
Time
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
December 19, 2004
Dump of the Year
Comments
Along with Hitler, Stalin (twice), and Khomenei. Posted by: Cloned Poster | Dec 19 2004 19:48 utc | 1 Does anyone happen to know whether Time is a money-losing publication? Posted by: alabama | Dec 19 2004 21:44 utc | 2 alabama, Posted by: SusanG | Dec 19 2004 22:55 utc | 3 Thank you, SusanG. Numbers are hard to find, especially in the Time-Warner Annual Report, where everything’s blended. Posted by: alabama | Dec 19 2004 23:24 utc | 4 well, in terms of impact, i agree with time that bush has made the greatest impact — not of the positive sort, of course. for me, the last four years have been defined by him and his hideous policies. i’d guess the same is true for all of you- who else, outside of your own circle of friends and family, has consumed more of your energy and attention? Posted by: semper fubar | Dec 20 2004 0:15 utc | 5 @semper fubar Posted by: DM | Dec 20 2004 0:32 utc | 6 alabama, Posted by: SusanG | Dec 20 2004 0:46 utc | 7 I haven’t read the story yet, but i’m sure the sycophants in the press will have their head shoved so far up Bushie and companies ass that it will take ten years to wash the stink off. Posted by: jdp | Dec 20 2004 2:24 utc | 8 @DM Posted by: A swedish kind of death | Dec 20 2004 2:26 utc | 9 time is a republican publication. after the bicentenial they has a photo symposium of couples of the century.gilbert and sullivan, hepburn and tracy, of course george and laura had a big glossy shot. 5 pages into it in the right hand corner, less than quarter page was a shot of clinton and monica. time is full of shit. they lure you into thinking they are non partisan. a wolf in sheep’s clothing Posted by: annie | Dec 20 2004 8:59 utc | 11 One of the family stories that has made leery of the mainstream media all my life is this: Posted by: Ferdzy | Dec 20 2004 20:23 utc | 12 Because Time had a wiseass knowitall attitude in the 60s, I opted for Newsweek for awhile until it too revealed itself as a house organ. From that point it was “no news is good news” for me until about 2002 when it became obvious that the govt was in criminal hands and I felt it was dangerous to remain clueless. Posted by: rapt | Dec 20 2004 22:23 utc | 13 When my ex-husband was in college in the late 1960’s we subscribed to Time, Newsweek, and US News & World Report for use in some of his courses. We quickly discovered that both Time and Newsweek were full of trivial trash, and only USN&WR contained any solid, useful material. Now, of course, my current husband and I must rely totally on non-US media and other sources found on the Internet (many through blogs like MoA) to know what’s going on in the world. Edward R. Murrow and the other great newsmen and journalists of another era must be whirling in their coffins. Posted by: hobbitess | Dec 20 2004 23:00 utc | 14 Time is the label on one of the stops of the Mighty Wulrlitzer… Posted by: DeAnander | Dec 20 2004 23:23 utc | 15 I guess TIME didn’t get the memo:: Posted by: conchita | Dec 20 2004 23:26 utc | 17 I bet Bush hasn’t just ordered these tortures, he’s also insisted on reviewing detailed accounts of their execution, because he’s a sadist who needs to hurt people in order to feel good, and quite concretely so…..And since every sadist is also a masochist, who, might we ask, is putting the screws to Bush? I’m prepared to guess about this, and my speculation shouldn’t surprise anyone. I’ll bet it’s those two or three Texas men–Evans and Bartlett to start with–who made the man quit drinking in 1986, and have never left his side since that time. They pray together everyday, swearing they feel just fine. But Bush, the dry drunk, doesn’t feel fine at all. He hasn’t felt fine since 1986–except, perhaps, for those moments when he gets to read some vivid accounts filed by those loyal torturers in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. Posted by: alabama | Dec 21 2004 1:27 utc | 18 @Ferdzy: Posted by: FlashHarry | Dec 21 2004 3:13 utc | 19 |
||