|
Bomb Rio!
Some Middle East news and one bit from elsewhere:
Riverbend lives through an Iraqi/U.S. early morning raid in Baghdad: The Raid …
One of them stood with the Klashnikov pointed at us, and the other one began opening cabinets and checking behind doors. We were silent. The only sounds came from my aunt, who was praying in a tremulous whisper and little B., who was sucking away at his thumb, eyes wide with fear. I could hear the rest of the troops walking around the house, opening closets, doors and cabinets.
Also in Iraq: British troops videoed ‘beating Iraqis’
The video, lasting just over three minutes, is said to show at least 42 blows rained upon the four teenagers. The cries of the prisoners can be heard clearly according to the newspaper report.
Nearby, the head of the Israeli secret service recognizes an apartheid state and explains who the real terrorists are: Israeli spy chief’s speech caught on camera
The Shin Bet chief told his audience that both Israel’s judicial system and security establishment treated Arabs and Jews differently. When Arabs and Jews are guilty of the same offence he said, they don’t always receive similar treatment during interrogation or in court.
Yuval Diskin then spoke about those he called "Jewish terrorists", men or women who use violence to oppose the pull out of settlers from occupied Palestinian territory.
But why care of the British terrorists in Iraq or the Jewish terrorists in the West Bank when you can create more: US prepares military blitz against Iran’s nuclear sites
"This is more than just the standard military contingency assessment," said a senior Pentagon adviser. "This has taken on much greater urgency in recent months."
There is now even a date set: Russian MP gives date of U.S. Iran attack
Russian Duma member Vladimir Zhirinovsky said that a U.S. attack on Iraq is "inevitable" and will occur on March 28.
But why not bomb Rio? Why not refer Brazil to the U.N.? Why isn´t their anything in the major media about this? Brazil poised to join the world’s nuclear elite
While the world community scrutinizes Iran’s nuclear plans, Latin America’s biggest country is weeks away from taking a controversial step and firing up the region’s first major uranium enrichment plant.
…
Unlike Iran, Brazil is considered a good global citizen that isn’t seeking nuclear weapons, although its military ran a secret program to develop a nuclear weapon as recently as the early 1990s. … Brazilian energy adviser Rogerio Cezar Cerqueira Leite said the
Resende plant will allow Brazil to sell to growing markets for enriched
uranium and fuel a domestic nuclear program that’s bound to expand.
"Without enriched uranium, you don’t have nuclear technology,"
Cerqueira Leite said. "It’s not just national prestige. If you don’t
make it yourself, you will always be behind in the nuclear race."
Bomb Rio! Do it today!
We’re all about to get “taken on a ride”
on that stellar anti-gravity funnel beam,
as long as you don’t mind getting dragged
at a speed-of-light-deficit-drain wherever
Star Wars is going.
More Dead Lab-Coats 1980’s s–t. Bablefish.
Playing the DoD grant morons for suckers.
Here’s Dr. Felber’s lab-coat welfare plan:
“DTRA can realize huge cost savings if
low-cost flux compression can sharpen the
pulses and compress the power curve.” OK…
“Scottie, the flux capacitors are smoking!”
“I’m giving it all I got, en’uh, Captain!”
We are being destroyed by DOD/DHS entitlements.
Corrosion alone, ordinary everyday rust, costs
DOD $30 BILLION a year in lost inventory, more
than the entire Education Budget, gone to dust.
Then these PhD ass-clowns get paid billions
to sit on their Cray-butts, and gyn up sci-fi
grants-in-aid for a Next Generation Scam (NGS).
This guy’s a professional welfare mother-f-r.
– –
During his 30-year career, Dr. Felber has led physics research and development programs for the
Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the
Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the Department of Energy and Department of Transportation,
the National Institute of Justice, National Institutes of Health, and national laboratories.
Dr. Felber is Vice President and
Co-founder of Starmark.
ADVANCED ENGAGEMENT PLANNING FOR
NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTS
STARMARK, INC. (SAN DIEGO, CA)
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
Franklin S. Felber
Starmark, Inc.
