Be afraid, Karl. Be very afraid.
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
July 15, 2005
WB: Man Versus Machine
Comments
RAOFLMFAO ! Ah, If only I could believe these bastards could fall … Posted by: Outraged | Jul 15 2005 6:58 utc | 1 When will the MSM get the picture, Billmon? They treat the man as if he were just another functionary, and I think that’s strange. I think it’s very, very strange indeed. Posted by: alabama | Jul 15 2005 6:59 utc | 2 Krugman: Karl Rove’s America
“Listen! Understand that NeoCon Machine is out there! It can’t be reasoned with, it can’t be bargained with. It doesn’t feel pity or remorse or fear. And it absolutely will not stop. Ever. Until you are dead.” Posted by: tante aime | Jul 15 2005 7:06 utc | 4 I thought it might be a few years from now, but this might wind up being settled on the streets. The US had a nice run but it may be over! Posted by: R.L. | Jul 15 2005 7:07 utc | 5 There is a quote in GK Chesterton’s The Man Who Was Thursday about being ready for the battle of Armageddon (a spiritual battle between good and evil, not the crap the rapture loonies peddle) and the times we live in constantly remind me of that. Posted by: Lupin | Jul 15 2005 7:49 utc | 7 John Dean weighs in on Rove . Posted by: jj | Jul 15 2005 8:48 utc | 8 Hehe… Posted by: MarcinGomulka | Jul 15 2005 8:54 utc | 9 @jj Posted by: Monolycus | Jul 15 2005 9:26 utc | 10 Since July 1, I’ve been getting overly excited about the prospects of a Rove indictment. It reminds me too much about how I felt in the days before the 2004 election when Zogby called it for Kerry. Posted by: lawrence | Jul 15 2005 10:47 utc | 11 I think Fitzgerald knows what he’s doing. He wouldn’t play this game unless he thought he would win. That’s the stake in it for him. The HARD challenge and the potency that apparently wants expression. This is a big opportunity for him and I trust he’s playing his cards well. Posted by: jm | Jul 15 2005 11:53 utc | 12 Fitzgerald certainly knows what he’s doing. But he’s taken on the case and has no choice but to play the game at this point. Even if he’s been dealt a bad hand. Some people have suggested that Fitzgerald must have something good up his sleeve if he’s sending reporters to jail. But what if Miller has all of the aces? Perhaps her testimony is the key to everything, but she won’t testify… Posted by: lawrence | Jul 15 2005 12:22 utc | 13 Considering how long he’s been preparing this case, I don’t suspect this scenario… That Miller has all the aces. It’s tying into Saudi Arabia, oil companies, and the whole crime network of these boys. A lot of people were involved, so someone should get nailed. There are other issues… obstruction of justice and more. Posted by: jm | Jul 15 2005 12:43 utc | 14 This is why I think it’s better for the Dems to either call bullshit or simply wave past the current GOP foo-fah. Fitzgerald isn’t going to give a flying fuck about this, and indictments can’t be spun. Posted by: ahem | Jul 15 2005 12:59 utc | 15 I was ecstatic when Fitzgerald was named to this job two years ago–serious shouting joy–because he’s been our US Attorney around Chicago for a couple of years now and has a reputation as a nonpartisan no-nonsense bulldog. I get the impression that he won’t be satisfied until every politician who’s committed a crime goes to jail. He’s going to get our former governor (Ryan-R) put in jail, and I about half-expect him to get Daley sent to jail someday. He’s my prosecutorial hero, beating out even Spitzer, since he doesn’t seem to share Spitzer’s interest in higher office. Posted by: Levi | Jul 15 2005 13:18 utc | 17 More than Rove should be worried. Try this one on for size: Posted by: jm | Jul 15 2005 13:29 utc | 18 Apparently Rove testified that Novak already knew Plame was CIA. So who told Novak? And does Rove have clearance to know Plame was CIA? If not, who told him? There’s been speculation that Posted by: gylangirl | Jul 15 2005 14:12 utc | 19 Follow jm’s link to Justin Raimondo’s ‘Rove-gate: Who Leaked to the Leakers? ‘ Posted by: John Francis Lee | Jul 15 2005 14:25 utc | 20 I hope people will follow jm’s link to Justin Raimondo’s ‘Rove-gate: Who Leaked to the Leakers? ‘ It’s a very comprehensive look into “The Cabal” as they call themselves. Posted by: Anonymous | Jul 15 2005 14:59 utc | 23 Wait a minute. Didn’t both Cheney and W consult with personal attorneys [in contrast to White House Counsel] when the investigation first began? Why would they need to obtain personal legal counsel regarding this case? Posted by: gylangirl | Jul 15 2005 15:02 utc | 24 I’ve said ever since 9/11 this is all about Yassar Arafat. If you recall, last we heard, Sharon had him bottled up in his headquarters, bombed but defiant, and bus-bombings happening every week in Israel. Posted by: tante aime | Jul 15 2005 15:11 utc | 25 You just know behind closed doors in the White House (and elsewhere) there is intense strategy plotting occurring every spare minute on the Rove issue. It’s ludicrous to be told otherwise. Much of Bush’s entire second term hinges on a favorable outcome. By “second term” I mean the billions of dollars being funneled to hundreds of various entities that turn right around and give back a percentage of it to the RNC. I’m tempted to think there is so much money at stake an unfavorable outcome won’t be permitted. The law, the Constitution, international conventions and treaties, even the very laws of science and nature, don’t matter to these