Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 17, 2006
Carrots and Sticks

Karl Rove has threatened Republican Senators not to get into the way of Bush`s NSA spying program:

[T]he White House has offered to help loyalists with money and free publicity, such as appearances and photo-ops with the president.

That carrot has worked with some, especially with Senator Pat Roberts, the Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Senator Pat Roberts of Kansas, said the White House had agreed in principle to negotiate on legislation that would give Congress authority to oversee the eavesdropping.

"The administration is now committed to legislation and has agreed to brief more Intelligence Committee members on the nature of the surveillance program," Mr. Roberts said, adding that "the administration has come a long way in the last month."

Roberts wants to legalize a program the White House all along maintains is legal and he wants to do so without investigating what the program is all about. In exchange he may get some of the oversight Congress is already entitled to have.

But while Roberts is engaged in a personal inspection of the inside of Rove’s abdomen, those carrots have not worked with everybody.

Senator Arlen Specter, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, is still pressing for more investigations and for legislation to put the spying program back under control of the FISA court – until now.

But on Tuesday, suddenly and without any reference to sources, USA Today reported: "Senate aide’s spouse gets a windfall":

Sen. Arlen Specter helped direct almost $50 million in Pentagon spending during the past four years to clients of the husband of one of his top aides, records show.

Specter, R-Pa., used a process called "earmarking" 13 times to set aside $48.7 million for six clients represented by lobbyist Michael Herson and the firm he co-founded, American Defense International. The clients paid Herson’s firm nearly $1.5 million in fees since 2002, federal lobbying records show.

Specter, as well as the lobbyist, deny, with some plausibility, any connection. There is no relation to the Abramoff or other scandals and all the earmarks did benefit Specter’s constituency in Pennsylvania. Specter himself has asked the Senate Ethics Committee to investigate.

But why does this story pop up now? Who initiated it?

Doesn´t this look like a big stick is being used after Specter denied to take Rove’s carrot.

Some blogs on the left fail to ask these questions and to recognize the real plot. They are pursuing Rove’s plans.

The story now drowns out Specter’s initiative on the NSA case. The beat of these drums will increase. Either he will fold, or there will be more stories like this until he is out.

But whatever Specter will do, the spying scandal will not go away. I tend to agree with Glenn Greenwald’s hope:

[T]his scandal has many tentacles. And each of them is growing inexorably. The White House is running around with a broom desperately trying to sweep each branch under the rug (..), but once the mechanisms of the Washington scandal machine are activated with full-force, it is very difficult to simply shut them off or the prevent the disclosure of information which someone is trying to conceal.

Rove’s carrots and sticks will only prolong the scandal. Specter may fold under one leaked lobbying story or another, but the NSA spying outrage will not go away.

Watch for more leaks on more programs. So far only the surface has been scratched.

Comments

how many blackmail scenarios does rove have under his belt? he’s probably been collecting data for decades ready to unleash whenever anyone steps out of line. kudos for you noticing.

Posted by: annie | Feb 17 2006 17:16 utc | 1

Perhaps the revelation of the relations of priests with youths was not accidental but served to vaporize any moral influence that the Catholic church might have had regarding the Iraq invasion. I remember how the NYT hammered day after day the stories of lascivious priests. Who gave the information and why at such an opportune time? I suspect but I will not say. cui bono?

Posted by: jlcg | Feb 17 2006 17:22 utc | 2

from the john perkins interview on democracynow last wednesday

[Perkins] …I was one of the speakers at the World Social Forum in Brazil in last February, and a man asked to meet with me who was a very high advisor to Lula. And he said, “You know, what you say in your book is all very true, but you just — that’s just the tip of the iceberg.” He said, “You know, from the time I was a very young man, I was quite radical. And it was interesting to me, as I was going through university, how much sex, drugs, booze were available to me in the parties that I was invited to, and so on. And now that I’m in this position of power, I discover that somebody was taking pictures of all those things, that there’s a record of this.”
And he says, “You don’t realize how all-pervasive your Secret Services are. It’s recruiting, in their own way, young people, even those that are extreme socialists and communists. Your people befriend us from very early ages and get a lot of information on us. So when we become high up in the government, they basically –” And I said, “They blackmail you?” And he said, “Well, you could use the word ‘blackmail,’ but I think I would prefer that’s ‘modern U.S. diplomacy.’”
And I asked him, I said, “Well, is Lula a part of this?” And he obviously didn’t really want to answer this question. He hesitated, and he said, “Let me just say that nobody gets to power in Brazil these days without being very willing to make compromises to your corporations and your government.” He said, “I think Lula’s a very, very good man, but he also has to deal with reality. And certainly, he’s been watched all of his life, and I’m sure he’s had the same temptations I did.”
AMY GOODMAN: And he’s also engulfed in a major corruption scandal, which, for many of his long-time supporters, Brazilians and outside, are raising a lot of questions.
JOHN PERKINS: And I think the fact that the scandal has come out and has been blown into such proportions is an indication that someone is sending Lula a very strong message. Incidentally, the jackal – I’ll call him – that was working with Gutierrez of Ecuador said to me, “You know, this isn’t limited to other countries. This happens in your country, too. Don’t you think that the assassination of John Kennedy and Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King and John Lennon and others like that, and the many senators that have died in airplane crashes and other things, has sent a strong message to your politicians? And don’t you think that –”

