Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 10, 2005
Goldilocks Economy?

Via Alchemy of Trading comes this chart made by BCA Research:

If the major newspapers and the financial press think this is a goldilocks economy, i.e. not too hot, not too cold, but just right, one might start to take a contrarian position.

Somehow some numbers just do not add up to what is written in the headlines.

Average weekly wages for most workers rose in June by $1.01 to $541.22. This followed a 59-cent decline in May, the department reported, after revising its earlier figures. After taking into account the impact of inflation, wages for production and non-managerial workers, who account for 80 percent of the workforce, were 0.6 percent lower in May than a year earlier.

Comments

some time ago a fellow office worker told me the rules of staff work
admit nothing
deny everything
demand proof
make counter accusations
MSM and the cabal have a terrible record when it comes to truth. Thanks to you Bernhard and others every now and then we get a glimpse of the man behind the curtain.

Posted by: dan of steele | Aug 10 2005 21:12 utc | 1

Goldilocks: Hundreds Of Truckers Protest High Gas Prices – when the Neocons get their going on Iran, oil prices will tripple at least (read or listen to this recent Matthew R. Simmons interview).
That may very well induce major unrest in the US and elsewhere.

Posted by: b | Aug 10 2005 21:37 utc | 2

Touched 65 dollars per barrel yesterday.

