Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
December 16, 2004
Rumsfeld Execution Continues

William Kristol in WaPo:

Surely Don Rumsfeld is not the defense secretary Bush should want to have for the remainder of his second term.

Tom Donnelly:

Even long time supporters and transformation advocates have begun to recognize that Rumsfeld is now a large part of the problem.

Trent Lott, Loren B. Thompson, Susan Collins, John McCain and Chuck Hagel all call for Rumsfeld to be fired.
The White House, for now, defends Rumsfeld:

"The president believes Secretary Rumsfeld is doing a great job, and that’s why he asked him to continue serving during this time of war," spokesman Scott McClellan said.

Sure, when the National Guard needs to tripple the enlistment bonus, the Generals finally agree that Iraq insurgents grow ‘more effective’ and the Air Force starts flying around trucks because driving is too dangerous, there is some serious trouble.

But up-fitting a 6,000 pound vehicle, build for a possible 4,500 pound payload, with 4,000 pound of armour is not effective and more troops are also more targets. Like some on the right recognize, within his frame Rumsfeld is not THAT wrong on this issue.

My take on this, well deserved, assassination:

On one level Rumsfeld is in the crosshair because he doesn’t want the draft. Kristol and fellow neocons are on this level and they do need more troops to beat Iran’s defense and further their great Middle East plans.

On another level this is aiming at Bush himself. Because his career is over and he has not to campaign again he can now push for unpopular interior pet projects like abolishing Social Security and tilting the tax burden further to the low income side.

People in the House and Senate will have to campaign again and McCain and Hagel are dreaming of further career steps. They now have to show their might over the President and Rumsfeld is an easy surrogate target that will fall anyhow soon after the Iraqi election. Right now Don is already a lame duck.

Who will Cheney choose to replace him? Continuity speaks for Wolfowitz. He fits the neocon’s plans and, together with Cheney, was the only participant in the Project for the New American Century who is on the shortlist. He will agree on the draft and is no candidate for 2008.

Thus I expect a more hawkish policy at the Defense Department and more fights within the Republican tribe. Interesting constellations these are.

Comments

Testing the currents of multipolarity

Posted by: Anonymous | Dec 16 2004 23:29 utc | 1

and here’s another excellent asiatimes article, via antiwar.com:
http://atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FL16Ak01.html
here somebody from iran delineates a possible defense strategy against a US attack on iran.
@bernhard: i thought you had handed the blog over to jerome. in any case, keep the excellent articles coming, i’ll keep reading.

Posted by: name | Dec 16 2004 23:51 utc | 2

“But up-fitting a 6,000 pound vehicle, build for a possible 4,500 pound payload, with 4,000 pound of armour is not effective and more troops are also more targets. Like some on the right recognize, within his frame Rumsfeld is not THAT wrong on this issue.”
Rumsfeld sent these folks to war in crap like this. “You go to war with what you’ve got”–Yada, Yada, Yada.
These vehicles are being used in combat, quasi-combat roles for which they were not designed (local patrols, convoy participation), because of Rumsfeld’s and friends failure to plan for contingencies.
My limited experience with all this was leg infantry in the long ago. I utterly don’t understand most of what’s happening currently, other than to realize that we are in very deep voodoo.
For me the failure to be able to utterly control the stetch of road between Baghdad and the international airport speaks volumes.(doesn’t infantry, even armored infantry, ever dismount anymore?).
B, you have some recent and apparently continuous experience in armor.
How’d you like to ride seven miles in a Humvee?

Posted by: Slow Learner | Dec 17 2004 0:40 utc | 4

to what extent is the use of Hummers in Iraq now required as a marketing ploy to boost civvy Hummer sales in the US?

Posted by: DeAnander | Dec 17 2004 1:06 utc | 5

Oh Canada, you are looking might fine this decade, if you don’t mind me saying so.
Hummer, is that what Monica did to Bill?

Posted by: Stoy | Dec 17 2004 3:15 utc | 7

Wolfowitz.
Feh.
He’ll be worse than Rummy.
Canada is looking pretty good to me too.

Posted by: fourlegsgood | Dec 17 2004 3:19 utc | 8

Rumsfeld to personally sign all condolence letters

Posted by: Anonymous | Dec 17 2004 5:35 utc | 9

Details of Marines Mistreating Prisoners in Iraq Are Revealed
Marines in Iraq conducted mock executions of juvenile prisoners last year, burned and tortured other detainees with electrical shocks, and warned a Navy corpsman they would kill him if he treated any injured Iraqis, according to military documents made public Tuesday.
[Aren’t these the kind of things that President Bush used as a justification for the US invasion of Iraq? Does that mean other countries are justified if they invade the US? For the record, I do not advocate the invasion of the US. Only bringing GWB and his chums before an international court to face charges of war crimes.]

