Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 19, 2005
“Outposts of Tyranny”

Yesterday, Dr Rice unveiled the new marketing name for the bad guys: they are, ta-dam, the outposts of tyranny and they include, alongside old-timers North Korea and Iran, 4 newbies: Cuba, Burma, Belarus and Zimbabwe. Didn’t she forget someone?

(and no, it’s not Syria, Pakistan, Uzbekistan)

Bush: (WaPo interview, 15 January 2005)

Well, we had an accountability moment, and that’s called the 2004 election. And the American people listened to different assessments made about what was taking place in Iraq, and they looked at the two candidates, and chose me

UK soldiers abused Iraqi detainees, court told (FT)

The British military has launched more than 100 investigations into the deaths and injuries of Iraqis in incidents that range from combat to detention to road accidents.

Evidence from major who gave order to ‘work them hard’ (Daily Telegraph (UK)

A courts martial of three soldiers, which has already seen shocking pictures of apparent Iraqi abuse, is set to hear from the man who allegedly gave the orders. Major Dan Taylor, of the 1 Bn The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers is to give evidence at the "Operation Ali Baba” courts martial in Osnabruck, Germany. He is alleged to have unlawfully ordered his soldiers to punish Iraqi civilians by "working them hard”.

Gonzales Says ’02 Policy on Detainees Doesn’t Bind C.I.A. (NYT, regarding "torture" policy)

Officers of the Central Intelligence Agency and other nonmilitary personnel fall outside the bounds of a 2002 directive issued by President Bush that pledged the humane treatment of prisoners in American custody, Alberto R. Gonzales, the White House counsel, said in documents released on Tuesday. In written responses to questions posed by senators as part of his confirmation for attorney general, Mr. Gonzales also said a separate Congressional ban on cruel, unusual and inhumane treatment had "a limited reach" and did not apply in all cases to "aliens overseas." That position has clear implications for prisoners held in American custody at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and in Iraq, legal analysts said.

Bush and Clinton told Congress Saddam was smuggling oil (FT)

The Clinton and Bush administrations not only knew but told the US Congress that Iraq was smuggling oil to Turkey and Jordan, and in both cases recommended continuing military and financial aid to countries seen as important allies. (…) … two letters sent by the State Department to Congress in 1998 and 2002 clearly show that successive US administrations knew of sanctions-busting and turned a blind eye to it. Some US lawmakers are now demanding that the US also hold itself to account for those decisions and not shift all the blame to the UN.

It must be wonderful to have that kind of self-righteousness, of moral clarity, of sense of destiny. Where could I get myself one of these? How do I get rid of my wimpy doubts? Of my morally flawed conscience? Of my betraying lust for understanding and compromise? Please help!

Comments

We’re Staying
Keep this in mind; Bush’s plan involves not leaving Iraq , perhaps ever:
Now comes a report in the New York Sun by Eli Lake revealing that the Pentagon is building a permanent military communications system in Iraq, a necessary foundation for any lasting troop presence. The new network will comprise twelve communications towers throughout Iraq, linking Camp Victory in Baghdad to other existing (and future) bases across the country, eventually connecting with US bases in Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Afghanistan.
“People need to get realistic and think in terms of our presence being in Iraq for a generation or until democratic stability in the region is reached,” Dewey Clarridge, the CIA’s former chief of Arab operations (and Iran-contra point man), told the Sun.
The fabled “exit strategy” may be not to exit. Thomas Donnelly, a defense specialist at the American Enterprise Institute, said the new communication system resembles those built in West Germany and the Balkans, places where American troops remain today. “The operational advantages of US bases in Iraq should be obvious for other power-projection missions in the region,” Donnelly wrote in an AEI policy paper .
Next time the Bush Administration hints at withdrawing troops, keep these grand plans in mind. (thanks for the above be to rorschach over at No capital blog)

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 19 2005 14:11 utc | 1

$cam have a look at what I posted on the Iraq thread.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Jan 19 2005 14:25 utc | 2

Listening to the Rice hearings this AM right off the bat she pulls the “national security” card and then follows with a fear based commerical that Iran is led by uncivilized people… remember it’s no longer propaganda, it’s Prop-Agenda (Neologism of the day: propagenda, as coined by Brian Eno in Zembla Magazine. Musing on how the Iraq War was marketed to the public, Eno detects a larger process behind the spin. ‘Propagenda is not so much the control of what we think, as the control of what we think about,’ he writes.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 19 2005 14:25 utc | 3