P. O. Box 270710
San Diego, CA 92198-2710
Phone: (858) 676-0055
ABSTRACT:
The Phase I objective is to identify and parameterize the engagement tactics that will be most effective
in the nuclear environments of salvage-fuzed and impact-fuzed ballistic missiles. Engagement tactics
to be analyzed will include innovative firing tactics, such as shoot–no-look–shoot with variable laddered-
down salvos, and flyout patterns that minimize redout backgrounds and exploit atmospheric shielding.
Comparisons of engagement tactics with hardening will be done parametrically with respect to ballistic
missile threats and to the operational capabilities, hardness, and inventory of interceptors. Probability of
zero leakage will be the figure of merit. Starmark will use the missile-defense performance and
engagement code, National Missile Defense Operability (NMDO), developed for DTRA by the PI, which
performs engagement analysis, calculates nuclear environments self-consistently with detonation upon
intercept, and calculates the resulting degradation of missile-defense operability and probability of
zero leakage. The Phase II objective will be to delineate the conditions under which the various innovative
and conventional engagement tactics can supplant hardening for current and projected missile defense
architectures and scenarios. We anticipate teaming in a classified Phase II program with an MDA
aerospace/defense contractor.
STARMARK, INC.
P. O. Box 270710
San Diego, CA 92198
Phone:
PI:
Topic#: (858) 676-0055
Franklin S. Felber
DTRA 00-018
Title: Innovative Flux-Compression Approaches for Next Generation Machines
Abstract: Starmark and Maxwell Systems Division have teamed to demonstrate the feasibility of using
flux compression to achieve pulse sharpening and power compression in Next Generation Machines
(NGMs) and to demonstrate that flux compression can be a simple, robust, efficient, and reliable means
of doing so. Using flux compression for pulse sharpening on x-ray simulators promises potential savings
of many tens of millions of dollars on NGMs. The objectives of the Phase I program are: (1) To assess
the feasibility of various flux-compression design configurations for pulse sharpening of x-ray simulators,
including inside-out coaxial sweeping-wave and helical-coil generators, as well as outside-in designs.
(2) To integrate plasma stability analysis into the design evaluation and design optimization processes.
(3) To systematize the process for optimizing flux-compression design parameters and implement the
process to produce a conceptual design of an effective and efficient flux-compression generator and
design options for an NGM. Anticipated products of the program include an assessment and conceptual
designs of the most promising candidates for configurations and design options for flux-compression
generators for NGMs. The Starmark/Maxwell team will work closely with DTRA to ensure that the program
contributes to the major investment decisions that must be made in planning and designing NGMs.
DTRA can realize huge cost savings on future x-ray simulators if flux compression will allow use of
long-rise-time (250 – 500 ns) voltage pulses to achieve short (50 – 100 ns) implosion times of plasma
radiation sources. Opportunities for application of flux-compression technology in the commercial arena
include all high-power pulsed-power applications in which cost savings can be realized by building
microsecond-pulse, moderate-voltage generators and using low-cost flux compression to sharpen the
pulses and compress the power.
Posted by: Clarence Michaels | Feb 12 2006 21:08 utc | 9
Hmm in an odd way we needed that sobering referral back to the horrors of the Imperial model of power structures.
I know that one of the reasons I haven’t had much to say lately is the sort of ennui that comes from looking inwards, combined with the shame of worrying about whether someone’s phones are tapped, when in other parts of the world, that isn’t an issue. In those places when the phones, whose calls are listened by every man and his dog, stop working at 3.00am, even the children know that it means the jackboots are going to come crashing through the door.
Riverbend’s story really got to me. The reason I identified with it was her description of the ordinariness of the actions of the home invaders in a situation that was extra-ordinary for the other actors, reminded me of a similar circumstance when I was young.
I was about seventeen, a student at Uni and was woken up by a kick to my head (I thought it was cool to sleep on a futon a few inches above the floor- heh the last time I did that). Once awake I saw that there were more burly blokes in my room than it seemed could possibly fit. Some were uniformed, most were not but the thing that really caught my attention was the gun pointed at me. This by a bloke who seemed to be in charge and was ordering me out of bed. Even nowadays NZ Police don’t normally carry guns, in fact in those days handguns were virtually unobtainable, and my repulsion was tempered by a young male’s fascination with seeing a real handgun up close for the first time. I had to restrain myself from reaching out grabbing it and saying “Wow can I take a look at that?”