also, amy interviews dr. alfred mccoy on democracynow today [friday the 17th] on the history of the cia use of torture

Posted by: b real | Feb 17 2006 17:34 utc | 3

Democracy Now thrashed the corporate media today! A must listen and watch for everyone.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 17 2006 18:13 utc | 4

I totally agree malooga, here’s the Professor McCoy Exposes the History of CIA Interrogation, From the Cold War to the War on Terror link.
I can’t wait for the transcript, there were several points Dr.McCoy made that I want to explore.
If you haven’t ever listened or watched DemocracyNow, this one is a award winner. When I compare their coverage of news, well, there just isn’t a comparison . Apples and oranges.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 17 2006 18:55 utc | 5

So Bush is attacking members of his own party directly now? I’m hoping that the ‘opposition party within the party’ we’ve been seeing off and on since Katrina actually mobilizes in response to this.
Speaking of Katrina, I’ve started writing a series of essays about my experiences with the storm. Is there any place that the people here know of that would be appropriate to post them, and where people would see them?

Posted by: Keith | Feb 17 2006 19:32 utc | 6

@Uncle$cam:
I was thinking of you while listening today. Good to hear we are on the same wavelength.
@”apples and oranges”, a brief, humorous, and true, story, for comic relief:
A number of years ago, I was taking a romantic vacation on the French Carribean island of St. Barts with a passionate new love interest of mine. We had dinner, took in some nightlife, strolled through the town, and finally settled into an outdoor cafe for a brief nightcap before rushing headlong to the cool tropical breezes, warm sheets, and soft mattress that had been beckoning us with increasing urgency as the evening progressed. Feeling very continental, she ordered a “Grand Marnier”; I ordered a “Calvados.” We sipped our drinks as we gazed into each other’s eyes. In the spirit of sharing, we exchanged drinks, and felt the new, strange, spirits burn our nostrils and commingle with the fragrant tropical air.
These exotic liquors were new to my paramour, a range-raised midwestern lass. She struggled to rise to the elegance the occasion demanded. “Which do you like better,” she enquired.
With care and deliberation, I took a slow, long sip from each drink. My eyes moved away from the sidewalk cafe we sat in, to the black waters of the harbor at night, on my left, and the gaily painted sailboats bobbing up and down in the tide. After a moment of reflection, I returned my gaze to the soft blue eyes that eagerly awaited my wise and considered response.
“It’s kind of like comparing apples and oranges,” I replied……

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 17 2006 20:03 utc | 7

@Keith:
email b and see if he has interest in posting them here. I know I’d be interested.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 17 2006 20:05 utc | 8

uncle
alfred mccoy really know his stuff. his groundbreaking work on the politics of heroin in south east asia rests a foundation work on the study of how american policy is practically practiced

Posted by: r’giap | Feb 17 2006 22:26 utc | 9

annie @ the top of the thread asks ‘how many scenarios does Monseigneur Karl have under his belt.’
To which I would answer – it’s immaterial.
After all, it’s not as if they have to have any basis in fact whatsoever.
Heckfire, this is nothing more than the old ‘make the bastard deny it’ strategy hyped-up with an IV mainlining Oxy straight to greed centers in the midbrain.
Put another way, all the Monseigneur has to do is float it through his info-dom minions to get the bastards to swoon, because he knows that, like him, they know that, in their heart of hearts, they are all dirty and can’t stand up to detailed scrutiny regardless the accusation.
______
Great post Bernhard, and excellent point about the left-side big boys being played for saps.
.

Posted by: RossK | Feb 17 2006 23:01 utc | 10

All Wight, I want them all, Doc.
If I don’t get them, I’ll have to blast you!

