Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 11, 2004
Thread Open

news and opinions…

Comments

Rumsfeld at the National Press Club:

But if you think about it, that’s not the way the world really was before September 11th. Consider the world of September 10th and before. Two Americans and six others stood on trial by the Taliban in Afghanistan for the crime of preaching their religion. The leader of the opposition Northern Alliance, Massoud, lay dead, his murder ordered by Saddam Hussein — by Osama bin Laden, Taliban’s co- conspirator.

Saddam Hussein (sic), if he’s alive, is spending a whale of a lot of time trying to not get caught. And we’ve not seen him on a video since 2001. Now he’s got to be busy. Why is he busy? It’s because of the pressure that’s being put on him.

Transcript
and Cheney on a campaign event

Cheney added that Hussein had “provided safe harbor and sanctuary to terrorists for years … and had provided safe harbor and sanctuary as well for Al Qaeda.”

LA Times article (stupidly written)
These remarks are of course concertated by Rove. Why dosn´t Kerry beat on Cheney for lying this openly?

Posted by: b | Sep 11 2004 17:23 utc | 1

When Medicine Turns Evil: “No association or guild was more complicit in the rise of Nazism and the desecrations committed by its leaders and followers than the profession of medicine.” — Sherwin Nuland

Posted by: Anonymous | Sep 11 2004 18:02 utc | 2

Oh and for those whom don’t know or missed it: Bush wants to be your shrink “This month”, President Bush plans to unveil a broad new mental health plan called the ‘New Freedom Initiative.’ Never mind that it couldn’t have less to do with freedom; if you’re a thinking American, this initiative should scare the hell out of you.”
Oh, and
the APA is proud you don’t Know :
The American Psychiatric Association is bragging in its own membership newsletter that they pleased the Bush Administration by successfully discouraging the mainstream media from looking into the corruption exposed by the British Medical Journal in a recent series of articles.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 11 2004 18:10 utc | 3

Sorry to be spaming but the above post ‘when medicine turns evil’ was me Uncle $cam. I just figured out when you preview a post you have to reenter your handle ;-(

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 11 2004 18:14 utc | 4

Soma, anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous | Sep 11 2004 20:38 utc | 5

links from Uncle $cam’s post of 2:10 PM.
When Medicine Turns Evil:
Bush wants to be your shrink

Was Orwell recognized for his genius and insight during his day or only posthumously? I pray he has reincarnated and is developing this centuries version of 2014. Ten years is eerily within the grasp of the dominators’ agenda.
We desperately need a voice that will be heard even among the couch potatoes. In the 1700’s it was Tom Paine who got the word out. Is the internet fulfilling this neurological extension today? Again, I pray it is.
In a recent thread, the question of the influence of TV was eluded to. In the 1940’s & 50’s, TV was recognized by the
MK Ultra
program of the US intelligence research communities to be the mind control drug of choice. Just get a TV into most homes and control the programming. It happened of course and today we are witnessing the macabre results in the Bush Kerry polls.
So now the Bushies want to take it one step further. Too many of us don’t watch any or enough TV so they will legislate a mandatory mental health care program and the Pharm’s will not only make a killing profit but will finally put we plebeians in our place.
It gets harder and harder day by day to continue thinking that I/we can really make a difference but what other choice do we have? I wonder if they will search the wilds of the Canadian woods to find the escaped deviates.

Posted by: Juannie | Sep 11 2004 21:14 utc | 6

Soma do, and Soma don’t. 😉

Posted by: Kate_Storm | Sep 12 2004 2:06 utc | 8

Checking all Americans for mental health? Well, wasn’t it the old Stalinists that used to lock people in the asylum when they spoke too loud against the regime?
Anyone wants to take bet as to when Bush will openly round up political opponents and ship them to concentration camps?

Posted by: Clueless Joe | Sep 12 2004 2:56 utc | 9

I think it eventually was called “the chemical gulag”.

