, Denmark had no Muslims at all. Not surprisingly, Islam has come to be viewed by many as a threat to the survival of Danish culture.
For 20 years, Muslims in Denmark have been denied a permit to build mosques in Copenhagen. What’s more, there are no Muslim cemeteries in Denmark, which means that the bodies of Muslims who die here have to be flown back to their home countries for proper burial…
This is not the only example of Denmark’s new magical thinking. After the flag burnings, the Danish news media began to refer to the white cross on the flag’s red background as a Christian symbol.
There was something discordant about this, for we’ve come to connect the flag less and less to religion. Denmark, after all, is one of the most secular countries in Europe. Only 3 percent of Danes attend church once a week.
Still, the news media were right. Up to a point. Legend has it that the flag fell from heaven during a battle between the Danes and the Estonians nearly 800 years ago. It was a sign from God, and it led the Danes to victory. Now that flag has become a symbol around the world of Denmark’s contempt for another world religion.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 16 2006 2:35 utc | 14

@above:
Whoops, the liberal paper (Information), not the paper of record (Politiken).
Denmark, the new Nazis
First they knocked off Palme and turned Sweden into a neoliberal experiment, now they’re gonna turn Denmark into a new Reich.
There’s more:


According to the cultural editor of the newspaper, Flemming Rose, it was aimed at “testing the limits of self-censorship in Danish public opinion” when it comes to Islam and Muslims. He added: “In a secular society, Muslims have to live with the fact of being ridiculed, scoffed at and made to look ridiculous.”
When the anticipated reaction by the Muslim community failed to arise, the newspaper continued its campaign, determined to create a full-scale scandal. After a week had gone by without protest, journalists turned on Danish Islamic religious leaders who were well known for their fundamentalist views and demanded: “Why don’t you protest?” Eventually, the latter reacted and alerted their co-thinkers in the Middle East.

Official politics and the media throughout Europe are increasingly preoccupied with such agitation. Muslims are collectively held responsible for acts carried out by terrorist groups, although they bear no responsibility for them. In the German state of Baden-Württemberg, Muslims seeking to stay in the country must answer a catalog of questions probing their religious beliefs.
Television news presenters regularly malign Muslims for being prepared to protest against the defamation of Muhammad, but not against acts carried out by terrorist groups in the name of Islam, suggesting that they secretly support such acts.
A campaign is emerging to depict Islam as an inferior culture that is incompatible with “Western values.” There are clear parallels here to the anti-Semitic caricatures that were spread in the 1930s by fascist newspapers such as the Nazi Stürmer. The depiction of Jews as sub-humans served as the ideological preparation for the Holocaust.
Today the systematic defamation of Muslims is being used to prepare public opinion for new wars against countries such as Iran and Syria—wars which will be even more brutal than the Iraq war, and could well involve the use of nuclear weapons.
It is no coincidence that it was the Jyllands-Posten that took up this initiative. The newspaper is notorious for its declarations of support for the Nazis in the 1930s, and has played a key role in Denmark’s recent shift to the right.
With editorial offices in the rural area of Arhus, Jyllands-Posten remained a relatively insignificant provincial newspaper until the beginning of the 1980s. (Note: I was in Aarhus back in the 80’s, when the paper was a local rag.) At that time it began an aggressive policy of expansion. It bought up smaller regional and local newspapers and launched a price war with the two established newspapers in the Danish capital—Berlingske Tidende and Politiken—and rapidly built up its circulation to 170,000, becoming the biggest circulation newspaper in the country. (Amazing!)
In the 1990s the decidedly conservative paper increasingly developed into a mouthpiece for openly xenophobic, right-wing forces. Nearly a quarter of the editorial board was dismissed, and the quality of the paper sank as its aggressiveness rose.
Shortly before the publication of the Muhammad cartoons, Jyllands-Posten ran a headline reading, “Islam is the Most Belligerent.” The newspaper ran an exposé about an alleged Muslim death-list of Jewish names—until it emerged that the whole thing was a fabrication.
One year ago the editor-in-chief resigned because the newspaper carried a report, in the midst of an election campaign, alleging the systematic abuse of welfare rights by asylum-seekers. The sensational charges were published against his will.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 16 2006 2:56 utc | 15

morons!

Posted by: DM | Feb 16 2006 3:19 utc | 16

None dare call it economic treason.
So, even if we were not at the bottom of a rabbit hole, even if the neonuts don’t bomb the shit out of Iran, what could be done to stop the American economy falling off the cliff?
Buchanan doesn’t offer any remedies. Maybe at this stage of the game there aren’t any. The cosy middle-class American dream might be coming to an end.
See you at the bottom!

Posted by: DM | Feb 16 2006 8:12 utc | 17

@DM If amerika is racing to the bottom it’s not gonna be before that country’s ‘leadership’ kicks the nearest scapegoat in the nuts on the way down.
This ‘story’ here tells us that AIPAC strikes again and wants to starve the Palestinian people to death for having the gall to try and prevent the theft of their nation.
This drop in the ocean of the funding which goes to support the corrupt and decadent colonial occupier that is the state of Israel, is being used to bludgeon the Palestinian people into submission.
If there were any logic behind it other than not getting offside with the zionist lobby during an election year, the move could be described as cruel but pragmatic. But the people who are likely to be most effected by this moronic move are those who voted for the Fatah organisation which lost the election because it succumbed to the bribery, blackmail and murder of the US and Israel in the first place.
Since one of the few legitimate (in the eyes of the colonial occupier and its supporters) powers the Palestinian people have to determine their future is to vote in the occasional P.A. elections, what should Fatah supporters do now?
They voted for Fatah and got kicked in the guts by Israel and a mob of foreigners. Yet the people who sided with Hamas which has never depended upon Israel or the US for support are doing better.
It doesn’t take a foreign service degree in fucking over smaller nations to tell you that the only option the Fatah followers have is to change their allegiance from Fatah to Hamas.
But that is almost irrelevant. In the big picture the US and it’s allies have been lecturing the M.E. along with the rest of the not-developed world on the virtues of voting to resolve issue. The Palestinians had their voted and now that same group of people is punishing them for voting.
The fact that many of the people pushing for this oppression are foreigners who have never set foot in Palestine or Israel yet those foreigners have far more civil rights in those ersatz nations than any Palestinian does, will not go un-noticed.
Even if the US managed to prevent ME countries diverting some of the pittance paid those states for their oil to the soon to be starving Palestinians, they won’t be able to prevent a good proportion of the elites in those nations from privately supporting Hamas and the Palestinian people.
Does anyone think that those of the ME elites that are caring and that do provide aid are going to feel closer to the mores of the USA and Europe after this blackmail?

Posted by: Debs is dead | Feb 16 2006 9:45 utc | 18

Gonzales Withholding Plame Emails
Sources close to the investigation into the leak of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson have revealed this week that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has not turned over emails to the special prosecutor’s office that may incriminate Vice President Dick Cheney, his aides, and other White House officials who allegedly played an active role in unmasking Plame Wilson’s identity to reporters.
Thanks for the craptackular performance democrats…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 16 2006 9:55 utc | 19

Something occured to me today which is so off the wall it is probably correct.
That is the publication of the latest Abu Ghraib pix sure diverted everyone’s attention away from the video of English squaddies jumping up and down on the children of Basra.
The notion has a certain symmetry. One of the major differences in Australian foreign policy between the two biggest political parties is that the Labor party (currently in opposition) follows the US line whereas the Tories (the mis-named Liberal Party) believes in being British.
The SBS of old (which is a govt funded TV and radio outlet) wouldn’t go with either ideology, but who knows what havoc little Johnny Howard has pulled on them by now.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Feb 16 2006 9:58 utc | 20

“Frederick the Great once observed that diplomacy without arms was like music without instruments. We must keep all options open if we are to stand any chance of a diplomatic solution to the Iranian crisis.”

More morons.

Frederick the Fucking Great !
The Times newspaper said the party’s defence spokesman Liam Fox told US Republicans in Washington that British Prime Minister Tony Blair should follow President George W. Bush’s example and leave all options on the table.
I’m getting more than a little pissed off with these half-wits. Obviously, the whole fucking system needs to be changed. Don’t know this Liam Fox character, but I’m getting fed up listening to those with shit for brains who think they are our “leaders”.