Although I wasn’t well endowed with common-sense in those days I had enough to not grab at the gun.
All of these thoughts must have happened in an instant. I got dressed to the sound of various blokes insinuating that I must be a ‘homo’, this because a classmate who was too tired to drive all the way home the night before had crashed on the couch in the corner of my room.
That poor bloke was copping it big time, although he had picked up on the stunt these invaders were pulling.
That is they were trying to establish ascendency over us through intimidation and humiliation. So he didn’t rise to their taunts.
I had a pretty fair idea why this was happening but my classmate had none and in what I later learned was pretty standard m.o. they ‘authorities’ weren’t telling us why they were there.
A couple of nights ago an act of what would now undoubtedly be termed ‘terrorism’ but which we considered was ‘just making a statement’ had occurred at a foreign owned corporation’s NZ offices (before conclusions are leapt at, it wasn’t a US corporation). Considerable effort had been made to ensure that no people could/would be in the vicinity, something which at the tine appeared sufficient to adolescents who were not that well versed in either consequential thinking or ‘Murphy’s law’.
These two factors would cause any of the participants to dismiss any such action out of hand once they matured a little.
Anyway I was dragged off along with my classmate (talk about wrong place at wrong time stuff), over the somewhat subdued protests of my housemates (It wasn’t just fear which kept them quiet, it subsequently transpired that one of them; a schoolteacher who had been caught smoking ‘pot’ a couple of years before, was working off his ‘debt’ to society by immersing himself in the ‘counter-culture’ and informing on us).
The only reason I bring this up (if I don’t in fact delete this), is that once back on the police and security services territory, we were split up and they moved straight into physical torture right from the get go.
The thing about that which horrified me the most was that they knew exactly what they were doing and had obviously done this stuff many times before.
It was that I most identified with in Riverbend’s tale.
These acts of intimidation and abuse of power are bad enough in themselves, but if you’re young and naive the way this horror appears to be absolutely ordinary, just another day at the office for the torturers, is what horrifies most of all.
I had suffered a depressed fracture to my skull about a year before (caused by apolice baton during a particularly violently resisted attempt to prevent our expression of opposition to Vietnamese people being slaughtered), and at one stage during this question-free ‘interrogation’ I can remember being on the ground while assorted thugs kicked the shit outta me. I was concerned that one of their boots may land in the ‘sweet spot’ ie the part of my skull where the bone had been pulled back up off my brain to mend by re-attaching to the rest of my cranium.
I then did the stupidest thing I had done in a long while. I pointed out to them that perhaps they should avoid that spot lest they have a dead interrogee. Ah the naivety of youth. I had given them a good target to aim for and a couple of the bones in my right hand were shattered by their kicks as I tried to protect my head from their kicks..
Anyway I won’t bore any longer with this tale of woe because however bad the treatment a white kid from the burbs copped from NZ ‘authorities’ all those years ago it would have been nothing in comparison to what could have happened to Riverbend’s uncle had he put a foot wrong during his home invasion.
We can see and hear from the english video of brutes ar work, some blokes really get their rocks off beating the shit out of younger males.
I have my theories on this and guess any of the psychologists could give us even more, although it doesn’t take a great deal of knowledge or skills to adduce this video narrator’s motivation. These sort of acts always have the opposite effect from the one that the authority’s leadership claims they are achieving.
It may be possible to beat someone a little older, who has more than just himself to worry about eg a family, a mortgage, a job; into submission. I’d reckon that trying this on a young wanna-be male is almost always going to have the opposite effect.
For example my classmate who got caught up in all this simply because he was unlucky enough to have been allocated DiD as a project partner, immediately became a committed member of our ship of fools.
We go back to Riverbend’s story which in it’s own way is far more cause for concern than those kids’ hidings. That is foul and evil in itself.
A few things are apparent; firstly that since Negroponte, Baghdad is being ‘tamed’ by the sort of continuous harrassment of the citizenry that is the antithesis of developing the open and democratic state BushCo claims to be seeking.