Posted by: Jape | Aug 10 2005 21:40 utc | 3

Two inevitable consequences of freedom of speech: pornography and liberalism.
Sometimes it’s hard to tell the two apart.
I want to talk about the Constitution for a minute, because frankly, I’m sick of liberals hiding behind this historical document. There are some myths about the Constitution that badly need debunking. And I think it’s high time someone made the necessary effort to open our eyes to the truth.
First, liberals are always talking about how the Constitution is a ‘living document’ and therefore needs to be constantly interpreted and reinterpreted as times advance and society grows and changes. I say that’s hooey. The Constitution isn’t a ‘living document’, it is black and white words on print, and if it is to be interpreted, it must be interpreted very strictly by the standards of the great American patriots who wrote it.
What do we know about the writers of the Constitution? Well, they were our founding fathers and therefore as I have already stated, they were great American patriots, and therefore, it is as obvious as the nose on your face that none of them were liberals, because liberals are barely even Americans, much less patriotic ones. And if there were no liberals among the noble Founding Fathers who authored our Constitution, it seems obvious to me, and it should be obvious to any decent, straight thinking American, that any rights contemplated or set forth by our Founding Fathers in the Constitution were not intended for liberals. No, it is inarguable; our Founding Fathers had no intention of creating any ‘liberal rights’. The Bill of Rights is for good, decent, right thinking American citizens, and liberals have no business claiming it for themselves.
Even if you were to reject that argument – and only a liberal, by which I mean, a putative American who is clearly objectively pro-terrorist, possibly could – we then come to one of the other enormous myths about the Constitution, which is that it is this sacred document that must be upheld above all other things. But what about President Abraham Lincoln? No one would argue that he is without a doubt one of our great country’s very greatest Presidents, and what makes him great? The fact that, when he was confronted with a crisis of unprecedented proportion, he was wise enough to set aside so called ‘Constitutional rights’ to preserve the great nation whose care he had been entrusted with. The Constitution clearly gives each individual state the right to secede from the Union if that state should so choose; Lincoln understood that this was a terrible idea and he said no. Damn the Constitution. He set it aside, as sometimes must be done in time of war. And if Lincoln could do it, how can we hesitate to step up to the plate when an even worse crisis threatens our great nation now?
We are at war right now, no less than in the time of Lincoln. I do not speak of the War on Terror, but rather of yet another civil war, if one that the liberal mainstream media has successfully conspired to keep unspoken: the war between decent right thinking God fearing patriotic Americans and the selfish miserable terrorist sympathizing pro sodomy subversives who would turn our entire country over lock stock and barrel to the Kremlin, if only the Kremlin were still in business. I am speaking of an ideological war being fought in the classrooms, on our tv screens, in our movie theaters, and on the Internet even as we speak, a battle of Biblical proportions that is being waged for no less than the future of our nation and the world, and the very shape of how our children will see and feel and think in the years to come.
Yes, I am talking about a war between conservatives and liberals. They are not with us, therefore, they are against us. And make no mistake about it, my friend and neighbor, they are insidious enemies of all that is good and right and free and American and they must be stopped. By force of law if possible, or if not, then simply by force.
While Abraham Lincoln was a truly great President, there can be no doubt that George W. Bush is even greater. Like Lincoln, President Bush sees a nation in danger… grave danger, danger so critical that our country could go up in flames at any moment. And like Lincoln, our President understands that to preserve America and the very ideals of freedom and liberty in the long term, some sacrifices have to be made in the short term. And this wisdom and those sacrifices have never been more evident than in the absolutely vital words of the PATRIOT Act and the PATRIOT Act II.
Liberals whine about civil liberties being abridged and rights being lost, but in times of war there are going to be some losses. When our heroic men and women in uniform are dying in a distant land to protect your rights, how dare an unpatriotic and traitorous few insist on abusing those rights regardless of the cost to the moral fabric of our great nation? Does a soldier in a combat zone have freedom of speech? No he does not, and we are all soldiers in a combat zone now. All that remains to be determined is which side we are fighting on. Where’s your flag, soldier? Is it Old Glory… or is it the insidious pink banner of modern liberalism?
Let us return for a moment to the Constitution once more. The Bill of Rights guarantees freedom of religion, and once again, liberals use these phrases to justify tolerance of the worst, most barbaric, most brutal, most uncivilized, and most disgusting creeds, ranging from Islam to Hindu to Buddhism to Satanism. And it is nonsense. Our Founding Fathers were every one of them good decent Christian men and to them it went without saying that when they wrote about religious freedom, they were speaking in a Christian context. Certainly they meant to guarantee every Christian the right to worship God and His Son Jesus in any way they choose that is consistent with scriptural teaching, and they were certain that as America was indeed one nation under God, this would always be understood and would never have to be explicitly stated. Yet because they did not explicitly state it, we now have to listen to liberals bleating constantly about how even Moslems who strap bombs to their chests before walking onto school buses full of innocent children to kill every one of them in an orgy of insane Mohamed-mandated suicide/homicide have the right to worship as they please. In America? Moslems? Show me one Moslem who signed the Declaration of Independence. Show me one Moslem who died at Valley Forge.
