Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 12, 2006
Bomb Rio!

Some Middle East news and one bit from elsewhere:

Riverbend lives through an Iraqi/U.S. early morning raid in Baghdad: The Raid …

One of them stood with the Klashnikov pointed at us, and the other one began opening cabinets and checking behind doors. We were silent. The only sounds came from my aunt, who was praying in a tremulous whisper and little B., who was sucking away at his thumb, eyes wide with fear. I could hear the rest of the troops walking around the house, opening closets, doors and cabinets.

Also in Iraq: British troops videoed ‘beating Iraqis’

The video, lasting just over three minutes, is said to show at least 42 blows rained upon the four teenagers. The cries of the prisoners can be heard clearly according to the newspaper report.

Nearby, the head of the Israeli secret service recognizes an apartheid state and explains who the real terrorists are: Israeli spy chief’s speech caught on camera

The Shin Bet chief told his audience that both Israel’s judicial system and security establishment treated Arabs and Jews differently. When Arabs and Jews are guilty of the same offence he said, they don’t always receive similar treatment during interrogation or in court.

Yuval Diskin then spoke about those he called "Jewish terrorists", men or women who use violence to oppose the pull out of settlers from occupied Palestinian territory.

But why care of the British terrorists in Iraq or the Jewish terrorists in the West Bank when you can create more: US prepares military blitz against Iran’s nuclear sites

"This is more than just the standard military contingency assessment," said a senior Pentagon adviser. "This has taken on much greater urgency in recent months."

There is now even a date set: Russian MP gives date of U.S. Iran attack

Russian Duma member Vladimir Zhirinovsky said that a U.S. attack on Iraq is "inevitable" and will occur on March 28.

But why not bomb Rio? Why not refer Brazil to the U.N.? Why isn´t their anything in the major media about this?  Brazil poised to join the world’s nuclear elite

While the world community scrutinizes Iran’s nuclear plans, Latin America’s biggest country is weeks away from taking a controversial step and firing up the region’s first major uranium enrichment plant.

Unlike Iran, Brazil is considered a good global citizen that isn’t seeking nuclear weapons, although its military ran a secret program to develop a nuclear weapon as recently as the early 1990s.

Brazilian energy adviser Rogerio Cezar Cerqueira Leite said the
Resende plant will allow Brazil to sell to growing markets for enriched
uranium and fuel a domestic nuclear program that’s bound to expand.

"Without enriched uranium, you don’t have nuclear technology,"
Cerqueira Leite said. "It’s not just national prestige. If you don’t
make it yourself, you will always be behind in the nuclear race."

Bomb Rio! Do it today!

Comments

Turkish help to attack Iran? Maybe not.
Bad Blood on The Big Screen

The movie high jinks of a Turkish Rambo who single-handedly takes on U.S. forces in lawless northern Iraq are filling cinemas across Turkey, America’s only predominantly Muslim nato ally.

Subtle it ain’t, but Turks are in a frenzy over it. Advance tickets sold out weeks ago; cabinet ministers, businessmen and even the Prime Minister’s wife and daughters packed the glitzy premiere in the capital Ankara.

Posted by: b | Feb 12 2006 15:09 utc | 1

The US has given amazing advance notice to Iran that they plan to attack. The amount of time Iran has had to set up terrorist networks both in Europe and the US is – well, when they were handing out brains the US leaders thought they said trains and asked for a slow one.
While I have been active in opposing nuclear weapons, and find the racists in Teran extremely hard to take, I still find myself feeling sympethic to their attempts to get nuclear weapons.
And I’ve got tickets to Spain for the 29th.

Posted by: ed | Feb 12 2006 15:18 utc | 2

Excellent collection of contradictory articles.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Feb 12 2006 17:18 utc | 3

