news, views, opinions …
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
November 18, 2004
Off Topic Open Thread
news, views, opinions …
Comments
Citibank and US embassy Posted by: b | Nov 18 2004 20:13 utc | 1 Well, in the meantime, we have a new European Commission, with some decent legitimacy (voted in 449 to 149, with 82 abstaining), after having given a boost to the European Parliament, which asked for, and obtained, the change of 3 of the commissioners. New democratic oversight, and new legitimacy for the institutions which best embody the future of Europe (and which, in the case of the Parliament, is located less than 500m from where i was born, which is of course a lot more important…). The really interesting thing is that the European parliament voted on party lines (the 6 main groups are the euroskeptics/nationalists, conservatives, liberals, socialists, greens and communists, with the conservatives and socialists the two largest by far, but neither having an outright majority), and NOT on national lines, and that the Parliament and the Commission imposed the changes to commissioners against the will of the member states. Posted by: Anonymous | Nov 18 2004 20:50 utc | 3 Iraq war topping $5.8 billion a month Posted by: b | Nov 18 2004 22:25 utc | 4 b Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 18 2004 22:46 utc | 5 @r’giap – I’m living in Hamburg in a very pretty appartment house built 1896. The street to the left has many such house, the street to the right has quite ugly houses from the 1960s. Walking around Hamburg you can see were the bombs have hit. Just look at the architecture style – sometimes just one house in a row, sometimes whole quarters. The scars are everywhere. 50,000 civilians dead in two bombing nights in Hamburg, but the industry losses were sparce – they bombed the harbour and the factories only by mistake. Posted by: b | Nov 18 2004 23:04 utc | 6 p://www.commondreams.org/views04/1118-33.htm Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 18 2004 23:20 utc | 8 b Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 19 2004 1:00 utc | 9 speaking of Greece, i was very much surprised to learn that they are much more anti-American than the French. In the recent EU study ca. 80% of Greeks (highest rate in the EU) said that the US is the main threat to peace in the world. Only ca. 50% of Frenchmen did so. Posted by: MarcinGomulka | Nov 19 2004 1:08 utc | 10 marcin Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 19 2004 1:11 utc | 11 I´m in a good mood today. The winter´s first snow has arrived to me here in Sweden. Posted by: A swedish kind of death | Nov 19 2004 2:10 utc | 12 si au bout de la nuit de l’histoire Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 19 2004 2:11 utc | 13 US Economic success for Afghanistan. Posted by: DM | Nov 19 2004 3:20 utc | 15 @ beq Posted by: A swedish kind of death | Nov 19 2004 3:24 utc | 16 Nietzsche, Turin, 1988, during convalescence: Posted by: slothrop | Nov 19 2004 4:38 utc | 17 Often, we wonder, “what to do?” Not: “Do I dare…” But, merely, what can I do? Posted by: slothrop | Nov 19 2004 4:44 utc | 18 “Carefree, mocking and violent: thus wisdom wants us. She is a woman, and loves only a warrior, always.” Posted by: alabama | Nov 19 2004 6:03 utc | 19 I am not to keen about Chirac in general, but for international politics I am glad he is there to speak out against the imperial Bush/Blair politics.
I think he is right, this is often the problem. Not wanting to bring democracy to other countries, but American kind of democracy. I believe democracy has many faces and all are of value. Posted by: Fran | Nov 19 2004 7:00 utc | 20 Swedish Posted by: anna missed | Nov 19 2004 7:08 utc | 21 “Carefree, mocking and violent: thus wisdom wants us. She is a woman, and loves only a warrior, always.” Fran, Posted by: MarcinGomulka | Nov 19 2004 15:49 utc | 23 Swedish, Posted by: MarcinGomulka | Nov 19 2004 16:05 utc | 24 Commons motion to impeach Blair gets go-ahead Posted by: DM | Nov 19 2004 22:08 utc | 25 DM Posted by: Cloned Poster | Nov 19 2004 23:10 utc | 27 Nice to see that there are also hopefull things happening in this world. This is at least a good beginning, the rest needs to be seen.
I can understand why Putin is glad that Bush was ‘elected’, because whatever he does, compared to Bush, his image can only improve. Posted by: Fran | Nov 20 2004 8:11 utc | 28 Totaly OT and stupit and maybe down soon: Posted by: b | Nov 20 2004 16:43 utc | 29 I’m not feeling real hopeful — reading the latest Adbusters always seems to send me into a pit of despair, even when they’re trying to be inspiring — as with the current year end issue. Who believes seriously that Kerry would be ‘better’ than Bush? Better the rightwing jackals be left holding the shitbag of Iraq, economy, etc. Posted by: slothrop | Nov 20 2004 20:24 utc | 31 @slothrop — new thread (the Vulture of the Moon has swooped down on my ill-considered trifle and dropped it on the front page). One more thought and then I really must get something done in the real world.
