Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 10, 2005
It’s That Time Again

(yes, another oil post – it’s been a while…)

I’ve been writing about the very low spare capacity in oil production, as shown by that graph from the recent survey on oil by the Economist:

 

Now OPEC is admitting that there will be no spare capacity later this year.

At full capacity, Opec `may not meet Q4 need’ (Gulf Times, 9 May 2005)

ALGIERS: Even if Opec pumps at full capacity it may not be able to meet strong fourth quarter demand without sufficient inventories being built up beforehand, Algeria’s oil minister has said.
Chakib Khelil said he was not concerned by the current situation in the oil market, but rather about the fourth quarter, which traditionally sees a sharp rise in demand due to cold weather.
"Let’s assume we go to a maximum (in output) and assuming we don’t have any (significant) stocks, we are not going to meet demand in the fourth quarter," Khelil said on the sidelines of an energy ceremony in the capital Algiers.
"What you need to do is raise stocks in the third quarter to accumulate enough of them in the third quarter that you can deplete stocks and maintain a high level of production for the fourth quarter. That’s what I’ve been saying we need to do," he said.

"People are still worried that despite that we will be producing at full (capacity) we are not going to meet (demand), that’s what people are worried about and they are also worried about what will come next year," Khelil said.
"They have to be concerned because we are not going to have any surplus capacity available so anything could happen during the first quarter and that’s showing in the market," he said.
Khelil said a strong global economy, with oil demand driven by the US and China, meant prices would remain high.
"The only way we are going to have a slack in prices is if the economy really slows down," he said.

And a second oil minister weighs in in a similar vein:

Oil prices up on speculation about demand (Business Week)

Prices were given an upward nudge after Qatar’s oil minister, Abdullah Hamad al-Attiyah, raised concerns over the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries’ capacity to deal with demand for the next Northern Hemisphere winter, when global consumption peaks.

"OPEC is at its highest production in history. I am concerned about that. If we reach the full capacity now, we will tighten in the fourth quarter," Dow Jones Newswires quoted al-Attiyah as saying. "The spare capacity will be smaller and smaller, reaching a plateau when there is no more oil."

OPEC pumps around 40 percent of world oil and raised production to about 30 million barrels daily this year in an effort to boost stocks and steady prices ahead of summer. The increased production has some analysts concerned that OPEC is pumping at full tilt, with no spare capacity in the event of an unscheduled outage or a sudden rise in global demand.
This is why the markets did not go down last month when OPEC announced two production increases within a few days – they interpreted that as a capitulation by OPEC, i.e. an acknowledgement that production would be insufficient in the second half of the year (where consumption is traditionally, for seasonal reasons, higher than in the first half), and that it was thus necessary to increase production now, despite the lower current demand, to build up stocks to be drawn upon later in the year.

So the fact that stocks are growing to record levels today is not good news, it’s the last tool available to make supply match demand throughout this year – it gives producers a few more months to increase their production to catch up, but there is no reason to think that they will be able to do it any better next year than this one.

THIS IS IT. THERE IS NO MORE SPARE OIL PRODUCTION CAPACITY. It will take a massive recession (which is increasingly likely, but that will only punch back the problem by a couple of years) or a violent increase in oil prices for demand to slow down and adjust to available supply.

In the meantime, volatility is likely to go up tremendously as any temporary disruption in oil flows will have an IMMEDIATE impact on prices (see today’s situation when a power cut in a refinery sent the oil price up by more than 2%).

Do not believe the pundits saying that stocks being high is a good thing. Get ready for serious upheavals.

And 2 OPEC ministers the same day? Either they like living dangerously by talking the price up, or they are desperately trying to warn us that the supply side cannot cope anymore and it’s high time for US to do something on the demand side…

Comments

And 2 OPEC ministers the same day? Either they like living dangerously by talking the price up, or they are desperately trying to warn us that the supply side cannot cope anymore and it’s high time for US to do something on the demand side…
Or maybe they have some thousands of calls on arab light at $65/bl?

Posted by: b | May 10 2005 23:47 utc | 1

I don´t want to debunk you Jérôme, but OPEC ministers are not reliable sources in my view.
We will have $100/bl this year or next spring and I am betting real money on that but the reason may be very different from what those guys say. (Iran anyone?)

