|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
October 9, 2004
Off Topics Here Please
Comments
Seymor Hersh talk:
I don´t agree on that “violent block” Posted by: b | Oct 9 2004 11:15 utc | 1 i’m currently enjoying an mp3 audio file in which gw bush does the vocals to a version of the u2 song “sunday, bloody sunday” – Posted by: mistah charley | Oct 9 2004 11:21 utc | 2 the australian people under their reichsfûhrer howard have shown the world yet again that australia is the true heir to apartheid south africa Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 9 2004 12:00 utc | 3 Hack says the draft is inevitable.
Posted by: koreyel | Oct 9 2004 12:09 utc | 4 mistah charley, Posted by: MarcinGomulka | Oct 9 2004 14:11 utc | 5 i am not very good at maths Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 9 2004 15:16 utc | 6 @rgiap The US has interfered in Australian political affairs before. It’s possible the Ozzies were collectively stupid enough to vote for Howard (after all, he’s presided over a real estate bubble that has everyone slavering with greed). Or maybe the results were stir-fried somehow (though w/o e-voting machines it is harder to falsify an election). thank you deanander for the material Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 9 2004 17:57 utc | 9 Wow, such a shock, the new margins! 😉 Posted by: Kate_Storm | Oct 9 2004 18:03 utc | 10 There is a thing about these huge, lush, open, easily conquered territories – US, Australia – Posted by: Blackie | Oct 9 2004 18:53 utc | 11 At 01:40 PM, DeAnander spells out a fundamental (and rather new) truth about political power: our culture, as Nietzsche sought to remind us, initially evaluated things in terms of “good” and “bad” (“fortunate” or “unfortunate”); and then, thereafter, in terms of “good” and “evil” (of “right” and “wrong”); and then, yet again (as nowadays), in terms of “strength” and “weakness” (of “health” and “unhealth”)….. Strength, in these Nietzschean terms, is not a measure of physical force (muscle power or economic power); it’s a willed commitment (resolute and composed) to the proposition that we can (and should) seek strength in relationship to the corruption surrounding us. “Boycotting” corruption, as DeAnander puts it, is a step towards gaining that strength; and while each of us has a unique way of practicing boycotts, we share the common starting-point of learning to think in these terms (which it isn’t easy to do: I find that it takes time). Posted by: alabama | Oct 9 2004 19:21 utc | 12 I agree with the post quoting Hersh above. Lone ranger Bushie is very dangerous for the world. Posted by: jdp | Oct 9 2004 20:34 utc | 13 Dumb question, but it’s on my mind. Are people who vote for Bush every bit as bad as Bush himself? Posted by: alabama | Oct 9 2004 20:39 utc | 14 Well, my post debate, ontological hair of the dog morning tonic comes in the form of Sartres “bad faith”.In some sense “boycotting corruption” can (in Sartres view) be seen as an antithesis of bad faith — an acceptance of ones own freedom, and the recognition that we are solely responsible for our own acts. The fact that (as you point out) it is is not easy to do, is our recommended dose of “anguish”. Posted by: anna missed | Oct 9 2004 20:45 utc | 15 THIS IS DEFINITELY NOT OFF-TOPIC ! Posted by: name | Oct 9 2004 21:06 utc | 16 a sad day Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 9 2004 22:11 utc | 17 alabama: Dumb question, but it’s on my mind. Are people who vote for Bush every bit as bad as Bush himself? Posted by: Kate_Storm | Oct 9 2004 22:41 utc | 18 a country like australia is steeped in its racist genocidal history – & it has stayed true to that heritage Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 9 2004 23:11 utc | 19 a country like australia is steeped in its racist genocidal history – & it has stayed true to that heritage Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 9 2004 23:12 utc | 20 This needs to be considered: (and kept in mind) Posted by: Uncle $cam | Oct 9 2004 23:14 utc | 22 Derrida is dead? Posted by: slothrop | Oct 10 2004 0:03 utc | 23 Derrida continues to be as he’s always already been: spectral. Posted by: alabama | Oct 10 2004 0:13 utc | 