America is one nation under God, and that God’s son is Jesus Christ. Americans are Christians, as our Founding Fathers were. Religious freedom is for Christians, just as freedom of speech is for decent patriotic Americans. Our Founding Fathers never meant to enact ‘liberal rights’, and certainly they never intended to provide religious freedoms to heathens and pagans and murderous anti-American idolaters.
While we are talking about the specious assignment of so called ‘rights’ we need to discuss the most pernicious abuse of this ridiculous doctrine, ‘gay rights’. Were any of the American Founding Fathers gay? I don’t think so. Did Thomas Jefferson wear a pinafore? Did Patrick Henry and Benjamin Franklin hold hands while they were drafting the documents that became the very fabric of the American Way of Life, and demand in a limp wristed lisp that George Washington to allow them to get married? Of course not. Liberals snivel about how the Constitution requires equal access to the law, and equal treatment under it, and since marriage is a matter of law, denying gays access to marriage violates the Constitution’s so called Equal Protection Clause. But, again, it could not be plainer to anyone of common sense that our Founding Fathers never intended to create any ‘gay rights’. In fact, given that America was created as a refuge from decadent, effete European monarchies, and our great nation was founded in rebellion against probably the gayest nation in the world, Britain, it should be clear that gays are not welcome here and should go back to wherever they came from. Or simply stop being gay, as is perfectly possible and achievable through many outstanding Christian sexual orientation support groups.
Now I want to talk about this obsession liberals have with so called torture. It should go without saying that the people being ‘tortured’ deserve it, and anyway, they aren’t Americans, not even as American as liberals are. Yet what I think is truly despicable is when liberals use these instances of necessarily vigorous patriotic interrogation in defense of our great nation to draw insidious comparisons between the United States and Nazi Germany. It is odious and ridiculous. Three questions for the liberal intelligentsia (so called):
(1) Is it the 1930s or the 1940s?
(2) Is this Germany?
(3) Is anyone in the U.S. military a card carrying Nazi of any sort?
The answer is no, no, and of course, a huge resounding no. Three no’s, which should put all this to bed once and for all. This is America, the country that totally triumphed over Nazi Germany in 1945, the greatest, most free, proudest, strongest nation in the history of the world. To compare America to Nazi Germany is wrong, it is hateful, it is hurtful, and it is treason. When we say things like that, or tolerate other so called Americans saying things like that, the terrorists win.
I also want to address the recent media hounding of a great American, Karl Rove. There is a lot of talk about him doing something that liberals claim is wrong. I am not even going to go into details because honestly it is all very sickening that a man of Mr. Rove’s stature even has to be assailed in this way and I do not want to dignify these cheap accusations by repeating them. Liberals try to make this all something very complex, but to any true American, it is a very simple matter. President Bush has stated that Karl Rove has his full confidence, and to a good patriotic U.S. citizen, that should be all that is necessary. When the elected leader of your nation personally vouches for a member of his own administration, that should be enough for any patriotic, properly supportive citizen, at least, when the President speaking out is a man of character and honor like George W. Bush.
Let us never forget, when pinko liberal softies like Bill Clinton were avoiding military service and traveling to Moscow to provide national secrets to his Communist masters there, George W. Bush proudly and bravely and selflessly served in our nation’s fine military. When John Kerry was staging enemy ambushes and shooting our own boys in the back so he could act his way into some unearned, undeserved medals, George W. Bush was flying high in an aircraft emblazoned with the Air Force insignia. George W. Bush is the greatest hero in American history, and he is leading America to an era of unprecedented international glory despite all the liberal wimps biting at his ankles like fluffy little toy poodles. And while there are ramifications to every action that the American people cannot understand and should not be told due to national security concerns, one thing we can take to the bank is this: if George W. Bush tells us something is true, then it is as good as gold.
This is why the recent so called ‘debate’ regarding the well established and utterly valid scientific fact of intelligent design is so ridiculous. The ‘theory’ of evolution is exactly that, a ‘theory’, and one that has been rigorously and definitively disproven in every religious text. Let us never forget that even as recently as the turn of the 20th Century, so called ‘scientific principles’ were ‘proving’ absolutely that a heavier than air craft could never get off the ground, and, in fact, that a hummingbird could not fly. ‘Science’ and ‘math’ can always be mistaken, but the word of God is invincible and irrefutable. It is self evident to anyone with a functioning brain (which of course is why liberals don’t get it) that a universe as complex as the one we inhabit could not ‘just happen’, and basic thermodynamics shows it is impossible for a more complex organism to ‘evolve’ out of a simpler one.
Anyone should be able to understand this, but for those Americans who still cannot comprehend it, our great leader President Bush has made it absolutely clear: intelligent design is a proven scientific fact and needs to be taught as such in our classrooms. Further debate on this subject is both unnecessary and unpatriotic.
I simply want to say one more thing before I go. While it is not proven that all liberals are pedophiles, it should be noted that it is an established fact that all liberals are card carrying members of the ACLU, and the ACLU has successfully defended the Man-Boy Love Association on the grounds of freedom of expression. So are all liberals boy loving kiddie rapers? Evidence is still being gathered, but I think the conclusion is fairly obvious, even before the FBI closes its ongoing investigation. Which leaves us with the question – in the undeclared civil war, which side are you on: America’s – or the pinko boy loving kiddie rapers?
No true American would need even a moment’s thought to answer that question.

