I’ve got a sneaking suspicion that some morning soon Shaalan is going to wake up dead.
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
September 20, 2005
WB: Let’s Make a Deal
Comments
does anyone remember reading a story(perhaps in vanity fair or the new yorker) this summer about an american arms contractor who was killed in iraq who had made a deal to refurbish old equipment for the iraqi army. thousands of old tanks? he had made some deal worth multiple millions and got burned, the iraqi official he was dealing w/left the country
could it be the same incident, from around june/july? Posted by: annie | Sep 20 2005 17:46 utc | 1 Billmon wrote:
However:
(from the May 11, 2005 Independent) Posted by: MontyCanstin | Sep 20 2005 17:58 utc | 2 @annie – that would be Mr. Stoffel, a civilian arms dealer and CIA agent. Even Debkafile thinks he was creapy and then, after a good summary of the know facts, they add their spin and point to Syria and Saddam.
hm. maybe false alarm
but i can’t help wonder if they are connected Posted by: annie | Sep 20 2005 18:15 utc | 4 annie: the same thing in happening with former soviet union scrap, Posted by: tante aime | Sep 20 2005 20:39 utc | 6 Shaalan is obviously a Jordanian sposnsored patsy in this Iraqi expat merry go round that is robbing Iraqi and US citizens/taxpayers blind. Posted by: Friendly Fire | Sep 20 2005 21:00 utc | 7 The idea that the U.S. would give 1 billion dollars to people in Iraq to spend as they saw fit on weapons is ludicrous. Even factoring in the gross incompetence of the Bush Administration, it isn’t plausible that the worlds largest manufacturer and supplier of weapons (yes, the good old U.S.A.) would give a billion dollars so Iraq could buy old guns from Lebanon and rusty helicopters from Poland. I’m sure they could have given our billion dollars to our own defense companies. If this story is true, then it was just a money laundering scheme and I’m sure the money is connected in some way to the cronies and sycophants tied in with the amazingly corrupt Bush Administration. When the hell are people going to wise up to these guys? They are looting the treasury and no doubt having a laugh about it. Posted by: steve expat | Sep 20 2005 23:10 utc | 8 The idea that the U.S. would give 1 billion dollars to people in Iraq to spend as they saw fit on weapons is ludicrous. Posted by: Billmon | Sep 20 2005 23:24 utc | 9 an ex FFL guy, working for Kroll Int Assoc (KIA geddit ?) working for USAID pulled out. wearing body armour in the Green Zone was too much for him…and it was proving difficult to get paid for some security co’s – Aegis staff went on strike at the airport a fortnight ago over lost pay. Posted by: Edward Teague | Sep 20 2005 23:27 utc | 10 You bet we’re running out of money. Commissar Rumpy of the DoD sneaked in the announcement last week that we’re cutting the forces in Afghanistan next year by 20%. Whatever the number of men and effort that we’re expending there and in Pakistan isn’t enough to get Osama. Now it is a hard task sending soldiers into an unfriendly country chasing a few criminals but isn’t that the job? Posted by: christofay | Sep 21 2005 2:16 utc | 11 Still Silence From 9-11 SEC/FBI Stock Speculation Probe MIA Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 21 2005 2:24 utc | 12 That’s Very Interesting…but what does it mean? These guys just print money, or did I miss something? Is Wall Streeet starting to slap their hands? Is Asia no longer buying up Govt. bonds? I thght. I read something about that – that now hedge funds had stepped into the breach. Posted by: jj | Sep 21 2005 2:46 utc | 13 Yes, by all means LETS MAKE A DEAL Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 21 2005 3:15 utc | 14 “An estimate by Risk Management Solutions, an outfit in Newark, California, is that Hurricane Katrina caused $100 billion of damages, perhaps two-thirds of which were uninsured. The insured/uninsured distinction is not particularly relevant from a macro-economic perspective. In order to pay claims, insurance companies will have sell assets. In effect, this means that the demand for funds will rise. Individuals and businesses with uninsured losses will cut back on their saving and increase on their borrowing in order to rebuild. Congress has quickly authorized the expenditure of $10.5 billion in emergency aid in the wake of Hurricane Katrina’s destruction, with additional sums likely to follow given the magnitude of uninsured losses. Because taxes are not going to be increased, these hurricane-related federal expenditures also represent an increased demand for credit. All else the same, this increased demand for funds from the private and government sectors would put great upward pressure on the structure of interest rates. But if the Fed does pause in its short-term interest rate increases, then a large part of this increased demand for credit will be accommodated **through the commercial banking system** with the Fed providing the “seed money.” Posted by: tante aime | Sep 21 2005 5:33 utc | 15 Suddenly someone has realized that the same bunch of monkeys running our country by slipping on banana peels is also printing the currency. Don’t worry about the monkeys, Del Monte pays them to act funny. As for the currency, ask Mr Magoo just back from a meeting of his personality cult at the Jackson K Hole to print it bigger. At least it can work as wallpaper if it fails as a store of value and goes unmediated as a means of exchange. Posted by: christofay | Sep 21 2005 7:23 utc | 16 Iraqis to Bush — Where Did All Our Money Go? Posted by: Noisette | Sep 21 2005 8:50 utc | 17 The biggest “silence” of them all IMHO (as I wrote recently on European Trib) is that the US is like a mighty oak ready to collapse — a few more blows of the axe — and that collapse will smash a lot of other trees, whatever, and yet no one (except here on the loonie left) is shouting “timber!”. Posted by: Lupin | Sep 21 2005 8:54 utc | 18 @ Uncle $cam: Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Sep 21 2005 10:00 utc | 19 @Hannah K. O’Luthon Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 21 2005 10:36 utc | 20 Further, how many here know of Karl Rove’s role in helping to coalesce the Islamist element in the Republican Party. It should be noted that the Islamist, Al Qaeda and Al Taqwa elements that were raided on 3/20/2002 were linked directly to the Republican party’s ethnic outreach organization. “ . . . That brief conversation [between Norquist and Karl Rove] in Austin, Texas, helped start a new chapter in Mr. Norquist’s career—and in the political lives of Muslims in this country. The following year, Mr. Norquist started the nonprofit Islamic Free Market Institute. In collaboration with Mr. Rove, now Mr. Bush’s chief political adviser, he and other institute leaders courted Muslim voters for the Bush 2000 presidential campaign. Mr. Norquist even credits gains among Muslims with putting Mr. Bush in a position to win the critical Florida contest . . . To run the nonprofit’s day-to-day operations, Mr. Norquist turned to Khalid Saffuri, a Palestinian-American raised in Kuwait who had been an official of the American Muslim Council, a political group in Washington. The institute’s founding chairman was a Palestinian American, Talat Othman, who had served with Mr. Bush on the board of Harken Energy Corp. and later visited the president in the White House, according to records obtained by the National Security News Service.” (“In Difficult Times, Muslims Count On Unlikely Advocate” by Tom Hamburger and Glenn R. Simpson; The Wall Street Journal; pp. A1-A8.) Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 21 2005 11:13 utc | 21 @ Uncle $cam But, of course, that’s probably just what Uncle $cam had in mind when he set us this useful exercise problem, whose outcome is to reveal once again that it’s a small world. Posted by: Anonymous | Sep 21 2005 11:28 utc | 22 @ Uncle $cam Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Sep 21 2005 11:34 utc | 23 O rhe corruption goes deep w/these gangsters… Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 21 2005 11:38 utc | 24 for Uncle Scam – Silence – 9/11 – Compensation. Posted by: Noisette | Sep 21 2005 15:24 utc | 26 |
||