“the better off you are, the worse off you are” — it’s like a long-deferred theory of social justice coming true. finally, the CBA is situated where it should be, with those who receive the benefits also experiencing the costs. but will it teach us anything? if past performance is any indication of future behaviour, then the next move from the industrial pharmacomplex will be to start touting “progress” in the brave new field of engineering mercury-resistant humans, so that for a big fat price you can have a designer baby guaranteed (ho ho) immunity to mercury-poisoned fish. I was cooking a semi-thawed turkey this morning. You know: when its a little thawed but the giblet bag and the neck are crammed into an icy cavity and are still semi-stuck? Finally your pry the semi frozen neck from its icy hole and its so cold it makes you shiver right down to your shoes! I don’t know why but my experience made me think that this was what Condelezza Rice’s honeymoon was like. Posted by: Diogenes | Nov 21 2004 5:16 utc | 34 Oh good heavens — are these guys historically illiterate? or do they think we are? or do they think it’s just hilarious? or…
— I don’t have to google for it. I recognise it. And I’m still embarrassed to be living in this country at this moment. ‘Night all. Iran has six months. Posted by: DM | Nov 21 2004 13:02 utc | 37 Only 18 days after the election abortion rights are cut back: Refusing abortion made easier Posted by: b | Nov 21 2004 14:14 utc | 38 someone sent this to me. Food for thought. This is a passage from E. Nesbit’s book, The Story of the Amulet :
Posted by: dan of steele | Nov 22 2004 13:42 utc | 39 Excellent Dan. Made me laugh. Posted by: rapt | Nov 22 2004 15:29 utc | 40 DeAnander @ 3:06 AM on November 19: that citation (@1:06 AM) was meant as a droll response to slothrop’s two posts immediately preceding. The line comes from Nietzsche’s Thus Spake Zarathustra, and Nietzsche himself cites it as an epigram to the third treatise of his Genealogy of Morality (the one entitled “What are Ascetic Ideals?”}. The line’s pertinence, if any, to slothrop’s posts is its insistence on the role of polemic in the work of philosophy (news, then as now, to some philosophers). Polemic, for Nietzsche, is the highest expression of intellectual health (and his quote assumes that we already know that “sophia” is Greek for “wisdom”)…..Trying to explain a joke is like running a red-light in rush-hour traffic: it’s not funny , it’s wrong, it doesn’t get you anywhere, and it bothers the neighbors. Posted by: alabama | Nov 22 2004 16:06 utc | 41 @Diogenes: Posted by: FlashHarry | Nov 22 2004 16:26 utc | 42 @bama — yes, I recognised the allusion, have read (with some distaste) TSZ. it just reminded me how very much I dislike Nietzsche… brings to mind his crack, you should pardon the expression, about remembering to take one’s whip along when visiting a woman. DeAnander: It’s not that mankind is resilient. Just that maybe some mutants will survive and form a new species, and the current one will simply die off in a gruesome way in the next centuries. Posted by: CluelessJoe | Nov 22 2004 17:26 utc | 44 deananader Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 22 2004 18:49 utc | 46 that would be averroès & that would be at le speakeasy Posted by: remembereringgiap | Nov 22 2004 18:50 utc | 47
Posted by: Fran | Nov 22 2004 20:41 utc | 48 Well, DeAnander, we can always pass over slothrop’s citation of Nietzsche by attending directly to the motto from Aulus Gellius (“The spirits increase, vigor grows through a wound”). Aulus Gellius might be said to “transvalue” the value of mere “war” (and of the warrior) by taking philosophy as the zone of a larger war. Nietzsche, certainly, takes that proposition one step further by casting his own work as a polemical exercise through and through, affirming polemics as the great way to enlarge our spirits precisely when our spirits fail (an interestng idea, in my view)….I suspect, by the way, that Nietzsche’s misogyny is always marked by his quarrel with philosophy; in identifying philosophy as a woman, he at least shows himself a conscientious reader of the classics (Socrates’ Diotima comes to mind, as well as Boethius’ Dame Philosophy). Conflicted, certainly, but conscientious all the same. Posted by: alabama | Nov 22 2004 21:43 utc | 49 STATE DEPARTMENT The State Department is calling on Ukraine to investigate allegations of fraud in its presidential elections — or risk souring relations with the U-S. Posted by: DM | Nov 22 2004 22:25 utc | 50 Boethius? Instead of watching the Simpsons, I could read boethius. Posted by: slothrop | Nov 22 2004 23:10 utc | 51 slothrop: in this regard, Nietzsche is in the enlightening company of Socrates himself – there are some fine quotes one could get from Criton and from the Apologia. Well, same goes with Platon, but he went too close to absolutist ideology for my taste, with his Republic and some other writings. Posted by: Clueless Joe | Nov 22 2004 23:44 utc | 52 Where politics is concerned, slothrop, wasn’t Nietzsche opposed to just about everything? No utopian, he! (but I’ll have to check on this one). Posted by: alabama | Nov 23 2004 0:30 utc | 53 What politics in nietzsche? “stamp becoming with being.” I sort of think his politics would be right-libertarian. I don’t know. Posted by: slothrop | Nov 23 2004 0:37 utc | 54 But, seems to me, there’s no politically normative dimension in FN’s ouevre; nor is there a social theory per se. Posted by: slothrop | Nov 23 2004 0:41 utc | 55 Thank God the US, at Least, Has an Enlightened Electorate Posted by: Aristophanes | Nov 23 2004 3:44 utc | 56 I really shouldn’t be butting in here, because I have not read any of this stuff in over thirty years. Posted by: DM | Nov 23 2004 7:08 utc | 57 oops – that previous link was only to an index – and it has already been changed. Posted by: DM | Nov 24 2004 2:24 utc | 59 Hawks push regime change in N Korea (By Jim Lobe) Posted by: DM | Nov 24 2004 6:50 utc | 60 How does anyone ever know what or who to believe? Must we always believe everything unless it is proven to be false? (define false) Posted by: DM | Nov 24 2004 13:04 utc | 61 O would some power the giftie gie us to see ourselves as others see us Posted by: DM | Nov 25 2004 4:10 utc | 62 |
||