Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 10, 2005
MoA 2005 Census Thread

Now that we are all back from our holidays, and that we have all been perked up by Billmon’s latest (see thread below), I’d like to organise a census of sorts to try to better understand who reads the site.

I’d like all readers to put one – and one only – comment in this thread with the number they are posting at (first comment will be “1”, second “2”, etc… just look at the number in the last available comment and add 1!). Post with your name if you don’t mind, post anonymously if don’t feel like leaving a name, but please don’t post more than once if you don’t leave a name, it would just waste the experiment for others.

“Count me in”

Comments

1

Posted by: Jérôme | Jan 10 2005 22:37 utc | 1

2

Posted by: biklett | Jan 10 2005 22:48 utc | 2

3

Posted by: b | Jan 10 2005 22:50 utc | 3

4

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Jan 10 2005 22:52 utc | 4

5

Posted by: DeAnander | Jan 10 2005 23:00 utc | 5

5.

Posted by: FlashHarry | Jan 10 2005 23:00 utc | 6

7

Posted by: OkieByAccident | Jan 10 2005 23:09 utc | 7

8

Posted by: beq | Jan 10 2005 23:20 utc | 8

9

Posted by: beq | Jan 10 2005 23:21 utc | 9

10

Posted by: fauxreal | Jan 10 2005 23:22 utc | 10

11

Posted by: ralphbon | Jan 10 2005 23:25 utc | 11

12

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jan 10 2005 23:38 utc | 12

13

Posted by: alabama | Jan 10 2005 23:47 utc | 13

14

Posted by: Pat | Jan 11 2005 0:05 utc | 14

14 (Darn! I wanted to be 13)

Posted by: Aigin | Jan 11 2005 0:05 utc | 15

15 (Pat beat me to 14)

Posted by: Aigin | Jan 11 2005 0:06 utc | 16

16

Posted by: titoo | Jan 11 2005 0:20 utc | 17

16

Posted by: lonesomeG | Jan 11 2005 0:21 utc | 18

17

Posted by: lonesomeG | Jan 11 2005 0:22 utc | 19

18

Posted by: teuton | Jan 11 2005 0:24 utc | 20

18

Posted by: rapt | Jan 11 2005 0:24 utc | 21

22
Because some are doubled up

Posted by: Tonic | Jan 11 2005 0:30 utc | 22

19

Posted by: Anonymous | Jan 11 2005 0:30 utc | 23

22

Posted by: manari | Jan 11 2005 0:39 utc | 24

23

Posted by: jonku | Jan 11 2005 0:54 utc | 25

24

Posted by: gmac | Jan 11 2005 0:59 utc | 26

25

Posted by: jdp | Jan 11 2005 1:15 utc | 27

26

Posted by: emereton | Jan 11 2005 1:18 utc | 28

27 (assuming the count hasn’t been screwed up earlier)

Posted by: Clueless Joe | Jan 11 2005 1:35 utc | 29

28

Posted by: anna missed | Jan 11 2005 1:40 utc | 30

29

Posted by: catlady | Jan 11 2005 1:49 utc | 31

30

Posted by: YY | Jan 11 2005 1:53 utc | 32

31

Posted by: annie | Jan 11 2005 2:04 utc | 33

32

Posted by: Anonymous | Jan 11 2005 2:07 utc | 34

33

Posted by: Anonymous | Jan 11 2005 2:16 utc | 35

34

Posted by: aw | Jan 11 2005 2:23 utc | 36

34

Posted by: conchita | Jan 11 2005 2:24 utc | 37

36

Posted by: brownhill | Jan 11 2005 2:42 utc | 38

37

Posted by: coral | Jan 11 2005 2:50 utc | 39

37

Posted by: SusanG | Jan 11 2005 2:50 utc | 40

Oops.
38

Posted by: SusanG | Jan 11 2005 2:51 utc | 41

41 (according to the front page counter), otherwise 39.

Posted by: Tom DC/VA | Jan 11 2005 2:53 utc | 42

42

Posted by: Kate_Storm | Jan 11 2005 2:55 utc | 43

43

Posted by: b real | Jan 11 2005 3:39 utc | 44

Wow! I didn’t know Billmon was still posting: best news of the new year.

Posted by: Brian Boru | Jan 11 2005 4:31 utc | 45

44

Posted by: PRob | Jan 11 2005 5:25 utc | 46

45

Posted by: Fran | Jan 11 2005 5:35 utc | 47

44
(I count Tom DC/VA as 39, which makes me 44.)

