Not covered in other threads …
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
July 15, 2005
Other News Thread
Not covered in other threads …
Comments
What could be both more poignant and ludicrous than Commander Abdul Baqi Balots’s account of his survival of a firefight in which his closest friend was killed ?
THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MOUNTAIN contains accounts of numerous actions fought by the Afghan resistance when the Mujahideen were our allies, men of faith, and trusted ‘brothers in arms’, before we collectively demonized them and declared them all (not just terrorists) our newest enemies. It provides a haunting parallel view into the current world of the Afghanis and possibly even Iraqi’s currently fighting against a new foriegn invasion and occupation, through thier eyes. Each account is told by the Afghan commander who participated in the action described. These commanders in the vast majority, were civilians who took up arms against the Soviets and developed the skills necessary to command guerrilla units. Posted by: Outraged | Jul 15 2005 7:02 utc | 1 John Deutch, deputy secretary of defense from 1994 to 1995 and director of central intelligence from 1995 to 1996, is a professor of chemistry at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
With regard to Deutch’s comments, can it be that isolationism is about to stop being a dirty word in American political discourse? I, for one, hope so. It has deep roots in American tradition, and can appeal to a wide spectrum. Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jul 15 2005 7:47 utc | 4 Andrew Sullivan on Abu Ghraib and the Schmid report:
In other news, I went outside and sailed in my dinghy today. Not much wind but that’s not really the point, is it? Posted by: jonku | Jul 15 2005 8:49 utc | 6 kpnku Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jul 15 2005 10:24 utc | 7 Defining “Humane” Down, Part III — The Schmidt Report
Posted by: b | July 15, 2005 03:21 AM | # Posted by: jm | Jul 15 2005 11:45 utc | 10 @Hannah – With regard to Deutch’s comments, can it be that isolationism is about to stop being a dirty word in American political discourse? I, for one, hope so. It has deep roots in American tradition, and can appeal to a wide spectrum. @ b The crack-pot realists confound the American style of life (i.e. hyperconsumption) with the American way of life (i.e. constitutional government as a means to secure the blessings of liberty). Of course, all such ideals are more frequently honored in the breach. Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jul 15 2005 14:16 utc | 12 enjoyed that nyt/cameroon op-ed on africa, b. btw, femi kuti is touring the u.s. this month. Posted by: b real | Jul 15 2005 14:57 utc | 13 from the goodnews/badnews desk:
more at Fortunately it’s a nice governmental gang Posted by: citizen | Jul 15 2005 15:22 utc | 14 Faiza Jarrar recently visted Vermont, and she found some things very familiar:
Khalid and his family have been speaking out about what is going on in Iraq. Those who have donated to or followed the Jarrar’s medical relief efforts will know that we are talking about a man and his family who are essential to Iraq’s future. This is an attack on Iraqi society, on a person who dares to love. Posted by: citizen | Jul 15 2005 15:54 utc | 15 GAO investigator rips Pentagon on Iraq war finances
b real: yeah Femi is touring. He will be in DC tomorrow night at the famous 9:30 Club. I will be there. I am a huge fan of AfroBeat and High Life and wish there were more African artists out there performing that music instead of R&B. Posted by: Bubb Rubb | Jul 15 2005 18:10 utc | 17 Historic event should not be allowed to pass without everyone noting it. Posted by: jj | Jul 15 2005 18:18 utc | 18 an extract of my piece for theatre ‘terrible knowledge’ which would seem to constitute the nightly dreams & sweat of mr karl rove: Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jul 15 2005 19:41 utc | 19 @r-giap – sorry, I would like to read that and follow it – it’s impossible in that format – really sorry. b Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jul 15 2005 20:27 utc | 21 @jj
It’s a perfectly resonable stance to take, I would suggest. Here, let’s try the reciprocity test:
The difference here would be we’ve threatened first use of nuclear weapons on countless occassions, even against non-WMD states, i.e. Iraq 2003 ? In China’s case they have a, questionable or not, claim to Taiwan re secession … remind me, the Civil War was about secession, wasn’t it ? Posted by: Outraged | Jul 16 2005 0:26 utc | 22 @Outraged, there’s no reasonableness test here, it’s about POWER. I’m still looking around for an article that gives me the background on why the US would make an issue of Taiwan in the first place, unless again it’s about power or strategic proximity. If you know of any, I’d really appreciate a link. Posted by: jj | Jul 16 2005 3:54 utc | 23 for a nice take on the Taiwan read Thomas P Barnett (?) about a month back when that certified jack ass Rober Kagan, having done his work on Iraq, was moving on to a war over Taiwan, by putting out crazy Navy propaganda. Posted by: razor | Jul 16 2005 4:03 utc | 24 You’re going to want to see this. Just get a barf bag first! Posted by: Anonymous | Jul 16 2005 4:13 utc | 25 Is that Goggins or Gogal?
Some politician’s statements these days are wonderfully absurd. Wonder what he intends for the 18 year-olds that tell him to piss-off? Posted by: DM | Jul 17 2005 6:15 utc | 28 |
||