Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 6, 2004
Self-Destructive Behavior

picture by beq

Texas Sex-Ed Texts Barely Mention Contraceptives

The board approve language saying: "Marriage is a life-long union between a husband and wife."

The board rejected a proposal from Leo asking for language saying: "homosexuals, lesbians and bisexuals as a group are more prone to self-destructive behavior like depression, illegal drug use and suicide."

beq

Click on image to enlarge (70k)

Title: View of Mount Fuji
Artist: beq
Medium: Acrylic Canvas

Comments

another picture.
What it feels like, now.

Posted by: slothrop | Nov 6 2004 17:54 utc | 1

I keep listening, obsessively, to Neil Young’s Sleeps with Angels. …Somewhere, somewhere. I’ve got to get somewhere. It’s not too late, it’s not too late….
Western Hero- Neil Young
Sure enough, he was a western hero…
And on the shores of Normandy
He fought for you, he fought for me
Across the land and on the sea
But now he’s just a memory.
And in the distance, the rocket’s red glare
The bombs burst in the air
This time we’re never going back.
Through the years he changed somehow
He’s different now
He’s different now
Open Fire, here comes the western hero
Standing there, big money in his hand
Sure enough, he was a western hero.
Sure enough

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 6 2004 19:03 utc | 2

Religion or now ‘values’ and ‘decency’ as a stick to keep the lower classes in their place.
The upper classes never pay any attention to garbage like that – marriage a lifelong union between a man and a woman? Don’t make me laugh.
It is dangerous because:
a) it ignores the real suffering (and dollar cost) such precepts create. (E.g. Aids, overburdened single mothers, future delinquents, a long list..)
b) it reinforces repression and punishment – all kinds or ordinary people become targets for ostracism (at best) or elimination (at worst.)
b) it creates a world where public discourse and public morals are fake and not followed in private, a schism where nothing social of note can be accomplished.
c) it kills parts of medical science and social science.
Those are just the short-term effects.
In today’s landscape c) is no longer an issue. US elites know perfectly well that they can and will obtain amusement, medical care, artistic experiences, outside their own country. It will be cheaper that way.
It is not self-destructive behavior. It is perfectly rational self-serving behavior.
The Ms. Leo linked to hobnobs with Repubs. and participates in the management of a lot of money. She is -one may imagine- divorced, on the pill, and extremely fond of her homosexual sister. She gets a thrill -and signals her upperclass status- by hypocritically mouthing values -rules – that are supposed to regulate the lives of people who are less worthy (less pretty, less rich, less ambitious, less clever) than her sacred, precious self.

Posted by: Blackie | Nov 6 2004 19:04 utc | 3

Nothing new here folks. Read any lit or scholarship about the heyday of the British Empire — say 1870’s through 1925 or so. All same there: hegemonic churches controlling the lower classes, draconian punitive legal system, labour savagely repressed, vicious institutionalised homophobia and misogyny, propery and real wealth concentrated in the hands of a tiny elite, real wages low, poverty epidemic, medical care available only to the privileged few, etc etc. What drives me mad is that we’ve been here before and we know what it was like and it was Nasty. It was depressing and Nasty and scary and lots of people died and/or lived lives of misery, want, and fear. My grandparents lived through the end of the period; the chain of oral tradition is still unbroken.
We know — as surely as we know that hegemonic totalitarian State communism failed — that punitive conformist Church-cultist social-darwinist laissez-faire Edwardian imperial capitalism failed. We’ve tried it and it failed, OK?
Oh criminy. I thought one thing that distinguished the primates was superior learning behaviour.

Posted by: DeAnander | Nov 6 2004 19:20 utc | 4

PS rush out and rent “The Magdalene Sisters” on DVD. watch it, pay attention to it, watch to the interviews in the Extra Features with the real women on whose lives it was based.

Posted by: DeAnander | Nov 6 2004 19:20 utc | 5

The Magdalene Sisters
My grandmother (on my mothers side) suffered because of the Church also.
She got post-natal depression after the birth of her last child (1935) and was shipped off to an institution, my mother was three. Her sister moved in with my grandfather to look after the young family……… and I guess whatever else.
My grandmother was a very proud woman………. she recovered but refused to come out of the institution and stayed there as an unpaid worker/carer/patient until she died in the mid 70’s.
Fuck those Parish Priests and Bishops. (And yes; the Brits funded them during the 600 year occupation to keep the sheep catholics in line).
Her local church was built 2 years after the great Famine………. Cobh Cathedral……… probably where many a prayer was said by immigrants before they left for America.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Nov 6 2004 20:37 utc | 6

Fafnir interview on the self-distruction of religion.