Posted by: DM | Feb 16 2006 10:43 utc | 21

Damn, Did , I thought everyone knew that this is the standard operating procedure (SOP)(e.g. permanent siege mentality) of these trans-national thugs in their theatre of cruelty…
They, the elite of “the civilized world,” all have one goal, and one goal only, corporate singularity. The Bush Blair Howard project.
And here in the New Merica, we have to face it, the public has ceased to care. The years SINCE Watergate have basically been spent teaching the public how little their vote really matters, and how the government will do whatever the hell it wants no matter what the People have to say about it.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 16 2006 10:55 utc | 22

In case anyone is disposed to counter that Frederick the Great was known as a tactical genius or whatever, this is hardly the point.
My point is that these “leaders” of ours are little more than muddled middlebrow morons. This is not a fucking parlor game. This is not the eighteenth or nineteenth century. This is not the seven year war or the “Great Game” or even some Boys Own Winston Churchill type adventure. This is about a bunch of murderous fanatics who fantasies may very well lead to a nuclear war, the deaths of tens of thousands, and likely the end of the Age of ‘Enlightenment’. I’ve had enough of these people. They have to be gotten rid of.

Posted by: DM | Feb 16 2006 11:02 utc | 23

I ran across the following (some nice word candy) in my travels on the internets tonight, and thought to share…

I want someone to tell me and explain the way it is not what it feels like being eaten by some kind of bug.
I want someone to know and tell why it is not that that these little opportunistic moves are all chewy and digestive and calm collected maneuverings of mandible-like appendages.
I want someone who knows and can tell to tell so I won’t feel like the meal in a festive atmosphere.
I want someone outside the system to say it’s possible to be outside the system because ‘here I am, being there’.
I want someone who can point to the way through this to point to the way through this.
I want the recognition burned into the genes of these canine impostors wearing the uniforms of dead heroes that they are not even fit to be denounced as usurpers they’re more like swineherds clustered around a smoldering fire of ancient rags and wet wood in the rubble and silence of some other empiric dream realized in marble and granite and proportionate grace and fallen as the spirits left for another time’s more welcome labor.
I want it burned into their DNA so indelibly that they’ll kick resonant harmonics into starlight.
I want them shocked and hesitant at the arrogance that places their snivelling treachery in its new context of necessity.
I want them cognizant that what they are is foul, that what they are and are continuing to become is foul, that there are no criminal statutes to contain what they are but there it is, there it is you bastards.
I want at the same time there to be a place I won’t get to because the contamination of them might go there too, but it’s there and someone there is saying thank you.
I want the purification of intense heat, and the relentless drive toward knowledge of my own incomplete and collapsing youthful drunken sprawl on the threshold of numinous acceptance and vomit and aching and afterward the impossible the Xenic steps marked out ahead of time and all is lost but nothing to do but climb and climb and still rolling down Sysyphean.
I want that little mechanism to trip the bomb of rose perfume that spreads its promise across their skies in antidote to the corrupt and chemically obscene stench of patented greed sadism and bondage that rises from their pristine obedient yards and sterile agricultural dirt.
I want to be the last of the shambing incompetents and each one that comes after to rise one on the other toward what we all know is there but have been trained so painfully to pretend can never be.
I want to not be food for this worse-than-arachnoid aggrandizement because the black widow in her peaceful darkness is maternal and full of as much grace and kindness as any of their mothers but they have renounced that and harmed it and damaged it for all time and created a darkness that eats sunlight that goes about in the light of day like a man in a brand-new suit selling vampiric shadows to children.
I want to be like the guy who picks up the guitar and makes all the other musicians feel comfortable because he’s so unapologetically mediocre and insistently there at the accessible bottom of aesthetic purchase and climb.
I want to hear from angels in transit the equivalent of driving all night only on that scale of vast mobility and they’re on their way it’s okay hang on.
Hang on.

I’ll have a scotch while waiting…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 16 2006 11:40 utc | 24

No Love Lost at the Enron Trial
Prosecution witness Ken Rice used to be one of ex-CEO Jeffrey Skilling’s best pals. That wasn’t the case yesterday

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 16 2006 13:43 utc | 25

Thanks Uncle $cam. For some reason I was reminded of this:

The Unknown Soldier
by Luc Sante
The last thing I saw was a hallway ceiling four feet wide, with a plaster molding that looked like a long row of small fish, each trying to swallow the one ahead of it. The last thing I saw was a crack of yellow sky between buildings, partly obscured by a line of laundry. The last thing I saw was the parapet, and beyond it the trees. The last thing I saw was his badge, but I couldn’t tell you the number. The last thing I saw was a full shot glass, slid along by somebody who clapped me on the back. The last thing I saw was the sedan that came barreling straight at me while I thought, It’s okay, I’m safely behind the window of the doughnut shop. The last thing I saw was a boot, right foot, with nails protruding from the instep. The last thing I saw was a turd. The last thing I saw was a cobble. The last thing I saw was night.
I lost my balance crossing Broadway and was trampled by a team of brewery horses. I was winching myself up from the side of a six-story house on a board platform with a load of nails for the cornice when the weak part of the rope hit the pulley sideways and got sheared. I lost my way in snowdrifts half a block from my apartment. I drank a bottle of carbolic acid not really knowing whether I meant to or not. I got very cold and coughed and forgot things. I went out to a yard to try to give birth in secret, but something happened. I met a policeman who mistook me for somebody else. I was drunk on my birthday and fell off the dock trying to grab a gold piece that looked like it was floating. I was hanged in the courtyard of the Tombs before a cheering crowd and people clogged the rooftops of buildings, but I still say that rascal had it coming. I stole a loaf of bread and started eating it as I ran down the street, but there was a wad of raw dough in the middle that got caught in my throat. I was supposed to get up early that morning, but couldn’t move. I heard a sort of whistling noise above my head as I was passing by the post office, and that’s all I know. I was hustling a customer who looked like a real swell, but when we got upstairs he pulled out a razor. I owed a lot of rent and got put out and that night curled up in somebody else’s doorway, and he came home in a bad mood. I ate some oysters I dug up myself. I felt very hot and shaky and strange, and everybody in the shop was looking at me, and I kept trying to tell them that I’d be all right in a minute, but I just couldn’t get it out.
I never woke up as the fumes snaked into my room. I stood yelling as he stabbed me again and again. I shot up the bag as soon as I got home, but thought it smelled funny when I cooked it. I was asleep in the park when these kids came by. I crawled out the window and felt sick looking down, so I just threw myself out and looked up as I fell. I thought I could get warm by burning some newspaper in a soup pot. I went to pieces very slowly and was happy when it finally stopped. I thought the train was going way too fast, but I kept on reading. I let this guy pick me up at the party, and sometime later we went off in his car. I felt real sick, but the nurse thought I was kidding. I jumped over to the other fire escape, but my foot slipped. I thought I had time to cross the street. I thought the floor would support my weight. I thought nobody could touch me. I never knew what hit me.
They put me in a bag. They nailed me up in a box. They walked me down Mulberry Street followed by altar boys and four priests under a canopy and everybody in the neighborhood singing the “Libera Me Domine.” They collected me in pieces all through the park. They laid me in state under the rotunda for three days. They engraved my name on the pediment. They drew my collar up to my chin to hide the hole in my neck. They laughed about me over baked meats and rye whiskey. They didn’t know who I was when they fished me out and still don’t know six months later. They held my body for ransom and collected, but by that time they had burned it. They never found me. They threw me in the cement mixer. They heaped all of us into a trench and stuck a monument on top. They cut me up at the medical school. They weighed down my ankles and tossed me in the drink. They named a dormitory after me. They gave speeches claiming I was some kind of tin saint. They hauled me away in the ashman’s cart. They put me on a boat and took me to an island. They tried to keep my mother from throwing herself in after me. They bought me my first suit and dressed me up in it. They marched to City Hall holding candles and shouting my name. They forgot all about me and took down my picture.
So give my eyes to the eye bank, give my blood to the blood bank. Make my hair into switches, put my teeth into rattles, sell my heart to the junkman. Give my spleen to the mayor. Hook my lungs to an engine. Stretch my guts down the avenue. Stick my head on a pike, plug my spine to the third rail, throw my liver and lights to the winner. Grind my nails up with sage and camphor and sell it under the counter. Set my hands in the window as a reminder. Take my name from me and make it a verb. Think of me when you run out of money. Remember me when you fall on the sidewalk. Mention me when they ask you what happened. I am everywhere under your feet.

