Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 25, 2004
Breaking the Neckline

This is a 20 year chart of the traded US Dollar Index. This index is computed using a trade-weighted geometric average of six foreign currencies against the dollar.

Dollar Chart

 

Many traders in the stock, commodities and currency markets use Technical Analysis (TA). TA suggests that, based on human behaviour like "herding" and basic market dynamics, certain price pattern develop and can be plotted. Such pattern have been observed in many charts and experience allows predicion of future market behavior when distinguished pattern occure.

The blue line of the monthly US Dollar index value forms a smaller scale and a bigger scale head and shoulder pattern. A left shoulder, a head and a right shoulder are visible, as are two necklines. The smaller head and shoulder pattern is marked in green and the larger one marked in red.
The red neckline is incidently also the (so far) all time bottom or support line, of the USD index value.

Technical Analysis suggests that a distinctive break of the neckline of a head and shoulder pattern results in a movement of the same absolut value and direction than the difference between the head of the pattern and the neckline itself.

The top of the HS pattern was at about 122 in early 2001. The green neckline at 94 broke in late 2002. This suggested a fall of (122-94 =) 28 points below the neckline to (94-28 =) 66.
A break of the red neckline suggests a fall of (122-81 =) 41 points below the neckline at 81, leading to a US Dollar Index value of (81-41 =) 40. Today’s international purchase value of a US$ 1.00 would be down to 50 cents. The time horizont for reaching that level may be the same than the time distance between the heads top and the neckline break, in this case 3 to 5 years.

Currently the US Dollar Index is some 82.46. If the current downtrend continues, the neckline will be broken by the middle of next week. A more typical behaviour could be a short few month bump off the neckline followed by a downturn that significantly brakes that line and closes the pattern.

Comments

Chief economist of Morgan Stanley, Stephen Roach, in an OpEd of todays New York Times When Weakness Is a Strength

America’s consumption binge has its mirror image in excess savings elsewhere in the world – especially in Asia and Europe. For now, America draws freely on this reservoir, absorbing about 80 percent of the world’s surplus savings. Just as the United States has moved production and labor offshore in recent years, it is now outsourcing its savings.
This is a dangerous arrangement. The day could come when foreign investors demand better terms for financing America’s spending spree (and savings shortfall). That is the day the dollar will collapse, interest rates will soar and the stock market will plunge. In such a crisis, a United States recession would be a near certainty. And the rest of an America-centric world would be quick to follow.
The only way to avoid this unhappy future is for the world’s major central banks to carefully manage a gradual but significant depreciation of the dollar over the next several years. America, and the world, would gain in several ways.

What’s certain is that a lopsided world needs to be put back into balance. The dollar is the world’s most widely used currency, but its fall affects more than just foreign-exchange rates. A weakening dollar is an encouraging sign that the world’s relative price structure – essentially the value of one economy versus another – is becoming more sensible. If the world can manage the dollar’s decline wisely, there is more reason for hope than despair.

When the Plaza Accord was engineered in 1985 to allow for a controlled Dollar decline, the US agreed to cut its deficits by raising taxes.
So far I see no signal from the Bush administration to cut the deficit and to raise taxes, but only for go deeper into debt. I doubt that an agreement for an orderly decline, as Roach would like to have it, can happen without concessions from the US.

Posted by: b | Nov 26 2004 8:48 utc | 1

The policy responses are clear. The federal government’s irresponsible dependence on international capital flows has helped to bring the U.S. economy closer to the brink of either a financial crisis or a prolonged economic slowdown. To reduce this possibility, federal budget policy needs to be put on a course towards fiscal responsibility.
Link

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Nov 26 2004 9:01 utc | 2

Dollar drops: Good news and bad

Posted by: Sic transit gloria USA | Nov 26 2004 12:16 utc | 3

Fifty percent in 3-5 years! And from a much lower base than when the currecy last plunged in 1985. A question: will all the currencies in that index rise equally, or will there be some variation? If there’s not, it seems to suggest the euro would rise to about $2.67. Now that’s a startling thought.