Posted by: Kate_Storm | Sep 12 2004 3:12 utc | 10

You will want to hear this: (mp3)
Breaking news from Mike Ruppert on 9/11 Ruppert was in town to talk to the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco on Aug. 31. While in the Bay Area he did an interview for Steppin’ Out of Babylon and KPFA Radio.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 12 2004 4:12 utc | 11

This is what madness looks like:
Hey! How about this idea to make America safer? Let’s open a whole bunch of new flight schools and invite hundreds of people to take lessons in advanced hijacking. What’s that? Sounds like a bad idea? One that would actually make us less safe? OK then, tell me this: Why are we planning to open a whole bunch of new bioterrorism labs and invite hundreds of people to get their hands on the deadliest pathogens known to man?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Sep 12 2004 7:38 utc | 12

After listening to Uncle $cam’s Link from his September 12, 2004 12:12 AM post, I followed the trail to the transcript of Mike Ruppert’s talk to the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco on August, 31, 2004 which can be found at:
Link
Mike Rupert (http//www.FromTheWilderness.com} has documented and is presently publishing, not just smoking guns but verifiable facts implicating a number of top level Bush Administration officials, starting with “Mr. Big” himself, Dick Cheney, in direct complicity in the 9-11 attacks.
His book, “Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil” is due for publication in October.
The following are excerpts from his Commonwealth Club’s talk. My Bold highlights.
“The 9/11 attacks were the result of deliberate planning and orchestrated efforts by identifiable leaders within the U.S. Government, and the energy and financial sectors, to see a Pearl harbor-like attack which would provide the American Empire with a pretext for war, invasion and the sequential confiscation of oil and natural gas reserves, or the key transportation routes through which they pass. 9-11 was a premeditated murder and in my book, and here tonight, I will name some of the suspects who committed the crime. In my book I will show you overwhelming evidence of their guilt which I would be proud and confident to place either before a district attorney or a jury.”
“History today provides us with abundant documentation of us government complicity in varying degrees in similar attacks. Crossing the rubicon is a detective story that gets to the Innermost core of the 9/11 attacks. It places 9/11 at the Center of a desperate new America, created by specific, named individuals in preparation for peak oil: an economic crisis like nothing the world has ever seen.”
“It is my belief, as I speak to you tonight that planet earth is – plus or minus one year – at the all time peak of hydrocarbon energy production. Simply put, we have used half of all the
oil god placed on this planet, and every drop, every barrel extracted from the ground from now on will become progressively more expensive, of lesser quality, and much harder to obtain. We have picked the low hanging fruit.”
“The attacks of September 11th, 2001 were the pretext for the American, and to a lesser extent, the British and Israeli Empires to begin seizing, by force, those energy supplies needed to sustain their power, hegemony (whether regional or global) and their teetering economies.”
“I name some of the us government officials who perpetrated those attacks, I can also identify the prime suspect – or Mr. Big – who played the command role in executing them.”
“Every commission member has deep conflicts of interest with Respect to 9/11 and its investigation of the government Agencies charged with protecting the American people that day. To the 9/11 research Community, the mysterious and inexplicable failure of the nation’s air defenses that day remains the most glaring and gaping hole in the Kean commission’s account and in the Government’s version of events. Scrambling fighter aircraft was a routine occurrence for years before 9/11.”
“For me, the pivotal evidence absolutely demonstrating direct government complicity in, and management of, the attacks was found in a number of undisputed, yet virtually unaddressed war games that I will show were being conducted, coordinated and/or controlled by vice president Dick Cheney or his immediate staff on the morning of September 11th.”
“Blips were deliberately inserted onto FAA and military radar….
This effectively paralyzed fighter response because, with only eight fighters available in the region, There were as many as 22 possible highjackings taking place. Other exercises, specifically Northern Vigilance had pulled significant fighter resources away from the northeast U.S. – just before 9/11 – into northern Canada and Alaska.”
“I will name Richard Cheney as the prime suspect in the mass murders of 9/11 and will establish that, not only was he a planner in the attacks, but also that on the day of the attacks he was running a completely separate command, control and communications system which was superceding any orders being issued by the NMCC, or the white house Situation Room.
Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, were aware that flight 175 was en route to lower manhattan for 20 minutes and did nothing – absolutely nothing – to order the evacuation of or warn the occupants of the world trade center. One military officer was forced to leave his post in the middle of the attacks and place a private call to his brother – who worked at the WTC –
warning him to get out.”