Posted by: b | Nov 6 2004 20:46 utc | 7

The Magdalene Laundries
Joni’s song lyrics: The Magdalene Laundries of the “Turbulent Indigo” album.

Posted by: Kate_Storm | Nov 6 2004 20:47 utc | 8

Just sent this email to the BBC
Subject: Get Real BBC 5Live News
To: weekendnews@bbc.co.uk
Today a Marine Colonel Gary Brandl of the United States Marine Corps commented:
“The enemy has a face. It is Satan’s. He is in Fallujah, and we are going to destroy him.”
Source: http://scotlandtoday.scottishtv.co.uk/content/default.asp?page=s1_1_1&newsid=5674
You have spent an hour talking about a train crash which there is one person dead and 24 walking wounded.
Meanwhile, the Marines, in Britain’s name also are attacking Fallujah.
I despair of the once great BBC.
Cloned Poster

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Nov 6 2004 20:54 utc | 9

This afternoon in the skies over Manhattan three small planes towed banners reading:
WHAT YOU FEAR OVERTAKES YOU
SLOPPY THINKING GETS WORSE OVER TIME
YOU LIVE THE SURPRISE RESULTS OF OLD PLANS
Brought tears to my eyes. Have no idea who was responsible, but have to give credit and thanks to someone for reaching beyond the media and getting the message out there.
While I recognize that there is not yet sufficient hard evidence to support it, I am not yet convinced that this election was not stolen.

Posted by: conchita | Nov 6 2004 22:21 utc | 10

Choncita
You probably missed the fourth plane……. Bill Clinton was “RESULTS OF OLD PLANS”
Is that your point?

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Nov 6 2004 22:33 utc | 11

Cloned Poster, hardly. But perhaps I missed something there?

Posted by: conchita | Nov 6 2004 23:04 utc | 12

Choncita………… everybody is missing my point tonight………. I better go to bed.

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Nov 6 2004 23:31 utc | 13

More like old plans dating back to Vietnam, the hated counterculture, and through the Reagan and Bush, the Poppy administration, CP.

Posted by: Kate_Storm | Nov 7 2004 0:52 utc | 14

Quote:
Nothing new here folks. Read any lit or scholarship about the heyday of the British Empire — say 1870’s through 1925 or so.
——
Please remind me of the case where anybody succeeded to turn back wheel of the time in a long run…but yes they can make big mess trying it…

Posted by: vbo | Nov 7 2004 1:05 utc | 15

Yes, we’ve been here and done this before with horrible results. This is one of the repetitive thought cycles that has been driving me crazy lately. I remember in my idealistic youth thinking — after we had finally left Viet Nam — “we’ll never do anything so stupid again.”

Posted by: maxcrat | Nov 7 2004 1:09 utc | 16

British helped by the church in Ireland? Not surprising. Actually, the Ottomans and the Orthodox clergy were working hand in hand to keep the Greek populace as a peaceful and obedient slave. The Orthodox prisest basically collaborated and sold out their own so that they could have some local influence and would be the only native power the Greeks would ever see. This also worked quite well since the same clergy managed to portray itself as the champion of the independantist cause.