Posted by: Bugzy B | Feb 18 2006 2:05 utc | 11

The issue isn’t on NSA, ‘to spy or not to spy’, it’s the revelations that will come out of any investigation, that the NSA has been spying for years already, and data mining to our enemies.
They already knew about the attacks on the WTO
through this data-mining, and they turned away,
just like they knew about Katrina, but went shoe shopping and bar hopping, instead of responding.
Full-spectrum surveillance, conveyed information search and integration, and data mining results
just the tip of an iceberg on the event-horizon.
http://tinyurl.com/ckea7
Just heard the US ambassador to the UK on BBC radio 4 this morning (about 8:15). An interesting argument: “the rules of war trump human rights”. The mask seems to be slipping a bit.

Posted by: Araneidae | Feb 18 2006 8:27 utc | 12

@RossK et al,
I’m as sick, sick of the designer pathologies of the seligmanized Republicans and their counterpart, zimbardo–esqe Democrats as anyone, in the real world of brutal injustice RIP Gary Webb, Jonathan Kwitny, Alfred McCoy…
If we are ever to escape the straight jacket of true/false aristotelian logic, i.e., The ratchet effect we are going to have to think our way past the binary lockbox (w/apologies to Gore). I applaude Bernhards, and excellent posts however, the “point about the left-side big boys being played for saps.” is bullshit. They are playing their assigned role.
Beyond Surreal? Sure, but stay w/me for a moment, in Antony Sutton’s explosive book Wall Street and FDR (1975) he exposes how certain Wall Street bankers who financed the Bolshevik revolution in Russia also financed the rise of the upcomming US president Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the new deal. The reality of the grim meathook future before us is the same as it’s always been, only we have pasted the entropy event horizon and it’s shit shit shit from here on out… they own both parties.
A few good Greeks knew hope was the elixir of fools and a jape of the gods. This didn’t keep them from employing it to keep themselves among the living, but it did frame the whole matter of optimism in a different light.
Bourdieu was right. It’s not [just]”follow the money” [anymore] but rather “follow the status of the job or social position”
Propaganda is now propagenda.
Okay. Say whatever you want, but for God’s sake, stop saying you’re “ashamed.” I understand shame to be a community-building emotion that ties people together in mutual identification, but the time for that is now officially over.
You didn’t torture anybody in Iraq. You didn’t pose for pictures. You didn’t defend it or slyly rationalize it away. You didn’t cheer for it. You didn’t vote for it (and you had your vote stolen.) And yet every day for four years you’ve been called traitors and scum on morning radio and CNN because the totalitarian impulse of the redneck hive mind cannot tolerate even the smallest degree of disagreement or emotional friction. And the fact is that when the right comes for you, at your house, the leering soldiers in those photos are the soldiers that will be knocking on the door. They’re America. MacLeod is right: you can feel the decadence now, the cultural deathwish.
They don’t acknowledge your right to participate in politics or national identification; they don’t acknowledge any citizen consubstantiality with you. They don’t acknowledge any rules of civility or fair play, and their less than secret attitude toward you is as eliminationist as it is toward “terrorists”– a category which you now explicitly occupy. They have the cultural majority (stop whistling in the dark), they have three branches of government, and a propagenda machine that has nearly 60% of the population believing that we found WMD in Iraq. So approximately that percentage will buy whatever rightwing fraternity-hazin’ spin on these or other photos of torture, rape, decapitation. Or anything else that crops up. “So what? It’s war.” So as much, with the democrats.
They’re not nationalists, they’re tribalists. And you don’t belong to the tribe any more than the detainees. They’ve made that quite clear.
On the eve of the bombing of Afghanistan, abcnews online ran a jarring excerpt from Jarhead, a Marine’s Gulf War memoir, describing the masturbatory bloodlust of solidiers looking forward to killing, any killing, for its own sake. With all the bloviating binaries about barbarian them and noble us, it stood out, and you had to wonder about the timing: what was the motive for publishing that?
No: it wasn’t some “critique” by the “liberal media.” Of all the moments in the century’s history, one can safely say that on that eve, the liberal media did not exist. On the contrary, it was sensationalist media showing its id, playing to what it knew people really wanted, playing to the imagination of unfettered vengeance and warlust without rules. Similarly, on the same eve, the “liberal warbloggers” were writing utterly inauthentic little tight-lipped moral meditations about the tragedy of war before they relaxed into left-baiting glee and den Bestian “rules of war are for the liberal pussy” cheers and jazzed passion about how exciting warblogging was, it was like in the early days of the internet, trading cool zingers with their friends! Human rights agencies were saying that if food shipments were unluckily delayed by war or weather, the death toll could rise as high as six million. Familiar number. Meanwhile the new coalition of neocons and Huntingtonian liberals were engaged in a contest: hey, what’s your favorite war movie? I just watched Lawrence of Arabia. Awesome! “I’m a strong liberal, but…” The mask slips, and what’s behind it is disgusting. I didn’t even disagree with the realpolitik argument about Afghanistan, but I haven’t forgotten that. I will not forget it. I spent the weekend after 9/11 in the hospital, not because I was afraid of being bombed, but because I held a baby in my arms and understood the tipping point that had been crossed, I knew the rot that was coming, and I knew there would be no way back from it because people wanted it, longed for it. The right could do anything, could fuck everything over, could wreck the culture, could even self-destruct before our eyes–as they have–and over half the country would continue to reward them for it, all the way down the black hole. Nothing has proven me wrong since then, not one thing. Everything I saw looking down the future has happened.
And the rot is just beginning. Imagine what it will be in ten, twenty years. When your kid is your age. Winning this or that election is irrelevant on the larger time scale. It’s only a question of pacing.
It’s not your country anymore, and those who own it are vile.
Yes. It’s hard to bear. Impossible to bear. Hide? Fight Alamo-style? Emigrate? I have no advice.
But at least this: enough already with being “ashamed.” What–on their behalf, like Jesus, because they’re incapable of the emotion? Even as they’re already blithely rewriting the history of their own position-taking, devoid of responsibility? Still playing Diogenes, looking for the honest conservative with your lantern? For Diogenes, it was a joke. You?
Enough with being “ashamed.” No. Don’t bear their fucking guilt for them.
Don’t forget the whisky.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 18 2006 8:43 utc | 13