“I will also show that the Israeli and British governments acted as partners with the highest levels of the American government to help in the preparation and, very possibly, the actual execution of the attacks.
Only three countries, the U,S., Britain and Israel that have never wavered in their support of everything that has happened since 9/11.”
Ruppert then connects the dots to bring to focus the connection of Peak Oil and the American Epmire’s critical need to gain and maintain control of the worlds major oil resources. Read his Commenwealth Club talk to get filled in.
I think the tinfoil hats can now be removed.

Posted by: Juannie | Sep 12 2004 16:04 utc | 13

Interessting portrait by the SundayHerald, though not really anything new, but very comprehensiv.
Unmasked: The George W Bush the President Doesn’t Want the World To See

Posted by: Fran | Sep 12 2004 16:34 utc | 14

We have been waiting for this for some time, now it appears that the prop-agenda is starting. Even though the shrub is in the lead now the Rovians will not leave anything to chance. This certainly looks like a run up to the October surprise

Posted by: Dan of Steele | Sep 12 2004 17:08 utc | 15

TomDispatch has two good articles, however I do not know how to link to them separately.
September 33rd
and
Nothing New in the World

Then there is ‘gossip’ (don’t know if this is the correct word) from Bush’s former Professor.
W for war but eager
to avoid it, prof recalls

That’s it, good night.

Posted by: Fran | Sep 12 2004 18:40 utc | 16

Do We Have to ‘Liberate’ Iraqi Towns Again and Again? by Robert Fisk – The Independent, Arab News

Three-years ago, it was all about Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda; then, at about the time of the Enron scandal — and I have a New York professor to thank for spotting the switching point — it was Saddam and weapons of mass destruction and 45 minutes and human rights abuses in Iraq and well, the rest is history.

More on Iraq and 9/11 in there, but the Enron point is crucial.

Posted by: b | Sep 12 2004 20:02 utc | 17

The war on terrorism finally making progress! (sarcasm intended)
Amid Cheers, Terrorists Have Landed in the U.S.

Posted by: Fran | Sep 13 2004 5:24 utc | 18

Are the dominos finally going to fall???
Bush team ‘knew of abuse’ at Guantánamo

Posted by: Fran | Sep 13 2004 5:47 utc | 19

From Defense and the National Interest (d-n-i.net):
Is the Atlantic Alliance Doomed?????
September 12, 2004
Comment #525
Attached References:
[Ref.1] Media Release, “Poll of 35 Countries Finds 30 Prefer Kerry, 3 Bush: Traditional US Allies Strongly Favor Kerry; Bush Preferred in Philippines, Poland and Nigeria; Most Say Bush Foreign Policy Has Made Them Feel Worse Toward US,” For release: September 8, 2004 12:30 pm
——————————————————————————–
Professor Gabriel Kolko, an occasional contributor to the blaster, has kindly granted his permission to distribute and post his his most recent analysis on U.S. grand strategy … or lack thereof. It appeared in the current issue of the French journal Le Monde Diplomatique. Kolko makes a very interesting grand-strategic argument: namely, it is a good thing that the aggressive foreign policy of the United States is destroying the post World War II alliance structure. The alliance structure is outdated now that there is no Soviet Union. Besides, history suggests that formal alliances encourage aggressive behavior by individual countries who depend on the support of their allies. If Germany had no alliance structure (and there was no countervailiang alliance structure opposing Germany), for example, the behavior of the Great Powers might have been less belligerent in the period leading up to World War I. Of course, re-writing history is speculation, but a future world without alliances, Kolko argues, will be a more peaceful world because it will moderate the behaviour of great powers. In this context of formal alliance structures, he decries the aggressive foreign policy of the United States, and he notes that what little difference exists between democrats and republicans is one of style, not substance. But whoever wins the presidential election, he believes the policies of the United States will eventually destroy the Atlantic Alliance, although he thinks it will take longer under the Democrats. And that will a good thing, even if the pathway to that end is not so good.[…]