Zhirinovsky is a bit of a nut (from Wikipedia):
He advocates alliances between the former Soviet republics leading up to re-incorporation of the Soviet Union.(This isn’t nutty, most politicians won’t speak overtly about the conflicts of empire though) Zhirinovsky also made statements regarding re-acquisition of Alaska through the use of military force (populist fantasy), invading and occupying Iran (populist fantasy again–and a disaster worse than Afghanistan in the making, but it begs the question why he is now so concerned over Iran’s fate), and constructing large fans to blow Russia’s nuclear waste into Germany (What do you think, b? They’d have to be some pretty large fans, and I don’t think Poland or France would be too happy about this–how exactly do you get the waste to settle only on Germany? Sounds like you mihgt need Germany’s fabled engineering skills to even attempt it). He has also praised Adolf Hitler’s rule (Phew, I was worried he would praise his mustache) and encouraged the use of nuclear weapons against possible adversaries (Maybe he could grab a post in Bush’s regime). He has been known to make public anti-Semitic remarks.(Unfortunately that’s a Bozo no-no these days)
Zhirinovsky claims that the 2005 civil unrest in France were sparked by the American Central Intelligence Agency in order to “weaken Europe”.(possible, though the French leaders are odious enough to have managed this if they wanted. Let’s not give any credit to social forces.)
In reaction to United States Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s criticism of Russian policy during the winter 2006 gas dispute with Ukraine, Zhirinovsky told Pravda that Rice’s statement was a reflection of her unmarried and childless status. (He is a doctor of philosophy, after all. Maybe he can do for her what Bush doesn’t seem able, even if he is willing.)
Zhirinovsky has not withheld any comments on his opinion on the increasing spread of bird flu in Turkey. According to the January 23, 2006 edition of U.S. News & World Report, Zhirinovsky has “urged men to use rifles to shoot down migratory birds that may carry the virus”. Although the statement may sound odd, this is actually what is being done near the chicken farms in order to prevent the possible spread by air. (If you can shoot them all–maybe they should employ a star wars defense)
Ok, its slow here at the Moon bar so I tried to interject a little humor. What I’m trying to get at is that Zhirinovsky’s comments have more to do with domestic consumption than any real knowledge. I don’t have the link at hand but I read recently that Bush had set an ultimatum for the invasion of Iraq, and even he was 10 days off, and short.
I posted a lot about this on the open thread. I wish I knew what was going to happen. About a week ago Charlie Rose had all the usual suspects discussing this topic on his show. And, to a man, all of them urged caution and made the case that Bush has more to lose than to gain. Ken Pollack, the (ostensibly) dem neo-con, who was so hot for Iraq, was particulary sobering.
So what is to be made of this? Perhaps just that elite factions are much more divided that the previous war. This increases the chances of some splinter faction gumming up the works before they can attack.
There is also the dichotomy between nuking Iran’s atomic energy facilities, and occupying Kuzestan, the province containing 90% of Iran’s oil reserves, which flanks Iraq’s eastern frontier. The former, they could well do but don’t really care about; the later, they wet-dream about but would be hard pressed to pull off. And this in a nutshell, is the crux of the matter. I am reminded of the story of Moses and the burning coals.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 12 2006 17:28 utc | 4

video
of the soldiers beating the youths can be linked from here. the sound effects are chilling

Posted by: annie | Feb 12 2006 17:43 utc | 5

One must wonder why NOTW Murdoch has released this video.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Feb 12 2006 20:09 utc | 6

Sub-Dividing G-d
A propos of G-d, to rustle up the telltales,
even before the winds of war fill our sails.
Of the several high-rank correspondents I’ve
maintained, those in US.gov are saying weird
(for them) things, ‘hold your loved ones near’,
while those from Gulf-to-ASEAN have uniformly
gone radio-silent, every single one of them.
NSA has turned inward against US, espionage
is being sold to the highest bidder, we are
in the end times of a Neo Soviet, and still
1000 days of these lame-duck Pontius Pilates,
rapturing our futures for 12 silver shekels.
Could it implode? Alpha-Tau? ‘The first will
be last, and the last will be first’? Michael
Brown, Michael Chertoff, George Bush, Katrina?
A colossal Tower of Babbel, rising up from an
Iranian Plain of Jars, gone radioactive salt?
“Religion that G-d our Father accepts as pure
and faultless is this: to look after orphans
and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.” James 1:27
Does that sound like this White House Cabal?
Who told you they were True Believers? Them!!
Great Satan rears up laughing on his hind feet.
We are voyagers trapped on the Holy Lost Ark.
L’évolution de notre lutte finale sera pathétique.
http://tinyurl.com/dgmy3

Posted by: Gail Abernathy | Feb 12 2006 20:10 utc | 7

With all the bad news that gets posted here I figured I’s share some REALLY good news to hearten your souls.
The die has been cast and terrorism is out, we are committing to MARS BITCHES!!!
Read all about it. And have some bubbly for me.
http://www.physorg.com/news10789.html
Coming out party is Valentines day.
Turns out LOVE really does rule.
(hat tip slashdot)
http://science.slashdot.org/science/06/02/11/1819208.shtml