@Keith – you can send your writings to MoonofA at aol.com. If it’s good, I’ll put it up here.

Posted by: b | Feb 18 2006 10:06 utc | 14

uncle
yup.

Posted by: slothrop | Feb 18 2006 16:07 utc | 15

yeah, uncle, some rant, one of the best.
But remember there is still us against them,and positive change can happen.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 18 2006 16:31 utc | 16

Uncle Scam, I’ve often wondered what went through the mind of my friend who killed himself about 10 hours after 9/11. All I know is that he watched TV, smoked a pack of cigarettes (after being a non smoker for many years), made no phone calls, and then took the dog out.
The dog came home alone.
JM was religious. He believed both in a compassionate God and the fundamental goodness of humanity. His despair can only be measured by the fact that he was a single father, and loved his sons, then aged 15 and 10.
While the perspective /position is obviously different, I found some elements in your post that echoed or reverberated to him, that pointed to some vein of universal outrage, and for that I thank you.

Posted by: Noisette | Feb 18 2006 16:53 utc | 17

u.s. ambassador to the u.k.: “the rules of war trump human rights”
major-general andrew jackson to his soldiers: “It is indeed lamentable, that the path to peace should lead through blood, and over the bodies of the slain: but it is a dispensation of Providence, to inflict partial evils that good may be produced.”[source]
letter from an american officer who had served in the philippines: “There is no use mincing words…If we decide to stay, we must bury all qualms and scruples about Weylerian cruelty, the consent of the governed, etc., and stay. We exterminated the American Indians, and I guess most of us are proud of it, or, at least, believe the end justified the means; and we must have no scruples about exterminating this other race standing in the way of progress and enlightenment, if it is necessary.”
tocqueville: “It is impossible to destroy more men with more respect to the laws of humanity.”

Posted by: b real | Feb 18 2006 19:15 utc | 18

Don’t feel ashamed….
It’s getting to the point where going out to dinner is becoming surreal for me. I look around the room at working class white America out for a night of entertainment. I watch the immigrant chef juggling the utentsils as he makes lame jokes. [What does he really think of us?] I hear the laughter and the applause. I see the steaming portions which are too big for even the obese guy at the table. I murmur thank-you. I lift the chopsticks. I chew. But I can’t enjoy it; I stare right through the plate, right through the faces, right through the walls. None of it matters to me. I am somewhere else tonight: with the terrified and the silenced ones. Don’t these people know what’s happening? They are clueless and I dislike them for it. What am I doing here?
Ignorance is bliss, and I know too eff’n much.