Posted by: Harrow | Nov 26 2004 18:16 utc | 5

@Harrow
Euro already has taken the major part from 0.80 to 1.33 Dollar per Euro. Japan and China will have to take bigger crunch this leg down. The “best” deal will be in commodity backed countries – Australian, New Zealand, Canada.
And remember charts and TA are not science and anything can happen. But as a majority of traders follow them at least as guidance and as the fundamentals fit, they develop some strong effects on there own.

Posted by: b | Nov 26 2004 18:23 utc | 6

While the collective United States was out today for another consumption binge on Chinese DVD players, the US Dollar Index closed the day and the week at 81.81. This is below it’s 1995 low, i.e. the red neckline. This is not yet decisive. It may recover some if the Japanes and Chinese central banks intervene Monday or something totally unexpected happens, but I doubt that anything will have much effect now.
As gold and currency guru and wingnut Jim Sinclair (reg.req.) says in tonights market wrapup:

I don’t think it matters one hoot if all the firepower of the U.S. government is turned on stopping the dollar’s decline, because in my opinion, a pull-back to the underside of the BEARISH neckline of all time is the best-case scenario for the Humpty Dumpty Dollar. That is the best that can be done, yet it may not even happen.
This is serious. This is the real-time death-rattle of the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency of choice. This is the birth of the Russian ruble, Chinese currency and Islamic dinar as currencies of preference. I still look at the euro as a basket of junk, preferring, as you know, the Swiss and Cando as my currencies of choice. The Swiss, because it is the traditional currency of the old European super-wealthy, and the Cando, because it’s a resource-based nation, even if a few provinces are somewhat strange.

U.S. dollar whipsaws on worries over China
Russians set to ditch dollar reserves for euros
Where is that gold dinar? (On this one – it’s coming, may take a while, but it’s on its way.)
This is a predicted desaster. The folks living on Dollars may not really feel the effects today, but they will through the next few years.
Can you think US$100/barrel oil, 15% inflation per year, that silver necklace that was $150 this year at $450 next Chrismas? Maybe I am a wingnut too predicting this, but so far it was profitable to be one.

Posted by: b | Nov 26 2004 21:24 utc | 7

I’am kind of talking to myself here …
Roach’s crew today on currency movements.

Posted by: b | Nov 26 2004 22:41 utc | 8

thanks for the links, b. I’ve been at work all day.
it was strange to read Roach’s editorial in the NYTimes today and know that more than a year ago I made decisions about my own “position” on the dollar and mentioned it to everyone I thought might care to know back then.
there is no real leadership in America on either side, as far as some sort of fiscal responsibility.
I think that the biggest problem in America is that oil has such a stranglehold on the govt that they are impeding progress via their incestuous love triangle with both parties (and the campaign finances and lobbyists who pimp for oil.)
It’s a farce to say that America has free market capitalism. It’s cronyism all the way. If subsidies were removed for current energy, as has been discussed before, other forms would have a more level playing field.
considering the impact that oil is going to have on the future, it’s also amazing that someone from either party has not undertaken the equivalent of a “interstate” building system, like Eisenhower did, but for alternative energy and to create alternatives to driving between big cities (and like the chunnel, people could take their cars if they have to have them.)
it feels like I’m watching a slo-mo train derailing, and the engineer didn’t care that there were no tracks up ahead.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 26 2004 23:25 utc | 9

…and the Cando, because it’s a resource-based nation, even if a few provinces are somewhat strange.

For your information, Jimmy old boy, we call it the LOONIE. This refers to the bird on the back of the dollar coin, and the fact you used to have to be a bit nuts to use it, when it was not worth much relative to the greenback. And just what do you mean a few provinces are strange?! We are a services-based nation, like all rich countries. Even our exports are mostly manufactured goods. Though not for too much longer, I bet.
The “best” deal will be in commodity backed countries – Australian, New Zealand, Canada.
What the hell? We’ve already appreciated by 35% against the Yanqui peso in the last 2½ years. Now God is going to punish us some more for having so much frigging ore and tar sands?
I am absolutely intrigued by the Islamic gold dinar (and silver dirham) and was pleased to see some pictures of those released by Malaysia recently. But it seems that they are lukewarm at best about their creation, because I don’t see any movement to get rid of the ringgit as a fiat currency. They are talking about removing the dollar peg sometime next summer and starting a managed float, in response to China’s alleged plans.