Posted by: beq | Feb 16 2006 14:12 utc | 26

p.s. Scotch doesn’t blow my dress up but if it wasn’t mid-morning I’d join you with a sour mash. 😉

Posted by: beq | Feb 16 2006 14:14 utc | 27

@debs:
US cutting off aid to the Palestinians could be a good thing, as it could strip the last veneer off of the hollow “US impartiality” myth.
In any event, the two pie charts accompanying the story are interesting. Half of US aid is USAID $, which is pure bribery money–it will probably be increased. 20M is ‘debt relief’, which the Palestinians probably wouldn’t pay anyway.
The EU spends a measly $35M on hunger relief? When 40% of the population is malnourished? Boy, it’s pretty cheap to play good cop these days. They certainly aren’t trying to prevent hunger with that measly expenditure.
The other story is that the two pie charts represent only EU and US donations, as if that were all the aid they got. To have the Palestinians align themselves with the rest of the world could only be a good thing.
This is another example of the administration being pennywise and poundfoolish to accomplish their objectives (not mine).

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 16 2006 14:21 utc | 28

Mr Putin steps into the fray over the democratic election of Hamas (this is the Chinese take from the People’s Daily Online).
Evidence that Russia is back in business on the global stage – energy superpowers have super powers after all. (Cue for Billmon-inspired cartoon of Putin as Superman, but I haven’t got the software to do it.)
PS Good to see Bill’s back.

Posted by: Dismal Science | Feb 16 2006 18:20 utc | 29

Salon exclusive: The Abu Ghraib files

Based on a verbal description of the files and images, Olshansky said she believes that the material obtained by Salon represents all of the Abu Ghraib images and video the Pentagon has been fighting to keep confidential. “I’m guessing that what you have is a pretty rare and complete set,” she said.

Posted by: beq | Feb 16 2006 19:50 utc | 30

Why should Hamas have to disarm if Israel doesn’t?

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 16 2006 23:01 utc | 31

“The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it, moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard.”
“There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live — did live, from habit that became instinct — in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.”

Posted by: DM | Feb 16 2006 23:51 utc | 33

the headline’s not exactly breaking news, but…
via pr watch : Mainstream Media an Instrument of U.S. Foreign Policy

A sequence of events transpired over the past few days that perfectly illustrate the mainstream media’s role as propagandists for the U.S. and Colombian governments. These events consisted of the media’s coverage of the massacre of six family members in Colombia and the release of a United Nations human rights report. The problem is rooted in the media’s over-reliance on official sources, despite being fully aware of a long history of lying and manipulation by those sources. The corporate media’s insistence on continuing this practice makes evident its willingness to operate as an instrument of U.S. foreign policy by providing disinformation and outright lies to the U.S. public.
On February 12, the European-based Reuters and the Spanish news agency EFE reported that leftist rebels belonging to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) had massacred six members of a family, including an 80-year-old woman. The entire story, as is so often the case in such instances, was based on the statements of a single Colombian government official.
U.S. media outlets, including the Houston Chronicle and ABC News, unquestioningly began publishing the wire service story about the massacre.
…it was later revealed that the FARC were not in fact responsible for the massacre. While it usually takes weeks for the truth to be revealed in such instances, on this occasion a government official came clean two days after the initial reports of the massacre were published. The interior minister of the department of Antioquia, Jorge Mejía, acknowledged that following an initial investigation into the killings, “The method of operation indicates [the perpetrators] to be paramilitaries who have demobilized but have remained in the region.”
Neither Reuters, the Houston Chronicle or ABC News bothered to inform the public that previous claims made in their publications apparently were not true and that evidence instead points to supposedly demobilized right-wing paramilitaries as the perpetrators of the massacre. Only the Spanish news agency EFE published a follow-up story.
The media’s obedient coverage of the massacre in Colombia was further put into perspective one day after the initial news stories were published. On February 13, the United Nations released its annual human rights report in which it stated that there had been an increase in extra-judicial killings by Colombian soldiers and police in 2005. It went on to note that government forces often dressed the corpses as guerrillas and presented them as combat deaths. According to the report, “Cases were recorded in which commanders themselves had allegedly supported the act of dressing the victims in guerrilla garments to cover up facts and simulate combat.”
The UN report is just the latest revelation in a long history of overwhelming evidence showing that the government repeatedly distorts the truth about killings in the country’s civil conflict. One would think that the media’s knowledge of this fact, and its awareness that officials repeatedly issue statements that later prove to be false, would lead journalists and editors to realize that they are simply being used for propaganda purposes.

it’s not journalism, it’s business. and these days business is boomin’.
Bush plans huge propaganda campaign in Iran

The Bush administration made an emergency request to Congress yesterday for a seven-fold increase in funding to mount the biggest ever propaganda campaign against the Tehran government…

how much are they asking for? $75m “in extra funds, on top of $10m already allocated for later this year.”
and on the subject of funding u.s. foreign policy…
NED Grants for FY 2005

In the Name of Democracy researcher Anthony Fenton received this information from a NED program officer in December. According to NED spokesperson Jane Riley Jacobson, it was not intended to be made public (all or portions thereof, in conjunction with the publication of their annual report) until May 2006.
SUMMARY OF PROJECTS APPROVED FY 2005:
LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

Posted by: b real | Feb 17 2006 3:40 utc | 35

From the low volume of noise on this and other boards, I guess that BushCo has once again manipulated the domestic MSM to play down the call from the UN to close Guantanamo immediately and either free the inmates or give them a real trial with real lawyers.
Even the man that amerika loves to have a love/hate relayionship with; UN Secretary General Kofi Annan is backing the key elements of the report.
Even though in Annan’s weak as piss, two bob each way manner, he has said “he did not agree with all the findings” Annan still calls for it to closed down.
The US media has done their public a great disservice by playing down the world wide reaction to the concentration and torture camp.
Although they back the US line that the report was written by people who hadn’t been to Gitmo, they don’t go behind the claim that the interviews with former inmates meant nothing as terrarists would say anything.
Remember when the world was told those few who were released were innocents rolled up in a flawed process? If they were innocent when released, how did they become guilty when they spoke about their experiences.
By the same token with former guards ‘spilling the beans’, surely even Bushco realises that the rest of the world esp those countries like the UK who wish to divert attention from their own misdeeds are going to hop on the ‘Gitmo is the root of all evil’ meme.
I’ve a feeling that despite the hard work put into domestic spinning, Gitmo is going to haunt BushCo and US citizens for many years yet.
Because it has been so well documented and so challenged, Gitmo may well be the base of War Crimes charges in the future.
Amongst all of the evidence that has been so well covered by statements from the Whitehouse and TV filming that it is beyond denial or equivocation, there will certainly be some where BushCo failed to keep all their ducks in a row.
The charges may not come while BushCo is still in charge at WH, or depending on the spine of dems, once the rethugs lose their control in Senate and Congress, but they will come.
Parts of BBC articles linked to above that are worth quoting:

“UN human rights investigators have called for the immediate closure of the US detention camp at Guantanamo Bay.
A UN report on conditions in the Cuba camp says the US should try all inmates or free them “without further delay”.
Some aspects of the treatment of the 500-strong camp population amount to torture, the UN team alleges.”….From here
…..”One of the most disturbing interrogations Sgt Saar says he saw in his six months at the prison concerned a female interrogator trying to break a Saudi detainee, captured after enrolling in a US flight school.
He tells how she began peeling off her clothes, taunting the man sexually in an attempt to shame him and stop him relying on his faith for support.
She left the interrogation room, Sgt Saar says, and found a red marker pen.
“‘Brooke’ came back round his [the prisoner’s] other side, and he could see that she was beginning to withdraw her hand from her pants,” said Sgt Saar.
“As it became visible, the Saudi saw what looked like red blood on her hand.”
When the interrogator wiped what he thought was menstrual blood on his face, the prisoner raged, almost breaking free from his handcuffs.
But “Brooke” taunted him further, said Erik Saar, asking whether Allah would be pleased with him and telling him to have fun trying to pray.
Finally the detainee was returned to his cell without water, leaving him unable to cleanse himself.”….. From Soldier lifts lid on Guantanamo ‘abuse’
…..”The US has dismissed most of the findings of the report which include allegations of torture.
It said most of the allegations were “largely without merit” as the five investigators never actually visited Guantanamo Bay.
The investigators say they rejected an offer to go to Guantanamo, as they would not have been allowed to meet the prisoners.”…. Here
…..”Meanwhile, three British residents held at Guantanamo Bay have won permission to seek a High Court order requiring the UK to petition for their release.
A judge said claims of torture at the camp meant the government might have an obligation to act on their behalf.
But there were “formidable arguments” against Bisher al-Rawi, Jamil el-Banna and Omar Deghayes’s case, he added.
The UK government had contended it could not represent non-British citizens at the camp – thought to number nine.
The judge Mr Justice Collins remarked during the hearing on Thursday that the US’ idea of torture: “Doesn’t appear to coincide with that of most civilised countries.” ….. Here