Posted by: b | May 11 2005 0:47 utc | 2

Rather this is the current justification for our near future foreign policy, and the continued “price gouging” of the average american, via overly high pump prices, and their broad economic ripples. Oil market prices rose today, on yet more refinery folly, which is starting to look very similar to the great DRAM shortages of the early nineties, which were equally manufactured. How much of the middle class “tax cuts” from first term are now leaving pockets in the form of higher payments on goods and services. Is not the Krugman forcast right on the money, if anything he was too optimistic.
The “hide the oil peak” game, is just that. A “recession” is not a “solution that will lessen oil consumption” it’s a tragedy. The recession comes not from a lessening of oil production- “which itself is a well managed fiction”. It’s that the real gas of the US economy, the average Joe’s pocket book is close to empty. And the short sighted 1%, haven’t forseen the economic dustbowl they are working so hard to create. Worker’s pay is the fertalizer in which an economy grows, you get stingy with you fertilizer and overwork the ground… well you get the idea.
The coming depression is the consequence of robber baron economics. If labor doesn’t get paid they can’t buy the goods. The workforce IS the market. The top 1% can’t possibly spend as much or as efficently as the bottom 99%. And when the 99% are not allowed “to create” to grow the pie, because these acts of creation would remove some of the 1%, you have a recipe for the current mess.
There are serious solutions to energy management but this administration would rather continue its fantasy land/long knife policies than get its backer’s houses in order. The real strength of any administration is its ability to say no to its backers, not to bend the farthest to those who pay the most. When you bend as much as Cheney and Co to your base you are showing the world HOW WEAK YOU ARE.
You want lower oil prices? Get the Bolton NSA transcripts on the front page of the WaPo. Are you listening Dana Millbank, Walter Pincus, Bob Woodward? Are you guys happy to watch the nation slide to disaster? Have some honor guys, or maybe you’d like to spend August in Tehran, huh?
Get the memo from the British onto the frontpage of the NYT, WaPo, and LAT. BEAT THE DRUMS and get these incompetents out of office! Stop cowering in fear, as this administration continues to force rationalizations of its corruption and thefts, and speak the truth.
Will Bill Mon try to paint a rosie picture and say the recession/depression event can be pushed off till the next administration, or will he recognize the housing bubble bursting in England, which was 8 months ahead of us in the raising of interest rates. How bout mentioning the brilliant diplomatic moves of Team China in its now 3 year long coming out party- Japan just yeilded earlier this week, following Taiwan’s own recent kowtow. Or maybe we can talk about the bottomless consequences of unlimited outsourcing, that internet technologies have enabled. Or maybe, lets be real crazy and mention the implications of Franklin spy case, and how even our war powers can now be used for political purposes. Maybe this is why Robert McNamara is rethinking MAD….
The January “election” in Iraq proved to be the window dressing we though it was going to be. We now know that even to get to this point this administration had to willfully lie to itself, gut its own intel agencies, spy and black ops on its own officials. In what way does anyone think this administration has any ability to change or come up with any kind of solution out of this mess? They must be removed from office!
What will 2008 look like with a continuance of this nonsense? Can any one really see an improvement of any kind domestically or internationally between now and 2008? Throw these guys out and get someone who won’t make things worse.
To all the media bush backers. How much did it cost to dress your guy up last summer and fall? Was it worth it? I hope you got paid in yaun because you won’t be able to spend that cash here.

Posted by: patience | May 11 2005 2:58 utc | 3

It’s THIS time again too perhaps for the Northern Latitudes of our Favorite Continent, if this is true. (What does anyone think of an Environment/Natural Science Thread – open, ongoing??) But this seemed an impt. context art. for this thread, so I hope I’m not being disrespectfully OT.
Remember what happened to Northern Europe last time the Gulf Stream Stopped?
 Climate change researchers have detected the first signs of a slowdown in the Gulf Stream – the mighty ocean current that keeps Ireland and Europe from freezing.
    They have found that one of the “engines” driving the Gulf Stream – the sinking of supercooled water in the Greenland Sea – has weakened to less than a quarter of its former strength. The weakening, apparently caused by global warming, could herald big changes in the current over the next few years or decades. Paradoxically, it could lead to Ireland, Britain and northwestern Europe undergoing a sharp drop in temperatures.