No one looks at the following point, because it seems at least oblique, if not simply OT, but I find it absolutely otherwise. It’s this: if you’re cool with the death penalty, then you’re bound to be cool–or cooler than I–with the idea that you should police, and indeed kill, leaders and governments that you disagree with. Being in the right entitles you to do things of this kind when you also believe in, and practice, the death penalty (further tracing of this proposition to be furnished on demand). Now I don’t know for a fact that Rice is cool with the death penalty, but I do know that she spent her formative years in Alabama, where the death penalty is as warmly embraced (mostly by Southern Baptists, who make up at least 65% of our voting population) as it is in Texas. From this perspective–unless, of course, I’m dead wrong about the lady–her appointment is not to be taken as a sign of our politcal well-being.

Posted by: alabama | Jan 19 2005 15:12 utc | 4

I there are “outposts of tyranny” you need a military:Bush at inauguration:

You have risked your lives in faraway mountains and arid deserts, in perilous skies and on the high seas, to defend liberty and to free those trapped by tyranny.

You, those who wear our uniform, have given much, and much more will be asked of you in the months and years ahead.

And the cause of freedom is in the best of hands — the hands of the United States Armed Forces.

Somehow I can think of much more qualified hands.

Posted by: b | Jan 19 2005 15:44 utc | 5

b,

And the cause of freedom is in the best of hands — the hands of the United States Armed Forces.

If you read Hersh’s article and see what has already happened with the transfer of enormous power to the Pentagon, your comment becomes even more chilling.

Posted by: dan of steele | Jan 19 2005 15:57 utc | 6

Two Asia Times articles
Israel in the Iran fray, too
Ukraine: Oil politics and a mockery of democracy

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Jan 19 2005 16:34 utc | 7

Caught the first few minutes of Rice-a-Roni this morning.
Shorter Chris Dodd: “Please discuss the outsourcing of torture to third countries.”
Shorter Condi: “We don’t do that. And considerations of Security preclude me from discussing in open session what I just said we don’t do”.
As we prepare to celebrate the fuhr… er, the president-reselect:

The nation’s 55th inaugural celebration began yesterday amid cold and blustery weather, with a salute to the military past and present, a private reception for deep-pocketed supporters of President Bush and a youth event at the D.C. Armory hosted by the president’s twin daughters and featuring teen-centric entertainers and a call to service for the country’s youth.

Ah, yes. Recruiting for the, well, you know. Don’t make me say it.

The forecast was welcome news to Stephen E. Sanders, who designs and sell fur coats. He had a booth set up at the Texas Fair & Market Place, part of the Texas State Society’s inaugural activities at the Wardman Park Marriott Hotel. He was selling everything from rabbit scarves for $99 to a golden Russian sable coat with a price tag of $75,000.
“You are going to see a lot of fur coats,” and not just because of the weather, he said. “This is a crowd that likes furs and wears them.”

How dost thee celebrate the “culture of life”? Let me count the ways, beginning with anal-probe electrocution.

Yesterday, the Secret Service, overseeing security for official inaugural events, cleared up its edict on crosses being included on a list of banned items, which had outraged some religious groups. Secret Service officials said they meant to ban only large cross “structures,” not crosses worn by individuals.

Today’s newspeak syllogism: “Cross Structures” are to Crosses as “WMD Program-Related Activities” are to…

Police closed streets around MCI Center to motor vehicles for the tribute, which lasted more than two hours. Those who attended were treated to a red, white and blue spectacle that wrapped President Bush in a warm mantle of support from the military.
Among them were 60 recuperating soldiers from Walter Reed Army Medical Center. “You watch the kids coming in here from Water Reed right now; they’re missing arms and legs. That’s what this is all about,” said Kurt Beckenhauer, museum program assistant with the Coast Guard, who watched as security guards ran metal detector wands over decorated war veterans.