Posted by: Debs is dead | Feb 17 2006 7:51 utc | 36

GOSSIP … that’s all this is …
K. Annan is America’s man. He was G4 (salary scale) – had a post equivalent to doorman or trilingual secretary, and rose thru the ranks. (Not a bad thing in itself.) Just, someone who is attuned to the whole UN shmear, to compromise, posturing, to knitting together excuses for genocidal crap, appeasing world leaders. Well, that is what that job is all about.
When the US threw out Boutros Boutros Ghali because he would not agree to bombing the shit out of ex-Yugoslavia and painting Milosevic – centrist banker and aspiring industrialist and ex friend of Kissinger and so on – as the green-clawed villain, they looked for a safe, submissive person. One candidate was Gro H. Brutland (ex DG of the WHO). Tongues has it that she was promised the post (UN DG), but for next time, as now it seemed expedient to have Koffee. She would wait out his first term, then, be elected. Didn’t happen, as Koffee proved to be so amenable and popular. She quit in disgust, taking all of the staff that she had brought in, relatives and hangers on, to combat smoking!
Koffee went into a depression when the US invaded Iraq.
Then he almost collapsed when his good friend Sergio (Viera di Mello), died, bombed to bits in Baghdad. A terrorist attack with a white truck, not elucidated to this day.
It was a great shock for much of the UN community. They too could be seen as overlords, western dictators and spongers, false peacenicks, arrogant idiots, liars and scammers, US apologists or flunkeys.
More prosaically, all their jobs were at risk (contributions.)
They all decided to buckle down and keep a low profile.
Now, Bolton is on the rampage.

Posted by: Noisette | Feb 17 2006 21:01 utc | 37

@Noisette If the increasing international opposition to ‘Gitmo” Hell I don’t like that shortening, lets call it what it is: “The US’s most notorious concentration and torture institution, believed to be outside the clutches of the increasingly irrelevant US constitution because it is located on land seized by force from a foreign nation.” (TUMNCATIBT BOTCOTIIUC BIILOLSB FFAFN or TUMNCATI for short)
Anyway if the opposition was just coming from the confused Annan (I find references to him such as Koffee as unfortunate if not downright racist as those who called Powell the “House Nigger” since what a person does is what we need to look at rather than his/her forbears.) we could write it off as pointless murmerings.
But the opposition to these practices; allegedly first instituted at TUMNCATI then spread into Iraq, Afghanistan, Poland, Romania and the rest is widespread.
BushCo ignore this at their peril. The Empire is mortally wounded.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Feb 17 2006 22:21 utc | 38

It’s time to talk about a situation which I’m sure many MoA habitues will have noticed.
We have been too distracted by other issues, some pretty damn incidental, to comment upon Haiti.
The International Observers lacked the courage for such blatant theft, the people have spoken, and Rene Préval is President of Haiti.
Clearly he’s not the people’s first choice that role belongs to Aristide. Preval will allow Aristide to return and it must only be a matter of time before the people do get what they want.
The most important message to draw from this is that the BushCo Imperial failures in the Middle East have, despite Rumsfeld bluster, caused a massive loss of power and influence in the oldest and most established parts of the US Empire. Until Dubya bought hisself in, US control of South and Central America had been absolute for several decades.
The Aristide ouster was a cock-up from beginning to end; especially since Aristide didn’t ‘commit suicide’. The US catchpole, Brazil, signally failed to keep the people and the ballot boxes seperate:

“key political figures were unwilling to make any concessions and acknowledge Préval’s ascendancy. But the genie was out of the bottle. His support base in the poor neighbourhoods of Port-au-Prince refused to let unrepresentative politicians block their best hope for change.
‘We went through hell and high water to get our voter cards. We did it again to cast our vote, and now they want to take it away from us,” said one labourer in the capital.
This conviction grew as various incidents seemed to give credence to the allegations of vote-rigging, and discrepancies on the official web site giving the latest figures, and exceptionally high numbers of blank and spoilt votes fuelled tensions further.
Crowds to the streets but were always peaceful, just as they had been during the long day of voting on February 7. On that day, people confounded predictions of a low turn out and showed tremendous patience and dignity – despite poor organisation and genuine frustrations – to show their determination to seize an opportunity they sense might provide them with a better future.”

Even worse the ballot fixing was a clumsy and futile effort:

“Feelings rose to their greatest frenzy when thousands of apparently genuine but unexamined ballot papers were found on a rubbish dump on the outskirts of the capital. Most of the votes were for Préval and his party. A deliberate attempt to undermine his chances? A set-up? No one knows how they came to be there – the UN mission charged with transporting and storing the ballots has ordered an enquiry, and the top electoral official is no longer to be found. With the credibility of the process in shreds, there could be no question of a second round.
Intense diplomatic negotiations followed. A new formula was found for treating the blank votes that brought Préval’s share up to 51.15%, and except for a few demonstrations of joy, people have returned to their normal activities – street vendors are back on the streets, public transport has resumed.”

Although in typical BushCo Rovian fashion an excuse has been tucked away for a rainy day. I don’t believe it’s execution would be any more successful than any of the other cock-ups:

“The controversial nature of his appointment will almost certainly come back to haunt him. The man whose challenge he beat off, Leslie Manigat, has vowed to contest the outcome as illegal. He could well exploit the divisions in parliament, where Préval is unlikely to have a majority, to block decision-making, and there are tough arguments to be held over questions of security, the fate of prisoners facing serious charges but not yet brought to trial, and just how to create jobs and end poverty in a country with so few resources.”

Once again BushCo have been stymied by their inability to understand that whilst all people are the same, cultural differences must be factored in to any attempt to ‘silver tongue’ societies outside the US. This is a field of endeavour where BushCo lack any competence whatsoever.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Feb 17 2006 23:14 utc | 39

And they lack local competence because it takes heart and love to actually come to know others. More and more we are quitting them, they are breaking our hearts every day, and we are quitting them. So this generation of vipers is content not to win but instead to fail and thrash around destructively to profit from failure. And we are quitting them faster now.
Eventually they will fail to win at failing. Because they will have only heartless men and women – each other – to rely on. They will have nothing.

Posted by: citizen | Feb 17 2006 23:39 utc | 40

brian concannon jr on the nyt’s foreign policy agenda re the preval victory

An editorial in this Friday’s New York Times proclaims that this future begins now. The Times declares that the election deal “tarnishes the democratic legitimacy” of Preval’s landslide. It recommends that Preval remove the tarnish by “reaching out to his opponents” (e.g. pursuing policies that the voters rejected), and “reining in his violence-prone supporters.” The editorial did not suggest that Mr. Preval’s opponents, many of whom were key players in the violent overthrow of Haiti’s democracy two years ago which led to thousands of deaths, rein in their supporters. Nor, when it declared that “Haiti will need international support for a long time,” did the Times mention its own groundbreaking report of January 29 that the U.S., among other members of the International Community, intentionally undermined and overthrew Haiti’s elected government in 2004.
Although the Times does not find the context of two weeks or two years ago relevant, it does catalogue Preval’s sins from his first administration, and it is a fair bet that we will hear this list often over the next five years. The police “remained brutal and corrupt” (by any account, the police have become much more brutal and much more corrupt under the IGH); “no progress was made toward creating a competent judiciary” (Preval’s administration saw the two best human rights prosecutions in Haiti’s history in 2000, both lauded by the UN, Amnesty International and, among others, the New York Times; Preval also made the Judges Academy, dismantled by the IGH, operational); “legislative elections were badly flawed;” “drug trafficking flourished;” etc.
Last week’s election was Haiti’s fourth Presidential election since 1990. The previous three- 1990, 1995 and 2000- were all conducted without serious violence. Each time, the voters supported the candidate of the Lavalas political movement at levels unheard of in “mature democracies”-no runner-up ever topped 16% of the vote. But each time a minority in Haiti, with support from the International Community, successfully limited this mandate. President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the victor in the first and third of those elections, suffered two successful coup d’etats, and spent half of his two terms in exile. President Preval managed to spend his whole term in office and pass power to an elected successor (the first Haitian President to do so), but a manufactured political crisis and perpetual squabbling about the extent of the Lavalas landslides prevented the seating of a legislature. More important, the crisis successfully diverted President Preval’s energies and attention away from the economic and social development policies he was elected to implement.
Haiti’s politics are not parlor games. Each coup d’etat leads to thousands of deaths, and many more times that are killed by diseases that would be prevented or treated by the programs of a less embattled government. The life expectancy for men in Haiti has dropped below 50. It is far past time for the International Community to stop condemning Haiti to repeating this outrageously unjust history.