Posted by: gylangirl | Feb 18 2006 19:20 utc | 19

From a long time lurker… does any of y’all know if Arlen flies much in small planes? Just a rhetorical question.
TIA

Posted by: Karl | Feb 18 2006 20:14 utc | 20

gylandgirl, i’ve been there. you know what’s weird? most of the few people i interact with don’t follow politics. or if they do they don’t think about it much, and they don’t really want to discuss it much. i can go on and on, and i think they may think spending lunch w/me is a way of catching up on some latest international news that they take w/a grain of salt. the people i have met here in seattle in the political world are competitive, it’s like a club to a certain degree, and i have no desire to attain some standing in a group. so for the most part, my political actions are with friends i connect w/on the internet, some of whom are friends and relatives of mine in ‘real life’. lately i have been home most of the time because my studio is here and i need to get a lot of work done, but when i venture downtown its not for very long. sometimes i look around me and wonder how people can blissfully go about their lives when the world is crumbling, then i realize i probably need to get out more and be like them! sort of. my family thinks my politics is over the top, tho they largly agree w/me, it safer talking about a movie they saw last week.
ignorance is bliss. i could just swear off reading for a month.
today i need to get some work photographed, on the drive there i will look around and pretend the world is normal.

Posted by: annie | Feb 18 2006 20:56 utc | 21

Good one uncle,
The ratchet effect link was particularly interesting when followed through the successive chapters — that outline the evolution of the democratic party shifting position on race relations ( how they, the party of slavery, jim crow, and segregation, took up the liberal cause with roosevelt, and handing their historic position over to the republicans as in nixons “southern strategy”). The secondary point being the partys themselves are ideologically amorphus, and therefore interchangeable — and always “ratcheting” to the right, with the exception of roosevelt who was able to actively integrate true leftist politics into the party. Which I think the author is trying to introduce as a strategy for the dems while staying within the two party format.
What strikes me as particularly sinister is the fact that both partys have used the elements of exceptionalism in such a way that implicitly utilizes the peoples worst instincts, such as racism, and personalizes it in exceptionalist tribal language as (in say)”freedom”, all of which cloaks the real agenda of capital accumulation, as it hollows out the last vestages of the ghost of roosevelt. And while exceptionalism is often hailed as the reason socialism has never taken root in america (as if there was no need for it) whats increasingly clear, is that exceptionalism, has been and is the militant prohibition to the mediating effects of socialism. Hence, the everpresent and omnipresent fatalism of being in the ranks of lemmings rushing for the abyss.

Posted by: anna missed | Feb 18 2006 21:08 utc | 22

ps,last night i listened to both the democracy now interviews linked. it makes me feel sane in a certain way, like these witnesses to reality , and you guys, are my link to reality. but it’s absurd, because reality is also right out my window, the leaves are blowing etc. but the amount of people suffering so that i can ‘only’ experience the leaves blowing is a juxtaposition i can almost not abide. but i do abide to a degree i guess or i would go crazy. but i am very nuanced to the subtle programing in even the slightest attempts to subvert my thinking. i have to keep some grasp on whta is really happening. after all, i am the person who difiantly told my mother when i was 2 1/2 ‘santa isn’t real and reindeer don’t fly’ she just told me not to tell my older sister. where does it stop? does the nsa/rove have files on every senator? does an honest person have any chance of rising to power?
is there any way we can change the direction things are moving. or is the globe in the next 20 years, in my lifetime going to resemble a science foction movie? unrecognizable. obviously it’s going to be as radically different as horse and buggy is to rockets. so , i guess the sane response is to keep your wits about you, my eyes open, and live ‘normally’. communicate ‘normally’. instead of staring right thru the plate.

Posted by: annie | Feb 18 2006 21:10 utc | 23

@Uncle$
Wow.
Maybe I should get out my prod a little more often.
.

Posted by: RossK | Feb 18 2006 21:14 utc | 24

@annie,
just because those who don’t pay attention are acting as if up is down, as if wrong is right, and as if sane is crazy — doesn’t make it so. The juxtaposition IS absurd.
But you’re right, I can’t stay in grief/empathy/shame/shocked/anger mode constantly so I will breathe the deep breath; and accept that I am; and act as if I may make a small difference.
‘Truth will set you free. But first it will piss you off.’ — Gloria Steinem