Posted by: Pat | Sep 13 2004 7:20 utc | 20

Quite a picture:
• 09/13 05:35 am U.N. Nuclear Agency Meets to Discuss Resolution on Iran’s Nuclear Program
• 09/13 04:55 am Putin Announces Measures to Increase Kremlin Control Over Politics
• 09/13 04:53 am Italy’s Foreign Minister Leaves for Mideast in Hostage Crisis
• 09/13 04:47 am Russian President Meets With Cabinet, Regional Governors to Discuss Response to Terror
• 09/13 04:31 am Saddam’s Hometown Falls Under Peaceful Spell
• 09/13 04:23 am U.S. Forces Kill 22 Insurgents in Clash in Southern Afghanistan
• 09/13 03:41 am Police Uncover Key Evidence in Bombing of Australian Embassy in Indonesia
• 09/13 03:16 am U.S. Warplanes Bomb Insurgent Stronghold of Fallujah; at Least 9 Killed
• 09/13 03:03 am Aid Workers Evacuate Western Afghan City After Rioting Over Governor’s Ouster
• 09/13 02:43 am Sudan Condemns Powell Comment That Humanitarian Crisis Amounts to Genocide
• 09/13 02:15 am U.S., South Korean Officials Say Mushroom Cloud in North Not From Nuclear Blast

Posted by: Pat | Sep 13 2004 10:39 utc | 21

@ Juannie,
Don’t be so fluoride gullible! The problem with that conspiracy theory is that the Saudis don’t want to have the US control them; they want to control the US. It is not in the Saudi interest to lose control over their own national assets for the benefit of US oil companies. Therefore it is illogical to claim that they would be complicit in a big US conspiracy to take away Saudi oil.
Bush/Cheney didn’t run the 911 attacks; they failed to prevent them; and failed to respond appropriately to them. They do have ‘other priorities’ which put their personal profit above our national safety. But they don’t have the ability to convince the Saudis to let them steal Saudi oil.

Posted by: gylangirl | Sep 13 2004 13:46 utc | 22

If this article is true, concentration camps for US citizens aka. democrats can’t be to far away.
Did the RNC lease Pier 57? – Did the NYPD use a facility leased by the RNC to hold protesters?

Posted by: Fran | Sep 13 2004 15:56 utc | 23

@Pat – thanks for the link to that Kolko essays. His thoughts are very sound and he exactly describes what is happening in Europe with regard to independence from US politics.

Posted by: b | Sep 13 2004 16:29 utc | 24

@b
You’re welcome, and I agree. That’s the best analysis I’ve read on the Atlantic Alliance in awhile – and gives much food for thought on the subject of formal, Great Power alliances in general. (Look at the damage caused by the US-Israel alliance, for instance.)
GWB is speeding up the inevitable – unwittingly returning the post-1948 world to a more natural, and in the end more sane, order. Regarding this, at least, we can be hopeful.

Posted by: Pat | Sep 13 2004 17:56 utc | 25

Pat: GWB is speeding up the inevitable – unwittingly returning the post-1948 world to a more natural, and in the end more sane, order. Regarding this, at least, we can be hopeful.
And just how is GWB doing this exactly? I’m not seeing any “sanity” “post-1948” or ever. Perhaps my view is askew, Pat, but I’m not getting that at all.