Prosthetics of Mass Destruction?
Not to worry, though:
Missiles Deployed For Inauguration

The military has deployed anti-aircraft missiles within range of the Capitol as part of security enhancements for tomorrow’s presidential inauguration.
The missile deployment comes even though the FBI and Homeland Security Department concluded in a recent threat assessment that there is no credible information showing that terrorists have targeted inaugural events.
Army Avenger missile systems, a Humvee-mounted version of the Stinger anti-aircraft missile, were deployed in the weekend at several locations in the Washington area, including the northern tip of Bolling Air Force Base in Southeast.
“It is a NORAD deployment,” said Army Maj. Maria Quon, a spokeswoman for the North American Aerospace Defense Command, the joint U.S.-Canadian defense system developed during the Cold War.
Maj. Quon said that in addition to the Avengers, military and security agencies have deployed F-16, F-15 and support aircraft and radar and communications systems.
The combat jets are flying round-the-clock patrols to deal with any aircraft threats to tomorrow’s ceremonies. Additionally, the Air Force is flying E-3 airborne warning and control aircraft that are conducting surveillance missions and would help guide interceptor jets to targets.
The Avengers and other weapons are part of an “interagency multilayered air defense of the national capital region,” Maj. Quon said. She declined to comment on the locations of the weapons and equipment.
However, past deployments included Fort Lesley J. McNair in Southwest and the grounds of the Pentagon.
The Stinger missiles could be used against any aircraft that attempts to attack or strays into restricted airspace over the Washington area.
A seven-page Jan. 11 threat assessment concluded that “at this time, there is no credible information indicating that domestic or international terrorist groups are targeting the inauguration.”

Sooo… let’s see if I have this straight. PBD says “Bin Laden determined to attack inside US”. Response: Go on vacation. “no credible information indicating that domestic or international terrorist groups are targeting the inauguration”. Response: THREATCON DELTA!!!
“I do not avoid women, Mandrake. But I do deny them my essence”.

Posted by: OkieByAccident | Jan 19 2005 16:37 utc | 8

Where could I get myself one of these? How do I get rid of my wimpy doubts? Of my morally flawed conscience? Of my betraying lust for understanding and compromise?
Jérôme, you just need the right drink.
Here is how to prepare it:

1. Fill the pot with enough warm water so that the skein will float
2. Stir in the “Kool Aid” until it is dissolved
3. Add the yarn and stir gently
4. Put the pot on the stove and heat until the water is just below a simmer
5. Turn down the heat so that the pot doesn’t boil and keep the pot on the stove for 30 minutes. Stir gently from time to time.
6. When 30 minutes are up remove the pot from the stove and let it cool until the yarn can be handled.
7. Rinse by filling a dishpan with some detergent and water which is the same temperature as the yarn. Soak the yarn for 10 minutes. Lift it out and fill the pan with clean water which is the same temperature as the yarn. Soak the yarn for a minute or so, and repeat the rinsing step until no dye runs out.
8. Gently squeeze the excess water from the yarn.

9. Drink the kool-aid-water
Explanation:

drink the Kool-Aid v. To become a firm believer in something; to accept an argument or philosophy wholeheartedly or blindly.

Posted by: b | Jan 19 2005 16:38 utc | 9

OkieByAccident
Really great post

Posted by: slothrop | Jan 19 2005 16:56 utc | 10

This deployment of missiles is downright weird. What could this possibly be, if not just another stage-set for Bush’s psychodrama? Does he really believe, having said “bring it on,” that “they”‘re going to bring it on at his fancy dress ball? Does he actually think he counts at this point of the game? Well, for this non-spectator, the one sight worth seeing would be the spectacle of that memento mori, our very-skeletal Chief Justice, administering his oath of office ( “follow me to nowhere,” says the vacated look in his eyes).

Posted by: alabama | Jan 19 2005 17:30 utc | 11

CP – I will revert in more detail on the ATimes article on Ukraine but it is basically full of crap.

Posted by: Jérôme | Jan 19 2005 17:42 utc | 12

slothrop,
As I read the WP article, it was like a pinata – goodies just kept bursting forth. I didn’t even include this one:

There is another crowd, though. Protesters from an array of groups with a variety of causes said thousands of them will be on hand tomorrow. Yesterday, a federal judge turned down one antiwar group’s request to give them and members of the public more access to the inaugural parade route.
U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman said he saw some evidence that the Presidential Inaugural Committee, which is organizing events for the Bush administration, was being much more restrictive than in years past. Friedman said the protesters who sought the court’s emergency intervention had not proven they had a strong chance of winning their case on its merits, and it was potentially dangerous to alter inaugural plans and security policies 48 hours before the event.
“There’s the suggestion that the cards have been severely stacked against people — except those who could get tickets by being invited, and most people can’t,” Friedman said. He added: “At this late date, issuing an injunction would be averse to the public interest.”

