The Lord shall repay the evildoer according to his wickedness.
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
September 28, 2005
WB: Who Says God Is Dead?
Comments
“whom the gods will destroy, they first afflict with weird lower-jaw spasms.” Posted by: bianco | Sep 28 2005 19:49 utc | 1 Amen, it does seem something of a miracle. The truelly sad thing is, Delay gets a grand jury and in the long run, maybe some bad PR and a slap on the wrist in club fed, but these kids having a party get this: Posted by: JS | Sep 28 2005 19:58 utc | 3 AMEN!!!! Posted by: Dufus Galant | Sep 28 2005 20:36 utc | 5 And I say unto you: Posted by: Aigin | Sep 28 2005 20:44 utc | 6 It’s been a bad day for the Banana Republicans. First, House Majority Leader Tom Delay was indicted. Then, the SEC announced it is launching a formal investigation into Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist’s insider trading scandal. Posted by: AvengingAngel | Sep 28 2005 20:44 utc | 7 DeLay may step aside but anyone thinking the strings of power will be severed is deluded. His replacement will be the proverbial sock puppet, probably needing permission for even a bathroom break. Posted by: steve duncan | Sep 28 2005 21:08 utc | 8 One turd down, a whole bowl full yet to flush out. Posted by: hopping madbunny | Sep 28 2005 21:46 utc | 9 Guess they’ll join Kennyboy in retirement in Aspen, or perhaps Marc Rich in Switzerland – if they can find it on the map. French speaking part anyone?? Posted by: jj | Sep 28 2005 22:16 utc | 10 Amen! Posted by: dus7 | Sep 28 2005 22:19 utc | 11 steve duncan, speaking of DeLay and sock puppets, the internal power plays have already begun. David Dreier, “closet heterosexual” (Americablog), was Hastert’s choice to succeed DeLay, but Dreier has now been pushed aside in favor of Roy Blunt (the logical successor in terms of tradition). Josh Marshall says, essentially, that DeLay wanted Dreier to be his sock puppet. We can only speculate why Blunt has now overtaken Dreier, but the words “Dobson” and “homophobia” may be involved. Posted by: Leslie in CA | Sep 28 2005 22:24 utc | 12 jj, don’t forget that DeLay is also all tangled up in the ongoing Abramoff investigation . . . there’s still hope. Posted by: Leslie in CA | Sep 28 2005 22:25 utc | 13 leslie, you’ve inspired me. Posted by: annie | Sep 28 2005 23:27 utc | 14 Didn’t the Senate change its policies to accomodate indicted members the last time Tom “a better America without” DeLay got his wrist in danger of being slapped? I could swear I remember that. Posted by: Monolycus | Sep 28 2005 23:32 utc | 15
Posted by: annie | Sep 29 2005 0:08 utc | 17 and can we get an amen for bob(praise bob}dobbs! all hail the church of the sub-genius! hehheheee! Posted by: possum | Sep 29 2005 0:12 utc | 19 There does seem to be a lot coming to light about the intersection of the characters involved with Abramoff. Newsweek’s article: A Washington Sand Trap Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 29 2005 0:42 utc | 20 Can’t say I’m encouraged, as they only indicted Cockroach boy on one count. If they had 15, they could cop a deal, but one is nothing. Bastard probably won’t even get booked & printed. Posted by: Groucho | Sep 29 2005 0:44 utc | 21 Re: Earle’s motives for indicting/grand jury… Posted by: Stfish7 | Sep 29 2005 1:42 utc | 22 Being as happy as anyone that the Bug Man has been indicted, I nonetheless have a sense of foreboding in the form of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In Texas you see, the highest state court for civil cases is the Texas Supreme Court, but for criminal cases it is the Court of Criminal Appeals. My impression is that the criminal court is where Republican judge wannabes are put who are not smart enough to be trusted judging complex and important (i.e. Oil Company) civil litigation. Posted by: 4-fingers | Sep 29 2005 2:49 utc | 26 speaking of abramoff
wapo Posted by: annie | Sep 29 2005 2:59 utc | 27 since this seems to be the live thread au moment, I’ll repeat here that war-porn site that hit all our buttons this wkend apparently got a call from Pentagon & has yanked the stuff. Glad they handled it quietly, though others seems to have wanted a more public affair w/press conferences, felony indictments etc. Posted by: jj | Sep 29 2005 3:18 utc | 28 Maybe he’ll plead out. Is being ugly a misdemeanor? Wearing oil on your face? Posted by: ken melvin | Sep 29 2005 3:27 utc | 29 The Whore of Babylon on the Potomac Expresses Her Disgust–Sort Of Posted by: Anselm of Canterbury | Sep 29 2005 4:17 utc | 30 Everyone’s got their nickname for Tom DeLay. Billmon and the Kossacks call him “The Bug Man”. I’ve favored the moniker “The Ticking Termite” … and now his ticking has stopped. Praise Jesus and pass the crystal meth-erm, I mean, the Stolichnaya. You all can have whiskey — I’m partial to vodka. Everyone’s got their nickname for Tom DeLay. Billmon and the Kossacks call him “The Bug Man”. Posted by: Billmon | Sep 29 2005 5:59 utc | 33 RE: Court of Criminal Appeals Posted by: Stfish7 | Sep 29 2005 11:50 utc | 34 Thanks, Annie. I never got closure on that item… last I heard it sounded like the Senate had summarily exempted themselves from having to abide by the same laws they inflict on us plebs. Good to find out that wasn’t as done a deal as I was led to believe. Posted by: Monolycus | Sep 29 2005 17:00 utc | 35 I like to think that Earle slow-played his case. He presented evidence, and took a gamble that the grand jury would hand up the indictment for DeLay. That way, he got a little political cover for all the “partisan prosecutor” crap that is being thrown around. That’s right. I forgot all about “Snapper Tom”. Jesus, he does spark an uncanny resemblence there. Unfortunately, he’ll probably live just as long, too. thanks for the snapper tom reminder Posted by: annie | Sep 29 2005 19:26 utc | 38 |
||