Link

Posted by: jj | May 11 2005 4:51 utc | 4

b – I know that OPEC Ministers are not the most reliable of sources, but what was interesting was that (i) they confirmed publicly what the whole market knows already (at least those that are paying attention) and (ii) two of them came out almost simultaneously.
I seriously doubt that they need to be talking up the markets, the facts are doing that nicely enough for them, so I wonder if this is their way to try to signal to a wider public the situation which they are really being worried about.
The only other way to do that (get people’a attention) is that the prices actually go to 80 or 100, which will happen soon anyway, and will get them all sorts of unpleasant attention (as in – if prices really go up, they might have to face the business end of some F-16 or SEALS).
The point is – anything and anyone can send the prices in the stratosphere now.

Posted by: Jérôme | May 11 2005 5:42 utc | 5

Could this help solve the problem??
Cortez sophmore builds model hydrogen car

Posted by: jj | May 11 2005 6:13 utc | 6

Jérôme – what I do not understand is how a problem in a U.S. refinery can result in a higher price for crude oil?
Is there any economic explanation besides speculation?

Posted by: b | May 11 2005 7:29 utc | 7

b – I agree that in principle the two markets are not directly correlated, and a refinery closing should increase the price of gasoline and other final products (which it did) while depressing temporarily that of oil (as there is less immediate demand).
However, I think that the market is all too aware of the unstable balance between supply and demand on the oil side, and any stumbling block in the whole chain is seen as a risk of a penury and thus a reason to increase oil prices.
Actually, if supply is fully stretched, it would be a rational response: lower gasoline production in a time of strong demand means that future production will have to catch up, thus putting continued pressure on future oil prices – if supply is at its maximum, any oil which is not processed immediately means that the unused processing capacity will be missed in the future, future capacity will require full oil production for that much longer, and this will make it more difficult to do future maintenance as well.
It’s not pretty. The main sign that things are not going well is really the fact that long dated oil is not going down – the markets do not expect oil prices to go down anymore, because demand will keep on being buoyant in the face of stagnant supply.

Posted by: Jérôme | May 11 2005 8:33 utc | 8

jérôme
are ou still in greece. in the middle of a general strike over the eonomic conditions there

Posted by: remembereringgiap | May 11 2005 12:07 utc | 9

Nope, I’m back; barely spent 24 hours over there, did not visit anything (business trip – wind farms). Since my last visit in 1992, they obviously have built some nice highways/train lines (thank you Europe). It’s still visibly poorer than our part of Europe and Middle-Eastern-y (or Mediterranean) to some extent.

Posted by: Jérôme | May 11 2005 12:13 utc | 10

Is that the Panachaikou project that Vestas just announced they are supplying? I’m jealous. My grandfather was Greek and I would love to work there.

Posted by: thewindmiller | May 11 2005 12:54 utc | 11

Not that one (although I will try to get involved there as well…)

Posted by: Jérôme | May 11 2005 13:10 utc | 12

@Jérôme,
wind farms in Greece? Could you tell me where, if it is not a bussiness secret?
@thewindmiller
Working in Greece? Not a good idea.
Living in Greece? That’s a wonderful idea!

Posted by: Greco | May 11 2005 14:45 utc | 13

Vestas receives order for 41 units of V52-850 kW wind turbines for Greece
The Vestas Group has received an order for 41 units of V52-850 kW wind turbines for a project located near the town of Patras, on the Peloponnese in Greece.
The order has been placed by EOLIKI Panachaikou S.A., a company whose main investor and shareholder is CESA HELLAS, S.A. a Greek subsidiary of the Spanish company Corporación Eólica CESA, SA, which owns and operates several wind farms in Spain.

Posted by: thewindmiller | May 11 2005 15:16 utc | 14

@Greco
Unfortunately, I must work to live.

Posted by: thewindmiller | May 11 2005 15:17 utc | 15

Greco – also near Patras, but another project. Can’t really say more.

Posted by: Jérôme | May 11 2005 15:42 utc | 16

Ultra-clean coal

Engineers in Nottingham are developing ultra-clean coal that could make power generation 50% more efficient and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by a third.

Posted by: b | May 11 2005 17:58 utc | 17

I’m sorry to intrude, but anyone know anything about EOLIKI Panachaikou S.A.?
I live in Patras and I’d love to get involved in such a project!
Any info about the firm (location, tel numbers, e-mail) would be appreciated.
Timos

Posted by: Timos A. | Oct 20 2005 14:37 utc | 18