Posted by: Super Patriot | Aug 11 2005 1:06 utc | 4

Doesn’t card-carrying have a hyphen in it? It does on my card.

Posted by: biklett | Aug 11 2005 2:47 utc | 5

I can’t wait to see the look on Super Patriot’s face when he dies and I ram my divine throbbing sinker up his puckery virgin orb of delight.

Posted by: Christ the Lord | Aug 11 2005 2:51 utc | 6

i truly hope that the super patriot is fucked by the steel prick of god – where it may offer some hope of redemption

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Aug 11 2005 3:10 utc | 7

@Christ the Lord
I don’t think Super Patriot’s going to be dying anytime soon. Read the post again; he’s certainly a persona.

Posted by: Jape | Aug 11 2005 3:17 utc | 8

SUPER PATRIOT, I COMMAND YOU: COMMIT SELF-ABUSE NOW, RIGHT NOW, OR I SHALL CAST YOU INTO THE FIERY MAW OF HELL. I AM THE LORD, PROVE YOUR FAITH IN ME. NOW NOW NOW SPILL YOUR SEED ON THE GROUND.

Posted by: GOD THE FATHER | Aug 11 2005 3:19 utc | 9

I think if everyone here holds virtual hands and intones the word ‘Hillary’ three times, SP’s head will explode. Too bad we can’t bring ourselves to do that.

Posted by: biklett | Aug 11 2005 3:30 utc | 10

even as parody, superpatriot is not that funny, because the rightwing punchline is auschwitz.
I have relatives who talk like that. no shit.

Posted by: slothrop | Aug 11 2005 3:50 utc | 11

yo! patriot-dude! i agree, to a degree. Lincoln fucked up as bad as bush. the best thing that could have happened to the US would have been the separation of north and south. it would have stopped one of the most brutal wars in history.

Posted by: lenin’s ghost | Aug 11 2005 4:40 utc | 12

@slothrop
Are you really unable to appreciate the irony in this piece? It was clearly written by someone who, like you, has had his proper fill of this kind of talk. The clues are all over the text, and it’s really very funny. This is essential to winning the argument at the end of the day, you know: taking the piss out of the militant right wing. If you insist on taking a parody of their drivel seriously, how in the hell are you ever going to laugh the real thing to shame? If you have an alternative plan to fix them up through self-criticism and reeducation, then, ah, you’re on your own, and good luck.
(Oh, and I have relatives who talk like that, too. But unlike your relatives, I don’t think that mine would cite the laws of thermodynamics as part of a proof that “the word of God is invincible and irrefutable”.)

Posted by: Jape | Aug 11 2005 4:43 utc | 13

Household Spirits Show Improvement
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_28/b3942033_mz010.htm
“Start a little war. Deficits don’t matter.”
Dick Cheney
This isn’t the story of Goldilocks, this is
the story of Rumpelstiltskin.
And while we’re speaking of Grim Fairy Tales, let’s talk US military, and specifically, the Presidio, San Francisco, a Republican commander,
a pederast and a wikkan, who perverted the Presidio’s daycare to his satanist Pentangle sacrifice, and then hid behind “Constitutional freedom of religion” rights for wikkan warlocks to practice their base perversion.
(This is no conspiracy, we had friends working there during that time who confirmed the rumors. It was real, it happened.)
http://www.theconspiracy.us/9410/0026.html
http://www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/littleboys.html
Don’t ask, don’t tell. Here be Super Patriots!
Karl, Craig, George, Skull & Bones, Temple of Set, Nazi-Satanic cult, you can’t get any more Grim than that.

Posted by: tante aime | Aug 11 2005 5:27 utc | 14

http://www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/menuhelp.html
There’s lots more than child sex rings in the Bush-Cheney World Neo-Fascism League.

Posted by: lash marks | Aug 11 2005 6:09 utc | 15

@JJape
About the whole parody thing: GW sometimes reminds me of Super Patriot. With his every word he gives away the fraud, in fact he confesses the fraud. But people eat it up.
What’s creepy isn’t Super Patriot, but the sheer certainty that this parody would sound, instead, like Gospel to boatloads of wingers, that they wouldn’t crack a gallows grin, but use it as an articulation of why to to crack some heads wide open. And even the thought of someone maiming and killing another based on misunderstanding a parody – well, that’s zombie creepy.