Posted by: Harrow | Nov 27 2004 5:05 utc | 10

Even the NYT starts to understand Foreign Interest Appears to Flag as Dollar Falls

Recent data from the Treasury Department indicated that foreign governments had sharply slowed their purchases of Treasury securities. The question is whether those purchases will continue to slow or start to increase again as countries try to shore up the American currency to help maintain their own industries’ competitiveness.

“You do not need the central banks to sell Treasuries for the dollar to go down,” Mr. Norfield said. “All they have to do is buy less and the dollar is going to be in trouble.”
The euro hit a new high of $1.3329 on Friday in light trading, before settling back about a half-penny.

But could someone please explain to the paper of the record that Euros are not split into pennys but into cents?

Posted by: b | Nov 27 2004 10:43 utc | 11

b, I want to spend a year or so in Europe starting next June (a break from the rigors of the here and now), and have only dollars to take along for the ride. Should I start buying euros at this point? Or maybe gold? It’s going to be a quiet time in any case–expecially if the euro starts costing $2…..Thoughts as to how best to prepare for this particular exercise in self-restraint would be most welcome.

Posted by: alabama | Nov 27 2004 18:50 utc | 12

@alabama
If you have trustworthy contact in Europe let them set up a bank account in Europe and put your money to work there.
Otherwise:
– go to everbank.com and change your US$ to FDIC insured certificates of deposits (CD) denominated in Euros or Swiss Franks or
– buy into the new Gold exchange traded fund – symbol gld Gold goes up when the US$ goes down.
If you do not do this your US$ will be AT LEAST 10% less in (Euro) value next June than they are now, probably some more less.
Disclaimer: I am no professional financial adviser and what I said above is just my personal best guess based on what I read and learned.

Posted by: b | Nov 27 2004 19:59 utc | 13

From a Letter to the Editor printed in todays Financial Times

From Mr.Martin van Zwanenburg
Sir, Having just returned from a business trip to Vietnam, I am seriously concerned about the future of the US dollar. In Ho Chi Minh City I was greeted by a seven-year-old street urchin seeking his customary dollar. When I presented him with a US dollar bill he declined my offer and specified euros. I fear he may know something Mr.Greenspan has not yet told us.

Posted by: b | Nov 27 2004 20:04 utc | 14

WaPo on Bushs move to “privatize” social security: Borrowing Seen in Social Security Plan

CRAWFORD, Texas (Reuters) – Facing record budget deficits, the Bush administration likely will turn to short-term government borrowing to help finance its plan to add personal retirement accounts to Social Security, officials said on Saturday.

Bush’s advisers believe a short-term increase in borrowing is likely necessary to finance the transition to private accounts.

One analysis this year by the White House Council of Economic Advisers found that tapping the bond markets to pay for private accounts would increase the nation’s debt-to-GDP ratio by 23.6 percentage points by 2036.
Under this scenario, the debt held by the public would increase by as much as $4.7 trillion. But the new government bonds would be repaid 20 years later, eliminating Social Security’s unfunded liability while reducing the tax burden in the long term, advocates said.

Quite a bit of “short-term increase in borrowing”. Who will buy these bonds? Oh sure, they will make the those bonds mandatory part of the “privat” social security accounts and make the worthless later.
Investors beware…

Posted by: b | Nov 28 2004 19:53 utc | 15

b
But could someone please explain to the paper of the record that Euros are not split into pennys but into cents?
I think you are reading it wrong. The price of a Euro is in dollars and a penny is 1/100 of a dollar.
I will be quiet now.

