But goddammit, it’s taking the terrorists more IEDs than ever before to blow up a given number of American soldiers. And that’s progress.
How come we don’t read more positive stories like that in the mainstream media?
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
November 2, 2005
WB: Metrics
Comments
The metrics are even worse on the US side:
.50-caliber ammo used so much that supplies run low
O great Creator of being Posted by: tante aime | Nov 2 2005 6:47 utc | 2 Tante: That sounds like one of those J M from beyond the grave spoken poetry journal songs. Are those part of the lyrics from a song when they were still a rock band era? Posted by: christofay | Nov 2 2005 6:56 utc | 3 Can’t think of a response that’s not snarky or bitter. Olbermann recently admired a young girl who shot a black bear for sport, I just watched (and enjoyed) an old Bruce Willis shoot ’em up, we (America) are arms dealer to the world and using our own product – what’s with the violence of humans, anyway? http://www.birdnature.com/allupperflyways.html Posted by: Over Soon | Nov 2 2005 7:17 utc | 5 Civilian contractors in Iraq dying at faster rate as insurgency grows “But using these figures it works out at around 300,000 bullets per insurgent. Let’s round that down to 250,000 so that we are underestimating.” No doubt about the “fragging thing” now. Posted by: anna missed | Nov 2 2005 9:22 utc | 8 A related note. Posted by: James E. Powell | Nov 2 2005 13:32 utc | 10 Metrics…
Speaking of “thugs and intimidators,” a timeless question …
Posted by: Anonymous | Nov 2 2005 15:41 utc | 11 Seriously, how much is it costing us, in parts and labor, to kill a “haji.” Multiply that by 1.3 billion and then the realist Republicans and Paleo-cons can argue that we can’t afford it, and the Democrats can argue that they can save money by killing more efficiently. New Yorker finally posted Entire text of Goldberg’s piece last week on Scowcroft: Breaking Ranks: What Turned Scowcroft Against Bu$h Posted by: jj | Nov 2 2005 19:27 utc | 13 |
||