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Dec 17 2004 5:49 utc | 10

Well, I think I might come around to fall in love ( in a dark sort of way) with all this anti- Rumsfeld talk amongst the right, especially coming from the neo-cons themselves. It’s comforting to witness, that when push comes to shove, or more properly, when hunger comes to starvation, they’re quite willing to eat their own. I do’nt for a minute believe their indigestation originates from the most recent fallout about the armour, or the never ending abuse (torture) accumulations, the escalating casualities, or any of this — no, this is first and formost a failure to deliver the goods — or the pizza, while still hot. So, the excuses are at hand, the pie is cold, so lets eat. After all, everyone knows the commander in chief is only swayed by the condition of his gut, the order has been called in, and so what the fuck! America is hungry!

Posted by: anna missed | Dec 17 2004 9:12 utc | 11

Tom Donnelly:
Even long time supporters and transformation advocates have begun to recognize that Rumsfeld is now a large part of the problem.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Everclear produces the worst of hangovers.

Posted by: anna missed | Dec 17 2004 9:49 utc | 12

William Kristol in WaPo:
Surely Don Rumsfeld is not the defense secretary Bush should want to have for the remainder of his second term.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
But Zell Miller already has signed on to Fox.

Posted by: anna missed | Dec 17 2004 10:10 utc | 13

Trent Lott, Loren B. Thompson, Susan Collins, John McCain and Chuck Hagel all call for Rumsfeld to be fired. The White House, for now, defends Rumsfeld:
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Iraq
1. Failing to build a real international coalition prior to the Iraq invasion, forcing the US to shoulder the full cost and consequences of the war.
2. Approving the demobilization of the Iraqi Army in May, 2003 – bypassing the Joint Chiefs of Staff and reversing an earlier position, the President left hundreds of thousands of armed Iraqis disgruntled and unemployed, contributing significantly to the massive security problems American troops have faced during occupation.
3. Not equipping troops in Iraq with adequate body armor or armored HUMVEES.
4. Ignoring the advice Gen. Eric Shinseki regarding the need for more troops in Iraq – now Bush is belatedly adding troops, having allowed the security situation to deteriorate in exactly the way Shinseki said it would if there were not enough troops.
5. Ignoring plans drawn up by the Army War College and other war-planning agencies, which predicted most of the worst security and infrastructure problems America faced in the early days of the Iraq occupation.
6. Making a case for war which ignored intelligence that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.
7. Deriding “nation-building” during the 2000 debates, then engaging American troops in one of the most explicit instances of nation building in American history.
8. Predicting along with others in his administration that US troops would be greeted as liberators in Iraq.
9. Predicting Iraq would pay for its own reconstruction.
10. Wildly underestimating the cost of the war.
11. Trusting Ahmed Chalabi, who has dismissed faulty intelligence he provided the President as necessary for getting the Americans to topple Saddam.
12. Disbanding the Sunni Baathist managers responsible for Iraq’s water, electricity, sewer system and all the other critical parts of that country’s infrastructure.
13. Failing to give UN weapons inspectors enough time to certify if weapons existed in Iraq.
14. Including discredited intelligence concerning Nigerian Yellow Cake in his 2003 State of the Union.
15. Announcing that “major combat operations in Iraq have ended” aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln on May 1, 2003, below a “Mission Accomplished” banner – more U.S. soldiers have died in combat since Bush’s announcement than before it.
16. Awarding a multi-billion dollar contract to Halliburton in Iraq, which then repeatedly overcharged the government and served troops dirty food.
17. Refusing to cede any control of Post-invasion Iraq to the international community, meaning reconstruction has received limited aid from European allies or the U.N.
18. Failing to convince NATO allies why invading Iraq was important.
19. Having no real plan for the occupation of Iraq.
20. Limiting bidding on Iraq construction projects to “coalition partners,” unnecessarily alienating important allies France, Germany and Russia.
21. Diverting $700 million into Iraq invasion planning without informing Congress.
22. Shutting down an Iraqi newspaper for “inciting violence” – the move, which led in short order to street fighting in Fallujah, incited more violence than the newspaper ever had.
23. Telling Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan about plans to go to war with Iraq before Secretary of State Colin Powell.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
He’s gotta stay, allbeit a skelaton.