people. They’re impediments and trifles to be shredded and discarded as necessary. The same will hold true in protecting Rove and anyone else involved in this travesty. Posted by: steve duncan | Jul 15 2005 15:49 utc | 27 I don’t think it’s about Karl. I think it’s about Cheney, about Scooter and Elliot and Cheney and the whole cabal. I think Karl has inoculated himself by this latest revelation. He didn’t say “Valerie Plame” so he is off the hook. Karl’s job was to not say her name while nodding. Dick’s job was to say her name while looking out the window apropos of nothing. Elliot’s job was to draw a diagram of the Wilson marriage and the CIA while not saying “Valerie Plame” out loud. Scooter’s job was to silently usher people in and out of the room and say “he has something to say to you” without saying who “he” (the Vice President, in silhouette against a window in a darkened room) was or what “something” was. They all knew everything, but each had only a small part of the revelation. No culpability. Plausible deniability. Clean hands. No taping system. No attribution. A careful script. This should be John Adams’ next opera. The speculation here is energetic. Posted by: slothrop | Jul 15 2005 16:24 utc | 29 pasquino, maybe they all knew everything about the outing of Valerie Plame, but it’s not humanly possible (given the tempo and simultaneity of the process) for anyone to have known everything about every other thing–some of which would have filtered into the Plame affair, and some of which would have filtered out of the Plame affair into different, and neighboring, spheres (at this point, we can only guess what these other spheres might be). Nothing less than a long, slow, patient inquest by a large team of experts could hope to reconstitute the affair. It must be very, very complex–so complex that only a person with access to all the testimony could follow it longways and sidewise, up and down, backwards and forwards, before and after, a priori and a posteriori…..It’s my belief that Fitzgerald, and only Fitzgerald, has the means and suppport to do this. I also take it on faith that the material warrants such study, since it could, in principle, amount to nothing more than a vast and intricate tissue of misdemeanors….less an opera by John Adams than by Rossini (opera buffa or by Verdiopera seria. Posted by: alabama | Jul 15 2005 16:36 utc | 30 The final piece in the Plame puzzle is obstruction of justice. We’d be much better off with Bush gang, beaten up by scandal, domestic policies discredited, humiliated but made de facto submissively respectful to international law, etc. Let’s work to repeal the 22nd Amendment and keep the laughinstock in there, and keep some newer better credible murderer (clinton, mccain, jeb, whoever) out. Posted by: slothrop | Jul 15 2005 16:40 utc | 32 slothrop, we aren’t setting an agenda here, just doing a little research on current affairs, as opened up by Billmon’s initial post on this particular thread….Would you like to kick off an agenda thread? Posted by: alabama | Jul 15 2005 16:55 utc | 33 I really worry about tante aime. When I look away quickly after posts like the last one, the walls are ripply and the sofa on the other side of the room breathes. Clearly, the Matrix is laboring unter great strain. I just hope tante aime has keanu’s reflexes when the action scenes start. Posted by: Roger Bigod | Jul 15 2005 16:57 utc | 34 alabama Posted by: slothrop | Jul 15 2005 17:01 utc | 35 The particulaties of this political crisis always already (heh) describe the general momentum. I’m just trying to be a good historical materialist by pointing out this dialectic–by assiduously uncovering, I hope, some contradictions. Posted by: slothrop | Jul 15 2005 17:09 utc | 36 fitzgerald earns the name bulldog, unlike the other bulldog we heard about this year. i wonder how far back he’s going to go. if he is investigating David Wurmser and John Hannah might he also be following the yellowcake via flietz and bolton, as raimondos link inplies? in that case not only would it lead directly to cheney but also drag in the entire office of specail operations . luti the whole gang. that’s the implication. and if they were boltinizing the info might that lead to the possible creation of the original niger docs? hersh story leads us to believe that the cia created the docs but what if it was the flietz wing of the cia that mustered up the yellowcake docs
Posted by: annie | Jul 15 2005 17:27 utc | 37 Billmon, you do not know how absolutely THRILLED I was to read old editor’s quote. Posted by: four legs good | Jul 15 2005 17:43 utc | 38 slothrop, I think the Cyberdine dialectic is faithful not only to the thread, but to Pynchon’s reticular imagination…which is totally cool. Posted by: alabama | Jul 15 2005 17:50 utc | 39 @alabama thank jm, i was just following all the links from raimondo’s story Posted by: annie | Jul 15 2005 17:54 utc | 40 I think Raimondo’s article rightly pulls many parts together, but this Frankenstein monster (and Rove is not the brain for that one) has been coughing up info phelgm for some time. Posted by: fauxreal | Jul 15 2005 18:10 utc | 42 above mcgovern link claims
what that statement doesn’t take into account is that bolton had been stovepiping back in the summer/fall of 2001. maybe his investment in the yellowcake goes alot father back than the dec 02 factsheet. and if bolton is as ruthless as everyone seems to think and had been working on this for quite some time.