Posted by: Anonymous | Aug 11 2005 6:21 utc | 16

Sorry, that was me above.

Posted by: citizen | Aug 11 2005 6:21 utc | 17

Some parts were funnier than others, and had me rolling…

Let us never forget, when pinko liberal softies like Bill Clinton were avoiding military service and traveling to Moscow to provide national secrets to his Communist masters there, George W. Bush proudly and bravely and selflessly served in our nation’s fine military. When John Kerry was staging enemy ambushes and shooting our own boys in the back so he could act his way into some unearned, undeserved medals, George W. Bush was flying high in an aircraft emblazoned with the Air Force insignia. George W. Bush is the greatest hero in American history, and he is leading America to an era of unprecedented international glory despite all the liberal wimps biting at his ankles like fluffy little toy poodles. And while there are ramifications to every action that the American people cannot understand and should not be told due to national security concerns, one thing we can take to the bank is this: if George W. Bush tells us something is true, then it is as good as gold.

Others were (I shit you not) too subtle –

(1) Is it the 1930s or the 1940s?
(2) Is this Germany?
(3) Is anyone in the U.S. military a card carrying Nazi of any sort?
The answer is no, no, and of course, a huge resounding no. Three no’s, which should put all this to bed once and for all. This is America, the country that totally triumphed over Nazi Germany in 1945, the greatest, most free, proudest, strongest nation in the history of the world. To compare America to Nazi Germany is wrong, it is hateful, it is hurtful, and it is treason. When we say things like that, or tolerate other so called Americans saying things like that, the terrorists win.

Yes, I know that this is written for MOA, but I do encounter this exact brand of feces regularly dropping from the mouths in my neighborhoods – sorta ruins the fun.
Of course, the “totally triumphed” above was worth a snicker…

Posted by: Anonymous | Aug 11 2005 6:34 utc | 18

Beautiful, Super Patriot

The ‘theory’ of evolution is exactly that, a ‘theory’, and one that has been rigorously and definitively disproven in every religious text.

But yes, it is indeed a sad day when we have doubts whether this is parody, and we have no doubts that a number of people would not take it as parody.

Posted by: Jérôme | Aug 11 2005 14:29 utc | 19

Superpatriot and Christopher Hitchens: separated at birth?

The New York Times ran a fascinating report (subscription only), under the byline of James Glanz, on July 8. It was a profile of Dr. Alaa Tamimi, the mayor of Baghdad, whose position it would be a gross understatement to describe as “embattled.” Dr. Tamimi is a civil engineer and convinced secularist who gave up a prosperous exile in Canada to come home and help rebuild his country. He is one among millions who could emerge if it were not for the endless, pitiless torture to which the city is subjected by violent religious fascists. He is quoted as being full of ideas, of a somewhat Giuliani-like character, about zoning enforcement, garbage recycling, and zero tolerance for broken windows. If this doesn’t seem quixotic enough in today’s gruesome circumstances, he also has to confront religious parties on the city council and an inept central government that won’t give him a serious budget.
Question: Why have several large American cities not already announced that they are going to become sister cities with Baghdad and help raise money and awareness to aid Dr. Tamimi? When I put this question to a number of serious anti-war friends, their answer was to the effect that it’s the job of the administration to allocate the money, so that there’s little room or need for civic action. I find this difficult to credit: For day after day last month I could not escape the news of the gigantic “Live 8” enterprise, which urged governments to do more along existing lines by way of debt relief and aid for Africa. Isn’t there a single drop of solidarity and compassion left over for the people of Iraq, after three decades of tyranny, war, and sanctions and now an assault from the vilest movement on the face of the planet? Unless someone gives me a persuasive reason to think otherwise, my provisional conclusion is that the human rights and charitable “communities” have taken a pass on Iraq for political reasons that are not very creditable. And so we watch with detached curiosity, from dry land, to see whether the Iraqis will sink or swim. For shame.