Posted by: b real | Feb 18 2006 5:13 utc | 42

The Long War

Every four years, the Pentagon releases its Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), more accurately the Quadrennial Defense Rubberstamp. Usually, it offers the same, more of the same or less of the same. That is true of this QDR as well, with one interesting exception. Perhaps uniquely in the annals of strategic planning, this QDR promises strategic failure a priori. It puts that promise right up front, in its first sentence, which reads, �The United States is a nation engaged in what will be a long war.�
Long wars are usually strategic disasters for winners as well as losers, because they leave all parties exhausted. If they work to anyone�s advantage, it tends to be the weaker party�s, because its alternative is rapid defeat. The Rumsfeld Pentagon certainly does not see the United States as the weaker party in its �Global War on Terrorism.� So why has it adopted a long war strategy, or more accurately lack of strategy, unless one sees national exhaustion as a plus?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 18 2006 6:56 utc | 43

interesting article by douglas valentine on a cia deep cover agent’s recounting of the cia-led raid on iraq’s osirak reactor in 1981 – The Raid On Iraq.

Posted by: b real | Feb 18 2006 18:32 utc | 44

A Half-Dozen Questions About 9/11 They Don’t Want You to Ask
Read it.
Then get up and change your underwear.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 18 2006 23:15 utc | 45

I guess this is what they mean “democracy with a small ‘d'”
U.S. asks Palestinians to return $50 million in aid

Posted by: tgs | Feb 19 2006 0:12 utc | 46

panopticon watch update
Chicago’s Panopticon

As I write this here in Chicago, most stores, restaurants, and other places of business have surveillance cameras. The city offers every business three options.
Option 1: Hook up a camera and have it connected to the Police Department, so every time a customer walks in, the Police can see what they are doing. In what is probably the World’s largest reality TV program, right now Mayor Daley and members of the Chicago Police Department come to command headquarters and watch on the monitors as thousands maybe more Chicagoans shop while under surveillance.
Option 2: If a business doesn’t want to participate in hooking a camera up to police headquarters they can hook the camera up to the back of the store. The store’s security people watch a tape of everyone who comes in and if a crime is committed the tape is forwarded to the Police
Option 3: If for Civil Liberties reasons or because they feel it creates an impersonal atmosphere a business owner doesn’t want to hook up a surveillance camera, they can choose not to since it’s there property.
So while every store near my home in Chicago has surveillance cameras, some places in other parts of the city chose not to and some of the cameras don’t go directly to Police headquarters. The Chicago Police Department also has set up hidden cameras throughout the city, so citizens walking on sidewalks or driving at intersections can be routinely watched. So we are a pretty well protected city.
Despite that fact, an aldermen proposed and Mayor Daley has voiced his strong support of a new law mandating that every business in the city install a camera and hook it up to command headquarters. If any business would prefer not to have a camera or have a camera that goes to the back of the store instead,if this law passes they could have their business shut down by the city for failure to comply.

and you probably heard about chief po-po in houston, tx
HPD may add video cameras to its ranks

Facing a shortage of police officers, Police Chief Harold Hurtt called Wednesday for a new type of patrol: surveillance cameras on downtown streets, apartment complexes and shopping malls — and in extreme situations, private homes.
“If you’re not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?” Hurtt told reporters.

Posted by: b real | Feb 19 2006 3:12 utc | 47

somebody needs to keep don rumsfeld away from the horse. that’s only supposed to be for the recruits…

Posted by: b real | Feb 19 2006 3:25 utc | 48

big brother is coming. Who is watching all this video with the latest budget cuts. can I have a job? What’s it gonna protect, nothing. good reason for us to leave the cities and move back to small towns.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 19 2006 5:33 utc | 50

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 03:34:02 +0000, Österreichische Lotterien
wrote:
> Österreichische Lotterien
> Central Office Management and Central Services: Rennweg 44
>
> AT – 1038 Wien,Austria.
>
> Reference Number: ÖL/05-AT/2673
> Batch: ÖL/05/6565
>
> Congratulations!!!
>
> We are pleased to inform you of the result of the just concluded annual
> final draws of Österreichische Lotterien Program. Österreichische
> Lotterien draws was conducted from an exclusive list of 25,000,000 e-mail
> addresses of individual and corporate bodies picked by an advanced
> automated random computer ballot search from the internet as part of our
> international promotions program which we conduct every year.No tickets
> were sold.
>
> After this automated computer ballot, your e-mail address attached to
> serial number 25-6565 drew the lucky numbers 6-13-18-24-33-39 which
> consequently emerged you as one of first fifty (50) lucky winners in this
> category.
> You have therefore been approved for a lump sum payout of €1,000,000.00
> (One Million EURO) in cash credited to file ÖL/05-AT/2673. This is from a
> total cash prize of €50 Million Euro shared amongst the first fifty (50)
> lucky winners in this category.
> This year Lottery Program Jackpot is the largest ever for Österreichische
> Lotterien. The estimated €50 million jackpot would be the sixth-biggest
> in Europe history. The biggest was the €363 million jackpot that went to
> two winners in a Febuary 2000 drawing of The Big Game Mega Millions’
> predecessor.
> Your fund is now deposited in an offshore bank with a hardcover
> insurance. Due to the mix up of some numbers and names, we advice that
> you keep this award from public notice until your claim has been
> processed and your money remitted to your nominated bank account as this
> is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or unwarranted
> taking advantage of this program by the general public.
> Please note that your lucky winning number falls within our European
> booklet representative office in London. In view of this, your
> €1,000,000.00 (One Million Euro) would be released to you by our
> affiliate bank in Europe. Our agent will immediately commence the process
> to facilitate the release of your funds to you as soon as you make
> contact with him.
> To begin your claim please contact our licensed and accredited agent
> assigned to you:
> Mr.Stevens.G. Herbert
> Österreichische Lotterien
> Information and Payment Bureau:
> London Representative Office.
> Phone: +44-702-305-8359 Fax: +44-870-068-8245
> E-mail: ost_stevens01@uk2.net
>
> Your claims agent will assist you in the processing and remittance of
> your prize funds into your designated bank account.
> Note that all prize funds must be claimed not later than One month. After
> this date all funds will be returned to the LOTTERY TREASURY as
> unclaimed. In order to avoid unnecessary delays and complications, please
> endeavor to quote your Reference Number:ÖL/05-AT/2673 and Batch
> numbers:ÖL/05/6565 in every correspondence with your agent. Furthermore,
> should there be any change in your address, do inform your claims agent
> as soon as possible.
>
> Members of the affiliate agencies are automatically not allowed to
> participate in this program.
> Congratulations once again from all members of our staff and thanks for
> being part of our promotions program.
> Yours faithfully,
> Mrs.Susanne Lu
> Promotions Manager.
> Österreichische Lotterien.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 19 2006 5:35 utc | 51

The Washington Posts resident cynic, Dana Milbank, has a good OpEd piece on the Democrats:
Precriminations

The latest Washington Post-ABC News poll found that, approaching the midterm elections, Democrats enjoy their biggest advantage over Republicans in 14 years. Issue after issue — Hurricane Katrina, Iraq, Jack Abramoff and now Harry Whittington — gives the opposition party a potential advantage. And then there’s the historical advantage enjoyed by the opposition in the elections midway through an incumbent president’s second term. To some, this might be cause for celebration. But not to Democrats. Beaten in the last three election cycles, the party has a serious insecurity complex. Convinced they will face another disappointment in November, Democrats are already busy figuring out who among them should be blamed for the inevitable defeat. Here’s a guide for handicapping the Democratic precriminations.

It’s Hillary’s fault.

It’s Bill’s fault.

Posted by: b | Feb 19 2006 8:56 utc | 52

…Much of the Iraq fiasco can be directly attributed to Bush’s shortcomings as a leader. Having decided to invade Iraq, he failed to make sure there was adequate planning for the postwar period. He never settled bitter policy disputes among his principal aides over how postwar Iraq would be governed; and he allowed competing elements of his administration to pursue diametrically opposed policies at nearly the same time. He used jobs in the Coalition Provisional Authority to reward political loyalists who lacked professional competence, regional expertise, language skills, and, in some cases, common sense. Most serious of all, he conducted his Iraq policy with an arrogance not matched by political will or military power.
These shortcomings have led directly to the current dilemmas of the US both in Iraq and with Iran. Unless the President and his team—abetted by some oversight from Congress— are capable of examining the causes of failure in Iraq, it is hard to believe he will be able to manage the far more serious problem with Iran.

The Mess by Peter Galbraith

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 19 2006 11:08 utc | 53

Higher in the thread, others question the lack of attention to the UN report and Guantanamo. Inexplicable.
At Slate, Dahlia Lithwick asks the same question and reviews the findings of the UN report, as well as two others on the facility, all released in the last 2 weeks. The reports unmask the menadacity of all govt claims for continuing to maintain the facility and hold the prisoners. Why, again, is media coverage so slight?