Posted by: patience | Feb 12 2006 20:12 utc | 8

We’re all about to get “taken on a ride”
on that stellar anti-gravity funnel beam,
as long as you don’t mind getting dragged
at a speed-of-light-deficit-drain wherever
Star Wars is going.
More Dead Lab-Coats 1980’s s–t. Bablefish.
Playing the DoD grant morons for suckers.
Here’s Dr. Felber’s lab-coat welfare plan:
“DTRA can realize huge cost savings if
low-cost flux compression can sharpen the
pulses and compress the power curve.” OK…
“Scottie, the flux capacitors are smoking!”
“I’m giving it all I got, en’uh, Captain!”
We are being destroyed by DOD/DHS entitlements.
Corrosion alone, ordinary everyday rust, costs
DOD $30 BILLION a year in lost inventory, more
than the entire Education Budget, gone to dust.
Then these PhD ass-clowns get paid billions
to sit on their Cray-butts, and gyn up sci-fi
grants-in-aid for a Next Generation Scam (NGS).
This guy’s a professional welfare mother-f-r.
– –
During his 30-year career, Dr. Felber has led physics research and development programs for the
Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the
Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the Department of Energy and Department of Transportation,
the National Institute of Justice, National Institutes of Health, and national laboratories.
Dr. Felber is Vice President and
Co-founder of Starmark.
ADVANCED ENGAGEMENT PLANNING FOR
NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTS
STARMARK, INC. (SAN DIEGO, CA)
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
Franklin S. Felber
Starmark, Inc.
P. O. Box 270710
San Diego, CA 92198-2710
Phone: (858) 676-0055
ABSTRACT:
The Phase I objective is to identify and parameterize the engagement tactics that will be most effective
in the nuclear environments of salvage-fuzed and impact-fuzed ballistic missiles. Engagement tactics
to be analyzed will include innovative firing tactics, such as shoot–no-look–shoot with variable laddered-
down salvos, and flyout patterns that minimize redout backgrounds and exploit atmospheric shielding.
Comparisons of engagement tactics with hardening will be done parametrically with respect to ballistic
missile threats and to the operational capabilities, hardness, and inventory of interceptors. Probability of
zero leakage will be the figure of merit. Starmark will use the missile-defense performance and
engagement code, National Missile Defense Operability (NMDO), developed for DTRA by the PI, which
performs engagement analysis, calculates nuclear environments self-consistently with detonation upon
intercept, and calculates the resulting degradation of missile-defense operability and probability of
zero leakage. The Phase II objective will be to delineate the conditions under which the various innovative
and conventional engagement tactics can supplant hardening for current and projected missile defense
architectures and scenarios. We anticipate teaming in a classified Phase II program with an MDA
aerospace/defense contractor.
STARMARK, INC.
P. O. Box 270710
San Diego, CA 92198
Phone:
PI:
Topic#: (858) 676-0055
Franklin S. Felber
DTRA 00-018
Title: Innovative Flux-Compression Approaches for Next Generation Machines
Abstract: Starmark and Maxwell Systems Division have teamed to demonstrate the feasibility of using
flux compression to achieve pulse sharpening and power compression in Next Generation Machines
(NGMs) and to demonstrate that flux compression can be a simple, robust, efficient, and reliable means
of doing so. Using flux compression for pulse sharpening on x-ray simulators promises potential savings
of many tens of millions of dollars on NGMs. The objectives of the Phase I program are: (1) To assess
the feasibility of various flux-compression design configurations for pulse sharpening of x-ray simulators,
including inside-out coaxial sweeping-wave and helical-coil generators, as well as outside-in designs.
(2) To integrate plasma stability analysis into the design evaluation and design optimization processes.
(3) To systematize the process for optimizing flux-compression design parameters and implement the
process to produce a conceptual design of an effective and efficient flux-compression generator and
design options for an NGM. Anticipated products of the program include an assessment and conceptual
designs of the most promising candidates for configurations and design options for flux-compression
generators for NGMs. The Starmark/Maxwell team will work closely with DTRA to ensure that the program
contributes to the major investment decisions that must be made in planning and designing NGMs.
DTRA can realize huge cost savings on future x-ray simulators if flux compression will allow use of
long-rise-time (250 – 500 ns) voltage pulses to achieve short (50 – 100 ns) implosion times of plasma
radiation sources. Opportunities for application of flux-compression technology in the commercial arena
include all high-power pulsed-power applications in which cost savings can be realized by building
microsecond-pulse, moderate-voltage generators and using low-cost flux compression to sharpen the
pulses and compress the power.

