|
Billmon: Law of the Land
This deserves your comments. The current direction of policy in the US compared to that of the Nazi regime does not fit (yet). But the convergence is obvious – at least from outside the US.
Just look at another new Billmon post: Onward Christian Soldiers which does align to the Gott mit Uns belt buckle my father, as million others, was wearing during WWII.
When I came upstairs, Beere was at the telephone, one of the three or four telephones in the whole of Abeokuta. Her tone was angry, I had never seen her so furious with anyone.
‘Let me tell you Mr. District Officer, we are not impressed. We are by no means impressed – no, not surprised either. I knew it was coming and when I heard it on the radio all I could think was, just like them, just like the white race. You had to drop it on Japan, didn’t you? Why didn’t you drop it on Germany? Tell me that. Answer my question honestly if you can – why not Germany?’
There was a pause while she listened to what the other speaker had to reply.
She laughed – a dry, bitter sound. ‘I give you credit for intelligence, but not for honesty. That was a merely clever answer, it was not honest. You know bloody well why. Because Germany is a white race, the Germans are your kinsmen while the Japanese are just a dirty yellow people. Yes, that is right, that is the truth, don’t deny it! You dropped that inhuman weapon on human beings, on densely populated cities…’
Her face became more agitated as she listened, then broke in again. ‘Yes, you know damned well what you should have done if you sincerely desired their surrender. You could have dropped it on one of their mountains, even in the sea, anywhere they could see what would happen if they persisted in the war, but you chose instead to drop it on peopled cities. I know you, the white mentality: Japanese, Chinese, Africans, we are all subhuman. You would drop an atom bomb on Abeokuta or any of your colonies if it suited you!’
– Wole Soyinka, aké: the years of childhood
“the nazi’s didn’t lose the war; they just had to move”
Originally called Operation Overcast, Operation Paperclip was the codename for the operation by the US intelligence services and military to extract scientists specialising in rocketry (e.g. V-1, V-2), chemical weapons (e.g. Zyklon-B) and medicine from Germany after the collapse of the Nazi government during World War II. These scientists and their families were secretly brought to the United States, without State Department review and approval. None of them qualified for visas because they had all served to further the cause of Hitler’s Third Reich in World War II.
Scientists were deployed at White Sands Proving Ground, New Mexico and Fort Bliss, Texas to work on guided missile and ballistic missile technology, and led to the foundation of NASA and the US ICBM program.
Over 700 members of the Nazi scientific community were brought to the US as a direct result of Operation Paperclip, many of whom were still ardent Nazi supporters.
– wikipedia entry for Project Paperclip
…not to mention that the CIA was birthed during the same period and several nazi officers found new positions as instructors for the CIA/AID Office of Public Safety, training and organizing “police and paramilitary officers from around the world in techniques of population control, repression, and torture.” [john stockwell, the praetorian guard: the us role in the new world order]
..and continued experimentation on humans in new medical & mind control programs, such as MKULTRA
CIA to Release More Nazi War Criminal Data
Sunday Feb. 6, 2005
The CIA has agreed to release more information about Nazi war criminals it hired during the Cold War, ending a standoff between the intelligence agency and the group seeking the documents, Sen. Mike DeWine said Sunday.
DeWine, R-Ohio, was lead Senator author of a 1998 law that required all U.S. government documents related to Nazi war crimes to be declassified, but the Central Intelligence Agency had resisted giving up details about the work performed by agents with Nazi ties.
The law has led to the release of more than 8 million pages of documents, including 1.25 million from the CIA, which showed that the agency or its predecessor, the Office of Strategic Services, had a relationship with some individuals later found to be war criminals.
Some documents obtained by the working group, for example, show that the CIA recruited and hired five assistants to Adolph Eichmann, the man known as the architect of the plan for exterminating the Jews during World War II.
…
After World War II, the emerging struggle with the Soviet Union dominated the resources and attention of the United States, even at the expense of the task of locating and punishing the perpetrators of the Holocaust. The May 1960 Israeli capture of notorious Nazi Adolf Eichmann, however, refocused public attention on those men who had managed to elude justice in the chaos of the immediate postwar period. For the CIA, this unexpected event would force a re-examination of some of the former Nazis it had recruited in the rush to produce intelligence results during the Cold War in the 1950s. Newly released records show that at least five of Eichmann’s associates, each a significant participant in Hitler’s war upon the Jews, had worked for the CIA. Additionally, the records reveal that at least 23 war criminals or Nazis were approached by the CIA for recruitment. The documents help answer the question of how and why these war criminals were given employment, assistance, and, in two cases, U.S. citizenship by a nation that had lost more than 300,000 lives in World War II.