Most detainees are being held for the crime of having “associated” with the Taliban or al-Qaida—often in the most attenuated way, including having known or lived with people assumed to be Taliban, or worked for charities with some ties to al-Qaida. Some had “combat” experience that seems to have consisted solely of being hit by U.S. bombs. Most were not picked up by U.S. forces but handed over to our military by Afghan warlords in exchange for enormous bounties and political payback.
But weren’t they all proved guilty of something at their status review hearings? Calling these proceedings “hearings” does violence to that word. Detainees are assumed guilty until proven innocent, provided no lawyers, and never told what the evidence against them consists of. That evidence, according to another report by Hegland, often consists of little beyond admissions or accusations by other detainees that follow hundreds of hours of interrogations. (A single prisoner at Guantanamo, following repeated interrogation, accused over 60 of his fellow inmates—or more than 10 percent of the prison’s population. Some of his accounts are factual impossibilities.) Another detainee “confessed” following an interminable interrogation, shouting: “Fine, you got me; I’m a terrorist.” When the government tried to list this as a confession, his own interrogators were forced to break the outrageous game of telephone and explain it as sarcasm. A Yemeni accused of being a Bin Laden bodyguard eventually “admitted” to having seen Bin Laden five times: “Three times on Al Jazeera and twice on Yemeni news.” His file: “Detainee admitted to knowing Osama Bin Laden.”

Clearly the detainees know it’s a cruel, absurd circus.
Lithwick concludes that the only reason that the administration continues to maintain Guantanamo is to avoid having to admit to a mistake. It’t true that they don’t seem to know the word “mistake”. I wish I felt more confidence in her simple explanation.
But Halliburton banked $30mil contract last June for a permanent detention facility to be completed by June 2006, included expanding solitary cells from 50 to 200 and adding a shiny $1.7mil psychiatric wing.
Then there is the new almost-no-torture law. Did I hear correctly yesterday on Democracy Now? Is there a provision in the bill that says,”For the purposes of this bill, Guantanamo is not a territory of the U.S. subject to the laws and Constitution of the U.S.”?!
What kind of territory is it, then? A private Executive military reserve? But the military personnel there are subject to the laws of the U.S. and of the military, just as they are anywhere in the world. (Whether the laws have any effective meaning and whether they are enforced will be a separate question for the present legal theoretical consideration.) In other words, 1-isn’t such a clause legal nonsense to start with? and 2-more ominously, what is the intent of inserting that condition in the torture “ban”?
Or did I misunderstand Professor McCoy yesterday?

Posted by: small coke | Feb 19 2006 11:56 utc | 54

W/regards to b real’s post above, on the panopticon, I’m reminded of a quote I used for an anthro research paper:
..”the metaphorical illustration of a police officer hailing a man in the street-yelling out “You, there!” into the crowd of pedestrians. The man who turns – who recognizes the hail as meant for him – immediately admits his guilt and takes on himself the identity of the criminal (note that it is not necessary for the police officer to know anything about the hailed man’s guilt – it is the act of recognition which makes him guilty, rather than any previous knowledge on the part of the officer). In this sense he becomes subject to the domination of the legal apparatus.”
from “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” by Marxist philosopher Louis Pierre Althusser. Althusser is concerned with the way a State (in his conception, Western States, despite the fact that he describes Stalinist Communism almost to the letter…) creates appropriate subjects. On the one hand, he notes, there are Repressive State Apparatuses, such as the military, the police, mental institutions, and so on, which serve to impose certain behaviours and exclude others. The use of such apparatuses is costly, however, both in resources and in the potential threat of resistance. Ideally, then, domination is achieved through the creation of self-regulated subjects, accomplished though the Ideological Apparatuses of education, vocation, religion, and so on. The goal is the production of subjects who “recognize” themselves in terms of the state ideology.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 19 2006 12:33 utc | 55

@small coke
The mention in your post of the 1.7mil psychiatric wing made my heart sink and gave me cause for trepidation; Their relentless Aesopian Language, (i.e., communication that convey an innocent meaning to outsiders but hold a concealed meaning to informed members of a conspiracy or underground movement)never ceases to astound me.
For one of Professor McCoy’s salient points was in which he says, “Let’s make one thing clear. Americans refer to this often times in common parlance as “torture light.” Psychological to torture, people who are involved in treatment tell us it’s far more destructive, does far more lasting damage to the human psyche than does physical torture. As Senator McCain said, himself, last year when he was debating his torture prohibition, faced with a choice between being beaten and psychologically tortured, I’d rather be beaten.
Having said that, and knowing what I suspect (and this is highly complete, speculation) they could create an army of Patty Hearsts, political prisoners being brainwashed especially, with what is now known with 21st century brainwashing: and the science of thought control . The equivalent of the manchurian candidate.
Imagine, Gitmo-hypnotized, CIA trained and brain washed terrorist cells let loose on Merican soil -or any geostrategic place for that matter- and the havoc that could benefit the powers that be.
For example, Wilson explains how easy it is to “reduced the subject to infantile helplessness: for afterall, army is the ultimate model of all brainwashing experiences, whose politics is a matter of strength, stealth and treachery.Further, in Wilsons view, To create a new imprint, reduce the victim to an infantile state, i.e., first-circuit vulnerability.
Never the less, Western technology and the people who have employed it have been the most amazingly destructive forces in all of human history. We badly need the haudenosaunee, basic call to consciousness.
Or maybe, I just have a over reactive paranoid and pareidolia mind, drink far to much, or hell, not enough…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 19 2006 14:12 utc | 56

@small coke
Or did I misunderstand Professor McCoy yesterday?
I think you understood him perfectly.
The US gov of long ago: Torture is illegal.
The US gov of now: Torture is illegal exept on Guantanamo.
The meaning of this bill as far as I can see is to legalize torture at Guantanamo.

Posted by: A swedish kind of death | Feb 19 2006 19:18 utc | 57

uncle & small coke-
i will suggest that gitmo is a lab, that rumsfeld’s new category of pow’s are, in all practicality, one set of lab rats, those of a desired ethnicity & cultural makeup, and that the other set of lab rats are the judicial & legislative branches of the united states government, who are being monitored closely as they are led to press the desired levers.

Posted by: b real | Feb 19 2006 19:23 utc | 58

Malooga,
did you share your spam or was it a clever spambot? (Though rather stupid, in so far as noone is going to believe they).

Posted by: A swedish kind of death | Feb 19 2006 19:40 utc | 59

b real, yeah lab rats is about right. new orleans is another lab, hell we are all the lab rats.