Posted by: gylangirl | Feb 18 2006 21:53 utc | 25

@ gylangirl-
Pwhew. You said it. It’s like inhabiting another reality. A Cassandra reality, where you can see what is happening and what is going to happen, while all around you people are blind and unbelieving, regarding you as mad. Even your therapist thinks you are mad, and chastises you with increasing frustration that you refuse to be like other people. “I can’t help you become well-adjusted if you persist in these destructive beliefs,” he sighs, as you fork over another 95 bucks.
You are like an addict enmeshed in his own addiction. You make tortured resolutions with yourself in the middle of the night: “I will not go to ‘Moon of Alabama’ and read any more of Uncle $cam’s links. I will listen to NPR like all other good members of the intellectual class, and calmly discuss events,and Jay Leno’s jokes about them, around the watercooler of a nice fortune 500 corporation; the type my mother told me I should marry.”
You go to the supermarket and bump into your neighbor. They have just bought a new SUV, and are talking about going to Europe this summer. You are about to respond, but the words form the thought, “I wonder if Europe will still exist this summer…” You catch the words before they come out, but can only respond with a tortured “Ughhhh huhhhh.” They look at you a little strange and make a beeline for the Chilean berries.
You try but you just can’t control yourself. Even when you listen to NPR with your friends, you both hear completely different newscasts. They feel reassured that there is a voice out there that they can trust in trying times. They enjoy the insider cultural shibboleths sprinkled liberally throughout the humorous adventures of reassuring college professors and other commentators. You hear something else entirely. The newscasters appear to be reading through the pages of 1984. You catch yourself subconsciously angling out of the line of sight of the radio.
Like any addict, you struggle with your addiction. You make more private bargains, which you know even as you make them that you will not keep.
You go to the online dating site which you are a member of and stare at pictures of happy attractive people of the opposite sex. They work for a pharmaceutical company, making $150K+ selling drugs to doctors and hospitals, and they write, “I enjoy helping people.” They work for a large defense contractor, and they write, “I feel good that I am doing my part to help keep America safe.” They work in ‘financial services,’ and they write, “I help people use their money to make more money,” and you know what that means. They all describe themselves as caring, honest. They all list 10-15 third world countries that they have visited, “The natives were so friendly”, and 10 more they want to visit. They feel important, validated by these experiences, which confirm them as part of the “Masters of the Universe.”
You and your family regard each other with mutual suspicion: Perhaps babies were accidentally exchanged at the hospital. You’ve been through the fights, and the discussions. “Dear, you will give your father a heart attack if you persist in this hate. Have you been taking your pills lately?”
Somedays, you wake in a cold sweat, surprised to see the sun shing through the trees. Other days you think, “Well, the only way they can do what they’re doing is to maintain this veneer of normalcy. People have power, but if they keep people ignorant and content, then they can continue with their crimes. Therefore, whenever I get scared, I know that there is always room for me to be ignorant and content. I can be happy. There is a way. There is a place for me in this world.” But you know you are rationalizing; fooling yourself so you can breathe without that familiar tightness in your chest.
You engage in your activism, but the fear continues to strengthen. You look behind yourself when coming home late at night. You wish you had the courage of Martin, of Malcolm, of Medgar, who knew what the future had in store for them, and carried on with their work. But they had supportive families, you recall.
You used to love your meditation, but somehow it doesn’t feel the same since finding out that the Dalai Lama was on the CIA payroll. Timothy Leary was on the payroll. How about Ram Dass, you think. Was Buddha on the payroll back then, you wonder. Was he paid off to sit under a tree and keep still? Was he paid to not reveal what he knew, and now we regard silence as holy.
How will it all end you wonder? You watch your hair slowly turn grey. All the things you used to lose yourself in; drugs, sex, travel, money, power, no longer satisfy the same way. Even food. Food which you used to love, is now Frankenfood; just one more statement of corporate control of your very existence.
So you stay away from things for a while, then you drift back. After all, you tell yourself, “One day soon they will close down the internet. Then I will regret all the time I stayed away, like an ostrich with its head covered to keep it safe.”
So it goes, day by day. Taking life day by day. Stepping gingerly in a new reality. Feeling out the appropriate response to an insane world. Perhaps there is no sane response, just the best you can do. You try not to blame yourself. Global warming has saved me money on my heating bill, you smirk. Anyway, the lobster didn’t waste his time blaming himself while the water in the pot grew warmer.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 19 2006 0:33 utc | 26

Gee Malooga,
In such cases, dont do what I did last year, which was to go on a camping trip to get away from it all. At least dont go to — and this is the most perfect name — Deception Pass state park in Washington State. Because, we (my wife) thought it would be good to escape all the bad news (and my late night blogging “habit”) and take the kids up to this park for a couple of nights. It looked like a nice place, with a dramatic high bridge, nice coastline beach, and, there’s nothing in the literature about this, that the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station is a mere 3 miles down the beach. So as you can imagine, that in addition to all the pecularities that have evolved into the american camping trip, about 5 minutes after the tent and all is set up — the A-6 Navy bombers began taking off, one after the other, and arching around just so precisely, as to fly directly over the camp ground in a steep ear shattering ascent. And this went on until one or two in the morning. We had to literally shout at each other to be heard, out there in the middle of the woods. Fortunatly, everyone managed to get asleep between the missions, except for me, who ended up in the car with the windows rolled up and a sixpack trying to read Che-Guevera with a flashlight.
Just thought I’d share that with you.(smile)

