Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 3, 2006
Pain Medication

NYT reporter Risen’s new book will be interesting. Some early nuggets are to be found in this AP piece and in Time.

 

(T)he book said a CIA officer mistakenly sent one of its Iranian agents information that could be used to identify virtually every spy the agency had in Iran. The book said the Iranian was a double agent who turned over the data to Iranian security officials.

Is that the background of the "Chalabi gives information to Iranians" story?

Maybe, but the more important stuff is the NSA spying and there are some interesting details.

First not from the book but from Slate this:

A former telecom executive told us that efforts to obtain call details go back to early 2001, predating the 9/11 attacks and the president’s now celebrated secret executive order. The source, who asked not to be identified so as not to out his former company, reports that the NSA approached U.S. carriers and asked for their cooperation in a "data-mining" operation, which might eventually cull "millions" of individual calls and e-mails.

So the spying did not start with 9/11, but earlier, without presidential war power or other legal bullshit. Who initiated this and why?

Risen does not yet answer that question, but according to Time:

Risen writes that with the White House’s anything-goes mandate in place, everything went. While the NSA began monitoring communications of some Americans suspected of links to al-Qaeda–snooping on "millions of telephone calls and e-mail messages on American soil" …

From a censored letter from house minority leader Pelosi to the NSA’s Hayden this:

You indicated that you were treating as a matter of first impression, [redacted] being of foreign intelligence interest. As a result, you were forwarding the intercepts, and any information [redacted] without first receiving a request for that identifying information to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The NSA started snooping on people in the U.S. before 9/11. They snooped on "millions of calls and e-mails". They are forwarding (yes, it is ongoing) their catches (Can you imagine their criteria for forwarding? Remember – it started prior to 9/11!) to the FBI and who knows to whom else.

Are you still feeling save?

Note the morals of the man behind all of this:

Bush summoned CIA director George Tenet to the White House to ask what intelligence Abu Zubaydah had provided his captors. According to Risen’s source, Tenet told Bush that Abu Zubaydah, badly wounded during his capture, was too groggy from painkillers to talk coherently. In response, Bush asked, "Who authorized putting him on pain medication?"

Comments

Excellent b! Just excellent.
More and more Bush reminds me of Captain Tupolev in “The Hunt for Red October.” We were terrorized into this war.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 3 2006 22:12 utc | 1

The FBI’s domestic surveilance operation – not related to the data mining b discusses – investigates a potential terrorist stripper.

She says she has never been arrested, and her FBI file confirms that. The file, which CL obtained from the ACLU, is five pages long, but three pages were withheld. It reads like a rap sheet with no raps. Chase’s age, Social Security number, and history of participation in various human rights groups is detailed.
….
After questioning her for 20 minutes about her personal life, Chase says the agents finally told her that somebody had informed them she was planning a trip to Iraq. They said they were concerned she might be a domestic terrorist.
Chase isn’t alone. In July 2003, Marc Schultz, who was an Atlanta bookstore employee at the time, wrote a first-person account published in this newspaper about being questioned by the FBI after somebody reported him for reading an article titled “Weapons of Mass Stupidity” in a Caribou coffee shop. Since Sept. 11, 2001, local human rights groups such as Atlanta WAND, the Georgia Peace & Justice Coalition, and School of the Americas Watch have complained about increased monitoring. And earlier this month, President Bush confirmed that in 2002 he authorized the National Security Agency to conduct wiretaps without first acquiring a warrant.
Though Chase’s case differs from the NSA monitoring in that it was another agency watching her, and one that apparently did not use a wiretap, her experience speaks to the intensity – some say wastefulness – of the government’s homeland security initiatives.