Posted by: Kate_Storm | Sep 13 2004 20:25 utc | 26

Hmmm, Kolko is partly right imho, as long as the end of the Atlantic alliance is a good thing because it weakens the US. But I’m also of the opinion that a US superpower without any opposing alliance is still a major trouble-maker, and in this regard, saying that all alliances should end is just a way of ensuring the continuing US supremacy. Of course, a new alliance openly against the US may well become a superpower of its own, which would bring us back into the usual problems.
Still, I think it’s pretty obvious that it’s what will happen, perhaps not as openly as NATO and Warsaw Pact, but tacitly, secretly. History, notably history of European powers in the last 500 years, showed that when one major power became too powerful, others allied to limit it, as a counterweight, and this process has been systematic during the last centuries. Alliances to stop the Habsburg to take over the world when they got both Spanish and Austrian empires, leagues against Louis XIV when France appeared to be able to take over Europe, with the near-union of France and Spain, coalitions against Napoleonic France, and then, ultimately, when German 2nd Empire became too powerful on the continent, France and England allied, and even Russia joined the fun, with the US coming late but on the allied side when WWI raged; similar configuration, more or less, for WWII. And then, parallel building up of NATO and Warsaw Pact (well, first the former, if I’m not mistaken). You hardly build new alliances from scratches in 10 years, but you may in 20, so this new configuration of powers may soon produce a new “interesting” alliance(s?).
All in all, Kolko is interesting and has good ideas, but first I wouldn’t use the WWI example – Germany would’ve utterly crushed France without the English-Russian alliance, and one can fairly easily assume that it’s better that France survived, even if one would wish they and the English hadn’t been so petty and vicious in the peace treaty. Second, even if Kolko is right that alliances are inherently bad – I don’t think so, or if he’s right, then the US should dissolve into 50 independant nations -, being right won’t be enough, and I’d bet that some new patterns of alliances will emerge during this decade (and they won’t necessarily be a good thing, of course; there are some alliances I really prefer not to see)

Posted by: Clueless Joe | Sep 13 2004 20:47 utc | 27

@Kate
My comment is related to Gabriel Kolko’s analysis over at Defense and the National Interest. The end of the post-World War II alliance system is good news rather than bad, as that alliance system has made possible – indeed, been the justification for – much foolishness.
@Clueless
“History, notably history of European powers in the last 500 years, showed that when one major power became too powerful, others allied to limit it, as a counterweight”
Right you are.

Posted by: Pat | Sep 13 2004 21:23 utc | 28

apologise if my pposting a little erratic of late – have just learnt that i have diabetes type 1 & have begun the process of injecting insulin
feel at onece humiliated & a little weary darker than my usual self(s)
feel as dum as diogenes about the malady but at least through our meditations on the slaughterhouse we are living – the metaphorical base is very clear
still steel

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 13 2004 23:38 utc | 29

@r´giap
sorry for you – it is quite a burdon. My dad had to do this since he was fourty. He looked back at a happy and fullfilled life when he died 38 years later.
stay steel

Posted by: b | Sep 14 2004 10:30 utc | 30

merci b for those words – happened so quicly & have had thougts that i was invulnerable – that it has hit me harder than i would have imagined
still steel

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 14 2004 17:27 utc | 31

stay still steel r’ giap!!
A Political blog w/in a political Blog.
I’ve been at the bar today (my own personal). Voted this morning in the Primary for myself & several others I think might help here in VT. Worked my paying job until noon and then decided to totally relax and become myself again until I hear in the morning what the outcome of this bifurcation will take. Either way, I will give it my all (or as my first vote for my campaign slogan that failed my friends scrutiny, “BALL’s OUT – for – STATE REP.”)
I won’t allow myself to know till morning. Goin’a just play my guitar and try to weather… whatever.
If I am on the Nov. ballot then I get to do what the Fates have ordained.
If I’m not on the Nov. ballot then I get to pursue my primary passion, Guitar! (and keeping up by monitoring the MoA. Where’s NEMO? Is he posting on Whiskey Annex? I can’t keep up with both. — NEMO, I MISS YOUR POSTS AND VALUABLE REFERENCES.)
Either way, it’s ok. I’ll just keep on keeping on.

Posted by: Juannie | Sep 14 2004 19:12 utc | 32

mike rupert from another point of view…:
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=consp_911&Number=293297747

Posted by: greg | Mar 5 2005 20:14 utc | 33