Posted by: annie | Feb 19 2006 20:30 utc | 60

Uncle, small coke, and b real are correct to question the thinking behind the establishment of Gitmo and it is true an administration as unmitigatedly evil as this one is may indeed be capable of using such an establishment as a launching pad for ‘Manchurian Candidates’.
Here’s the thing; more than just evil itself is required for the success of that sort of project. The people in charge would need to be long term strategic thinkers, able to quickly grasp and counter people of all cultures’ fears, emotions and ambitions. Does that sound like BushCo to you?
No. Gitmo started off as a knee jerk reaction. Further if there is any ‘proof’ that the BushCo role in 9/11 didn’t go beyond ‘allowing/encouraging it to happen’ Gitmo is a key piece of evidence.
This was set up as a knee-jerk reaction to counter the squads of jihadists trained in OBL’s Afghani camps. Of course the whole premise it was founded on was faulty.
Like all bureaucrats the BushCo organisation imagined that whatever they were fighting would be the mirror image of themselves.
That is, a tightly organised, highly disciplined structure, with fighters at the pointy end and an army of logistics and technical support staff.
This is exactly the same error the DEA made and it has only realised the ‘truth’ in the last few years. The ‘truth’ is that people who actively ‘go against the flow’ are often independent thinkers who become uninvolved as quickly as they became involved. Structures of such people tend to be quite ‘loose’.
They perform tasks for as long as they have the desire then move on.
Of course there is a hard core structure and although at one time it may have numbered in the low hundreds, people would have come and gone from that as the fancy took them.
While traitors would almost certainly be punished by AQ it is unlikely those who did a couple of things with reasonable success and the moved on would suffer more than a valedictory.
So when the coalition of the killing marched into Afghanistan, it is probable that a swath of OBL’s trainees were already long gone. Many will have returned to the bourgois western existence they fled as adolescents and some will be graduating medicine, accountancy, engineering, or law about now.
Once Gitmo had been created the imperative which fuels all such enterprises kept the notion alive. Those who have worked in a large organisation should know exactly what I mean. Once annual ‘targets’ have been calculated and accepted by all parties, they are normally set in stone for at least that year.
A ‘new initiative’ will have targets which take even longer to dismantle especially if ‘outsiders’ are questioning its usefulness or the worthiness of the endeavour. The reason is simple. A number of people in the organisation will have built their reputations on the basis of the initiative so that flinching from it would be a public admission that they were wrong.
Maybe one day we can have a comparison of the most moronic objectives which any organisation has set any MoA-ite, but I’m gonna try not to let that divert me now.
So the shitkickers in the org now have to meet objectives which were set based upon a false premise and therefore cannot be met.
If you’re a company man this is really where the ‘rubber meets the road’. If you can meet this objective when all around believe it impossible but no-one has the balls to tell the bosses that they are wrong, wrong, wrong, there will be an opportunity to make the elevator to the top floor. This will happen as the ‘penny drops’ up on high and they begin to realise what an outstanding job you have done.
You must be ready to take that ride though because if you don’t hop aboard then, when the truth does come out if you haven’t made the leap away from the coal-face you are going to be number one prize patsy, all set to be ribboned and delivered up as scapegoat. One GENERAL GEOFFREY MILLER who hit the elevator running comes to mind here.
Another by-product of a bureaucratic bureacratic balls-up is the bandwagon jumpers. Those professional parasites eager to keep their snouts in the trough, jump onto to get whatver’s going while the going’s good.
This is a typical Halliburton scam and their Gitmo contract proves to me that this mess has moved well outside the planners’ predicted paradigm (see I can still remember some org-speak). The psychiatric wing also establishes this. It is possible that some local warlord did sell off the ‘nutters’ in his community as a way of turning a liability into an asset, but I’m willing to guarantee for many gitmo made them that way. This is a pretty normal reaction that people especially innocent ones have toward something as abnormal and plain ‘wrong’ as Gitmo. Many of the actual jihadists will still be able to motivate themselves by falling back on their core beliefs. Whereas a lot of those who have been innocently entangled will have nothing other than anger at injustice propelling them. A pretty grim form of sustenance for the psyche. In fact the experience in Australia of those held for too long under eerily similar protocols as Gitmo in Australian Federal Immigration Detention (AFID seems apt) have also had inmates suffering a much higher rate of psychiatric disability, than people from their place of origin do when permitted entry into the Australian community.
Well lookee here :
Halliburton Subsidiary Gets Contract to Add Temporary Immigration Detention Centers
So what I’m saying in typical longwinded fashion is that Gitmo won’t be closed until the incompetent, sadistic assholes who dreamed it up are convinced that keeping it open will be more damaging to them personally than closing it would be.
Because more than a few of these will be careerists rather than bushCo acolytes, it may take more than a simple change of government.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Feb 19 2006 22:45 utc | 61

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=loose+change“>loose change version 2 has probably been posted here before, but if anyone hasn’t seen it, i recommend.

Posted by: annie | Feb 19 2006 23:38 utc | 62

loose change version 2
whoops

Posted by: annie | Feb 19 2006 23:39 utc | 63

flashback — july 2005 : The Gitmo Experiment: How Methods Developed by the U.S. Military For Withstanding Torture are Being Used Against Detainees at Guantanamo Bay

A major article in this week’s issue of The New Yorker magazine reveals how methods developed by the US military for withstanding torture are being used against detainees at Guantanamo Bay.
According to the article, titled “The Gitmo Experiment,” a number of medical and scientific personnel working at Guantanmo Bay are not at the prison camp to provide care for detainees but rather to use their skills to assist in interrogations. The people working in this capacity are members of what are called Behavioral Science Consultation Teams or BSCT’s – in military jargon they are known simply as Biscuits.
After September 11th, interrogators and BSCT’s at Guantanamo were advised by psychologists and medical staff versed in techniques employed at a Pentagon-funded program known as SERE or “Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape.”
SERE was created by the Air Force, at the end of the Korean War, to teach pilots and other personnel considered at high risk of being captured by enemy forces how to withstand and resist extreme forms of abuse.
The New Yorker writes, “The theory behind the SERE program is that soldiers who are exposed to nightmarish treatment during training will be better equipped to deal with such terrors should they face them in the real world. Accordingly, the program is a storehouse of knowledge about coercive methods of interrogation.”
Those methods included desecration of religious texts such as the Bible, waterboarding, sexual embarrassment and humiliation.

new yorker: THE EXPERIMENT: The military trains people to withstand interrogation. Are those methods being misused at Guantánamo?

…a number of critics, including human-rights officials, detainees’ lawyers, and others with knowledge of the inner workings of the detention center, believe that the problems at Guantánamo are the result of a more systematic effort. The strange accounts of torment that have steadily emerged, these critics say, are connected to decades of research by American scientists into the psychological nature of warfare and captivity. The research, which began during the Cold War, developed new currency after September 11th, when the Bush Administration declared a global war on terror and began trying to extract intelligence from radical Islamists, many of whom have been trained not to reveal anything about their activities. Since 2001, the critics say, medical and scientific personnel have played a role, largely hidden, in helping to design and monitor interrogations that are intended to exploit the physical and mental vulnerabilities of detainees. According to a former interrogator at Guantánamo who was interviewed at length by a lawyer, behavioral scientists control the most minute details of interrogations, to the point of decreeing, in the case of one detainee, that he would be given seven squares of toilet paper per day.

the history of the united states possession of guantanamo bay here makes a few mentions of its selection as the base for a variety of experiments, primarily b/c of its uniqueness & proximity to the mainline. didn’t they also do some aids experimentation on haitian detainees/refugees prior to the blood for oil experiment?

Posted by: b real | Feb 20 2006 2:23 utc | 64

37 million poor hidden in the land of plenty

Americans have always believed that hard work will bring rewards, but vast numbers now cannot meet their bills even with two or three jobs. More than one in 10 citizens live below the poverty line, and the gap between the haves and have-nots is widening. Are you proud to be an American?

I suspect it’s more than that. Ever since Alexis de Tocqueville, foreign observers have consistently noted that the United States is one of the most religious countries on the face of the planet. Bill Bennett’s America sickens me.
I get so pissed off when I here lines like the following, “There will always be a poverty line, and a certain percentage of the population that lives below it” or any derivative thereof…
Jesus said, ” the poor will always be with you”…etc…
I suspect it comes out of the calvinist judao-Christian bullshit.. The Exegesis of the Soul is not found for me in the hallowed out shell of what passes for the “people of the book’ be it , Islam, Christianity or Judaism. They all seem like empty vessels, with whatever essence that was once there has dried up as a fig in the noonday sun.
Will we ever escape what some economists describe as the ‘scarcity models’ ?
As they say, jesus fed 2000 with 5 baskets of fish However, Hitler fed millions with a few sentences…

I paint them roughly
I paint them in my sleep
Ira
Gula
Luxuria
Heavy as their holes are deep
Roma
Roma
Where is my country
Yeshua
Yeshua
Where you go take me with thee


–Woven Hand : Consider The Birds

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 20 2006 4:58 utc | 65

HEADS UP KIDS, another PSA, BROUGHT TO YOU BY Uncle:
Live webcast (this morning)
ACLU’s National Town Hall on Illegal Spying: 2/20 at 11 am EST

Presidents Day morning, February 20, 2006, at 11:00 a.m. EST, the American Civil Liberties Union is holding a National Town Hall, via live streaming webcast, on the timely subject of Freedom at Risk: Spying, Secrecy and Presidential Power.
This event will be held at George Washington University, Jack Morton Auditorium, 805 21st St., NW, Washington, D.C., before a live audience, and will feature an impressive panel and be moderated by journalist Marvin Kalb. The panel will include:
Anthony D. Romero, ACLU Executive Director;
John W. Dean, former White House counsel;
Laurence H. Tribe, Professor of Constitutional Law, Harvard University;
Jim Harper, Cato Institute; and
Mary DeRosa, Center for Strategic and International Studies.

attydave writes, “This should obviously be a hard-hitting and substantive forum on the illegal and unconstitutional NSA spying program and a powerful push-back at BushCo’s pack of lies in attempting to justify it.”
We’ll see or not…
as Blake said, “One law for the Lion and different one for the Ox is Tyranny.”

Posted by: PSA from Uncle $cam | Feb 20 2006 8:07 utc | 66

FRANCIS FUKUYAMA: After Neoconservatism

Neoconservatism, whatever its complex roots, has become indelibly associated with concepts like coercive regime change, unilateralism and American hegemony. What is needed now are new ideas, neither neoconservative nor realist, for how America is to relate to the rest of the world — ideas that retain the neoconservative belief in the universality of human rights, but without its illusions about the efficacy of American power and hegemony to bring these ends about.