Posted by: lonesomeG | Jan 3 2006 22:36 utc | 2

Todays democracy Now is of interest I promise:
National Security Agency Whistleblower Warns Domestic Spying Program Is Sign the U.S. is Decaying Into a “Police State”
Former NSA intelligence agent Russell Tice condemns reports that the Agency has been engaged in eavesdropping on U.S. citizens without court warrants. Tice has volunteered to testify before Congress about illegal black ops programs at the NSA. Tice said, “The freedom of the American people cannot be protected when our constitutional liberties are ignored and our nation has decayed into a police state.” [includes rush transcript], but it must be heard and seen.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 4 2006 0:06 utc | 3

The man is a sadist. Hurting people is his primary source of pleasure–call it, if you will, his current “drug of choice”–and since, by all accounts, his life is chiefly devoted to the pursuit of pleasure, it follows that he would spend most of his time either hurting people, or ordering others to do so, or fantasizing about it, or reading documents about it, or watching taped episodes in which it occurs. I truly believe that historians, in the fullness of time, will produce ample evidence documenting the fact that Bush himself not only orders, but follows with close, obsessive attention, the goings-on in places like Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib. It’s all quite understandable, finally, because, as President, this is the closest he can come to engineering and tracking the execution of individuals on death row–a source of gratification that he exercised on 150 separate occasions during his term as the governor of Texas.

Posted by: alabama | Jan 4 2006 1:23 utc | 4

Cryptome.org has posted a lengthy (and juicy) exerpt from Risen’s book. Here’s an exerpt of the exerpt:

The Bush administration has swept aside nearly thirty years of rules and regulations and has secretly brought the NSA back into the business of domestic espionage. The NSA is now eavesdropping on as many as five hundred people in the United States at any given time and it potentially has access to the phone calls and e-mails of millions more. It does this without court-approved search warrants and with little independent oversight.
President Bush has secretly authorized the NSA to monitor and eavesdrop on large volumes of telephone calls, e-mail messages, and other Internet traffic inside the United States to search for potential evidence of terrorist activity, without search warrants or any new laws that would permit such domestic intelligence collection. Under a secret presidential order signed in early 2002, only months after the September 11 attacks, President Bush has given the NSA the ability to conduct surveillance on communications inside the United States. The secret decision by the president has opened up America’s domestic telecommunications network to the NSA in unprecedented and deeply troubling new ways, and represents a radical shift in the accepted policies and practices of the modern U.S. intelligence community.
The NSA is now tapping into the heart of the nation’s telephone network through direct access to key telecommunications switches that carry many of America’s daily phone calls and e-mail messages. Several government officials who know about the NSA operation have come forward to talk about it because they are deeply troubled by it, and they believe that by keeping silent they would become complicit in it. They strongly believe that the president’s secret order is in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches, and some of them believe that an investigation should be launched into the way the Bush administration has turned the intelligence community’s most powerful tools against the American people.
One government lawyer who is aware of the NSA domestic surveillance operation told reporter Eric Lichtblau that the very few people at the Justice Department who are aware of its existence simply refer to it as “the Program.” It may be the largest domestic spying operation since the 1960s, larger than anything conducted by the FBI or CIA inside the United States since the Vietnam War.
In order to overturn the system established by FISA in 1978, and bring the NSA back into domestic wiretaps without court approval, . administration lawyers have issued a series of secret legal opinions, similar to those written in support of the harsh interrogation tactics used on detainees captured in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Bush administration legal opinions that supported the use of harsh interrogation techniques on al Qaeda detainees have, of course, proven controversial, drawing complaints from allies, objections from civil liberties advocates, and court challenges. The administration faced its first serious legal rebuke in June 2004 when the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the administration’s effort to hold “enemy combatants” without a hearing. The court warned that “a state of war is not a blank check for the president.”

Posted by: Michael Hawkins | Jan 4 2006 1:38 utc | 5

The big questions is who sees this data and what is it used for? Paul Craig Roberts at Counterpunch yesterday asked the question in an article. He suggested as many are now, that Bushie is mining for political dirt and even could go as far as blackmailing dems.
This is some scary assed shit. I believe our country is really on the edge. We are at the tipping point between democracy and dictatorship.

Posted by: jdp | Jan 4 2006 3:32 utc | 6

For anyone who reads this: Today’s Democracy Now (1/03) is destined to be one of the five best of the year. If you have time, please, please listen to it.
Thank you MH and Lg.