24 How weird that Howard campaign signs read “A Stronger Australia” and Kerry’s read “A Stronger America” Posted by: b real | Oct 10 2004 0:25 utc | 25 Yes, I also saw that Derrida died. What an amazing mind. Posted by: fauxreal | Oct 10 2004 1:37 utc | 26 Old story, but funny choice of words: Posted by: MarcinGomulka | Oct 10 2004 2:04 utc | 27 Which brings up the question why the separate government would by run by a guy, whom Gen. Tommy Franks called, quote: Posted by: MarcinGomulka | Oct 10 2004 2:06 utc | 28 sorry, Franks talked about Feith, and Colin meant Cheney is the ruler. That would make Feith … whom? The clown? Posted by: MarcinGomulka | Oct 10 2004 2:10 utc | 29 @ alabama & Kate Posted by: Juannie | Oct 10 2004 3:49 utc | 30 Hey, about the Bush Bulge — ya know, the thing on the back that might be wired… another technology that looks rather like this is an electronically controlled dosage drip, you know, the metered drug drip devices used (mostly) by people with really serious chronic pain. The back would be an odd place to wear it — why not around the waist? actually same is true of a RF audio rig — why wouldn’t he have worn it around his waist on a belt of some kind instead of digging into his back like that? If the firefighters are voting for John Kerry and the Democrats. That’s good enough for me. Posted by: Anonymous | Oct 10 2004 4:54 utc | 32 The American public schools start the processing early. The training for “factory” has to circumvent the child’s innate curiosity and desire to comprehend and construct his own foundation of knowledge, so that is the first skill to be destroyed. Soon the fledglings are only reservoirs, gaping mouths open to receive the meager nourishment their rich and vibrant minds desire. As their minds are starved and their capacity to think for themselves is crippled, the socialization and programming begins. Chldren are not allowed to express opinions or debate. They are not even allowed to talk amongst themselves, interpersonal reinforcement is verboten, someone may actually gives these children ideas or heaven forbid they might learn to think for themselves. Their emaciated psyches dart here and there, looking for any morsel of information and there is the state, the savior in the guise of teacher, filling the barren brain with platitudes and nationalistic jingo. That filling, that sensory pleasure of finally being fed is what drives American voters who are manipulated by the catch phrses and signal words that illicit those programmed responses. It takes an enormous amount of metacognition and self realization to see the effects of so many years of programmed responses being spoon fed to the populace. Unfortunately, many never have the energy or desire to feed themselves. Hence, the Bush voter has been poured and molded. Identical products churned out by the factory schools. Posted by: SME in Seattle | Oct 10 2004 5:19 utc | 33 A small sign of hope – both candidates in the debate mentioned in turn the need for the USA to “reduce its energy dependency on the ME”. Now that’s a lot of hot air as we know, especially on the Bush – let’s drill Alaska or subsdise my Big-energy friends in some new way- side, but I find it interesting that it is entering the general discourse nevertheless. Posted by: Jérôme | Oct 10 2004 11:36 utc | 34 R’Giap Posted by: DM | Oct 10 2004 11:53 utc | 35 And while I’m at it, I’ll take this opportunity of this OT thread to give you some personal news: my son’s tumor is borderline between being benign and malign, but the doctors have decided for the time being to treat it (i.e. what’s left after surgery) as benign, with only chimio but no radiotherapy (he also has to do physical reeducation to get back the motricity lost in surgery – his right side is partly paralysed). So we’re off for a year and a half of treatment, which at least means some predictability and stability for us, if a different kind than before. My wife has pretty much given up on her job, but we stick together with the other two kids, our families and friends around us in a really strong way. So my message is: don’t despair, be optimistic, look around you and remember what (and who) is important to you, and act on it! Posted by: Jérôme | Oct 10 2004 12:00 utc | 36 dm Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 13:13 utc | 37 jérôme Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 13:14 utc | 38 dm Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 13:39 utc | 39 alabama: Dumb question, but it’s on my mind. Are people who vote for Bush every bit as bad as Bush himself? Posted by: SusanG | Oct 10 2004 14:20 utc | 40 Australian Greens leader Bob Brown said Australia would be a nastier country with the government in control of the Senate. Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 14:54 utc | 41 You can repeat it until the cows come home, but it still doesn’t make you right. Australia does not have a deeply racist foreign policy. Show me the policy paper, facts, immigration statistical breakdown, public or private sector discrimination. Posted by: DM | Oct 10 2004 15:18 utc | 42 dm Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 16:24 utc | 43 Adorno:
Kery: “I support[ed] the Patriot Act. Posted by: slothrop | Oct 10 2004 17:14 utc | 44 …That is to say, by voting for Kerry, do I merely serve the “perpetuation of existing society” (militarism, golbal economic elitism, etc.) and that a Kerry vote is thus “incompatible with consciousness of [society] itself”? Posted by: slothrop | Oct 10 2004 17:22 utc | 45 R’Giap Posted by: DM | Oct 10 2004 17:30 utc | 46 Good reading – Interview with John Kenneth Galbraith. Here his final comment: Posted by: Fran | Oct 10 2004 18:06 utc | 47 dm Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 18:37 utc | 48 thank you fran Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 18:43 utc | 50 DM, RGiap, I think you talk at cross purposes. One question is an absolute level of racism, the other is a relative one, right? Posted by: Jérôme | Oct 10 2004 19:00 utc | 51 jérôme Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 19:23 utc | 52 Australian Social Trends 2002 Posted by: Blackie | Oct 10 2004 19:26 utc | 53 thank you blackie – there is a great deal more on infant mortality, on blindness etc but i’m not so skilled with intenet to find & use links Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 19:32 utc | 54 remembereringgiap Posted by: dan of steele | Oct 10 2004 19:37 utc | 55 Jerome, glad to hear that news about you son is not negative and that you are all bearing up. Posted by: Blackie | Oct 10 2004 19:41 utc | 56 @rgiap desolated to hear of your fragile health. one rather dark consolation is that the end state of diabetes is merciful compared to many other exits; I have lost one friend by that route and her passing was peaceful and dignified, in her own home, a long sleep without any precipice or panic. there’s an old, hokey faux-country pop song popular in my younger years, and one verse of it has stuck with me ever since, banal as it may be, because of the real kick of truth in its tail:
@jerome, all fingers crossed for your son’s recovery and no recurrence. RGiap Posted by: Jérôme | Oct 10 2004 20:22 utc | 58 [damn, what happened there? my post got truncated. Comrade Slothrop, is this a hint? may I expect another visit from the unmarked sedan with the strangely bulky occupants?] New Swift Boat Vets ad on the way. Starring Bud May. Posted by: Pat | Oct 10 2004 20:26 utc | 60 That was weird. I suspect a s’ware problem with MT (I assume this is an MT forum). I posted, scrolled down to my new post and found it truncated at “to remember the atrocities”… went back to recover the missing text, posted it, and Presto, when viewing the forum anew, the original post was no longer truncated! I wonder if this was a race condition between me and Jerome at exactly 4:22 and some number of seconds. dan & blackie Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 20:34 utc | 62 jérôme Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 20:45 utc | 63 RGiap – d’accord et bonsoir. Posted by: Jérôme | Oct 10 2004 21:21 utc | 64 bonsoir jérôme Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 10 2004 21:57 utc | 65 @Jerome Posted by: Pat | Oct 10 2004 22:34 utc | 66 We will never forget them Posted by: War on terror | Oct 11 2004 0:02 utc | 68 So, if the Army Times report is anything to go by, soldiers support Bush in greater