Posted by: anna missed | Feb 19 2006 1:33 utc | 27

Thanks for the endorphins, malooga and anna missed.
LOL

Posted by: gylangirl | Feb 19 2006 2:03 utc | 28

Imagine that you are communing with nature on a hilltop(actually answering a nature call) when the A-6s come screaming over 150 ft off the deck.
Can you sue them for Post-traumatic bowel syndrome?

Posted by: Groucho | Feb 19 2006 2:26 utc | 29

i love this place! lolololol. on my way to the state whiskey store before it closes.

Posted by: annie | Feb 19 2006 2:45 utc | 30

going further OT here, but that ratchet article’s section on FDR & his steering of the dems away from overt racism toward black america brings to mind something on FDR i read at the end of last year. from richard drinnon’s excellent study, Keeper of Concentration Camps: Dillon S. Myer and American Racism.

Surely no West Coast exclusionists had to convert Roosevelt to racism. Thanks to Christopher Thorne’s extraordinary research for Allies of a Kind: The United States, Britain, and the War Against Japan, 1941-1945 (1978), we know that the president considered it fit to joke to White House aides that Puerto Rico’s “excessive” birthrate could be solved by “the methods which Hitler used effectively”: “It is all very simple and painless – you have people pass through a narrow passage and then there is a brrrrr of an electrical apparatus. They stay there for twenty seconds and from then on they are sterile.” At Yalta he weightily informed Joseph Stalin that the Vietnamese were little pacifists, or, in his own words, “people of small stature … and not warlike.” And to Winston Churchill, whose arrogance toward nonwhites matched his own, he confided that he had “never liked the Burmese and you people must have had a terrible time with them for the last fifty years. Thank the Lord you have He-Saw, We-Saw, You-Saw [i.e., Prime Minister U. Saw] under lock and key. I wish you could put the whole bunch of them into a frying pan with a wall around it and let them stew in their own juice” (Allies, pp. 6, 159).
For the commander in chief the war in the Pacific was at bottom a racial war that had originated in the first place from the inborn nature of the Japanese to be aggressors and as such to be a separate species from the peace-loving white Americans. In the summer of 1942 FDR informed the British Minister Sir Ronald Campbell that he believed crossbreeding with Europeans might improve certain Asian peoples, such as the Chinese, but definately not “the Japanese-European mixture, which was, he agreed, thoroughly bad.” “The President had asked the Professor [Ales Hrdlicka of the Division of Physical Anthropology at the Smithsonian Institution] why the Japanese were as bad as they were, and had followed up by asking about the Hairy Ainus. The Professor had said the skulls of these people were some 2,000 years less developed than ours…The President asked whether this might account for the nefariousness of the Japanese, and had been told that it might, as they might well be the basic stock of the Japanese” (Allies, pp. 158-59,167-68). The president put the professor to work on this proposition, but the latter died in 1943 before all of the evidence was in.

of course, we all know that FDR got his opportunity to “put the whole bunch of them into a frying pan with a wall around it and let them stew in their own juice” to save the “peace-loving species” from the aggressors.

Posted by: b real | Feb 19 2006 2:53 utc | 31

malooga & anna missed
you are treasures, truly

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Feb 19 2006 3:25 utc | 32

@anna missed:
It can’t be all bad when you can laugh at something as horrible as that. You had me screaming with laughter.
@Karl:
Stop lurking and come on in and have a drink. Arlen doesn’t fly in small planes. They got him in the lobster pot too, with a heavy iron chain around his neck. Besides, if he doesn’t behave, they’ll change his chemo recipe.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 19 2006 5:29 utc | 33

Nothing will change until the left ‘unseen’ fist of Adam Smith starts swinging. One of these days the American people will realize that God does not bless America. You can’t keep paying with borrowed money forever. The Neokkkons have been sowing the seeds of economic suicide ever since they took over the US government.

Posted by: pb | Feb 19 2006 6:27 utc | 34

Thanks Uncle, Malooga, annie, anna missed and everyone here (especially b for keeping this site up) for stating how I feel most of the time.
Just a lurker, I try to stay away and try to neutralize my increasingly radical feelings but always end up back here trying to keep a lid on my sanity.