Posted by: dan of steele | Nov 28 2004 20:19 utc | 16

dan – you`r right – dumb me

Posted by: b | Nov 28 2004 20:34 utc | 17

Alabama- I’d suggest you watch the currency rates, which may show some dips (upsides, but briefly, too). If the dollar goes a little higher, buy some euro traveler’s checks at that time. on the other hand, if the dollar seems to be a bottomless pit…you might want to quickly buy some euros and also keep some cash so that you can buy if the dollar goes up…but you have to watch the rates and go with your gut…and, like b, I’m not financial advisor.
then, when you can, you can park the traveler’s checks in a bank in Europe where they can earn some interest.
or you might want to look at putting money into a Canadian bank as the first of a two-part step…I’m just guessing here, but I wonder if the looney will hold its value better than the dollar and stem a loss if you’re looking to open an account in Europe.
what say you Canadians about the looney versus the dollar holding against the Euro?
but at this point, the dollar has already started a decline, it seems to me, that is part of a cycle…we’re already in it..and now the decision is when to exchange to get the most favorable rates.
b and Jerome- here in the U.S., they keep talking about how the drop in the dollar is going to hurt Europe’s economy, that this drop is a payback from Bush because of France and Germany’s refusal to back him in Iraq, and that the growing value of the Euro will force countries in Europe to cut benefits and salaries or interest rates in order to compensate for an inflated Euro value.
Since China seems like one vast under-saturated place for China to be able to sell its own goods (I’m not saying that’s great….just saying that’s where it seems to be going…) their issue seems to be that they’ll need to raise wages for all those people earning nearly nothing to make the cheap goods purchased here…which could also cause inflation, but then, if these wage earners gain some power over the govt, the govt will, to avoid a crisis from their decreasingly valuable dollar holdings.
since China is going after so many commodities, minerals, etc. to fuel their growth, it seems like they’ll have to decide to turn their growth inward and spread the wealth in order to survive an unstable American economy.
is this about right, or totally wrong?

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 29 2004 1:09 utc | 18

FWIW
The only person I have heard of making money on currency speculation was George Soros.
For the rest of us it is a crap shoot.
I live in Italy but I am paid in dollars. For years I used to try to guess whether the dollar would go up or down. I never got it right, even when I did exactly opposite of what I thought I should do. So I don’t even try anymore. I watch with amusement as my co-workers try to get rich quick by buying dollars @ 1.20 to the euro. They bought some more at 1.30. I am hearing that the dollar will probably fall to 1.70 against the euro in the very near future.
We tend to modify our spending a bit when the dollar is weak and splurge some when the dollar is strong. Unless you are making major purchases it really doesn’t matter that much. If you spend 25 percent more on a vacation, how much is that really? 200 dollars? maybe a 1000 if you are going first class?
I see that with the price of gasoline in the states as well. If you can afford a $50,000 SUV you can probably afford to spend an extra 100 dollars for fuel each month.
So after all this rambling I want to say, don’t sweat it. There are ways to save money in Europe and that might be a better avenue rather than speculating on exchange rates. Furthermore, interest rates are not very good in the banks (in Italy at least) and with all of their damn fees and service charges you end up losing money if you put it in savings.

Posted by: dan of steele | Nov 29 2004 9:13 utc | 19

fauxreal
The prevailing CW is that European economies are fucked up. When the dollar was strong, it was because European economies were fucked up and that strength reflected the US economy’s strength… Now that the dollar is weak, it is still apparently a reflection of Europe’s economic weakness…
I think we should realise that the European economies are not as sensitive to currency movements as they used to be (now that most of our trade partners are using the same currency as we are), and that we should stop worrying about exchange rates as we used to when it was indeed vital. If you start considering French-German (and all the other pairings) trade as intra-zone trade and not as foreign trade, we suddenly appear as a pretty self-sufficient and self contained zone.
A lot of our dollar trade is imports of commodities, starting with oil, and the dollar’s fall is not going to hurt us much there… A lot of our exports in dollars are high-end goods with pretty price-unlelastic demand (meaning that people will not stop buying Vuitton or BMWs or medical scanners because they are a little bit more expensive).
So we shoulf simply start worrying less about the dollar. And, if we are so worried, maybe start thinking in more concrete terms about joint Euro-zone economic policies instead of reverting to economic nationalism at every occasion.
Again, most of the economy and financial commentators are in London or the USA and they are infused with values and ideology which are not all shared by “Old” Europeans and they also have a personal incentive to show that “their” system works better than that of the nasty [insert expletive] on the other side of the sea. The Economist clings to numbers which are 3 years out of date to keep on showing the British population and GDP are larger than the French and the Italian (and I know that the French do the same, but that’s the point – I have both sides of the story, not just the Anglo one)
Europe’s economy is not in such a bad shape. The US economy has been boosted by its housing bubble and when it comes crashing down it will be nasty, but the effects on Europe will be muted, because there are fewer weaknesses – no real unbalances to redress, stable (if not buoyant) domestic demand), and it is simply big enough to stand on its own feet, even if people do not believe it yet.