Posted by: Clarence Michaels | Feb 12 2006 21:08 utc | 9

I’m tired of trying to make sense of what the bush administration has(is) been doing. As b’s post indicates, and is also indicative of virtually every policy they have undertaken and implimented, nothing they’ve done makes a lick of sense.
The only consistancy is inconsistancy. Every policy decision acted on produces a result counter-productive to the stated aim. With most encompassing definitions of power there are patterns, structures, and logic to their construction and a predictable method to their machinations.
Sure, they’re power hungry, but, most -ocracy’s are. And while they also seem to be, comparativly speaaking, off the charts in terms of brutality, I’m not so sure they really are that much worse than other administrations — at least not yet — or until they actually nuke Iran and start WWIII.
So, getting back to my point about how to define or make some sense of this ship of fools, I can only see one clear and consistant thread of (ill)logic that is worth grabbing on to even though it, in the end is not really very usefull. And as it is that sometimes even when you can get a handle on something, that handle in itself is pretty useless in terms of picking it up and doing something with it. So, what I’m trying to get at here is that our present government seems mostly predicated not on any logic, but on its polar opposite or in fact — sheer caprice. Or more adeptly, our government is guided essentially by the whim of the president.
Whatever strikes the presidents fancy at any given moment determines the policy. “We’re doing a great job, no I guess we’re not, but here, I’ll throw a ton of money at it all will be great, no, today I dont feel like it, so forgetaboutit” — and so it goes, on just about every front in domestic and foreign policy.
Which leads me to no other alternative but to declare unequivocally that we must be living in, what can only be described as, the worlds first fully functioning “Infantocracy”. A government that takes its singular guiding inspirational force as being whatever pleases the president at any given moment. All of which would be problematic enough, were it not that this particular pinochle president is especially well suited to the task. Looking back I can think of no other president were by such a condition could or would have been capable of achieving such a critical mass combination — of such a preemminent pinnacle of capriciousness allied at once with un-fathomable ignorance and an itchy finger on the (end of the world) button.
And so the power of infantocracy is fully realized in the fear generated by the perfect embodyment of unpredictability and might combined — exemplified and personified through the worst possible agent, having in effect, been inadvertantly groomed in a neitherworld of detachment, privledge, powerlust, and malice. An agent blinded to humanity. And further isolated by the political consoladation necessary to insulate the power from rebuke. The perfect generator of fear — an equal opportunity fear, at that.

Posted by: anna missed | Feb 12 2006 22:56 utc | 10

Hmm in an odd way we needed that sobering referral back to the horrors of the Imperial model of power structures.
I know that one of the reasons I haven’t had much to say lately is the sort of ennui that comes from looking inwards, combined with the shame of worrying about whether someone’s phones are tapped, when in other parts of the world, that isn’t an issue. In those places when the phones, whose calls are listened by every man and his dog, stop working at 3.00am, even the children know that it means the jackboots are going to come crashing through the door.
Riverbend’s story really got to me. The reason I identified with it was her description of the ordinariness of the actions of the home invaders in a situation that was extra-ordinary for the other actors, reminded me of a similar circumstance when I was young.
I was about seventeen, a student at Uni and was woken up by a kick to my head (I thought it was cool to sleep on a futon a few inches above the floor- heh the last time I did that). Once awake I saw that there were more burly blokes in my room than it seemed could possibly fit. Some were uniformed, most were not but the thing that really caught my attention was the gun pointed at me. This by a bloke who seemed to be in charge and was ordering me out of bed. Even nowadays NZ Police don’t normally carry guns, in fact in those days handguns were virtually unobtainable, and my repulsion was tempered by a young male’s fascination with seeing a real handgun up close for the first time. I had to restrain myself from reaching out grabbing it and saying “Wow can I take a look at that?”
Although I wasn’t well endowed with common-sense in those days I had enough to not grab at the gun.
All of these thoughts must have happened in an instant. I got dressed to the sound of various blokes insinuating that I must be a ‘homo’, this because a classmate who was too tired to drive all the way home the night before had crashed on the couch in the corner of my room.
That poor bloke was copping it big time, although he had picked up on the stunt these invaders were pulling.
That is they were trying to establish ascendency over us through intimidation and humiliation. So he didn’t rise to their taunts.
I had a pretty fair idea why this was happening but my classmate had none and in what I later learned was pretty standard m.o. they ‘authorities’ weren’t telling us why they were there.
A couple of nights ago an act of what would now undoubtedly be termed ‘terrorism’ but which we considered was ‘just making a statement’ had occurred at a foreign owned corporation’s NZ offices (before conclusions are leapt at, it wasn’t a US corporation). Considerable effort had been made to ensure that no people could/would be in the vicinity, something which at the tine appeared sufficient to adolescents who were not that well versed in either consequential thinking or ‘Murphy’s law’.
These two factors would cause any of the participants to dismiss any such action out of hand once they matured a little.
Anyway I was dragged off along with my classmate (talk about wrong place at wrong time stuff), over the somewhat subdued protests of my housemates (It wasn’t just fear which kept them quiet, it subsequently transpired that one of them; a schoolteacher who had been caught smoking ‘pot’ a couple of years before, was working off his ‘debt’ to society by immersing himself in the ‘counter-culture’ and informing on us).
The only reason I bring this up (if I don’t in fact delete this), is that once back on the police and security services territory, we were split up and they moved straight into physical torture right from the get go.
The thing about that which horrified me the most was that they knew exactly what they were doing and had obviously done this stuff many times before.
It was that I most identified with in Riverbend’s tale.
These acts of intimidation and abuse of power are bad enough in themselves, but if you’re young and naive the way this horror appears to be absolutely ordinary, just another day at the office for the torturers, is what horrifies most of all.
I had suffered a depressed fracture to my skull about a year before (caused by apolice baton during a particularly violently resisted attempt to prevent our expression of opposition to Vietnamese people being slaughtered), and at one stage during this question-free ‘interrogation’ I can remember being on the ground while assorted thugs kicked the shit outta me. I was concerned that one of their boots may land in the ‘sweet spot’ ie the part of my skull where the bone had been pulled back up off my brain to mend by re-attaching to the rest of my cranium.
I then did the stupidest thing I had done in a long while. I pointed out to them that perhaps they should avoid that spot lest they have a dead interrogee. Ah the naivety of youth. I had given them a good target to aim for and a couple of the bones in my right hand were shattered by their kicks as I tried to protect my head from their kicks..
Anyway I won’t bore any longer with this tale of woe because however bad the treatment a white kid from the burbs copped from NZ ‘authorities’ all those years ago it would have been nothing in comparison to what could have happened to Riverbend’s uncle had he put a foot wrong during his home invasion.
We can see and hear from the english video of brutes ar work, some blokes really get their rocks off beating the shit out of younger males.
I have my theories on this and guess any of the psychologists could give us even more, although it doesn’t take a great deal of knowledge or skills to adduce this video narrator’s motivation. These sort of acts always have the opposite effect from the one that the authority’s leadership claims they are achieving.
It may be possible to beat someone a little older, who has more than just himself to worry about eg a family, a mortgage, a job; into submission. I’d reckon that trying this on a young wanna-be male is almost always going to have the opposite effect.
For example my classmate who got caught up in all this simply because he was unlucky enough to have been allocated DiD as a project partner, immediately became a committed member of our ship of fools.
We go back to Riverbend’s story which in it’s own way is far more cause for concern than those kids’ hidings. That is foul and evil in itself.
A few things are apparent; firstly that since Negroponte, Baghdad is being ‘tamed’ by the sort of continuous harrassment of the citizenry that is the antithesis of developing the open and democratic state BushCo claims to be seeking.
But the real horror is contained in these lines from Riverbend :

