|
|
|
|
March 8, 2005
Billmon: 03/07
March 7, 2005
Known Unknowns
How?
Newsweek, via Dan Froomkin, on a Bush "townhall" meeting:
The pressure groups website says:
Recruit, educate, train, mobilize to fight – interesting language …
Open Door Thread
Come in, come in … March 6, 2005
Customs Duties or Interest Rate Hike?
Warren Buffet thinks trade policy should be used to correct the U.S. current account deficit. I do think this is the wrong way.
Billmon: 03/06
March 5, 2005
Billmon: 03/05
More Anti-Military Slurs from the MSM Of course that was to be expected. These lubral media are the real terrorists! Through the Looking Glass – Humpty Dumpty on the difference of "carve out" vs. "add-on". Why should there be any? March 4, 2005
Billmon: 03/04
The Chinese think about the merging of the Chinese and U.S. culture. Both honestly care for the Rectification of Errors.
Plus:
Screw Up Or Plan?
U.S. Fires on Car Carrying Freed Hostage
If this was a screw up, imagine how many of these are happening every day without any reporting. If this was a plan … UPDATE: Fresh from the ticker
What would the headlines say? And the Krauthammer’s and O`Reilly’s OpEd’s and comments?
Send Me A Letter
The blog Newshounds received a letter from the syndication company of Faux’ Bill O’Reilly demanding to:
This column is as ridicules as one could expect.
People who know about children and sex education do answer questions that children have. It helps to keep them healthy and to not grow up to some harassing bigot like Bill O´Reilly is. Now please, here is the link to that column again. Please send me a letter. Please.
Semi-Directed Open Thread
Keep talking… A few bar snacks: Oil majors in scramble to tap Qatar’s extensive gas reserves Ukraine ex-minister linked to murder of journalist found dead March 3, 2005
Billmon: 03/03
1,500+100,000+54.60+
More than 1,500 GI’s have died in Iraq by now. Additionally some 200 contractors and some 100 soldiers from several other countries died. The accounts vary: Iraq Body Count only counts confirmed civilian dead, some 18,000 by now, directly attributed to the war and not including possible insurgents. They say their numbers are certainly an underestimation. The scientifically correct Lancet study (free sub.) four month ago did give, as the most probable number of war related Iraqi casualties, 100,000. This was not the maximum number as some reports said, but the most probable. Today that number is likely higher. Uncounted are still the future victims of this war. Especially those from radioactive dust distributed through the use of depleted uranium ammunition and other long term illnesses. Higher today are also oil prices $54.60/bl and going for $80.00/bl, if not higher. This does not only mean recession, but it will also kill people, because the price for wheat, corn, rice and soybeans will rise with the oil price and the poor on this planet will not be able to afford food. The fruitless actions of the military and the mercenaries will continue, as will the prices for commodities, until the U.S. public wakes up and kicks ass. In Vietnam it took more than 50,000 killed GI’s to bring the war to an end. What will it take in Iraq? March 2, 2005
Billmon: 03/02
Völkischer Beobachter as People’s Choice
To Cynically Manipulate
Two weeks ago, Paul Krugman advised for Wag-the-Dog Protection
Lighter Than Air
To change oh so slightly the topic from the doom and gloom of previous posts, here’s a bit of good news, unless you are DeAnander: The Flying Taxi:
Billmon: 03/01-2
Both are white: Pots and Kettles March 1, 2005
China – Desert Threatens 400 Million People & Other Scary News
Well, after my previous post about China’s laudable attempts to develop renewable energy (see below), here’s a darker picture, still taken from the subscription part of the Financial Times: Shifting sands threaten China’s economic march
Cont. reading: China – Desert Threatens 400 Million People & Other Scary News
Billmon: 03/01
State Department Lies in Human Rights Report
Correction: – Sorry I got the original story wrong. – I accused the U.S. State Department Human Rights report of lying, when it said about a man tortured in Syria that he had "returned home to Syria to visit his family". I assumed the man mentioned was Maher Arar, who had been abducted by U.S. officials and was send to Syria to be tortured. With this assumption in mind, it looked like a lie. But the State Departments report may refer to Abdullah Almalki who is a Canadian-Syrian and who did return to Syria to visit relatives. Both men, Maher Arar and Abdullah Almalki, are reported to have been severly tortured in Syrian prisions. There are some 47,700 Google links related to "Maher Arar" and some 1,220 related to "Abdullah Almalki". I did assume the wider reported story was the base of the report. So the State Department may not have lied as I alleged. But the State Department has the hypocrisy and chutzpah to include the case of a Abdullah Almalki in their human rights report on Syria, while ommitting the very well documented case of Maher Arar. In the omitted case the US administration is directly responsible for Human Rights violations. It was obviously convinient, to not include it. This in mind, you still may want to read my original uncorrected post below the fold. |
||