Posted by: Jérôme | Nov 29 2004 10:29 utc | 20

Jerome- thanks. that’s what I’d heard from the “old Europe” side, and then when I read what the “experts” wrote in the NYTimes biz sections, or the WSJ, or even The FT, I wondered how much is reality and how much is the desire to make Europe look bad because it seems to be able to afford human rights (health care, more leisure time for workers w/o the fear of economic ruin).
The knee-jerk response that I hear in the U.S., whenever I mention issues like universal health care, is how bad it is…with “socialist” Europe as the example…and this is from people who are not rich. It’s amazing how the views of the rich have permeated all levels of American society. They generally have no real experience with the European system, too.
America has a very, very, very effective propaganda machine in place.
I do like the historical view…yes, it’s absolutely true that here you always get the “blame Europe first” view about economics in the biz news in America. I know this from my own reading over time. Thanks for reminding me, to help to create a little perspective.
I also agree with you that the luxury market is the European market in America and it will not suffer since the luxury class is gaining with the current policies. Apparently, for the second year in a row, middle class and lower class oriented retailers in the U.S. are the ones feeling the pressure of the current policies, while the high end, like Tiffany’s, is doing just fine.
dan of steele- warren buffet also took a bearish position on the dollar long ago.
I agree that it’s probably useless to fret over every little change in the currency rate, but I always feel better when I beat the rates a little bit. Not talking about making big money, just making your own money go a little farther.
big moves are better than lots of small ones, true, with the fees on wires or conversions for each transaction. although some places charge a percentage of the amount, too.

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 29 2004 15:31 utc | 21

Everyone talks about the coming real estate crash, but why would housing prices have to crash if the US dollar devalued? At least in the citries, wouldn’t foreign buyers replace the domestic ones going bankrupt? Somehow it seems likely to me that we would have a housing crisis, but the crisis would mostly be that Americans would stop owning their own homes, and would increasingly rent from either wealthy Americans or wealthy foreigners.
My suspicion is that real estate on fixed rates is still a good investment so long as one is sure that one can keep earning money. Even if real estate drops a bit, wouldn’t foreign buyers keep the real estate market a better investment than almost any other dollar investment?

Posted by: Citizen | Nov 29 2004 17:22 utc | 22

@Citizen
Why would foreign buyers buy US private houses? The prices are high, the Dollar has some more to drop and only when both movements would be finished AND the renting market would allow for some decent returns it could be seen as a good business.
Nominal house prices could stay at the current level if inflation picks up. Real value of houses, i.e. after inflation, will drop in my view. But if you have a fixed mortgage for some 6% and some income it will not hurt much.
But the crowd that bought during the last year at overvalued prices and on adjustable rate mortgages will get hurt and that will bring some additional “empty” houses to the market.
It´s difficult to tell which variable will chase the other one here. Both, a drop and stagnation are possible. A further significant price increase can only happen accompanied with severe inflation.

Posted by: b | Nov 29 2004 17:54 utc | 23

Citizen- the issue is people who have ARMs, not fixed rate mortgages, and is related to national debt and the people who finance it. Interest rates have already gone up a little bit, and are expected to rise some more. so the people who bet on rates staying low will end up paying more if they don’t refinance for a fixed rate.
people who bought a house to live in at a fixed rate who have a stable job do not have a problem, though in some parts of the country the cost of housing is pretty high for what you get.
some bears worry that too many people are overly indebted, both via ARM mortgages and credit card debt, and they will not be able to afford their bills with the increase in interest rates.
and some people think that the overvaluation of some real estate markets means they are due for a correction. this isn’t everywhere in the country. I think I read about the Las Vegas area having problems selling the houses they’ve built at the price they expect, for instance, recently. And people who expected they had accrued a certain amount of equity in their existing homes found that, because of so much new construction, their older home wasn’t as valuable as they’d expected it to be.
if a lot of people are overextended on debt and can’t afford to make their housing payments, they may decide to sell their houses. So then you’d have a situation where it is a “buyers” market, with lots of properties competing for the same buyer’s dollar. if sellers compete by lowering prices to quickly sell…

Posted by: fauxreal | Nov 29 2004 22:31 utc | 24