…..”Last time they had raided my aunts area, they took away four men on their street alone. Two of them were students in their early twenties- one a law student, and the other an engineering student, and the third man was a grandfather in his early sixties. There was no accusation, no problem- they were simply ordered outside, loaded up into a white pickup truck and driven away with a group of other men from the area. Their families haven’t heard from them since and they visit the morgue almost daily in anticipation of finding them dead.”…..
…..”We found out a few hours later that one of our neighbors, two houses down, had died. Abu Salih was a man in his seventies and as the Iraqi mercenaries raided his house, he had a heart-attack. His grandson couldn’t get him to the hospital on time because the troops wouldn’t let him leave the house until they’d finished with it. His grandson told us later that day that the Iraqis were checking the houses, but the American troops had the area surrounded and secured. It was a coordinated raid.
They took at least a dozen men from my aunts area alone- their ages between 19 and 40. The street behind us doesn’t have a single house with a male under the age of 50- lawyers, engineers, students, ordinary laborers- all hauled away by the ‘security forces’ of the New Iraq. The only thing they share in common is the fact that they come from Sunni families (with the exception of two who I’m not sure about).”…..

Not only has Riverbend described an act of genocide chillingly familiar to the description of the Srebrenica slaughter, it appears this genocide is being committed with US connivance. No I’m not shocked by US assistance in genocide per se, that has been a permissable act dating back to at least WW2. What concerns and surprises me that given the current contra temps BushCo are trying to crank up with Iran, assisting Shia ascendency in this area must be counterproductive.
It’s a sad indication of the calluses most of us have allowed grow across our empathy, that it requires two incidents as bad as these ones are, to put our thoughts back onto the real victims of Empire.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Feb 12 2006 23:16 utc | 11

Unnh! Did you read the article? The fast moving object REPELS objects lying in its direction of motion. This resembles friction: It will slow it down.
Want to catch a ride on a fast moving object? There just aren’t many things of macroscopic size to give you a push. Why not make some? Yeah, why not burn oil to manufacture coal?
As science, this has the sound of a major theoretical breakthrough. Really. Just don’t swallow the Buck Rogers stuff!

Posted by: Gaianne | Feb 13 2006 0:59 utc | 12

Refering to the “MARS BITCHES” link, of course.

Posted by: Gaianne | Feb 13 2006 1:03 utc | 13

it’s probably for some futuristic weapon

Posted by: annie | Feb 13 2006 1:19 utc | 14

“The Long War”
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0212-01.htm
How to make enemies and succeed in the business of arms manufacture….first you gotta sell the product to the peeple.