Posted by: Clueless Joe | Nov 7 2004 3:56 utc | 17

speaking of the morality of whores and thieves…
I took my kids to see a production of The Threepenny Opera tonight by a company that also does work from Lorca, among others, on a regular basis.
Wished all the denizens of the Moon could have been there too.
The audience was with them.
On another note, before the election I wrote a paper about The Handmaids Tale and talked about issues of concern vis a vis Diebold, the Constitution Restoration Act, “faith-based” programs…and the professor excoriated me for being a “drama queen,” gave me the worst grade I’ve ever received for a paper, and told me that my concerns were totally without merit. Although the question was: “What elements do you see in today’s society that reflect The Handmaids Tale,” I went too far afield in my answer by noting what I thought were those concerns. The class itself is, for me, a part of the b.s. that I am forced to go through because of the one credit I left undone long ago and am now having to make up for with twenty credits…long story…but maybe I’ve become dumber since I attended this same university ten years ago.
Of course, this is also a university that was very influential during the Reagan administration vis a vis Russian policy and when I disagreed that Reagan had single-handedly brought down the Soviet Union, that was also not acceptable.
Daniel Pipes has been here for speeches too, and we have Horowitz’s campus police operation going too.
If you’re on campus now, compared to ten years ago, the difference is startling, as far as the presence of student soldiers who have four hours notice for call-up, the increase in very, very conservative positions among students, and their willingness to accept what they are told by the govt.
I read not too long ago that this generation has never known anything but conservative propaganda, since they were born during Reagan, lived to hear Clinton say “the era of big government is over,” and now hear that social security is for chumps.
I think anyone who is hoping for a progressive revival is engaging in wishful thinking. Of course, I could be wrong, because I often am wrong.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 7 2004 4:33 utc | 18

@ fauxreal
I was moved by your college experince in the above post, I too went into college with lots of life experince @ 38 and many ideas in my head. Now that I’m a 40 yr old non -traditional senior, I am convinced that the only purpose of education is to make money.Sad, thirst for knowledge has given way to market place mentality. It’s sickening, but not as sickening as trying to hold an intelligent conversation w/the kids (freshmen) these days… if it’s not about shopping hiphop or sports
it’s not talked about with any depth…
What I didn’t learn in college

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Nov 7 2004 11:59 utc | 19

Funny how over at kos, people are so afraid to call the selection fraud. well, These people are sure calling it fraud!

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Nov 7 2004 12:25 utc | 20

Quote from your article b:
Surveys indicate a wide majority of U.S. parents support a strong abstinence message to teens in sex education.
***
Those are mums who voted for Bush this time I suppose…quick fix in moral values that diminished under their watch…how divine….Well things are not looking great with today youngsters in many ways I have to admit…Who ever have children probably knows they can be unbearable at some points. But there is NO ONE to fix it but us PARENTS…all tho it sound great to shift responsibilities elsewhere. It has to be done against all odds…cause simply society (outside world) has great chunk of influence and it’s working against us often.Still…
Again this is going to cost a lot cause simply going backwards in time is not going to work…not to be solution.

Posted by: vbo | Nov 7 2004 12:45 utc | 21

Uncle Scam- I do not believe the only purpose of education is to make money. That’s why I don’t have much of it…
…and that’s why I’m returning to get a masters that is “functional” rather than purely intellectual.
The class is no big deal, ultimately. It’s part of the extortion money I’m paying for not following the rules. I tried to argue with more than one dean that the two foreign languages I studied could be substituted for the one (math) that I didn’t. But I lost the argument. At this point, it honestly doesn’t matter WHAT courses I take, as long as they’re not in my previous major, but instead matters only that I take something, because I switched colleges. I’m just serving some time for not following the rules, even tho, when I was a student earlier, I received all kinds of awards for my scholarship. But that was then, this is now.
The paper moment was interesting because I cited The New Yorker, Harpers, Vanity Fair, Reason, Congressional Bills, The Atlanta Journal Constitution, and The Washington Post…not exactly non-mainstream sources…I didn’t say that we should all buy gold and head for the hills…I did say that I would tend to think the power elite would stop such fanaticism, but I also said that there are examples of societies falling to such extremists.
I was never a “conspiracy theorist” until the 2000 election, but my insistence that Bush conspired with Jeb to steal that one got me labeled as such. Now it seems I’ve joined the ranks of the dispossessed.
I no longer care to know, even, if this election was stolen. The Democratic Party doesn’t care, so why should I?
The open willingness to even consider a corrupt heart in the body politic is directly and inversely proportionate to your investment and incorporation into its structures, seems to me.
Maybe I’m joining the ranks of Pat’s libertarians because I no longer think that government offers any solutions, nor do I think it is valid or meaninful for my life.
It will be interesting to watch events unfold over the next four years. I expect to see lots of sexual scandal because of the religious bent, and also lots of financial scandal, because of the corporate bent. I do not expect any of these things to have any consequence for those in power because there is no check or balance available in any of the three branches of govt.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 7 2004 14:55 utc | 22

fauxreal: Maybe I’m joining the ranks of Pat’s libertarians because I no longer think that government offers any solutions, nor do I think it is valid or meaninful for my life.
😉 For the reasons you cited, you might choose anarchism rather than libertarianism… a libertarian accepts the presence/existence of government. Not so with the anarchist, who sees no legitimacy in any form of hierachical ruling system.
Just an errant Sunday morning thought…

