Back to Main
July 21, 2005
WB: King of Comedy
Comments
There might be more to this rush job than meets the eye. Could they be preparing for real trouble ahead? Some Supreme Court involvement?
Iran Contra Revisited?
Posted by: jm | Jul 21 2005 5:48 utc | 1
Any tips on how to get to antiwar.com? Both this link and one from last week just hang.
Posted by: catlady | Jul 21 2005 6:15 utc | 2
@ Catlady
Type http://www.antiwar.com
into appropriate box and navigate the whole site. You
should be able to find what you want, and it’s well worth
visiting.
Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jul 21 2005 6:34 utc | 3
The name of the article is, “Patrick J. Bulldog Fitzgerald, an American insurgent.
Well worth the search.
Posted by: jm | Jul 21 2005 6:46 utc | 4
White House officials say it’s ridiculous to think the president would rush a decision.
I’m beginning to understand this use of the word “ridiculous”.
Karl Rove outing Plame was “ridiculous”. Torture and desecration at Guantanamo was “ridiculous”. The rigging of Iraqi elections was “ridiculous”. The US toppling Aristide in Haiti was “ridiculous”. The fabrication of intelligence on WMD was “ridiculous”.
“Ridiculous” means “Of course we (and our base) know that allegation is true, but we don’t need to admit it to you, and we’re too smart to deny it and be caught out by the facts.” We cannot be convicted of perjury for saying an allegation is “ridiculous”. “Ridiculous” also seems to invariably satisfy the MSM.
Posted by: PeeDee | Jul 22 2005 0:52 utc | 5
Thanks for pointing that out PeeDee. I’ll be watching for that keyword as this thing progresses. Reckon I’ll see it a lot.
Posted by: rapt | Jul 22 2005 2:22 utc | 6