…and now an assault from the vilest movement on the face of the planet… Hmmm. Watch out neo-cons, this worm may be turning again!

Posted by: citizen | Aug 11 2005 14:52 utc | 20

Okay, I confess, I am ‘Super Patriot’. The essay was written in a frenzy of disgust after I made the rounds of a few of the more ‘intelligent’ and ‘reasonable’ right wing blogs a few days ago, just to try and see if there was anyone over there saying anything worth listening to.
It’s meant to be parody; parody so broad, painted with such a venomous brush, that nobody with two functioning brain cells could possibly take it seriously. Personally, I thought all that raving about Thomas Jefferson in a pinafore and Patrick Henry holding hands with Benjamin Franklin would give it away before anything else, but I also thought the whole thing was pretty obviously ridiculous just on the face of it… like, well, pretty much every conservative talking point is nowadays.
I seeded it around on a few conservative blogs as well, and will be curious to see if anyone over there has any response to it. The only problem is, it’s very long, and conservatives tend not to have much of an attention span. However, I do kind of cynically expect that it will be taken rather more seriously on that end of the spectrum than this, if anyone reads it at all.
I’m about to post it on my own blog, just to see what kind of response it gets there from my small but generally very liberal readership. (A couple of my relatives are very conservative, though; I’m kind of expecting them to send me a case of beer, or something, as they will probably think I am serious, and have finally ‘come to my senses’.)
Anyway, I’m glad to find people over here who not only read the whole thing through, but who instantly realized it was meant to be a joke. I hope it was at least somewhat entertaining. Thanks.

Posted by: Highlander | Aug 11 2005 16:14 utc | 21

Somewhat scary.

Posted by: beq | Aug 11 2005 16:30 utc | 22

Highlander,
I don’t think anyone here missed that it was parody. It’s just creepy to read, recognize the parody, and recognize that actual daily discourse is already at the same level of absurdity assayed by many of your paragraphs.
The C Hitchens bit was mostly my attempt to exemplify the rotten line between parody and hackery that stains our “free press” these days. My apologies for being unclear, and especially for harshing your buzz. That’s a damn fine ear for the lingo you’ve got working there.

Posted by: citizen | Aug 11 2005 17:13 utc | 23

Oops, my bad Super Highlander.
Christ may have misunderstood you…

Posted by: citizen | Aug 11 2005 17:18 utc | 24

Highlander (aka S-P):
GREAT job!. I was chucklling in the 2nd paragraph and roaring by the end.
But the thought that kept occuring to me was that some troll was going to pick this up and carry it home. But then again, it was too well written. I think we all will be interested to learn what responses it created in the conservative blogs where you posted it.
Amazing & confounding as it is, I, too, have relatives and acquaintances who talk that way. And, biklett, I do believe you are correct. Card-carrying is hyphenated. That hilarious first post capped off the reading!

Posted by: Lymond | Aug 11 2005 19:38 utc | 25

Lymond,
I hope some wetbrain somewhere picks up on this and goes into insane right wing hyperventilative frenzies about it. It’s an idle daydream of mine, but I’d love to see the deep right fringe crazies pick up on this and start staging “NO LIBERAL RIGHTS” marches throughout the Midwest. If the crazies on the far right edge were to adopt some of my talking points and start insisting that the mainstream Republican party do it too, well… we’re all looking for ways to split the right.
I don’t think it will happen, but, well, you never know. Smaller seeds have grown into stranger trees on the Internet…
Citizen,
Well, I think Jesus swallowed it whole. I suspect rememberinggiap took it rather literally, too. And you didn’t harsh my buzz. The whole thing was an exercise; I was trying to see just how closely I could ape the rhetoric of O’Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, et al. I think I even scared myself.

Posted by: Highlander | Aug 11 2005 19:53 utc | 26

@Highlander – if you have more nice pieces like the above please send them to MoonofA at aol dot com. Those need to be on the front page (a bit late now for this one).