Posted by: catlady | Feb 13 2006 2:32 utc | 15

@annie:

Possibly, but I’d rather wait and see what the verdict is from some qualified physicists first. One thing to remember is that if anyone ever does come up with a way to make interstallar travel genuinely practical (as opposed to a big old waste of resources), it would potentially spell an end to competition for resources. Any raw material you want, from burnable hydrogen to fresh water, can be found Out There somewhere, often floating around in gas clouds and meteors which are guaranteed not to disturb any planets. And, of course, you could also set up a few power stations somewhere relatively close to a star, converting water back to hydrogen via solar power — voila, clean and practical energy.

I’m still skeptical, but even so, if the guy is right the futurists might, for the first time ever, actually be right.

Posted by: The Truth Gets Vicious When You Corner It | Feb 13 2006 3:49 utc | 16

Cloned poster said:
One must wonder why NOTW Murdoch has released this video.
I reckon Murdoch’s doing his well reknowned climbing off the bandwagon trick. This is the moment every politician lives in dread of. Murdoch’s immense power stems from the fact that the hand that giveth doth taketh away. The Sun’s desertion of Margaret Thatcher would be about the most radical of these.
There won’t be anything philosophical in it, just economic, Murdoch never been a fool and only a fool would think there’s a dollar in firing nukes off.
It could also be NOTW is more intent on undermining Bliar than any issue over Iran.
It seems that Rupe may have found a Tory leader he can work with in David Cameron and so Bliar may be superfluous to current requirements.
Murdoch is a pragmatist, in addition to being prepared to share Murdoch’s world view and being compliant enough to do what he/she is told, to cop the Murdoch good politiking seal of approval, a politician must be a winner.
If so this is the clearest sign yet Bliar is dead in the water.
Murdoch is a study in contradictions. He never shows any loyalty to politicians, he regards them contemptuously but he can be big on personal/corporate loyalty. There was a drunken old leftie journo who had known Murdoch since the Adelaide Advertiser days when Rupe’s dad Keith Murdoch was in charge of the operation; and his son was being indoctrinated as company man.
Jim and Rupert would never have politically seen eye to eye on anything, yet Murdoch gave Jim the editorship of one of his papers and suffered his drunken follies, compounded with lefty attacks on the Tory state government. It was reckoned even when Murdoch had made News Ltd multinational he still read the front page of each and every fishwrap daily.
Same with the Reuters thing. Reuters haven’t been on message about the Iraqi invasion yet. As far as anyone can tell they weren’t pulled into line.
Reuters lost two journalists early on in the piece when Baghdad’s Palestine Hotel was ‘accidentally’ shelled by US forces, which may well be why Murdoch allowed the newswire to run it’s anti-invasion stories. If so it makes for good company politics within his entire organisation.
Lest anyone imagine this post may be an apprecition of anything Murdoch stands for let me disabuse you.
The point is that, just as many a control freak before him has, Murdoch is fickle and probably considers himself some sort of honorable eccentric deep down.
All that tells us is that like other meglamaniacs there is no limit to Rupert Murdoch’s self delusion.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Feb 13 2006 5:39 utc | 17

@debs:
Interesting take on Murdoch. My knowledge of him begins with his purchase of the Village Voice and then his purchase of various other regional papers where friends of mine worked. Since he never knew anyone over here, his mitigating loyalty never arose. Pity.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 13 2006 6:06 utc | 18

@ The “Truth”…
I’d rather wait and see what the verdict is from some qualified physicists first. One thing to remember is that if anyone ever does come up with a way to make interstallar travel genuinely practical (as opposed to a big old waste of resources), it would potentially spell an end to competition for resources.
Why don’t you just wait and tell us, we’ll all be on tenterhooks until we here from you. Even you concede that ” if the guy is right the futurists might, for the first time ever, actually be right.” Since it would be, by your own admission, for the first time ever, how much hope do you think we should place in this ‘Eldorado’?
By the author’s own admission “His rigorously tested and truly unique thinking has taken us a huge step forward in making near-speed-of-light space travel safe, possible, and much less costly.” How is it rigorously tested; where are the chimps to interview on NPR? Also this minor disclaimer: “In the ‘antigravity beam’ of a speeding star, a payload would draw its energy from the antigravity force of the much more massive star. In effect, the payload would be hitching a ride on a star. Good, lets all wait till a speeding star streaks by and we’ll stick out our thumbs and hitch a ride.
Even if this chimera were somehow true, how would we be able to get our raw materials from outer space except by millions of interstellar ‘trucks’ ferrying back and forth polluting our atmosphere with each exit and reentry. And how will this solve the increasingly perilous problem of orbital junk surrounding our planet and putting any launch into peril? Will any of this solve global warming?
I guess what I’m trying to say is that this is such tripe as to be not worth a sentient thought. Cordially….