Posted by: anna missed | Dec 17 2004 10:27 utc | 14

R.I.P. Gary Webb — Unembedded Reporter
The finest journalist ever to get fired for telling the truth is dead at age 49. The official cause of death on the death certificate will be suicide. But, as we shall see, he had much help getting to that point. The story of the life and death of Gary Webb says much about the state of American politics and what passes as “journalism” in today’s America.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Dec 17 2004 10:38 utc | 15

Lets hope for political bolemia nervosa.

Posted by: anna missed | Dec 17 2004 10:39 utc | 16

When can we start calling it DoO?

Posted by: beq | Dec 17 2004 12:19 utc | 17

They’re all just trying to save their own sorry asses, and that soldier gave them the perfect opportunity to dump on Rumsfeld (not that he didn’t deserve it, but since when has that been the point for republicans?)
Of course Rumsfeld has done a deplorable job. It’s possible he’s ruined the military for a good long time. But really, what difference does it make who Bush has as SecDef? They’re not going to appoint someone better than Rumsfeld. First of all, what self-respecting person would take the job? Secondly, they’re won’t bother appointing someone who isn’t going to go along with their schemes. Sure, the next guy might make a lot of noise getting the vehicle armor issue solved, (so they can pretend to the public that they’re doing something positive for the troops) but at the end of the day, they’ll continue with their insane agenda.
Let’s not pretend for a moment that these Republicans have suddenly discovered a conscience, or that the veil has miraculously been lifted from their eyes. This is just the next step in the dance — a sop to the electorate.
I think our best hope is that Bush’s megalomania, having been unleashed from whatever constraints it had before, will bring them down sooner rather than later. And it won’t be pretty on the way down.
But in the meantime, Republicans are just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, in an effort to distract all the rest of us while they run for the lifeboats.

Posted by: semper fubar | Dec 17 2004 13:42 utc | 18

That sounds about right beq. Or they could revert to the War Department which is what it really is.

Posted by: dan of steele | Dec 17 2004 13:43 utc | 19

“But in the meantime, Republicans are just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, in an effort to distract all the rest of us while they run for the lifeboats.”
Luv that, fubar.
@d of s: It’s an Orwellish world, after all…

Posted by: beq | Dec 17 2004 13:58 utc | 20

@Semper Fu:
You got it.
A Republican with a conscience. Probably a cuddly little creature all in all.
Don’t think I’d venture to turn my back on it in a dark alley though.

Posted by: FlashHarry | Dec 17 2004 14:26 utc | 21

how long before someone files to declare the Fox network a terrorist organization? they’ve been spreading fud & terror to the public for years now, cheerleading war crimes & mass murder, and, let’s face it, zell miller is a darn scary-looking guy…
gotta fight pr w/ pr. armour-gate is only one weakspot. rummie is reportedly worth more than $100 million…couldn’t he personally help ensure that the army he offers the recruits is a bit closer to the one they expect? or is stan goff more worth listening to, when he said that bush & rumsfeld care about the troops in the same way that tyson cares about chicken?
rummie’s always been under fire. remember that he started out w/ a major problem on the inside b/c his push for a “capability-based strategy” from the decades-old “threat-based strategy” essentially painted all “basic assumptions that guided us grand strategy since 1946” as both wrong & incompetent.

Posted by: b real | Dec 17 2004 16:15 utc | 22

And flashharry – let’s also recall that these Republicans have had two freakin years to call Rumsfeld to task. These people have not been just silent, they actually supported and enabled this administration in its malfeasance. There was plenty of evidence about the lack of appropriate armor and equipment for the troops for months and months, and yet…silence from our lambs. Yet now they call for his head. And to add insult to it, the issue that finally got them crowing was the public relations disaster of “not supporting the troops.” Nevermind the more grievous crime of condoning torture and the abuses at Abu Ghraib. No, for THAT, he gets a pass from these lowlife politicians.
Remember all this when we get all soft and conciliatory and forgiving towards our new-found allies in the Republican party.

Posted by: semper fubar | Dec 17 2004 16:17 utc | 23

should have read “bush & rumsfeld care about the troops in the same way that tyson cares about chickens

Posted by: b real | Dec 17 2004 16:17 utc | 24

Or is it just a bunch of spoiled kids whining about a broken
toy?

Posted by: biklett | Dec 17 2004 16:45 utc | 25

Ages 3 and up. Don’t forget the batteries!