Posted by: Malooga | Jan 4 2006 3:43 utc | 7

Yes, the Democracy now is good.
I suppose they spy on the ‘enemies’ of America – meaning on the enemies of the Bush Band, the military industrial complex. They will be digging up secrets, following events that are not under their contol, and doing industrial-type espionage. The information gathered is used to enhance power through the mechanisms I leave to the reader’s imagination, besides the fact that being more informed than your opponents is always positive. So it is impossible to know how the information is used. A huge amount of it will of course be utterly worthless. Occasionally, some busy bee is caught spying on an ordinary American (peace activist, vegan, book reader, etc.) and this hits the news. None of it has anything to do with terrorism.

Posted by: Noisette | Jan 4 2006 14:50 utc | 8

Until recently, the NSA was, despite its size and scope of operations, a fairly obscure organization, and certainly not part of the mass consciousness. That’s the way they wanted it: to them any publicity was bad publicity.
Now they are a major news item and everybody knows what they are, what they are mandated to do – and what they are actually doing. Bush has caused irreparable damage to their operations. I don’t know whether to cheer or jeer.

Posted by: ralphieboy | Jan 4 2006 16:54 utc | 9

Some security snippets:
The GK-1 voice analyzer, developed in Israel by Nemesysco and recently tested in Moscow’s Domodyedevo airport, has proven effective and may soon be sold to airports across the world for $10,000 to $30,000.
Counterthink
Avoiding eye contact with authorities is the kind of behavior that could indicate someone may be planning a terrorist attack, says Maccario, a Transportation Security Administration (TSA) program analyst at Boston’s Logan International Airport. “The fear of discovery changes people’s behavior and body language,” he says.
USA today
Unprecedented authority may soon wind up in the hands of police: departments nationwide would gain the prerogative to arrest people for immigration violations, whether they want it or not.
New Standard
An what is the Dpt. of Homeland Security doing?
The Fort Lauderdale area stands to control millions of dollars of Homeland Security funding as a newly designated region in the nation’s defense against terrorism, natural disasters or health crises.
Homeland Security officials on Tuesday broke out the “Fort Lauderdale Area” from the previously created “Miami Area” to join a network of 35 regions across the country that are eligible for anti-terrorism money.

Sun Sentinel

Posted by: Noisette | Jan 4 2006 17:22 utc | 10

Sorry if this is already somewhere down thread…still going wifi around town, btw…and get a full month of my service nonproviders service for free for my trouble (they never put in my order till yesterday, after three calls AND after THEY called me cause I sent a nice email about how I was cursing them to everyone I know…
ANYWAY…
EMILY MILLER is the Republican Monica who will finally bring down the talibornagains! (and those who love to use their influence.)
from Raw Story
Scanlon was implicated in the Abramoff scandal by his former thirtysomething fiancee, Emily J. Miller, whom he met in the late 1990s while working as communications director for former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX), three former associates who worked with Scanlon at DeLay’s office said.
Media Matters has that old transcript of Ms Miller trying to cut off the Meet the Press interview with Colin Powell…remember that one?
ALSO, she has ties to the Republicans who were flown in to protest in Dade County…which was caught on tape, of course, when they kicked and punched some of the vote counters.
We know Ken Lay flew in some of those on his jet…maybe Abrahmson did too, since DeLay’s office coordinated that attack. SO, wouldn’t it be GREAT to be able to rescue that little moment of fascist attack doggie style Republican politics?
Let the American people hear testimony about the staged demonstration by repukes to disrupt the presidential election??? Hear testimony about the vote count so that Americans could know who won based upon the votes available?
Wouldn’t that judicial coup d’etat be interesting fodder to explore the depths of DeLay’s corruption, and Abramoff and Scalon’s (and Lay’s, and more…) tactical use of their resources to influence elections in the U.S.
Vote tampering…is there a statute of limitations on that one?
with B’s post above, shouldn’t ppl also look into how long Daddy Bush’s intel buddies were snooping on candidates? Maybe all the way back to Gore 2000?
Sorry to pick at this long gone 2000 election, but it’s the sore that needs to be exposed to get to all the maggots and get rid of them.
btw, I did listen to Democracy Now! in the car yesterday and the guy, like so many others in this country, esp. conservatives, has a hard time saying that Bush’s tactics meet the definition of a police state…but he says that the Bush tactics ARE exactly that. The guy voted for Bush twice, gave money to his campaign…so any wingers who want to STILL try to say outrage at Bush is some sort of unreasonable hatred need to get a clue. It wasn’t Mr. Mustard in the ballroom. It was that guy, Paul Craig Roberts, Richard Lugar, John McCain, Wilkerson (as Powell mouthpiece), Richard Clarke, the ambassadors who resigned, the generals who were fired for telling the truth…
and an Independent UK article yesterday says the US will be out of Iraq this year…just in time for midterm elections here, I suppose. Good for the US, since the troops apparently no longer support the junta.
weee heeee! I hope, I hope, I hope we get the full monty going on cspan soon!