Posted by: b | Feb 20 2006 8:43 utc | 67

Jimmy Carter: Don’t Punish the Palestinians

During this time of fluidity in the formation of the new government, it is important that Israel and the United States play positive roles. Any tacit or formal collusion between the two powers to disrupt the process by punishing the Palestinian people could be counterproductive and have devastating consequences.
Unfortunately, these steps are already underway and are well known throughout the Palestinian territories and the world. Israel moved yesterday to withhold funds (about $50 million per month) that the Palestinians earn from customs and tax revenue. Perhaps a greater aggravation by the Israelis is their decision to hinder movement of elected Hamas Palestinian Legislative Council members through any of more than a hundred Israeli checkpoints around and throughout the Palestinian territories. This will present significant obstacles to a government’s functioning effectively. Abbas informed me after the election that the Palestinian Authority was $900 million in debt and that he would be unable to meet payrolls during February. Knowing that Hamas would inherit a bankrupt government, U.S. officials have announced that all funding for the new government will be withheld, including what is needed to pay salaries for schoolteachers, nurses, social workers, police and maintenance personnel. So far they have not agreed to bypass the Hamas-led government and let humanitarian funds be channeled to Palestinians through United Nations agencies responsible for refugees, health and other human services.
This common commitment to eviscerate the government of elected Hamas officials by punishing private citizens may accomplish this narrow purpose, but the likely results will be to alienate the already oppressed and innocent Palestinians, to incite violence, and to increase the domestic influence and international esteem of Hamas. It will certainly not be an inducement to Hamas or other militants to moderate their policies.

Posted by: b | Feb 20 2006 9:11 utc | 68

Israel’s policies are feeding the cancer of anti-semitismI say all this despairing of the Israel I love. Its people are my people. The Palestinians are my neighbours. I wish they had stronger and better leaders. I wish their despairing young people had not been driven to violence. Just as I understand Jewish fears, I understand their despair. Only an Israel that understands that too can change it. And there are Jews in Israel and in the diaspora who know it. Most of them, out of a fear of being thought disloyal, are afraid to say what they know to be true. The state of Israel has become a cruel occupying power. Occupations, when they are resisted, are never benevolent. They morally corrupt the occupier. The brave body of Israeli conscientious objectors are the true inheritors of the prophets of Israel. They are the true patriots. What nation has ever loved its prophets?
But the main objective of my writing today, is to nail the lie that to reject Zionism as it practised today is in effect to be anti-semitic, to be an inheritor of Hitler’s racism. That argument, with the Holocaust in the background, is nothing other than moral blackmail. It is highly effective. It condemns many to silence who fear to be thought anti-semitic. They are often the very opposite. They are often people whose heart bleeds at Israel’s betrayal of its true heritage.
I began with the recognition that the cancer of anti-semitism has not been cured. Tragically, Israel’s policies feed it – and when world Jewry defends Israeli policies right or wrong, then anger turns not only against Israel, but against all Jews. I wish it were mere rhetoric to say that Israeli politics today make a holocaust the day after tomorrow credible. If the whole Muslim world hates Israel, that is no idle speculation. To count on Arab disunity and Muslim sectarian conflict and a permanent American shield is no recipe for long-term security.

Posted by: b | Feb 20 2006 9:36 utc | 69

Where did the Americans learn their humiliation tactics ?
Secrets Of Unit 1391
Uncovering an Israeli jail that specializes in nightmares.

By Dan Ephron
Newsweek
June 28 issue – Sometimes a country’s darkest secrets have a way of surfacing in the most offhanded manner. Gad Kroizer, an Israeli historian, was researching old British police buildings when he stumbled on a 70-year-old map drawn by a government architect. The map showed the location of 62 police compounds built by the British in Palestine in the late 1930s and early 1940s where both Arabs and Jews who agitated against Britain’s occupation were interrogated. What caught Kroizer’s eye was a camp called Meretz, which he had not seen on any contemporary Israeli map or read about in any modern writing on security compounds in the Jewish state. “There was a discrepancy between the map I had and the lists I’d been looking at,” says Kroizer, who lives in Jerusalem and teaches at Bar-Ilan University. “I started putting two and two together.”
What Kroizer had discovered and later footnoted in an academic paper (published in the March 2004 issue of Cathedra, circulation: 1,500) was the location of an ultrasecret jail where Israel has held Arabs in total seclusion for years, barred visits by the Red Cross and allegedly tortured inmates. Known as 1391, the facility is used as an interrogation center by a storied unit of Israel’s military intelligence, whose members—all Arabic speakers—are trained to wring confessions from the toughest militants. According to Arabs who’ve been imprisoned in 1391, some of the methods are reminiscent of Abu Ghraib: nudity as a humiliation tactic, compromising photographs, sleep deprivation. In a few cases, at least, interrogators at 1391 appear to have gone beyond Israel’s own hair-splitting distinction between torture and what a state commission referred to in 1987 as “moderate physical pressure.”

What was that de Goya quote? Oh yeah, “from the sleep of reason…”
geez…

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 20 2006 10:30 utc | 70

Addendum, a commenter over at Rigorous Intuition, which never fails to creep me out wrote,

“But Gideon Ezra, the former deputy head of Israel’s Shabak security service, says psychological pressure is one of the most effective tools interrogators have in the war against terrorism.”
Me thinks it is rather the “war against Terra”… Might not working towards more just societies/systems be a somewhat “better” tool in preventing violence?
Naked pyramids…more clay bricks and straw? Who is still dwelling in Egypt?
Perhaps the ritualistic tortures are being used to produce more tools to keep the unrest going…what better way to produce mind-manipulated puppets to carry out your black ops when one needs a nice compliant “Arab” for false flag ops?

It strikes me a amusing, that we had the same or maybe, paralax ideals. And I believe his post was prior to Alfred McCoys recent revolations..

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 20 2006 10:55 utc | 71

short interview w/ michael parenti on his latest book, the culture struggle

Posted by: b real | Feb 20 2006 16:23 utc | 72

the nra conference on c span right now is good, the guy talking now is saying there is no war on terror we are just occupying iraq.” lost respect for rule of law”, applause…
fitz on the warpath

Posted by: annie | Feb 20 2006 17:35 utc | 73

b real,
ordered it, maybe i’ll report on it

Posted by: anna missed | Feb 20 2006 19:19 utc | 74

lego police surveillance truck building toy

Posted by: b real | Feb 20 2006 19:30 utc | 75

@ b real – Legos are made in Denmark, right?

Posted by: beq | Feb 20 2006 19:56 utc | 76

Lego is a danish company, but I bet it is made in China.
Without some sort of reference to a Lego-page or a certain store or something I have a hard time believing the surveillance truck. Photoshop is easy, anybody can do it.

Posted by: A swedish kind of death | Feb 20 2006 22:16 utc | 77

@skod
looks like the world city theme – ala blade runner or something – was first issued in 2003. here’s the lego product page. there’s also an unmarked police van,
and an armoured car. “Crooks can try to slow it down, but no barricade can stop the armoured car!”
i’ll let you know when i find the product page showing kids trying to piece the u.s. constitution back together again in lego blocks. 😉

Posted by: b real | Feb 20 2006 23:19 utc | 78

Ok,
I do not know what to say. Lego used to be innocent building blocks and genderneutral small figures. At least that was how I remembered it.
Look at the smirk on this one. They sure keep up with the times.

Posted by: A swedish kind of death | Feb 20 2006 23:59 utc | 79

I remember castles and knights. “We are red, we are white, we are Danish dynamite.”

Posted by: beq | Feb 21 2006 0:17 utc | 80

Legos started changing in the late 1980s-early 1990s, and for a simple reason: there are only so many boxes of otherwise identical bricks that you can convince people to buy. And since Lego bricks are made of plastic, they don’t go bad. So in order to boost sales, they started coming out with sets containing specialized pieces. There were Castle Legos, and Town Legos, and Space Legos, then Technic Legos (with little snap-on gears), and so on. Each set generally had some single piece which only came with that set. But eventually, they ran out of ideas even for those categories, and started reworking things. (So, for example, “Space” Legos became “Blacktron” — with mostly the same pieces, but in different colors.) Most recently, they’ve been doing movie tie-ins. And, of course, these charming little toys for Hitler Youth.

I wonder whether all this was to avoid bankruptcy (which would be understandable, though not necessarily forgivable) or merely to make more money than they otherwise would.

Posted by: The Truth Gets Vicious When You Corner It | Feb 21 2006 1:27 utc | 81