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 13 2006 6:34 utc | 19

@debs:
I found your personal story is quite moving, and its tie-in with Riverbend, and my country’s atrocities, quite sad. Thanks for having the courage to share that, much as annie shared her personal story a week ago.
I think many of us have to face this dilemma: how far to go with our activism, and what risks it might entail. I find myself torn between the middle-class life I was raised to expect, and the burning fire to stand up for my principles.
P.S. My mattress is still on the ground. When my last girlfriend saw it, she reacted with greater horror than if I had some sort of rare std. I’m just used to it, I’ve always slept that way.

Posted by: Malooga | Feb 13 2006 6:42 utc | 20

I’ve recently come to the conclusion that Dick Cheney must be reenacting his mental and emotional life as a child of the 1950s, as are the other stringpullers at large.
Because they certainly seem to be dragging us back to that time, that mindset. The air is full of the same cold war style; the FBI cop shows, the simplifying, the gee-whiz gadgets of the future.
Even mentioning the n word scares the crap out of me these days — it’s no longer just a phrase. I was reminded about some sci-fi story I read long ago about a child with six fingers, a mutation due to some terrible nuclear event I assume. Both common themes in SF back in the day, life after a nuclear holocaust and mutation.
The current event might be DU, agent orange, chernobyl or bhopal. I guess years back it was thalidomide … anyway,
Thanks guys I always wanted to live in the future.

Posted by: jonku | Feb 13 2006 7:07 utc | 21

how will this solve the increasingly perilous problem of orbital junk surrounding our planet and putting any launch into peril?
potentially making the alaskan oil spill seem like spilt milk
very entertaining p.s. thanks for the info

Posted by: annie | Feb 13 2006 7:50 utc | 22

I’m not slow to change my mind, sometimes I even do it without noticing, yet I still can’t believe in the attack on Iran.
If one assumes that the main aim is to control ME ressources, then Iran will have to be taken over; partly as Iraq has to be pacified. How to accomplish that? It would costs billions and billions which the US doesn’t have; hundreds of thousands of troops that the US ain’t got, and NATO is not willing to give (yet?) Holding the oil fields (areas) alone won’t work either.
Precision bombing of nuclear sites is in itself a useless and ridiculous thing to do, except as a first salvo to provoke escalation. (The Iranians are not building nuclear bombs.) Then what?
Meanwhile the price of oil flies south (the market), the US discusses a complete embargo on Iran (Halliburton has stopped doing biz there, reluctantly, I read), and Iran thinks about selling less oil! Lunatic!, or rather taunts and threats, agressive posturings, from both sides.
The scenario for Iraq – depose Saddam, set up ‘democracy’ and a puppet Gvmt, maintain a heavy military presence, multiple bases, to ensure control – create a ‘free market’, more liberty for civilians, see to it that living standards rise, revamp education, watch the country ‘take off’ in a frenzy of materialist excitement – in short, create a weird kind of little America while preserving local customs of worship, desert lore, family customs, etc. (not diet!), while unrealistic was nevertheless a possibility, a dream not entirely divorced from reality. Because Iraq was extremely weak on the military end, was partly destroyed already, poor and getting poorer (sanctions), because Saddam was reviled by a large part of the population and was seen as contributing to their misery….it might have been manageable. WW2 ‘liberation’ scripts – remember the hearts and flowers? – played a big mythical role.
Subsequently, it did not work out, though one could qualify it as a semi-success for the moment. Well, not a total failure at any rate. The US miscalculated in various ways, of course, and mismanaged through greed and utter incompetence. The polarisation of the different communities — Sunni, Shia — are not just symptoms of crazed muslim ‘attitudes’ but are an outcome of the whole story. It is a way for the occupied to show – well you have bitten off more than you can chew…
But who could possibly imagine such a plan for Iran? Nobody.
Therefore, the plan to attack Iran is not real, or another one, of a different kind, is operating.
Has Israel benefitted from the Iraq invasion? No. Naturally, its leaders may not care about that….
(–Debs good on Murdoch, thanks, that’s exactly it.)

Posted by: Noisette | Feb 13 2006 17:13 utc | 23

Therefore, the plan to attack Iran is not real, or another one, of a different kind, is operating
different than nuclear? with a nuclear attack you don’t have the same responsibility in controling the masses. because they’re dead. or ‘conformed’. maybe they don’t have a plan for the day after and this is another fly by the seat of our pants operation. perhaps it’s our way of ‘getting our foot in the door’ (in iran) . i know it sounds absurd but even if it is percieved as a failed mission by the populace here we will still have the obligation of ‘fixing it’, thereby justifying our continued presents.perhaps checney &co is just focused on the ‘you break it’ end of the deal, knowing full well even if they get bumped out of power(looking less likely all the time)whoever takes over the helm will have their work cut out for them. i keep thinking of the war board game my bother used to play. simplify. the pain and suffering takes place on the ground. the people planning the madness are working in symbols and concepts. concepts require less ‘reality’. you are correct in saying the plan to attack Iran is not real
but unfortunately , it’s the new reality.
i haven’t even had my coffee. does that make any sense?