Posted by: terrorist lieberal craigb | Feb 19 2006 9:45 utc | 35

in the mids of life after four decades of resistance – i thought i was prepared for some repose
the contrary beame the truth
i have had to find new breath from within this broken body to fight the enemies – the same enemies as those of my youth
when i was a younger fellow – i misunderstood the great machiavel & thought that even under the most sinister schemes existed an order – a working out of balances. a realpolitik, if you will
but the premier attack on the people of iraq by bush pere & then by bush fils – that no such order exists. that what althusser called appareils in th occident are nothin other than slaughterhouses & whorehouses.
there exists for them who rule from the roll of dollars not only no common sense but also no human sense
& yes it is an idgnity to know the ‘states’ are blessed with criminals whether they are bush, blair or berlusconi – & their pantins, their puppets, their deputy sherrifs in afganistan, pakistan, egypt & australia have only rendered that criminality like some blood drenched comedy
& i see our immediate futures as so dark, so malign – that it is difficult to be anything other than melancholic while accepting melancholy has always been the sister to my rage & fury
gladly, that melancholy has not wiped out the resistancein me & it remains in the midst of life to pick up & accelerate the fight of these stolen decades
everything that happens in america from the constant brutalities, the crude lies & the comedic but authoritarian impulses of this administration – cheney shooting a man in the face for example -almost overwhelm me with their viciousness & their stupidity
they are after all cretins or imbeciles in search of illumination
but the blood they are washing us with is a blood without honour & without meaning. it is blood that is trying to alchemically become oil
yes the mullahs are mad – but the ‘arab street’ is instinctively & rationally reacting to a century of denials, dictatorship, demonisation & ultimately the degredation that finds its metaphor & reality at abu ghraib, basra or gitmo
communities like our own are necessary for us to find breath for the necessary battles, the necessary reflection & the necessary meditations of what lenin simply demanded, ‘what is to be done’

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Feb 19 2006 15:15 utc | 36

A Basic Call to Consciousness
The Hau de no sau nee Address to the Western World
Geneva, Switzerland, Autumn 1977

What is presented here is nothing less audacious than a cosmogony of the Industrialized World presented by the most politically powerful and independent non-Western political body surviving in North America. It is, in a way, the modern world through Pleistocene eyes. ….The Non-governmental Organizations had called for papers which describe the conditions of oppression suffered by Native people under three subject headings, with supportive oral statements to be given to the commissions. The Hau de no sau nee, the traditional Six nations council at Onondaga, sent forth three papers which constitute an abbreviated analysis of Western history, and which call for a consciousness of the Sacred Web of Life in the Universe.”

“Life begins on the other side of despair,” – Sartre

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Feb 19 2006 16:04 utc | 37

With Lenin on our side. LOL!
r’giap, that red Koolaid you’ve been drinking is still Koolaid.

Posted by: gylangirl | Feb 19 2006 22:15 utc | 38

A Joe Baegant postscript to this thread, somebody was channeling our dialogue.
………………
Still, what about those cages in Gitmo? Or global warming? You and I may presently be yammering our asses off in cyberspace (talk about inauthentic!) about such topics, but most Americans, if they dialogue about those things at all, conduct the dialogue with that voices inside our heads, the one that says: Things cannot be as bad as the alarmists say. They cannot be as bad as I often suspect they are. If there really were such a thing as global warming they would be starting to do something about it. And besides, even if it were true, science will find a way to fix it. If there really were genocide going on in so many places far more people would be concerned. At the same time, every commercial and piece of sports hoopla, every celebrity news item leaves us with the impression that, if we have time and money for such things, then matters cannot be all that bad, can they? If the earth were heating up we would surely notice it. If our soldiers and government agencies were torturing people around the world it would make the news. If millions were being exterminated, it would be more obvious, would it not? Look around. Nobody seems worried. Look how normal everything is every day. Look at your wife and your own family. No one is worried. Things cannot be that bad.
Joe Bageant’s little inner voice is like everyone else’s. Whenever I shudder at the condition of the republic, whenever I feel its utter absence of community, it scolds me and tells me I am crazy: Nothing is wrong. This is merely the way things are. It has always been this way. You cannot change that. You expect too much. Look at your wife. She’s not upset. She wonders why you cannot just go ahead and be happy. What you see around you is normalcy. Take care of your own family. Relax. Buy something. And I do too. Which is why I own nine guitars, though I can only play one at a time, and even then not very well. The voice made me do it. I was bored.

Posted by: anna missed | Feb 21 2006 10:30 utc | 39