numbers now than they did in 1999. Posted by: Pat | Oct 11 2004 3:14 utc | 69 Rgiap agrees that the first thing one ought to do upon entering a rich man’s house is to spit upon the floor. Posted by: Pat | Oct 11 2004 4:53 utc | 70 Superman dies Posted by: dan of steele | Oct 11 2004 5:42 utc | 71 Pat, Posted by: Citizen | Oct 11 2004 15:17 utc | 72 re Army Times survey Posted by: b real | Oct 11 2004 16:01 utc | 73 Comrade Slothrop… Posted by: slothrop | Oct 11 2004 16:59 utc | 74 The world is starting to wonder what Bush is wearing beneath its jacket during the debates – here from “Der Spiegel”. Posted by: Fran | Oct 11 2004 18:08 utc | 75 @Slothrop — was that my post you were quoting? I think you must have misinterpreted, if so — the reference to you was merely a continuation of the running joke from previous threads, not to be taken seriously: no deep meaning should be read into it. I enjoy your posts and would be disappointed if you disappeared, with or without the assistance of unmarked sedans. You’d be missed. @War on terror, I saw that news item (9/11 victims, rubbish dump) and thought it was so completely, shockingly apt. The victims have been treated with treacly sentimentality and cold cash coercion. The families have been bought off, silenced, their pain used to galvanise others. They are second degree victims who will not find closure – expendable, good for a few covers of Time, not more. Posted by: Blackie | Oct 11 2004 18:57 utc | 78 slothrop Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 11 2004 21:13 utc | 81 another missive pour slothrop Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 11 2004 22:40 utc | 82 “And what of the Americans themselves? I’ve been re-reading Seymour Hersh’s stunning 1970 account of the My Lai massacre in Vietnam. And there’s something about the casual attitude to death and cruelty in the way that Medina and Calley did their killings there that I find chillingly familiar. Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 11 2004 22:59 utc | 83 Giap Posted by: Cloned Poster | Oct 11 2004 23:10 utc | 84 Interesting article in WaPo about attititudes amongst Marines in Iraq:
for the complete article: Marines in Iraq Posted by: Siun | Oct 12 2004 2:01 utc | 85 Jerome I am happy that there is a hope for good outcome for your son. I’ll keep praying for all of you. Posted by: vbo | Oct 12 2004 7:11 utc | 86 vbo Posted by: DM | Oct 12 2004 9:10 utc | 87 dm Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 12 2004 10:09 utc | 88 R’giap is too far gone in his navel gazing. He is eating himself up with hate, angst, and puerile fantasies of dialectic materialism. His lack of nuance reminds me of Bush. dm Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 12 2004 10:12 utc | 89 @r`giap Posted by: b | Oct 12 2004 10:23 utc | 90 DM have you ever been an immigrant? And I don’t think doing business in some foreign country for any length of time.. Posted by: vbo | Oct 12 2004 10:26 utc | 91 DM Posted by: Jérôme | Oct 12 2004 10:29 utc | 92 & let me absolutely clear Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 12 2004 10:29 utc | 93 Quote: Posted by: vbo | Oct 12 2004 10:34 utc | 94 jérôme Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 12 2004 10:35 utc | 95 R’Giap re your health problems. Do not despair! All tho I do not know your exact situation with diabetes I can tell you about my experiences. First of all my grandfather and my father both were diabetics. My grandfather was very disciplined and he managed to live without insulin for 20 years or so. He was on a diet practically all the time (except celebrations like birthdays, weddings, Christmas etc) and he used to walk extensively…every fucking day. He died at the age of 70 …which is not much but still… Posted by: vbo | Oct 12 2004 13:07 utc | 96 vbo Posted by: remembereringgiap | Oct 12 2004 17:05 utc | 98 Sorry. Sometimes I’m an impulsive sentimental liberal sissy. Especially after too much gin. Posted by: slothrop | Oct 12 2004 17:08 utc | 99 All hail, DM. The alligators of the work-place are swimming all around–above, below, behind and before. I’ll get back on track as soon as they clear out…… Posted by: alabama | Oct 12 2004 17:12 utc | 100 |
||