Posted by: Citizen | Jan 11 2005 5:39 utc | 48

Well, I’m 47 years old…..

Posted by: Malooga | Jan 11 2005 5:58 utc | 49

But by count I believe I’m 45.

Posted by: Malooga | Jan 11 2005 6:01 utc | 50

48
(approximately)

Posted by: mismn | Jan 11 2005 6:02 utc | 51

L

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Jan 11 2005 7:07 utc | 52

48 – I counted.

Posted by: stoy | Jan 11 2005 7:39 utc | 53

49 or IL or 110001

Posted by: dan of steele | Jan 11 2005 8:17 utc | 54

50!

Posted by: curious | Jan 11 2005 8:44 utc | 55

51

Posted by: Anonymous | Jan 11 2005 9:29 utc | 56

52> And thou, er, yep, strangeness.

Posted by: R | Jan 11 2005 9:46 utc | 57

53

Posted by: Colman | Jan 11 2005 10:10 utc | 58

54

Posted by: aemd | Jan 11 2005 10:26 utc | 59

55

Posted by: Hannah K. O’Luthon | Jan 11 2005 10:48 utc | 60

56

Posted by: onzaga | Jan 11 2005 11:21 utc | 61

57

Posted by: maxcrat | Jan 11 2005 12:00 utc | 62

58

Posted by: Anonymous | Jan 11 2005 12:02 utc | 63

59

Posted by: dk | Jan 11 2005 13:08 utc | 64

60

Posted by: ed_finnerty | Jan 11 2005 13:56 utc | 65

61

Posted by: Juannie | Jan 11 2005 15:17 utc | 66

62

Posted by: pedro | Jan 11 2005 15:19 utc | 67

63 (you’d think this would be simple)

Posted by: kat | Jan 11 2005 16:09 utc | 68

64

Posted by: mistah charley | Jan 11 2005 16:12 utc | 69

64

Posted by: Liz | Jan 11 2005 16:12 utc | 70

66 (Liz didn’t see mistah charley at 64)

Posted by: Thumb | Jan 11 2005 16:50 utc | 71

67, six-seven

Posted by: Blackie | Jan 11 2005 17:29 utc | 72

68

Posted by: Redcane | Jan 11 2005 18:15 utc | 73

Gee, ya left 69 for me?

Posted by: Serf in USA | Jan 11 2005 18:27 utc | 74

70
esme

Posted by: Anonymous | Jan 11 2005 18:30 utc | 75

71

Posted by: Jim S | Jan 11 2005 19:16 utc | 76

72

Posted by: swatbot | Jan 11 2005 19:38 utc | 77

73

Posted by: mats | Jan 11 2005 20:13 utc | 78

74

Posted by: selise | Jan 11 2005 20:20 utc | 79

75

Posted by: Anonymous | Jan 11 2005 20:47 utc | 80

76

Posted by: Mary | Jan 11 2005 21:22 utc | 81

77

Posted by: semper fubar | Jan 11 2005 21:51 utc | 82

78

Posted by: Scape | Jan 11 2005 22:01 utc | 83

79.

Posted by: Basharov | Jan 11 2005 22:39 utc | 84

according to the comments tab,I’m
85

Posted by: possum | Jan 11 2005 22:56 utc | 85

80

Posted by: terrorist lieberal craigb | Jan 11 2005 22:57 utc | 86

81

Posted by: emptywheel | Jan 11 2005 23:04 utc | 87

83…I think.

Posted by: hobbitess | Jan 11 2005 23:07 utc | 88

84…maybe

Posted by: mer | Jan 11 2005 23:18 utc | 89

85

Posted by: RossK | Jan 11 2005 23:36 utc | 90

85

Posted by: TR | Jan 11 2005 23:41 utc | 91

86, maybe.

Posted by: Donald Johnson | Jan 11 2005 23:49 utc | 92

87

Posted by: Ferdzy | Jan 12 2005 0:24 utc | 93

88

Posted by: Bea | Jan 12 2005 2:17 utc | 94

89

Posted by: Epim | Jan 12 2005 3:53 utc | 95

90

Posted by: sasando | Jan 12 2005 7:59 utc | 96

97

Posted by: Anonymous | Jan 12 2005 14:26 utc | 97

92

Posted by: cypher | Jan 12 2005 14:39 utc | 98

93

Posted by: pillbug | Jan 12 2005 15:54 utc | 99

According to previous comment: 94
According to comments link: 100!

Posted by: john theibault | Jan 12 2005 16:10 utc | 100