Posted by: Kate_Storm | Nov 7 2004 15:39 utc | 23

actually, I’m returning to my older position and I don’t give a fuck anymore. I was a bit sarcastic about the libertarian comment.
I’m not a libertarian. I’m not an anarchist. I do believe that govt offers solutions, but I am in a minority in my nation and so it doesn’t matter what I think, so why should I waste my time and energy?
the conservatives have set up the banquet table for themselves and they are about to gorge on the stupidity of the majority of Americans who think it is more important to deny others things they themselves are not forced to participate in, rather than to vote from their economic self-interest.
I was at a school event for one of my kids two days after the election when I heard a dad and his (about ten year old) son talking. The son was gleeful about abolishing social security.
the son went on to talk about the great military hardware that could, and this is as exact a quote as I can do, “kill people without even having to do anything.” His dad listened and occasionally remarked about this technology versus the other when killing people.
the boy said “people.” Killing people. nothing wrong with gleeful delight in killing people, undifferentiated.
his mother sat beside him and saw that I was staring at her son as though he were the spawn of satan.
Those people are not people I claim as part of my own.
I feel like I live in this country as an accident of birth. Hopefully I will be able to chose something different in a year or so by getting a job somewhere else.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 7 2004 16:02 utc | 24

Did anybody read the link I posted?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Nov 7 2004 17:10 utc | 25

yes

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 7 2004 17:24 utc | 26

fauxreal, you missed my point,I wasn’t saying that the only reason to go to college, (for moi, anyway) was to make money,I was lamenting the sorry state of our education system hence the posted link that no seems to have read… ;-(

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Nov 7 2004 17:28 utc | 27

I don’t give a fuck anymore
Oh brother.
This talk of ‘leaving’ is also revolting. I understand the compulsion to resign when defeat is perceived. But such maudlin retreat is so, well, ‘liberal.’
“Anyone of our generation who feels and understands the historical moment in which he exists in this world, not as mere words, but as a battle, cannot renounce the study and the practice of the mechanism through which things (and conditions) and the masses interact” (Walter Benjamin, Letters, 300).
Even with the absence of any immediate political goals, action is not made irrelevant.

Posted by: slothrop | Nov 7 2004 17:41 utc | 28

Uncle- yes, I acknowledge that point, too. I read your links. I am aware of the thesis that the educational movement that started back at the turn of the century was useful, in part, to train young immigrants to sit and perform repetitive tasks in order to train them to be reliable workers, and to teach them other American values. There were positive reasons for this system as well, though, because they kept children out of factories until they were a little older.
The university system in the U.S. is subsidized by undergraduates, grad student teaching assistants and research grants. I cannot tell you how many “sixties radicals” I’ve heard who ruefully noted that they were (this was a decade ago) subsisting on grants from defense contractors and pharmaceutical companies. In order to receive tenure at a major research university, however, you must compete for those grants, and win some of them.
A grad student was talking about how “crazy” the professor for whom she is supplying very, very cheap labor would tell her that in the UK, her education would be subsidized, instead of the other way around (he’s not an American) as though that were a good thing. She thought he was crazy to think she shouldn’t work for him without having any sort of labor representation, etc.
Staff at the University do not make starting salary wages for a family and have to travel to another city for medical care because they have a “second tier” health care source. But unions are bad.
Slothrop, I was married to someone from another country, most likely somewhat in part because I have, in general, felt alienated from my own since I was 12 years old. I’ve been a very private person for most of my life, unlike the blathering I’m doing now.
Yes, I’m maudlin. I’m watching “Cradle Will Rock.” I’m a prissy, sissy female but I don’t like bodice rippers or chick flicks, so I’m also alienated from my most of my gender.
some argue that life is one long existential crisis and you have to make, as in create, meaning with each new phase of your experience. that’s what I’m trying to do now. I find no meaning in attachment to the DNC, who will most likely put forth a candidate in 2008 like Evan Bayh.
No thanks.
On the other hand, I’m not a “hippie” or a “radical” or a marxist or a darwinian capitalist or a religious person or any other “ist” I can think of, either.
I don’t trust systems or all-encompassing theories for anything, so as I said, I’ll go back to my previous position and watch the train wreck from a distance.
If that’s terrible, so be it.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 7 2004 19:04 utc | 29

@ fauxreal: It’s soon yet. I think good things happened and there is some focus. Think of what Michael Moore accomplished. Let’s pay attention and back each other up. Kerry won just as Gore did. The media, the “voting”; let’s concentrate. It will be worth it.