Posted by: fauxreal | Jan 4 2006 19:39 utc | 11

thanks fauxreal, i was salivating while reading the emily story on raw story last night, tempted to link worried about seeming gossipy. boy, i sure wouldn’t want to get on emily’s bad side. did you read the quote of her chewing out some post reporter for not sticking to the talking points while covering delay? she’s a true villan lucky for us.
while we may be ‘out’ of iraq this year, our air campaign will intensify making it worse on the ground for the iraqi’s so where’s the bonus?
also , i was enjoying raw stories best of 2005 link w/this ohio ballot fiasco story at the top of the list

Posted by: annie | Jan 4 2006 20:12 utc | 12

My guess is that if the Iraqi oil privitization scheme currently being negotiated — the Production Sharing Agreements — are not reached, favorable to US/UK interests — the US/UK will drop Iraq like a hot potato, by the end of this year. And then — and only then, will Iran be punished with a strike against nuclear facilities.

Posted by: anna missed | Jan 4 2006 20:23 utc | 13

Re: “Production Sharing Agreements” and US/UK interests in Iraq — see links in previous post, here.

Posted by: manonfyre | Jan 4 2006 20:42 utc | 14

annie- since my internet access is so sporadic right now (not only is my modem broken, my usual access elsewhere is not totally available because it’s still winter break) I didn’t know if I missed someone else’s posting.
I read the comments and really didn’t like the way the woman was trashed based upon anything other than her actions…and boy, she sure does have a nice, traceable trail of nastiness, huh?
I would LOVE to have been someone she tried to trash …now, after the fact, because I can think up all sorts of verbal bitch slaps. of couse, at the time, I would have been so angry I would have been all flustered and shakey-handed and my vooooice would have trembled…or maybe not. I have my good days and bad days, as far as intimidation goes.
as far as the air attacks– until we get out, Iraq will have a slow-mo civil war, I suppose, as opposed to a real time one…which was the prediction of most the people familiar with the region that I read before the invasion anyway.
that seems to be the military view now, too, (civil war, not whether or not it will be slo-mo or not…they have to remain optimistic, in spite of all evidence, it seems, according to today’s
At Tuesday’s farewell ceremony on the Campbell Barracks parade field, [General Sanchez said’] “A daunting task lies ahead, but I have no doubt you are well-trained,” said Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, V Corps commander since 2003, who spent a tumultuous year in Iraq. He told the soldiers that conditions there have changed, and although ultimately Iraq has a “prosperous future,” its current condition is problematic.
“The country’s on the verge of a civil war,” he said, and told the soldiers the mission now is to transfer responsibility for Iraq stability to Iraqi troops, including what he said had been “neglected police capacity.”

Posted by: fauxreal | Jan 4 2006 21:04 utc | 15

the above link is to Stars and Stripes. sorry I didn’t close with the tag

Posted by: fauxreal | Jan 4 2006 21:05 utc | 16