It would be a crying shame if Fitzgerald closed the book before we get to the part where Hercule Poirot or Miss Jane Marple solves the crime.
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
October 28, 2005
WB: Final Countdown
Comments
The questions at stake in the case are, of course, relatively trivial. This may not be Shakespeare Posted by: annie | Oct 28 2005 7:16 utc | 2 Logic, I suppose, requires us to expect a Hutton report as opposed to Clint Eastwood (in the spagetti westerns, annie) and sure, its what is most likely to happen. But personally I expect, and demand for that matter, indictments! And a bunch of ’em. Today. Either way, its anger that I feel. Posted by: anna missed | Oct 28 2005 8:45 utc | 3 @ Night Owl
I want to know. Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Oct 28 2005 8:57 utc | 4 I want to be wrong about this but if you stop and think about it the people that pushed for one person one vote and equality before the law etc had to push pretty hard. Posted by: Debs is dead | Oct 28 2005 9:20 utc | 5 TALKEE TALKEE: Any trouble for the Regime will create financial chaos. Posted by: eftsoons | Oct 28 2005 9:32 utc | 6 @eftsoons Posted by: Debs is dead | Oct 28 2005 9:56 utc | 7 @Debs is dead Posted by: DM | Oct 28 2005 9:57 utc | 8 Is this the begining?: ( A poster at kos checks in with his community, and asks the big one, the one we all think about) Posted by: Uncle $cam | Oct 28 2005 10:13 utc | 9 feeling pessimistic, which is my habitude – but reinforced by contradictory report of wapo & nyt tho why i would accept anything from them is beyond me Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 28 2005 11:54 utc | 10 Just come on the BBC that Karl Rove has announced he’s not going to be charged. Posted by: Debs is dead | Oct 28 2005 12:20 utc | 11 Deep breath everybody. Rove hasn’t “announced” anything. Story in today’s NYT comes, surely, from Rove’s lawyers and PR team. I.e., if only Libby (and maybe other background types) is/are indicted today, then it’s a victory for them – even if Rove is left by Fitz to twist in the wind for now. Rove hanging out (“kept under investigation” by Fitz) is a worst case for bushco, as all will be terrified to communicate with the Karlster. MS America won’t care that much, IMO. Posted by: Hamburger | Oct 28 2005 12:38 utc | 12 Deep breath! Why? There won’t be anything different in this well trammelled case in a week or a year. Posted by: Debs is dead | Oct 28 2005 12:45 utc | 13 ‘Deep breath’ was meant w.r.t. the notion that Rove himself has announced (on BBC or elsewhere) that he won’t be indicted. My view is that this is pure Rovian spin. His team is setting up expectations for tomorrow and the NYT, as per usual, tells their story. Would set up tomorrow’s headline: Rove not indicted. That’s what the Rovians want America to hear. But in fact, being kept under investigation would be a very very bad outcome for KR. Posted by: Hamburger | Oct 28 2005 13:09 utc | 14 @ Hamburger Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Oct 28 2005 13:11 utc | 15 Hannah, good point. Wonder what’s up for grabs that Berlusconi would go for. Posted by: Hamburger | Oct 28 2005 13:24 utc | 16 WB Network will carry be that how matter no longer without permission Posted by: Kevin Day | Sep 17 2006 18:27 utc | 19 |
||