Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
October 28, 2004
Rule and Appeal

SEATTLE – The Bush administration has proposed giving dam owners the exclusive right to appeal Interior Department rulings about how dams should be licensed and operated on American rivers

The proposal would prevent states, Indian tribes and environmental groups from making their own appeals, while granting dam owners the opportunity to take their complaints — and suggested solutions — directly to senior political appointees in the Interior Department.

Dam owners “would be facing an extremely high cost and very uncertain benefits,” said Lynn Scarlett, the assistant secretary at Interior for policy, management and budget who approved the proposed rule. “Giving them some ability to voice their concern and present alternatives seemed appropriate.”

[The proposal] will be open to public comment until Nov. 8. The department can then, with the approval of the Office of Management and Budget, issue a final rule that has the power of law.

Further proposals, pairing future government rulings and the exclusive rights to appeal them, are to be published in next months Federal Register. Some possible pairings mentioned in the press conference were:

Ruling on / Exclusive Right to Appeal
– abortions / priests
– car driving / car owners,
– torturing / torturers,
– air quality / polluters,
dams / dam owners,
– marriage / married couples,
– milk quality / diary farmers.

Comments

“Indian leaders said the proposal would betray the federal government’s legal responsibility to tribes.”
Hmmm, they can’t really be surprised that the US government doesn’t respect the treaties it had with them, could they? Or did they forget the last 229 years?

Posted by: Clueless Joe | Oct 28 2004 17:09 utc | 1

“Tribal sovereignty means that. It’s sovereign. You’re a … you’re a … you’ve been given sovereignty and you’re viewed as a sovereign entity.”

Posted by: MarcinGomulka | Oct 28 2004 20:50 utc | 2

Download the entire Fahrenheit 911 movie here – free

Posted by: Anonymous | Oct 28 2004 22:49 utc | 3

Torture and torturers?
Dear holy god, Bernhard, is that for real?

Posted by: Leslie in CA | Oct 29 2004 4:58 utc | 4

Bernhard are you yanking our collective chain again? Before I get a 2nd degree burn from the steam coming out my ears I would like to know if this is another of your wicked April Fools jests…

Posted by: DeAnander | Oct 29 2004 5:08 utc | 5

as a straving student, anybody wanna buy me front row tickets to THIS ! if only… ;-(
also for your howl-0-wennie delight:
welcome to PNAC world baby! Too bad this is real.
Scientists warn of ‘ethnic weapons’
“In theory, experts could engineer organisms to attack genetic variations commonly found in, say, Chinese or German populations.” Or imagine a Muslim extremist concocting a virus that mostly kills people of Jewish ancestry. Or an Arab-killing virus “accidentally” set loose in the Mid-East and subsequently chalked up to a natural mutation. A genetic “heat-seeker” virus needn’t be a weapon of mass destruction; if its designers are savvy enough, it could be incredibly selective, operating with the precision of an assassin.
“advanced forms of biological warfare that can ‘target’ specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.” PNAC

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Oct 29 2004 5:22 utc | 6