Posted by: b | Aug 11 2005 20:09 utc | 27

Voltaire, Market Analyst
Business sure is booming. Oil hit $66 per barrel today, and traders are talking about $70pb as “an achievable target”. If you don’t work directly for an oil company or have an immediate family member who does, it may be time to start dusting off those gardening skills.

Posted by: Jape | Aug 11 2005 20:32 utc | 28

Highlander, I really enjoyed your piece. I’ve had some similarly exasperating experiences, and you have captured the tone extremely well. The sententia, the continual use of straw man caricatures, the abandonment of logical structure. Overwhelming. Nice to be overwhelmed with laughter on this occasion, rather than despair.
Thanks!
(Bye the bye, I think that one important tell for me was the conpicuous absence of that modern-day atrocity of a shibboleth, “islamofascist”.)

Posted by: Jape | Aug 11 2005 21:48 utc | 29

Bernard,
I had no idea Moon of Alabama had open enrollment. I’ll email you copies of the occasional political posts I put on my blog from now on.
Jape,
Yeah, I didn’t use ‘pro-sodomite’ anywhere near enough, either. 😉

Posted by: Highlander | Aug 11 2005 22:53 utc | 30

highlander
no offense intended, but this is much funnier, because it demonstrates how what is offered as prodigiously intellectual conservatism can only manage to be a cruel parody of its own professed humanism and compassion.
my fav: ” People like Max Weber, Edward Banfield, Samuel Huntington, Lawrence Harrison and Thomas Sowell have given us an inkling…” whew! Weber never found himself in the company of greater minds, or to find himself used in a defense of american exceptionalism. uber alles, babe.

Posted by: slothrop | Aug 12 2005 1:06 utc | 31

@slothrop
A few of my favourites:
The music, news, magazine and television markets have all segmented, so there are fewer cultural unifiers like Life magazine or Walter Cronkite.
(No mention of Jet or Ebony? — oh, sorry, those weren’t for the white folk, were they.)
In a much different and less violent way, some American Jews have moved to Hebron and become hyper-Zionists.
(From the Wikipedia entry on Hebron: “After the massacre of Muslims at prayer by Baruch Goldstein in 1994, an international unarmed observer force – the Temporary International Presence in Hebron (TIPH) was established in order to maintain a buffer between the Palestinian Arab population and Jews residing in the ancient Jewish quarter.” To be fair, it doesn’t mention the calibre of bullets used by the good Dr Goldstein, so maybe he was being “less violent” in some narrower technical sense that would have meaning to David Brooks’ audience.)
From Africa to Seattle, religiously orthodox students reject what they see as the amoral mainstream culture, and carve out defiant revival movements. From Rome to Oregon, antiglobalization types create their own subcultures.
(People like the Mormons, the Scientologists, Jim Jones, Shoko Asahara. Getting back to those roots.)
In the political world, Democrats and Republicans seem to live on different planets.
(Would that it were so, David, would that it were so.)

Posted by: Jape | Aug 12 2005 2:27 utc | 32

brooks: If you are 18 and you’ve got that big brain, the whole field of cultural geography is waiting for you
glad to see brooks has moved up the high school student audience now

Posted by: b real | Aug 12 2005 2:33 utc | 33

moved up to

Posted by: b real | Aug 12 2005 2:36 utc | 34

And need I point out the core ridiculousness?: brooks is jewish. for fuck’s sake.

Posted by: slothrop | Aug 12 2005 2:42 utc | 35

highlander
what humour i have is expended laughing at myself. the world & its current state i do not find funny at all. hulour, irony, slapstich, vaudeville burlsesque are provided daily without even trying

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Aug 12 2005 2:54 utc | 36

Ah, yes. That big brain thing.

Posted by: Jape | Aug 12 2005 3:04 utc | 37

(The above following on from b real)

Posted by: Jape | Aug 12 2005 3:05 utc | 38

@slothrop
You know, I would never have guessed.

Posted by: Jape | Aug 12 2005 3:08 utc | 39