Posted by: annie | Feb 13 2006 17:54 utc | 24

The scenario for Iraq – …
is nothing like the plans I have read about recently for Iran. There is no intention to occupy. Massive bombing against military targets – as well as key infrastructure and the occupation of Iran’s oil and gas fields. The Iranian army is severly damaged and the regime is cut off from its own oil. Here is one account of how it could happen.
There is no doubt that disaster will ensue. However, disaster has always worked quite nicely for the Cheney Admin. In the wake of an attack on Iran, Cheney et. al. would be in a good position to ram through their complete agenda – which could include cancelling elections, detention centers, etc.,

Posted by: tgs | Feb 13 2006 19:22 utc | 25

Valerie Plame Leak Sabotaged America’s Iran-Watching Intelligence Effort
an exciting report

An important and provocative report has just been published that suggests that Iran was the target of much of Valerie Plame’s covert investigative work and that outing her identity had far worse consequences than has thus far been acknowledged.
This information also dovetails with information TWN has been digging up on Iran’s interests in Niger uranium.
Raw Story has just published this piece by Larisa Alexandrovna.
The core of the article is:
The unmasking of covert CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson by White House officials in 2003 caused significant damage to U.S. national security and its ability to counter nuclear proliferation abroad, RAW STORY has learned.
According to current and former intelligence officials, Plame Wilson, who worked on the clandestine side of the CIA in the Directorate of Operations as a non-official cover (NOC) officer, was part of an operation tracking distribution and acquisition of weapons of mass destruction technology to and from Iran.
Speaking under strict confidentiality, intelligence officials revealed heretofore unreported elements of Plame’s work. Their accounts suggest that Plame’s outing was more serious than has previously been reported and carries grave implications for U.S. national security and its ability to monitor Iran’s burgeoning nuclear program.
While many have speculated that Plame was involved in monitoring the nuclear proliferation black market, specifically the proliferation activities of Pakistan’s nuclear “father,” A.Q. Khan, intelligence sources say that her team provided only minimal support in that area, focusing almost entirely

Posted by: annie | Feb 13 2006 19:29 utc | 26

@Malooga:

What, did a gang of masked astrophysicists kill your parents while holding up a gas station or something? You really seem hostile!

That aside, I consulted a friend of mine who has a degree in physics and is working on a PhD thesis in mathematics. The initial reaction was “I wasn’t aware this problem was still open,” which would have been enough to make me decide that this probably won’t lead anywhere, but was then followed by “and I just did a seminar in general relativity a couple months back.” It is, of course, possible that my friend is just woefully underinformed, but if this problem isn’t even “big” enough to be mentioned in a graduate-level seminar on the subject, then it probably doesn’t mean much. So it looks like the futurists and the Republican party will continue to be tied for “fewest correct predicitons” for

Posted by: The Truth Gets Vicious When You Corner It | Feb 14 2006 8:01 utc | 27

I was looking on Wikipedia just now, and looked up Neoconservatism to make sure I’m using the term correctly. I am, but that linked me to the Bush doctrine, of which I will quote a bit now:
“The right of self-defense should be extended in order to authorize pre-emptive attacks against potential aggressors cutting them off before they are able to launch strikes against the US.”
Doesn’t this mean that about half the world should be setting itself up to invade the United States EVEN AS WE SPEAK?

Posted by: Keith | Feb 15 2006 10:58 utc | 28

@Keith
You might have come in a bit late if you are just learning about the Neocons (I bookmarked my Billmon neocon introduction here) – but anyway – you certainly have not been slow if figuring out the inanity of this “pre-emptive” philosophy.
Also, as has been pointed out around here, making war preparations is illegal according to the Geneva Convention (as if that mattered).
Of course the point you make probably hasn’t been lost on (say) the Chinese . .. long ways down the track, but at this rate it’s bound to happen someday … (might quench the Empire thing a bit)

Posted by: DM | Feb 15 2006 14:24 utc | 29

Unfortunately (wow, I’m calling a fact that makes an invasion of the United States more improbable unfortunate), China is in the midst of a major cultural revolution that is likely to keep it from rising to the point of challenging American dominance for quite some time. America really does need a serious threat… the Soviets kept the US contained as much as the Americans kept them contained, and with them gone the US has been free to do as it pleases since.

Posted by: Keith | Feb 15 2006 17:22 utc | 30

When Brazil’s leaders start threatening to “wipe Argentina off the map”, then it is time to consider bombing Rio.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Feb 16 2006 11:33 utc | 31

que?

Posted by: DM | Feb 16 2006 12:08 utc | 32