But the real horror is contained in these lines from Riverbend :
…..”Last time they had raided my aunts area, they took away four men on their street alone. Two of them were students in their early twenties- one a law student, and the other an engineering student, and the third man was a grandfather in his early sixties. There was no accusation, no problem- they were simply ordered outside, loaded up into a white pickup truck and driven away with a group of other men from the area. Their families haven’t heard from them since and they visit the morgue almost daily in anticipation of finding them dead.”…..
…..”We found out a few hours later that one of our neighbors, two houses down, had died. Abu Salih was a man in his seventies and as the Iraqi mercenaries raided his house, he had a heart-attack. His grandson couldn’t get him to the hospital on time because the troops wouldn’t let him leave the house until they’d finished with it. His grandson told us later that day that the Iraqis were checking the houses, but the American troops had the area surrounded and secured. It was a coordinated raid.
They took at least a dozen men from my aunts area alone- their ages between 19 and 40. The street behind us doesn’t have a single house with a male under the age of 50- lawyers, engineers, students, ordinary laborers- all hauled away by the ‘security forces’ of the New Iraq. The only thing they share in common is the fact that they come from Sunni families (with the exception of two who I’m not sure about).”…..
Not only has Riverbend described an act of genocide chillingly familiar to the description of the Srebrenica slaughter, it appears this genocide is being committed with US connivance. No I’m not shocked by US assistance in genocide per se, that has been a permissable act dating back to at least WW2. What concerns and surprises me that given the current contra temps BushCo are trying to crank up with Iran, assisting Shia ascendency in this area must be counterproductive.
It’s a sad indication of the calluses most of us have allowed grow across our empathy, that it requires two incidents as bad as these ones are, to put our thoughts back onto the real victims of Empire.
Posted by: Debs is dead | Feb 12 2006 23:16 utc | 11
I’m not slow to change my mind, sometimes I even do it without noticing, yet I still can’t believe in the attack on Iran.
If one assumes that the main aim is to control ME ressources, then Iran will have to be taken over; partly as Iraq has to be pacified. How to accomplish that? It would costs billions and billions which the US doesn’t have; hundreds of thousands of troops that the US ain’t got, and NATO is not willing to give (yet?) Holding the oil fields (areas) alone won’t work either.
Precision bombing of nuclear sites is in itself a useless and ridiculous thing to do, except as a first salvo to provoke escalation. (The Iranians are not building nuclear bombs.) Then what?
Meanwhile the price of oil flies south (the market), the US discusses a complete embargo on Iran (Halliburton has stopped doing biz there, reluctantly, I read), and Iran thinks about selling less oil! Lunatic!, or rather taunts and threats, agressive posturings, from both sides.
The scenario for Iraq – depose Saddam, set up ‘democracy’ and a puppet Gvmt, maintain a heavy military presence, multiple bases, to ensure control – create a ‘free market’, more liberty for civilians, see to it that living standards rise, revamp education, watch the country ‘take off’ in a frenzy of materialist excitement – in short, create a weird kind of little America while preserving local customs of worship, desert lore, family customs, etc. (not diet!), while unrealistic was nevertheless a possibility, a dream not entirely divorced from reality. Because Iraq was extremely weak on the military end, was partly destroyed already, poor and getting poorer (sanctions), because Saddam was reviled by a large part of the population and was seen as contributing to their misery….it might have been manageable. WW2 ‘liberation’ scripts – remember the hearts and flowers? – played a big mythical role.
Subsequently, it did not work out, though one could qualify it as a semi-success for the moment. Well, not a total failure at any rate. The US miscalculated in various ways, of course, and mismanaged through greed and utter incompetence. The polarisation of the different communities — Sunni, Shia — are not just symptoms of crazed muslim ‘attitudes’ but are an outcome of the whole story. It is a way for the occupied to show – well you have bitten off more than you can chew…
But who could possibly imagine such a plan for Iran? Nobody.
Therefore, the plan to attack Iran is not real, or another one, of a different kind, is operating.
Has Israel benefitted from the Iraq invasion? No. Naturally, its leaders may not care about that….
(–Debs good on Murdoch, thanks, that’s exactly it.)
Posted by: Noisette | Feb 13 2006 17:13 utc | 23
|