aparently failure and negotiation are not an option for this guy. Posted by: annie | Jul 15 2005 18:27 utc | 43 Thanks fauxreal – nice collection thanks to you, b. Posted by: fauxreal | Jul 15 2005 18:54 utc | 45 In a further development, it was reported in an Italian newspaper today(7/03) that an African diplomat offered Italian intelligence services documents relating to Saddam’s alleged attempts to buy uranium in Africa. Posted by: annie | Jul 15 2005 18:57 utc | 46 oh, and one more thing…if their were two sets of forgeries, and the second were so bad, would those be the ones Hersh referred to in his mention of former agents who did not expect the info would be allowed? Posted by: fauxreal | Jul 15 2005 18:58 utc | 47 annie- from my link above, via La Repubblica: Posted by: fauxreal | Jul 15 2005 19:02 utc | 48 jeez, i’m so egg in face w/ my links. i have to preview EVERYTIME. anyway my point being, if the first report wasn’t up to par in oct , then the letterhead doc were stolen in dec/jan that preceeded the second flushed report.why couldn’t the theft have been a plant to support the second set of docs? Posted by: annie | Jul 15 2005 19:04 utc | 49 Lawrence: It reminds me too much about how I felt in the days before the 2004 election when Zogby called it for Kerry. Posted by: Marie | Jul 15 2005 19:06 utc | 50 “The report in La Repubblica, largely based on unidentified Italian secret services sources, also linked a theft at the Niger embassy in Rome during the 2001 New Year’s holiday to the affair. Posted by: annie | Jul 15 2005 19:21 utc | 51 I don’t know anything about Fitzgerald, so from time to time, I do wonder whether he would just pull an “Iran-Contra” and just close up the shop after the investigation is over. So I do welcome your informed observations. Posted by: bcf | Jul 15 2005 19:36 utc | 52 this a text i have written for another kind of fascist – it would seem to be the dreams of karl rove – perhaps it belongs on this thread Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jul 15 2005 19:43 utc | 53 Niger Forgeries are a Red Herring Posted by: John | Jul 15 2005 20:14 utc | 54 I’m so glad you all took to the link I posted. I knew I was in the right place. Posted by: jm | Jul 15 2005 22:37 utc | 55 John- could you elaborate a bit? Do you have some links to help me to understand what you’re talking about? Posted by: fauxreal | Jul 15 2005 23:37 utc | 56 @Fauxreal Posted by: Outraged | Jul 15 2005 23:56 utc | 57 outraged Posted by: slothrop | Jul 16 2005 0:20 utc | 58 I agree that the USA was a pawn in a bigger game. These players have no allegiance, but they are paranoid, and double crossing is the favorite activity. The neocons might have fallen into a trap. Posted by: jm | Jul 16 2005 0:22 utc | 59 The neocons prepared for a long time for a fascist takeover and this was their one big chance. I don’t believe it’s possible given the personality of our country. This is what these people failed to get. They tried to impose a foreign historical model on the country and there wasn’t a fit. It’s really interesting as the country tries to wiggle free. Posted by: jm | Jul 16 2005 0:28 utc | 60 Outraged- what I found interesting about those stories I noted above is that Newsweek notes that Franklin met with Ghorbanifar, and continued discussions with him after the Paris meeting…I don’t have my time frame clear…Paris meeting, Italy meeting..or were they at the same time? Posted by: fauxreal | Jul 16 2005 1:58 utc | 61 That’s their huge mistake. War is temporary power. It always peters out. And weakens in the long run. You’d think they would have that figured out. The gun runners win, but they don’t worry as war will be occurring somewhere at all times. Or the threat of it which leads to the building of arsenals. Posted by: jm | Jul 16 2005 2:09 utc | 62 @jm – Greatly enjoy yr. posts, but would you pls. be clearer about yr. use of “they”. It’s not always clear who you’re referencing as there are many players. Posted by: jj | Jul 16 2005 3:05 utc | 63 Ha! Ha! jj. Posted by: jm | Jul 16 2005 4:04 utc | 64 Lastly, governments grow out of the germ plasm of the society. You can’t really impose a dictatorship. It has to come naturally from within as the people’s need dictates. Posted by: jm | Jul 16 2005 4:07 utc | 65 @Fauxreal 7:37pm Posted by: John | Jul 16 2005 9:26 utc | 66 John- I think the Straw (man) moment is where Chalabi and his aide come in, since, as noted above, they were feeding “Iraqi defectors” to make claims about weapons. That’s my guess, at least. Posted by: fauxreal | Jul 16 2005 14:28 utc | 67 fauxreal, Posted by: John | Jul 16 2005 18:20 utc | 68 John- I see the Plame issue as one part of a bigger concern: the way that the administration knowingly lied to Congress (probably with their unspoken consent) and the American people (only half of them with consent) to invade another nation on false pretenses. Posted by: fauxreal | Jul 16 2005 19:55 utc | 69 fauxreal, Posted by: John | Jul 16 2005 21:38 utc | 70 |
||