Posted by: beq | Nov 7 2004 21:33 utc | 30

vbo: I tend to think that in most cases, it’s not the kids who really need to be fixed, it’s the parents.

Posted by: Clueless Joe | Nov 8 2004 2:22 utc | 31

more on the vote

Posted by: annie | Nov 8 2004 2:34 utc | 32

Quote:
vbo: I tend to think that in most cases, it’s not the kids who really need to be fixed, it’s the parents.
***
Yap…

Posted by: vbo | Nov 8 2004 5:24 utc | 33

Fauxreal I understand how you feel…totally…
I couldn’t identify with about half of my nation and their views of our wars in 90-ies, too…
I am going back now for vacation and am not sure what I am to find there in terms of what people think and feel about it years later…I do not really hope to find big changes all tho they may realized how wrong it was in terms of us not being able to fight USA and win…but I may not find many changes in terms of “our right” to use what ever force we find necessary…etc.
On the other hand Bush pissed of Greeks by recognizing EX YU republic of Macedonia simply as Macedonia and it looks like he did promise not to let Kosovo become independent so they may even find him very useful for our tasks…that’s all that matters I suppose…Not that they are not aware of who is Bushco and what their mission is all about…But they tried to fight an Empire and found it’s hard…Can’t blame them…

Posted by: vbo | Nov 8 2004 5:43 utc | 34

And speaking of self-destructive behaviour:
Ground Zero suicide inspired by election
Nov. 7, 2004
NEW YORK (AP) — A 25-year-old man from Georgia who was apparently distraught over President Bush’s re-election shot and killed himself at ground zero. Andrew Veal’s body was found Saturday morning inside the off-limits site, said Steve Coleman, a spokesman for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. A shotgun was found nearby, but no suicide note was found, Coleman said.
Veal’s mother said her son was upset about the result of the presidential election and had driven to New York, Gus Danese, president of the Port Authority Police Benevolent Association, told The New York Times in Sunday’s editions.

From salon.com Nov 7, I don’t have premium access so cannot read the whole story. Who knows. Maybe he was gay and had dreams of marrying his partner… Maybe he didn’t want to be drafted… Maybe he just felt the despair and dread that several of us here have articulated, and couldn’t live with it.

Posted by: DeAnander | Nov 8 2004 17:59 utc | 35

Ugh. I wish someone would create a website putting all these hypocritic bastards in the public eye (kind of like the “chickenhawks” database), so that a true measure of “christian values” is out there for all to see. I thing “Hypocrisy Now” would be a catchy site name.
Here’s a nice one about Roberta Combs (president of the Christian Coalition), helping her daughter in a nasty divorce – breaking a prenup, trying to entrap the father in a sex sting, and attempting to get him to waive all visitation rights.
http://us.altnews.com.au/nuke/article.php?sid=6840
This from a woman who is willing to speak on pro-family values for a modest fee of $12,500-17,500 per engagement.
http://www.nashspeakers.com/cgi-bin/speakers/display.pl?speaker=530
Nauseating

Posted by: ego | Nov 8 2004 21:14 utc | 36

sorry … bad linking. Those would be:
Here and
here

Posted by: ego | Nov 8 2004 21:17 utc | 37

beq,
Thanks for a good belly laugh at the Japanese title of your painting, I needed that.
b,
thanks for recommending Fafnir. I’d seen it once before, but this time I was crying and laughing. Thanks for the nutrition.

Posted by: Citizen | Nov 9 2004 7:01 utc | 38

beq,
Thanks for a good belly laugh at the Japanese title of your painting, I needed that.
b,
thanks for recommending Fafnir. I’d seen it once before, but this time I was crying and laughing. Thanks for the nutrition.

Posted by: Citizen | Nov 9 2004 7:01 utc | 39

@ Citizen: Liked the title? Then you will really enjoy the tag; it says “Full Moon”. 😉

Posted by: beq | Nov 9 2004 11:50 utc | 40