This seemed like a first cousin to the theory that “once you’ve deployed 150,000 of your troops to the ME, you have to use them or else you lose credibiility”, or that, having preliminarily awarded Florida to Bush, deciding Bush v Gore in Gore’s favor would be prejudicial to the interests of Bush and the country.
I did take a small grain of solace when I read (forget where) that the denizens of Free Republic were also pissed at having been denied prime inaugural route real estste.
I am planning on observing “not a damn dime day”, though.

Posted by: OkieByAccident | Jan 19 2005 18:45 utc | 13

You can practically see the “TM” after these brand names that they keep trotting out, a new one every few months. The SF writers I enjoyed in the 70’s, if still living, must be reeling with disorientation and dismay as they see their weirdest dystopian fantasies coming to life: corporate culture bossing a militarised society, advertising hacks controlling the language of political discourse. “Rebranding” as a response to every possible event of State.
I’m kind of reeling myself.
Paxton, in an interesting footnote, refers to the historians’ nickname LTI for the grandiose, swaggering, ridiculous language of the Third Reich — lingua tertii imperii, the language of the third empire. A lot of the branding done by BushCo, to my ear, has eerie overtones of the same style: Homeland Security for example. Axis of Evil. Loyalty Day. And so on. Are we looking at LQI here? with a horrid, further banalisation from the influence of the marketing department?

Posted by: DeAnander | Jan 19 2005 18:50 utc | 14

@ DeAnander: “the grandiose, swaggering, ridiculous language of the Third Reich”
I’ve thought for some time now (four years?) that it’s like reading the text in a super-hero comic book. Shazzam!!!

Posted by: beq | Jan 19 2005 19:10 utc | 15

Who’s supposed to be on Billmon watch?

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Jan 19 2005 19:22 utc | 16

@beq — yeah. Biff! Bang! Pow!
do (most) men ever grow up? is the military life of the planet really about much more than a bunch of overgrown little boy-brats collecting Tonka Trucks, building forts and clubhouses, parading around in uniforms, playing with their secret decoder rings and (all too often) going off into Lord of the Flies mode and torturing anything they can get their hands on? it all seems so bloody childish sometimes — an evil, eerie kind of childishness. there are far more important things to do, things that desperately need doing — repairing some of the damage, for a start. but of course they refuse to clean their room. sigh. sorry, it’s an oversimplification of course, but Commander Codpiece is such a sad example of the type.

Posted by: DeAnander | Jan 19 2005 19:28 utc | 17

Billmon’s on a roll mon! this “compare and contrast” style with a few selected quotations, is brilliant.

Posted by: DeAnander | Jan 19 2005 19:29 utc | 18

Does anyone know if that Col. Ryan like surf? You know, like in “Hajjis don’t surf!”

Posted by: Clueless Joe | Jan 19 2005 19:43 utc | 19

@De,
Yes, the great dystopians. Philip K Dick, Pohl & Kornbluth… We’re almost there. I’ve been meaning to transfer the Annex SF thread to lespeakeasy, this might be a good time…

Posted by: OkieByAccident | Jan 19 2005 21:37 utc | 20

Don’t know if this has been posted yet, but here are more pictures from the Guardian
I have to say Blair’s performance at QT today was hipocrisy at its’ ugliest.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Jan 19 2005 22:00 utc | 21

Kill the Torture Story
There must be other forces at work here, Blair has called in another favour.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Jan 19 2005 22:08 utc | 22

Re:“understanding and compromise? Please help! “
I learned one important thing from posting at Slashdot.org . Slashdot has almost one million registered users commenting on topics/articles. Because of that, it’s almost ceartain that someone, anyone will disagree or won’t understand your own comment and reply to it with a flamebait, insult, etc. (It’s kind of like Godwin’s Law.)
The same with the Internet. More people making more websites rises the possibility that an extreme case will show up, even when it’s individual possiblity is tiny.
Example: Out there, in the internets, is a guy who will soon register a site called fuckantarctica.com , but he does not know it yet…
Damn it, if no one will, i’ll do it myself… Why? Because I can!

Posted by: MarcinGomulka | Jan 21 2005 1:30 utc | 23