In early 1950, the Austrian police began asking questions about Otto von Bolschwing, a former SS officer hired by the CIA in late 1949. Bolschwing’s SS personnel file had been among those captured at the end of the war. To protect this agent from any war crimes trial, however, the CIA decided that any prosecutors who asked for Bolschwing’s SS personnel file should be told, “no files available.” Bolschwing had worked with Eichmann before the war in planning the expropriation of Jewish property in Austria and later served as the SS consultant to the forces that staged the bloody pogrom in Bucharest, Romania in 1941. In 1953, in recognition of Bolschwing’s work for U.S. intelligence, the CIA pressured the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service to let him enter the country. He later became a U.S. citizen. When U.S. Congress in the 1970s forced an examination of U.S. policy toward Nazi war criminals—creating at the time the Office of Special Investigations in the Department of Justice—Boschwing was investigated and then stripped of his citizenship. OSI found Bolschwing on its own. The CIA never turned him in to law enforcement. He died in 1982. [source]
ward churchill:
One would do well to recall that the crimes attributed by Americans to Good Germans were that they’d celebrated a New Order of their own, looking away while the nazi crimes were committed never attempting to meet the legal/moral obligation of holding their government to even the most rudimentary standards of human decency. For these sins, it was said, they, the Germans, civilians as well as military personnel, richly deserved the death and devestation that had been rained upon them by America’s “Might Eight” Air Force and its British counterpart. In sum, they’d “brought it on themselves.” [ghosts of 9-1-1]
…
Natsu Saito, wife of embattled ethnic studies professor Ward Churchill, said someone vandalized Churchill’s truck Wednesday morning by scrawling swastikas on it.
…
Scholars estimate the North American Indian population at 15 million at the time of Columbus’s arrival. In 1900, the US census found that there were 237,000 Indians in North America. This dwarves anything that Hitler ever did. What is interesting about the American architects of genocide is that they don’t even feel the need to use euphemisms. They openly called for the “extermination” of the Indian, while nobody can find a single statement by Hitler that is so blunt. [source]
…
“Just when you thought we’d killed all the Indians, one pops up talkin’ some shit like this, and reminds you that we didn’t finish the job after all.”
…
..I asked her why she had been angry about the bombing of the Japanese. Were they not Hitler’s friends?
‘The white man is a racist,’ she said. ‘You know your history of the slave trade, well, to him the black man is only a beast of burden, a work donkey. As for Asians – and that includes the Indians, Japanese, Chinese and so on, they are only a small grade above us. So, dropping that terrible weapon, experimenting with such a horrifying thing on human beings – as long as they are not white – is for them the same as experimenting on cattle.’
– Wole Soyinka, ibid
Why, when all of my ancestors are snake-bitten, and I’m snake-bitten, and I warn my children to avoid snakes, what does that snake sound like accusing me of hate-teaching? – Malcolm X
Posted by: b real | Feb 13 2005 6:32 utc | 18
Re. Billmon. Comparing – or at least juxtaposing – the present US Gvmt. with long past fascist regimes, with emphasis on the Nazis, brings to light very general similarities between but two authoritarian and bellicose states. Many of the characteristics are shared by others, for example, Saddam’s torture policy was more or less similar on the ground, but differed in the fact that it was not codified, rationalised, and written down. (Or not in the same way…?…but Saddam had the same powers as the Fuehrer..) Posters single out the important aspect – that is, the propaganda and poison that insiduously brings the Volk, and the servants of the State, on board and turns them into flag-waving sadists. With some of them merely being frightened, or even lucid, conformists.
Any understanding of the process, the why and how of it, must be anchored to the particular case, here, let’s say, very recent US history. (But see b real on the past at 1.32.)
History is always false in a sense; we make it up as we go along, it serves the present and the future, as it must, both pragmatically and epistemologically. In recent years the US people have been presented with a world view, or a reading guide, an interpretative schema that is so wildly and ludicrously unreal or untrue that the mind…well…reels. What is shocking is the blatancy of the spoof and its acceptance.
Much has been made of the neo-con exploitation of 9/11. Such discourse leaves the event itself in the shade, polishes it away, as attention is focused on the results. Conspiracy theorists go so far as to say that the event was engineered (by the Gvmt, or more largely by the powers that be) to obtain those very results (invasion of Afghanistan for a pipeline under the guise of chasing Binny, Patriot Act, etc.) – the atrocity becomes but a step in a wider plot to dominate the world, something like a ‘necessary evil’ in the minds of the powerful and corrupt who are at the helm.
The perpetrators of 9/11 are said to be a foreign power (Saudi, Israel, Mossad, Iraq), or crazed and unidentifiable, shadowy individuals (muslim terrorists – the left prefers this of course, blowback, see the infamous Chomsky), or possibly some evil internal cabal, with or without active Gvmt. involvement. The foreign; the weird; the powerful – the unknown.
The unknown perps leave the ‘old’ US – the image of a good, proud, rich, beautiful, fair country (as most US citizens see it) – intact.
It cannot be suggested that 9/11 was a uniqely American event, carried out by ordinary Americans (ones with money and long arms, to be sure!) That is unimaginable, that is what needs to be covered up. Internal disintegration is the number one nightmare of any country. Of its people. Invading Afgh. was a diversion. (Within this interpretation.)
Fascism is not really a philosophy, but a method for gaining power. That is why it has such a ‘centrist’ and posturing, shifting quality, why it transmutes and why everyone accuses everyone else of fascism. Criminal organisations and Mafya type groups (covert activities) are very poor at PR, at finding new adherents, etc. To maintain their troops they revert to a ‘family’, ‘blood brother’ style of management, locking them in in a cycle of dependence and loyalty (read those two words again!); their internal control procedures are a mixture of seduction (family) and violent, authoritarian coercion, including torture. When such groups go mainstream they have no politics, but must quickly find some. Only one model (pseudo-model) will suit. Yes.
What does all this have to do with Hitler? Nothing much.
This is just one POV, one aspect, other things could be said, but its getting toooo long.
Posted by: Blackie | Feb 13 2005 16:48 utc | 27
|