Posted by: biklett | Dec 17 2004 16:55 utc | 26

rearranging the lifeboats? hell, they’re just trying to distract us so’s we don’t notice they sold all the lifeboats a while ago — or chopped them up to fuel the grill in the 4-star restaurant onboard.

Posted by: DeAnander | Dec 17 2004 17:46 utc | 27

A quick snip from Cursor.org today

‘Torture begins at the top’ Joe Conason reviews recently released documents that he says are “creating an untenable situation” for Rumsfeld, who announced that he will begin personally signing condolence letters.
National Guard falls 10,000 short as recruiting slips, and a U.S. soldier is charged with having himself shot so he wouldn’t have to return to Iraq.

Well well well. That last bit sounds all too familiar.
And as for the first bit, when Rummie is sat down in a corner with his dunce’s cap on, to write over 100,000 letters of condolence to Iraqi families — then I’ll be impressed.

Posted by: DeAnander | Dec 17 2004 17:55 utc | 28

Looks like another presidential medal is being engraved for Rumsfeld.
The next guy will be someone who will approve the use of tactical nukes in the escalation of this war, and approve the reinstatement of the draft.
Biggy terra event coming soon.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Dec 17 2004 19:33 utc | 29

Sad day when Rummie, tightly clutching his Annie Leibowitz portrait, retires to the ranch he co-owns in Taos w/none other than Danny Rather.
I doubt Wolfie will replace him, as he has neither the interpersonal nor operational abilities. Brass would lock the doors to the Pentagon if they tried to stuff some NeoNut ideologue from the academy in there.
LAST BILL MOYERS TONIGHT. He’s focusing on the destruction of the x4th Estate. Sat. is Toss the TV day.

Posted by: jj | Dec 17 2004 19:36 utc | 30

W.House Gives Rumsfeld New Vote of Confidence

Posted by: b | Dec 17 2004 23:28 utc | 31

Iraq fears put pressure on Rumsfeld to quit

Posted by: Anonymous | Dec 18 2004 4:03 utc | 32

Can someone confirm that the issue of “boiler plate” for Hum Vees and our troup transports. Armour for U.S. Troops was not available, according to the Administration? Not too heavy but not available?
Not the issue of adding too much weight to vehicles which are under powered to carry such weight?
Could both arguments be flawed?
The engines in Hummers can pull or carry far more weight than the Defence Department claims, we are the “motorheads” of the world, if anyone can make and engines more powerful it is U.S.
And as for the lack of “boiler plate” for armor just visit any scrap yard and see what has happened to all the armor or boiler plate as it is referred to by those who make “fine steel.”
Before the closure of Geneva Steel in Utah county the
yards in and around the steel plant were full of “boiler plate” made prior to the Iraq war some of which was made for battle ships of WWII, but now all we find is skeltons of that same “armor plate” in scrap yard which the Defence Department deemed too expensive to use as armor, being that it makes such good lazer cut signs and decorations for the rich and famous.
The interesting question is where does the rolled steel, the boiler plate go from the scrap yard?
When offered 10 time the price of the scrap metal the scrap yards said that was not economical. Then where is that rolled steel go?
It is like the steel from the 3rd Ave “L” in NYC which when sold to Japan returned as aircraft carries to attack us at Pearl Harbor?
Should we expect chain link fencing made from tlhe
armor that was “not avilable” for our troups, made in China or Mexico?
When our Government “lies” and those lies cost us the lives of our children then maybe we should begin asking what are our childrens’ lives worth, and since
“lies” are opposed to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, then we the people should consider the same impeachment tried to remove President Clinton but not for “fooling around” but the lies told regarding the whole affair. Treason is far more offensive to this citizen than flavoring of cigars.
Should this administration be held accountable for every death of any U.S. Citizen which resulted from an economic excuse? And no death of any citizen of these United States can brushed under the carpet of
Patriotism, murder is murder, and lies are lies.
Just ask Donald Rumsfeld about Asparteme, and all that who have died from this deadly neurotoxin.
We the People are the United States of America and it is high time the Administration relizes that when workers understand they have been decieved they sometimes throw tea into Boston Harbor and we kick the bums out.
Just as first King George we colonists kicked out,
this “king” George could learn a lesson about the
Patriotism of We the People. That Patriotism is to
the Constitution not the President or any part of a government who would decieve us.
the Shadow
He who knows the evil that lurks in the hearts of men
and women, cha cha cha

Posted by: the Shadow | Aug 17 2005 17:34 utc | 33